Running: ./testmodel.py --libraries=/var/lib/jenkins/ws/OpenModelicaLibraryTestingWork@2/OpenModelica/../OMCompiler/build/lib/omlibrary/ --ompython_omhome=/usr Buildings_6.0.0_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.conf.json
Using package ModelicaServices with version 3.2.2 (/var/lib/jenkins/ws/OpenModelicaLibraryTestingWork@2/OMCompiler/build/lib/omlibrary/ModelicaServices 3.2.2/package.mo)
Using package Complex with version 3.2.2 (/var/lib/jenkins/ws/OpenModelicaLibraryTestingWork@2/OMCompiler/build/lib/omlibrary/Complex 3.2.2.mo)
Using package Modelica with version 3.2.2 (/var/lib/jenkins/ws/OpenModelicaLibraryTestingWork@2/OMCompiler/build/lib/omlibrary/Modelica 3.2.2/package.mo)
Using package Buildings with version 6.0.0 (/var/lib/jenkins/ws/OpenModelicaLibraryTestingWork@2/OMCompiler/build/lib/omlibrary/Buildings 6.0.0/package.mo)
Running command: translateModel(Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU,tolerance=1e-06,outputFormat="empty",numberOfIntervals=5000,variableFilter="",fileNamePrefix="Buildings_6.0.0_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU")
Notification: Performance of loadModel(Buildings): time 3.822/3.822, allocations: 433.4 MB / 440.9 MB, free: 10.39 MB / 346.7 MB
Notification: Performance of FrontEnd - loaded program: time 2.288e-05/2.299e-05, allocations: 4 kB / 0.5325 GB, free: 1.883 MB / 442.7 MB
Notification: Performance of FrontEnd - Absyn->SCode: time 0.5462/0.5462, allocations: 98.7 MB / 0.6289 GB, free: 15.73 MB / 0.5105 GB
Notification: Performance of FrontEnd - scodeFlatten: time 0.997/1.543, allocations: 445.1 MB / 1.064 GB, free: 1.375 MB / 0.7761 GB
Notification: Performance of FrontEnd - mkProgramGraph: time 0.0002771/1.544, allocations: 97.75 kB / 1.064 GB, free: 1.324 MB / 0.7761 GB
Notification: Performance of FrontEnd - DAE generated: time 4.588/6.132, allocations: 0.8182 GB / 1.882 GB, free: 150.5 MB / 0.823 GB
Notification: Performance of FrontEnd: time 2.035e-06/6.132, allocations: 3.031 kB / 1.882 GB, free: 150.5 MB / 0.823 GB
Notification: Performance of Transformations before backend: time 0.00171/6.134, allocations: 173 kB / 1.882 GB, free: 150.5 MB / 0.823 GB
Notification: Model statistics after passing the front-end and creating the data structures used by the back-end:
 * Number of equations: 831
 * Number of variables: 831
Notification: Performance of Generate backend data structure: time 0.02351/6.157, allocations: 6.892 MB / 1.889 GB, free: 146.7 MB / 0.823 GB
Notification: Performance of prepare preOptimizeDAE: time 4.271e-05/6.157, allocations: 11.34 kB / 1.889 GB, free: 146.7 MB / 0.823 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt normalInlineFunction (simulation): time 0.006266/6.164, allocations: 0.8562 MB / 1.89 GB, free: 146.3 MB / 0.823 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt evaluateParameters (simulation): time 0.06774/6.231, allocations: 23.73 MB / 1.913 GB, free: 128.5 MB / 0.823 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt simplifyIfEquations (simulation): time 0.0002063/6.232, allocations: 104 kB / 1.913 GB, free: 128.4 MB / 0.823 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt expandDerOperator (simulation): time 0.002065/6.234, allocations: 295.9 kB / 1.913 GB, free: 128.1 MB / 0.823 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt removeEqualFunctionCalls (simulation): time 0.009446/6.243, allocations: 4.001 MB / 1.917 GB, free: 124.1 MB / 0.823 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt clockPartitioning (simulation): time 0.01341/6.257, allocations: 4.822 MB / 1.922 GB, free: 119.1 MB / 0.823 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt findStateOrder (simulation): time 0.0001403/6.257, allocations: 15.84 kB / 1.922 GB, free: 119.1 MB / 0.823 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt replaceEdgeChange (simulation): time 0.0007045/6.257, allocations: 4 kB / 1.922 GB, free: 119.1 MB / 0.823 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt inlineArrayEqn (simulation): time 0.0001009/6.258, allocations: 91.98 kB / 1.922 GB, free: 119 MB / 0.823 GB
Warning: The model contains alias variables with conflicting start and/or nominal values. It is recommended to resolve the conflicts, because otherwise the system could be hard to solve. To print the conflicting alias sets and the chosen candidates please use -d=aliasConflicts.
Notification: Performance of preOpt removeSimpleEquations (simulation): time 0.05504/6.313, allocations: 29.2 MB / 1.95 GB, free: 89.3 MB / 0.823 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt comSubExp (simulation): time 0.01237/6.325, allocations: 5.566 MB / 1.956 GB, free: 83.67 MB / 0.823 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt resolveLoops (simulation): time 0.004038/6.329, allocations: 2.259 MB / 1.958 GB, free: 81.42 MB / 0.823 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt evalFunc (simulation): time 0.02905/6.358, allocations: 13.98 MB / 1.972 GB, free: 66.98 MB / 0.823 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt encapsulateWhenConditions (simulation): time 0.003448/6.362, allocations: 1.828 MB / 1.974 GB, free: 65.14 MB / 0.823 GB
Notification: Performance of pre-optimization done (n=211): time 8.01e-06/6.362, allocations: 0 / 1.974 GB, free: 65.14 MB / 0.823 GB
Notification: Performance of matching and sorting (n=219): time 0.02859/6.39, allocations: 9.832 MB / 1.983 GB, free: 55.23 MB / 0.823 GB
Notification: Performance of inlineWhenForInitialization (initialization): time 4.939e-05/6.39, allocations: 110.4 kB / 1.983 GB, free: 55.1 MB / 0.823 GB
Notification: Performance of selectInitializationVariablesDAE (initialization): time 0.02254/6.413, allocations: 10.08 MB / 1.993 GB, free: 45.06 MB / 0.823 GB
Notification: Performance of collectPreVariables (initialization): time 0.001009/6.414, allocations: 33.7 kB / 1.993 GB, free: 45.02 MB / 0.823 GB
Notification: Performance of collectInitialEqns (initialization): time 0.005331/6.419, allocations: 3.178 MB / 1.996 GB, free: 41.82 MB / 0.823 GB
Notification: Performance of collectInitialBindings (initialization): time 0.001817/6.421, allocations: 0.8005 MB / 1.997 GB, free: 41.02 MB / 0.823 GB
Notification: Performance of simplifyInitialFunctions (initialization): time 0.0006149/6.422, allocations: 0 / 1.997 GB, free: 41.02 MB / 0.823 GB
Notification: Performance of setup shared object (initialization): time 0.0005743/6.422, allocations: 0.5282 MB / 1.998 GB, free: 40.48 MB / 0.823 GB
Notification: Performance of preBalanceInitialSystem (initialization): time 0.005415/6.428, allocations: 2.898 MB / 2 GB, free: 37.58 MB / 0.823 GB
Notification: Performance of partitionIndependentBlocks (initialization): time 0.007831/6.436, allocations: 5.915 MB / 2.006 GB, free: 30.41 MB / 0.823 GB
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[2] = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2]) = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2]))
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[2] = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2]) = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2]))
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[2] = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2]) = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2]))
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[2] = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2]) = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2]))
Notification: Performance of analyzeInitialSystem (initialization): time 0.05076/6.487, allocations: 25.1 MB / 2.031 GB, free: 5.09 MB / 0.823 GB
Notification: Performance of solveInitialSystemEqSystem (initialization): time 7.071e-05/6.487, allocations: 20 kB / 2.031 GB, free: 5.07 MB / 0.823 GB
[/var/lib/jenkins/ws/OpenModelicaLibraryTestingWork@2/OMCompiler/build/lib/omlibrary/Buildings 6.0.0/HeatTransfer/Conduction/SingleLayer.mo:154:5-154:73:writable] Error: Initialization problem is structurally singular, error found sorting equations 
 53: sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[1];
22: sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start;
52: sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[1];
17: sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start;
51: sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[1];
12: sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start;
27: sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start;
50: sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[1];
7: sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start;
57: sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[2] = sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T[2];
43: sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[2] = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2]);
56: sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[2] = sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T[2];
40: sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[2] = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2]);
55: sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[2] = sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T[2];
37: sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[2] = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2]);
46: sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T[2] = sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2]);
54: sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[2] = sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T[2];
34: sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[2] = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2]);
 for variables 
 sla.port_b.h_outflow(242), sla.con_b[4].lay[1].T[1](58), sla.surf_a.Q_flow(245), sla.vol[2].dynBal.Hb_flow(219), sou.ports[1].h_outflow(251), sla.vol[1].dynBal.medium.T(234), sla.vol[2].dynBal.ports_H_flow[2](217), sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[1](81), sla.vol[4].dynBal.medium.T(201), sla.vol[3].dynBal.medium.T(212), sla.vol[4].heatPort.Q_flow(202), sla.vol[3].dynBal.Hb_flow(208), sla.vol[2].T(225), sla.vol[3].heatPort.Q_flow(213), sla.con_b[5].lay[2].dT(43), sla.vol[1].dynBal.ports_H_flow[1](229), TOut.mNor_flow(8), hRadAbo.Q_flow(13), conAbo.q_flow(18), sla.T_a_rep.y[5](23), sla.fluSlaCon[2].dT(35), sla.fluSlaCon[1].dT(38), $DER.sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T[1](41), $DER.sla.con_b[5].lay[1].T[1](44)
Error: No system for the symbolic initialization was generated