Running: ./testmodel.py --libraries=/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries --ompython_omhome=/usr Buildings_latest_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.conf.json loadFile("/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/ModelicaServices 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo", uses=false) loadFile("/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Complex 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo", uses=false) loadFile("/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Modelica 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo", uses=false) loadFile("/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Buildings 11.0.0-master/package.mo", uses=false) Using package Buildings with version 11.0.0 (/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Buildings 11.0.0-master/package.mo) Using package Modelica with version 4.0.0 (/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Modelica 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo) Using package Complex with version 4.0.0 (/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Complex 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo) Using package ModelicaServices with version 4.0.0 (/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/ModelicaServices 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo) Running command: "" <> buildModelFMU(Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU,fileNamePrefix="Buildings_latest_Buildings_Fluid_HeatExchangers_RadiantSlabs_Examples_StepResponseEpsilonNTU",fmuType="me",version="2.0",platforms={"static"}) "" <> buildModelFMU(Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU,fileNamePrefix="Buildings_latest_Buildings_Fluid_HeatExchangers_RadiantSlabs_Examples_StepResponseEpsilonNTU",fmuType="me",version="2.0",platforms={"static"}) Notification: Performance of loadFile(/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/ModelicaServices 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo): time 0.001249/0.001248, allocations: 111.3 kB / 15.23 MB, free: 0.6406 MB / 14.72 MB Notification: Performance of loadFile(/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Complex 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo): time 0.00125/0.00125, allocations: 193.5 kB / 16.14 MB, free: 6.711 MB / 14.72 MB Notification: Performance of loadFile(/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Modelica 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo): time 1.293/1.293, allocations: 222.9 MB / 239.8 MB, free: 4.543 MB / 190.1 MB Notification: Performance of loadFile(/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Buildings 11.0.0-master/package.mo): time 2.497/2.497, allocations: 461.9 MB / 0.7342 GB, free: 14.14 MB / 0.5919 GB Notification: Performance of FrontEnd - loaded program: time 0.001186/0.001186, allocations: 61.2 kB / 0.8985 GB, free: 36.97 MB / 0.7169 GB Notification: Performance of FrontEnd - Absyn->SCode: time 0.234/0.2352, allocations: 157.4 MB / 1.052 GB, free: 8.188 MB / 0.8106 GB Notification: Performance of NFInst.instantiate(Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU): time 0.03053/0.2658, allocations: 31.57 MB / 1.083 GB, free: 8.5 MB / 0.8419 GB Notification: Performance of NFInst.instExpressions: time 0.02516/0.291, allocations: 12.42 MB / 1.095 GB, free: 12.05 MB / 0.8575 GB Notification: Performance of NFInst.updateImplicitVariability: time 0.002178/0.2932, allocations: 55.69 kB / 1.095 GB, free: 11.99 MB / 0.8575 GB Notification: Performance of NFTyping.typeComponents: time 0.004048/0.2973, allocations: 0.9721 MB / 1.096 GB, free: 11.02 MB / 0.8575 GB Notification: Performance of NFTyping.typeBindings: time 0.007134/0.3044, allocations: 1.932 MB / 1.098 GB, free: 9.078 MB / 0.8575 GB Notification: Performance of NFTyping.typeClassSections: time 0.006509/0.311, allocations: 1.625 MB / 1.1 GB, free: 7.461 MB / 0.8575 GB Notification: Performance of NFFlatten.flatten: time 0.02313/0.3341, allocations: 22.45 MB / 1.122 GB, free: 0.957 MB / 0.8731 GB Notification: Performance of NFFlatten.resolveConnections: time 0.00645/0.3406, allocations: 5.57 MB / 1.127 GB, free: 11.31 MB / 0.8887 GB Notification: Performance of NFEvalConstants.evaluate: time 0.007471/0.3481, allocations: 5.1 MB / 1.132 GB, free: 6.191 MB / 0.8887 GB Notification: Performance of NFSimplifyModel.simplify: time 0.006768/0.3549, allocations: 5.039 MB / 1.137 GB, free: 1.133 MB / 0.8887 GB Notification: Performance of NFPackage.collectConstants: time 0.0009468/0.3559, allocations: 312 kB / 1.137 GB, free: 0.8281 MB / 0.8887 GB Notification: Performance of NFFlatten.collectFunctions: time 0.005166/0.361, allocations: 2.707 MB / 1.14 GB, free: 14.12 MB / 0.9044 GB Notification: Performance of NFScalarize.scalarize: time 0.002186/0.3632, allocations: 2.367 MB / 1.142 GB, free: 11.74 MB / 0.9044 GB Notification: Performance of NFVerifyModel.verify: time 0.004671/0.3679, allocations: 4.026 MB / 1.146 GB, free: 7.695 MB / 0.9044 GB Notification: Performance of NFConvertDAE.convert: time 0.01249/0.3804, allocations: 14.98 MB / 1.161 GB, free: 8.676 MB / 0.92 GB Notification: Performance of FrontEnd - DAE generated: time 4.709e-06/0.3805, allocations: 0 / 1.161 GB, free: 8.676 MB / 0.92 GB Notification: Performance of FrontEnd: time 1.282e-06/0.3805, allocations: 0 / 1.161 GB, free: 8.676 MB / 0.92 GB Notification: Performance of Transformations before backend: time 0.0002489/0.3807, allocations: 0 / 1.161 GB, free: 8.676 MB / 0.92 GB Notification: Model statistics after passing the front-end and creating the data structures used by the back-end: * Number of equations: 866 * Number of variables: 866 Notification: Performance of Generate backend data structure: time 0.02135/0.4021, allocations: 11.49 MB / 1.172 GB, free: 13.07 MB / 0.9356 GB Notification: Performance of prepare preOptimizeDAE: time 4.262e-05/0.4021, allocations: 11.97 kB / 1.172 GB, free: 13.06 MB / 0.9356 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt introduceOutputAliases (simulation): time 0.0007168/0.4029, allocations: 0.4925 MB / 1.172 GB, free: 12.56 MB / 0.9356 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt normalInlineFunction (simulation): time 0.001989/0.4049, allocations: 0.8769 MB / 1.173 GB, free: 11.67 MB / 0.9356 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt evaluateParameters (simulation): time 0.01708/0.4219, allocations: 9.422 MB / 1.183 GB, free: 2.172 MB / 0.9356 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt simplifyIfEquations (simulation): time 0.000235/0.4222, allocations: 338.8 kB / 1.183 GB, free: 1.84 MB / 0.9356 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt expandDerOperator (simulation): time 0.00101/0.4232, allocations: 483.8 kB / 1.183 GB, free: 1.367 MB / 0.9356 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt clockPartitioning (simulation): time 0.008234/0.4315, allocations: 5.956 MB / 1.189 GB, free: 11.18 MB / 0.9512 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt findStateOrder (simulation): time 6.224e-05/0.4316, allocations: 15.81 kB / 1.189 GB, free: 11.16 MB / 0.9512 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt replaceEdgeChange (simulation): time 0.0003348/0.4319, allocations: 144 kB / 1.189 GB, free: 11.02 MB / 0.9512 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt inlineArrayEqn (simulation): time 7.713e-05/0.432, allocations: 95.94 kB / 1.189 GB, free: 10.93 MB / 0.9512 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt removeEqualRHS (simulation): time 0.006474/0.4385, allocations: 4.766 MB / 1.194 GB, free: 6.148 MB / 0.9512 GB Warning: The model contains alias variables with redundant start and/or conflicting nominal values. It is recommended to resolve the conflicts, because otherwise the system could be hard to solve. To print the conflicting alias sets and the chosen candidates please use -d=aliasConflicts. Notification: Performance of preOpt removeSimpleEquations (simulation): time 0.04475/0.4832, allocations: 33.79 MB / 1.227 GB, free: 2.703 MB / 0.9825 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt comSubExp (simulation): time 0.01049/0.4937, allocations: 6.228 MB / 1.233 GB, free: 12.37 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt resolveLoops (simulation): time 0.003263/0.497, allocations: 2.501 MB / 1.236 GB, free: 9.859 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt evalFunc (simulation): time 0.4162/0.9133, allocations: 13.19 MB / 1.248 GB, free: 168.5 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt encapsulateWhenConditions (simulation): time 0.00282/0.9161, allocations: 2.142 MB / 1.251 GB, free: 168.4 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of pre-optimization done (n=224): time 4.238e-06/0.9161, allocations: 0 / 1.251 GB, free: 168.4 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of matching and sorting (n=232): time 0.023/0.9392, allocations: 14.02 MB / 1.264 GB, free: 165.5 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of inlineWhenForInitialization (initialization): time 5.757e-05/0.9392, allocations: 128.5 kB / 1.264 GB, free: 165.4 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of selectInitializationVariablesDAE (initialization): time 0.01675/0.956, allocations: 10.35 MB / 1.274 GB, free: 164.8 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of collectPreVariables (initialization): time 0.0007735/0.9568, allocations: 118.8 kB / 1.275 GB, free: 164.7 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of collectInitialEqns (initialization): time 0.00307/0.9599, allocations: 3.298 MB / 1.278 GB, free: 162.3 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of collectInitialBindings (initialization): time 0.001305/0.9612, allocations: 0.8809 MB / 1.279 GB, free: 161.7 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of simplifyInitialFunctions (initialization): time 0.001571/0.9628, allocations: 1.207 MB / 1.28 GB, free: 161.1 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of setup shared object (initialization): time 3.463e-05/0.9628, allocations: 302.2 kB / 1.28 GB, free: 160.8 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of preBalanceInitialSystem (initialization): time 0.004103/0.9669, allocations: 3.446 MB / 1.283 GB, free: 159.9 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of partitionIndependentBlocks (initialization): time 0.004473/0.9714, allocations: 5.937 MB / 1.289 GB, free: 155.8 MB / 0.9981 GB Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3])) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3])) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3])) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3])) Notification: Performance of analyzeInitialSystem (initialization): time 0.0389/1.01, allocations: 36.63 MB / 1.325 GB, free: 126.2 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of solveInitialSystemEqSystem (initialization): time 5.986e-05/1.01, allocations: 24 kB / 1.325 GB, free: 126.2 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of matching and sorting (n=659) (initialization): time 0.01189/1.022, allocations: 10.09 MB / 1.335 GB, free: 116 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of prepare postOptimizeDAE: time 5.535e-05/1.022, allocations: 65.7 kB / 1.335 GB, free: 115.9 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyComplexFunction (initialization): time 6.481e-05/1.022, allocations: 84.78 kB / 1.335 GB, free: 115.9 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt tearingSystem (initialization): time 0.001195/1.024, allocations: 0.7102 MB / 1.336 GB, free: 115.1 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt solveSimpleEquations (initialization): time 0.003846/1.028, allocations: 1.482 MB / 1.337 GB, free: 113.6 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt calculateStrongComponentJacobians (initialization): time 0.007045/1.035, allocations: 13.41 MB / 1.35 GB, free: 99.32 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyAllExpressions (initialization): time 0.007751/1.042, allocations: 1.303 MB / 1.352 GB, free: 98.02 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt collapseArrayExpressions (initialization): time 0.000474/1.043, allocations: 272 kB / 1.352 GB, free: 97.75 MB / 0.9981 GB Warning: The initial conditions are over specified. The following 8 initial equations are redundant, so they are removed from the initialization system: sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3]) sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3]) sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3]) sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]). Notification: Performance of preBalanceInitialSystem (initialization_lambda0): time 0.007243/1.05, allocations: 7.089 MB / 1.359 GB, free: 90.66 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of partitionIndependentBlocks (initialization_lambda0): time 0.004006/1.054, allocations: 5.932 MB / 1.365 GB, free: 83.52 MB / 0.9981 GB Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3])) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3])) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3])) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3])) Notification: Performance of analyzeInitialSystem (initialization_lambda0): time 0.03818/1.092, allocations: 36.57 MB / 1.4 GB, free: 45.51 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of solveInitialSystemEqSystem (initialization_lambda0): time 4.483e-05/1.092, allocations: 24 kB / 1.4 GB, free: 45.49 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of matching and sorting (n=659) (initialization_lambda0): time 0.01205/1.104, allocations: 10.08 MB / 1.41 GB, free: 35.33 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of prepare postOptimizeDAE: time 4.956e-05/1.104, allocations: 65.7 kB / 1.41 GB, free: 35.26 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyComplexFunction (initialization): time 7.734e-05/1.105, allocations: 84 kB / 1.41 GB, free: 35.18 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt tearingSystem (initialization): time 0.001149/1.106, allocations: 0.7086 MB / 1.411 GB, free: 34.45 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt solveSimpleEquations (initialization): time 0.003793/1.11, allocations: 1.483 MB / 1.412 GB, free: 32.96 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt calculateStrongComponentJacobians (initialization): time 0.007087/1.117, allocations: 13.4 MB / 1.425 GB, free: 18.65 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyAllExpressions (initialization): time 0.007605/1.124, allocations: 1.309 MB / 1.427 GB, free: 17.34 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt collapseArrayExpressions (initialization): time 0.0004814/1.125, allocations: 283.8 kB / 1.427 GB, free: 17.07 MB / 0.9981 GB Warning: The initial conditions are over specified. The following 8 initial equations are redundant, so they are removed from the initialization_lambda0 system: sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3]) sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3]) sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3]) sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]). Notification: Model statistics after passing the back-end for initialization: * Number of independent subsystems: 384 * Number of states: 0 () * Number of discrete variables: 5 ($PRE.pulse.count,$PRE.pulse.T_start,pulse.count,pulse.T_start,$whenCondition1) * Number of discrete states: 0 () * Number of clocked states: 0 () * Top-level inputs: 0 Notification: Strong component statistics for initialization (635): * Single equations (assignments): 627 * Array equations: 0 * Algorithm blocks: 1 * Record equations: 0 * When equations: 0 * If-equations: 0 * Equation systems (not torn): 0 * Torn equation systems: 7 * Mixed (continuous/discrete) equation systems: 0 Notification: Torn system details for strict tearing set: * Linear torn systems (#iteration vars, #inner vars, density): 7 systems {(1,9,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,9,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%)} * Non-linear torn systems (#iteration vars, #inner vars): 0 systems Notification: Performance of prepare postOptimizeDAE: time 0.00104/1.126, allocations: 0.7639 MB / 1.428 GB, free: 16.3 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt lateInlineFunction (simulation): time 0.001186/1.127, allocations: 0.6595 MB / 1.428 GB, free: 15.63 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt wrapFunctionCalls (simulation): time 0.006208/1.133, allocations: 5.144 MB / 1.433 GB, free: 10.45 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt inlineArrayEqn (simulation): time 1.588e-05/1.133, allocations: 31.94 kB / 1.433 GB, free: 10.42 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt constantLinearSystem (simulation): time 8.536e-06/1.133, allocations: 4 kB / 1.433 GB, free: 10.41 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifysemiLinear (simulation): time 0.0041/1.137, allocations: 3.962 MB / 1.437 GB, free: 6.418 MB / 0.9981 GB Warning: The model contains alias variables with redundant start and/or conflicting nominal values. It is recommended to resolve the conflicts, because otherwise the system could be hard to solve. To print the conflicting alias sets and the chosen candidates please use -d=aliasConflicts. Notification: Performance of postOpt removeSimpleEquations (simulation): time 0.01875/1.156, allocations: 13.39 MB / 1.45 GB, free: 8.863 MB / 1.014 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyComplexFunction (simulation): time 1.148e-05/1.156, allocations: 11.92 kB / 1.45 GB, free: 8.852 MB / 1.014 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt solveSimpleEquations (simulation): time 0.002352/1.158, allocations: 0.5972 MB / 1.451 GB, free: 8.254 MB / 1.014 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt tearingSystem (simulation): time 0.001199/1.16, allocations: 0.5794 MB / 1.452 GB, free: 7.652 MB / 1.014 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt inputDerivativesUsed (simulation): time 0.0002341/1.16, allocations: 135.9 kB / 1.452 GB, free: 7.52 MB / 1.014 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt calculateStrongComponentJacobians (simulation): time 0.01035/1.17, allocations: 13.29 MB / 1.465 GB, free: 9.312 MB / 1.029 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt calculateStateSetsJacobians (simulation): time 4.258e-06/1.17, allocations: 8.062 kB / 1.465 GB, free: 9.305 MB / 1.029 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt symbolicJacobian (simulation): time 0.01137/1.182, allocations: 7.11 MB / 1.472 GB, free: 2.105 MB / 1.029 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt removeConstants (simulation): time 0.003844/1.186, allocations: 1.66 MB / 1.473 GB, free: 424 kB / 1.029 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyTimeIndepFuncCalls (simulation): time 0.001156/1.187, allocations: 123.9 kB / 1.473 GB, free: 300 kB / 1.029 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyAllExpressions (simulation): time 0.003978/1.191, allocations: 0.7015 MB / 1.474 GB, free: 15.59 MB / 1.045 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt findZeroCrossings (simulation): time 0.0003955/1.191, allocations: 162.7 kB / 1.474 GB, free: 15.43 MB / 1.045 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt collapseArrayExpressions (simulation): time 0.0001923/1.191, allocations: 83.95 kB / 1.474 GB, free: 15.35 MB / 1.045 GB Notification: Performance of sorting global known variables: time 0.01105/1.202, allocations: 7.288 MB / 1.481 GB, free: 8.074 MB / 1.045 GB Notification: Performance of sort global known variables: time 3.61e-07/1.202, allocations: 0 / 1.481 GB, free: 8.074 MB / 1.045 GB Notification: Performance of remove unused functions: time 0.01204/1.214, allocations: 3.948 MB / 1.485 GB, free: 4.152 MB / 1.045 GB Notification: Model statistics after passing the back-end for simulation: * Number of independent subsystems: 12 * Number of states: 43 (sla.vol[1].dynBal.U,sla.vol[2].dynBal.U,sla.vol[3].dynBal.U,sla.vol[4].dynBal.U,sla.vol[5].dynBal.U,sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_b[1].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[2].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[3].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[4].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[5].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T[3],TOut.T) * Number of discrete variables: 3 ($whenCondition1,pulse.T_start,pulse.count) * Number of discrete states: 1 (pulse.count) * Number of clocked states: 0 () * Top-level inputs: 0 Notification: Strong component statistics for simulation (210): * Single equations (assignments): 199 * Array equations: 0 * Algorithm blocks: 0 * Record equations: 2 * When equations: 2 * If-equations: 0 * Equation systems (not torn): 0 * Torn equation systems: 7 * Mixed (continuous/discrete) equation systems: 0 Notification: Torn system details for strict tearing set: * Linear torn systems (#iteration vars, #inner vars, density): 7 systems {(1,9,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,9,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%)} * Non-linear torn systems (#iteration vars, #inner vars): 0 systems Notification: Performance of Backend phase and start with SimCode phase: time 0.01073/1.225, allocations: 8.177 MB / 1.493 GB, free: 11.95 MB / 1.061 GB Notification: Performance of simCode: created initialization part: time 0.01844/1.244, allocations: 13.39 MB / 1.506 GB, free: 14.38 MB / 1.076 GB Notification: Performance of simCode: created event and clocks part: time 9.267e-06/1.244, allocations: 6.188 kB / 1.506 GB, free: 14.38 MB / 1.076 GB Notification: Performance of simCode: created simulation system equations: time 0.004042/1.248, allocations: 3.048 MB / 1.509 GB, free: 11.24 MB / 1.076 GB Notification: Performance of simCode: created of all other equations (e.g. parameter, nominal, assert, etc): time 0.01151/1.259, allocations: 2.786 MB / 1.512 GB, free: 8.496 MB / 1.076 GB Notification: Performance of simCode: created linear, non-linear and system jacobian parts: time 0.3224/1.582, allocations: 101.7 MB / 1.611 GB, free: 10.89 MB / 1.186 GB Notification: Performance of simCode: some other stuff during SimCode phase: time 0.005959/1.588, allocations: 5.369 MB / 1.617 GB, free: 5.48 MB / 1.186 GB Notification: Performance of simCode: alias equations: time 0.01314/1.601, allocations: 6.382 MB / 1.623 GB, free: 15.1 MB / 1.201 GB Notification: Performance of simCode: all other stuff during SimCode phase: time 0.004619/1.606, allocations: 2.971 MB / 1.626 GB, free: 12.13 MB / 1.201 GB Notification: Performance of SimCode: time 6.92e-07/1.606, allocations: 0 / 1.626 GB, free: 12.13 MB / 1.201 GB Notification: Performance of buildModelFMU: Generate the FMI files: time 3.674/5.28, allocations: 202.4 MB / 1.823 GB, free: 381.8 MB / 1.295 GB Notification: Performance of buildModelFMU: configured platform static using cached values: time 0.0001797/5.28, allocations: 311.6 kB / 1.824 GB, free: 381.4 MB / 1.295 GB Notification: Performance of buildModelFMU: Generate platform static: time 6.497/11.78, allocations: 1.828 kB / 1.824 GB, free: 381.4 MB / 1.295 GB (rm -f Buildings_latest_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.pipe ; mkfifo Buildings_latest_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.pipe ; head -c 1048576 < Buildings_latest_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.pipe >> ../files/Buildings_latest_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.sim & /home/hudson/saved_omc/OMSimulator/install/bin/OMSimulator -r=Buildings_latest_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU_res.mat --tempDir=temp_Buildings_latest_Buildings_Fluid_HeatExchangers_RadiantSlabs_Examples_StepResponseEpsilonNTU_fmu --startTime=0 --stopTime=86400 --timeout=50 --tolerance=1e-06 Buildings_latest_Buildings_Fluid_HeatExchangers_RadiantSlabs_Examples_StepResponseEpsilonNTU.fmu > Buildings_latest_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.pipe 2>&1)