Running: ./testmodel.py --libraries=/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/ --ompython_omhome=/usr Buildings_9_Buildings.Fluid.Examples.FlowSystem.Basic.conf.json loadFile("/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Buildings 9.1.1-maint.9.1.x/package.mo", uses=false) loadFile("/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Complex 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo", uses=false) loadFile("/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Modelica 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo", uses=false) loadFile("/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/ModelicaServices 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo", uses=false) Using package ModelicaServices with version 4.0.0 (/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/ModelicaServices 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo) Using package Modelica with version 4.0.0 (/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Modelica 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo) Using package Complex with version 4.0.0 (/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Complex 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo) Using package Buildings with version 9.1.1 (/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Buildings 9.1.1-maint.9.1.x/package.mo) Running command: "" <> buildModelFMU(Buildings.Fluid.Examples.FlowSystem.Basic,fileNamePrefix="Buildings_9_Buildings_Fluid_Examples_FlowSystem_Basic",fmuType="me",version="2.0",platforms={"static"}) "" <> buildModelFMU(Buildings.Fluid.Examples.FlowSystem.Basic,fileNamePrefix="Buildings_9_Buildings_Fluid_Examples_FlowSystem_Basic",fmuType="me",version="2.0",platforms={"static"}) Notification: Performance of loadFile(/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Buildings 9.1.1-maint.9.1.x/package.mo): time 2.275/2.275, allocations: 387.1 MB / 399.7 MB, free: 9.469 MB / 314.7 MB Notification: Performance of loadFile(/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Complex 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo): time 0.0009914/0.0009916, allocations: 176.9 kB / 492.3 MB, free: 0.6289 MB / 394.7 MB Notification: Performance of loadFile(/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Modelica 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo): time 1.448/1.448, allocations: 221.3 MB / 0.7872 GB, free: 13 MB / 0.5573 GB Notification: Performance of loadFile(/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/ModelicaServices 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo): time 0.0009531/0.0009531, allocations: 89.8 kB / 0.9267 GB, free: 14.08 MB / 0.698 GB Notification: Performance of FrontEnd - loaded program: time 3.305e-05/3.319e-05, allocations: 4 kB / 1.073 GB, free: 180.4 MB / 0.7605 GB Notification: Performance of FrontEnd - Absyn->SCode: time 0.2522/0.2523, allocations: 142.3 MB / 1.212 GB, free: 38.49 MB / 0.7605 GB Notification: Performance of FrontEnd - scodeFlatten: time 1.21/1.462, allocations: 462.1 MB / 1.664 GB, free: 0.8984 MB / 1.073 GB Notification: Performance of FrontEnd - mkProgramGraph: time 0.0002576/1.462, allocations: 88.64 kB / 1.664 GB, free: 0.8555 MB / 1.073 GB Notification: Performance of FrontEnd - DAE generated: time 26.66/28.12, allocations: 6.483 GB / 8.147 GB, free: 120.3 MB / 1.417 GB Notification: Performance of FrontEnd: time 1.974e-06/28.12, allocations: 0 / 8.147 GB, free: 120.3 MB / 1.417 GB Notification: Performance of Transformations before backend: time 0.003831/28.12, allocations: 447.2 kB / 8.147 GB, free: 120.2 MB / 1.417 GB Notification: Model statistics after passing the front-end and creating the data structures used by the back-end: * Number of equations: 2029 * Number of variables: 2029 Notification: Performance of Generate backend data structure: time 0.05662/28.18, allocations: 13.51 MB / 8.16 GB, free: 114.4 MB / 1.417 GB Notification: Performance of prepare preOptimizeDAE: time 5.174e-05/28.18, allocations: 9.219 kB / 8.16 GB, free: 114.4 MB / 1.417 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt introduceOutputAliases (simulation): time 0.006186/28.18, allocations: 1.041 MB / 8.161 GB, free: 114.3 MB / 1.417 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt normalInlineFunction (simulation): time 0.01843/28.2, allocations: 2.548 MB / 8.164 GB, free: 113.4 MB / 1.417 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt evaluateParameters (simulation): time 0.07393/28.28, allocations: 21.76 MB / 8.185 GB, free: 110.9 MB / 1.417 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt simplifyIfEquations (simulation): time 0.001377/28.28, allocations: 0.6865 MB / 8.186 GB, free: 110.9 MB / 1.417 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt expandDerOperator (simulation): time 0.006287/28.29, allocations: 0.9698 MB / 8.187 GB, free: 110.9 MB / 1.417 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt clockPartitioning (simulation): time 0.04819/28.33, allocations: 15.73 MB / 8.202 GB, free: 110.1 MB / 1.417 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt findStateOrder (simulation): time 0.0005567/28.33, allocations: 19.58 kB / 8.202 GB, free: 110.1 MB / 1.417 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt replaceEdgeChange (simulation): time 0.004359/28.34, allocations: 331.9 kB / 8.202 GB, free: 110.1 MB / 1.417 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt inlineArrayEqn (simulation): time 0.0004194/28.34, allocations: 364.8 kB / 8.203 GB, free: 110.1 MB / 1.417 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt removeEqualRHS (simulation): time 0.03823/28.38, allocations: 19.79 MB / 8.222 GB, free: 110 MB / 1.417 GB Warning: The model contains alias variables with conflicting start and/or nominal values. It is recommended to resolve the conflicts, because otherwise the system could be hard to solve. To print the conflicting alias sets and the chosen candidates please use -d=aliasConflicts. Notification: Performance of preOpt removeSimpleEquations (simulation): time 0.1556/28.53, allocations: 78.91 MB / 8.299 GB, free: 77.82 MB / 1.417 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt comSubExp (simulation): time 0.02228/28.56, allocations: 12.59 MB / 8.311 GB, free: 77.33 MB / 1.417 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt resolveLoops (simulation): time 0.01595/28.57, allocations: 9.651 MB / 8.321 GB, free: 77.22 MB / 1.417 GB Warning: The model contains alias variables with conflicting start and/or nominal values. It is recommended to resolve the conflicts, because otherwise the system could be hard to solve. To print the conflicting alias sets and the chosen candidates please use -d=aliasConflicts. Notification: Performance of preOpt evalFunc (simulation): time 0.08481/28.66, allocations: 34.59 MB / 8.355 GB, free: 68.52 MB / 1.417 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt encapsulateWhenConditions (simulation): time 0.02049/28.68, allocations: 9.53 MB / 8.364 GB, free: 65.48 MB / 1.417 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt simplifyInStream (simulation): time 0.04806/28.72, allocations: 15.09 MB / 8.379 GB, free: 63.97 MB / 1.417 GB Notification: Performance of pre-optimization done (n=638): time 6.754e-05/28.72, allocations: 0.5625 kB / 8.379 GB, free: 63.97 MB / 1.417 GB Notification: Performance of matching and sorting (n=956): time 2.139/30.86, allocations: 269.2 MB / 8.641 GB, free: 138.7 MB / 1.432 GB Warning: The linear system: 1 : valSouth.res3.m_flow + valNorth.res3.m_flow + spl1.res1.m_flow + valCoo.m_flow + (-valNorth2[1].m_flow) - valNorth2[2].m_flow - valNorth2[3].m_flow - valNorth2[4].m_flow - valNorth2[5].m_flow - valNorth2[6].m_flow - valNorth2[7].m_flow - valNorth2[8].m_flow - valNorth1[1].m_flow - valNorth1[2].m_flow - valNorth1[3].m_flow - valNorth1[4].m_flow - valSouth2[1].m_flow - valSouth2[2].m_flow - valSouth2[3].m_flow - valSouth2[4].m_flow - valSouth2[5].m_flow - valSouth2[6].m_flow - valSouth2[7].m_flow - valSouth2[8].m_flow - valSouth1[1].m_flow - valSouth1[2].m_flow - valSouth1[4].m_flow - valSouth1[3].m_flow = 0.0 2 : valSouth1[4].m_flow + valSouth1[3].m_flow + valSouth1[2].m_flow + valSouth1[1].m_flow - pipSouth1.m_flow = 0.0 [ -1.0 , -1.0 ; 1.0 , 1.0 ] * [ valSouth1[2].m_flow ; valSouth1[1].m_flow ] = [ valNorth2[1].m_flow + valSouth1[4].m_flow + valSouth1[3].m_flow + valSouth2[8].m_flow + valSouth2[7].m_flow + valSouth2[6].m_flow + valSouth2[5].m_flow + valSouth2[4].m_flow + valSouth2[3].m_flow + valSouth2[2].m_flow + valSouth2[1].m_flow + valNorth1[4].m_flow + valNorth1[3].m_flow + valNorth1[2].m_flow + valNorth1[1].m_flow + valNorth2[8].m_flow + valNorth2[7].m_flow + valNorth2[6].m_flow + valNorth2[5].m_flow + valNorth2[4].m_flow + valNorth2[3].m_flow + valNorth2[2].m_flow + (-valNorth.res3.m_flow) - valSouth.res3.m_flow - spl1.res1.m_flow - valCoo.m_flow ; pipSouth1.m_flow + (-valSouth1[3].m_flow) - valSouth1[4].m_flow ] might be structurally or numerically singular for variable valSouth1[1].m_flow since U(2,2) = 0.0. It might be hard to solve. Compilation continues anyway. Warning: The linear system: 1 : valSouth.res3.m_flow + valNorth.res3.m_flow + spl1.res1.m_flow + valCoo.m_flow + (-valNorth2[1].m_flow) - valNorth2[2].m_flow - valNorth2[3].m_flow - valNorth2[4].m_flow - valNorth2[5].m_flow - valNorth2[6].m_flow - valNorth2[7].m_flow - valNorth2[8].m_flow - valNorth1[1].m_flow - valNorth1[2].m_flow - valNorth1[3].m_flow - valNorth1[4].m_flow - valSouth2[1].m_flow - valSouth2[2].m_flow - valSouth2[3].m_flow - valSouth2[4].m_flow - valSouth2[5].m_flow - valSouth2[6].m_flow - valSouth2[7].m_flow - valSouth2[8].m_flow - valSouth1[1].m_flow - valSouth1[2].m_flow - valSouth1[4].m_flow - valSouth1[3].m_flow = 0.0 2 : valSouth1[4].m_flow + valSouth1[3].m_flow + valSouth1[2].m_flow + valSouth1[1].m_flow - pipSouth1.m_flow = 0.0 [ -1.0 , -1.0 ; 1.0 , 1.0 ] * [ valSouth1[1].m_flow ; valSouth1[2].m_flow ] = [ valNorth2[1].m_flow + valSouth1[4].m_flow + valSouth1[3].m_flow + valSouth2[8].m_flow + valSouth2[7].m_flow + valSouth2[6].m_flow + valSouth2[5].m_flow + valSouth2[4].m_flow + valSouth2[3].m_flow + valSouth2[2].m_flow + valSouth2[1].m_flow + valNorth1[4].m_flow + valNorth1[3].m_flow + valNorth1[2].m_flow + valNorth1[1].m_flow + valNorth2[8].m_flow + valNorth2[7].m_flow + valNorth2[6].m_flow + valNorth2[5].m_flow + valNorth2[4].m_flow + valNorth2[3].m_flow + valNorth2[2].m_flow + (-valNorth.res3.m_flow) - valSouth.res3.m_flow - spl1.res1.m_flow - valCoo.m_flow ; pipSouth1.m_flow + (-valSouth1[3].m_flow) - valSouth1[4].m_flow ] might be structurally or numerically singular for variable valSouth1[2].m_flow since U(2,2) = 0.0. It might be hard to solve. Compilation continues anyway. Warning: The linear system: 1 : valSouth.res3.m_flow.$pDERStateSetJac0.dummyVarStateSetJac0 + valNorth.res3.m_flow.$pDERStateSetJac0.dummyVarStateSetJac0 + spl1.res1.m_flow.$pDERStateSetJac0.dummyVarStateSetJac0 + valCoo.m_flow.$pDERStateSetJac0.dummyVarStateSetJac0 + (-valSouth1[4].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac0) - valSouth1[3].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac0 - valSouth1.2.m_flow.$pDERStateSetJac0.dummyVarStateSetJac0 - valSouth1.1.m_flow.$pDERStateSetJac0.dummyVarStateSetJac0 - valSouth2[8].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac0 - valSouth2[7].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac0 - valSouth2[6].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac0 - valSouth2[5].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac0 - valSouth2[4].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac0 - valSouth2[3].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac0 - valSouth2[2].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac0 - valSouth2[1].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac0 - valNorth1[4].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac0 - valNorth1[3].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac0 - valNorth1[2].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac0 - valNorth1.1.m_flow.$pDERStateSetJac0.dummyVarStateSetJac0 - valNorth2[8].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac0 - valNorth2[7].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac0 - valNorth2[6].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac0 - valNorth2[5].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac0 - valNorth2[4].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac0 - valNorth2[3].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac0 - valNorth2[2].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac0 - valNorth2[1].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac0 = 0.0 2 : valSouth1[4].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac0 + valSouth1[3].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac0 + valSouth1.2.m_flow.$pDERStateSetJac0.dummyVarStateSetJac0 + valSouth1.1.m_flow.$pDERStateSetJac0.dummyVarStateSetJac0 - pipSouth1.m_flow.$pDERStateSetJac0.dummyVarStateSetJac0 = 0.0 [ -1.0 , -1.0 ; 1.0 , 1.0 ] * [ valSouth1.2.m_flow.$pDERStateSetJac0.dummyVarStateSetJac0 ; valSouth1.1.m_flow.$pDERStateSetJac0.dummyVarStateSetJac0 ] = [ valSouth1[4].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac0 + valNorth2[2].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac0 + valNorth2[1].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac0 + valNorth2[3].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac0 + valNorth2[4].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac0 + valNorth2[5].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac0 + valNorth2[6].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac0 + valNorth2[7].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac0 + valNorth2[8].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac0 + valNorth1.1.m_flow.$pDERStateSetJac0.dummyVarStateSetJac0 + valNorth1[2].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac0 + valNorth1[3].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac0 + valNorth1[4].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac0 + valSouth2[1].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac0 + valSouth2[2].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac0 + valSouth2[3].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac0 + valSouth2[4].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac0 + valSouth2[5].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac0 + valSouth2[6].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac0 + valSouth2[7].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac0 + valSouth2[8].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac0 + valSouth1[3].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac0 + (-valNorth.res3.m_flow.$pDERStateSetJac0.dummyVarStateSetJac0) - valSouth.res3.m_flow.$pDERStateSetJac0.dummyVarStateSetJac0 - spl1.res1.m_flow.$pDERStateSetJac0.dummyVarStateSetJac0 - valCoo.m_flow.$pDERStateSetJac0.dummyVarStateSetJac0 ; pipSouth1.m_flow.$pDERStateSetJac0.dummyVarStateSetJac0 + (-valSouth1[3].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac0) - valSouth1[4].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac0 ] might be structurally or numerically singular for variable valSouth1.1.m_flow.$pDERStateSetJac0.dummyVarStateSetJac0 since U(2,2) = 0.0. It might be hard to solve. Compilation continues anyway. Warning: The linear system: 1 : valSouth.res3.m_flow.$pDERStateSetJac0.dummyVarStateSetJac0 + valNorth.res3.m_flow.$pDERStateSetJac0.dummyVarStateSetJac0 + spl1.res1.m_flow.$pDERStateSetJac0.dummyVarStateSetJac0 + valCoo.m_flow.$pDERStateSetJac0.dummyVarStateSetJac0 + (-valSouth1[4].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac0) - valSouth1[3].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac0 - valSouth1.2.m_flow.$pDERStateSetJac0.dummyVarStateSetJac0 - valSouth1.1.m_flow.$pDERStateSetJac0.dummyVarStateSetJac0 - valSouth2[8].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac0 - valSouth2[7].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac0 - valSouth2[6].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac0 - valSouth2[5].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac0 - valSouth2[4].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac0 - valSouth2[3].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac0 - valSouth2[2].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac0 - valSouth2[1].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac0 - valNorth1[4].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac0 - valNorth1[3].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac0 - valNorth1[2].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac0 - valNorth1.1.m_flow.$pDERStateSetJac0.dummyVarStateSetJac0 - valNorth2[8].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac0 - valNorth2[7].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac0 - valNorth2[6].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac0 - valNorth2[5].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac0 - valNorth2[4].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac0 - valNorth2[3].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac0 - valNorth2[2].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac0 - valNorth2[1].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac0 = 0.0 2 : valSouth1[4].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac0 + valSouth1[3].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac0 + valSouth1.2.m_flow.$pDERStateSetJac0.dummyVarStateSetJac0 + valSouth1.1.m_flow.$pDERStateSetJac0.dummyVarStateSetJac0 - pipSouth1.m_flow.$pDERStateSetJac0.dummyVarStateSetJac0 = 0.0 [ -1.0 , -1.0 ; 1.0 , 1.0 ] * [ valSouth1.1.m_flow.$pDERStateSetJac0.dummyVarStateSetJac0 ; valSouth1.2.m_flow.$pDERStateSetJac0.dummyVarStateSetJac0 ] = [ valSouth1[4].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac0 + valNorth2[2].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac0 + valNorth2[1].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac0 + valNorth2[3].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac0 + valNorth2[4].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac0 + valNorth2[5].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac0 + valNorth2[6].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac0 + valNorth2[7].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac0 + valNorth2[8].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac0 + valNorth1.1.m_flow.$pDERStateSetJac0.dummyVarStateSetJac0 + valNorth1[2].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac0 + valNorth1[3].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac0 + valNorth1[4].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac0 + valSouth2[1].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac0 + valSouth2[2].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac0 + valSouth2[3].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac0 + valSouth2[4].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac0 + valSouth2[5].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac0 + valSouth2[6].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac0 + valSouth2[7].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac0 + valSouth2[8].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac0 + valSouth1[3].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac0 + (-valNorth.res3.m_flow.$pDERStateSetJac0.dummyVarStateSetJac0) - valSouth.res3.m_flow.$pDERStateSetJac0.dummyVarStateSetJac0 - spl1.res1.m_flow.$pDERStateSetJac0.dummyVarStateSetJac0 - valCoo.m_flow.$pDERStateSetJac0.dummyVarStateSetJac0 ; pipSouth1.m_flow.$pDERStateSetJac0.dummyVarStateSetJac0 + (-valSouth1[3].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac0) - valSouth1[4].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac0 ] might be structurally or numerically singular for variable valSouth1.2.m_flow.$pDERStateSetJac0.dummyVarStateSetJac0 since U(2,2) = 0.0. It might be hard to solve. Compilation continues anyway. Notification: Performance of inlineWhenForInitialization (initialization): time 0.1176/30.98, allocations: 50.67 MB / 8.691 GB, free: 126 MB / 1.432 GB Notification: Performance of selectInitializationVariablesDAE (initialization): time 0.03871/31.02, allocations: 14.18 MB / 8.705 GB, free: 125.2 MB / 1.432 GB Notification: Performance of collectPreVariables (initialization): time 0.005299/31.02, allocations: 254 kB / 8.705 GB, free: 125.2 MB / 1.432 GB Notification: Performance of collectInitialEqns (initialization): time 0.01201/31.04, allocations: 7.234 MB / 8.712 GB, free: 124 MB / 1.432 GB Notification: Performance of collectInitialBindings (initialization): time 0.01332/31.05, allocations: 3.429 MB / 8.715 GB, free: 122.3 MB / 1.432 GB Notification: Performance of simplifyInitialFunctions (initialization): time 0.005757/31.06, allocations: 212.5 kB / 8.716 GB, free: 122.3 MB / 1.432 GB Notification: Performance of setup shared object (initialization): time 0.001272/31.06, allocations: 0.7535 MB / 8.716 GB, free: 122 MB / 1.432 GB Notification: Performance of preBalanceInitialSystem (initialization): time 0.03457/31.09, allocations: 22.22 MB / 8.738 GB, free: 122 MB / 1.432 GB Notification: Performance of partitionIndependentBlocks (initialization): time 0.03915/31.13, allocations: 25.28 MB / 8.763 GB, free: 118.7 MB / 1.432 GB Notification: Performance of analyzeInitialSystem (initialization): time 0.03856/31.17, allocations: 23.62 MB / 8.786 GB, free: 118.4 MB / 1.432 GB Notification: Performance of solveInitialSystemEqSystem (initialization): time 0.0001992/31.17, allocations: 18.22 kB / 8.786 GB, free: 118.4 MB / 1.432 GB Notification: Performance of matching and sorting (n=1448) (initialization): time 0.6582/31.83, allocations: 155.5 MB / 8.938 GB, free: 81.02 MB / 1.432 GB Notification: Performance of prepare postOptimizeDAE: time 0.007697/31.84, allocations: 32.05 MB / 8.969 GB, free: 47.3 MB / 1.432 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyComplexFunction (initialization): time 0.0001935/31.84, allocations: 44 kB / 8.969 GB, free: 47.26 MB / 1.432 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt tearingSystem (initialization): time 1.972/33.81, allocations: 152.4 MB / 9.118 GB, free: 175.1 MB / 1.479 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt solveSimpleEquations (initialization): time 0.02131/33.83, allocations: 3.687 MB / 9.121 GB, free: 175.1 MB / 1.479 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt calculateStrongComponentJacobians (initialization): time 0.1709/34, allocations: 75.87 MB / 9.196 GB, free: 168 MB / 1.479 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyAllExpressions (initialization): time 0.2157/34.22, allocations: 11.12 MB / 9.206 GB, free: 167.8 MB / 1.479 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt collapseArrayExpressions (initialization): time 0.00909/34.23, allocations: 1.677 MB / 9.208 GB, free: 167.8 MB / 1.479 GB Notification: Performance of prepare postOptimizeDAE: time 1.712e-05/34.23, allocations: 3.688 kB / 9.208 GB, free: 167.8 MB / 1.479 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt replaceHomotopyWithSimplified (initialization): time 0.648/34.87, allocations: 154.1 MB / 9.358 GB, free: 164.7 MB / 1.479 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyComplexFunction (initialization): time 0.0002794/34.87, allocations: 46.47 kB / 9.359 GB, free: 164.7 MB / 1.479 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt tearingSystem (initialization): time 0.6624/35.54, allocations: 152.6 MB / 9.508 GB, free: 78.96 MB / 1.479 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt solveSimpleEquations (initialization): time 0.01924/35.56, allocations: 3.661 MB / 9.511 GB, free: 75.47 MB / 1.479 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt calculateStrongComponentJacobians (initialization): time 0.1685/35.72, allocations: 82.51 MB / 9.592 GB, free: 15.27 MB / 1.479 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyAllExpressions (initialization): time 0.2119/35.94, allocations: 11.09 MB / 9.603 GB, free: 4.418 MB / 1.479 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt collapseArrayExpressions (initialization): time 0.008783/35.94, allocations: 1.629 MB / 9.604 GB, free: 2.871 MB / 1.479 GB Notification: Model statistics after passing the back-end for initialization: * Number of independent subsystems: 207 * Number of states: 0 () * Number of discrete variables: 10 ($whenCondition1,$whenCondition2,booleanToInteger.u,booleanToInteger.y,$PRE.stepPump.pulseStart,stepPump.pulseStart,$PRE.stepValve.T_start,stepValve.T_start,$PRE.stepValve.count,stepValve.count) * Number of discrete states: 0 () * Top-level inputs: 0 Notification: Strong component statistics for initialization (992): * Single equations (assignments): 974 * Array equations: 6 * Algorithm blocks: 1 * Record equations: 0 * When equations: 0 * If-equations: 0 * Equation systems (linear and non-linear blocks): 8 * Torn equation systems: 3 * Mixed (continuous/discrete) equation systems: 0 Notification: Equation system details: * Constant Jacobian: 0 * Linear Jacobian (size,density): 0 * Non-linear Jacobian: 8 {1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1} * Without analytic Jacobian: 0 Notification: Torn system details for strict tearing set: * Linear torn systems: 1 {(28,89.3%) 28} * Non-linear torn systems: 2 {33 119,33 119} Notification: Performance of prepare postOptimizeDAE: time 0.01224/35.96, allocations: 0.6754 MB / 9.605 GB, free: 2.633 MB / 1.479 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt lateInlineFunction (simulation): time 0.0105/35.97, allocations: 1.501 MB / 9.606 GB, free: 1.469 MB / 1.479 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt wrapFunctionCalls (simulation): time 1.568/37.54, allocations: 67.49 MB / 9.672 GB, free: 187.9 MB / 1.495 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt inlineArrayEqn (simulation): time 0.2579/37.79, allocations: 81.55 MB / 9.752 GB, free: 187.3 MB / 1.495 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt constantLinearSystem (simulation): time 0.0001952/37.79, allocations: 31.09 kB / 9.752 GB, free: 187.3 MB / 1.495 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifysemiLinear (simulation): time 0.24/38.03, allocations: 80.43 MB / 9.83 GB, free: 186.5 MB / 1.495 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt removeSimpleEquations (simulation): time 0.4039/38.44, allocations: 206.3 MB / 10.03 GB, free: 149.4 MB / 1.495 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyComplexFunction (simulation): time 0.0001442/38.44, allocations: 4 kB / 10.03 GB, free: 149.4 MB / 1.495 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt solveSimpleEquations (simulation): time 0.01442/38.45, allocations: 2.222 MB / 10.03 GB, free: 148.1 MB / 1.495 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt tearingSystem (simulation): time 1.909/40.36, allocations: 146.8 MB / 10.18 GB, free: 179.6 MB / 1.495 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt inputDerivativesUsed (simulation): time 0.004678/40.37, allocations: 0.8207 MB / 10.18 GB, free: 179.6 MB / 1.495 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt calculateStrongComponentJacobians (simulation): time 0.2248/40.59, allocations: 114.3 MB / 10.29 GB, free: 164.8 MB / 1.495 GB Warning: The linear system: 1 : tabsSouth2[2].dp = tabsSouth2[2].port_a.p - tabsSouth2[8].port_b.p 2 : valSouth2[2].dp = valSouth2[7].port_a.p - tabsSouth2[2].port_a.p 3 : valSouth2[1].dp = valSouth2[7].port_a.p - tabsSouth2[1].port_a.p 4 : tabsSouth2[1].dp = tabsSouth2[1].port_a.p - tabsSouth2[8].port_b.p [ 1.0 , 0.0 , 0.0 , -1.0 ; 0.0 , 0.0 , -1.0 , 1.0 ; 0.0 , 1.0 , -1.0 , 0.0 ; 1.0 , -1.0 , 0.0 , 0.0 ] * [ tabsSouth2[8].port_b.p ; tabsSouth2[1].port_a.p ; valSouth2[7].port_a.p ; tabsSouth2[2].port_a.p ] = [ -tabsSouth2[2].dp ; -valSouth2[2].dp ; -valSouth2[1].dp ; -tabsSouth2[1].dp ] might be structurally or numerically singular for variable tabsSouth2[2].port_a.p since U(4,4) = 0.0. It might be hard to solve. Compilation continues anyway. Warning: The linear system: 1 : valSouth1[4].m_flow + valSouth1[3].m_flow + valSouth1[2].m_flow + valSouth1[1].m_flow - pipSouth1.m_flow = 0.0 2 : valSouth.res3.m_flow + valNorth.res3.m_flow + spl1.res1.m_flow + (-valSouth1[3].m_flow) - $cse387 - valSouth1[4].m_flow - valSouth1[2].m_flow - valSouth1[1].m_flow - valSouth2[8].m_flow - valSouth2[7].m_flow - valSouth2[6].m_flow - valSouth2[5].m_flow - valSouth2[4].m_flow - valSouth2[3].m_flow - valSouth2[2].m_flow - valSouth2[1].m_flow - valNorth1[4].m_flow - valNorth1[3].m_flow - valNorth1[2].m_flow - valNorth1[1].m_flow - valNorth2[8].m_flow - valNorth2[7].m_flow - valNorth2[6].m_flow - valNorth2[5].m_flow - valNorth2[4].m_flow - valNorth2[3].m_flow - valNorth2[2].m_flow - valNorth2[1].m_flow = 0.0 [ 1.0 , 1.0 ; -1.0 , -1.0 ] * [ valSouth1[2].m_flow ; valSouth1[1].m_flow ] = [ pipSouth1.m_flow + (-valSouth1[3].m_flow) - valSouth1[4].m_flow ; valSouth1[3].m_flow + valNorth2[2].m_flow + valNorth2[1].m_flow + valNorth2[3].m_flow + valNorth2[4].m_flow + valNorth2[5].m_flow + valNorth2[6].m_flow + valNorth2[7].m_flow + valNorth2[8].m_flow + valNorth1[1].m_flow + valNorth1[2].m_flow + valNorth1[3].m_flow + valNorth1[4].m_flow + valSouth2[1].m_flow + valSouth2[2].m_flow + valSouth2[3].m_flow + valSouth2[4].m_flow + valSouth2[5].m_flow + valSouth2[6].m_flow + valSouth2[7].m_flow + valSouth2[8].m_flow + valSouth1[4].m_flow + $cse387 + (-valNorth.res3.m_flow) - valSouth.res3.m_flow - spl1.res1.m_flow ] might be structurally or numerically singular for variable valSouth1[1].m_flow since U(2,2) = 0.0. It might be hard to solve. Compilation continues anyway. Warning: The linear system: 1 : tabsSouth2[2].dp = tabsSouth2[2].port_a.p - tabsSouth2[8].port_b.p 2 : tabsSouth2[1].dp = tabsSouth2[1].port_a.p - tabsSouth2[8].port_b.p 3 : valSouth2[1].dp = valSouth2[7].port_a.p - tabsSouth2[1].port_a.p 4 : valSouth2[2].dp = valSouth2[7].port_a.p - tabsSouth2[2].port_a.p [ -1.0 , 0.0 , 0.0 , 1.0 ; 0.0 , 0.0 , -1.0 , 1.0 ; 0.0 , -1.0 , 1.0 , 0.0 ; 1.0 , -1.0 , 0.0 , 0.0 ] * [ tabsSouth2[2].port_a.p ; valSouth2[7].port_a.p ; tabsSouth2[1].port_a.p ; tabsSouth2[8].port_b.p ] = [ -tabsSouth2[2].dp ; -tabsSouth2[1].dp ; -valSouth2[1].dp ; -valSouth2[2].dp ] might be structurally or numerically singular for variable tabsSouth2[8].port_b.p since U(4,4) = 0.0. It might be hard to solve. Compilation continues anyway. Warning: The linear system: 1 : valSouth.res3.m_flow + valNorth.res3.m_flow + spl1.res1.m_flow + (-valSouth1[3].m_flow) - $cse387 - valSouth1[4].m_flow - valSouth1[2].m_flow - valSouth1[1].m_flow - valSouth2[8].m_flow - valSouth2[7].m_flow - valSouth2[6].m_flow - valSouth2[5].m_flow - valSouth2[4].m_flow - valSouth2[3].m_flow - valSouth2[2].m_flow - valSouth2[1].m_flow - valNorth1[4].m_flow - valNorth1[3].m_flow - valNorth1[2].m_flow - valNorth1[1].m_flow - valNorth2[8].m_flow - valNorth2[7].m_flow - valNorth2[6].m_flow - valNorth2[5].m_flow - valNorth2[4].m_flow - valNorth2[3].m_flow - valNorth2[2].m_flow - valNorth2[1].m_flow = 0.0 2 : valSouth1[4].m_flow + valSouth1[3].m_flow + valSouth1[2].m_flow + valSouth1[1].m_flow - pipSouth1.m_flow = 0.0 [ -1.0 , -1.0 ; 1.0 , 1.0 ] * [ valSouth1[1].m_flow ; valSouth1[2].m_flow ] = [ valSouth1[3].m_flow + valNorth2[2].m_flow + valNorth2[1].m_flow + valNorth2[3].m_flow + valNorth2[4].m_flow + valNorth2[5].m_flow + valNorth2[6].m_flow + valNorth2[7].m_flow + valNorth2[8].m_flow + valNorth1[1].m_flow + valNorth1[2].m_flow + valNorth1[3].m_flow + valNorth1[4].m_flow + valSouth2[1].m_flow + valSouth2[2].m_flow + valSouth2[3].m_flow + valSouth2[4].m_flow + valSouth2[5].m_flow + valSouth2[6].m_flow + valSouth2[7].m_flow + valSouth2[8].m_flow + valSouth1[4].m_flow + $cse387 + (-valNorth.res3.m_flow) - valSouth.res3.m_flow - spl1.res1.m_flow ; pipSouth1.m_flow + (-valSouth1[3].m_flow) - valSouth1[4].m_flow ] might be structurally or numerically singular for variable valSouth1[2].m_flow since U(2,2) = 0.0. It might be hard to solve. Compilation continues anyway. Warning: The linear system: 1 : tabsSouth2.2.dp.$pDERStateSetJac29.dummyVarStateSetJac29 = tabsSouth2.2.port_a.p.$pDERStateSetJac29.dummyVarStateSetJac29 - tabsSouth2.8.port_b.p.$pDERStateSetJac29.dummyVarStateSetJac29 2 : valSouth2.2.dp.$pDERStateSetJac29.dummyVarStateSetJac29 = valSouth2.7.port_a.p.$pDERStateSetJac29.dummyVarStateSetJac29 - tabsSouth2.2.port_a.p.$pDERStateSetJac29.dummyVarStateSetJac29 3 : valSouth2.1.dp.$pDERStateSetJac29.dummyVarStateSetJac29 = valSouth2.7.port_a.p.$pDERStateSetJac29.dummyVarStateSetJac29 - tabsSouth2.1.port_a.p.$pDERStateSetJac29.dummyVarStateSetJac29 4 : tabsSouth2.1.dp.$pDERStateSetJac29.dummyVarStateSetJac29 = tabsSouth2.1.port_a.p.$pDERStateSetJac29.dummyVarStateSetJac29 - tabsSouth2.8.port_b.p.$pDERStateSetJac29.dummyVarStateSetJac29 [ 1.0 , 0.0 , 0.0 , -1.0 ; 0.0 , 0.0 , -1.0 , 1.0 ; 0.0 , 1.0 , -1.0 , 0.0 ; 1.0 , -1.0 , 0.0 , 0.0 ] * [ tabsSouth2.8.port_b.p.$pDERStateSetJac29.dummyVarStateSetJac29 ; tabsSouth2.1.port_a.p.$pDERStateSetJac29.dummyVarStateSetJac29 ; valSouth2.7.port_a.p.$pDERStateSetJac29.dummyVarStateSetJac29 ; tabsSouth2.2.port_a.p.$pDERStateSetJac29.dummyVarStateSetJac29 ] = [ -tabsSouth2.2.dp.$pDERStateSetJac29.dummyVarStateSetJac29 ; -valSouth2.2.dp.$pDERStateSetJac29.dummyVarStateSetJac29 ; -valSouth2.1.dp.$pDERStateSetJac29.dummyVarStateSetJac29 ; -tabsSouth2.1.dp.$pDERStateSetJac29.dummyVarStateSetJac29 ] might be structurally or numerically singular for variable tabsSouth2.2.port_a.p.$pDERStateSetJac29.dummyVarStateSetJac29 since U(4,4) = 0.0. It might be hard to solve. Compilation continues anyway. Warning: The linear system: 1 : valSouth1[4].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac29 + valSouth1[3].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac29 + valSouth1.2.m_flow.$pDERStateSetJac29.dummyVarStateSetJac29 + valSouth1.1.m_flow.$pDERStateSetJac29.dummyVarStateSetJac29 - pipSouth1.m_flow.$pDERStateSetJac29.dummyVarStateSetJac29 = 0.0 2 : valSouth.res3.m_flow.$pDERStateSetJac29.dummyVarStateSetJac29 + valNorth.res3.m_flow.$pDERStateSetJac29.dummyVarStateSetJac29 + spl1.res1.m_flow.$pDERStateSetJac29.dummyVarStateSetJac29 + (-valNorth2[2].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac29) - valNorth2[1].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac29 - valNorth2[3].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac29 - valNorth2[4].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac29 - valNorth2[5].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac29 - valNorth2[6].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac29 - valNorth2[7].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac29 - valNorth2[8].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac29 - valNorth1.1.m_flow.$pDERStateSetJac29.dummyVarStateSetJac29 - valNorth1[2].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac29 - valNorth1[3].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac29 - valNorth1[4].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac29 - valSouth2[1].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac29 - valSouth2[2].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac29 - valSouth2[3].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac29 - valSouth2[4].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac29 - valSouth2[5].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac29 - valSouth2[6].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac29 - valSouth2[7].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac29 - valSouth2[8].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac29 - valSouth1.1.m_flow.$pDERStateSetJac29.dummyVarStateSetJac29 - valSouth1.2.m_flow.$pDERStateSetJac29.dummyVarStateSetJac29 - valSouth1[4].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac29 - $cse387.$pDERStateSetJac29.dummyVarStateSetJac29 - valSouth1[3].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac29 = 0.0 [ 1.0 , 1.0 ; -1.0 , -1.0 ] * [ valSouth1.2.m_flow.$pDERStateSetJac29.dummyVarStateSetJac29 ; valSouth1.1.m_flow.$pDERStateSetJac29.dummyVarStateSetJac29 ] = [ pipSouth1.m_flow.$pDERStateSetJac29.dummyVarStateSetJac29 + (-valSouth1[3].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac29) - valSouth1[4].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac29 ; valNorth2[2].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac29 + $cse387.$pDERStateSetJac29.dummyVarStateSetJac29 + valSouth1[3].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac29 + valSouth1[4].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac29 + valSouth2[8].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac29 + valSouth2[7].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac29 + valSouth2[6].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac29 + valSouth2[5].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac29 + valSouth2[4].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac29 + valSouth2[3].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac29 + valSouth2[2].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac29 + valSouth2[1].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac29 + valNorth1[4].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac29 + valNorth1[3].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac29 + valNorth1[2].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac29 + valNorth1.1.m_flow.$pDERStateSetJac29.dummyVarStateSetJac29 + valNorth2[8].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac29 + valNorth2[7].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac29 + valNorth2[6].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac29 + valNorth2[5].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac29 + valNorth2[4].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac29 + valNorth2[3].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac29 + valNorth2[1].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac29 + (-valNorth.res3.m_flow.$pDERStateSetJac29.dummyVarStateSetJac29) - valSouth.res3.m_flow.$pDERStateSetJac29.dummyVarStateSetJac29 - spl1.res1.m_flow.$pDERStateSetJac29.dummyVarStateSetJac29 ] might be structurally or numerically singular for variable valSouth1.1.m_flow.$pDERStateSetJac29.dummyVarStateSetJac29 since U(2,2) = 0.0. It might be hard to solve. Compilation continues anyway. Warning: The linear system: 1 : tabsSouth2.2.dp.$pDERStateSetJac29.dummyVarStateSetJac29 = tabsSouth2.2.port_a.p.$pDERStateSetJac29.dummyVarStateSetJac29 - tabsSouth2.8.port_b.p.$pDERStateSetJac29.dummyVarStateSetJac29 2 : valSouth2.2.dp.$pDERStateSetJac29.dummyVarStateSetJac29 = valSouth2.7.port_a.p.$pDERStateSetJac29.dummyVarStateSetJac29 - tabsSouth2.2.port_a.p.$pDERStateSetJac29.dummyVarStateSetJac29 3 : valSouth2.1.dp.$pDERStateSetJac29.dummyVarStateSetJac29 = valSouth2.7.port_a.p.$pDERStateSetJac29.dummyVarStateSetJac29 - tabsSouth2.1.port_a.p.$pDERStateSetJac29.dummyVarStateSetJac29 4 : tabsSouth2.1.dp.$pDERStateSetJac29.dummyVarStateSetJac29 = tabsSouth2.1.port_a.p.$pDERStateSetJac29.dummyVarStateSetJac29 - tabsSouth2.8.port_b.p.$pDERStateSetJac29.dummyVarStateSetJac29 [ 1.0 , 0.0 , 0.0 , -1.0 ; 0.0 , 0.0 , -1.0 , 1.0 ; 0.0 , 1.0 , -1.0 , 0.0 ; 1.0 , -1.0 , 0.0 , 0.0 ] * [ tabsSouth2.8.port_b.p.$pDERStateSetJac29.dummyVarStateSetJac29 ; tabsSouth2.1.port_a.p.$pDERStateSetJac29.dummyVarStateSetJac29 ; valSouth2.7.port_a.p.$pDERStateSetJac29.dummyVarStateSetJac29 ; tabsSouth2.2.port_a.p.$pDERStateSetJac29.dummyVarStateSetJac29 ] = [ -tabsSouth2.2.dp.$pDERStateSetJac29.dummyVarStateSetJac29 ; -valSouth2.2.dp.$pDERStateSetJac29.dummyVarStateSetJac29 ; -valSouth2.1.dp.$pDERStateSetJac29.dummyVarStateSetJac29 ; -tabsSouth2.1.dp.$pDERStateSetJac29.dummyVarStateSetJac29 ] might be structurally or numerically singular for variable tabsSouth2.2.port_a.p.$pDERStateSetJac29.dummyVarStateSetJac29 since U(4,4) = 0.0. It might be hard to solve. Compilation continues anyway. Warning: The linear system: 1 : valSouth1[4].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac29 + valSouth1[3].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac29 + valSouth1.2.m_flow.$pDERStateSetJac29.dummyVarStateSetJac29 + valSouth1.1.m_flow.$pDERStateSetJac29.dummyVarStateSetJac29 - pipSouth1.m_flow.$pDERStateSetJac29.dummyVarStateSetJac29 = 0.0 2 : valSouth.res3.m_flow.$pDERStateSetJac29.dummyVarStateSetJac29 + valNorth.res3.m_flow.$pDERStateSetJac29.dummyVarStateSetJac29 + spl1.res1.m_flow.$pDERStateSetJac29.dummyVarStateSetJac29 + (-valNorth2[2].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac29) - valNorth2[1].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac29 - valNorth2[3].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac29 - valNorth2[4].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac29 - valNorth2[5].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac29 - valNorth2[6].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac29 - valNorth2[7].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac29 - valNorth2[8].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac29 - valNorth1.1.m_flow.$pDERStateSetJac29.dummyVarStateSetJac29 - valNorth1[2].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac29 - valNorth1[3].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac29 - valNorth1[4].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac29 - valSouth2[1].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac29 - valSouth2[2].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac29 - valSouth2[3].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac29 - valSouth2[4].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac29 - valSouth2[5].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac29 - valSouth2[6].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac29 - valSouth2[7].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac29 - valSouth2[8].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac29 - valSouth1.1.m_flow.$pDERStateSetJac29.dummyVarStateSetJac29 - valSouth1.2.m_flow.$pDERStateSetJac29.dummyVarStateSetJac29 - valSouth1[4].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac29 - $cse387.$pDERStateSetJac29.dummyVarStateSetJac29 - valSouth1[3].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac29 = 0.0 [ 1.0 , 1.0 ; -1.0 , -1.0 ] * [ valSouth1.2.m_flow.$pDERStateSetJac29.dummyVarStateSetJac29 ; valSouth1.1.m_flow.$pDERStateSetJac29.dummyVarStateSetJac29 ] = [ pipSouth1.m_flow.$pDERStateSetJac29.dummyVarStateSetJac29 + (-valSouth1[3].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac29) - valSouth1[4].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac29 ; valNorth2[2].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac29 + $cse387.$pDERStateSetJac29.dummyVarStateSetJac29 + valSouth1[3].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac29 + valSouth1[4].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac29 + valSouth2[8].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac29 + valSouth2[7].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac29 + valSouth2[6].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac29 + valSouth2[5].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac29 + valSouth2[4].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac29 + valSouth2[3].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac29 + valSouth2[2].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac29 + valSouth2[1].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac29 + valNorth1[4].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac29 + valNorth1[3].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac29 + valNorth1[2].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac29 + valNorth1.1.m_flow.$pDERStateSetJac29.dummyVarStateSetJac29 + valNorth2[8].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac29 + valNorth2[7].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac29 + valNorth2[6].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac29 + valNorth2[5].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac29 + valNorth2[4].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac29 + valNorth2[3].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac29 + valNorth2[1].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac29 + (-valNorth.res3.m_flow.$pDERStateSetJac29.dummyVarStateSetJac29) - valSouth.res3.m_flow.$pDERStateSetJac29.dummyVarStateSetJac29 - spl1.res1.m_flow.$pDERStateSetJac29.dummyVarStateSetJac29 ] might be structurally or numerically singular for variable valSouth1.1.m_flow.$pDERStateSetJac29.dummyVarStateSetJac29 since U(2,2) = 0.0. It might be hard to solve. Compilation continues anyway. Notification: Performance of postOpt calculateStateSetsJacobians (simulation): time 0.1109/40.7, allocations: 48.91 MB / 10.34 GB, free: 152.1 MB / 1.495 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt symbolicJacobian (simulation): time 0.3015/41, allocations: 118.3 MB / 10.45 GB, free: 149.8 MB / 1.495 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt removeConstants (simulation): time 0.02426/41.03, allocations: 7.894 MB / 10.46 GB, free: 148.8 MB / 1.495 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyTimeIndepFuncCalls (simulation): time 0.009913/41.04, allocations: 240.8 kB / 10.46 GB, free: 148.8 MB / 1.495 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyAllExpressions (simulation): time 0.1134/41.15, allocations: 5.668 MB / 10.47 GB, free: 147.9 MB / 1.495 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt findZeroCrossings (simulation): time 0.006005/41.16, allocations: 1.155 MB / 10.47 GB, free: 147.9 MB / 1.495 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt collapseArrayExpressions (simulation): time 0.004576/41.16, allocations: 0.892 MB / 10.47 GB, free: 147.9 MB / 1.495 GB Notification: Performance of sorting global known variables: time 0.02879/41.19, allocations: 10.85 MB / 10.48 GB, free: 147.4 MB / 1.495 GB Notification: Performance of sort global known variables: time 1.193e-06/41.19, allocations: 0 / 10.48 GB, free: 147.4 MB / 1.495 GB Notification: Performance of remove unused functions: time 0.1907/41.38, allocations: 86.81 MB / 10.56 GB, free: 89.59 MB / 1.495 GB Notification: Model statistics after passing the back-end for simulation: * Number of independent subsystems: 5 * Number of states: 74 ($STATESET1.x[32],$STATESET1.x[31],$STATESET1.x[30],$STATESET1.x[29],$STATESET1.x[28],$STATESET1.x[27],$STATESET1.x[26],$STATESET1.x[25],$STATESET1.x[24],$STATESET1.x[23],$STATESET1.x[22],$STATESET1.x[21],$STATESET1.x[20],$STATESET1.x[19],$STATESET1.x[18],$STATESET1.x[17],$STATESET1.x[16],$STATESET1.x[15],$STATESET1.x[14],$STATESET1.x[13],$STATESET1.x[12],$STATESET1.x[11],$STATESET1.x[10],$STATESET1.x[9],$STATESET1.x[8],$STATESET1.x[7],$STATESET1.x[6],$STATESET1.x[5],$STATESET1.x[4],$STATESET1.x[3],$STATESET1.x[2],$STATESET1.x[1],pmpSouth.vol.dynBal.U,pmpSouth.filter.s[1],pmpNorth.vol.dynBal.U,pmpNorth.filter.s[1],valSouth1[1].filter.s[1],valSouth1[2].filter.s[1],valSouth1[3].filter.s[1],valSouth1[4].filter.s[1],valSouth2[1].filter.s[1],valSouth2[2].filter.s[1],valSouth2[3].filter.s[1],valSouth2[4].filter.s[1],valSouth2[5].filter.s[1],valSouth2[6].filter.s[1],valSouth2[7].filter.s[1],valSouth2[8].filter.s[1],valNorth1[1].filter.s[1],valNorth1[2].filter.s[1],valNorth1[3].filter.s[1],valNorth1[4].filter.s[1],valNorth2[1].filter.s[1],valNorth2[2].filter.s[1],valNorth2[3].filter.s[1],valNorth2[4].filter.s[1],valNorth2[5].filter.s[1],valNorth2[6].filter.s[1],valNorth2[7].filter.s[1],valNorth2[8].filter.s[1],valSouth.vol.dynBal.U,valSouth.filter.s[1],valNorth.vol.dynBal.U,valNorth.filter.s[1],spl.vol.dynBal.U,spl1.vol.dynBal.U,pumpHea.vol.dynBal.U,pumpHea.filter.s[1],valHea.filter.s[1],valCoo.filter.s[1],spl2.vol.dynBal.U,spl3.vol.dynBal.U,pumpCoo.vol.dynBal.U,pumpCoo.filter.s[1]) * Number of discrete variables: 7 ($whenCondition2,$whenCondition1,booleanToInteger.u,booleanToInteger.y,stepPump.pulseStart,stepValve.T_start,stepValve.count) * Number of discrete states: 1 (stepValve.count) * Top-level inputs: 0 Notification: Strong component statistics for simulation (643): * Single equations (assignments): 620 * Array equations: 0 * Algorithm blocks: 0 * Record equations: 10 * When equations: 3 * If-equations: 0 * Equation systems (linear and non-linear blocks): 7 * Torn equation systems: 3 * Mixed (continuous/discrete) equation systems: 0 Notification: Equation system details: * Constant Jacobian: 0 * Linear Jacobian (size,density): 0 * Non-linear Jacobian: 7 {1,1,1,1,1,1,1} * Without analytic Jacobian: 0 Notification: Torn system details for strict tearing set: * Linear torn systems: 1 {(28,89.3%) 28} * Non-linear torn systems: 2 {33 118,61 213} Notification: Performance of Backend phase and start with SimCode phase: time 0.2875/41.67, allocations: 123.5 MB / 10.68 GB, free: 14.95 MB / 1.495 GB Notification: Performance of simCode: created initialization part: time 1.245/42.91, allocations: 94.99 MB / 10.78 GB, free: 197.3 MB / 1.51 GB Notification: Performance of simCode: created event and clocks part: time 1.154e-05/42.91, allocations: 7.156 kB / 10.78 GB, free: 197.3 MB / 1.51 GB Notification: Performance of simCode: created simulation system equations: time 0.1568/43.07, allocations: 84.87 MB / 10.86 GB, free: 188.8 MB / 1.51 GB Notification: Performance of simCode: created of all other equations (e.g. parameter, nominal, assert, etc): time 0.07075/43.14, allocations: 7.471 MB / 10.87 GB, free: 188.4 MB / 1.51 GB Notification: Performance of simCode: created linear, non-linear and system jacobian parts: time 0.2068/43.35, allocations: 58.26 MB / 10.92 GB, free: 180.1 MB / 1.51 GB Notification: Performance of simCode: some other stuff during SimCode phase: time 0.01924/43.37, allocations: 11.06 MB / 10.94 GB, free: 178.6 MB / 1.51 GB Notification: Performance of simCode: alias equations: time 0.05238/43.42, allocations: 12.08 MB / 10.95 GB, free: 177.8 MB / 1.51 GB Notification: Performance of simCode: all other stuff during SimCode phase: time 0.02466/43.45, allocations: 10.89 MB / 10.96 GB, free: 177.8 MB / 1.51 GB Notification: Performance of SimCode: time 1.472e-06/43.45, allocations: 1.75 kB / 10.96 GB, free: 177.8 MB / 1.51 GB Notification: Performance of buildModelFMU: Generate the FMI files: time 5.159/48.6, allocations: 0.906 GB / 11.86 GB, free: 236.5 MB / 1.604 GB Notification: Performance of buildModelFMU: configured platform static using cached values: time 0.000172/48.61, allocations: 222 kB / 11.86 GB, free: 236.2 MB / 1.604 GB Notification: Performance of buildModelFMU: Generate platform static: time 46.92/95.53, allocations: 0 / 11.86 GB, free: 236.2 MB / 1.604 GB (rm -f Buildings_9_Buildings.Fluid.Examples.FlowSystem.Basic.pipe ; mkfifo Buildings_9_Buildings.Fluid.Examples.FlowSystem.Basic.pipe ; head -c 1048576 < Buildings_9_Buildings.Fluid.Examples.FlowSystem.Basic.pipe >> ../files/Buildings_9_Buildings.Fluid.Examples.FlowSystem.Basic.sim & /home/hudson/saved_omc/OMSimulator/install/linux/bin/OMSimulator -r=Buildings_9_Buildings.Fluid.Examples.FlowSystem.Basic_res.mat --tempDir=temp_Buildings_9_Buildings_Fluid_Examples_FlowSystem_Basic_fmu --startTime=0 --stopTime=1000 --timeout=50 --tolerance=1e-06 Buildings_9_Buildings_Fluid_Examples_FlowSystem_Basic.fmu > Buildings_9_Buildings.Fluid.Examples.FlowSystem.Basic.pipe 2>&1) TODO: How the !@#!# did the simulation report success but simulation result Buildings_9_Buildings.Fluid.Examples.FlowSystem.Basic_res.mat does not exist to compare? outputFormat=mat