Running: ./testmodel.py --libraries=/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries --ompython_omhome=/usr Buildings_9_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.conf.json
loadFile("/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/ModelicaServices 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo", uses=false)
loadFile("/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Complex 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo", uses=false)
loadFile("/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Modelica 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo", uses=false)
loadFile("/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Buildings 9.1.2-maint.9.1.x/package.mo", uses=false)
Using package Buildings with version 9.1.2 (/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Buildings 9.1.2-maint.9.1.x/package.mo)
Using package Modelica with version 4.0.0 (/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Modelica 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo)
Using package Complex with version 4.0.0 (/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Complex 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo)
Using package ModelicaServices with version 4.0.0 (/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/ModelicaServices 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo)
Running command: translateModel(Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU,tolerance=1e-06,outputFormat="mat",numberOfIntervals=5000,variableFilter="time|sla.sta_b.T|sla.surf_a.T|sla.surf_b.T|sla.surf_a.Q_flow|sla.surf_b.Q_flow",fileNamePrefix="Buildings_9_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU")
translateModel(Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU,tolerance=1e-06,outputFormat="mat",numberOfIntervals=5000,variableFilter="time|sla.sta_b.T|sla.surf_a.T|sla.surf_b.T|sla.surf_a.Q_flow|sla.surf_b.Q_flow",fileNamePrefix="Buildings_9_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU")
Notification: Performance of loadFile(/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/ModelicaServices 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo): time 0.001386/0.001386, allocations: 100.1 kB / 15.88 MB, free: 12 kB / 14.72 MB
Notification: Performance of loadFile(/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Complex 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo): time 0.001885/0.001885, allocations: 199.5 kB / 16.79 MB, free: 6.809 MB / 14.72 MB
Notification: Performance of loadFile(/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Modelica 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo): time 1.549/1.549, allocations: 222.9 MB / 240.5 MB, free: 4.523 MB / 190.1 MB
Notification: Performance of loadFile(/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Buildings 9.1.2-maint.9.1.x/package.mo): time 2.447/2.447, allocations: 390.2 MB / 0.6649 GB, free: 0.6172 MB / 0.5137 GB
Notification: Performance of FrontEnd - loaded program: time 0.00155/0.00155, allocations: 59.91 kB / 0.8125 GB, free: 14.89 MB / 0.67 GB
Notification: Performance of FrontEnd - Absyn->SCode: time 0.7338/0.7354, allocations: 140.4 MB / 0.9496 GB, free: 9.188 MB / 0.7169 GB
Notification: Performance of NFInst.instantiate(Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU): time 0.03482/0.7703, allocations: 31.58 MB / 0.9804 GB, free: 15.95 MB / 0.7481 GB
Notification: Performance of NFInst.instExpressions: time 0.02273/0.7931, allocations: 12.43 MB / 0.9926 GB, free: 5.977 MB / 0.7481 GB
Notification: Performance of NFInst.updateImplicitVariability: time 0.003758/0.7969, allocations: 53.84 kB / 0.9926 GB, free: 5.957 MB / 0.7481 GB
Notification: Performance of NFTyping.typeComponents: time 0.004046/0.801, allocations: 0.9678 MB / 0.9935 GB, free: 4.988 MB / 0.7481 GB
Notification: Performance of NFTyping.typeBindings: time 0.007594/0.8087, allocations: 1.925 MB / 0.9954 GB, free: 3.055 MB / 0.7481 GB
Notification: Performance of NFTyping.typeClassSections: time 0.00621/0.8149, allocations: 1.625 MB / 0.997 GB, free: 1.438 MB / 0.7481 GB
Notification: Performance of NFFlatten.flatten: time 0.02282/0.8377, allocations: 22.47 MB / 1.019 GB, free: 10.92 MB / 0.7794 GB
Notification: Performance of NFFlatten.resolveConnections: time 0.008743/0.8465, allocations: 5.57 MB / 1.024 GB, free: 5.273 MB / 0.7794 GB
Notification: Performance of NFEvalConstants.evaluate: time 0.01068/0.8572, allocations: 5.092 MB / 1.029 GB, free: 168 kB / 0.7794 GB
Notification: Performance of NFSimplifyModel.simplify: time 0.009944/0.8672, allocations: 5.051 MB / 1.034 GB, free: 11.09 MB / 0.795 GB
Notification: Performance of NFPackage.collectConstants: time 0.002286/0.8696, allocations: 312 kB / 1.035 GB, free: 10.79 MB / 0.795 GB
Notification: Performance of NFFlatten.collectFunctions: time 0.008208/0.8778, allocations: 2.7 MB / 1.037 GB, free: 8.082 MB / 0.795 GB
Notification: Performance of NFScalarize.scalarize: time 0.004032/0.8819, allocations: 2.363 MB / 1.04 GB, free: 5.711 MB / 0.795 GB
Notification: Performance of NFVerifyModel.verify: time 0.008874/0.8907, allocations: 4.03 MB / 1.043 GB, free: 1.66 MB / 0.795 GB
Notification: Performance of NFConvertDAE.convert: time 0.01557/0.9063, allocations: 12.73 MB / 1.056 GB, free: 4.906 MB / 0.8106 GB
Notification: Performance of FrontEnd - DAE generated: time 7.935e-06/0.9064, allocations: 4 kB / 1.056 GB, free: 4.902 MB / 0.8106 GB
Notification: Performance of FrontEnd: time 2.014e-06/0.9064, allocations: 0 / 1.056 GB, free: 4.902 MB / 0.8106 GB
Notification: Performance of Transformations before backend: time 0.0005076/0.9069, allocations: 0 / 1.056 GB, free: 4.902 MB / 0.8106 GB
Notification: Model statistics after passing the front-end and creating the data structures used by the back-end:
 * Number of equations: 866
 * Number of variables: 866
Notification: Performance of Generate backend data structure: time 0.03489/0.9418, allocations: 11.48 MB / 1.067 GB, free: 9.309 MB / 0.8262 GB
Notification: Performance of prepare preOptimizeDAE: time 5.084e-05/0.9419, allocations: 8.031 kB / 1.067 GB, free: 9.301 MB / 0.8262 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt normalInlineFunction (simulation): time 0.004913/0.9468, allocations: 0.8805 MB / 1.068 GB, free: 8.41 MB / 0.8262 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt evaluateParameters (simulation): time 0.02338/0.9702, allocations: 9.422 MB / 1.077 GB, free: 14.91 MB / 0.8419 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt simplifyIfEquations (simulation): time 0.0004454/0.9707, allocations: 338.8 kB / 1.078 GB, free: 14.57 MB / 0.8419 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt expandDerOperator (simulation): time 0.002372/0.9731, allocations: 479.8 kB / 1.078 GB, free: 14.11 MB / 0.8419 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt clockPartitioning (simulation): time 0.01478/0.9879, allocations: 5.968 MB / 1.084 GB, free: 7.906 MB / 0.8419 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt findStateOrder (simulation): time 0.0001533/0.9881, allocations: 11.88 kB / 1.084 GB, free: 7.895 MB / 0.8419 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt replaceEdgeChange (simulation): time 0.001098/0.9892, allocations: 147.9 kB / 1.084 GB, free: 7.75 MB / 0.8419 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt inlineArrayEqn (simulation): time 0.0001265/0.9894, allocations: 99.92 kB / 1.084 GB, free: 7.652 MB / 0.8419 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt removeEqualRHS (simulation): time 0.009681/0.9991, allocations: 4.762 MB / 1.089 GB, free: 2.879 MB / 0.8419 GB
Warning: The model contains alias variables with redundant start and/or conflicting nominal values. It is recommended to resolve the conflicts, because otherwise the system could be hard to solve. To print the conflicting alias sets and the chosen candidates please use -d=aliasConflicts.
Notification: Performance of preOpt removeSimpleEquations (simulation): time 0.06339/1.062, allocations: 33.78 MB / 1.122 GB, free: 15.45 MB / 0.8887 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt comSubExp (simulation): time 0.0127/1.075, allocations: 6.22 MB / 1.128 GB, free: 9.125 MB / 0.8887 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt resolveLoops (simulation): time 0.004638/1.08, allocations: 2.513 MB / 1.13 GB, free: 6.605 MB / 0.8887 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt evalFunc (simulation): time 0.03168/1.112, allocations: 13.2 MB / 1.143 GB, free: 8.863 MB / 0.9044 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt encapsulateWhenConditions (simulation): time 0.004464/1.116, allocations: 2.137 MB / 1.145 GB, free: 6.703 MB / 0.9044 GB
Notification: Performance of pre-optimization done (n=224): time 5.69e-06/1.116, allocations: 0 / 1.145 GB, free: 6.703 MB / 0.9044 GB
Notification: Performance of matching and sorting (n=232): time 0.03696/1.153, allocations: 14.01 MB / 1.159 GB, free: 8.504 MB / 0.92 GB
Notification: Performance of inlineWhenForInitialization (initialization): time 0.0001048/1.153, allocations: 144.6 kB / 1.159 GB, free: 8.34 MB / 0.92 GB
Notification: Performance of selectInitializationVariablesDAE (initialization): time 0.02515/1.178, allocations: 10.36 MB / 1.169 GB, free: 13.99 MB / 0.9356 GB
Notification: Performance of collectPreVariables (initialization): time 0.001136/1.18, allocations: 113.7 kB / 1.169 GB, free: 13.87 MB / 0.9356 GB
Notification: Performance of collectInitialEqns (initialization): time 0.005379/1.185, allocations: 3.301 MB / 1.172 GB, free: 10.55 MB / 0.9356 GB
Notification: Performance of collectInitialBindings (initialization): time 0.002191/1.187, allocations: 0.8707 MB / 1.173 GB, free: 9.664 MB / 0.9356 GB
Notification: Performance of simplifyInitialFunctions (initialization): time 0.002721/1.19, allocations: 1.202 MB / 1.174 GB, free: 8.453 MB / 0.9356 GB
Notification: Performance of setup shared object (initialization): time 0.0001345/1.19, allocations: 305.1 kB / 1.175 GB, free: 8.152 MB / 0.9356 GB
Notification: Performance of preBalanceInitialSystem (initialization): time 0.005811/1.196, allocations: 3.451 MB / 1.178 GB, free: 4.684 MB / 0.9356 GB
Notification: Performance of partitionIndependentBlocks (initialization): time 0.008551/1.205, allocations: 5.928 MB / 1.184 GB, free: 13.55 MB / 0.9512 GB
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3]))
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3]))
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3]))
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]))
Notification: Performance of analyzeInitialSystem (initialization): time 0.06747/1.272, allocations: 36.64 MB / 1.22 GB, free: 7.461 MB / 0.9825 GB
Notification: Performance of solveInitialSystemEqSystem (initialization): time 8.768e-05/1.272, allocations: 28 kB / 1.22 GB, free: 7.434 MB / 0.9825 GB
Notification: Performance of matching and sorting (n=659) (initialization): time 0.02313/1.295, allocations: 10.07 MB / 1.23 GB, free: 13.28 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of prepare postOptimizeDAE: time 0.0001802/1.296, allocations: 73.69 kB / 1.23 GB, free: 13.2 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyComplexFunction (initialization): time 0.0001816/1.296, allocations: 88 kB / 1.23 GB, free: 13.12 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt tearingSystem (initialization): time 0.001973/1.298, allocations: 0.7129 MB / 1.23 GB, free: 12.38 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt solveSimpleEquations (initialization): time 0.005798/1.304, allocations: 1.478 MB / 1.232 GB, free: 10.9 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt calculateStrongComponentJacobians (initialization): time 0.01312/1.317, allocations: 13.42 MB / 1.245 GB, free: 12.55 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyAllExpressions (initialization): time 0.0104/1.327, allocations: 1.31 MB / 1.246 GB, free: 11.24 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt collapseArrayExpressions (initialization): time 0.001571/1.329, allocations: 280 kB / 1.247 GB, free: 10.97 MB / 1.014 GB
Warning: The initial conditions are over specified. The following 8 initial equations are redundant, so they are removed from the initialization system:
         sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start
         sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start
         sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start
         sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start
         sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3])
         sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3])
         sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3])
         sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]).
Notification: Performance of preBalanceInitialSystem (initialization_lambda0): time 0.01486/1.344, allocations: 7.08 MB / 1.253 GB, free: 3.875 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of partitionIndependentBlocks (initialization_lambda0): time 0.605/1.949, allocations: 5.928 MB / 1.259 GB, free: 268.9 MB / 1.014 GB
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3]))
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3]))
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3]))
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]))
Notification: Performance of analyzeInitialSystem (initialization_lambda0): time 0.06739/2.016, allocations: 36.57 MB / 1.295 GB, free: 255.6 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of solveInitialSystemEqSystem (initialization_lambda0): time 0.0002168/2.016, allocations: 23.38 kB / 1.295 GB, free: 255.6 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of matching and sorting (n=659) (initialization_lambda0): time 0.0227/2.039, allocations: 10.07 MB / 1.305 GB, free: 250.8 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of prepare postOptimizeDAE: time 0.0002026/2.039, allocations: 67.86 kB / 1.305 GB, free: 250.8 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyComplexFunction (initialization): time 0.0001831/2.04, allocations: 85.28 kB / 1.305 GB, free: 250.8 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt tearingSystem (initialization): time 0.001764/2.041, allocations: 0.7102 MB / 1.306 GB, free: 250.5 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt solveSimpleEquations (initialization): time 0.005335/2.047, allocations: 1.481 MB / 1.307 GB, free: 250 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt calculateStrongComponentJacobians (initialization): time 0.009093/2.056, allocations: 13.41 MB / 1.32 GB, free: 236.7 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyAllExpressions (initialization): time 0.01055/2.066, allocations: 1.304 MB / 1.321 GB, free: 235.4 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt collapseArrayExpressions (initialization): time 0.0017/2.068, allocations: 283.7 kB / 1.322 GB, free: 235.1 MB / 1.014 GB
Warning: The initial conditions are over specified. The following 8 initial equations are redundant, so they are removed from the initialization_lambda0 system:
         sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start
         sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start
         sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start
         sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start
         sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3])
         sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3])
         sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3])
         sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]).
Notification: Model statistics after passing the back-end for initialization:
 * Number of independent subsystems: 384
 * Number of states: 0 ()
 * Number of discrete variables: 5 ($PRE.pulse.count,$PRE.pulse.T_start,pulse.count,pulse.T_start,$whenCondition1)
 * Number of discrete states: 0 ()
 * Number of clocked states: 0 ()
 * Top-level inputs: 0
Notification: Strong component statistics for initialization (635):
 * Single equations (assignments): 627
 * Array equations: 0
 * Algorithm blocks: 1
 * Record equations: 0
 * When equations: 0
 * If-equations: 0
 * Equation systems (not torn): 0
 * Torn equation systems: 7
 * Mixed (continuous/discrete) equation systems: 0
Notification: Torn system details for strict tearing set:
 * Linear torn systems (#iteration vars, #inner vars, density): 7 systems
   {(1,9,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,9,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%)}
 * Non-linear torn systems (#iteration vars, #inner vars): 0 systems
Notification: Performance of prepare postOptimizeDAE: time 0.002567/2.071, allocations: 0.765 MB / 1.322 GB, free: 234.4 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt lateInlineFunction (simulation): time 0.003015/2.074, allocations: 0.6608 MB / 1.323 GB, free: 234.1 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt wrapFunctionCalls (simulation): time 0.009813/2.084, allocations: 5.148 MB / 1.328 GB, free: 229 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt inlineArrayEqn (simulation): time 2.651e-05/2.084, allocations: 24 kB / 1.328 GB, free: 228.9 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt constantLinearSystem (simulation): time 2.164e-05/2.084, allocations: 4 kB / 1.328 GB, free: 228.9 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifysemiLinear (simulation): time 0.005115/2.089, allocations: 3.958 MB / 1.332 GB, free: 224.9 MB / 1.014 GB
Warning: The model contains alias variables with redundant start and/or conflicting nominal values. It is recommended to resolve the conflicts, because otherwise the system could be hard to solve. To print the conflicting alias sets and the chosen candidates please use -d=aliasConflicts.
Notification: Performance of postOpt removeSimpleEquations (simulation): time 0.02647/2.115, allocations: 13.39 MB / 1.345 GB, free: 211.4 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyComplexFunction (simulation): time 1.293e-05/2.115, allocations: 8.031 kB / 1.345 GB, free: 211.4 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt solveSimpleEquations (simulation): time 0.002314/2.118, allocations: 0.6006 MB / 1.346 GB, free: 210.8 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt tearingSystem (simulation): time 0.001406/2.119, allocations: 0.5756 MB / 1.346 GB, free: 210.2 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt inputDerivativesUsed (simulation): time 0.0003364/2.12, allocations: 138.4 kB / 1.346 GB, free: 210.1 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt calculateStrongComponentJacobians (simulation): time 0.008011/2.128, allocations: 13.28 MB / 1.359 GB, free: 195.9 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt calculateStateSetsJacobians (simulation): time 3.126e-06/2.128, allocations: 7.828 kB / 1.359 GB, free: 195.9 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt symbolicJacobian (simulation): time 0.01095/2.139, allocations: 7.123 MB / 1.366 GB, free: 189.1 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt removeConstants (simulation): time 0.005187/2.144, allocations: 1.652 MB / 1.368 GB, free: 187.4 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyTimeIndepFuncCalls (simulation): time 0.002859/2.147, allocations: 127.8 kB / 1.368 GB, free: 187.3 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyAllExpressions (simulation): time 0.006355/2.153, allocations: 0.6996 MB / 1.369 GB, free: 186.6 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt findZeroCrossings (simulation): time 0.0007003/2.154, allocations: 157.7 kB / 1.369 GB, free: 186.4 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt collapseArrayExpressions (simulation): time 0.0004657/2.154, allocations: 87.95 kB / 1.369 GB, free: 186.3 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of sorting global known variables: time 0.01537/2.17, allocations: 7.284 MB / 1.376 GB, free: 179.1 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of sort global known variables: time 4.21e-07/2.17, allocations: 4 kB / 1.376 GB, free: 179.1 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of remove unused functions: time 0.01812/2.188, allocations: 3.953 MB / 1.38 GB, free: 175.1 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Model statistics after passing the back-end for simulation:
 * Number of independent subsystems: 12
 * Number of states: 43 (sla.vol[1].dynBal.U,sla.vol[2].dynBal.U,sla.vol[3].dynBal.U,sla.vol[4].dynBal.U,sla.vol[5].dynBal.U,sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_b[1].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[2].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[3].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[4].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[5].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T[3],TOut.T)
 * Number of discrete variables: 3 ($whenCondition1,pulse.T_start,pulse.count)
 * Number of discrete states: 1 (pulse.count)
 * Number of clocked states: 0 ()
 * Top-level inputs: 0
Notification: Strong component statistics for simulation (210):
 * Single equations (assignments): 199
 * Array equations: 0
 * Algorithm blocks: 0
 * Record equations: 2
 * When equations: 2
 * If-equations: 0
 * Equation systems (not torn): 0
 * Torn equation systems: 7
 * Mixed (continuous/discrete) equation systems: 0
Notification: Torn system details for strict tearing set:
 * Linear torn systems (#iteration vars, #inner vars, density): 7 systems
   {(1,9,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,9,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%)}
 * Non-linear torn systems (#iteration vars, #inner vars): 0 systems
Notification: Performance of Backend phase and start with SimCode phase: time 0.002466/2.19, allocations: 0.5951 MB / 1.381 GB, free: 174.6 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of simCode: created initialization part: time 0.01957/2.21, allocations: 13.39 MB / 1.394 GB, free: 161.1 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of simCode: created event and clocks part: time 9.558e-06/2.21, allocations: 0 / 1.394 GB, free: 161.1 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of simCode: created simulation system equations: time 0.00417/2.214, allocations: 3.033 MB / 1.397 GB, free: 158 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of simCode: created of all other equations (e.g. parameter, nominal, assert, etc): time 0.01742/2.232, allocations: 2.782 MB / 1.399 GB, free: 155.2 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of simCode: created linear, non-linear and system jacobian parts: time 0.03714/2.269, allocations: 21.38 MB / 1.42 GB, free: 133.8 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of simCode: some other stuff during SimCode phase: time 0.007367/2.276, allocations: 5.369 MB / 1.425 GB, free: 128.4 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of simCode: all other stuff during SimCode phase: time 0.002942/2.279, allocations: 451.3 kB / 1.426 GB, free: 128 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of SimCode: time 1.332e-06/2.279, allocations: 7.938 kB / 1.426 GB, free: 128 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of Templates: time 1.124/3.403, allocations: 477.2 MB / 1.892 GB, free: 223.8 MB / 1.154 GB
make -j1 -f Buildings_9_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.makefile
(rm -f Buildings_9_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.pipe ; mkfifo Buildings_9_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.pipe ; head -c 1048576 < Buildings_9_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.pipe >> ../files/Buildings_9_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.sim & ./Buildings_9_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU  -abortSlowSimulation -alarm=480  -emit_protected -lv LOG_STATS > Buildings_9_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.pipe 2>&1)
diffSimulationResults("Buildings_9_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU_res.mat","/mnt/ReferenceFiles/Buildings/csv/maint_9.1.x/Buildings_Fluid_HeatExchangers_RadiantSlabs_Examples_StepResponseEpsilonNTU.csv","/var/lib/jenkins1/ws/OpenModelicaLibraryTestingWork/OpenModelicaLibraryTesting/files/Buildings_9_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.diff",relTol=0.003,relTolDiffMinMax=0.003,rangeDelta=0.001)
Reference file matches