Running: ./testmodel.py --libraries=/var/lib/jenkins/ws/OpenModelicaLibraryTestingWork/OpenModelica/./OMCompiler/build/lib/omlibrary/ --ompython_omhome=/usr Buildings_6.0.0_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.conf.json Using package Buildings with version 6.0.0 (/var/lib/jenkins/ws/OpenModelicaLibraryTestingWork/OpenModelica/OMCompiler/build/lib/omlibrary/Buildings 6.0.0/package.mo) Using package Modelica with version 3.2.2 (/var/lib/jenkins/ws/OpenModelicaLibraryTestingWork/OpenModelica/OMCompiler/build/lib/omlibrary/Modelica 3.2.2/package.mo) Using package Complex with version 3.2.2 (/var/lib/jenkins/ws/OpenModelicaLibraryTestingWork/OpenModelica/OMCompiler/build/lib/omlibrary/Complex 3.2.2.mo) Using package ModelicaServices with version 3.2.2 (/var/lib/jenkins/ws/OpenModelicaLibraryTestingWork/OpenModelica/OMCompiler/build/lib/omlibrary/ModelicaServices 3.2.2/package.mo) Running command: translateModel(Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU,tolerance=1e-06,outputFormat="empty",numberOfIntervals=5000,variableFilter="",fileNamePrefix="Buildings_6.0.0_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU") Notification: Performance of loadFile(/var/lib/jenkins/ws/OpenModelicaLibraryTestingWork/OpenModelica/OMCompiler/build/lib/omlibrary/ModelicaServices 3.2.2/package.mo): time 0.009467/0.00947, allocations: 112.2 kB / 15.06 MB, free: 5.582 MB / 13.93 MB Notification: Performance of loadFile(/var/lib/jenkins/ws/OpenModelicaLibraryTestingWork/OpenModelica/OMCompiler/build/lib/omlibrary/Complex 3.2.2.mo): time 0.002564/0.002563, allocations: 181.2 kB / 15.94 MB, free: 5.551 MB / 13.93 MB Notification: Performance of loadFile(/var/lib/jenkins/ws/OpenModelicaLibraryTestingWork/OpenModelica/OMCompiler/build/lib/omlibrary/Modelica 3.2.2/package.mo): time 1.93/1.93, allocations: 194.6 MB / 211.3 MB, free: 11.08 MB / 170.7 MB Notification: Performance of loadFile(/var/lib/jenkins/ws/OpenModelicaLibraryTestingWork/OpenModelica/OMCompiler/build/lib/omlibrary/Buildings 6.0.0/package.mo): time 2.172/2.172, allocations: 236.1 MB / 492.6 MB, free: 11.32 MB / 394.7 MB Notification: Performance of FrontEnd - loaded program: time 0.0004656/0.0004658, allocations: 12 kB / 0.5869 GB, free: 2.164 MB / 490.7 MB Notification: Performance of FrontEnd - Absyn->SCode: time 0.5387/0.5392, allocations: 98.72 MB / 0.6833 GB, free: 16.84 MB / 0.5261 GB Notification: Performance of FrontEnd - scodeFlatten: time 1.029/1.568, allocations: 445.9 MB / 1.119 GB, free: 6.812 MB / 0.7292 GB Notification: Performance of FrontEnd - mkProgramGraph: time 0.0002565/1.568, allocations: 103.2 kB / 1.119 GB, free: 6.758 MB / 0.7292 GB Notification: Performance of FrontEnd - DAE generated: time 4.62/6.188, allocations: 0.8314 GB / 1.95 GB, free: 123 MB / 0.823 GB Notification: Performance of FrontEnd: time 2.473e-06/6.188, allocations: 0 / 1.95 GB, free: 123 MB / 0.823 GB Notification: Performance of Transformations before backend: time 0.001693/6.19, allocations: 176.4 kB / 1.95 GB, free: 122.9 MB / 0.823 GB Notification: Model statistics after passing the front-end and creating the data structures used by the back-end: * Number of equations: 831 * Number of variables: 831 Notification: Performance of Generate backend data structure: time 0.04093/6.231, allocations: 11.86 MB / 1.962 GB, free: 119.6 MB / 0.823 GB Notification: Performance of prepare preOptimizeDAE: time 3.87e-05/6.231, allocations: 13.56 kB / 1.962 GB, free: 119.6 MB / 0.823 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt normalInlineFunction (simulation): time 0.006135/6.237, allocations: 0.8554 MB / 1.963 GB, free: 119.2 MB / 0.823 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt evaluateParameters (simulation): time 0.07005/6.307, allocations: 24.32 MB / 1.987 GB, free: 117.8 MB / 0.823 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt simplifyIfEquations (simulation): time 0.0004261/6.307, allocations: 335.8 kB / 1.987 GB, free: 117.8 MB / 0.823 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt expandDerOperator (simulation): time 0.00202/6.31, allocations: 478.2 kB / 1.987 GB, free: 117.7 MB / 0.823 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt clockPartitioning (simulation): time 0.01333/6.323, allocations: 5.375 MB / 1.993 GB, free: 117.1 MB / 0.823 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt findStateOrder (simulation): time 0.0001191/6.323, allocations: 11.06 kB / 1.993 GB, free: 117.1 MB / 0.823 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt replaceEdgeChange (simulation): time 0.0006255/6.324, allocations: 137.2 kB / 1.993 GB, free: 117.1 MB / 0.823 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt inlineArrayEqn (simulation): time 9.873e-05/6.324, allocations: 96.62 kB / 1.993 GB, free: 117.1 MB / 0.823 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt removeEqualRHS (simulation): time 0.01027/6.334, allocations: 4.337 MB / 1.997 GB, free: 117.1 MB / 0.823 GB Warning: The model contains alias variables with redundant start and/or conflicting nominal values. It is recommended to resolve the conflicts, because otherwise the system could be hard to solve. To print the conflicting alias sets and the chosen candidates please use -d=aliasConflicts. Notification: Performance of preOpt removeSimpleEquations (simulation): time 0.05431/6.388, allocations: 29.81 MB / 2.026 GB, free: 108.6 MB / 0.823 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt comSubExp (simulation): time 0.01322/6.402, allocations: 5.746 MB / 2.032 GB, free: 107.6 MB / 0.823 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt evalFunc (simulation): time 0.0293/6.431, allocations: 13.91 MB / 2.045 GB, free: 101 MB / 0.823 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt encapsulateWhenConditions (simulation): time 0.004166/6.435, allocations: 1.935 MB / 2.047 GB, free: 100.4 MB / 0.823 GB Notification: Performance of pre-optimization done (n=212): time 6.272e-06/6.435, allocations: 2.031 kB / 2.047 GB, free: 100.4 MB / 0.823 GB Notification: Performance of matching and sorting (n=220): time 0.0333/6.469, allocations: 12.34 MB / 2.059 GB, free: 94.93 MB / 0.823 GB Notification: Performance of inlineWhenForInitialization (initialization): time 5.217e-05/6.469, allocations: 102.5 kB / 2.059 GB, free: 94.84 MB / 0.823 GB Notification: Performance of selectInitializationVariablesDAE (initialization): time 0.02451/6.493, allocations: 10.71 MB / 2.07 GB, free: 88.46 MB / 0.823 GB Notification: Performance of collectPreVariables (initialization): time 0.001064/6.494, allocations: 117.7 kB / 2.07 GB, free: 88.34 MB / 0.823 GB Notification: Performance of collectInitialEqns (initialization): time 0.005549/6.5, allocations: 3.228 MB / 2.073 GB, free: 85.11 MB / 0.823 GB Notification: Performance of collectInitialBindings (initialization): time 0.001852/6.502, allocations: 0.8248 MB / 2.074 GB, free: 84.3 MB / 0.823 GB Notification: Performance of simplifyInitialFunctions (initialization): time 0.0006819/6.503, allocations: 104 kB / 2.074 GB, free: 84.2 MB / 0.823 GB Notification: Performance of setup shared object (initialization): time 0.0005786/6.503, allocations: 0.5341 MB / 2.075 GB, free: 83.66 MB / 0.823 GB Notification: Performance of preBalanceInitialSystem (initialization): time 0.006082/6.509, allocations: 3.054 MB / 2.078 GB, free: 80.59 MB / 0.823 GB Notification: Performance of partitionIndependentBlocks (initialization): time 0.008333/6.518, allocations: 6.108 MB / 2.084 GB, free: 73.31 MB / 0.823 GB Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[2] = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2]) = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2])) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[2] = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2]) = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2])) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[2] = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2]) = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2])) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[2] = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2]) = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2])) Notification: Performance of analyzeInitialSystem (initialization): time 0.05583/6.573, allocations: 26.1 MB / 2.109 GB, free: 47.25 MB / 0.823 GB Notification: Performance of solveInitialSystemEqSystem (initialization): time 6.69e-05/6.574, allocations: 24 kB / 2.109 GB, free: 47.22 MB / 0.823 GB Error: Internal error IndexReduction.pantelidesIndexReduction failed! System is structurally singular and cannot be handled because the number of unassigned equations is larger than the number of states. Use -d=bltdump to get more information. Error: No system for the symbolic initialization was generated