Running: ./testmodel.py --libraries=/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries --ompython_omhome=/usr Buildings_latest_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference.conf.json
loadFile("/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/ModelicaServices 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo", uses=false)
loadFile("/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Complex 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo", uses=false)
loadFile("/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Modelica 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo", uses=false)
loadFile("/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Buildings 11.0.0-master/package.mo", uses=false)
Using package Buildings with version 11.0.0 (/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Buildings 11.0.0-master/package.mo)
Using package Modelica with version 4.0.0 (/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Modelica 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo)
Using package Complex with version 4.0.0 (/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Complex 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo)
Using package ModelicaServices with version 4.0.0 (/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/ModelicaServices 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo)
Running command: "" <> buildModelFMU(Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference,fileNamePrefix="Buildings_latest_Buildings_Fluid_HeatExchangers_RadiantSlabs_Examples_StepResponseFiniteDifference",fmuType="me",version="2.0",platforms={"static"})
"" <> buildModelFMU(Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference,fileNamePrefix="Buildings_latest_Buildings_Fluid_HeatExchangers_RadiantSlabs_Examples_StepResponseFiniteDifference",fmuType="me",version="2.0",platforms={"static"})
Notification: Performance of loadFile(/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/ModelicaServices 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo): time 0.001264/0.001264, allocations: 111.3 kB / 15.23 MB, free: 0.6602 MB / 14.72 MB
Notification: Performance of loadFile(/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Complex 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo): time 0.001269/0.001269, allocations: 191.7 kB / 16.13 MB, free: 6.691 MB / 14.72 MB
Notification: Performance of loadFile(/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Modelica 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo): time 1.271/1.271, allocations: 222.9 MB / 239.8 MB, free: 4.617 MB / 190.1 MB
Notification: Performance of loadFile(/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Buildings 11.0.0-master/package.mo): time 2.503/2.503, allocations: 461.8 MB / 0.7342 GB, free: 14.24 MB / 0.5919 GB
Notification: Performance of FrontEnd - loaded program: time 0.001278/0.001278, allocations: 71.8 kB / 0.8985 GB, free: 36.93 MB / 0.7169 GB
Notification: Performance of FrontEnd - Absyn->SCode: time 0.2323/0.2335, allocations: 157.4 MB / 1.052 GB, free: 8.246 MB / 0.8106 GB
Notification: Performance of NFInst.instantiate(Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference): time 0.02812/0.2617, allocations: 31.57 MB / 1.083 GB, free: 8.559 MB / 0.8419 GB
Notification: Performance of NFInst.instExpressions: time 0.01711/0.2788, allocations: 12.43 MB / 1.095 GB, free: 12.09 MB / 0.8575 GB
Notification: Performance of NFInst.updateImplicitVariability: time 0.002173/0.2811, allocations: 55.69 kB / 1.095 GB, free: 12.04 MB / 0.8575 GB
Notification: Performance of NFTyping.typeComponents: time 0.002732/0.2838, allocations: 0.976 MB / 1.096 GB, free: 11.05 MB / 0.8575 GB
Notification: Performance of NFTyping.typeBindings: time 0.004337/0.2882, allocations: 1.924 MB / 1.098 GB, free: 9.125 MB / 0.8575 GB
Notification: Performance of NFTyping.typeClassSections: time 0.004004/0.2922, allocations: 1.62 MB / 1.1 GB, free: 7.512 MB / 0.8575 GB
Notification: Performance of NFFlatten.flatten: time 0.01863/0.3109, allocations: 22.46 MB / 1.122 GB, free: 1.004 MB / 0.8731 GB
Notification: Performance of NFFlatten.resolveConnections: time 0.006174/0.3171, allocations: 5.574 MB / 1.127 GB, free: 11.35 MB / 0.8887 GB
Notification: Performance of NFEvalConstants.evaluate: time 0.006607/0.3237, allocations: 5.096 MB / 1.132 GB, free: 6.238 MB / 0.8887 GB
Notification: Performance of NFSimplifyModel.simplify: time 0.00578/0.3295, allocations: 5.043 MB / 1.137 GB, free: 1.176 MB / 0.8887 GB
Notification: Performance of NFPackage.collectConstants: time 0.0006771/0.3302, allocations: 312 kB / 1.137 GB, free: 0.8711 MB / 0.8887 GB
Notification: Performance of NFFlatten.collectFunctions: time 0.00481/0.335, allocations: 2.7 MB / 1.14 GB, free: 14.17 MB / 0.9044 GB
Notification: Performance of NFScalarize.scalarize: time 0.002123/0.3371, allocations: 2.371 MB / 1.142 GB, free: 11.79 MB / 0.9044 GB
Notification: Performance of NFVerifyModel.verify: time 0.004204/0.3413, allocations: 4.026 MB / 1.146 GB, free: 7.742 MB / 0.9044 GB
Notification: Performance of NFConvertDAE.convert: time 0.01223/0.3536, allocations: 14.97 MB / 1.161 GB, free: 8.727 MB / 0.92 GB
Notification: Performance of FrontEnd - DAE generated: time 4.288e-06/0.3536, allocations: 0 / 1.161 GB, free: 8.727 MB / 0.92 GB
Notification: Performance of FrontEnd: time 1.262e-06/0.3536, allocations: 0 / 1.161 GB, free: 8.727 MB / 0.92 GB
Notification: Performance of Transformations before backend: time 0.0002534/0.3539, allocations: 0 / 1.161 GB, free: 8.727 MB / 0.92 GB
Notification: Model statistics after passing the front-end and creating the data structures used by the back-end:
 * Number of equations: 866
 * Number of variables: 866
Notification: Performance of Generate backend data structure: time 0.02049/0.3744, allocations: 11.49 MB / 1.172 GB, free: 13.13 MB / 0.9356 GB
Notification: Performance of prepare preOptimizeDAE: time 3.938e-05/0.3744, allocations: 8.031 kB / 1.172 GB, free: 13.12 MB / 0.9356 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt introduceOutputAliases (simulation): time 0.0006466/0.3751, allocations: 0.4886 MB / 1.172 GB, free: 12.62 MB / 0.9356 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt normalInlineFunction (simulation): time 0.001807/0.3769, allocations: 0.8769 MB / 1.173 GB, free: 11.73 MB / 0.9356 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt evaluateParameters (simulation): time 0.01504/0.3919, allocations: 9.426 MB / 1.182 GB, free: 2.23 MB / 0.9356 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt simplifyIfEquations (simulation): time 0.0001954/0.3921, allocations: 334.8 kB / 1.183 GB, free: 1.902 MB / 0.9356 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt expandDerOperator (simulation): time 0.000706/0.3929, allocations: 483.8 kB / 1.183 GB, free: 1.43 MB / 0.9356 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt clockPartitioning (simulation): time 0.007857/0.4007, allocations: 5.96 MB / 1.189 GB, free: 11.23 MB / 0.9512 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt findStateOrder (simulation): time 6.191e-05/0.4008, allocations: 19.83 kB / 1.189 GB, free: 11.21 MB / 0.9512 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt replaceEdgeChange (simulation): time 0.0003187/0.4011, allocations: 151.9 kB / 1.189 GB, free: 11.07 MB / 0.9512 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt inlineArrayEqn (simulation): time 7.812e-05/0.4012, allocations: 99.92 kB / 1.189 GB, free: 10.97 MB / 0.9512 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt removeEqualRHS (simulation): time 0.006214/0.4074, allocations: 4.762 MB / 1.194 GB, free: 6.195 MB / 0.9512 GB
Warning: The model contains alias variables with redundant start and/or conflicting nominal values. It is recommended to resolve the conflicts, because otherwise the system could be hard to solve. To print the conflicting alias sets and the chosen candidates please use -d=aliasConflicts.
Notification: Performance of preOpt removeSimpleEquations (simulation): time 0.04366/0.4511, allocations: 33.77 MB / 1.227 GB, free: 2.77 MB / 0.9825 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt comSubExp (simulation): time 0.01024/0.4614, allocations: 6.232 MB / 1.233 GB, free: 12.43 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt resolveLoops (simulation): time 0.003142/0.4645, allocations: 2.498 MB / 1.236 GB, free: 9.926 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt evalFunc (simulation): time 0.4498/0.9143, allocations: 13.2 MB / 1.248 GB, free: 168.5 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt encapsulateWhenConditions (simulation): time 0.003151/0.9175, allocations: 2.135 MB / 1.25 GB, free: 168.4 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of pre-optimization done (n=224): time 4.228e-06/0.9176, allocations: 0 / 1.25 GB, free: 168.4 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of matching and sorting (n=232): time 0.02228/0.9398, allocations: 14.02 MB / 1.264 GB, free: 165.4 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of inlineWhenForInitialization (initialization): time 5.586e-05/0.9399, allocations: 128.2 kB / 1.264 GB, free: 165.3 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of selectInitializationVariablesDAE (initialization): time 0.01587/0.9558, allocations: 10.35 MB / 1.274 GB, free: 164.8 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of collectPreVariables (initialization): time 0.0007576/0.9566, allocations: 123.2 kB / 1.275 GB, free: 164.7 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of collectInitialEqns (initialization): time 0.002978/0.9596, allocations: 3.306 MB / 1.278 GB, free: 162.3 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of collectInitialBindings (initialization): time 0.001348/0.9609, allocations: 0.8716 MB / 1.279 GB, free: 161.7 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of simplifyInitialFunctions (initialization): time 0.001577/0.9625, allocations: 1.206 MB / 1.28 GB, free: 161.2 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of setup shared object (initialization): time 3.418e-05/0.9626, allocations: 305.9 kB / 1.28 GB, free: 160.9 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of preBalanceInitialSystem (initialization): time 0.004148/0.9667, allocations: 3.448 MB / 1.283 GB, free: 160 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of partitionIndependentBlocks (initialization): time 0.004762/0.9715, allocations: 5.936 MB / 1.289 GB, free: 155.8 MB / 0.9981 GB
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3]))
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3]))
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3]))
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]))
Notification: Performance of analyzeInitialSystem (initialization): time 0.04044/1.012, allocations: 36.63 MB / 1.325 GB, free: 126.3 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of solveInitialSystemEqSystem (initialization): time 5.684e-05/1.012, allocations: 24 kB / 1.325 GB, free: 126.3 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of matching and sorting (n=659) (initialization): time 0.01283/1.025, allocations: 10.09 MB / 1.335 GB, free: 116.1 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of prepare postOptimizeDAE: time 6.471e-05/1.025, allocations: 69.95 kB / 1.335 GB, free: 116 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyComplexFunction (initialization): time 8.581e-05/1.025, allocations: 84 kB / 1.335 GB, free: 115.9 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt tearingSystem (initialization): time 0.001278/1.026, allocations: 0.715 MB / 1.336 GB, free: 115.2 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt solveSimpleEquations (initialization): time 0.004262/1.031, allocations: 1.478 MB / 1.337 GB, free: 113.7 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt calculateStrongComponentJacobians (initialization): time 0.007363/1.038, allocations: 13.41 MB / 1.35 GB, free: 99.4 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyAllExpressions (initialization): time 0.008204/1.046, allocations: 1.298 MB / 1.352 GB, free: 98.1 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt collapseArrayExpressions (initialization): time 0.0006164/1.047, allocations: 280 kB / 1.352 GB, free: 97.83 MB / 0.9981 GB
Warning: The initial conditions are over specified. The following 8 initial equations are redundant, so they are removed from the initialization system:
         sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start
         sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start
         sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start
         sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start
         sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3])
         sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3])
         sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3])
         sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]).
Notification: Performance of preBalanceInitialSystem (initialization_lambda0): time 0.007869/1.055, allocations: 7.079 MB / 1.359 GB, free: 90.74 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of partitionIndependentBlocks (initialization_lambda0): time 0.004422/1.059, allocations: 5.932 MB / 1.365 GB, free: 83.6 MB / 0.9981 GB
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3]))
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3]))
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3]))
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]))
Notification: Performance of analyzeInitialSystem (initialization_lambda0): time 0.04007/1.099, allocations: 36.57 MB / 1.4 GB, free: 45.59 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of solveInitialSystemEqSystem (initialization_lambda0): time 4.484e-05/1.099, allocations: 24 kB / 1.4 GB, free: 45.57 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of matching and sorting (n=659) (initialization_lambda0): time 0.01219/1.112, allocations: 10.07 MB / 1.41 GB, free: 35.41 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of prepare postOptimizeDAE: time 5.311e-05/1.112, allocations: 67.48 kB / 1.41 GB, free: 35.34 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyComplexFunction (initialization): time 7.052e-05/1.112, allocations: 84 kB / 1.41 GB, free: 35.26 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt tearingSystem (initialization): time 0.001246/1.113, allocations: 0.7161 MB / 1.411 GB, free: 34.52 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt solveSimpleEquations (initialization): time 0.004053/1.117, allocations: 1.478 MB / 1.412 GB, free: 33.04 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt calculateStrongComponentJacobians (initialization): time 0.007348/1.124, allocations: 13.41 MB / 1.425 GB, free: 18.72 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyAllExpressions (initialization): time 0.008694/1.133, allocations: 1.305 MB / 1.427 GB, free: 17.41 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt collapseArrayExpressions (initialization): time 0.0009324/1.134, allocations: 276 kB / 1.427 GB, free: 17.14 MB / 0.9981 GB
Warning: The initial conditions are over specified. The following 8 initial equations are redundant, so they are removed from the initialization_lambda0 system:
         sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start
         sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start
         sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start
         sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start
         sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3])
         sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3])
         sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3])
         sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]).
Notification: Model statistics after passing the back-end for initialization:
 * Number of independent subsystems: 384
 * Number of states: 0 ()
 * Number of discrete variables: 5 ($PRE.pulse.count,$PRE.pulse.T_start,pulse.count,pulse.T_start,$whenCondition1)
 * Number of discrete states: 0 ()
 * Number of clocked states: 0 ()
 * Top-level inputs: 0
Notification: Strong component statistics for initialization (635):
 * Single equations (assignments): 627
 * Array equations: 0
 * Algorithm blocks: 1
 * Record equations: 0
 * When equations: 0
 * If-equations: 0
 * Equation systems (not torn): 0
 * Torn equation systems: 7
 * Mixed (continuous/discrete) equation systems: 0
Notification: Torn system details for strict tearing set:
 * Linear torn systems (#iteration vars, #inner vars, density): 7 systems
   {(1,9,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,9,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%)}
 * Non-linear torn systems (#iteration vars, #inner vars): 0 systems
Notification: Performance of prepare postOptimizeDAE: time 0.001793/1.136, allocations: 0.754 MB / 1.428 GB, free: 16.39 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt lateInlineFunction (simulation): time 0.00194/1.138, allocations: 0.6595 MB / 1.428 GB, free: 15.72 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt wrapFunctionCalls (simulation): time 0.007012/1.145, allocations: 5.157 MB / 1.433 GB, free: 10.52 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt inlineArrayEqn (simulation): time 1.655e-05/1.145, allocations: 20 kB / 1.433 GB, free: 10.5 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt constantLinearSystem (simulation): time 9.418e-06/1.145, allocations: 8 kB / 1.433 GB, free: 10.5 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifysemiLinear (simulation): time 0.004157/1.149, allocations: 3.962 MB / 1.437 GB, free: 6.5 MB / 0.9981 GB
Warning: The model contains alias variables with redundant start and/or conflicting nominal values. It is recommended to resolve the conflicts, because otherwise the system could be hard to solve. To print the conflicting alias sets and the chosen candidates please use -d=aliasConflicts.
Notification: Performance of postOpt removeSimpleEquations (simulation): time 0.02068/1.17, allocations: 13.39 MB / 1.45 GB, free: 8.945 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyComplexFunction (simulation): time 1.251e-05/1.17, allocations: 7.938 kB / 1.45 GB, free: 8.938 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt solveSimpleEquations (simulation): time 0.002368/1.172, allocations: 0.6007 MB / 1.451 GB, free: 8.336 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt tearingSystem (simulation): time 0.001312/1.173, allocations: 0.5794 MB / 1.452 GB, free: 7.734 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt inputDerivativesUsed (simulation): time 0.0002375/1.174, allocations: 136.4 kB / 1.452 GB, free: 7.602 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt calculateStrongComponentJacobians (simulation): time 0.01023/1.184, allocations: 13.28 MB / 1.465 GB, free: 9.406 MB / 1.029 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt calculateStateSetsJacobians (simulation): time 3.917e-06/1.184, allocations: 4 kB / 1.465 GB, free: 9.402 MB / 1.029 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt symbolicJacobian (simulation): time 0.0104/1.194, allocations: 7.118 MB / 1.472 GB, free: 2.195 MB / 1.029 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt removeConstants (simulation): time 0.004131/1.199, allocations: 1.66 MB / 1.473 GB, free: 0.5039 MB / 1.029 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyTimeIndepFuncCalls (simulation): time 0.001258/1.2, allocations: 123.9 kB / 1.473 GB, free: 392 kB / 1.029 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyAllExpressions (simulation): time 0.004047/1.204, allocations: 0.7054 MB / 1.474 GB, free: 15.68 MB / 1.045 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt findZeroCrossings (simulation): time 0.0003995/1.204, allocations: 161.7 kB / 1.474 GB, free: 15.52 MB / 1.045 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt collapseArrayExpressions (simulation): time 0.0001924/1.204, allocations: 83.95 kB / 1.474 GB, free: 15.44 MB / 1.045 GB
Notification: Performance of sorting global known variables: time 0.01104/1.215, allocations: 7.288 MB / 1.481 GB, free: 8.16 MB / 1.045 GB
Notification: Performance of sort global known variables: time 4.6e-07/1.216, allocations: 0 / 1.481 GB, free: 8.16 MB / 1.045 GB
Notification: Performance of remove unused functions: time 0.0128/1.228, allocations: 3.948 MB / 1.485 GB, free: 4.238 MB / 1.045 GB
Notification: Model statistics after passing the back-end for simulation:
 * Number of independent subsystems: 12
 * Number of states: 43 (sla.vol[1].dynBal.U,sla.vol[2].dynBal.U,sla.vol[3].dynBal.U,sla.vol[4].dynBal.U,sla.vol[5].dynBal.U,sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_b[1].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[2].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[3].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[4].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[5].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T[3],TOut.T)
 * Number of discrete variables: 3 ($whenCondition1,pulse.T_start,pulse.count)
 * Number of discrete states: 1 (pulse.count)
 * Number of clocked states: 0 ()
 * Top-level inputs: 0
Notification: Strong component statistics for simulation (210):
 * Single equations (assignments): 199
 * Array equations: 0
 * Algorithm blocks: 0
 * Record equations: 2
 * When equations: 2
 * If-equations: 0
 * Equation systems (not torn): 0
 * Torn equation systems: 7
 * Mixed (continuous/discrete) equation systems: 0
Notification: Torn system details for strict tearing set:
 * Linear torn systems (#iteration vars, #inner vars, density): 7 systems
   {(1,9,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,9,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%)}
 * Non-linear torn systems (#iteration vars, #inner vars): 0 systems
Notification: Performance of Backend phase and start with SimCode phase: time 0.01086/1.239, allocations: 8.188 MB / 1.493 GB, free: 12.04 MB / 1.061 GB
Notification: Performance of simCode: created initialization part: time 0.01787/1.257, allocations: 13.39 MB / 1.506 GB, free: 14.46 MB / 1.076 GB
Notification: Performance of simCode: created event and clocks part: time 5.2e-06/1.257, allocations: 0 / 1.506 GB, free: 14.46 MB / 1.076 GB
Notification: Performance of simCode: created simulation system equations: time 0.003876/1.261, allocations: 3.051 MB / 1.509 GB, free: 11.32 MB / 1.076 GB
Notification: Performance of simCode: created of all other equations (e.g. parameter, nominal, assert, etc): time 0.0108/1.272, allocations: 2.794 MB / 1.512 GB, free: 8.559 MB / 1.076 GB
Notification: Performance of simCode: created linear, non-linear and system jacobian parts: time 0.3221/1.594, allocations: 101.7 MB / 1.611 GB, free: 10.97 MB / 1.186 GB
Notification: Performance of simCode: some other stuff during SimCode phase: time 0.00535/1.599, allocations: 5.373 MB / 1.617 GB, free: 5.555 MB / 1.186 GB
Notification: Performance of simCode: alias equations: time 0.01283/1.612, allocations: 6.381 MB / 1.623 GB, free: 15.18 MB / 1.201 GB
Notification: Performance of simCode: all other stuff during SimCode phase: time 0.004429/1.617, allocations: 2.975 MB / 1.626 GB, free: 12.21 MB / 1.201 GB
Notification: Performance of SimCode: time 8.61e-07/1.617, allocations: 0 / 1.626 GB, free: 12.21 MB / 1.201 GB
Notification: Performance of buildModelFMU: Generate the FMI files: time 2.763/4.38, allocations: 202.5 MB / 1.823 GB, free: 381.9 MB / 1.295 GB
Notification: Performance of buildModelFMU: configured platform static using cached values: time 0.0001852/4.38, allocations: 305.9 kB / 1.824 GB, free: 381.5 MB / 1.295 GB
Notification: Performance of buildModelFMU: Generate platform static: time 6.592/10.97, allocations: 0 / 1.824 GB, free: 381.5 MB / 1.295 GB
(rm -f Buildings_latest_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference.pipe ; mkfifo Buildings_latest_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference.pipe ; head -c 1048576 < Buildings_latest_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference.pipe >> ../files/Buildings_latest_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference.sim & /home/hudson/saved_omc/OMSimulator/install/bin/OMSimulator -r=Buildings_latest_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference_res.mat --tempDir=temp_Buildings_latest_Buildings_Fluid_HeatExchangers_RadiantSlabs_Examples_StepResponseFiniteDifference_fmu --startTime=0 --stopTime=86400 --timeout=50 --tolerance=1e-06 Buildings_latest_Buildings_Fluid_HeatExchangers_RadiantSlabs_Examples_StepResponseFiniteDifference.fmu > Buildings_latest_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference.pipe 2>&1)