Running: ./testmodel.py --libraries=/var/lib/jenkins/ws/OpenModelicaLibraryTestingWork/OpenModelica/./OMCompiler/build/lib/omlibrary/ --ompython_omhome=/usr Buildings_6.0.0_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.conf.json
Using package ModelicaServices with version 3.2.2 (/var/lib/jenkins/ws/OpenModelicaLibraryTestingWork/OpenModelica/OMCompiler/build/lib/omlibrary/ModelicaServices 3.2.2/package.mo)
Using package Complex with version 3.2.2 (/var/lib/jenkins/ws/OpenModelicaLibraryTestingWork/OpenModelica/OMCompiler/build/lib/omlibrary/Complex 3.2.2.mo)
Using package Modelica with version 3.2.2 (/var/lib/jenkins/ws/OpenModelicaLibraryTestingWork/OpenModelica/OMCompiler/build/lib/omlibrary/Modelica 3.2.2/package.mo)
Using package Buildings with version 6.0.0 (/var/lib/jenkins/ws/OpenModelicaLibraryTestingWork/OpenModelica/OMCompiler/build/lib/omlibrary/Buildings 6.0.0/package.mo)
Running command: "" <> buildModelFMU(Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU,fileNamePrefix="Buildings_6_0_0_Buildings_Fluid_HeatExchangers_RadiantSlabs_Examples_StepResponseEpsilonNTU",fmuType="me",version="2.0",platforms={"static"})
Notification: Performance of loadModel(Buildings): time 4.174/4.174, allocations: 432.6 MB / 445.2 MB, free: 15.81 MB / 362.7 MB
Notification: Performance of FrontEnd - loaded program: time 4.623e-05/4.64e-05, allocations: 9.047 kB / 0.5383 GB, free: 10.27 MB / 442.7 MB
Notification: Performance of FrontEnd - Absyn->SCode: time 0.2189/0.219, allocations: 98.73 MB / 0.6347 GB, free: 1.891 MB / 0.5105 GB
Notification: Performance of FrontEnd - scodeFlatten: time 1.295/1.515, allocations: 445.8 MB / 1.07 GB, free: 9.652 MB / 0.823 GB
Notification: Performance of FrontEnd - mkProgramGraph: time 0.0003517/1.515, allocations: 101.3 kB / 1.07 GB, free: 9.602 MB / 0.823 GB
Notification: Performance of FrontEnd - DAE generated: time 5.83/7.346, allocations: 0.8309 GB / 1.901 GB, free: 145.2 MB / 0.8386 GB
Notification: Performance of FrontEnd: time 2.615e-06/7.346, allocations: 2.719 kB / 1.901 GB, free: 145.2 MB / 0.8386 GB
Notification: Performance of Transformations before backend: time 0.002189/7.348, allocations: 173.8 kB / 1.901 GB, free: 145.2 MB / 0.8386 GB
Notification: Model statistics after passing the front-end and creating the data structures used by the back-end:
 * Number of equations: 831
 * Number of variables: 831
Notification: Performance of Generate backend data structure: time 0.02973/7.378, allocations: 6.895 MB / 1.908 GB, free: 142.6 MB / 0.8386 GB
Notification: Performance of prepare preOptimizeDAE: time 5.323e-05/7.378, allocations: 11.03 kB / 1.908 GB, free: 142.6 MB / 0.8386 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt introduceOutputAliases (simulation): time 0.002387/7.38, allocations: 474 kB / 1.908 GB, free: 142.5 MB / 0.8386 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt normalInlineFunction (simulation): time 0.007297/7.387, allocations: 0.8568 MB / 1.909 GB, free: 142.1 MB / 0.8386 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt evaluateParameters (simulation): time 0.0849/7.472, allocations: 23.76 MB / 1.932 GB, free: 140.3 MB / 0.8386 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt simplifyIfEquations (simulation): time 0.0005033/7.473, allocations: 335.7 kB / 1.933 GB, free: 140.3 MB / 0.8386 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt expandDerOperator (simulation): time 0.002584/7.475, allocations: 474.6 kB / 1.933 GB, free: 140.3 MB / 0.8386 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt clockPartitioning (simulation): time 0.01587/7.491, allocations: 5.303 MB / 1.938 GB, free: 139.6 MB / 0.8386 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt findStateOrder (simulation): time 0.0001885/7.492, allocations: 20.25 kB / 1.938 GB, free: 139.6 MB / 0.8386 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt replaceEdgeChange (simulation): time 0.0006486/7.492, allocations: 137.4 kB / 1.939 GB, free: 139.6 MB / 0.8386 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt inlineArrayEqn (simulation): time 0.0001233/7.492, allocations: 89.83 kB / 1.939 GB, free: 139.6 MB / 0.8386 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt removeEqualRHS (simulation): time 0.01237/7.505, allocations: 4.231 MB / 1.943 GB, free: 139.6 MB / 0.8386 GB
Warning: The model contains alias variables with conflicting start and/or nominal values. It is recommended to resolve the conflicts, because otherwise the system could be hard to solve. To print the conflicting alias sets and the chosen candidates please use -d=aliasConflicts.
Notification: Performance of preOpt removeSimpleEquations (simulation): time 0.07584/7.581, allocations: 29.81 MB / 1.972 GB, free: 120.7 MB / 0.8386 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt comSubExp (simulation): time 0.0182/7.599, allocations: 5.667 MB / 1.977 GB, free: 114.9 MB / 0.8386 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt resolveLoops (simulation): time 0.005613/7.605, allocations: 2.326 MB / 1.98 GB, free: 112.6 MB / 0.8386 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt evalFunc (simulation): time 0.03767/7.642, allocations: 14.23 MB / 1.994 GB, free: 97.88 MB / 0.8386 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt encapsulateWhenConditions (simulation): time 0.004001/7.646, allocations: 1.897 MB / 1.995 GB, free: 95.96 MB / 0.8386 GB
Notification: Performance of pre-optimization done (n=212): time 7.314e-06/7.647, allocations: 3.891 kB / 1.995 GB, free: 95.96 MB / 0.8386 GB
Notification: Performance of matching and sorting (n=220): time 0.03184/7.678, allocations: 10.16 MB / 2.005 GB, free: 85.73 MB / 0.8386 GB
Notification: Performance of inlineWhenForInitialization (initialization): time 8.416e-05/7.678, allocations: 107.1 kB / 2.005 GB, free: 85.61 MB / 0.8386 GB
Notification: Performance of selectInitializationVariablesDAE (initialization): time 0.02722/7.706, allocations: 10.61 MB / 2.016 GB, free: 75 MB / 0.8386 GB
Notification: Performance of collectPreVariables (initialization): time 0.001331/7.707, allocations: 121.7 kB / 2.016 GB, free: 74.88 MB / 0.8386 GB
Notification: Performance of collectInitialEqns (initialization): time 0.006277/7.713, allocations: 3.232 MB / 2.019 GB, free: 71.63 MB / 0.8386 GB
Notification: Performance of collectInitialBindings (initialization): time 0.002434/7.716, allocations: 0.8245 MB / 2.02 GB, free: 70.79 MB / 0.8386 GB
Notification: Performance of simplifyInitialFunctions (initialization): time 0.0006452/7.717, allocations: 100 kB / 2.02 GB, free: 70.7 MB / 0.8386 GB
Notification: Performance of setup shared object (initialization): time 0.0006134/7.717, allocations: 0.5321 MB / 2.021 GB, free: 70.16 MB / 0.8386 GB
Notification: Performance of preBalanceInitialSystem (initialization): time 0.006989/7.724, allocations: 2.996 MB / 2.023 GB, free: 67.15 MB / 0.8386 GB
Notification: Performance of partitionIndependentBlocks (initialization): time 0.01017/7.734, allocations: 6.05 MB / 2.029 GB, free: 59.89 MB / 0.8386 GB
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[2] = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2]) = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2]))
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[2] = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2]) = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2]))
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[2] = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2]) = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2]))
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[2] = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2]) = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2]))
Notification: Performance of analyzeInitialSystem (initialization): time 0.06946/7.804, allocations: 25.78 MB / 2.055 GB, free: 34.08 MB / 0.8386 GB
Notification: Performance of solveInitialSystemEqSystem (initialization): time 8.857e-05/7.804, allocations: 24 kB / 2.055 GB, free: 34.06 MB / 0.8386 GB
Error: Internal error IndexReduction.pantelidesIndexReduction failed! System is structurally singulare and cannot handled because number of unassigned equations is larger than number of states. Use -d=bltdump to get more information.
Error: No system for the symbolic initialization was generated