Running: ./testmodel.py --libraries=/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/ --ompython_omhome=/usr Buildings_7.0.0_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference.conf.json
Using package ModelicaServices with version 3.2.3 (/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/ModelicaServices 3.2.3+maint.om/package.mo)
Using package Modelica with version 3.2.3 (/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Modelica 3.2.3+maint.om/package.mo)
Using package Complex with version 3.2.3 (/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Complex 3.2.3+maint.om/package.mo)
Using package Buildings with version 7.0.1 (/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Buildings 7.0.1/package.mo)
Running command: "" <> buildModelFMU(Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference,fileNamePrefix="Buildings_7_0_0_Buildings_Fluid_HeatExchangers_RadiantSlabs_Examples_StepResponseFiniteDifference",fmuType="me",version="2.0",platforms={"static"})
Notification: Performance of loadFile(/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Buildings 7.0.1/package.mo): time 2.242/2.242, allocations: 251 MB / 265.9 MB, free: 11.69 MB / 218.7 MB
Notification: Performance of loadFile(/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Complex 3.2.3+maint.om/package.mo): time 0.001515/0.001515, allocations: 171.3 kB / 325.5 MB, free: 2.914 MB / 250.7 MB
Notification: Performance of loadFile(/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Modelica 3.2.3+maint.om/package.mo): time 2.368/2.368, allocations: 205.4 MB / 0.5764 GB, free: 20.8 MB / 426.7 MB
Notification: Performance of loadFile(/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/ModelicaServices 3.2.3+maint.om/package.mo): time 0.002761/0.002761, allocations: 93.7 kB / 0.6809 GB, free: 13.68 MB / 0.5105 GB
Notification: Performance of FrontEnd - loaded program: time 0.0004731/0.0004731, allocations: 15.88 kB / 0.795 GB, free: 135.5 MB / 0.6042 GB
Notification: Performance of FrontEnd - Absyn->SCode: time 0.2189/0.2194, allocations: 106.3 MB / 0.8988 GB, free: 65.5 MB / 0.6042 GB
Notification: Performance of FrontEnd - scodeFlatten: time 1.305/1.524, allocations: 454.5 MB / 1.343 GB, free: 12.93 MB / 0.8542 GB
Notification: Performance of FrontEnd - mkProgramGraph: time 0.000403/1.525, allocations: 106.5 kB / 1.343 GB, free: 12.87 MB / 0.8542 GB
Notification: Performance of FrontEnd - DAE generated: time 9.082/10.61, allocations: 1.38 GB / 2.723 GB, free: 26.11 MB / 0.8855 GB
Notification: Performance of FrontEnd: time 2.685e-06/10.61, allocations: 0 / 2.723 GB, free: 26.11 MB / 0.8855 GB
Notification: Performance of Transformations before backend: time 0.002327/10.61, allocations: 167.8 kB / 2.723 GB, free: 25.94 MB / 0.8855 GB
Notification: Model statistics after passing the front-end and creating the data structures used by the back-end:
 * Number of equations: 831
 * Number of variables: 831
Notification: Performance of Generate backend data structure: time 0.05817/10.67, allocations: 11.85 MB / 2.735 GB, free: 13.99 MB / 0.8855 GB
Notification: Performance of prepare preOptimizeDAE: time 5.389e-05/10.67, allocations: 8.031 kB / 2.735 GB, free: 13.98 MB / 0.8855 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt introduceOutputAliases (simulation): time 0.002651/10.67, allocations: 475.2 kB / 2.735 GB, free: 13.5 MB / 0.8855 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt normalInlineFunction (simulation): time 0.007603/10.68, allocations: 0.8647 MB / 2.736 GB, free: 12.63 MB / 0.8855 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt evaluateParameters (simulation): time 0.09103/10.77, allocations: 24.15 MB / 2.76 GB, free: 4.422 MB / 0.9011 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt simplifyIfEquations (simulation): time 0.0006338/10.77, allocations: 326.5 kB / 2.76 GB, free: 4.102 MB / 0.9011 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt expandDerOperator (simulation): time 0.002784/10.77, allocations: 471.7 kB / 2.761 GB, free: 3.641 MB / 0.9011 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt clockPartitioning (simulation): time 0.7904/11.56, allocations: 5.394 MB / 2.766 GB, free: 139.6 MB / 0.9011 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt findStateOrder (simulation): time 0.0003254/11.56, allocations: 12.11 kB / 2.766 GB, free: 139.6 MB / 0.9011 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt replaceEdgeChange (simulation): time 0.001691/11.57, allocations: 137.1 kB / 2.766 GB, free: 139.6 MB / 0.9011 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt inlineArrayEqn (simulation): time 0.000143/11.57, allocations: 93.84 kB / 2.766 GB, free: 139.6 MB / 0.9011 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt removeEqualRHS (simulation): time 0.01522/11.58, allocations: 4.339 MB / 2.77 GB, free: 139.6 MB / 0.9011 GB
Warning: The model contains alias variables with redundant start and/or conflicting nominal values. It is recommended to resolve the conflicts, because otherwise the system could be hard to solve. To print the conflicting alias sets and the chosen candidates please use -d=aliasConflicts.
Notification: Performance of preOpt removeSimpleEquations (simulation): time 0.08452/11.67, allocations: 29.54 MB / 2.799 GB, free: 131.7 MB / 0.9011 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt comSubExp (simulation): time 0.01943/11.68, allocations: 5.78 MB / 2.805 GB, free: 131.2 MB / 0.9011 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt evalFunc (simulation): time 0.04098/11.73, allocations: 13.84 MB / 2.818 GB, free: 128.1 MB / 0.9011 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt encapsulateWhenConditions (simulation): time 0.00605/11.73, allocations: 1.981 MB / 2.82 GB, free: 128 MB / 0.9011 GB
Notification: Performance of pre-optimization done (n=214): time 8.516e-06/11.73, allocations: 0 / 2.82 GB, free: 128 MB / 0.9011 GB
Notification: Performance of matching and sorting (n=222): time 0.05026/11.78, allocations: 13.35 MB / 2.833 GB, free: 124.4 MB / 0.9011 GB
Notification: Performance of inlineWhenForInitialization (initialization): time 8.14e-05/11.78, allocations: 128.9 kB / 2.833 GB, free: 124.3 MB / 0.9011 GB
Notification: Performance of selectInitializationVariablesDAE (initialization): time 0.03399/11.82, allocations: 10.7 MB / 2.844 GB, free: 123.8 MB / 0.9011 GB
Notification: Performance of collectPreVariables (initialization): time 0.001308/11.82, allocations: 114.7 kB / 2.844 GB, free: 123.8 MB / 0.9011 GB
Notification: Performance of collectInitialEqns (initialization): time 0.008275/11.83, allocations: 3.207 MB / 2.847 GB, free: 123.2 MB / 0.9011 GB
Notification: Performance of collectInitialBindings (initialization): time 0.003143/11.83, allocations: 0.8312 MB / 2.848 GB, free: 122.8 MB / 0.9011 GB
Notification: Performance of simplifyInitialFunctions (initialization): time 0.001647/11.83, allocations: 101.7 kB / 2.848 GB, free: 122.8 MB / 0.9011 GB
Notification: Performance of setup shared object (initialization): time 0.001018/11.83, allocations: 0.5306 MB / 2.849 GB, free: 122.5 MB / 0.9011 GB
Notification: Performance of preBalanceInitialSystem (initialization): time 0.009008/11.84, allocations: 3.057 MB / 2.852 GB, free: 122.5 MB / 0.9011 GB
Notification: Performance of partitionIndependentBlocks (initialization): time 0.01107/11.85, allocations: 5.515 MB / 2.857 GB, free: 119.4 MB / 0.9011 GB
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[2] = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2]) = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2]))
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[2] = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2]) = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2]))
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[2] = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2]) = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2]))
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[2] = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2]) = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2]))
Notification: Performance of analyzeInitialSystem (initialization): time 0.07971/11.93, allocations: 26.09 MB / 2.882 GB, free: 118.4 MB / 0.9011 GB
Notification: Performance of solveInitialSystemEqSystem (initialization): time 0.0001451/11.93, allocations: 26.47 kB / 2.882 GB, free: 118.4 MB / 0.9011 GB
Error: Internal error IndexReduction.pantelidesIndexReduction failed! System is structurally singular and cannot be handled because the number of unassigned equations is larger than the number of states. Use -d=bltdump to get more information.
Error: No system for the symbolic initialization was generated