Running: ./testmodel.py --libraries=/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/ --ompython_omhome=/usr Buildings_7.0.0_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.conf.json
Using package ModelicaServices with version 3.2.3 (/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/ModelicaServices 3.2.3+maint.om/package.mo)
Using package Modelica with version 3.2.3 (/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Modelica 3.2.3+maint.om/package.mo)
Using package Complex with version 3.2.3 (/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Complex 3.2.3+maint.om/package.mo)
Using package Buildings with version 7.0.1 (/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Buildings 7.0.1/package.mo)
Running command: "" <> buildModelFMU(Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU,fileNamePrefix="Buildings_7_0_0_Buildings_Fluid_HeatExchangers_RadiantSlabs_Examples_StepResponseEpsilonNTU",fmuType="me",version="2.0",platforms={"static"})
Notification: Performance of loadFile(/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Buildings 7.0.1/package.mo): time 2.182/2.182, allocations: 251 MB / 265.9 MB, free: 11.68 MB / 218.7 MB
Notification: Performance of loadFile(/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Complex 3.2.3+maint.om/package.mo): time 0.001552/0.001551, allocations: 179.4 kB / 325.5 MB, free: 2.879 MB / 250.7 MB
Notification: Performance of loadFile(/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Modelica 3.2.3+maint.om/package.mo): time 2.564/2.564, allocations: 205.4 MB / 0.5764 GB, free: 21.15 MB / 426.7 MB
Notification: Performance of loadFile(/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/ModelicaServices 3.2.3+maint.om/package.mo): time 0.001167/0.001167, allocations: 98.11 kB / 0.6809 GB, free: 14.04 MB / 0.5105 GB
Notification: Performance of FrontEnd - loaded program: time 0.000492/0.0004921, allocations: 11.69 kB / 0.795 GB, free: 135.7 MB / 0.6042 GB
Notification: Performance of FrontEnd - Absyn->SCode: time 0.2189/0.2194, allocations: 106.3 MB / 0.8988 GB, free: 65.91 MB / 0.6042 GB
Notification: Performance of FrontEnd - scodeFlatten: time 1.301/1.52, allocations: 454.3 MB / 1.343 GB, free: 13.75 MB / 0.8542 GB
Notification: Performance of FrontEnd - mkProgramGraph: time 0.0003469/1.52, allocations: 106.7 kB / 1.343 GB, free: 13.69 MB / 0.8542 GB
Notification: Performance of FrontEnd - DAE generated: time 5.715/7.235, allocations: 0.7853 GB / 2.128 GB, free: 132.9 MB / 0.8855 GB
Notification: Performance of FrontEnd: time 2.425e-06/7.236, allocations: 0 / 2.128 GB, free: 132.9 MB / 0.8855 GB
Notification: Performance of Transformations before backend: time 0.002053/7.238, allocations: 168 kB / 2.128 GB, free: 132.8 MB / 0.8855 GB
Notification: Model statistics after passing the front-end and creating the data structures used by the back-end:
 * Number of equations: 831
 * Number of variables: 831
Notification: Performance of Generate backend data structure: time 0.0584/7.296, allocations: 11.85 MB / 2.14 GB, free: 130.1 MB / 0.8855 GB
Notification: Performance of prepare preOptimizeDAE: time 4.815e-05/7.296, allocations: 9.656 kB / 2.14 GB, free: 130.1 MB / 0.8855 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt introduceOutputAliases (simulation): time 0.002532/7.299, allocations: 480.8 kB / 2.14 GB, free: 130.1 MB / 0.8855 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt normalInlineFunction (simulation): time 0.007367/7.306, allocations: 0.8565 MB / 2.141 GB, free: 129.7 MB / 0.8855 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt evaluateParameters (simulation): time 0.0866/7.393, allocations: 24.14 MB / 2.165 GB, free: 128.3 MB / 0.8855 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt simplifyIfEquations (simulation): time 0.0005006/7.393, allocations: 324.7 kB / 2.165 GB, free: 128.3 MB / 0.8855 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt expandDerOperator (simulation): time 0.002361/7.396, allocations: 458 kB / 2.165 GB, free: 128.3 MB / 0.8855 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt clockPartitioning (simulation): time 0.01681/7.412, allocations: 5.407 MB / 2.171 GB, free: 127.6 MB / 0.8855 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt findStateOrder (simulation): time 0.0001556/7.413, allocations: 17.03 kB / 2.171 GB, free: 127.6 MB / 0.8855 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt replaceEdgeChange (simulation): time 0.0008166/7.414, allocations: 135.4 kB / 2.171 GB, free: 127.6 MB / 0.8855 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt inlineArrayEqn (simulation): time 0.0001177/7.414, allocations: 92.09 kB / 2.171 GB, free: 127.6 MB / 0.8855 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt removeEqualRHS (simulation): time 0.01264/7.426, allocations: 4.346 MB / 2.175 GB, free: 127.6 MB / 0.8855 GB
Warning: The model contains alias variables with redundant start and/or conflicting nominal values. It is recommended to resolve the conflicts, because otherwise the system could be hard to solve. To print the conflicting alias sets and the chosen candidates please use -d=aliasConflicts.
Notification: Performance of preOpt removeSimpleEquations (simulation): time 0.07202/7.498, allocations: 29.54 MB / 2.204 GB, free: 119.2 MB / 0.8855 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt comSubExp (simulation): time 0.01827/7.517, allocations: 5.777 MB / 2.21 GB, free: 118.6 MB / 0.8855 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt evalFunc (simulation): time 0.03693/7.554, allocations: 13.85 MB / 2.223 GB, free: 115.4 MB / 0.8855 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt encapsulateWhenConditions (simulation): time 0.004853/7.559, allocations: 1.97 MB / 2.225 GB, free: 115.3 MB / 0.8855 GB
Notification: Performance of pre-optimization done (n=214): time 5.641e-06/7.559, allocations: 0 / 2.225 GB, free: 115.3 MB / 0.8855 GB
Notification: Performance of matching and sorting (n=222): time 0.04476/7.603, allocations: 13.36 MB / 2.238 GB, free: 111.6 MB / 0.8855 GB
Notification: Performance of inlineWhenForInitialization (initialization): time 7.445e-05/7.604, allocations: 135.4 kB / 2.238 GB, free: 111.4 MB / 0.8855 GB
Notification: Performance of selectInitializationVariablesDAE (initialization): time 0.03396/7.637, allocations: 10.7 MB / 2.249 GB, free: 110.9 MB / 0.8855 GB
Notification: Performance of collectPreVariables (initialization): time 0.001124/7.639, allocations: 117.5 kB / 2.249 GB, free: 110.9 MB / 0.8855 GB
Notification: Performance of collectInitialEqns (initialization): time 0.006281/7.645, allocations: 3.209 MB / 2.252 GB, free: 110.2 MB / 0.8855 GB
Notification: Performance of collectInitialBindings (initialization): time 0.002348/7.647, allocations: 0.8231 MB / 2.253 GB, free: 109.7 MB / 0.8855 GB
Notification: Performance of simplifyInitialFunctions (initialization): time 0.0008959/7.648, allocations: 100 kB / 2.253 GB, free: 109.7 MB / 0.8855 GB
Notification: Performance of setup shared object (initialization): time 0.0006499/7.649, allocations: 0.5362 MB / 2.253 GB, free: 109.3 MB / 0.8855 GB
Notification: Performance of preBalanceInitialSystem (initialization): time 0.008115/7.657, allocations: 3.054 MB / 2.256 GB, free: 109.3 MB / 0.8855 GB
Notification: Performance of partitionIndependentBlocks (initialization): time 0.009841/7.667, allocations: 5.516 MB / 2.262 GB, free: 105.9 MB / 0.8855 GB
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[2] = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2]) = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2]))
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[2] = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2]) = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2]))
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[2] = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2]) = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2]))
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[2] = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2]) = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2]))
Notification: Performance of analyzeInitialSystem (initialization): time 0.07535/7.742, allocations: 26.09 MB / 2.287 GB, free: 98.98 MB / 0.8855 GB
Notification: Performance of solveInitialSystemEqSystem (initialization): time 8.752e-05/7.742, allocations: 25.69 kB / 2.287 GB, free: 98.98 MB / 0.8855 GB
Error: Internal error IndexReduction.pantelidesIndexReduction failed! System is structurally singular and cannot be handled because the number of unassigned equations is larger than the number of states. Use -d=bltdump to get more information.
Error: No system for the symbolic initialization was generated