Environment - simulationEnvironment: startTime=0 stopTime=172800 tolerance=1e-06 numberOfIntervals=2500 stepSize=69.12 Regular simulation: ./Buildings_1.6_Buildings.Examples.VAVCO2.VAVSystemCTControl -abortSlowSimulation -alarm=480 -lv LOG_STATS assert | warning | The following assertion has been violated at time 0.000000 | | | | roo.roo49.vav.m_flow_nominal_pos >= (-min(100000.0, min(100000.0, min(9.999999999999999e+59, min(9.999999999999999e+59, min(-(if roo.spl38.portFlowDirection_3 == Modelica.Fluid.Types.PortFlowDirection.Entering then 0.0 else -9.999999999999999e+59), 100000.0)))))) and roo.roo49.vav.m_flow_nominal_pos <= (-max(-100000.0, max(-100000.0, max(-100000.0, max(-100000.0, max(-(if roo.spl38.portFlowDirection_3 == Modelica.Fluid.Types.PortFlowDirection.Leaving then 0.0 else 9.999999999999999e+59), 0.0)))))) assert | warning | Nominal variable violating min/max constraint: -min(100000.0, min(100000.0, min(9.999999999999999e+59, min(9.999999999999999e+59, min(-(if roo.spl38.portFlowDirection_3 == Modelica.Fluid.Types.PortFlowDirection.Entering then 0.0 else -9.999999999999999e+59), 100000.0))))) <= $cse29 <= -max(-100000.0, max(-100000.0, max(-100000.0, max(-100000.0, max(-(if roo.spl38.portFlowDirection_3 == Modelica.Fluid.Types.PortFlowDirection.Leaving then 0.0 else 9.999999999999999e+59), 0.0))))), has value: 0.3624 assert | warning | The following assertion has been violated at time 0.000000 | | | | roo.roo50.vav.m_flow_nominal_pos >= (-min(100000.0, min(100000.0, min(9.999999999999999e+59, min(9.999999999999999e+59, min(-(if roo.spl38.portFlowDirection_2 == Modelica.Fluid.Types.PortFlowDirection.Entering then 0.0 else -9.999999999999999e+59), 100000.0)))))) and roo.roo50.vav.m_flow_nominal_pos <= (-max(-100000.0, max(-100000.0, max(-100000.0, max(-100000.0, max(-(if roo.spl38.portFlowDirection_2 == Modelica.Fluid.Types.PortFlowDirection.Leaving then 0.0 else 9.999999999999999e+59), 0.0)))))) assert | warning | Nominal variable violating min/max constraint: -min(100000.0, min(100000.0, min(9.999999999999999e+59, min(9.999999999999999e+59, min(-(if roo.spl38.portFlowDirection_2 == Modelica.Fluid.Types.PortFlowDirection.Entering then 0.0 else -9.999999999999999e+59), 100000.0))))) <= $cse30 <= -max(-100000.0, max(-100000.0, max(-100000.0, max(-100000.0, max(-(if roo.spl38.portFlowDirection_2 == Modelica.Fluid.Types.PortFlowDirection.Leaving then 0.0 else 9.999999999999999e+59), 0.0))))), has value: 0.1584 assert | warning | The following assertion has been violated at time 0.000000 | | | | roo.roo48.vav.m_flow_nominal_pos >= (-min(100000.0, min(100000.0, min(9.999999999999999e+59, min(9.999999999999999e+59, min(-(if roo.spl37.portFlowDirection_3 == Modelica.Fluid.Types.PortFlowDirection.Entering then 0.0 else -9.999999999999999e+59), 100000.0)))))) and roo.roo48.vav.m_flow_nominal_pos <= (-max(-100000.0, max(-100000.0, max(-100000.0, max(-100000.0, max(-(if roo.spl37.portFlowDirection_3 == Modelica.Fluid.Types.PortFlowDirection.Leaving then 0.0 else 9.999999999999999e+59), 0.0)))))) assert | warning | Nominal variable violating min/max constraint: -min(100000.0, min(100000.0, min(9.999999999999999e+59, min(9.999999999999999e+59, min(-(if roo.spl37.portFlowDirection_3 == Modelica.Fluid.Types.PortFlowDirection.Entering then 0.0 else -9.999999999999999e+59), 100000.0))))) <= $cse31 <= -max(-100000.0, max(-100000.0, max(-100000.0, max(-100000.0, max(-(if roo.spl37.portFlowDirection_3 == Modelica.Fluid.Types.PortFlowDirection.Leaving then 0.0 else 9.999999999999999e+59), 0.0))))), has value: 0.9612 assert | warning | The following assertion has been violated at time 0.000000 | | | | roo.roo47.vav.m_flow_nominal_pos >= (-min(100000.0, min(100000.0, min(9.999999999999999e+59, min(9.999999999999999e+59, min(-(if roo.spl36.portFlowDirection_3 == Modelica.Fluid.Types.PortFlowDirection.Entering then 0.0 else -9.999999999999999e+59), 100000.0)))))) and roo.roo47.vav.m_flow_nominal_pos <= (-max(-100000.0, max(-100000.0, max(-100000.0, max(-100000.0, max(-(if roo.spl36.portFlowDirection_3 == Modelica.Fluid.Types.PortFlowDirection.Leaving then 0.0 else 9.999999999999999e+59), 0.0)))))) assert | warning | Nominal variable violating min/max constraint: -min(100000.0, min(100000.0, min(9.999999999999999e+59, min(9.999999999999999e+59, min(-(if roo.spl36.portFlowDirection_3 == Modelica.Fluid.Types.PortFlowDirection.Entering then 0.0 else -9.999999999999999e+59), 100000.0))))) <= $cse33 <= -max(-100000.0, max(-100000.0, max(-100000.0, max(-100000.0, max(-(if roo.spl36.portFlowDirection_3 == Modelica.Fluid.Types.PortFlowDirection.Leaving then 0.0 else 9.999999999999999e+59), 0.0))))), has value: 1.0044 assert | warning | The following assertion has been violated at time 0.000000 | | | | roo.roo46.vav.m_flow_nominal_pos >= (-min(100000.0, min(100000.0, min(9.999999999999999e+59, min(9.999999999999999e+59, min(-(if roo.spl35.portFlowDirection_3 == Modelica.Fluid.Types.PortFlowDirection.Entering then 0.0 else -9.999999999999999e+59), 100000.0)))))) and roo.roo46.vav.m_flow_nominal_pos <= (-max(-100000.0, max(-100000.0, max(-100000.0, max(-100000.0, max(-(if roo.spl35.portFlowDirection_3 == Modelica.Fluid.Types.PortFlowDirection.Leaving then 0.0 else 9.999999999999999e+59), 0.0)))))) assert | warning | Nominal variable violating min/max constraint: -min(100000.0, min(100000.0, min(9.999999999999999e+59, min(9.999999999999999e+59, min(-(if roo.spl35.portFlowDirection_3 == Modelica.Fluid.Types.PortFlowDirection.Entering then 0.0 else -9.999999999999999e+59), 100000.0))))) <= $cse35 <= -max(-100000.0, max(-100000.0, max(-100000.0, max(-100000.0, max(-(if roo.spl35.portFlowDirection_3 == Modelica.Fluid.Types.PortFlowDirection.Leaving then 0.0 else 9.999999999999999e+59), 0.0))))), has value: 2.8428 assert | warning | The following assertion has been violated at time 0.000000 | | | | roo.roo45.vav.m_flow_nominal_pos >= (-min(100000.0, min(100000.0, min(9.999999999999999e+59, min(9.999999999999999e+59, min(-(if roo.spl34.portFlowDirection_3 == Modelica.Fluid.Types.PortFlowDirection.Entering then 0.0 else -9.999999999999999e+59), 100000.0)))))) and roo.roo45.vav.m_flow_nominal_pos <= (-max(-100000.0, max(-100000.0, max(-100000.0, max(-100000.0, max(-(if roo.spl34.portFlowDirection_3 == Modelica.Fluid.Types.PortFlowDirection.Leaving then 0.0 else 9.999999999999999e+59), 0.0)))))) assert | warning | Nominal variable violating min/max constraint: -min(100000.0, min(100000.0, min(9.999999999999999e+59, min(9.999999999999999e+59, min(-(if roo.spl34.portFlowDirection_3 == Modelica.Fluid.Types.PortFlowDirection.Entering then 0.0 else -9.999999999999999e+59), 100000.0))))) <= $cse39 <= -max(-100000.0, max(-100000.0, max(-100000.0, max(-100000.0, max(-(if roo.spl34.portFlowDirection_3 == Modelica.Fluid.Types.PortFlowDirection.Leaving then 0.0 else 9.999999999999999e+59), 0.0))))), has value: 5.196 LOG_SUCCESS | info | The initialization finished successfully with 3 homotopy steps. assert | warning | The following assertion has been violated at time 2.583379 | | | | roo.roo48.dpPle.m_flow >= 0.0 and roo.roo48.dpPle.m_flow <= 100000.0 assert | warning | Variable violating min/max constraint: 0.0 <= roo.roo48.dpPle.m_flow <= 100000.0, has value: -2.91402e-12 assert | warning | The following assertion has been violated at time 2.583379 | | | | roo.roo49.dpPle.m_flow >= 0.0 and roo.roo49.dpPle.m_flow <= 100000.0 assert | warning | Variable violating min/max constraint: 0.0 <= roo.roo49.dpPle.m_flow <= 100000.0, has value: -2.19734e-12 stdout | info | Chattering detected around time 2.5833790605..2.5924160993 (100 state events in a row with a total time delta less than the step size 34.56). This can be a performance bottleneck. Use -lv LOG_EVENTS for more information. The zero-crossing was: (-roo.mix54.res3.m_flow) > 0.0 assert | debug | Aborting simulation due to chattering being detected and the simulation flags requesting we do not continue further.