Running: ./testmodel.py --libraries=/var/lib/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/ --ompython_omhome=/usr Buildings_7.0.0_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.conf.json
Using package ModelicaServices with version 3.2.3 (/var/lib/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/ModelicaServices 3.2.3+maint.om/package.mo)
Using package Modelica with version 3.2.3 (/var/lib/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Modelica 3.2.3+maint.om/package.mo)
Using package Complex with version 3.2.3 (/var/lib/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Complex 3.2.3+maint.om/package.mo)
Using package Buildings with version 7.0.1 (/var/lib/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Buildings 7.0.1/package.mo)
Running command: translateModel(Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU,tolerance=1e-06,outputFormat="empty",numberOfIntervals=5000,variableFilter="",fileNamePrefix="Buildings_7.0.0_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU")
Notification: Performance of loadFile(/var/lib/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Buildings 7.0.1/package.mo): time 2.359/2.359, allocations: 252.6 MB / 265.2 MB, free: 5.633 MB / 202.7 MB
Notification: Performance of loadFile(/var/lib/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Complex 3.2.3+maint.om/package.mo): time 0.001427/0.001427, allocations: 186.2 kB / 324.5 MB, free: 14.35 MB / 266.7 MB
Notification: Performance of loadFile(/var/lib/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Modelica 3.2.3+maint.om/package.mo): time 2.126/2.126, allocations: 205.4 MB / 0.5754 GB, free: 10.48 MB / 426.7 MB
Notification: Performance of loadFile(/var/lib/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/ModelicaServices 3.2.3+maint.om/package.mo): time 0.001471/0.001471, allocations: 93.84 kB / 0.6797 GB, free: 15.7 MB / 0.5261 GB
Notification: Performance of FrontEnd - loaded program: time 3.837e-05/3.861e-05, allocations: 4 kB / 0.7911 GB, free: 96.58 MB / 0.5417 GB
Notification: Performance of FrontEnd - Absyn->SCode: time 0.2103/0.2104, allocations: 106.2 MB / 0.8949 GB, free: 6.254 MB / 0.5573 GB
Notification: Performance of FrontEnd - scodeFlatten: time 1.914/2.124, allocations: 454.3 MB / 1.339 GB, free: 244.8 MB / 0.8698 GB
Notification: Performance of FrontEnd - mkProgramGraph: time 0.0003358/2.125, allocations: 94.02 kB / 1.339 GB, free: 244.8 MB / 0.8698 GB
Notification: Performance of FrontEnd - DAE generated: time 4.928/7.053, allocations: 0.7848 GB / 2.123 GB, free: 124.8 MB / 0.8698 GB
Notification: Performance of FrontEnd: time 2.124e-06/7.053, allocations: 0 / 2.123 GB, free: 124.8 MB / 0.8698 GB
Notification: Performance of Transformations before backend: time 0.002167/7.055, allocations: 169.2 kB / 2.124 GB, free: 124.7 MB / 0.8698 GB
Notification: Model statistics after passing the front-end and creating the data structures used by the back-end:
 * Number of equations: 831
 * Number of variables: 831
Notification: Performance of Generate backend data structure: time 0.02986/7.085, allocations: 6.884 MB / 2.13 GB, free: 120.9 MB / 0.8698 GB
Notification: Performance of prepare preOptimizeDAE: time 4.781e-05/7.085, allocations: 7.25 kB / 2.13 GB, free: 120.9 MB / 0.8698 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt normalInlineFunction (simulation): time 0.00787/7.093, allocations: 0.8544 MB / 2.131 GB, free: 120.4 MB / 0.8698 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt evaluateParameters (simulation): time 0.08297/7.176, allocations: 23.59 MB / 2.154 GB, free: 98.2 MB / 0.8698 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt simplifyIfEquations (simulation): time 0.0004871/7.177, allocations: 326.5 kB / 2.154 GB, free: 97.88 MB / 0.8698 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt expandDerOperator (simulation): time 0.002452/7.179, allocations: 463.8 kB / 2.155 GB, free: 97.42 MB / 0.8698 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt clockPartitioning (simulation): time 0.01722/7.197, allocations: 5.332 MB / 2.16 GB, free: 91.87 MB / 0.8698 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt findStateOrder (simulation): time 0.0001565/7.197, allocations: 15.8 kB / 2.16 GB, free: 91.86 MB / 0.8698 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt replaceEdgeChange (simulation): time 0.0009338/7.198, allocations: 140 kB / 2.16 GB, free: 91.72 MB / 0.8698 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt inlineArrayEqn (simulation): time 0.0001143/7.198, allocations: 95.92 kB / 2.16 GB, free: 91.62 MB / 0.8698 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt removeEqualRHS (simulation): time 0.01219/7.21, allocations: 4.239 MB / 2.164 GB, free: 87.38 MB / 0.8698 GB
Warning: The model contains alias variables with conflicting start and/or nominal values. It is recommended to resolve the conflicts, because otherwise the system could be hard to solve. To print the conflicting alias sets and the chosen candidates please use -d=aliasConflicts.
Notification: Performance of preOpt removeSimpleEquations (simulation): time 0.07501/7.285, allocations: 29.52 MB / 2.193 GB, free: 57.13 MB / 0.8698 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt comSubExp (simulation): time 0.0177/7.303, allocations: 5.707 MB / 2.199 GB, free: 51.34 MB / 0.8698 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt resolveLoops (simulation): time 0.005832/7.309, allocations: 2.349 MB / 2.201 GB, free: 48.99 MB / 0.8698 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt evalFunc (simulation): time 0.0378/7.347, allocations: 14.17 MB / 2.215 GB, free: 34.28 MB / 0.8698 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt encapsulateWhenConditions (simulation): time 0.004299/7.351, allocations: 1.931 MB / 2.217 GB, free: 32.33 MB / 0.8698 GB
Notification: Performance of pre-optimization done (n=214): time 5.811e-06/7.351, allocations: 0 / 2.217 GB, free: 32.33 MB / 0.8698 GB
Notification: Performance of matching and sorting (n=222): time 0.03871/7.39, allocations: 11.18 MB / 2.228 GB, free: 21.05 MB / 0.8698 GB
Notification: Performance of inlineWhenForInitialization (initialization): time 7.385e-05/7.39, allocations: 132.8 kB / 2.228 GB, free: 20.89 MB / 0.8698 GB
Notification: Performance of selectInitializationVariablesDAE (initialization): time 0.03155/7.421, allocations: 10.59 MB / 2.238 GB, free: 10.3 MB / 0.8698 GB
Notification: Performance of collectPreVariables (initialization): time 0.00146/7.423, allocations: 125.7 kB / 2.238 GB, free: 10.17 MB / 0.8698 GB
Notification: Performance of collectInitialEqns (initialization): time 0.007585/7.431, allocations: 3.199 MB / 2.242 GB, free: 6.945 MB / 0.8698 GB
Notification: Performance of collectInitialBindings (initialization): time 0.002829/7.433, allocations: 0.8322 MB / 2.242 GB, free: 6.102 MB / 0.8698 GB
Notification: Performance of simplifyInitialFunctions (initialization): time 0.001096/7.435, allocations: 103.9 kB / 2.242 GB, free: 6 MB / 0.8698 GB
Notification: Performance of setup shared object (initialization): time 0.000848/7.435, allocations: 0.5282 MB / 2.243 GB, free: 5.465 MB / 0.8698 GB
Notification: Performance of preBalanceInitialSystem (initialization): time 0.008098/7.444, allocations: 2.996 MB / 2.246 GB, free: 2.461 MB / 0.8698 GB
Notification: Performance of partitionIndependentBlocks (initialization): time 0.01096/7.455, allocations: 5.452 MB / 2.251 GB, free: 11.81 MB / 0.8855 GB
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[2] = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2]) = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2]))
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[2] = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2]) = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2]))
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[2] = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2]) = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2]))
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[2] = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2]) = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2]))
Notification: Performance of analyzeInitialSystem (initialization): time 0.7494/8.204, allocations: 25.76 MB / 2.276 GB, free: 156 MB / 0.8855 GB
Notification: Performance of solveInitialSystemEqSystem (initialization): time 8.578e-05/8.204, allocations: 23.72 kB / 2.276 GB, free: 156 MB / 0.8855 GB
Error: Internal error IndexReduction.pantelidesIndexReduction failed! System is structurally singulare and cannot handled because number of unassigned equations is larger than number of states. Use -d=bltdump to get more information.
Error: No system for the symbolic initialization was generated