Running: ./testmodel.py --libraries=/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries --ompython_omhome=/usr Buildings_10_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.conf.json
loadFile("/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/ModelicaServices 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo", uses=false)
loadFile("/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Complex 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo", uses=false)
loadFile("/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Modelica 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo", uses=false)
loadFile("/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Buildings 10.1.1-maint.10.0.x/package.mo", uses=false)
Using package Buildings with version 10.1.1 (/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Buildings 10.1.1-maint.10.0.x/package.mo)
Using package Modelica with version 4.0.0 (/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Modelica 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo)
Using package Complex with version 4.0.0 (/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Complex 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo)
Using package ModelicaServices with version 4.0.0 (/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/ModelicaServices 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo)
Running command: translateModel(Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU,tolerance=1e-06,outputFormat="mat",numberOfIntervals=5000,variableFilter="time|sla.sta_b.T|sla.surf_a.T|sla.surf_b.T|sla.surf_a.Q_flow|sla.surf_b.Q_flow",fileNamePrefix="Buildings_10_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU")
translateModel(Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU,tolerance=1e-06,outputFormat="mat",numberOfIntervals=5000,variableFilter="time|sla.sta_b.T|sla.surf_a.T|sla.surf_b.T|sla.surf_a.Q_flow|sla.surf_b.Q_flow",fileNamePrefix="Buildings_10_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU")
Notification: Performance of loadFile(/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/ModelicaServices 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo): time 0.00176/0.00176, allocations: 111.3 kB / 15.23 MB, free: 0.6602 MB / 14.72 MB
Notification: Performance of loadFile(/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Complex 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo): time 0.001952/0.001952, allocations: 193.6 kB / 16.14 MB, free: 6.688 MB / 14.72 MB
Notification: Performance of loadFile(/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Modelica 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo): time 1.486/1.486, allocations: 222.9 MB / 239.8 MB, free: 4.633 MB / 190.1 MB
Notification: Performance of loadFile(/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Buildings 10.1.1-maint.10.0.x/package.mo): time 2.903/2.903, allocations: 437 MB / 0.71 GB, free: 5.391 MB / 0.5606 GB
Notification: Performance of FrontEnd - loaded program: time 0.002008/0.002008, allocations: 63.91 kB / 0.8686 GB, free: 5.227 MB / 0.7169 GB
Notification: Performance of FrontEnd - Absyn->SCode: time 0.6171/0.6191, allocations: 151.6 MB / 1.017 GB, free: 2.844 MB / 0.7637 GB
Notification: Performance of NFInst.instantiate(Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU): time 0.03565/0.6548, allocations: 31.58 MB / 1.047 GB, free: 3.148 MB / 0.795 GB
Notification: Performance of NFInst.instExpressions: time 0.02097/0.6758, allocations: 12.42 MB / 1.06 GB, free: 6.691 MB / 0.8106 GB
Notification: Performance of NFInst.updateImplicitVariability: time 0.003177/0.6791, allocations: 59.69 kB / 1.06 GB, free: 6.633 MB / 0.8106 GB
Notification: Performance of NFTyping.typeComponents: time 0.004074/0.6832, allocations: 0.976 MB / 1.061 GB, free: 5.652 MB / 0.8106 GB
Notification: Performance of NFTyping.typeBindings: time 0.007404/0.6907, allocations: 1.925 MB / 1.062 GB, free: 3.723 MB / 0.8106 GB
Notification: Performance of NFTyping.typeClassSections: time 0.006093/0.6968, allocations: 1.629 MB / 1.064 GB, free: 2.102 MB / 0.8106 GB
Notification: Performance of NFFlatten.flatten: time 0.02716/0.7239, allocations: 22.45 MB / 1.086 GB, free: 11.6 MB / 0.8419 GB
Notification: Performance of NFFlatten.resolveConnections: time 0.01044/0.7344, allocations: 5.57 MB / 1.091 GB, free: 5.953 MB / 0.8419 GB
Notification: Performance of NFEvalConstants.evaluate: time 0.0128/0.7473, allocations: 5.1 MB / 1.096 GB, free: 0.8359 MB / 0.8419 GB
Notification: Performance of NFSimplifyModel.simplify: time 0.01227/0.7596, allocations: 5.043 MB / 1.101 GB, free: 11.77 MB / 0.8575 GB
Notification: Performance of NFPackage.collectConstants: time 0.003323/0.7629, allocations: 312 kB / 1.102 GB, free: 11.47 MB / 0.8575 GB
Notification: Performance of NFFlatten.collectFunctions: time 0.01035/0.7733, allocations: 2.696 MB / 1.104 GB, free: 8.77 MB / 0.8575 GB
Notification: Performance of NFScalarize.scalarize: time 0.005471/0.7788, allocations: 2.375 MB / 1.107 GB, free: 6.387 MB / 0.8575 GB
Notification: Performance of NFVerifyModel.verify: time 0.01195/0.7908, allocations: 4.03 MB / 1.111 GB, free: 2.336 MB / 0.8575 GB
Notification: Performance of NFConvertDAE.convert: time 0.02395/0.8148, allocations: 14.97 MB / 1.125 GB, free: 3.324 MB / 0.8731 GB
Notification: Performance of FrontEnd - DAE generated: time 7.243e-06/0.8149, allocations: 0 / 1.125 GB, free: 3.324 MB / 0.8731 GB
Notification: Performance of FrontEnd: time 1.964e-06/0.8149, allocations: 0 / 1.125 GB, free: 3.324 MB / 0.8731 GB
Notification: Performance of Transformations before backend: time 0.0005848/0.8155, allocations: 0 / 1.125 GB, free: 3.324 MB / 0.8731 GB
Notification: Model statistics after passing the front-end and creating the data structures used by the back-end:
 * Number of equations: 866
 * Number of variables: 866
Notification: Performance of Generate backend data structure: time 0.03906/0.8545, allocations: 11.49 MB / 1.136 GB, free: 7.727 MB / 0.8887 GB
Notification: Performance of prepare preOptimizeDAE: time 5.48e-05/0.8546, allocations: 12.03 kB / 1.136 GB, free: 7.715 MB / 0.8887 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt normalInlineFunction (simulation): time 0.004524/0.8592, allocations: 0.881 MB / 1.137 GB, free: 6.824 MB / 0.8887 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt evaluateParameters (simulation): time 0.02512/0.8843, allocations: 9.422 MB / 1.146 GB, free: 13.32 MB / 0.9044 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt simplifyIfEquations (simulation): time 0.0004961/0.8848, allocations: 334.8 kB / 1.147 GB, free: 13 MB / 0.9044 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt expandDerOperator (simulation): time 0.002467/0.8873, allocations: 479.8 kB / 1.147 GB, free: 12.53 MB / 0.9044 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt clockPartitioning (simulation): time 0.0168/0.9041, allocations: 5.964 MB / 1.153 GB, free: 6.328 MB / 0.9044 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt findStateOrder (simulation): time 0.0001046/0.9043, allocations: 11.88 kB / 1.153 GB, free: 6.316 MB / 0.9044 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt replaceEdgeChange (simulation): time 0.0007127/0.905, allocations: 144 kB / 1.153 GB, free: 6.176 MB / 0.9044 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt inlineArrayEqn (simulation): time 0.0001504/0.9052, allocations: 99.98 kB / 1.153 GB, free: 6.078 MB / 0.9044 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt removeEqualRHS (simulation): time 0.01042/0.9156, allocations: 4.762 MB / 1.158 GB, free: 1.305 MB / 0.9044 GB
Warning: The model contains alias variables with redundant start and/or conflicting nominal values. It is recommended to resolve the conflicts, because otherwise the system could be hard to solve. To print the conflicting alias sets and the chosen candidates please use -d=aliasConflicts.
Notification: Performance of preOpt removeSimpleEquations (simulation): time 0.07944/0.9951, allocations: 33.8 MB / 1.191 GB, free: 13.86 MB / 0.9512 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt comSubExp (simulation): time 0.01461/1.01, allocations: 6.22 MB / 1.197 GB, free: 7.527 MB / 0.9512 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt resolveLoops (simulation): time 0.005189/1.015, allocations: 2.506 MB / 1.199 GB, free: 5.02 MB / 0.9512 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt evalFunc (simulation): time 0.03232/1.047, allocations: 13.2 MB / 1.212 GB, free: 7.277 MB / 0.9669 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt encapsulateWhenConditions (simulation): time 0.004719/1.052, allocations: 2.137 MB / 1.214 GB, free: 5.117 MB / 0.9669 GB
Notification: Performance of pre-optimization done (n=224): time 7.534e-06/1.052, allocations: 4 kB / 1.214 GB, free: 5.113 MB / 0.9669 GB
Notification: Performance of matching and sorting (n=232): time 0.03554/1.088, allocations: 14.01 MB / 1.228 GB, free: 6.914 MB / 0.9825 GB
Notification: Performance of inlineWhenForInitialization (initialization): time 0.0001241/1.088, allocations: 136.8 kB / 1.228 GB, free: 6.758 MB / 0.9825 GB
Notification: Performance of selectInitializationVariablesDAE (initialization): time 0.02514/1.113, allocations: 10.35 MB / 1.238 GB, free: 12.41 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of collectPreVariables (initialization): time 0.001082/1.114, allocations: 121.7 kB / 1.238 GB, free: 12.29 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of collectInitialEqns (initialization): time 0.005928/1.12, allocations: 3.308 MB / 1.242 GB, free: 8.957 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of collectInitialBindings (initialization): time 0.002304/1.122, allocations: 0.8708 MB / 1.243 GB, free: 8.074 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of simplifyInitialFunctions (initialization): time 0.003805/1.126, allocations: 1.202 MB / 1.244 GB, free: 6.863 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of setup shared object (initialization): time 0.0001584/1.126, allocations: 313 kB / 1.244 GB, free: 6.555 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of preBalanceInitialSystem (initialization): time 0.006372/1.133, allocations: 3.447 MB / 1.247 GB, free: 3.09 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of partitionIndependentBlocks (initialization): time 0.5522/1.685, allocations: 5.932 MB / 1.253 GB, free: 204 MB / 0.9981 GB
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3]))
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3]))
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3]))
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]))
Notification: Performance of analyzeInitialSystem (initialization): time 0.05946/1.745, allocations: 36.64 MB / 1.289 GB, free: 190.9 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of solveInitialSystemEqSystem (initialization): time 0.0001897/1.745, allocations: 22.41 kB / 1.289 GB, free: 190.9 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of matching and sorting (n=659) (initialization): time 0.01662/1.761, allocations: 10.08 MB / 1.299 GB, free: 184.7 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of prepare postOptimizeDAE: time 0.0001292/1.762, allocations: 77.69 kB / 1.299 GB, free: 184.7 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyComplexFunction (initialization): time 0.0001253/1.762, allocations: 88.16 kB / 1.299 GB, free: 184.6 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt tearingSystem (initialization): time 0.001456/1.763, allocations: 0.7045 MB / 1.3 GB, free: 183.8 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt solveSimpleEquations (initialization): time 0.004801/1.768, allocations: 1.474 MB / 1.301 GB, free: 182.4 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt calculateStrongComponentJacobians (initialization): time 0.008241/1.776, allocations: 13.41 MB / 1.314 GB, free: 168.1 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyAllExpressions (initialization): time 0.008829/1.785, allocations: 1.3 MB / 1.315 GB, free: 166.9 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt collapseArrayExpressions (initialization): time 0.001013/1.786, allocations: 280 kB / 1.316 GB, free: 166.6 MB / 0.9981 GB
Warning: The initial conditions are over specified. The following 8 initial equations are redundant, so they are removed from the initialization system:
         sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start
         sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start
         sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start
         sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start
         sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3])
         sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3])
         sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3])
         sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]).
Notification: Performance of preBalanceInitialSystem (initialization_lambda0): time 0.009114/1.795, allocations: 7.08 MB / 1.323 GB, free: 159.5 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of partitionIndependentBlocks (initialization_lambda0): time 0.00551/1.801, allocations: 5.932 MB / 1.328 GB, free: 152.3 MB / 0.9981 GB
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3]))
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3]))
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3]))
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]))
Notification: Performance of analyzeInitialSystem (initialization_lambda0): time 0.05191/1.853, allocations: 36.57 MB / 1.364 GB, free: 114.3 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of solveInitialSystemEqSystem (initialization_lambda0): time 7.549e-05/1.853, allocations: 24 kB / 1.364 GB, free: 114.3 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of matching and sorting (n=659) (initialization_lambda0): time 0.01878/1.872, allocations: 10.07 MB / 1.374 GB, free: 104.5 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of prepare postOptimizeDAE: time 0.0001174/1.872, allocations: 69.7 kB / 1.374 GB, free: 104.4 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyComplexFunction (initialization): time 0.0001257/1.872, allocations: 84.91 kB / 1.374 GB, free: 104.4 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt tearingSystem (initialization): time 0.001545/1.873, allocations: 0.717 MB / 1.375 GB, free: 103.6 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt solveSimpleEquations (initialization): time 0.005269/1.879, allocations: 1.478 MB / 1.376 GB, free: 102.1 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt calculateStrongComponentJacobians (initialization): time 0.008652/1.887, allocations: 13.41 MB / 1.389 GB, free: 87.88 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyAllExpressions (initialization): time 0.01003/1.898, allocations: 1.307 MB / 1.391 GB, free: 86.6 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt collapseArrayExpressions (initialization): time 0.001403/1.899, allocations: 272 kB / 1.391 GB, free: 86.34 MB / 0.9981 GB
Warning: The initial conditions are over specified. The following 8 initial equations are redundant, so they are removed from the initialization_lambda0 system:
         sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start
         sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start
         sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start
         sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start
         sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3])
         sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3])
         sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3])
         sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]).
Notification: Model statistics after passing the back-end for initialization:
 * Number of independent subsystems: 384
 * Number of states: 0 ()
 * Number of discrete variables: 5 ($PRE.pulse.count,$PRE.pulse.T_start,pulse.count,pulse.T_start,$whenCondition1)
 * Number of discrete states: 0 ()
 * Number of clocked states: 0 ()
 * Top-level inputs: 0
Notification: Strong component statistics for initialization (635):
 * Single equations (assignments): 627
 * Array equations: 0
 * Algorithm blocks: 1
 * Record equations: 0
 * When equations: 0
 * If-equations: 0
 * Equation systems (not torn): 0
 * Torn equation systems: 7
 * Mixed (continuous/discrete) equation systems: 0
Notification: Torn system details for strict tearing set:
 * Linear torn systems (#iteration vars, #inner vars, density): 7 systems
   {(1,9,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,9,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%)}
 * Non-linear torn systems (#iteration vars, #inner vars): 0 systems
Notification: Performance of prepare postOptimizeDAE: time 0.002571/1.902, allocations: 0.7661 MB / 1.392 GB, free: 85.61 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt lateInlineFunction (simulation): time 0.003/1.905, allocations: 0.6568 MB / 1.392 GB, free: 85.28 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt wrapFunctionCalls (simulation): time 0.01054/1.915, allocations: 5.154 MB / 1.397 GB, free: 80.09 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt inlineArrayEqn (simulation): time 2.738e-05/1.915, allocations: 24 kB / 1.397 GB, free: 80.07 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt constantLinearSystem (simulation): time 1.908e-05/1.915, allocations: 4 kB / 1.397 GB, free: 80.07 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifysemiLinear (simulation): time 0.005166/1.92, allocations: 3.966 MB / 1.401 GB, free: 76.07 MB / 0.9981 GB
Warning: The model contains alias variables with redundant start and/or conflicting nominal values. It is recommended to resolve the conflicts, because otherwise the system could be hard to solve. To print the conflicting alias sets and the chosen candidates please use -d=aliasConflicts.
Notification: Performance of postOpt removeSimpleEquations (simulation): time 0.02294/1.943, allocations: 13.38 MB / 1.414 GB, free: 62.52 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyComplexFunction (simulation): time 1.102e-05/1.943, allocations: 4.031 kB / 1.414 GB, free: 62.52 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt solveSimpleEquations (simulation): time 0.002369/1.946, allocations: 0.6007 MB / 1.415 GB, free: 61.91 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt tearingSystem (simulation): time 0.001287/1.947, allocations: 0.5833 MB / 1.416 GB, free: 61.31 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt inputDerivativesUsed (simulation): time 0.0003187/1.947, allocations: 131.9 kB / 1.416 GB, free: 61.18 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt calculateStrongComponentJacobians (simulation): time 0.008012/1.955, allocations: 13.29 MB / 1.429 GB, free: 46.96 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt calculateStateSetsJacobians (simulation): time 4.468e-06/1.956, allocations: 4 kB / 1.429 GB, free: 46.96 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt symbolicJacobian (simulation): time 0.01066/1.966, allocations: 7.121 MB / 1.436 GB, free: 39.75 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt removeConstants (simulation): time 0.004858/1.971, allocations: 1.658 MB / 1.437 GB, free: 38.07 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyTimeIndepFuncCalls (simulation): time 0.002271/1.973, allocations: 127.9 kB / 1.437 GB, free: 37.95 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyAllExpressions (simulation): time 0.006629/1.98, allocations: 0.6954 MB / 1.438 GB, free: 37.26 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt findZeroCrossings (simulation): time 0.0006789/1.981, allocations: 165.6 kB / 1.438 GB, free: 37.09 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt collapseArrayExpressions (simulation): time 0.0003534/1.981, allocations: 83.95 kB / 1.438 GB, free: 37.01 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of sorting global known variables: time 0.0145/1.996, allocations: 7.284 MB / 1.445 GB, free: 29.74 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of sort global known variables: time 4.91e-07/1.996, allocations: 0 / 1.445 GB, free: 29.74 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of remove unused functions: time 0.01532/2.011, allocations: 3.947 MB / 1.449 GB, free: 25.83 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Model statistics after passing the back-end for simulation:
 * Number of independent subsystems: 12
 * Number of states: 43 (sla.vol[1].dynBal.U,sla.vol[2].dynBal.U,sla.vol[3].dynBal.U,sla.vol[4].dynBal.U,sla.vol[5].dynBal.U,sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_b[1].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[2].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[3].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[4].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[5].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T[3],TOut.T)
 * Number of discrete variables: 3 ($whenCondition1,pulse.T_start,pulse.count)
 * Number of discrete states: 1 (pulse.count)
 * Number of clocked states: 0 ()
 * Top-level inputs: 0
Notification: Strong component statistics for simulation (210):
 * Single equations (assignments): 199
 * Array equations: 0
 * Algorithm blocks: 0
 * Record equations: 2
 * When equations: 2
 * If-equations: 0
 * Equation systems (not torn): 0
 * Torn equation systems: 7
 * Mixed (continuous/discrete) equation systems: 0
Notification: Torn system details for strict tearing set:
 * Linear torn systems (#iteration vars, #inner vars, density): 7 systems
   {(1,9,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,9,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%)}
 * Non-linear torn systems (#iteration vars, #inner vars): 0 systems
Notification: Performance of Backend phase and start with SimCode phase: time 0.002002/2.013, allocations: 0.5931 MB / 1.45 GB, free: 25.3 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of simCode: created initialization part: time 0.01858/2.032, allocations: 13.41 MB / 1.463 GB, free: 11.72 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of simCode: created event and clocks part: time 1.465e-05/2.032, allocations: 0 / 1.463 GB, free: 11.72 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of simCode: created simulation system equations: time 0.004656/2.036, allocations: 3.04 MB / 1.466 GB, free: 8.59 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of simCode: created of all other equations (e.g. parameter, nominal, assert, etc): time 0.01752/2.054, allocations: 2.786 MB / 1.469 GB, free: 5.809 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of simCode: created linear, non-linear and system jacobian parts: time 0.04185/2.096, allocations: 21.12 MB / 1.489 GB, free: 0.7227 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of simCode: some other stuff during SimCode phase: time 0.0117/2.108, allocations: 5.372 MB / 1.494 GB, free: 11.32 MB / 1.029 GB
Notification: Performance of simCode: alias equations: time 0.0178/2.125, allocations: 6.385 MB / 1.501 GB, free: 4.941 MB / 1.029 GB
Notification: Performance of simCode: all other stuff during SimCode phase: time 0.002944/2.128, allocations: 423.4 kB / 1.501 GB, free: 4.527 MB / 1.029 GB
Notification: Performance of SimCode: time 1.342e-06/2.128, allocations: 0 / 1.501 GB, free: 4.527 MB / 1.029 GB
Notification: Performance of Templates: time 0.2556/2.384, allocations: 138.7 MB / 1.636 GB, free: 11.04 MB / 1.17 GB
make -j1 -f Buildings_10_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.makefile
(rm -f Buildings_10_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.pipe ; mkfifo Buildings_10_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.pipe ; head -c 1048576 < Buildings_10_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.pipe >> ../files/Buildings_10_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.sim & ./Buildings_10_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU  -abortSlowSimulation -alarm=400  -emit_protected -lv LOG_STATS > Buildings_10_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.pipe 2>&1)
diffSimulationResults("Buildings_10_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU_res.mat","/mnt/ReferenceFiles/Buildings/csv/maint_10.0.x/Buildings_Fluid_HeatExchangers_RadiantSlabs_Examples_StepResponseEpsilonNTU.csv","/var/lib/jenkins/ws/OpenModelicaLibraryTestingWork/OpenModelicaLibraryTesting/files/Buildings_10_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.diff",relTol=0.003,relTolDiffMinMax=0.003,rangeDelta=0.001)
Reference file matches