Running: ./testmodel.py --libraries=/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/ --ompython_omhome=/usr Buildings_7.0.0_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.conf.json Using package ModelicaServices with version 3.2.3 (/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/ModelicaServices 3.2.3+maint.om/package.mo) Using package Modelica with version 3.2.3 (/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Modelica 3.2.3+maint.om/package.mo) Using package Complex with version 3.2.3 (/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Complex 3.2.3+maint.om/package.mo) Using package Buildings with version 7.0.1 (/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Buildings 7.0.1/package.mo) Running command: "" <> buildModelFMU(Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU,fileNamePrefix="Buildings_7_0_0_Buildings_Fluid_HeatExchangers_RadiantSlabs_Examples_StepResponseEpsilonNTU",fmuType="me",version="2.0",platforms={"static"}) Notification: Performance of loadFile(/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Buildings 7.0.1/package.mo): time 2.386/2.386, allocations: 248.5 MB / 261 MB, free: 5.996 MB / 202.7 MB Notification: Performance of loadFile(/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Complex 3.2.3+maint.om/package.mo): time 0.001525/0.001524, allocations: 178.6 kB / 320.4 MB, free: 15.34 MB / 266.7 MB Notification: Performance of loadFile(/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Modelica 3.2.3+maint.om/package.mo): time 1.942/1.942, allocations: 205.2 MB / 0.571 GB, free: 11.8 MB / 426.7 MB Notification: Performance of loadFile(/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/ModelicaServices 3.2.3+maint.om/package.mo): time 0.001127/0.001127, allocations: 93.97 kB / 0.6754 GB, free: 0.8984 MB / 0.5105 GB Notification: Performance of FrontEnd - loaded program: time 4.18e-05/4.185e-05, allocations: 7.984 kB / 0.7869 GB, free: 97.8 MB / 0.5417 GB Notification: Performance of FrontEnd - Absyn->SCode: time 0.2337/0.2338, allocations: 106.3 MB / 0.8907 GB, free: 7.453 MB / 0.5573 GB Notification: Performance of FrontEnd - scodeFlatten: time 2.003/2.237, allocations: 454.3 MB / 1.334 GB, free: 247.1 MB / 0.8698 GB Notification: Performance of FrontEnd - mkProgramGraph: time 0.0003448/2.237, allocations: 100.1 kB / 1.334 GB, free: 247.1 MB / 0.8698 GB Notification: Performance of FrontEnd - DAE generated: time 5.02/7.257, allocations: 0.7848 GB / 2.119 GB, free: 136.8 MB / 0.8698 GB Notification: Performance of FrontEnd: time 2.084e-06/7.257, allocations: 0 / 2.119 GB, free: 136.8 MB / 0.8698 GB Notification: Performance of Transformations before backend: time 0.002232/7.259, allocations: 171.8 kB / 2.119 GB, free: 136.6 MB / 0.8698 GB Notification: Model statistics after passing the front-end and creating the data structures used by the back-end: * Number of equations: 831 * Number of variables: 831 Notification: Performance of Generate backend data structure: time 0.03087/7.29, allocations: 6.879 MB / 2.126 GB, free: 129.6 MB / 0.8698 GB Notification: Performance of prepare preOptimizeDAE: time 5.696e-05/7.29, allocations: 8.031 kB / 2.126 GB, free: 129.6 MB / 0.8698 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt introduceOutputAliases (simulation): time 0.002573/7.293, allocations: 479.2 kB / 2.127 GB, free: 129.2 MB / 0.8698 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt normalInlineFunction (simulation): time 0.007713/7.301, allocations: 0.8493 MB / 2.127 GB, free: 128.3 MB / 0.8698 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt evaluateParameters (simulation): time 0.08338/7.384, allocations: 23.58 MB / 2.15 GB, free: 104.7 MB / 0.8698 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt simplifyIfEquations (simulation): time 0.000533/7.385, allocations: 326.5 kB / 2.151 GB, free: 104.3 MB / 0.8698 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt expandDerOperator (simulation): time 0.002627/7.387, allocations: 463.8 kB / 2.151 GB, free: 103.9 MB / 0.8698 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt clockPartitioning (simulation): time 0.0181/7.406, allocations: 5.324 MB / 2.156 GB, free: 98.34 MB / 0.8698 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt findStateOrder (simulation): time 0.0002489/7.406, allocations: 11.94 kB / 2.156 GB, free: 98.32 MB / 0.8698 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt replaceEdgeChange (simulation): time 0.001677/7.408, allocations: 143.9 kB / 2.156 GB, free: 98.18 MB / 0.8698 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt inlineArrayEqn (simulation): time 0.0001651/7.408, allocations: 91.94 kB / 2.157 GB, free: 98.09 MB / 0.8698 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt removeEqualRHS (simulation): time 0.01302/7.421, allocations: 4.235 MB / 2.161 GB, free: 93.85 MB / 0.8698 GB Warning: The model contains alias variables with conflicting start and/or nominal values. It is recommended to resolve the conflicts, because otherwise the system could be hard to solve. To print the conflicting alias sets and the chosen candidates please use -d=aliasConflicts. Notification: Performance of preOpt removeSimpleEquations (simulation): time 0.07663/7.497, allocations: 29.54 MB / 2.19 GB, free: 63.57 MB / 0.8698 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt comSubExp (simulation): time 0.02353/7.521, allocations: 5.7 MB / 2.195 GB, free: 57.79 MB / 0.8698 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt resolveLoops (simulation): time 0.008431/7.53, allocations: 2.353 MB / 2.197 GB, free: 55.43 MB / 0.8698 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt evalFunc (simulation): time 0.05735/7.587, allocations: 14.18 MB / 2.211 GB, free: 40.72 MB / 0.8698 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt encapsulateWhenConditions (simulation): time 0.005782/7.593, allocations: 1.934 MB / 2.213 GB, free: 38.77 MB / 0.8698 GB Notification: Performance of pre-optimization done (n=214): time 7.565e-06/7.593, allocations: 0 / 2.213 GB, free: 38.77 MB / 0.8698 GB Notification: Performance of matching and sorting (n=222): time 0.04134/7.634, allocations: 11.16 MB / 2.224 GB, free: 27.5 MB / 0.8698 GB Notification: Performance of inlineWhenForInitialization (initialization): time 6.994e-05/7.634, allocations: 128.8 kB / 2.224 GB, free: 27.35 MB / 0.8698 GB Notification: Performance of selectInitializationVariablesDAE (initialization): time 0.03071/7.665, allocations: 10.61 MB / 2.235 GB, free: 16.74 MB / 0.8698 GB Notification: Performance of collectPreVariables (initialization): time 0.001289/7.666, allocations: 113.7 kB / 2.235 GB, free: 16.62 MB / 0.8698 GB Notification: Performance of collectInitialEqns (initialization): time 0.007257/7.674, allocations: 3.211 MB / 2.238 GB, free: 13.39 MB / 0.8698 GB Notification: Performance of collectInitialBindings (initialization): time 0.00273/7.677, allocations: 0.8245 MB / 2.239 GB, free: 12.55 MB / 0.8698 GB Notification: Performance of simplifyInitialFunctions (initialization): time 0.001026/7.678, allocations: 100 kB / 2.239 GB, free: 12.45 MB / 0.8698 GB Notification: Performance of setup shared object (initialization): time 0.0007986/7.678, allocations: 0.5243 MB / 2.239 GB, free: 11.92 MB / 0.8698 GB Notification: Performance of preBalanceInitialSystem (initialization): time 0.008184/7.687, allocations: 3 MB / 2.242 GB, free: 8.914 MB / 0.8698 GB Notification: Performance of partitionIndependentBlocks (initialization): time 0.009737/7.696, allocations: 5.452 MB / 2.247 GB, free: 2.266 MB / 0.8698 GB Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[2] = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2]) = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2])) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[2] = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2]) = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2])) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[2] = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2]) = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2])) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[2] = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2]) = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2])) Notification: Performance of analyzeInitialSystem (initialization): time 0.7561/8.453, allocations: 25.78 MB / 2.273 GB, free: 157.1 MB / 0.8855 GB Notification: Performance of solveInitialSystemEqSystem (initialization): time 0.0001049/8.453, allocations: 24.38 kB / 2.273 GB, free: 157.1 MB / 0.8855 GB Error: Internal error IndexReduction.pantelidesIndexReduction failed! System is structurally singulare and cannot handled because number of unassigned equations is larger than number of states. Use -d=bltdump to get more information. Error: No system for the symbolic initialization was generated