Running: ./testmodel.py --libraries=/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries --ompython_omhome=/usr Buildings_13_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.conf.json
loadFile("/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/ModelicaServices 4.1.0+maint.om/package.mo", uses=false) [Timeout 180]
"Notification: Performance of loadFile(/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/ModelicaServices 4.1.0+maint.om/package.mo): time 0.0009069/0.0009069, allocations: 80.8 kB / 20.75 MB, free: 3.738 MB / 18.57 MB
"
[Timeout remaining time 180]
loadFile("/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Complex 4.1.0+maint.om/package.mo", uses=false) [Timeout 180]
"Notification: Performance of loadFile(/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Complex 4.1.0+maint.om/package.mo): time 0.0009662/0.0009662, allocations: 161.4 kB / 24.17 MB, free: 328 kB / 18.57 MB
"
[Timeout remaining time 180]
loadFile("/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Modelica 4.1.0+maint.om/package.mo", uses=false) [Timeout 180]
"Notification: Performance of loadFile(/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Modelica 4.1.0+maint.om/package.mo): time 0.92/0.92, allocations: 177.1 MB / 204.6 MB, free: 5.469 MB / 186.7 MB
"
[Timeout remaining time 179]
loadFile("/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Buildings 13.0.2-maint.13.x/package.mo", uses=false) [Timeout 180]
"Notification: Performance of loadFile(/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Buildings 13.0.2-maint.13.x/package.mo): time 1.952/1.952, allocations: 389.6 MB / 0.6354 GB, free: 12.29 MB / 0.6042 GB
"
[Timeout remaining time 178]
Using package Buildings with version 13.0.2 (/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Buildings 13.0.2-maint.13.x/package.mo)
Using package Modelica with version 4.1.0 (/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Modelica 4.1.0+maint.om/package.mo)
Using package Complex with version 4.1.0 (/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Complex 4.1.0+maint.om/package.mo)
Using package ModelicaServices with version 4.1.0 (/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/ModelicaServices 4.1.0+maint.om/package.mo)
Running command: translateModel(Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU,tolerance=1e-06,outputFormat="empty",numberOfIntervals=2500,variableFilter="",fileNamePrefix="Buildings_13_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU")
translateModel(Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU,tolerance=1e-06,outputFormat="empty",numberOfIntervals=2500,variableFilter="",fileNamePrefix="Buildings_13_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU") [Timeout 300]
"Notification: Performance of FrontEnd - loaded program: time 1.232e-06/1.232e-06, allocations: 0 / 0.7752 GB, free: 5.328 MB / 0.7292 GB
Notification: Performance of FrontEnd - Absyn->SCode: time 1.227e-05/1.351e-05, allocations: 5.406 kB / 0.7752 GB, free: 5.324 MB / 0.7292 GB
Notification: Performance of NFInst.instantiate(Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU): time 0.01031/0.01032, allocations: 13.45 MB / 0.7884 GB, free: 7.867 MB / 0.7448 GB
Notification: Performance of NFInst.instExpressions: time 0.01095/0.02127, allocations: 9.674 MB / 0.7978 GB, free: 14.22 MB / 0.7605 GB
Notification: Performance of NFInst.updateImplicitVariability: time 0.0009755/0.02225, allocations: 83.31 kB / 0.7979 GB, free: 14.14 MB / 0.7605 GB
[/var/lib/jenkins/ws/OpenModelicaLibraryTestingWork/OpenModelica/OMCompiler/Compiler/NFFrontEnd/NFCeval.mo:1059:9-1059:67:writable] Error: Internal error NFCeval.evalBinaryAdd failed to evaluate ‘i + 1‘
Notification: Performance of NFTyping.typeComponents: time 0.001639/0.02389, allocations: 0.9471 MB / 0.7988 GB, free: 13.19 MB / 0.7605 GB
Notification: Performance of NFTyping.typeBindings: time 0.002591/0.02648, allocations: 1.917 MB / 0.8007 GB, free: 11.28 MB / 0.7605 GB
Notification: Performance of NFTyping.typeClassSections: time 0.002722/0.0292, allocations: 1.757 MB / 0.8024 GB, free: 9.531 MB / 0.7605 GB
Notification: Performance of NFFlatten.flatten: time 0.01255/0.04175, allocations: 19.71 MB / 0.8216 GB, free: 5.789 MB / 0.7761 GB
Notification: Performance of NFFlatten.resolveConnections: time 0.005812/0.04756, allocations: 5.345 MB / 0.8269 GB, free: 416 kB / 0.7761 GB
Notification: Performance of NFEvalConstants.evaluate: time 0.007708/0.05527, allocations: 7.861 MB / 0.8345 GB, free: 8.578 MB / 0.7917 GB
Notification: Performance of NFSimplifyModel.simplify: time 0.005729/0.061, allocations: 5.715 MB / 0.8401 GB, free: 2.859 MB / 0.7917 GB
Notification: Performance of NFPackage.collectConstants: time 0.0009851/0.06198, allocations: 0.7305 MB / 0.8408 GB, free: 2.129 MB / 0.7917 GB
Notification: Performance of NFFlatten.collectFunctions: time 0.00336/0.06534, allocations: 2.411 MB / 0.8432 GB, free: 15.73 MB / 0.8073 GB
Notification: Performance of NFScalarize.scalarize: time 0.002007/0.06735, allocations: 3.278 MB / 0.8464 GB, free: 12.45 MB / 0.8073 GB
Notification: Performance of NFVerifyModel.verify: time 0.002833/0.07018, allocations: 3.179 MB / 0.8495 GB, free: 9.266 MB / 0.8073 GB
Notification: Performance of NFConvertDAE.convert: time 0.006906/0.07709, allocations: 9.746 MB / 0.859 GB, free: 15.49 MB / 0.823 GB
Notification: Performance of FrontEnd - DAE generated: time 3.386e-06/0.07709, allocations: 0 / 0.859 GB, free: 15.49 MB / 0.823 GB
Notification: Performance of FrontEnd: time 5.81e-07/0.07709, allocations: 0 / 0.859 GB, free: 15.49 MB / 0.823 GB
Notification: Performance of Transformations before backend: time 9.91e-05/0.07719, allocations: 0 / 0.859 GB, free: 15.49 MB / 0.823 GB
Notification: Model statistics after passing the front-end and creating the data structures used by the back-end:
 * Number of equations: 866
 * Number of variables: 866
Notification: Performance of Generate backend data structure: time 0.009012/0.0862, allocations: 8.905 MB / 0.8677 GB, free: 6.52 MB / 0.823 GB
Notification: Performance of prepare preOptimizeDAE: time 3.223e-05/0.08624, allocations: 12.75 kB / 0.8677 GB, free: 6.508 MB / 0.823 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt normalInlineFunction (simulation): time 0.001331/0.08757, allocations: 0.901 MB / 0.8686 GB, free: 5.605 MB / 0.823 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt evaluateParameters (simulation): time 0.006713/0.09428, allocations: 5.931 MB / 0.8744 GB, free: 15.56 MB / 0.8386 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt simplifyIfEquations (simulation): time 0.0001587/0.09444, allocations: 334.8 kB / 0.8747 GB, free: 15.23 MB / 0.8386 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt expandDerOperator (simulation): time 0.000488/0.09493, allocations: 491.8 kB / 0.8752 GB, free: 14.75 MB / 0.8386 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt clockPartitioning (simulation): time 0.002971/0.0979, allocations: 3.376 MB / 0.8785 GB, free: 11.05 MB / 0.8386 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt findStateOrder (simulation): time 5.987e-05/0.09796, allocations: 15.88 kB / 0.8785 GB, free: 11.03 MB / 0.8386 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt replaceEdgeChange (simulation): time 0.0002229/0.09818, allocations: 140 kB / 0.8786 GB, free: 10.89 MB / 0.8386 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt inlineArrayEqn (simulation): time 7.039e-05/0.09825, allocations: 103.9 kB / 0.8787 GB, free: 10.79 MB / 0.8386 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt removeEqualRHS (simulation): time 0.001624/0.09988, allocations: 1.273 MB / 0.88 GB, free: 9.496 MB / 0.8386 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt removeSimpleEquations (simulation): time 0.01334/0.1132, allocations: 14.39 MB / 0.894 GB, free: 10.75 MB / 0.8542 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt comSubExp (simulation): time 0.003903/0.1171, allocations: 2.714 MB / 0.8967 GB, free: 8.012 MB / 0.8542 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt resolveLoops (simulation): time 0.0009346/0.1181, allocations: 0.7672 MB / 0.8974 GB, free: 7.242 MB / 0.8542 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt evalFunc (simulation): time 0.006564/0.1246, allocations: 4.824 MB / 0.9021 GB, free: 2.395 MB / 0.8542 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt encapsulateWhenConditions (simulation): time 0.0009656/0.1256, allocations: 1.217 MB / 0.9033 GB, free: 1.066 MB / 0.8542 GB
Notification: Performance of pre-optimization done (n=219): time 3.326e-06/0.1256, allocations: 0 / 0.9033 GB, free: 1.066 MB / 0.8542 GB
Notification: Performance of matching and sorting (n=227): time 0.005122/0.1307, allocations: 3.489 MB / 0.9067 GB, free: 13.55 MB / 0.8698 GB
Notification: Performance of inlineWhenForInitialization (initialization): time 5.687e-05/0.1308, allocations: 124.8 kB / 0.9068 GB, free: 13.41 MB / 0.8698 GB
Notification: Performance of selectInitializationVariablesDAE (initialization): time 0.005601/0.1364, allocations: 6.739 MB / 0.9134 GB, free: 6.66 MB / 0.8698 GB
Notification: Performance of collectPreVariables (initialization): time 0.00019/0.1366, allocations: 117.7 kB / 0.9135 GB, free: 6.539 MB / 0.8698 GB
Notification: Performance of collectInitialEqns (initialization): time 0.001181/0.1377, allocations: 2.011 MB / 0.9155 GB, free: 4.504 MB / 0.8698 GB
Notification: Performance of collectInitialBindings (initialization): time 0.0005665/0.1383, allocations: 0.8831 MB / 0.9164 GB, free: 3.613 MB / 0.8698 GB
Notification: Performance of simplifyInitialFunctions (initialization): time 0.0009444/0.1392, allocations: 1.041 MB / 0.9174 GB, free: 2.562 MB / 0.8698 GB
Notification: Performance of setup shared object (initialization): time 6.59e-05/0.1393, allocations: 309 kB / 0.9177 GB, free: 2.258 MB / 0.8698 GB
Notification: Performance of preBalanceInitialSystem (initialization): time 0.0009786/0.1403, allocations: 0.7906 MB / 0.9184 GB, free: 1.445 MB / 0.8698 GB
Notification: Performance of partitionIndependentBlocks (initialization): time 0.001807/0.1421, allocations: 3.053 MB / 0.9214 GB, free: 13.15 MB / 0.8855 GB
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3]))
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3]))
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3]))
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]))
Notification: Performance of analyzeInitialSystem (initialization): time 0.008983/0.1511, allocations: 8.587 MB / 0.9298 GB, free: 3.242 MB / 0.8855 GB
Notification: Performance of solveInitialSystemEqSystem (initialization): time 3.677e-05/0.1511, allocations: 24 kB / 0.9298 GB, free: 3.219 MB / 0.8855 GB
Notification: Performance of matching and sorting (n=654) (initialization): time 0.004487/0.1556, allocations: 3.43 MB / 0.9332 GB, free: 15.71 MB / 0.9011 GB
Notification: Performance of prepare postOptimizeDAE: time 5.756e-05/0.1557, allocations: 77.69 kB / 0.9333 GB, free: 15.63 MB / 0.9011 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyComplexFunction (initialization): time 5.326e-05/0.1557, allocations: 84 kB / 0.9333 GB, free: 15.55 MB / 0.9011 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt tearingSystem (initialization): time 0.0008528/0.1566, allocations: 441.5 kB / 0.9338 GB, free: 15.09 MB / 0.9011 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt solveSimpleEquations (initialization): time 0.002748/0.1593, allocations: 1.505 MB / 0.9352 GB, free: 13.58 MB / 0.9011 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt calculateStrongComponentJacobians (initialization): time 0.004612/0.1639, allocations: 9.892 MB / 0.9449 GB, free: 3.012 MB / 0.9011 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyAllExpressions (initialization): time 0.00284/0.1668, allocations: 199.9 kB / 0.9451 GB, free: 2.816 MB / 0.9011 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt collapseArrayExpressions (initialization): time 0.0002574/0.167, allocations: 232 kB / 0.9453 GB, free: 2.59 MB / 0.9011 GB
Warning: The initial conditions are over specified. The following 8 initial equations are redundant, so they are removed from the initialization system:
         sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start
         sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start
         sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start
         sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start
         sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3])
         sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3])
         sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3])
         sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]).
Notification: Performance of preBalanceInitialSystem (initialization_lambda0): time 0.002129/0.1692, allocations: 1.153 MB / 0.9464 GB, free: 1.414 MB / 0.9011 GB
Notification: Performance of partitionIndependentBlocks (initialization_lambda0): time 0.001815/0.171, allocations: 3.061 MB / 0.9494 GB, free: 13.11 MB / 0.9167 GB
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3]))
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3]))
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3]))
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]))
Notification: Performance of analyzeInitialSystem (initialization_lambda0): time 0.008914/0.1799, allocations: 8.384 MB / 0.9576 GB, free: 3.406 MB / 0.9167 GB
Notification: Performance of solveInitialSystemEqSystem (initialization_lambda0): time 2.643e-05/0.1799, allocations: 24 kB / 0.9576 GB, free: 3.383 MB / 0.9167 GB
Notification: Performance of matching and sorting (n=654) (initialization_lambda0): time 0.004176/0.1841, allocations: 3.431 MB / 0.961 GB, free: 15.87 MB / 0.9323 GB
Notification: Performance of prepare postOptimizeDAE: time 4.65e-05/0.1841, allocations: 69.7 kB / 0.961 GB, free: 15.8 MB / 0.9323 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyComplexFunction (initialization): time 6.112e-05/0.1842, allocations: 84 kB / 0.9611 GB, free: 15.71 MB / 0.9323 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt tearingSystem (initialization): time 0.0007766/0.185, allocations: 449.7 kB / 0.9615 GB, free: 15.25 MB / 0.9323 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt solveSimpleEquations (initialization): time 0.002834/0.1878, allocations: 1.513 MB / 0.963 GB, free: 13.73 MB / 0.9323 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt calculateStrongComponentJacobians (initialization): time 0.004882/0.1927, allocations: 9.882 MB / 0.9727 GB, free: 3.176 MB / 0.9323 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyAllExpressions (initialization): time 0.00279/0.1955, allocations: 203.9 kB / 0.9729 GB, free: 2.977 MB / 0.9323 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt collapseArrayExpressions (initialization): time 0.0002523/0.1957, allocations: 236 kB / 0.9731 GB, free: 2.746 MB / 0.9323 GB
Warning: The initial conditions are over specified. The following 8 initial equations are redundant, so they are removed from the initialization_lambda0 system:
         sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start
         sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start
         sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start
         sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start
         sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3])
         sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3])
         sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3])
         sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]).
Notification: Model statistics after passing the back-end for initialization:
 * Number of independent subsystems: 384
 * Number of states: 0 ()
 * Number of discrete variables: 5 ($PRE.pulse.count,$PRE.pulse.T_start,pulse.count,pulse.T_start,$whenCondition1)
 * Number of discrete states: 0 ()
 * Number of clocked states: 0 ()
 * Top-level inputs: 0
Notification: Strong component statistics for initialization (630):
 * Single equations (assignments): 622
 * Array equations: 0
 * Algorithm blocks: 1
 * Record equations: 0
 * When equations: 0
 * If-equations: 0
 * Equation systems (not torn): 0
 * Torn equation systems: 7
 * Mixed (continuous/discrete) equation systems: 0
Notification: Torn system details for strict tearing set:
 * Linear torn systems (#iteration vars, #inner vars, density): 7 systems
   {(1,9,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,9,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%)}
 * Non-linear torn systems (#iteration vars, #inner vars): 0 systems
Notification: Performance of prepare postOptimizeDAE: time 0.0007411/0.1965, allocations: 0.7546 MB / 0.9738 GB, free: 1.988 MB / 0.9323 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt lateInlineFunction (simulation): time 0.000632/0.1971, allocations: 431.5 kB / 0.9742 GB, free: 1.566 MB / 0.9323 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt wrapFunctionCalls (simulation): time 0.003031/0.2001, allocations: 1.911 MB / 0.9761 GB, free: 15.62 MB / 0.948 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt inlineArrayEqn (simulation): time 2.109e-05/0.2002, allocations: 27.94 kB / 0.9761 GB, free: 15.59 MB / 0.948 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt constantLinearSystem (simulation): time 7.424e-06/0.2002, allocations: 4 kB / 0.9761 GB, free: 15.59 MB / 0.948 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifysemiLinear (simulation): time 0.001147/0.2013, allocations: 0.8707 MB / 0.977 GB, free: 14.67 MB / 0.948 GB
Warning: The model contains alias variables with redundant start and/or conflicting nominal values. It is recommended to resolve the conflicts, because otherwise the system could be hard to solve. To print the conflicting alias sets and the chosen candidates please use -d=aliasConflicts.
Notification: Performance of postOpt removeSimpleEquations (simulation): time 0.008567/0.2099, allocations: 5.288 MB / 0.9822 GB, free: 9.277 MB / 0.948 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyComplexFunction (simulation): time 7.003e-06/0.2099, allocations: 352 / 0.9822 GB, free: 9.277 MB / 0.948 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt solveSimpleEquations (simulation): time 0.00179/0.2117, allocations: 0.7604 MB / 0.9829 GB, free: 8.516 MB / 0.948 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt tearingSystem (simulation): time 0.000774/0.2124, allocations: 325.5 kB / 0.9832 GB, free: 8.168 MB / 0.948 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt inputDerivativesUsed (simulation): time 0.000211/0.2127, allocations: 119.9 kB / 0.9833 GB, free: 8.051 MB / 0.948 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt calculateStrongComponentJacobians (simulation): time 0.005915/0.2186, allocations: 10.71 MB / 0.9938 GB, free: 12.67 MB / 0.9636 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt calculateStateSetsJacobians (simulation): time 2.625e-06/0.2186, allocations: 3.984 kB / 0.9938 GB, free: 12.67 MB / 0.9636 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt symbolicJacobian (simulation): time 0.003469/0.222, allocations: 2.204 MB / 0.9959 GB, free: 10.36 MB / 0.9636 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt removeConstants (simulation): time 0.001938/0.224, allocations: 0.9526 MB / 0.9969 GB, free: 9.402 MB / 0.9636 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyTimeIndepFuncCalls (simulation): time 0.0006993/0.2247, allocations: 115.9 kB / 0.997 GB, free: 9.289 MB / 0.9636 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyAllExpressions (simulation): time 0.001578/0.2263, allocations: 75.94 kB / 0.997 GB, free: 9.215 MB / 0.9636 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt findZeroCrossings (simulation): time 0.0003094/0.2266, allocations: 165.6 kB / 0.9972 GB, free: 9.051 MB / 0.9636 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt collapseArrayExpressions (simulation): time 0.0001307/0.2267, allocations: 55.95 kB / 0.9973 GB, free: 8.996 MB / 0.9636 GB
Notification: Performance of sorting global known variables: time 0.003333/0.23, allocations: 2.641 MB / 0.9998 GB, free: 6.359 MB / 0.9636 GB
Notification: Performance of sort global known variables: time 1.8e-07/0.23, allocations: 0 / 0.9998 GB, free: 6.359 MB / 0.9636 GB
Notification: Performance of remove unused functions: time 0.008803/0.2388, allocations: 3.945 MB / 1.004 GB, free: 2.414 MB / 0.9636 GB
Notification: Model statistics after passing the back-end for simulation:
 * Number of independent subsystems: 12
 * Number of states: 43 (sla.vol[1].dynBal.U,sla.vol[2].dynBal.U,sla.vol[3].dynBal.U,sla.vol[4].dynBal.U,sla.vol[5].dynBal.U,sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_b[1].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[2].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[3].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[4].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[5].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T[3],TOut.T)
 * Number of discrete variables: 3 ($whenCondition1,pulse.T_start,pulse.count)
 * Number of discrete states: 1 (pulse.count)
 * Number of clocked states: 0 ()
 * Top-level inputs: 0
Notification: Strong component statistics for simulation (205):
 * Single equations (assignments): 194
 * Array equations: 0
 * Algorithm blocks: 0
 * Record equations: 2
 * When equations: 2
 * If-equations: 0
 * Equation systems (not torn): 0
 * Torn equation systems: 7
 * Mixed (continuous/discrete) equation systems: 0
Notification: Torn system details for strict tearing set:
 * Linear torn systems (#iteration vars, #inner vars, density): 7 systems
   {(1,9,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,9,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%)}
 * Non-linear torn systems (#iteration vars, #inner vars): 0 systems
Notification: Performance of Backend phase and start with SimCode phase: time 0.001215/0.2401, allocations: 0.5179 MB / 1.004 GB, free: 1.887 MB / 0.9636 GB
Notification: Performance of simCode: created initialization part: time 0.006973/0.247, allocations: 5.8 MB / 1.01 GB, free: 11.88 MB / 0.9792 GB
Notification: Performance of simCode: created event and clocks part: time 8.966e-05/0.2471, allocations: 73.81 kB / 1.01 GB, free: 11.8 MB / 0.9792 GB
Notification: Performance of simCode: created simulation system equations: time 0.001538/0.2487, allocations: 1.565 MB / 1.011 GB, free: 10.15 MB / 0.9792 GB
Notification: Performance of simCode: created of all other equations (e.g. parameter, nominal, assert, etc): time 0.008365/0.257, allocations: 2.866 MB / 1.014 GB, free: 7.324 MB / 0.9792 GB
Notification: Performance of simCode: created linear, non-linear and system jacobian parts: time 0.0164/0.2734, allocations: 12.12 MB / 1.026 GB, free: 11.07 MB / 0.9948 GB
Notification: Performance of simCode: some other stuff during SimCode phase: time 0.001939/0.2754, allocations: 1.608 MB / 1.028 GB, free: 9.426 MB / 0.9948 GB
Notification: Performance of simCode: alias equations: time 0.004031/0.2794, allocations: 1.041 MB / 1.029 GB, free: 8.395 MB / 0.9948 GB
Notification: Performance of simCode: all other stuff during SimCode phase: time 0.005238/0.2846, allocations: 1.756 MB / 1.03 GB, free: 6.609 MB / 0.9948 GB
Notification: Performance of SimCode: time 1.673e-06/0.2846, allocations: 4 kB / 1.03 GB, free: 6.605 MB / 0.9948 GB
Notification: Performance of Templates: time 0.4386/0.7232, allocations: 148.6 MB / 1.176 GB, free: 147.5 MB / 1.01 GB
"
[Timeout remaining time 299]
make -j1 -f Buildings_13_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.makefile [Timeout 300]
(rm -f Buildings_13_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.pipe ; mkfifo Buildings_13_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.pipe ; head -c 1048576 < Buildings_13_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.pipe >> ../files/Buildings_13_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.sim & ./Buildings_13_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU -abortSlowSimulation -alarm=240 -s gbode -gbm=radauIIA3 -lv LOG_STATS > Buildings_13_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.pipe 2>&1) [Timeout 240]
[Calling sys.exit(0), Time elapsed: 8.080469223205]