Running: ./testmodel.py --libraries=/var/lib/jenkins/ws/OpenModelicaLibraryTestingWork/OpenModelica/./OMCompiler/build/lib/omlibrary/ --ompython_omhome=/usr Buildings_6.0.0_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference.conf.json
Using package Buildings with version 6.0.0 (/var/lib/jenkins/ws/OpenModelicaLibraryTestingWork/OpenModelica/OMCompiler/build/lib/omlibrary/Buildings 6.0.0/package.mo)
Using package Modelica with version 3.2.2 (/var/lib/jenkins/ws/OpenModelicaLibraryTestingWork/OpenModelica/OMCompiler/build/lib/omlibrary/Modelica 3.2.2/package.mo)
Using package Complex with version 3.2.2 (/var/lib/jenkins/ws/OpenModelicaLibraryTestingWork/OpenModelica/OMCompiler/build/lib/omlibrary/Complex 3.2.2.mo)
Using package ModelicaServices with version 3.2.2 (/var/lib/jenkins/ws/OpenModelicaLibraryTestingWork/OpenModelica/OMCompiler/build/lib/omlibrary/ModelicaServices 3.2.2/package.mo)
Running command: "" <> buildModelFMU(Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference,fileNamePrefix="Buildings_6_0_0_Buildings_Fluid_HeatExchangers_RadiantSlabs_Examples_StepResponseFiniteDifference",fmuType="me",version="2.0",platforms={"static"})
Notification: Performance of loadFile(/var/lib/jenkins/ws/OpenModelicaLibraryTestingWork/OpenModelica/OMCompiler/build/lib/omlibrary/ModelicaServices 3.2.2/package.mo): time 0.01178/0.01178, allocations: 107.7 kB / 15.05 MB, free: 5.934 MB / 13.93 MB
Notification: Performance of loadFile(/var/lib/jenkins/ws/OpenModelicaLibraryTestingWork/OpenModelica/OMCompiler/build/lib/omlibrary/Complex 3.2.2.mo): time 0.001326/0.001326, allocations: 181.5 kB / 15.94 MB, free: 5.898 MB / 13.93 MB
Notification: Performance of loadFile(/var/lib/jenkins/ws/OpenModelicaLibraryTestingWork/OpenModelica/OMCompiler/build/lib/omlibrary/Modelica 3.2.2/package.mo): time 2.156/2.156, allocations: 194.6 MB / 211.3 MB, free: 11.08 MB / 170.7 MB
Notification: Performance of loadFile(/var/lib/jenkins/ws/OpenModelicaLibraryTestingWork/OpenModelica/OMCompiler/build/lib/omlibrary/Buildings 6.0.0/package.mo): time 2.295/2.295, allocations: 236.2 MB / 492.6 MB, free: 11.36 MB / 394.7 MB
Notification: Performance of FrontEnd - loaded program: time 0.0005007/0.0005007, allocations: 12 kB / 0.587 GB, free: 2.066 MB / 490.7 MB
Notification: Performance of FrontEnd - Absyn->SCode: time 0.8827/0.8832, allocations: 98.72 MB / 0.6834 GB, free: 16.66 MB / 0.5261 GB
Notification: Performance of FrontEnd - scodeFlatten: time 1.487/2.37, allocations: 446 MB / 1.119 GB, free: 3.605 MB / 0.7292 GB
Notification: Performance of FrontEnd - mkProgramGraph: time 0.0003443/2.371, allocations: 107.4 kB / 1.119 GB, free: 3.547 MB / 0.7292 GB
Notification: Performance of FrontEnd - DAE generated: time 10.56/12.93, allocations: 1.474 GB / 2.593 GB, free: 93 MB / 0.8542 GB
Notification: Performance of FrontEnd: time 3.787e-06/12.93, allocations: 0 / 2.593 GB, free: 93 MB / 0.8542 GB
Notification: Performance of Transformations before backend: time 0.002365/12.94, allocations: 173 kB / 2.593 GB, free: 92.98 MB / 0.8542 GB
Notification: Model statistics after passing the front-end and creating the data structures used by the back-end:
 * Number of equations: 831
 * Number of variables: 831
Notification: Performance of Generate backend data structure: time 0.06256/13, allocations: 11.87 MB / 2.605 GB, free: 90 MB / 0.8542 GB
Notification: Performance of prepare preOptimizeDAE: time 5.435e-05/13, allocations: 9.281 kB / 2.605 GB, free: 90 MB / 0.8542 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt introduceOutputAliases (simulation): time 0.00289/13, allocations: 478.4 kB / 2.605 GB, free: 89.94 MB / 0.8542 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt normalInlineFunction (simulation): time 0.008891/13.01, allocations: 0.8629 MB / 2.606 GB, free: 89.51 MB / 0.8542 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt evaluateParameters (simulation): time 0.09303/13.1, allocations: 24.34 MB / 2.63 GB, free: 88.11 MB / 0.8542 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt simplifyIfEquations (simulation): time 0.000579/13.11, allocations: 329.5 kB / 2.63 GB, free: 88.11 MB / 0.8542 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt expandDerOperator (simulation): time 0.002922/13.11, allocations: 481 kB / 2.631 GB, free: 88.1 MB / 0.8542 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt clockPartitioning (simulation): time 0.01921/13.13, allocations: 5.373 MB / 2.636 GB, free: 87.45 MB / 0.8542 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt findStateOrder (simulation): time 0.0002421/13.13, allocations: 7.281 kB / 2.636 GB, free: 87.45 MB / 0.8542 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt replaceEdgeChange (simulation): time 0.001589/13.13, allocations: 141.9 kB / 2.636 GB, free: 87.45 MB / 0.8542 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt inlineArrayEqn (simulation): time 0.0001417/13.13, allocations: 97.12 kB / 2.636 GB, free: 87.45 MB / 0.8542 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt removeEqualRHS (simulation): time 0.0138/13.14, allocations: 4.336 MB / 2.64 GB, free: 87.42 MB / 0.8542 GB
Warning: The model contains alias variables with redundant start and/or conflicting nominal values. It is recommended to resolve the conflicts, because otherwise the system could be hard to solve. To print the conflicting alias sets and the chosen candidates please use -d=aliasConflicts.
Notification: Performance of preOpt removeSimpleEquations (simulation): time 0.07749/13.22, allocations: 29.81 MB / 2.669 GB, free: 78.98 MB / 0.8542 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt comSubExp (simulation): time 0.01884/13.24, allocations: 5.745 MB / 2.675 GB, free: 78.41 MB / 0.8542 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt evalFunc (simulation): time 0.04066/13.28, allocations: 13.9 MB / 2.689 GB, free: 75.38 MB / 0.8542 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt encapsulateWhenConditions (simulation): time 0.005393/13.29, allocations: 1.943 MB / 2.691 GB, free: 75.29 MB / 0.8542 GB
Notification: Performance of pre-optimization done (n=212): time 6.442e-06/13.29, allocations: 1.969 kB / 2.691 GB, free: 75.29 MB / 0.8542 GB
Notification: Performance of matching and sorting (n=220): time 0.04572/13.33, allocations: 12.34 MB / 2.703 GB, free: 71.52 MB / 0.8542 GB
Notification: Performance of inlineWhenForInitialization (initialization): time 6.886e-05/13.33, allocations: 106.6 kB / 2.703 GB, free: 71.42 MB / 0.8542 GB
Notification: Performance of selectInitializationVariablesDAE (initialization): time 0.03337/13.37, allocations: 10.71 MB / 2.713 GB, free: 68.18 MB / 0.8542 GB
Notification: Performance of collectPreVariables (initialization): time 0.001433/13.37, allocations: 121.5 kB / 2.713 GB, free: 68.08 MB / 0.8542 GB
Notification: Performance of collectInitialEqns (initialization): time 0.007671/13.37, allocations: 3.225 MB / 2.716 GB, free: 65.66 MB / 0.8542 GB
Notification: Performance of collectInitialBindings (initialization): time 0.00261/13.38, allocations: 0.827 MB / 2.717 GB, free: 65.04 MB / 0.8542 GB
Notification: Performance of simplifyInitialFunctions (initialization): time 0.001267/13.38, allocations: 102 kB / 2.717 GB, free: 64.96 MB / 0.8542 GB
Notification: Performance of setup shared object (initialization): time 0.0008605/13.38, allocations: 0.5277 MB / 2.718 GB, free: 64.57 MB / 0.8542 GB
Notification: Performance of preBalanceInitialSystem (initialization): time 0.008567/13.39, allocations: 3.062 MB / 2.721 GB, free: 63.78 MB / 0.8542 GB
Notification: Performance of partitionIndependentBlocks (initialization): time 0.01191/13.4, allocations: 6.108 MB / 2.727 GB, free: 59.44 MB / 0.8542 GB
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[2] = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2]) = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2]))
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[2] = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2]) = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2]))
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[2] = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2]) = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2]))
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[2] = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2]) = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2]))
Notification: Performance of analyzeInitialSystem (initialization): time 0.08107/13.48, allocations: 26.1 MB / 2.752 GB, free: 51.36 MB / 0.8542 GB
Notification: Performance of solveInitialSystemEqSystem (initialization): time 0.0001104/13.48, allocations: 26.66 kB / 2.752 GB, free: 51.34 MB / 0.8542 GB
Error: Internal error IndexReduction.pantelidesIndexReduction failed! System is structurally singular and cannot be handled because the number of unassigned equations is larger than the number of states. Use -d=bltdump to get more information.
Error: No system for the symbolic initialization was generated