Running: ./testmodel.py --libraries=/var/lib/jenkins/ws/OpenModelicaLibraryTestingWork/OpenModelica/./OMCompiler/build/lib/omlibrary/ --ompython_omhome=/usr Buildings_6.0.0_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.SingleCircuitMultipleCircuitFiniteDifference.conf.json Using package ModelicaServices with version 3.2.2 (/var/lib/jenkins/ws/OpenModelicaLibraryTestingWork/OpenModelica/OMCompiler/build/lib/omlibrary/ModelicaServices 3.2.2/package.mo) Using package Complex with version 3.2.2 (/var/lib/jenkins/ws/OpenModelicaLibraryTestingWork/OpenModelica/OMCompiler/build/lib/omlibrary/Complex 3.2.2.mo) Using package Modelica with version 3.2.2 (/var/lib/jenkins/ws/OpenModelicaLibraryTestingWork/OpenModelica/OMCompiler/build/lib/omlibrary/Modelica 3.2.2/package.mo) Using package Buildings with version 6.0.0 (/var/lib/jenkins/ws/OpenModelicaLibraryTestingWork/OpenModelica/OMCompiler/build/lib/omlibrary/Buildings 6.0.0/package.mo) Running command: "" <> buildModelFMU(Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.SingleCircuitMultipleCircuitFiniteDifference,fileNamePrefix="Buildings_6_0_0_Buildings_Fluid_HeatExchangers_RadiantSlabs_Examples_SingleCircuitMultipleCircuitFiniteDifference",fmuType="me",version="2.0",platforms={"static"}) Notification: Performance of loadModel(Buildings): time 4.296/4.296, allocations: 432.6 MB / 445.2 MB, free: 15.82 MB / 362.7 MB Notification: Performance of FrontEnd - loaded program: time 3.398e-05/3.431e-05, allocations: 4.344 kB / 0.5383 GB, free: 10.28 MB / 442.7 MB Notification: Performance of FrontEnd - Absyn->SCode: time 0.2198/0.2198, allocations: 98.73 MB / 0.6347 GB, free: 1.898 MB / 0.5105 GB Notification: Performance of FrontEnd - scodeFlatten: time 1.318/1.538, allocations: 449.9 MB / 1.074 GB, free: 5.535 MB / 0.823 GB Notification: Performance of FrontEnd - mkProgramGraph: time 0.0003707/1.538, allocations: 93.95 kB / 1.074 GB, free: 5.488 MB / 0.823 GB Notification: Performance of FrontEnd - DAE generated: time 30.24/31.78, allocations: 4.491 GB / 5.565 GB, free: 50.48 MB / 0.948 GB Notification: Performance of FrontEnd: time 1.974e-06/31.78, allocations: 0 / 5.565 GB, free: 50.48 MB / 0.948 GB Notification: Performance of Transformations before backend: time 0.0076/31.79, allocations: 490.5 kB / 5.566 GB, free: 50.42 MB / 0.948 GB Notification: Model statistics after passing the front-end and creating the data structures used by the back-end: * Number of equations: 2436 * Number of variables: 2436 Notification: Performance of Generate backend data structure: time 0.08809/31.87, allocations: 19.37 MB / 5.585 GB, free: 44.36 MB / 0.948 GB Notification: Performance of prepare preOptimizeDAE: time 5.293e-05/31.87, allocations: 10.81 kB / 5.585 GB, free: 44.36 MB / 0.948 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt introduceOutputAliases (simulation): time 0.007691/31.88, allocations: 1.317 MB / 5.586 GB, free: 44.26 MB / 0.948 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt normalInlineFunction (simulation): time 0.0231/31.91, allocations: 2.506 MB / 5.589 GB, free: 43.02 MB / 0.948 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt evaluateParameters (simulation): time 0.2432/32.15, allocations: 68.08 MB / 5.655 GB, free: 39.33 MB / 0.948 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt simplifyIfEquations (simulation): time 0.001651/32.15, allocations: 0.9516 MB / 5.656 GB, free: 39.31 MB / 0.948 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt expandDerOperator (simulation): time 0.00815/32.16, allocations: 1.378 MB / 5.657 GB, free: 39.29 MB / 0.948 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt clockPartitioning (simulation): time 0.05547/32.21, allocations: 15.94 MB / 5.673 GB, free: 37.43 MB / 0.948 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt findStateOrder (simulation): time 0.0007843/32.21, allocations: 35.19 kB / 5.673 GB, free: 37.43 MB / 0.948 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt replaceEdgeChange (simulation): time 0.004906/32.22, allocations: 404 kB / 5.673 GB, free: 37.43 MB / 0.948 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt inlineArrayEqn (simulation): time 0.0004123/32.22, allocations: 271.4 kB / 5.674 GB, free: 37.43 MB / 0.948 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt removeEqualRHS (simulation): time 0.05187/32.27, allocations: 12.9 MB / 5.686 GB, free: 37.35 MB / 0.948 GB Warning: The model contains alias variables with conflicting start and/or nominal values. It is recommended to resolve the conflicts, because otherwise the system could be hard to solve. To print the conflicting alias sets and the chosen candidates please use -d=aliasConflicts. Notification: Performance of preOpt removeSimpleEquations (simulation): time 0.2847/32.56, allocations: 91.89 MB / 5.776 GB, free: 18.34 MB / 0.9636 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt comSubExp (simulation): time 0.05708/32.61, allocations: 17.43 MB / 5.793 GB, free: 12.19 MB / 0.9636 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt resolveLoops (simulation): time 0.01796/32.63, allocations: 7.014 MB / 5.8 GB, free: 10.1 MB / 0.9636 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt evalFunc (simulation): time 0.1336/32.77, allocations: 43.73 MB / 5.842 GB, free: 0 / 0.9792 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt encapsulateWhenConditions (simulation): time 0.01702/32.78, allocations: 5.551 MB / 5.848 GB, free: 11.69 MB / 0.9948 GB Notification: Performance of pre-optimization done (n=607): time 1.181e-05/32.78, allocations: 0 / 5.848 GB, free: 11.69 MB / 0.9948 GB Notification: Performance of matching and sorting (n=631): time 1.015/33.8, allocations: 31.4 MB / 5.879 GB, free: 107.2 MB / 0.9948 GB Notification: Performance of inlineWhenForInitialization (initialization): time 0.0001445/33.8, allocations: 142.5 kB / 5.879 GB, free: 107.1 MB / 0.9948 GB Notification: Performance of selectInitializationVariablesDAE (initialization): time 0.1032/33.9, allocations: 31.98 MB / 5.91 GB, free: 106 MB / 0.9948 GB Notification: Performance of collectPreVariables (initialization): time 0.003945/33.9, allocations: 299.5 kB / 5.91 GB, free: 106 MB / 0.9948 GB Notification: Performance of collectInitialEqns (initialization): time 0.0228/33.93, allocations: 9.9 MB / 5.92 GB, free: 104.4 MB / 0.9948 GB Notification: Performance of collectInitialBindings (initialization): time 0.007643/33.94, allocations: 2.37 MB / 5.922 GB, free: 103.3 MB / 0.9948 GB Notification: Performance of simplifyInitialFunctions (initialization): time 0.003821/33.94, allocations: 300.1 kB / 5.922 GB, free: 103.3 MB / 0.9948 GB Notification: Performance of setup shared object (initialization): time 0.002838/33.94, allocations: 0.9788 MB / 5.923 GB, free: 102.9 MB / 0.9948 GB Notification: Performance of preBalanceInitialSystem (initialization): time 0.02468/33.97, allocations: 9.125 MB / 5.932 GB, free: 102.9 MB / 0.9948 GB Notification: Performance of partitionIndependentBlocks (initialization): time 0.03437/34, allocations: 18.28 MB / 5.95 GB, free: 93.08 MB / 0.9948 GB Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla1.con_b[1].lay[2].T[2] = sla1.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla1.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla1.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla1.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla1.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla1.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2]) (sla1.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla1.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla1.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla1.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla1.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla1.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2]) = sla1.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla1.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla1.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla1.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla1.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla1.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2])) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla1.con_b[2].lay[2].T[2] = sla1.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla1.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla1.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla1.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla1.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla1.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2]) (sla1.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla1.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla1.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla1.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla1.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla1.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2]) = sla1.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla1.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla1.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla1.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla1.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla1.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2])) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla1.con_b[3].lay[2].T[2] = sla1.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla1.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla1.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla1.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla1.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla1.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2]) (sla1.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla1.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla1.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla1.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla1.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla1.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2]) = sla1.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla1.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla1.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla1.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla1.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla1.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2])) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla1.con_b[4].lay[2].T[2] = sla1.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla1.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla1.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla1.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla1.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla1.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2]) (sla1.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla1.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla1.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla1.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla1.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla1.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2]) = sla1.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla1.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla1.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla1.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla1.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla1.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2])) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla1.con_a[1].lay[1].T[1] = sla1.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start (sla1.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla1.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla1.con_a[2].lay[1].T[1] = sla1.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start (sla1.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla1.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla1.con_a[3].lay[1].T[1] = sla1.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start (sla1.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla1.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla1.con_a[4].lay[1].T[1] = sla1.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start (sla1.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla1.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla2.con_a[1].lay[1].T[1] = sla2.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start (sla2.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla2.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla2.con_a[2].lay[1].T[1] = sla2.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start (sla2.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla2.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla2.con_a[3].lay[1].T[1] = sla2.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start (sla2.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla2.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla2.con_a[4].lay[1].T[1] = sla2.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start (sla2.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla2.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla3.sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[1] = sla3.sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start (sla3.sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla3.sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla3.sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[1] = sla3.sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start (sla3.sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla3.sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla3.sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[1] = sla3.sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start (sla3.sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla3.sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla3.sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[1] = sla3.sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start (sla3.sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla3.sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla3.sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[2] = sla3.sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla3.sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla3.sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla3.sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla3.sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla3.sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2]) (sla3.sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla3.sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla3.sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla3.sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla3.sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla3.sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2]) = sla3.sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla3.sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla3.sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla3.sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla3.sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla3.sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2])) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla3.sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[2] = sla3.sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla3.sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla3.sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla3.sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla3.sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla3.sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2]) (sla3.sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla3.sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla3.sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla3.sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla3.sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla3.sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2]) = sla3.sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla3.sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla3.sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla3.sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla3.sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla3.sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2])) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla3.sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[2] = sla3.sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla3.sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla3.sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla3.sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla3.sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla3.sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2]) (sla3.sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla3.sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla3.sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla3.sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla3.sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla3.sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2]) = sla3.sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla3.sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla3.sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla3.sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla3.sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla3.sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2])) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla3.sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[2] = sla3.sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla3.sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla3.sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla3.sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla3.sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla3.sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2]) (sla3.sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla3.sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla3.sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla3.sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla3.sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla3.sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2]) = sla3.sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla3.sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla3.sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla3.sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla3.sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla3.sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2])) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla2.con_b[1].lay[2].T[2] = sla2.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla2.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla2.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla2.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla2.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla2.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2]) (sla2.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla2.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla2.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla2.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla2.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla2.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2]) = sla2.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla2.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla2.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla2.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla2.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla2.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2])) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla2.con_b[2].lay[2].T[2] = sla2.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla2.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla2.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla2.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla2.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla2.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2]) (sla2.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla2.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla2.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla2.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla2.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla2.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2]) = sla2.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla2.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla2.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla2.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla2.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla2.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2])) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla2.con_b[3].lay[2].T[2] = sla2.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla2.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla2.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla2.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla2.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla2.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2]) (sla2.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla2.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla2.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla2.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla2.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla2.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2]) = sla2.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla2.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla2.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla2.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla2.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla2.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2])) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla2.con_b[4].lay[2].T[2] = sla2.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla2.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla2.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla2.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla2.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla2.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2]) (sla2.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla2.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla2.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla2.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla2.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla2.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2]) = sla2.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla2.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla2.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla2.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla2.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla2.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2])) Notification: Performance of analyzeInitialSystem (initialization): time 0.4819/34.48, allocations: 185 MB / 6.131 GB, free: 68.25 MB / 0.9948 GB Notification: Performance of solveInitialSystemEqSystem (initialization): time 0.0004106/34.48, allocations: 72 kB / 6.131 GB, free: 68.18 MB / 0.9948 GB Error: Internal error IndexReduction.pantelidesIndexReduction failed! System is structurally singulare and cannot handled because number of unassigned equations is larger than number of states. Use -d=bltdump to get more information. Error: No system for the symbolic initialization was generated