Running: ./testmodel.py --libraries=/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries --ompython_omhome=/usr Buildings_10_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.conf.json loadFile("/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/ModelicaServices 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo", uses=false) loadFile("/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Complex 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo", uses=false) loadFile("/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Modelica 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo", uses=false) loadFile("/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Buildings 10.1.0-maint.10.0.x/package.mo", uses=false) Using package Buildings with version 10.1.0 (/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Buildings 10.1.0-maint.10.0.x/package.mo) Using package Modelica with version 4.0.0 (/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Modelica 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo) Using package Complex with version 4.0.0 (/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Complex 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo) Using package ModelicaServices with version 4.0.0 (/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/ModelicaServices 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo) Running command: "" <> buildModelFMU(Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU,fileNamePrefix="Buildings_10_Buildings_Fluid_HeatExchangers_RadiantSlabs_Examples_StepResponseEpsilonNTU",fmuType="me",version="2.0",platforms={"static"}) "" <> buildModelFMU(Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU,fileNamePrefix="Buildings_10_Buildings_Fluid_HeatExchangers_RadiantSlabs_Examples_StepResponseEpsilonNTU",fmuType="me",version="2.0",platforms={"static"}) Notification: Performance of loadFile(/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/ModelicaServices 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo): time 0.001499/0.001504, allocations: 111.3 kB / 15.23 MB, free: 0.6406 MB / 14.72 MB Notification: Performance of loadFile(/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Complex 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo): time 0.001732/0.001732, allocations: 196.8 kB / 16.14 MB, free: 6.719 MB / 14.72 MB Notification: Performance of loadFile(/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Modelica 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo): time 1.425/1.425, allocations: 222.9 MB / 239.8 MB, free: 4.551 MB / 190.1 MB Notification: Performance of loadFile(/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Buildings 10.1.0-maint.10.0.x/package.mo): time 2.347/2.347, allocations: 437 MB / 0.7099 GB, free: 5.348 MB / 0.5606 GB Notification: Performance of FrontEnd - loaded program: time 0.001156/0.001156, allocations: 63.89 kB / 0.8687 GB, free: 5.125 MB / 0.7169 GB Notification: Performance of FrontEnd - Absyn->SCode: time 0.4826/0.4838, allocations: 151.6 MB / 1.017 GB, free: 2.785 MB / 0.7637 GB Notification: Performance of NFInst.instantiate(Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU): time 0.02731/0.5111, allocations: 31.56 MB / 1.048 GB, free: 3.113 MB / 0.795 GB Notification: Performance of NFInst.instExpressions: time 0.01482/0.526, allocations: 12.45 MB / 1.06 GB, free: 6.625 MB / 0.8106 GB Notification: Performance of NFInst.updateImplicitVariability: time 0.001052/0.527, allocations: 55.69 kB / 1.06 GB, free: 6.57 MB / 0.8106 GB Notification: Performance of NFTyping.typeComponents: time 0.00222/0.5293, allocations: 0.9799 MB / 1.061 GB, free: 5.586 MB / 0.8106 GB Notification: Performance of NFTyping.typeBindings: time 0.003274/0.5326, allocations: 1.914 MB / 1.063 GB, free: 3.668 MB / 0.8106 GB Notification: Performance of NFTyping.typeClassSections: time 0.003212/0.5358, allocations: 1.639 MB / 1.064 GB, free: 2.035 MB / 0.8106 GB Notification: Performance of NFFlatten.flatten: time 0.01771/0.5535, allocations: 22.44 MB / 1.086 GB, free: 11.54 MB / 0.8419 GB Notification: Performance of NFFlatten.resolveConnections: time 0.005916/0.5595, allocations: 5.562 MB / 1.092 GB, free: 5.902 MB / 0.8419 GB Notification: Performance of NFEvalConstants.evaluate: time 0.006331/0.5658, allocations: 5.108 MB / 1.097 GB, free: 0.7773 MB / 0.8419 GB Notification: Performance of NFSimplifyModel.simplify: time 0.005475/0.5713, allocations: 5.043 MB / 1.101 GB, free: 11.71 MB / 0.8575 GB Notification: Performance of NFPackage.collectConstants: time 0.0006869/0.572, allocations: 315.9 kB / 1.102 GB, free: 11.41 MB / 0.8575 GB Notification: Performance of NFFlatten.collectFunctions: time 0.004762/0.5768, allocations: 2.703 MB / 1.104 GB, free: 8.699 MB / 0.8575 GB Notification: Performance of NFScalarize.scalarize: time 0.001996/0.5788, allocations: 2.367 MB / 1.107 GB, free: 6.324 MB / 0.8575 GB Notification: Performance of NFVerifyModel.verify: time 0.003932/0.5827, allocations: 4.026 MB / 1.111 GB, free: 2.277 MB / 0.8575 GB Notification: Performance of NFConvertDAE.convert: time 0.01155/0.5943, allocations: 14.97 MB / 1.125 GB, free: 3.262 MB / 0.8731 GB Notification: Performance of FrontEnd - DAE generated: time 3.336e-06/0.5943, allocations: 0 / 1.125 GB, free: 3.262 MB / 0.8731 GB Notification: Performance of FrontEnd: time 1.002e-06/0.5943, allocations: 0 / 1.125 GB, free: 3.262 MB / 0.8731 GB Notification: Performance of Transformations before backend: time 0.00015/0.5945, allocations: 4 kB / 1.125 GB, free: 3.258 MB / 0.8731 GB Notification: Model statistics after passing the front-end and creating the data structures used by the back-end: * Number of equations: 866 * Number of variables: 866 Notification: Performance of Generate backend data structure: time 0.01989/0.6144, allocations: 11.5 MB / 1.136 GB, free: 7.652 MB / 0.8887 GB Notification: Performance of prepare preOptimizeDAE: time 4.386e-05/0.6144, allocations: 8.031 kB / 1.136 GB, free: 7.645 MB / 0.8887 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt introduceOutputAliases (simulation): time 0.0006495/0.6151, allocations: 496.3 kB / 1.137 GB, free: 7.148 MB / 0.8887 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt normalInlineFunction (simulation): time 0.001801/0.6169, allocations: 0.8769 MB / 1.138 GB, free: 6.262 MB / 0.8887 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt evaluateParameters (simulation): time 0.01482/0.6317, allocations: 9.419 MB / 1.147 GB, free: 12.77 MB / 0.9044 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt simplifyIfEquations (simulation): time 0.0002056/0.6319, allocations: 338.7 kB / 1.147 GB, free: 12.43 MB / 0.9044 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt expandDerOperator (simulation): time 0.000677/0.6326, allocations: 479.8 kB / 1.148 GB, free: 11.96 MB / 0.9044 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt clockPartitioning (simulation): time 0.007917/0.6405, allocations: 5.965 MB / 1.154 GB, free: 5.766 MB / 0.9044 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt findStateOrder (simulation): time 5.876e-05/0.6406, allocations: 7.938 kB / 1.154 GB, free: 5.758 MB / 0.9044 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt replaceEdgeChange (simulation): time 0.0003321/0.641, allocations: 148 kB / 1.154 GB, free: 5.613 MB / 0.9044 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt inlineArrayEqn (simulation): time 7.838e-05/0.641, allocations: 103.9 kB / 1.154 GB, free: 5.512 MB / 0.9044 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt removeEqualRHS (simulation): time 0.006377/0.6474, allocations: 4.762 MB / 1.159 GB, free: 0.7383 MB / 0.9044 GB Warning: The model contains alias variables with redundant start and/or conflicting nominal values. It is recommended to resolve the conflicts, because otherwise the system could be hard to solve. To print the conflicting alias sets and the chosen candidates please use -d=aliasConflicts. Notification: Performance of preOpt removeSimpleEquations (simulation): time 0.04237/0.6898, allocations: 33.78 MB / 1.192 GB, free: 13.3 MB / 0.9512 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt comSubExp (simulation): time 0.01022/0.7, allocations: 6.224 MB / 1.198 GB, free: 6.973 MB / 0.9512 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt resolveLoops (simulation): time 0.003239/0.7033, allocations: 2.505 MB / 1.2 GB, free: 4.469 MB / 0.9512 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt evalFunc (simulation): time 0.0189/0.7222, allocations: 13.2 MB / 1.213 GB, free: 6.727 MB / 0.9669 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt encapsulateWhenConditions (simulation): time 0.002742/0.725, allocations: 2.141 MB / 1.215 GB, free: 4.562 MB / 0.9669 GB Notification: Performance of pre-optimization done (n=224): time 3.496e-06/0.725, allocations: 0 / 1.215 GB, free: 4.562 MB / 0.9669 GB Notification: Performance of matching and sorting (n=232): time 0.01939/0.7444, allocations: 14.01 MB / 1.229 GB, free: 6.359 MB / 0.9825 GB Notification: Performance of inlineWhenForInitialization (initialization): time 6.768e-05/0.7445, allocations: 132.8 kB / 1.229 GB, free: 6.207 MB / 0.9825 GB Notification: Performance of selectInitializationVariablesDAE (initialization): time 0.01346/0.7579, allocations: 10.35 MB / 1.239 GB, free: 11.86 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of collectPreVariables (initialization): time 0.0003968/0.7583, allocations: 125.7 kB / 1.239 GB, free: 11.73 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of collectInitialEqns (initialization): time 0.003036/0.7614, allocations: 3.301 MB / 1.242 GB, free: 8.406 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of collectInitialBindings (initialization): time 0.001158/0.7625, allocations: 0.8708 MB / 1.243 GB, free: 7.523 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of simplifyInitialFunctions (initialization): time 0.001536/0.7641, allocations: 1.205 MB / 1.244 GB, free: 6.309 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of setup shared object (initialization): time 8.079e-05/0.7642, allocations: 301.1 kB / 1.245 GB, free: 6.012 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of preBalanceInitialSystem (initialization): time 0.004358/0.7685, allocations: 3.451 MB / 1.248 GB, free: 2.543 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of partitionIndependentBlocks (initialization): time 0.3891/1.158, allocations: 5.93 MB / 1.254 GB, free: 204.1 MB / 0.9981 GB Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3])) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3])) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3])) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3])) Notification: Performance of analyzeInitialSystem (initialization): time 0.04785/1.206, allocations: 36.64 MB / 1.29 GB, free: 190.9 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of solveInitialSystemEqSystem (initialization): time 0.0001129/1.206, allocations: 26.56 kB / 1.29 GB, free: 190.9 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of matching and sorting (n=659) (initialization): time 0.01174/1.217, allocations: 10.08 MB / 1.299 GB, free: 184.2 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of prepare postOptimizeDAE: time 6.402e-05/1.217, allocations: 65.7 kB / 1.299 GB, free: 184.2 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyComplexFunction (initialization): time 6.209e-05/1.218, allocations: 84 kB / 1.3 GB, free: 184.1 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt tearingSystem (initialization): time 0.001183/1.219, allocations: 0.7145 MB / 1.3 GB, free: 183.3 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt solveSimpleEquations (initialization): time 0.003877/1.223, allocations: 1.478 MB / 1.302 GB, free: 181.9 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt calculateStrongComponentJacobians (initialization): time 0.007229/1.23, allocations: 13.41 MB / 1.315 GB, free: 167.6 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyAllExpressions (initialization): time 0.00704/1.237, allocations: 1.306 MB / 1.316 GB, free: 166.3 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt collapseArrayExpressions (initialization): time 0.0003371/1.237, allocations: 268 kB / 1.316 GB, free: 166.1 MB / 0.9981 GB Warning: The initial conditions are over specified. The following 8 initial equations are redundant, so they are removed from the initialization system: sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3]) sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3]) sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3]) sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]). Notification: Performance of preBalanceInitialSystem (initialization_lambda0): time 0.006847/1.244, allocations: 7.083 MB / 1.323 GB, free: 159 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of partitionIndependentBlocks (initialization_lambda0): time 0.0041/1.248, allocations: 5.94 MB / 1.329 GB, free: 151.8 MB / 0.9981 GB Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3])) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3])) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3])) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3])) Notification: Performance of analyzeInitialSystem (initialization_lambda0): time 0.03874/1.287, allocations: 36.57 MB / 1.365 GB, free: 113.8 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of solveInitialSystemEqSystem (initialization_lambda0): time 4.001e-05/1.287, allocations: 24 kB / 1.365 GB, free: 113.8 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of matching and sorting (n=659) (initialization_lambda0): time 0.01151/1.299, allocations: 10.07 MB / 1.375 GB, free: 104 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of prepare postOptimizeDAE: time 4.616e-05/1.299, allocations: 73.69 kB / 1.375 GB, free: 103.9 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyComplexFunction (initialization): time 4.945e-05/1.299, allocations: 84 kB / 1.375 GB, free: 103.8 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt tearingSystem (initialization): time 0.001117/1.3, allocations: 0.7108 MB / 1.375 GB, free: 103.1 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt solveSimpleEquations (initialization): time 0.003876/1.304, allocations: 1.478 MB / 1.377 GB, free: 101.6 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt calculateStrongComponentJacobians (initialization): time 0.00719/1.311, allocations: 13.41 MB / 1.39 GB, free: 87.37 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyAllExpressions (initialization): time 0.006991/1.318, allocations: 1.307 MB / 1.391 GB, free: 86.1 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt collapseArrayExpressions (initialization): time 0.0003239/1.318, allocations: 276 kB / 1.392 GB, free: 85.83 MB / 0.9981 GB Warning: The initial conditions are over specified. The following 8 initial equations are redundant, so they are removed from the initialization_lambda0 system: sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3]) sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3]) sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3]) sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]). Notification: Model statistics after passing the back-end for initialization: * Number of independent subsystems: 384 * Number of states: 0 () * Number of discrete variables: 5 ($PRE.pulse.count,$PRE.pulse.T_start,pulse.count,pulse.T_start,$whenCondition1) * Number of discrete states: 0 () * Number of clocked states: 0 () * Top-level inputs: 0 Notification: Strong component statistics for initialization (635): * Single equations (assignments): 627 * Array equations: 0 * Algorithm blocks: 1 * Record equations: 0 * When equations: 0 * If-equations: 0 * Equation systems (not torn): 0 * Torn equation systems: 7 * Mixed (continuous/discrete) equation systems: 0 Notification: Torn system details for strict tearing set: * Linear torn systems (#iteration vars, #inner vars, density): 7 systems {(1,9,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,9,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%)} * Non-linear torn systems (#iteration vars, #inner vars): 0 systems Notification: Performance of prepare postOptimizeDAE: time 0.001107/1.319, allocations: 0.7691 MB / 1.392 GB, free: 85.11 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt lateInlineFunction (simulation): time 0.0007755/1.32, allocations: 0.662 MB / 1.393 GB, free: 84.76 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt wrapFunctionCalls (simulation): time 0.006208/1.326, allocations: 5.147 MB / 1.398 GB, free: 79.58 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt inlineArrayEqn (simulation): time 1.449e-05/1.326, allocations: 20.98 kB / 1.398 GB, free: 79.56 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt constantLinearSystem (simulation): time 8.376e-06/1.326, allocations: 12 kB / 1.398 GB, free: 79.55 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifysemiLinear (simulation): time 0.004255/1.331, allocations: 3.962 MB / 1.402 GB, free: 75.55 MB / 0.9981 GB Warning: The model contains alias variables with redundant start and/or conflicting nominal values. It is recommended to resolve the conflicts, because otherwise the system could be hard to solve. To print the conflicting alias sets and the chosen candidates please use -d=aliasConflicts. Notification: Performance of postOpt removeSimpleEquations (simulation): time 0.01561/1.346, allocations: 13.38 MB / 1.415 GB, free: 62.01 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyComplexFunction (simulation): time 8.866e-06/1.346, allocations: 4 kB / 1.415 GB, free: 62 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt solveSimpleEquations (simulation): time 0.00215/1.348, allocations: 0.6113 MB / 1.416 GB, free: 61.39 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt tearingSystem (simulation): time 0.0009842/1.349, allocations: 0.5795 MB / 1.416 GB, free: 60.79 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt inputDerivativesUsed (simulation): time 0.0001994/1.35, allocations: 131.9 kB / 1.416 GB, free: 60.66 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt calculateStrongComponentJacobians (simulation): time 0.007098/1.357, allocations: 13.28 MB / 1.429 GB, free: 46.46 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt calculateStateSetsJacobians (simulation): time 2.585e-06/1.357, allocations: 4 kB / 1.429 GB, free: 46.45 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt symbolicJacobian (simulation): time 0.007556/1.364, allocations: 7.125 MB / 1.436 GB, free: 39.25 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt removeConstants (simulation): time 0.002642/1.367, allocations: 1.656 MB / 1.438 GB, free: 37.56 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyTimeIndepFuncCalls (simulation): time 0.000814/1.368, allocations: 123.9 kB / 1.438 GB, free: 37.44 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyAllExpressions (simulation): time 0.003659/1.371, allocations: 0.7047 MB / 1.439 GB, free: 36.75 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt findZeroCrossings (simulation): time 0.0003418/1.372, allocations: 165.6 kB / 1.439 GB, free: 36.58 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt collapseArrayExpressions (simulation): time 0.0001631/1.372, allocations: 91.34 kB / 1.439 GB, free: 36.5 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of sorting global known variables: time 0.007944/1.38, allocations: 7.284 MB / 1.446 GB, free: 29.22 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of sort global known variables: time 1.91e-07/1.38, allocations: 0 / 1.446 GB, free: 29.22 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of remove unused functions: time 0.009162/1.389, allocations: 3.951 MB / 1.45 GB, free: 25.31 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Model statistics after passing the back-end for simulation: * Number of independent subsystems: 12 * Number of states: 43 (sla.vol[1].dynBal.U,sla.vol[2].dynBal.U,sla.vol[3].dynBal.U,sla.vol[4].dynBal.U,sla.vol[5].dynBal.U,sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_b[1].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[2].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[3].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[4].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[5].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T[3],TOut.T) * Number of discrete variables: 3 ($whenCondition1,pulse.T_start,pulse.count) * Number of discrete states: 1 (pulse.count) * Number of clocked states: 0 () * Top-level inputs: 0 Notification: Strong component statistics for simulation (210): * Single equations (assignments): 199 * Array equations: 0 * Algorithm blocks: 0 * Record equations: 2 * When equations: 2 * If-equations: 0 * Equation systems (not torn): 0 * Torn equation systems: 7 * Mixed (continuous/discrete) equation systems: 0 Notification: Torn system details for strict tearing set: * Linear torn systems (#iteration vars, #inner vars, density): 7 systems {(1,9,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,9,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%)} * Non-linear torn systems (#iteration vars, #inner vars): 0 systems Notification: Performance of Backend phase and start with SimCode phase: time 0.00862/1.398, allocations: 8.185 MB / 1.458 GB, free: 17.1 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of simCode: created initialization part: time 0.01433/1.412, allocations: 13.4 MB / 1.471 GB, free: 3.523 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of simCode: created event and clocks part: time 4.699e-06/1.412, allocations: 0 / 1.471 GB, free: 3.523 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of simCode: created simulation system equations: time 0.003132/1.415, allocations: 3.044 MB / 1.474 GB, free: 404 kB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of simCode: created of all other equations (e.g. parameter, nominal, assert, etc): time 0.01027/1.425, allocations: 2.777 MB / 1.477 GB, free: 13.63 MB / 1.014 GB Notification: Performance of simCode: created linear, non-linear and system jacobian parts: time 0.3208/1.746, allocations: 101.7 MB / 1.576 GB, free: 84 kB / 1.107 GB Notification: Performance of simCode: some other stuff during SimCode phase: time 0.006035/1.752, allocations: 5.372 MB / 1.581 GB, free: 10.68 MB / 1.123 GB Notification: Performance of simCode: alias equations: time 0.01291/1.765, allocations: 6.395 MB / 1.587 GB, free: 4.293 MB / 1.123 GB Notification: Performance of simCode: all other stuff during SimCode phase: time 0.004407/1.77, allocations: 2.975 MB / 1.59 GB, free: 1.316 MB / 1.123 GB Notification: Performance of SimCode: time 5.71e-07/1.77, allocations: 0 / 1.59 GB, free: 1.316 MB / 1.123 GB Notification: Performance of buildModelFMU: Generate the FMI files: time 7.72/9.49, allocations: 202.4 MB / 1.788 GB, free: 400.8 MB / 1.248 GB Notification: Performance of buildModelFMU: configured platform static using cached values: time 0.0002113/9.49, allocations: 293.1 kB / 1.788 GB, free: 400.4 MB / 1.248 GB Notification: Performance of buildModelFMU: Generate platform static: time 6.299/15.79, allocations: 0 / 1.788 GB, free: 400.4 MB / 1.248 GB (rm -f Buildings_10_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.pipe ; mkfifo Buildings_10_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.pipe ; head -c 1048576 < Buildings_10_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.pipe >> ../files/Buildings_10_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.sim & /home/hudson/saved_omc/OMSimulator/install/bin/OMSimulator -r=Buildings_10_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU_res.mat --tempDir=temp_Buildings_10_Buildings_Fluid_HeatExchangers_RadiantSlabs_Examples_StepResponseEpsilonNTU_fmu --startTime=0 --stopTime=86400 --timeout=50 --tolerance=1e-06 Buildings_10_Buildings_Fluid_HeatExchangers_RadiantSlabs_Examples_StepResponseEpsilonNTU.fmu > Buildings_10_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.pipe 2>&1)