Running: ./testmodel.py --libraries=/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries --ompython_omhome=/usr Buildings_9_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.conf.json
loadFile("/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/ModelicaServices 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo", uses=false)
loadFile("/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Complex 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo", uses=false)
loadFile("/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Modelica 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo", uses=false)
loadFile("/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Buildings 9.1.2-maint.9.1.x/package.mo", uses=false)
Using package Buildings with version 9.1.2 (/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Buildings 9.1.2-maint.9.1.x/package.mo)
Using package Modelica with version 4.0.0 (/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Modelica 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo)
Using package Complex with version 4.0.0 (/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Complex 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo)
Using package ModelicaServices with version 4.0.0 (/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/ModelicaServices 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo)
Running command: "" <> buildModelFMU(Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU,fileNamePrefix="Buildings_9_Buildings_Fluid_HeatExchangers_RadiantSlabs_Examples_StepResponseEpsilonNTU",fmuType="me",version="2.0",platforms={"static"})
"" <> buildModelFMU(Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU,fileNamePrefix="Buildings_9_Buildings_Fluid_HeatExchangers_RadiantSlabs_Examples_StepResponseEpsilonNTU",fmuType="me",version="2.0",platforms={"static"})
Notification: Performance of loadFile(/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/ModelicaServices 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo): time 0.00142/0.00142, allocations: 111.3 kB / 15.23 MB, free: 0.6562 MB / 14.72 MB
Notification: Performance of loadFile(/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Complex 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo): time 0.001627/0.001627, allocations: 196.5 kB / 16.14 MB, free: 6.703 MB / 14.72 MB
Notification: Performance of loadFile(/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Modelica 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo): time 1.262/1.262, allocations: 222.9 MB / 239.8 MB, free: 4.59 MB / 190.1 MB
Notification: Performance of loadFile(/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Buildings 9.1.2-maint.9.1.x/package.mo): time 2.243/2.243, allocations: 390.2 MB / 0.6643 GB, free: 0.6523 MB / 0.5137 GB
Notification: Performance of FrontEnd - loaded program: time 0.001301/0.001301, allocations: 59.91 kB / 0.812 GB, free: 14.84 MB / 0.67 GB
Notification: Performance of FrontEnd - Absyn->SCode: time 0.5843/0.5856, allocations: 140.4 MB / 0.9491 GB, free: 9.199 MB / 0.7169 GB
Notification: Performance of NFInst.instantiate(Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU): time 0.02831/0.6139, allocations: 31.56 MB / 0.9799 GB, free: 15.98 MB / 0.7481 GB
Notification: Performance of NFInst.instExpressions: time 0.01862/0.6326, allocations: 12.43 MB / 0.992 GB, free: 6 MB / 0.7481 GB
Notification: Performance of NFInst.updateImplicitVariability: time 0.00249/0.6351, allocations: 55.09 kB / 0.9921 GB, free: 5.965 MB / 0.7481 GB
Notification: Performance of NFTyping.typeComponents: time 0.002984/0.6381, allocations: 0.976 MB / 0.993 GB, free: 4.984 MB / 0.7481 GB
Notification: Performance of NFTyping.typeBindings: time 0.005401/0.6436, allocations: 1.925 MB / 0.9949 GB, free: 3.055 MB / 0.7481 GB
Notification: Performance of NFTyping.typeClassSections: time 0.004662/0.6482, allocations: 1.631 MB / 0.9965 GB, free: 1.434 MB / 0.7481 GB
Notification: Performance of NFFlatten.flatten: time 0.01964/0.6679, allocations: 22.46 MB / 1.018 GB, free: 10.93 MB / 0.7794 GB
Notification: Performance of NFFlatten.resolveConnections: time 0.007683/0.6756, allocations: 5.574 MB / 1.024 GB, free: 5.277 MB / 0.7794 GB
Notification: Performance of NFEvalConstants.evaluate: time 0.009717/0.6854, allocations: 5.096 MB / 1.029 GB, free: 168 kB / 0.7794 GB
Notification: Performance of NFSimplifyModel.simplify: time 0.008584/0.694, allocations: 5.051 MB / 1.034 GB, free: 11.09 MB / 0.795 GB
Notification: Performance of NFPackage.collectConstants: time 0.001596/0.6956, allocations: 312 kB / 1.034 GB, free: 10.79 MB / 0.795 GB
Notification: Performance of NFFlatten.collectFunctions: time 0.006551/0.7022, allocations: 2.703 MB / 1.037 GB, free: 8.078 MB / 0.795 GB
Notification: Performance of NFScalarize.scalarize: time 0.002737/0.7049, allocations: 2.359 MB / 1.039 GB, free: 5.711 MB / 0.795 GB
Notification: Performance of NFVerifyModel.verify: time 0.006314/0.7112, allocations: 4.03 MB / 1.043 GB, free: 1.66 MB / 0.795 GB
Notification: Performance of NFConvertDAE.convert: time 0.01542/0.7267, allocations: 14.97 MB / 1.058 GB, free: 2.652 MB / 0.8106 GB
Notification: Performance of FrontEnd - DAE generated: time 5.931e-06/0.7267, allocations: 0 / 1.058 GB, free: 2.652 MB / 0.8106 GB
Notification: Performance of FrontEnd: time 3.176e-06/0.7267, allocations: 8 kB / 1.058 GB, free: 2.645 MB / 0.8106 GB
Notification: Performance of Transformations before backend: time 0.0003636/0.7271, allocations: 0 / 1.058 GB, free: 2.645 MB / 0.8106 GB
Notification: Model statistics after passing the front-end and creating the data structures used by the back-end:
 * Number of equations: 866
 * Number of variables: 866
Notification: Performance of Generate backend data structure: time 0.0265/0.7536, allocations: 11.49 MB / 1.069 GB, free: 7.043 MB / 0.8262 GB
Notification: Performance of prepare preOptimizeDAE: time 4.587e-05/0.7537, allocations: 12.03 kB / 1.069 GB, free: 7.031 MB / 0.8262 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt introduceOutputAliases (simulation): time 0.001031/0.7547, allocations: 496.3 kB / 1.069 GB, free: 6.535 MB / 0.8262 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt normalInlineFunction (simulation): time 0.002628/0.7574, allocations: 0.8725 MB / 1.07 GB, free: 5.652 MB / 0.8262 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt evaluateParameters (simulation): time 0.01893/0.7763, allocations: 9.43 MB / 1.079 GB, free: 12.14 MB / 0.8419 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt simplifyIfEquations (simulation): time 0.0002964/0.7766, allocations: 330.8 kB / 1.08 GB, free: 11.82 MB / 0.8419 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt expandDerOperator (simulation): time 0.001409/0.7781, allocations: 487.8 kB / 1.08 GB, free: 11.34 MB / 0.8419 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt clockPartitioning (simulation): time 0.009147/0.7872, allocations: 5.952 MB / 1.086 GB, free: 5.156 MB / 0.8419 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt findStateOrder (simulation): time 6.668e-05/0.7873, allocations: 15.88 kB / 1.086 GB, free: 5.141 MB / 0.8419 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt replaceEdgeChange (simulation): time 0.000348/0.7877, allocations: 147.9 kB / 1.086 GB, free: 4.996 MB / 0.8419 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt inlineArrayEqn (simulation): time 8.918e-05/0.7878, allocations: 99.98 kB / 1.086 GB, free: 4.898 MB / 0.8419 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt removeEqualRHS (simulation): time 0.007183/0.795, allocations: 4.762 MB / 1.091 GB, free: 128 kB / 0.8419 GB
Warning: The model contains alias variables with redundant start and/or conflicting nominal values. It is recommended to resolve the conflicts, because otherwise the system could be hard to solve. To print the conflicting alias sets and the chosen candidates please use -d=aliasConflicts.
Notification: Performance of preOpt removeSimpleEquations (simulation): time 0.04957/0.8446, allocations: 33.78 MB / 1.124 GB, free: 12.7 MB / 0.8887 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt comSubExp (simulation): time 0.01082/0.8554, allocations: 6.232 MB / 1.13 GB, free: 6.359 MB / 0.8887 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt resolveLoops (simulation): time 0.003345/0.8588, allocations: 2.509 MB / 1.132 GB, free: 3.844 MB / 0.8887 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt evalFunc (simulation): time 0.0216/0.8804, allocations: 13.2 MB / 1.145 GB, free: 6.098 MB / 0.9044 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt encapsulateWhenConditions (simulation): time 0.002874/0.8833, allocations: 2.137 MB / 1.147 GB, free: 3.938 MB / 0.9044 GB
Notification: Performance of pre-optimization done (n=224): time 4.258e-06/0.8833, allocations: 0 / 1.147 GB, free: 3.938 MB / 0.9044 GB
Notification: Performance of matching and sorting (n=232): time 0.02302/0.9063, allocations: 14.01 MB / 1.161 GB, free: 5.738 MB / 0.92 GB
Notification: Performance of inlineWhenForInitialization (initialization): time 7.874e-05/0.9064, allocations: 136.7 kB / 1.161 GB, free: 5.582 MB / 0.92 GB
Notification: Performance of selectInitializationVariablesDAE (initialization): time 0.01541/0.9218, allocations: 10.36 MB / 1.171 GB, free: 11.23 MB / 0.9356 GB
Notification: Performance of collectPreVariables (initialization): time 0.0008768/0.9228, allocations: 117.7 kB / 1.171 GB, free: 11.11 MB / 0.9356 GB
Notification: Performance of collectInitialEqns (initialization): time 0.003395/0.9262, allocations: 3.301 MB / 1.175 GB, free: 7.785 MB / 0.9356 GB
Notification: Performance of collectInitialBindings (initialization): time 0.001631/0.9278, allocations: 0.8707 MB / 1.175 GB, free: 6.902 MB / 0.9356 GB
Notification: Performance of simplifyInitialFunctions (initialization): time 0.001712/0.9295, allocations: 1.209 MB / 1.177 GB, free: 5.684 MB / 0.9356 GB
Notification: Performance of setup shared object (initialization): time 8.506e-05/0.9296, allocations: 301.1 kB / 1.177 GB, free: 5.387 MB / 0.9356 GB
Notification: Performance of preBalanceInitialSystem (initialization): time 0.004685/0.9343, allocations: 3.447 MB / 1.18 GB, free: 1.922 MB / 0.9356 GB
Notification: Performance of partitionIndependentBlocks (initialization): time 0.006799/0.9411, allocations: 5.936 MB / 1.186 GB, free: 10.78 MB / 0.9512 GB
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3]))
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3]))
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3]))
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]))
Notification: Performance of analyzeInitialSystem (initialization): time 0.05382/0.995, allocations: 36.64 MB / 1.222 GB, free: 4.691 MB / 0.9825 GB
Notification: Performance of solveInitialSystemEqSystem (initialization): time 6.629e-05/0.9951, allocations: 24 kB / 1.222 GB, free: 4.668 MB / 0.9825 GB
Notification: Performance of matching and sorting (n=659) (initialization): time 0.01624/1.011, allocations: 10.07 MB / 1.232 GB, free: 10.51 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of prepare postOptimizeDAE: time 9.523e-05/1.011, allocations: 73.64 kB / 1.232 GB, free: 10.43 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyComplexFunction (initialization): time 0.0001207/1.012, allocations: 87.94 kB / 1.232 GB, free: 10.35 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt tearingSystem (initialization): time 0.001639/1.013, allocations: 0.7129 MB / 1.233 GB, free: 9.613 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt solveSimpleEquations (initialization): time 0.004846/1.018, allocations: 1.482 MB / 1.234 GB, free: 8.129 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt calculateStrongComponentJacobians (initialization): time 0.01085/1.029, allocations: 13.4 MB / 1.247 GB, free: 9.797 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyAllExpressions (initialization): time 0.008338/1.037, allocations: 1.31 MB / 1.248 GB, free: 8.484 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt collapseArrayExpressions (initialization): time 0.0008068/1.038, allocations: 276.1 kB / 1.249 GB, free: 8.215 MB / 1.014 GB
Warning: The initial conditions are over specified. The following 8 initial equations are redundant, so they are removed from the initialization system:
         sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start
         sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start
         sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start
         sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start
         sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3])
         sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3])
         sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3])
         sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]).
Notification: Performance of preBalanceInitialSystem (initialization_lambda0): time 0.01044/1.049, allocations: 7.098 MB / 1.256 GB, free: 1.105 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of partitionIndependentBlocks (initialization_lambda0): time 0.4713/1.52, allocations: 5.928 MB / 1.261 GB, free: 268.7 MB / 1.014 GB
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3]))
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3]))
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3]))
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]))
Notification: Performance of analyzeInitialSystem (initialization_lambda0): time 0.05474/1.575, allocations: 36.56 MB / 1.297 GB, free: 254 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of solveInitialSystemEqSystem (initialization_lambda0): time 0.0001571/1.575, allocations: 23.75 kB / 1.297 GB, free: 254 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of matching and sorting (n=659) (initialization_lambda0): time 0.016/1.591, allocations: 10.07 MB / 1.307 GB, free: 248.8 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of prepare postOptimizeDAE: time 0.0001214/1.591, allocations: 70.39 kB / 1.307 GB, free: 248.7 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyComplexFunction (initialization): time 0.0001253/1.591, allocations: 84 kB / 1.307 GB, free: 248.6 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt tearingSystem (initialization): time 0.001449/1.593, allocations: 0.7156 MB / 1.308 GB, free: 247.9 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt solveSimpleEquations (initialization): time 0.004914/1.597, allocations: 1.478 MB / 1.309 GB, free: 246.4 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt calculateStrongComponentJacobians (initialization): time 0.008187/1.606, allocations: 13.41 MB / 1.322 GB, free: 232.2 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyAllExpressions (initialization): time 0.009072/1.615, allocations: 1.304 MB / 1.324 GB, free: 230.9 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt collapseArrayExpressions (initialization): time 0.001204/1.616, allocations: 276 kB / 1.324 GB, free: 230.6 MB / 1.014 GB
Warning: The initial conditions are over specified. The following 8 initial equations are redundant, so they are removed from the initialization_lambda0 system:
         sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start
         sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start
         sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start
         sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start
         sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3])
         sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3])
         sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3])
         sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]).
Notification: Model statistics after passing the back-end for initialization:
 * Number of independent subsystems: 384
 * Number of states: 0 ()
 * Number of discrete variables: 5 ($PRE.pulse.count,$PRE.pulse.T_start,pulse.count,pulse.T_start,$whenCondition1)
 * Number of discrete states: 0 ()
 * Number of clocked states: 0 ()
 * Top-level inputs: 0
Notification: Strong component statistics for initialization (635):
 * Single equations (assignments): 627
 * Array equations: 0
 * Algorithm blocks: 1
 * Record equations: 0
 * When equations: 0
 * If-equations: 0
 * Equation systems (not torn): 0
 * Torn equation systems: 7
 * Mixed (continuous/discrete) equation systems: 0
Notification: Torn system details for strict tearing set:
 * Linear torn systems (#iteration vars, #inner vars, density): 7 systems
   {(1,9,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,9,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%)}
 * Non-linear torn systems (#iteration vars, #inner vars): 0 systems
Notification: Performance of prepare postOptimizeDAE: time 0.002093/1.618, allocations: 0.7556 MB / 1.325 GB, free: 229.9 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt lateInlineFunction (simulation): time 0.002276/1.62, allocations: 0.6605 MB / 1.325 GB, free: 229.6 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt wrapFunctionCalls (simulation): time 0.008187/1.629, allocations: 5.149 MB / 1.33 GB, free: 224.5 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt inlineArrayEqn (simulation): time 1.926e-05/1.629, allocations: 23.94 kB / 1.33 GB, free: 224.4 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt constantLinearSystem (simulation): time 1.615e-05/1.629, allocations: 11.98 kB / 1.33 GB, free: 224.4 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifysemiLinear (simulation): time 0.004773/1.633, allocations: 3.956 MB / 1.334 GB, free: 220.4 MB / 1.014 GB
Warning: The model contains alias variables with redundant start and/or conflicting nominal values. It is recommended to resolve the conflicts, because otherwise the system could be hard to solve. To print the conflicting alias sets and the chosen candidates please use -d=aliasConflicts.
Notification: Performance of postOpt removeSimpleEquations (simulation): time 0.02307/1.657, allocations: 13.39 MB / 1.347 GB, free: 206.9 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyComplexFunction (simulation): time 1.193e-05/1.657, allocations: 7.938 kB / 1.347 GB, free: 206.9 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt solveSimpleEquations (simulation): time 0.002391/1.659, allocations: 0.5968 MB / 1.348 GB, free: 206.3 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt tearingSystem (simulation): time 0.001252/1.66, allocations: 0.5826 MB / 1.348 GB, free: 205.7 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt inputDerivativesUsed (simulation): time 0.000329/1.661, allocations: 135.9 kB / 1.349 GB, free: 205.5 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt calculateStrongComponentJacobians (simulation): time 0.007714/1.668, allocations: 13.27 MB / 1.361 GB, free: 191.4 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt calculateStateSetsJacobians (simulation): time 4.038e-06/1.668, allocations: 8.031 kB / 1.361 GB, free: 191.4 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt symbolicJacobian (simulation): time 0.009568/1.678, allocations: 7.113 MB / 1.368 GB, free: 184.6 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt removeConstants (simulation): time 0.003927/1.682, allocations: 1.657 MB / 1.37 GB, free: 182.9 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyTimeIndepFuncCalls (simulation): time 0.002019/1.684, allocations: 131.3 kB / 1.37 GB, free: 182.8 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyAllExpressions (simulation): time 0.005101/1.689, allocations: 0.705 MB / 1.371 GB, free: 182.1 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt findZeroCrossings (simulation): time 0.0004516/1.689, allocations: 157.7 kB / 1.371 GB, free: 181.9 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt collapseArrayExpressions (simulation): time 0.0002448/1.69, allocations: 87.95 kB / 1.371 GB, free: 181.8 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of sorting global known variables: time 0.01222/1.702, allocations: 7.288 MB / 1.378 GB, free: 174.6 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of sort global known variables: time 3.31e-07/1.702, allocations: 0 / 1.378 GB, free: 174.6 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of remove unused functions: time 0.0142/1.716, allocations: 3.949 MB / 1.382 GB, free: 170.6 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Model statistics after passing the back-end for simulation:
 * Number of independent subsystems: 12
 * Number of states: 43 (sla.vol[1].dynBal.U,sla.vol[2].dynBal.U,sla.vol[3].dynBal.U,sla.vol[4].dynBal.U,sla.vol[5].dynBal.U,sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_b[1].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[2].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[3].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[4].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[5].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T[3],TOut.T)
 * Number of discrete variables: 3 ($whenCondition1,pulse.T_start,pulse.count)
 * Number of discrete states: 1 (pulse.count)
 * Number of clocked states: 0 ()
 * Top-level inputs: 0
Notification: Strong component statistics for simulation (210):
 * Single equations (assignments): 199
 * Array equations: 0
 * Algorithm blocks: 0
 * Record equations: 2
 * When equations: 2
 * If-equations: 0
 * Equation systems (not torn): 0
 * Torn equation systems: 7
 * Mixed (continuous/discrete) equation systems: 0
Notification: Torn system details for strict tearing set:
 * Linear torn systems (#iteration vars, #inner vars, density): 7 systems
   {(1,9,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,9,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%)}
 * Non-linear torn systems (#iteration vars, #inner vars): 0 systems
Notification: Performance of Backend phase and start with SimCode phase: time 0.01266/1.729, allocations: 8.194 MB / 1.39 GB, free: 162.4 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of simCode: created initialization part: time 0.01655/1.745, allocations: 13.4 MB / 1.403 GB, free: 148.9 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of simCode: created event and clocks part: time 8.496e-06/1.746, allocations: 4 kB / 1.403 GB, free: 148.9 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of simCode: created simulation system equations: time 0.003511/1.749, allocations: 3.036 MB / 1.406 GB, free: 145.7 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of simCode: created of all other equations (e.g. parameter, nominal, assert, etc): time 0.01171/1.761, allocations: 2.777 MB / 1.409 GB, free: 143 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of simCode: created linear, non-linear and system jacobian parts: time 0.3027/2.063, allocations: 101.7 MB / 1.508 GB, free: 33.44 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of simCode: some other stuff during SimCode phase: time 0.004118/2.068, allocations: 5.381 MB / 1.513 GB, free: 28.02 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of simCode: alias equations: time 0.01117/2.079, allocations: 6.384 MB / 1.52 GB, free: 21.64 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of simCode: all other stuff during SimCode phase: time 0.003771/2.083, allocations: 2.975 MB / 1.523 GB, free: 18.67 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of SimCode: time 6.91e-07/2.083, allocations: 0 / 1.523 GB, free: 18.67 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of buildModelFMU: Generate the FMI files: time 0.8035/2.886, allocations: 202.4 MB / 1.72 GB, free: 394.7 MB / 1.17 GB
Notification: Performance of buildModelFMU: configured platform static using cached values: time 0.000167/2.886, allocations: 291.3 kB / 1.721 GB, free: 394.3 MB / 1.17 GB
Notification: Performance of buildModelFMU: Generate platform static: time 6.036/8.922, allocations: 1.719 kB / 1.721 GB, free: 394.3 MB / 1.17 GB
(rm -f Buildings_9_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.pipe ; mkfifo Buildings_9_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.pipe ; head -c 1048576 < Buildings_9_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.pipe >> ../files/Buildings_9_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.sim & /home/hudson/saved_omc/OMSimulator/install/bin/OMSimulator -r=Buildings_9_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU_res.mat --tempDir=temp_Buildings_9_Buildings_Fluid_HeatExchangers_RadiantSlabs_Examples_StepResponseEpsilonNTU_fmu --startTime=0 --stopTime=86400 --timeout=50 --tolerance=1e-06 Buildings_9_Buildings_Fluid_HeatExchangers_RadiantSlabs_Examples_StepResponseEpsilonNTU.fmu > Buildings_9_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.pipe 2>&1)