Running: ./testmodel.py --libraries=/var/lib/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/ --ompython_omhome=/usr Buildings_7.0.0_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference.conf.json
Using package ModelicaServices with version 3.2.3 (/var/lib/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/ModelicaServices 3.2.3+maint.om/package.mo)
Using package Modelica with version 3.2.3 (/var/lib/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Modelica 3.2.3+maint.om/package.mo)
Using package Complex with version 3.2.3 (/var/lib/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Complex 3.2.3+maint.om/package.mo)
Using package Buildings with version 7.0.1 (/var/lib/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Buildings 7.0.1/package.mo)
Running command: translateModel(Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference,tolerance=1e-06,outputFormat="empty",numberOfIntervals=5000,variableFilter="",fileNamePrefix="Buildings_7.0.0_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference")
Notification: Performance of loadFile(/var/lib/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Buildings 7.0.1/package.mo): time 2.312/2.312, allocations: 252.6 MB / 265.2 MB, free: 5.621 MB / 202.7 MB
Notification: Performance of loadFile(/var/lib/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Complex 3.2.3+maint.om/package.mo): time 0.001542/0.001541, allocations: 185.8 kB / 324.5 MB, free: 14.4 MB / 266.7 MB
Notification: Performance of loadFile(/var/lib/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Modelica 3.2.3+maint.om/package.mo): time 2.085/2.085, allocations: 205.4 MB / 0.5754 GB, free: 10.48 MB / 426.7 MB
Notification: Performance of loadFile(/var/lib/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/ModelicaServices 3.2.3+maint.om/package.mo): time 0.00108/0.00108, allocations: 94.31 kB / 0.6797 GB, free: 15.72 MB / 0.5261 GB
Notification: Performance of FrontEnd - loaded program: time 3.965e-05/3.98e-05, allocations: 4 kB / 0.7911 GB, free: 96.61 MB / 0.5417 GB
Notification: Performance of FrontEnd - Absyn->SCode: time 0.2109/0.211, allocations: 106.2 MB / 0.8949 GB, free: 6.266 MB / 0.5573 GB
Notification: Performance of FrontEnd - scodeFlatten: time 1.961/2.172, allocations: 454.4 MB / 1.339 GB, free: 244.8 MB / 0.8698 GB
Notification: Performance of FrontEnd - mkProgramGraph: time 0.0003511/2.172, allocations: 98.16 kB / 1.339 GB, free: 244.8 MB / 0.8698 GB
Notification: Performance of FrontEnd - DAE generated: time 9.327/11.5, allocations: 1.38 GB / 2.719 GB, free: 117.1 MB / 0.9011 GB
Notification: Performance of FrontEnd: time 2.464e-06/11.5, allocations: 0 / 2.719 GB, free: 117.1 MB / 0.9011 GB
Notification: Performance of Transformations before backend: time 0.002434/11.5, allocations: 175.2 kB / 2.719 GB, free: 117.1 MB / 0.9011 GB
Notification: Model statistics after passing the front-end and creating the data structures used by the back-end:
 * Number of equations: 831
 * Number of variables: 831
Notification: Performance of Generate backend data structure: time 0.03193/11.53, allocations: 6.875 MB / 2.726 GB, free: 114.9 MB / 0.9011 GB
Notification: Performance of prepare preOptimizeDAE: time 5.639e-05/11.53, allocations: 10.69 kB / 2.726 GB, free: 114.9 MB / 0.9011 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt normalInlineFunction (simulation): time 0.008047/11.54, allocations: 0.8494 MB / 2.726 GB, free: 114.5 MB / 0.9011 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt evaluateParameters (simulation): time 0.08843/11.63, allocations: 23.59 MB / 2.749 GB, free: 113 MB / 0.9011 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt simplifyIfEquations (simulation): time 0.0006167/11.63, allocations: 324.2 kB / 2.75 GB, free: 113 MB / 0.9011 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt expandDerOperator (simulation): time 0.002816/11.63, allocations: 460.5 kB / 2.75 GB, free: 113 MB / 0.9011 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt clockPartitioning (simulation): time 0.0177/11.65, allocations: 5.332 MB / 2.755 GB, free: 112.4 MB / 0.9011 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt findStateOrder (simulation): time 0.0001991/11.65, allocations: 13.53 kB / 2.755 GB, free: 112.4 MB / 0.9011 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt replaceEdgeChange (simulation): time 0.00125/11.65, allocations: 139.4 kB / 2.756 GB, free: 112.4 MB / 0.9011 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt inlineArrayEqn (simulation): time 0.0001386/11.65, allocations: 91.12 kB / 2.756 GB, free: 112.4 MB / 0.9011 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt removeEqualRHS (simulation): time 0.01244/11.67, allocations: 4.237 MB / 2.76 GB, free: 112.4 MB / 0.9011 GB
Warning: The model contains alias variables with conflicting start and/or nominal values. It is recommended to resolve the conflicts, because otherwise the system could be hard to solve. To print the conflicting alias sets and the chosen candidates please use -d=aliasConflicts.
Notification: Performance of preOpt removeSimpleEquations (simulation): time 0.07696/11.74, allocations: 29.53 MB / 2.789 GB, free: 103.9 MB / 0.9011 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt comSubExp (simulation): time 0.01871/11.76, allocations: 5.713 MB / 2.794 GB, free: 103.3 MB / 0.9011 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt resolveLoops (simulation): time 0.006163/11.77, allocations: 2.351 MB / 2.796 GB, free: 103.3 MB / 0.9011 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt evalFunc (simulation): time 0.04159/11.81, allocations: 14.18 MB / 2.81 GB, free: 97.32 MB / 0.9011 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt encapsulateWhenConditions (simulation): time 0.005385/11.81, allocations: 1.931 MB / 2.812 GB, free: 96.73 MB / 0.9011 GB
Notification: Performance of pre-optimization done (n=214): time 8.776e-06/11.81, allocations: 0 / 2.812 GB, free: 96.73 MB / 0.9011 GB
Notification: Performance of matching and sorting (n=222): time 0.04178/11.86, allocations: 11.17 MB / 2.823 GB, free: 91.55 MB / 0.9011 GB
Notification: Performance of inlineWhenForInitialization (initialization): time 7.779e-05/11.86, allocations: 128 kB / 2.823 GB, free: 91.42 MB / 0.9011 GB
Notification: Performance of selectInitializationVariablesDAE (initialization): time 0.03241/11.89, allocations: 10.6 MB / 2.834 GB, free: 88.14 MB / 0.9011 GB
Notification: Performance of collectPreVariables (initialization): time 0.001287/11.89, allocations: 116.7 kB / 2.834 GB, free: 88.05 MB / 0.9011 GB
Notification: Performance of collectInitialEqns (initialization): time 0.007426/11.9, allocations: 3.203 MB / 2.837 GB, free: 85.64 MB / 0.9011 GB
Notification: Performance of collectInitialBindings (initialization): time 0.00273/11.9, allocations: 0.8291 MB / 2.838 GB, free: 85.02 MB / 0.9011 GB
Notification: Performance of simplifyInitialFunctions (initialization): time 0.001222/11.9, allocations: 101.5 kB / 2.838 GB, free: 84.94 MB / 0.9011 GB
Notification: Performance of setup shared object (initialization): time 0.0008564/11.9, allocations: 0.5262 MB / 2.838 GB, free: 84.55 MB / 0.9011 GB
Notification: Performance of preBalanceInitialSystem (initialization): time 0.008194/11.91, allocations: 2.996 MB / 2.841 GB, free: 83.76 MB / 0.9011 GB
Notification: Performance of partitionIndependentBlocks (initialization): time 0.01042/11.92, allocations: 5.448 MB / 2.847 GB, free: 79.76 MB / 0.9011 GB
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[2] = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2]) = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2]))
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[2] = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2]) = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2]))
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[2] = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2]) = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2]))
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[2] = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2]) = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2]))
Notification: Performance of analyzeInitialSystem (initialization): time 0.07675/12, allocations: 25.78 MB / 2.872 GB, free: 68.36 MB / 0.9011 GB
Notification: Performance of solveInitialSystemEqSystem (initialization): time 0.0001165/12, allocations: 25.59 kB / 2.872 GB, free: 68.34 MB / 0.9011 GB
Error: Internal error IndexReduction.pantelidesIndexReduction failed! System is structurally singulare and cannot handled because number of unassigned equations is larger than number of states. Use -d=bltdump to get more information.
Error: No system for the symbolic initialization was generated