Running command: "" <> buildModelFMU(Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.SingleCircuitMultipleCircuitFiniteDifference,fileNamePrefix="Buildings_5_0_1_Buildings_Fluid_HeatExchangers_RadiantSlabs_Examples_SingleCircuitMultipleCircuitFiniteDifference",fmuType="me",version="2.0",platforms={"static"})
Notification: Performance of loadModel(Buildings): time 3.873/3.873, allocations: 403.3 MB / 415.4 MB, free: 13 MB / 330.7 MB
Notification: Performance of FrontEnd - loaded program: time 3.916e-05/3.936e-05, allocations: 7.938 kB / 0.4991 GB, free: 13.36 MB / 426.7 MB
Notification: Performance of FrontEnd - Absyn->SCode: time 0.6607/0.6607, allocations: 92.68 MB / 0.5896 GB, free: 14.49 MB / 490.7 MB
Notification: Performance of FrontEnd - scodeFlatten: time 1.369/2.03, allocations: 441.4 MB / 1.021 GB, free: 13.09 MB / 0.7448 GB
Notification: Performance of FrontEnd - mkProgramGraph: time 0.0003266/2.031, allocations: 96.44 kB / 1.021 GB, free: 13.04 MB / 0.7448 GB
Notification: Performance of FrontEnd - DAE generated: time 31.64/33.67, allocations: 4.553 GB / 5.573 GB, free: 50.84 MB / 0.9011 GB
Notification: Performance of FrontEnd: time 2.736e-06/33.67, allocations: 0.75 kB / 5.573 GB, free: 50.84 MB / 0.9011 GB
Notification: Performance of Transformations before backend: time 0.007665/33.68, allocations: 495.4 kB / 5.574 GB, free: 50.78 MB / 0.9011 GB
Notification: Model statistics after passing the front-end and creating the data structures used by the back-end:
 * Number of equations: 2564
 * Number of variables: 2564
Notification: Performance of Generate backend data structure: time 0.09358/33.78, allocations: 20.15 MB / 5.594 GB, free: 44.2 MB / 0.9011 GB
Notification: Performance of prepare preOptimizeDAE: time 4.963e-05/33.78, allocations: 10.41 kB / 5.594 GB, free: 44.2 MB / 0.9011 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt introduceOutputAliases (simulation): time 0.008064/33.78, allocations: 1.383 MB / 5.595 GB, free: 44.09 MB / 0.9011 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt normalInlineFunction (simulation): time 0.02407/33.81, allocations: 2.553 MB / 5.597 GB, free: 42.82 MB / 0.9011 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt evaluateParameters (simulation): time 0.2636/34.07, allocations: 71.55 MB / 5.667 GB, free: 38.8 MB / 0.9011 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt simplifyIfEquations (simulation): time 0.001773/34.07, allocations: 0.9917 MB / 5.668 GB, free: 38.78 MB / 0.9011 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt expandDerOperator (simulation): time 0.008697/34.08, allocations: 1.435 MB / 5.67 GB, free: 38.75 MB / 0.9011 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt clockPartitioning (simulation): time 0.0602/34.14, allocations: 17.21 MB / 5.686 GB, free: 36.54 MB / 0.9011 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt findStateOrder (simulation): time 0.0008317/34.14, allocations: 39.69 kB / 5.686 GB, free: 36.53 MB / 0.9011 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt replaceEdgeChange (simulation): time 0.005589/34.15, allocations: 422.7 kB / 5.687 GB, free: 36.53 MB / 0.9011 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt inlineArrayEqn (simulation): time 0.0003896/34.15, allocations: 296.7 kB / 5.687 GB, free: 36.53 MB / 0.9011 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt removeEqualRHS (simulation): time 0.04275/34.19, allocations: 13.76 MB / 5.701 GB, free: 36.44 MB / 0.9011 GB
Warning: The model contains alias variables with conflicting start and/or nominal values. It is recommended to resolve the conflicts, because otherwise the system could be hard to solve. To print the conflicting alias sets and the chosen candidates please use -d=aliasConflicts.
Notification: Performance of preOpt removeSimpleEquations (simulation): time 0.2324/34.42, allocations: 92.91 MB / 5.791 GB, free: 4.328 MB / 0.9167 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt comSubExp (simulation): time 0.06708/34.49, allocations: 18.44 MB / 5.809 GB, free: 5.09 MB / 0.9323 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt resolveLoops (simulation): time 0.8986/35.39, allocations: 7.893 MB / 5.817 GB, free: 93.82 MB / 0.9323 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt evalFunc (simulation): time 0.1451/35.54, allocations: 47.86 MB / 5.864 GB, free: 86.36 MB / 0.9323 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt encapsulateWhenConditions (simulation): time 0.02039/35.56, allocations: 6.278 MB / 5.87 GB, free: 86.13 MB / 0.9323 GB
Notification: Performance of pre-optimization done (n=668): time 1.64e-05/35.56, allocations: 0 / 5.87 GB, free: 86.13 MB / 0.9323 GB
Notification: Performance of matching and sorting (n=722): time 0.1498/35.71, allocations: 38.01 MB / 5.907 GB, free: 78.11 MB / 0.9323 GB
Notification: Performance of inlineWhenForInitialization (initialization): time 0.0001392/35.71, allocations: 234.8 kB / 5.907 GB, free: 77.92 MB / 0.9323 GB
Notification: Performance of selectInitializationVariablesDAE (initialization): time 0.1057/35.81, allocations: 32.57 MB / 5.939 GB, free: 76.77 MB / 0.9323 GB
Notification: Performance of collectPreVariables (initialization): time 0.00461/35.82, allocations: 312.7 kB / 5.939 GB, free: 76.73 MB / 0.9323 GB
Notification: Performance of collectInitialEqns (initialization): time 0.0251/35.84, allocations: 10.03 MB / 5.949 GB, free: 75.17 MB / 0.9323 GB
Notification: Performance of collectInitialBindings (initialization): time 0.009119/35.85, allocations: 2.68 MB / 5.952 GB, free: 73.85 MB / 0.9323 GB
Notification: Performance of simplifyInitialFunctions (initialization): time 0.004276/35.85, allocations: 315.3 kB / 5.952 GB, free: 73.85 MB / 0.9323 GB
Notification: Performance of setup shared object (initialization): time 0.002906/35.86, allocations: 1.024 MB / 5.953 GB, free: 73.52 MB / 0.9323 GB
Notification: Performance of preBalanceInitialSystem (initialization): time 0.02798/35.89, allocations: 10.15 MB / 5.963 GB, free: 73.48 MB / 0.9323 GB
Notification: Performance of partitionIndependentBlocks (initialization): time 0.03824/35.92, allocations: 19.37 MB / 5.982 GB, free: 63.7 MB / 0.9323 GB
Notification: It was not possible to check the given initialization system for consistency symbolically, because the relevant equations are part of an algebraic loop. This is not supported yet.
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla1.con_b[4].lay[2].T[3] = sla1.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla1.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla1.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla1.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla1.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla1.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla1.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla1.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla1.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla1.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla1.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla1.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla1.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla1.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla1.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla1.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla1.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla1.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla1.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla1.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla1.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]))
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla1.con_a[1].lay[1].T[1] = sla1.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start (sla1.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla1.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla1.con_a[2].lay[1].T[1] = sla1.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start (sla1.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla1.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla1.con_a[3].lay[1].T[1] = sla1.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start (sla1.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla1.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla1.con_a[4].lay[1].T[1] = sla1.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start (sla1.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla1.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla2.con_a[1].lay[1].T[1] = sla2.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start (sla2.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla2.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla2.con_a[2].lay[1].T[1] = sla2.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start (sla2.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla2.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla2.con_a[3].lay[1].T[1] = sla2.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start (sla2.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla2.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla2.con_a[4].lay[1].T[1] = sla2.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start (sla2.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla2.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla3.sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[1] = sla3.sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start (sla3.sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla3.sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla3.sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[1] = sla3.sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start (sla3.sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla3.sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla3.sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[1] = sla3.sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start (sla3.sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla3.sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla3.sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[1] = sla3.sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start (sla3.sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla3.sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start)
Notification: It was not possible to check the given initialization system for consistency symbolically, because the relevant equations are part of an algebraic loop. This is not supported yet.
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla3.sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[3] = sla3.sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla3.sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla3.sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla3.sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla3.sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla3.sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla3.sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla3.sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla3.sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla3.sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla3.sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla3.sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla3.sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla3.sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla3.sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla3.sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla3.sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla3.sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla3.sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla3.sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla3.sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]))
Notification: It was not possible to check the given initialization system for consistency symbolically, because the relevant equations are part of an algebraic loop. This is not supported yet.
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla2.con_b[4].lay[2].T[3] = sla2.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla2.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla2.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla2.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla2.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla2.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla2.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla2.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla2.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla2.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla2.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla2.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla2.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla2.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla2.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla2.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla2.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla2.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla2.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla2.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla2.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]))
Notification: Performance of analyzeInitialSystem (initialization): time 1.469/37.39, allocations: 214.2 MB / 6.191 GB, free: 111.5 MB / 0.9636 GB
Notification: Performance of solveInitialSystemEqSystem (initialization): time 0.0004408/37.39, allocations: 72.09 kB / 6.191 GB, free: 111.5 MB / 0.9636 GB
Error: Internal error IndexReduction.pantelidesIndexReduction failed! System is structurally singulare and cannot handled because number of unassigned equations is larger than number of states. Use -d=bltdump to get more information.
Error: No system for the symbolic initialization was generated