Running: ./testmodel.py --libraries=/var/lib/jenkins/ws/OpenModelicaLibraryTestingWork/OpenModelica/./OMCompiler/build/lib/omlibrary/ --ompython_omhome=/usr Buildings_6.0.0_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference.conf.json
Using package ModelicaServices with version 3.2.2 (/var/lib/jenkins/ws/OpenModelicaLibraryTestingWork/OpenModelica/OMCompiler/build/lib/omlibrary/ModelicaServices 3.2.2/package.mo)
Using package Complex with version 3.2.2 (/var/lib/jenkins/ws/OpenModelicaLibraryTestingWork/OpenModelica/OMCompiler/build/lib/omlibrary/Complex 3.2.2.mo)
Using package Modelica with version 3.2.2 (/var/lib/jenkins/ws/OpenModelicaLibraryTestingWork/OpenModelica/OMCompiler/build/lib/omlibrary/Modelica 3.2.2/package.mo)
Using package Buildings with version 6.0.0 (/var/lib/jenkins/ws/OpenModelicaLibraryTestingWork/OpenModelica/OMCompiler/build/lib/omlibrary/Buildings 6.0.0/package.mo)
Running command: "" <> buildModelFMU(Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference,fileNamePrefix="Buildings_6_0_0_Buildings_Fluid_HeatExchangers_RadiantSlabs_Examples_StepResponseFiniteDifference",fmuType="me",version="2.0",platforms={"static"})
Notification: Performance of loadModel(Buildings): time 4.368/4.368, allocations: 432.6 MB / 445.2 MB, free: 15.72 MB / 362.7 MB
Notification: Performance of FrontEnd - loaded program: time 3.732e-05/3.745e-05, allocations: 4.703 kB / 0.5383 GB, free: 10.3 MB / 442.7 MB
Notification: Performance of FrontEnd - Absyn->SCode: time 0.2286/0.2286, allocations: 98.74 MB / 0.6347 GB, free: 1.863 MB / 0.5105 GB
Notification: Performance of FrontEnd - scodeFlatten: time 1.252/1.481, allocations: 446 MB / 1.07 GB, free: 9.449 MB / 0.823 GB
Notification: Performance of FrontEnd - mkProgramGraph: time 0.0003374/1.481, allocations: 100.9 kB / 1.07 GB, free: 9.398 MB / 0.823 GB
Notification: Performance of FrontEnd - DAE generated: time 10.29/11.77, allocations: 1.473 GB / 2.544 GB, free: 97.62 MB / 0.8542 GB
Notification: Performance of FrontEnd: time 2.104e-06/11.77, allocations: 3.828 kB / 2.544 GB, free: 97.62 MB / 0.8542 GB
Notification: Performance of Transformations before backend: time 0.002257/11.77, allocations: 170.9 kB / 2.544 GB, free: 97.6 MB / 0.8542 GB
Notification: Model statistics after passing the front-end and creating the data structures used by the back-end:
 * Number of equations: 831
 * Number of variables: 831
Notification: Performance of Generate backend data structure: time 0.03098/11.8, allocations: 6.891 MB / 2.551 GB, free: 95.27 MB / 0.8542 GB
Notification: Performance of prepare preOptimizeDAE: time 5.525e-05/11.8, allocations: 7.812 kB / 2.551 GB, free: 95.27 MB / 0.8542 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt introduceOutputAliases (simulation): time 0.002565/11.8, allocations: 481.1 kB / 2.551 GB, free: 95.21 MB / 0.8542 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt normalInlineFunction (simulation): time 0.007538/11.81, allocations: 0.8582 MB / 2.552 GB, free: 94.78 MB / 0.8542 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt evaluateParameters (simulation): time 0.08599/11.9, allocations: 23.78 MB / 2.575 GB, free: 93.35 MB / 0.8542 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt simplifyIfEquations (simulation): time 0.0005163/11.9, allocations: 327.7 kB / 2.576 GB, free: 93.34 MB / 0.8542 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt expandDerOperator (simulation): time 0.002536/11.9, allocations: 480.2 kB / 2.576 GB, free: 93.33 MB / 0.8542 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt clockPartitioning (simulation): time 0.0169/11.92, allocations: 5.3 MB / 2.581 GB, free: 92.69 MB / 0.8542 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt findStateOrder (simulation): time 0.0002034/11.92, allocations: 14.03 kB / 2.581 GB, free: 92.69 MB / 0.8542 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt replaceEdgeChange (simulation): time 0.001223/11.92, allocations: 141.8 kB / 2.581 GB, free: 92.69 MB / 0.8542 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt inlineArrayEqn (simulation): time 0.0001355/11.92, allocations: 90.97 kB / 2.581 GB, free: 92.69 MB / 0.8542 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt removeEqualRHS (simulation): time 0.01241/11.93, allocations: 4.232 MB / 2.586 GB, free: 92.66 MB / 0.8542 GB
Warning: The model contains alias variables with conflicting start and/or nominal values. It is recommended to resolve the conflicts, because otherwise the system could be hard to solve. To print the conflicting alias sets and the chosen candidates please use -d=aliasConflicts.
Notification: Performance of preOpt removeSimpleEquations (simulation): time 0.07487/12, allocations: 29.81 MB / 2.615 GB, free: 84.22 MB / 0.8542 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt comSubExp (simulation): time 0.01827/12.02, allocations: 5.658 MB / 2.62 GB, free: 83.65 MB / 0.8542 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt resolveLoops (simulation): time 0.006159/12.03, allocations: 2.326 MB / 2.622 GB, free: 83.63 MB / 0.8542 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt evalFunc (simulation): time 0.0415/12.07, allocations: 14.25 MB / 2.636 GB, free: 79.21 MB / 0.8542 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt encapsulateWhenConditions (simulation): time 0.005009/12.08, allocations: 1.893 MB / 2.638 GB, free: 78.63 MB / 0.8542 GB
Notification: Performance of pre-optimization done (n=212): time 6.923e-06/12.08, allocations: 0 / 2.638 GB, free: 78.63 MB / 0.8542 GB
Notification: Performance of matching and sorting (n=220): time 0.03606/12.11, allocations: 10.17 MB / 2.648 GB, free: 74.24 MB / 0.8542 GB
Notification: Performance of inlineWhenForInitialization (initialization): time 6.818e-05/12.11, allocations: 110.7 kB / 2.648 GB, free: 74.14 MB / 0.8542 GB
Notification: Performance of selectInitializationVariablesDAE (initialization): time 0.03115/12.14, allocations: 10.61 MB / 2.659 GB, free: 70.86 MB / 0.8542 GB
Notification: Performance of collectPreVariables (initialization): time 0.001333/12.14, allocations: 120.4 kB / 2.659 GB, free: 70.76 MB / 0.8542 GB
Notification: Performance of collectInitialEqns (initialization): time 0.007296/12.15, allocations: 3.227 MB / 2.662 GB, free: 68.34 MB / 0.8542 GB
Notification: Performance of collectInitialBindings (initialization): time 0.00253/12.15, allocations: 0.8244 MB / 2.663 GB, free: 67.72 MB / 0.8542 GB
Notification: Performance of simplifyInitialFunctions (initialization): time 0.00121/12.16, allocations: 100.5 kB / 2.663 GB, free: 67.64 MB / 0.8542 GB
Notification: Performance of setup shared object (initialization): time 0.0008416/12.16, allocations: 0.5284 MB / 2.663 GB, free: 67.25 MB / 0.8542 GB
Notification: Performance of preBalanceInitialSystem (initialization): time 0.008022/12.16, allocations: 2.991 MB / 2.666 GB, free: 65.66 MB / 0.8542 GB
Notification: Performance of partitionIndependentBlocks (initialization): time 0.01118/12.18, allocations: 6.051 MB / 2.672 GB, free: 59.25 MB / 0.8542 GB
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[2] = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2]) = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2]))
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[2] = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2]) = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2]))
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[2] = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2]) = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2]))
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[2] = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2]) = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2]))
Notification: Performance of analyzeInitialSystem (initialization): time 0.07504/12.25, allocations: 25.78 MB / 2.697 GB, free: 37.61 MB / 0.8542 GB
Notification: Performance of solveInitialSystemEqSystem (initialization): time 0.0001022/12.25, allocations: 24 kB / 2.697 GB, free: 37.59 MB / 0.8542 GB
Error: Internal error IndexReduction.pantelidesIndexReduction failed! System is structurally singulare and cannot handled because number of unassigned equations is larger than number of states. Use -d=bltdump to get more information.
Error: No system for the symbolic initialization was generated