startTime=0
stopTime=7200
tolerance=1e-06
numberOfIntervals=2500
stepSize=2.88
Regular simulation: ./Buildings_3.0.0_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.DXCoils.BaseClasses.Examples.EvaporationPulse -abortSlowSimulation -alarm=480 -lv LOG_STATS
assert | warning | The following assertion has been violated at time 0.000000
| | | | false
assert | warning | Nominal variable violating min constraint: 0.0 <= evaSho.m, has value: -3.10146
assert | warning | The following assertion has been violated at time 0.000000
| | | | false
assert | warning | Nominal variable violating min constraint: 0.0 <= evaNor.m, has value: -3.10146
assert | warning | The following assertion has been violated during initialization at time 0.000000
| | | | evaSho.nomVal.gamma <= evaSho.gammaMax
assert | warning | *** Warning: In DX coil model, gamma is too large for these coil conditions.
| | | | Instead of gamma = 1.5, a value of 0.952861, which
| | | | corresponds to a mass transfer effectiveness of 0.8, will be used.
| | | | Coil nominal performance data are:
| | | | nomVal.m_flow_nominal = 0.497018
| | | | dX_nominal = XEvaOut_nominal-XEvaWetBulOut_nominal = 0.00614376 - 0.00710194 = -0.000958189
| | | | QLat_flow_nominal = -1000
assert | warning | The following assertion has been violated during initialization at time 0.000000
| | | | evaSho.dX_nominal > 1e-10
assert | warning | *** Warning: In DX coil model, dX_nominal = -0.000958189
| | | | This means that the coil is not dehumidifying air at the nominal conditions.
| | | | Check nominal parameters.
| | | | Nominal values:
| | | | Q_flow_nominal = -5000
| | | | COP_nominal = 3
| | | | m_flow_nominal = 0.497018
| | | | TEvaIn_nominal = 292.55 (= 19.4 degC)
| | | | TConIn_nominal = 308.15 (= 35 degC)
| | | | phiIn_nominal = 0.5
| | | | tWet = 1400
| | | | gamma = 1.5
| | | | p_nominal = 101325
assert | warning | The following assertion has been violated during initialization at time 0.000000
| | | | evaNor.nomVal.gamma <= evaNor.gammaMax
assert | warning | *** Warning: In DX coil model, gamma is too large for these coil conditions.
| | | | Instead of gamma = 1.5, a value of 0.952861, which
| | | | corresponds to a mass transfer effectiveness of 0.8, will be used.
| | | | Coil nominal performance data are:
| | | | nomVal.m_flow_nominal = 0.497018
| | | | dX_nominal = XEvaOut_nominal-XEvaWetBulOut_nominal = 0.00614376 - 0.00710194 = -0.000958189
| | | | QLat_flow_nominal = -1000
assert | warning | The following assertion has been violated during initialization at time 0.000000
| | | | evaNor.dX_nominal > 1e-10
assert | warning | *** Warning: In DX coil model, dX_nominal = -0.000958189
| | | | This means that the coil is not dehumidifying air at the nominal conditions.
| | | | Check nominal parameters.
| | | | Nominal values:
| | | | Q_flow_nominal = -5000
| | | | COP_nominal = 3
| | | | m_flow_nominal = 0.497018
| | | | TEvaIn_nominal = 292.55 (= 19.4 degC)
| | | | TConIn_nominal = 308.15 (= 35 degC)
| | | | phiIn_nominal = 0.5
| | | | tWet = 1400
| | | | gamma = 1.5
| | | | p_nominal = 101325
LOG_SUCCESS | info | The initialization finished successfully without homotopy method.
assert | warning | The following assertion has been violated at time 900.000000
| | | | evaSho.mEva_flow <= 0.0
assert | warning | Variable violating max constraint: evaSho.mEva_flow <= 0.0, has value: 0.000866258
assert | warning | The following assertion has been violated at time 900.000000
| | | | evaSho.dX >= 0.0 and evaSho.dX <= 1.0
assert | warning | Variable violating min/max constraint: 0.0 <= evaSho.dX <= 1.0, has value: -0.00233789
assert | warning | The following assertion has been violated at time 1800.000000
| | | | evaNor.mEva_flow <= 0.0
assert | warning | Variable violating max constraint: evaNor.mEva_flow <= 0.0, has value: 0.00102371
assert | warning | The following assertion has been violated at time 1800.000000
| | | | evaNor.dX >= 0.0 and evaNor.dX <= 1.0
assert | warning | Variable violating min/max constraint: 0.0 <= evaNor.dX <= 1.0, has value: -0.00233789
LOG_STATS | info | ### STATISTICS ###
| | | | | timer
| | | | | | 0.00186519s reading init.xml
| | | | | | 0.000214362s reading info.xml
| | | | | | 7.8628e-05s [ 0.2%] pre-initialization
| | | | | | 0.000265157s [ 0.8%] initialization
| | | | | | 2.5137e-05s [ 0.1%] steps
| | | | | | 0.00143845s [ 4.1%] solver (excl. callbacks)
| | | | | | 0s [ 0.0%] creating output-file
| | | | | | 0.00128495s [ 3.7%] event-handling
| | | | | | 0.00710567s [ 20.3%] overhead
| | | | | | 0.0247296s [ 70.8%] simulation
| | | | | | 0.0349275s [100.0%] total
| | | | | events
| | | | | | 10 state events
| | | | | | 0 time events
| | | | | solver: dassl
| | | | | | 347 steps taken
| | | | | | 440 calls of functionODE
| | | | | | 144 evaluations of jacobian
| | | | | | 4 error test failures
| | | | | | 0 convergence test failures
| | | | | | 0.000425722s time of jacobian evaluation
LOG_SUCCESS | info | The simulation finished successfully.