Running: ./testmodel.py --libraries=/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries --ompython_omhome=/usr Buildings_latest_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference.conf.json loadFile("/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/ModelicaServices 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo", uses=false) loadFile("/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Complex 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo", uses=false) loadFile("/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Modelica 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo", uses=false) loadFile("/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Buildings 11.0.0-master/package.mo", uses=false) Using package Buildings with version 11.0.0 (/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Buildings 11.0.0-master/package.mo) Using package Modelica with version 4.0.0 (/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Modelica 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo) Using package Complex with version 4.0.0 (/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Complex 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo) Using package ModelicaServices with version 4.0.0 (/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/ModelicaServices 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo) Running command: translateModel(Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference,tolerance=1e-06,outputFormat="mat",numberOfIntervals=5000,variableFilter="time|sla.sta_b.T|sla.surf_a.T|sla.surf_b.T|sla.surf_a.Q_flow|sla.surf_b.Q_flow",fileNamePrefix="Buildings_latest_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference") translateModel(Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference,tolerance=1e-06,outputFormat="mat",numberOfIntervals=5000,variableFilter="time|sla.sta_b.T|sla.surf_a.T|sla.surf_b.T|sla.surf_a.Q_flow|sla.surf_b.Q_flow",fileNamePrefix="Buildings_latest_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference") Notification: Performance of loadFile(/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/ModelicaServices 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo): time 0.001148/0.001148, allocations: 100.1 kB / 15.88 MB, free: 12 kB / 14.72 MB Notification: Performance of loadFile(/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Complex 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo): time 0.001183/0.001183, allocations: 199.7 kB / 16.79 MB, free: 6.809 MB / 14.72 MB Notification: Performance of loadFile(/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Modelica 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo): time 1.396/1.396, allocations: 222.9 MB / 240.5 MB, free: 4.617 MB / 190.1 MB Notification: Performance of loadFile(/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Buildings 11.0.0-master/package.mo): time 2.813/2.813, allocations: 461.8 MB / 0.7348 GB, free: 14.21 MB / 0.5919 GB Notification: Performance of FrontEnd - loaded program: time 0.001325/0.001325, allocations: 66.86 kB / 0.899 GB, free: 36.93 MB / 0.7169 GB Notification: Performance of FrontEnd - Absyn->SCode: time 0.3991/0.4004, allocations: 157.4 MB / 1.053 GB, free: 8.305 MB / 0.8106 GB Notification: Performance of NFInst.instantiate(Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference): time 0.0375/0.4379, allocations: 31.59 MB / 1.084 GB, free: 8.602 MB / 0.8419 GB Notification: Performance of NFInst.instExpressions: time 0.02071/0.4587, allocations: 12.44 MB / 1.096 GB, free: 12.14 MB / 0.8575 GB Notification: Performance of NFInst.updateImplicitVariability: time 0.003206/0.4619, allocations: 51.69 kB / 1.096 GB, free: 12.09 MB / 0.8575 GB Notification: Performance of NFTyping.typeComponents: time 0.004157/0.4661, allocations: 0.9721 MB / 1.097 GB, free: 11.11 MB / 0.8575 GB Notification: Performance of NFTyping.typeBindings: time 0.007391/0.4736, allocations: 1.921 MB / 1.099 GB, free: 9.18 MB / 0.8575 GB Notification: Performance of NFTyping.typeClassSections: time 0.006128/0.4797, allocations: 1.629 MB / 1.1 GB, free: 7.559 MB / 0.8575 GB Notification: Performance of NFFlatten.flatten: time 0.02692/0.5067, allocations: 22.45 MB / 1.122 GB, free: 1.059 MB / 0.8731 GB Notification: Performance of NFFlatten.resolveConnections: time 0.009175/0.5159, allocations: 5.574 MB / 1.128 GB, free: 11.41 MB / 0.8887 GB Notification: Performance of NFEvalConstants.evaluate: time 0.0114/0.5273, allocations: 5.096 MB / 1.133 GB, free: 6.293 MB / 0.8887 GB Notification: Performance of NFSimplifyModel.simplify: time 0.01064/0.538, allocations: 5.043 MB / 1.137 GB, free: 1.23 MB / 0.8887 GB Notification: Performance of NFPackage.collectConstants: time 0.002791/0.5408, allocations: 312 kB / 1.138 GB, free: 0.9258 MB / 0.8887 GB Notification: Performance of NFFlatten.collectFunctions: time 0.009386/0.5502, allocations: 2.703 MB / 1.14 GB, free: 14.22 MB / 0.9044 GB Notification: Performance of NFScalarize.scalarize: time 0.005095/0.5554, allocations: 2.363 MB / 1.143 GB, free: 11.85 MB / 0.9044 GB Notification: Performance of NFVerifyModel.verify: time 0.01095/0.5663, allocations: 4.038 MB / 1.147 GB, free: 7.789 MB / 0.9044 GB Notification: Performance of NFConvertDAE.convert: time 0.01722/0.5836, allocations: 12.73 MB / 1.159 GB, free: 11.04 MB / 0.92 GB Notification: Performance of FrontEnd - DAE generated: time 6.703e-06/0.5836, allocations: 0 / 1.159 GB, free: 11.04 MB / 0.92 GB Notification: Performance of FrontEnd: time 2.736e-06/0.5837, allocations: 0 / 1.159 GB, free: 11.04 MB / 0.92 GB Notification: Performance of Transformations before backend: time 0.0005673/0.5842, allocations: 0 / 1.159 GB, free: 11.04 MB / 0.92 GB Notification: Model statistics after passing the front-end and creating the data structures used by the back-end: * Number of equations: 866 * Number of variables: 866 Notification: Performance of Generate backend data structure: time 0.03805/0.6223, allocations: 11.49 MB / 1.17 GB, free: 15.43 MB / 0.9356 GB Notification: Performance of prepare preOptimizeDAE: time 5.005e-05/0.6224, allocations: 11.97 kB / 1.17 GB, free: 15.42 MB / 0.9356 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt normalInlineFunction (simulation): time 0.005103/0.6275, allocations: 0.8849 MB / 1.171 GB, free: 14.52 MB / 0.9356 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt evaluateParameters (simulation): time 0.02443/0.6519, allocations: 9.424 MB / 1.18 GB, free: 5.023 MB / 0.9356 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt simplifyIfEquations (simulation): time 0.0004286/0.6524, allocations: 334.8 kB / 1.181 GB, free: 4.695 MB / 0.9356 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt expandDerOperator (simulation): time 0.002403/0.6548, allocations: 483.8 kB / 1.181 GB, free: 4.223 MB / 0.9356 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt clockPartitioning (simulation): time 0.01511/0.67, allocations: 5.96 MB / 1.187 GB, free: 14.03 MB / 0.9512 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt findStateOrder (simulation): time 0.0001839/0.6702, allocations: 15.86 kB / 1.187 GB, free: 14.01 MB / 0.9512 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt replaceEdgeChange (simulation): time 0.001217/0.6714, allocations: 144 kB / 1.187 GB, free: 13.87 MB / 0.9512 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt inlineArrayEqn (simulation): time 0.000115/0.6715, allocations: 92 kB / 1.187 GB, free: 13.78 MB / 0.9512 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt removeEqualRHS (simulation): time 0.009292/0.6808, allocations: 4.766 MB / 1.192 GB, free: 9.004 MB / 0.9512 GB Warning: The model contains alias variables with redundant start and/or conflicting nominal values. It is recommended to resolve the conflicts, because otherwise the system could be hard to solve. To print the conflicting alias sets and the chosen candidates please use -d=aliasConflicts. Notification: Performance of preOpt removeSimpleEquations (simulation): time 0.06404/0.7449, allocations: 33.79 MB / 1.225 GB, free: 5.562 MB / 0.9825 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt comSubExp (simulation): time 0.01322/0.7582, allocations: 6.228 MB / 1.231 GB, free: 15.23 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt resolveLoops (simulation): time 0.005196/0.7635, allocations: 2.51 MB / 1.233 GB, free: 12.71 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt evalFunc (simulation): time 0.7897/1.553, allocations: 13.19 MB / 1.246 GB, free: 169.7 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt encapsulateWhenConditions (simulation): time 0.003746/1.557, allocations: 2.139 MB / 1.248 GB, free: 169.6 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of pre-optimization done (n=224): time 4.529e-06/1.557, allocations: 0 / 1.248 GB, free: 169.6 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of matching and sorting (n=232): time 0.03476/1.592, allocations: 14.01 MB / 1.262 GB, free: 166.7 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of inlineWhenForInitialization (initialization): time 7.766e-05/1.592, allocations: 128.8 kB / 1.262 GB, free: 166.5 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of selectInitializationVariablesDAE (initialization): time 0.02897/1.621, allocations: 10.36 MB / 1.272 GB, free: 166 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of collectPreVariables (initialization): time 0.00126/1.622, allocations: 115.5 kB / 1.272 GB, free: 166 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of collectInitialEqns (initialization): time 0.005456/1.628, allocations: 3.311 MB / 1.276 GB, free: 164 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of collectInitialBindings (initialization): time 0.00238/1.63, allocations: 0.8661 MB / 1.276 GB, free: 163.3 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of simplifyInitialFunctions (initialization): time 0.002753/1.633, allocations: 1.209 MB / 1.278 GB, free: 162.8 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of setup shared object (initialization): time 7.719e-05/1.633, allocations: 306.1 kB / 1.278 GB, free: 162.5 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of preBalanceInitialSystem (initialization): time 0.005871/1.639, allocations: 3.452 MB / 1.281 GB, free: 161.6 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of partitionIndependentBlocks (initialization): time 0.007769/1.647, allocations: 5.928 MB / 1.287 GB, free: 157.5 MB / 0.9981 GB Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3])) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3])) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3])) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3])) Notification: Performance of analyzeInitialSystem (initialization): time 0.05793/1.705, allocations: 36.64 MB / 1.323 GB, free: 129.2 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of solveInitialSystemEqSystem (initialization): time 0.0001372/1.705, allocations: 24 kB / 1.323 GB, free: 129.2 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of matching and sorting (n=659) (initialization): time 0.02061/1.725, allocations: 10.08 MB / 1.333 GB, free: 119.1 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of prepare postOptimizeDAE: time 0.0001759/1.726, allocations: 77.69 kB / 1.333 GB, free: 119 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyComplexFunction (initialization): time 0.0001811/1.726, allocations: 85.41 kB / 1.333 GB, free: 118.9 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt tearingSystem (initialization): time 0.001794/1.728, allocations: 0.7062 MB / 1.334 GB, free: 118.2 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt solveSimpleEquations (initialization): time 0.005475/1.733, allocations: 1.474 MB / 1.335 GB, free: 116.7 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt calculateStrongComponentJacobians (initialization): time 0.009389/1.743, allocations: 13.42 MB / 1.348 GB, free: 102.4 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyAllExpressions (initialization): time 0.01134/1.754, allocations: 1.306 MB / 1.349 GB, free: 101.1 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt collapseArrayExpressions (initialization): time 0.0017/1.756, allocations: 276 kB / 1.35 GB, free: 100.8 MB / 0.9981 GB Warning: The initial conditions are over specified. The following 8 initial equations are redundant, so they are removed from the initialization system: sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3]) sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3]) sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3]) sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]). Notification: Performance of preBalanceInitialSystem (initialization_lambda0): time 0.01286/1.769, allocations: 7.078 MB / 1.357 GB, free: 93.7 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of partitionIndependentBlocks (initialization_lambda0): time 0.007392/1.776, allocations: 5.943 MB / 1.362 GB, free: 86.56 MB / 0.9981 GB Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3])) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3])) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3])) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3])) Notification: Performance of analyzeInitialSystem (initialization_lambda0): time 0.05607/1.832, allocations: 36.55 MB / 1.398 GB, free: 48.56 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of solveInitialSystemEqSystem (initialization_lambda0): time 8.85e-05/1.832, allocations: 28 kB / 1.398 GB, free: 48.54 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of matching and sorting (n=659) (initialization_lambda0): time 0.01991/1.852, allocations: 10.08 MB / 1.408 GB, free: 38.37 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of prepare postOptimizeDAE: time 0.0001271/1.852, allocations: 73.64 kB / 1.408 GB, free: 38.29 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyComplexFunction (initialization): time 0.0001354/1.853, allocations: 85.78 kB / 1.408 GB, free: 38.21 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt tearingSystem (initialization): time 0.001721/1.854, allocations: 0.7093 MB / 1.409 GB, free: 37.48 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt solveSimpleEquations (initialization): time 0.005278/1.86, allocations: 1.478 MB / 1.41 GB, free: 36 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt calculateStrongComponentJacobians (initialization): time 0.009056/1.869, allocations: 13.4 MB / 1.423 GB, free: 21.68 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyAllExpressions (initialization): time 0.01124/1.88, allocations: 1.302 MB / 1.425 GB, free: 20.38 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt collapseArrayExpressions (initialization): time 0.001594/1.882, allocations: 276 kB / 1.425 GB, free: 20.11 MB / 0.9981 GB Warning: The initial conditions are over specified. The following 8 initial equations are redundant, so they are removed from the initialization_lambda0 system: sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3]) sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3]) sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3]) sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]). Notification: Model statistics after passing the back-end for initialization: * Number of independent subsystems: 384 * Number of states: 0 () * Number of discrete variables: 5 ($PRE.pulse.count,$PRE.pulse.T_start,pulse.count,pulse.T_start,$whenCondition1) * Number of discrete states: 0 () * Number of clocked states: 0 () * Top-level inputs: 0 Notification: Strong component statistics for initialization (635): * Single equations (assignments): 627 * Array equations: 0 * Algorithm blocks: 1 * Record equations: 0 * When equations: 0 * If-equations: 0 * Equation systems (not torn): 0 * Torn equation systems: 7 * Mixed (continuous/discrete) equation systems: 0 Notification: Torn system details for strict tearing set: * Linear torn systems (#iteration vars, #inner vars, density): 7 systems {(1,9,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,9,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%)} * Non-linear torn systems (#iteration vars, #inner vars): 0 systems Notification: Performance of prepare postOptimizeDAE: time 0.003803/1.885, allocations: 0.7615 MB / 1.426 GB, free: 19.35 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt lateInlineFunction (simulation): time 0.004337/1.89, allocations: 0.6634 MB / 1.426 GB, free: 18.68 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt wrapFunctionCalls (simulation): time 0.01101/1.901, allocations: 5.152 MB / 1.431 GB, free: 13.49 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt inlineArrayEqn (simulation): time 2.77e-05/1.901, allocations: 24 kB / 1.431 GB, free: 13.46 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt constantLinearSystem (simulation): time 2.52e-05/1.901, allocations: 11.94 kB / 1.431 GB, free: 13.45 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifysemiLinear (simulation): time 0.005538/1.906, allocations: 3.96 MB / 1.435 GB, free: 9.461 MB / 0.9981 GB Warning: The model contains alias variables with redundant start and/or conflicting nominal values. It is recommended to resolve the conflicts, because otherwise the system could be hard to solve. To print the conflicting alias sets and the chosen candidates please use -d=aliasConflicts. Notification: Performance of postOpt removeSimpleEquations (simulation): time 0.03257/1.939, allocations: 13.38 MB / 1.448 GB, free: 11.91 MB / 1.014 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyComplexFunction (simulation): time 1.518e-05/1.939, allocations: 4 kB / 1.448 GB, free: 11.91 MB / 1.014 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt solveSimpleEquations (simulation): time 0.002752/1.942, allocations: 0.6049 MB / 1.449 GB, free: 11.3 MB / 1.014 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt tearingSystem (simulation): time 0.001663/1.943, allocations: 0.5794 MB / 1.449 GB, free: 10.7 MB / 1.014 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt inputDerivativesUsed (simulation): time 0.0005189/1.944, allocations: 135.9 kB / 1.45 GB, free: 10.57 MB / 1.014 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt calculateStrongComponentJacobians (simulation): time 0.01197/1.956, allocations: 13.29 MB / 1.463 GB, free: 12.36 MB / 1.029 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt calculateStateSetsJacobians (simulation): time 7.394e-06/1.956, allocations: 4.031 kB / 1.463 GB, free: 12.36 MB / 1.029 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt symbolicJacobian (simulation): time 0.01434/1.97, allocations: 7.118 MB / 1.47 GB, free: 5.152 MB / 1.029 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt removeConstants (simulation): time 0.006364/1.977, allocations: 1.648 MB / 1.471 GB, free: 3.477 MB / 1.029 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyTimeIndepFuncCalls (simulation): time 0.003333/1.98, allocations: 135.8 kB / 1.471 GB, free: 3.344 MB / 1.029 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyAllExpressions (simulation): time 0.006993/1.987, allocations: 0.6977 MB / 1.472 GB, free: 2.645 MB / 1.029 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt findZeroCrossings (simulation): time 0.0007036/1.988, allocations: 161.7 kB / 1.472 GB, free: 2.484 MB / 1.029 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt collapseArrayExpressions (simulation): time 0.0004334/1.988, allocations: 83.95 kB / 1.472 GB, free: 2.402 MB / 1.029 GB Notification: Performance of sorting global known variables: time 0.01877/2.007, allocations: 7.283 MB / 1.479 GB, free: 11.13 MB / 1.045 GB Notification: Performance of sort global known variables: time 9.12e-07/2.007, allocations: 0 / 1.479 GB, free: 11.13 MB / 1.045 GB Notification: Performance of remove unused functions: time 0.02652/2.034, allocations: 3.947 MB / 1.483 GB, free: 7.207 MB / 1.045 GB Notification: Model statistics after passing the back-end for simulation: * Number of independent subsystems: 12 * Number of states: 43 (sla.vol[1].dynBal.U,sla.vol[2].dynBal.U,sla.vol[3].dynBal.U,sla.vol[4].dynBal.U,sla.vol[5].dynBal.U,sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_b[1].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[2].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[3].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[4].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[5].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T[3],TOut.T) * Number of discrete variables: 3 ($whenCondition1,pulse.T_start,pulse.count) * Number of discrete states: 1 (pulse.count) * Number of clocked states: 0 () * Top-level inputs: 0 Notification: Strong component statistics for simulation (210): * Single equations (assignments): 199 * Array equations: 0 * Algorithm blocks: 0 * Record equations: 2 * When equations: 2 * If-equations: 0 * Equation systems (not torn): 0 * Torn equation systems: 7 * Mixed (continuous/discrete) equation systems: 0 Notification: Torn system details for strict tearing set: * Linear torn systems (#iteration vars, #inner vars, density): 7 systems {(1,9,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,9,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%)} * Non-linear torn systems (#iteration vars, #inner vars): 0 systems Notification: Performance of Backend phase and start with SimCode phase: time 0.003648/2.037, allocations: 0.601 MB / 1.484 GB, free: 6.672 MB / 1.045 GB Notification: Performance of simCode: created initialization part: time 0.02679/2.064, allocations: 13.39 MB / 1.497 GB, free: 9.109 MB / 1.061 GB Notification: Performance of simCode: created event and clocks part: time 1.263e-05/2.064, allocations: 3.828 kB / 1.497 GB, free: 9.109 MB / 1.061 GB Notification: Performance of simCode: created simulation system equations: time 0.005689/2.07, allocations: 3.032 MB / 1.5 GB, free: 5.988 MB / 1.061 GB Notification: Performance of simCode: created of all other equations (e.g. parameter, nominal, assert, etc): time 0.02091/2.091, allocations: 2.783 MB / 1.502 GB, free: 3.23 MB / 1.061 GB Notification: Performance of simCode: created linear, non-linear and system jacobian parts: time 0.04601/2.137, allocations: 21.37 MB / 1.523 GB, free: 13.82 MB / 1.092 GB Notification: Performance of simCode: some other stuff during SimCode phase: time 0.01046/2.148, allocations: 5.372 MB / 1.529 GB, free: 8.41 MB / 1.092 GB Notification: Performance of simCode: all other stuff during SimCode phase: time 0.003514/2.151, allocations: 447.4 kB / 1.529 GB, free: 7.977 MB / 1.092 GB Notification: Performance of SimCode: time 1.473e-06/2.151, allocations: 0 / 1.529 GB, free: 7.977 MB / 1.092 GB Notification: Performance of Templates: time 1.235/3.386, allocations: 477.2 MB / 1.995 GB, free: 193.2 MB / 1.279 GB make -j1 -f Buildings_latest_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference.makefile (rm -f Buildings_latest_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference.pipe ; mkfifo Buildings_latest_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference.pipe ; head -c 1048576 < Buildings_latest_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference.pipe >> ../files/Buildings_latest_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference.sim & ./Buildings_latest_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference -abortSlowSimulation -alarm=480 -emit_protected -lv LOG_STATS > Buildings_latest_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference.pipe 2>&1) diffSimulationResults("Buildings_latest_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference_res.mat","/mnt/ReferenceFiles/Buildings/csv/master/Buildings_Fluid_HeatExchangers_RadiantSlabs_Examples_StepResponseFiniteDifference.csv","/var/lib/jenkins1/ws/OpenModelicaLibraryTestingWork/OpenModelicaLibraryTesting/files/Buildings_latest_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference.diff",relTol=0.003,relTolDiffMinMax=0.003,rangeDelta=0.001) Reference file matches