Running: ./testmodel.py --libraries=/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries --ompython_omhome=/usr IDEAS_dev_IDEAS.Fluid.Examples.FlowSystem.Basic.conf.json loadFile("/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/ModelicaServices 4.1.0+maint.om/package.mo", uses=false) [Timeout 180] "Notification: Performance of loadFile(/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/ModelicaServices 4.1.0+maint.om/package.mo): time 0.001393/0.001393, allocations: 85.27 kB / 19.87 MB, free: 4.617 MB / 18.57 MB " [Timeout remaining time 180] loadFile("/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Complex 4.1.0+maint.om/package.mo", uses=false) [Timeout 180] "Notification: Performance of loadFile(/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Complex 4.1.0+maint.om/package.mo): time 0.001025/0.001025, allocations: 165 kB / 23.27 MB, free: 1.219 MB / 18.57 MB " [Timeout remaining time 180] loadFile("/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Modelica 4.1.0+maint.om/package.mo", uses=false) [Timeout 180] "Notification: Performance of loadFile(/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Modelica 4.1.0+maint.om/package.mo): time 0.9484/0.9484, allocations: 177.1 MB / 203.7 MB, free: 5.531 MB / 186.7 MB " [Timeout remaining time 179] loadFile("/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/IDEAS master/package.mo", uses=false) [Timeout 180] "[/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/IDEAS master/Examples/PPD12/Structure.mo:531:21-535:34:writable] Warning: Lexer treating \\ as \\\\, since \\e is not a valid Modelica escape sequence. [/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/IDEAS master/Examples/PPD12/Structure.mo:531:21-535:42:writable] Warning: Lexer treating \\ as \\\\, since \\< is not a valid Modelica escape sequence. Notification: Performance of loadFile(/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/IDEAS master/package.mo): time 0.7412/0.7412, allocations: 154.9 MB / 415.1 MB, free: 268 kB / 378.7 MB [/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/IDEAS master/Utilities/Cryptographics/BaseClasses/sha.mo:2:1-19:8:writable] Warning: External function annotation should occur on the external-clause, not on the function. [/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/IDEAS master/Utilities/File/sha2.mo:2:1-9:9:writable] Warning: External function annotation should occur on the external-clause, not on the function. " [Timeout remaining time 179] Using package IDEAS with version 4.0.0 (/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/IDEAS master/package.mo) Using package Modelica with version 4.1.0 (/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Modelica 4.1.0+maint.om/package.mo) Using package Complex with version 4.1.0 (/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Complex 4.1.0+maint.om/package.mo) Using package ModelicaServices with version 4.1.0 (/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/ModelicaServices 4.1.0+maint.om/package.mo) Running command: translateModel(IDEAS.Fluid.Examples.FlowSystem.Basic,tolerance=1e-06,outputFormat="empty",numberOfIntervals=2500,variableFilter="",fileNamePrefix="IDEAS_dev_IDEAS.Fluid.Examples.FlowSystem.Basic") translateModel(IDEAS.Fluid.Examples.FlowSystem.Basic,tolerance=1e-06,outputFormat="empty",numberOfIntervals=2500,variableFilter="",fileNamePrefix="IDEAS_dev_IDEAS.Fluid.Examples.FlowSystem.Basic") [Timeout 660] "Notification: Performance of FrontEnd - loaded program: time 1.433e-06/1.433e-06, allocations: 0 / 0.5211 GB, free: 1.527 MB / 490.7 MB Notification: Performance of FrontEnd - Absyn->SCode: time 2.415e-05/2.558e-05, allocations: 5.438 kB / 0.5211 GB, free: 1.523 MB / 490.7 MB Notification: Performance of NFInst.instantiate(IDEAS.Fluid.Examples.FlowSystem.Basic): time 0.07852/0.07855, allocations: 74 MB / 0.5934 GB, free: 7.281 MB / 0.5573 GB Notification: Performance of NFInst.instExpressions: time 0.05357/0.1321, allocations: 30.48 MB / 0.6232 GB, free: 8.938 MB / 0.5886 GB Notification: Performance of NFInst.updateImplicitVariability: time 0.01481/0.1469, allocations: 0.6042 MB / 0.6237 GB, free: 8.328 MB / 0.5886 GB Notification: Performance of NFTyping.typeComponents: time 0.01092/0.1578, allocations: 4.24 MB / 0.6279 GB, free: 4.062 MB / 0.5886 GB Notification: Performance of NFTyping.typeBindings: time 0.02354/0.1814, allocations: 10.27 MB / 0.6379 GB, free: 9.734 MB / 0.6042 GB Notification: Performance of NFTyping.typeClassSections: time 0.01933/0.2007, allocations: 9.6 MB / 0.6473 GB, free: 116 kB / 0.6042 GB Notification: Performance of NFFlatten.flatten: time 0.3165/0.5172, allocations: 66.48 MB / 0.7122 GB, free: 80.19 MB / 0.6355 GB Notification: Performance of NFFlatten.resolveConnections: time 0.02465/0.5418, allocations: 16.88 MB / 0.7287 GB, free: 78.66 MB / 0.6355 GB Notification: Performance of NFEvalConstants.evaluate: time 0.05079/0.5926, allocations: 21.9 MB / 0.7501 GB, free: 74.95 MB / 0.6355 GB Notification: Performance of NFSimplifyModel.simplify: time 0.02476/0.6174, allocations: 14.79 MB / 0.7645 GB, free: 71.25 MB / 0.6355 GB Notification: Performance of NFPackage.collectConstants: time 0.008038/0.6254, allocations: 1.753 MB / 0.7662 GB, free: 71.25 MB / 0.6355 GB Notification: Performance of NFFlatten.collectFunctions: time 0.01417/0.6396, allocations: 2.7 MB / 0.7689 GB, free: 71.07 MB / 0.6355 GB Notification: Performance of NFScalarize.scalarize: time 0.009728/0.6493, allocations: 6.29 MB / 0.775 GB, free: 67.88 MB / 0.6355 GB Notification: Performance of NFVerifyModel.verify: time 0.01792/0.6672, allocations: 7.363 MB / 0.7822 GB, free: 64.54 MB / 0.6355 GB Notification: Performance of NFConvertDAE.convert: time 0.03313/0.7004, allocations: 18.98 MB / 0.8007 GB, free: 48.22 MB / 0.6355 GB Notification: Performance of FrontEnd - DAE generated: time 8.416e-06/0.7004, allocations: 0 / 0.8007 GB, free: 48.22 MB / 0.6355 GB Notification: Performance of FrontEnd: time 1.153e-06/0.7004, allocations: 0 / 0.8007 GB, free: 48.22 MB / 0.6355 GB Notification: Performance of Transformations before backend: time 0.0009053/0.7013, allocations: 3.938 kB / 0.8008 GB, free: 48.22 MB / 0.6355 GB Notification: Model statistics after passing the front-end and creating the data structures used by the back-end: * Number of equations: 1949 * Number of variables: 1949 Notification: Performance of Generate backend data structure: time 0.03397/0.7352, allocations: 20.31 MB / 0.8206 GB, free: 28.99 MB / 0.6355 GB Notification: Performance of prepare preOptimizeDAE: time 4.339e-05/0.7353, allocations: 8.031 kB / 0.8206 GB, free: 28.98 MB / 0.6355 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt normalInlineFunction (simulation): time 0.01019/0.7455, allocations: 3.615 MB / 0.8241 GB, free: 25.35 MB / 0.6355 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt evaluateParameters (simulation): time 0.02716/0.7726, allocations: 15.85 MB / 0.8396 GB, free: 9.926 MB / 0.6355 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt simplifyIfEquations (simulation): time 0.0009401/0.7736, allocations: 0.6516 MB / 0.8402 GB, free: 9.273 MB / 0.6355 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt expandDerOperator (simulation): time 0.004089/0.7777, allocations: 0.9063 MB / 0.8411 GB, free: 8.375 MB / 0.6355 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt clockPartitioning (simulation): time 0.02047/0.7981, allocations: 10.48 MB / 0.8514 GB, free: 13.71 MB / 0.6511 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt findStateOrder (simulation): time 0.0002382/0.7984, allocations: 14.7 kB / 0.8514 GB, free: 13.7 MB / 0.6511 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt replaceEdgeChange (simulation): time 0.003106/0.8015, allocations: 319.8 kB / 0.8517 GB, free: 13.39 MB / 0.6511 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt inlineArrayEqn (simulation): time 0.0001963/0.8017, allocations: 204 kB / 0.8519 GB, free: 13.19 MB / 0.6511 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt removeEqualRHS (simulation): time 0.01502/0.8167, allocations: 6.264 MB / 0.858 GB, free: 6.965 MB / 0.6511 GB Warning: The model contains alias variables with redundant start and/or conflicting nominal values. It is recommended to resolve the conflicts, because otherwise the system could be hard to solve. To print the conflicting alias sets and the chosen candidates please use -d=aliasConflicts. Notification: Performance of preOpt removeSimpleEquations (simulation): time 0.09067/0.9074, allocations: 52.34 MB / 0.9091 GB, free: 4.934 MB / 0.698 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt comSubExp (simulation): time 0.01012/0.9175, allocations: 5.691 MB / 0.9147 GB, free: 15.47 MB / 0.7136 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt resolveLoops (simulation): time 0.006863/0.9243, allocations: 3.938 MB / 0.9185 GB, free: 11.55 MB / 0.7136 GB Warning: The model contains alias variables with redundant start and/or conflicting nominal values. It is recommended to resolve the conflicts, because otherwise the system could be hard to solve. To print the conflicting alias sets and the chosen candidates please use -d=aliasConflicts. Notification: Performance of preOpt evalFunc (simulation): time 0.04645/0.9708, allocations: 20.91 MB / 0.9389 GB, free: 6.793 MB / 0.7292 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt encapsulateWhenConditions (simulation): time 0.007496/0.9783, allocations: 5.585 MB / 0.9444 GB, free: 0.9883 MB / 0.7292 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt simplifyInStream (simulation): time 0.5328/1.511, allocations: 8.005 MB / 0.9522 GB, free: 151.9 MB / 0.7293 GB Notification: Performance of pre-optimization done (n=548): time 4.405e-05/1.511, allocations: 3.219 kB / 0.9522 GB, free: 151.9 MB / 0.7293 GB Notification: Performance of matching and sorting (n=832): time 0.4196/1.931, allocations: 153 MB / 1.102 GB, free: 75.97 MB / 0.7293 GB Warning: The linear system: 1 : valCoo.m_flow + spl1.res1.m_flow + valNorth.res3.m_flow + valSouth.res3.m_flow + (-tabsSouth1[2].m_flow) - tabsSouth1[1].m_flow - tabsSouth1[3].m_flow - tabsSouth1[4].m_flow - tabsSouth2[1].m_flow - tabsSouth2[2].m_flow - tabsSouth2[3].m_flow - tabsSouth2[4].m_flow - tabsSouth2[5].m_flow - tabsSouth2[6].m_flow - tabsSouth2[7].m_flow - tabsSouth2[8].m_flow - tabsNorth1[1].m_flow - tabsNorth1[2].m_flow - tabsNorth1[3].m_flow - tabsNorth1[4].m_flow - tabsNorth2[1].m_flow - tabsNorth2[2].m_flow - tabsNorth2[3].m_flow - tabsNorth2[4].m_flow - tabsNorth2[5].m_flow - tabsNorth2[6].m_flow - tabsNorth2[8].m_flow - tabsNorth2[7].m_flow = 0.0 2 : tabsSouth1[4].m_flow + tabsSouth1[3].m_flow + tabsSouth1[2].m_flow + tabsSouth1[1].m_flow - pipSouth1.m_flow = 0.0 [ -1.0 , -1.0 ; 1.0 , 1.0 ] * [ tabsSouth1[1].m_flow ; tabsSouth1[2].m_flow ] = [ tabsSouth1[3].m_flow + tabsNorth2[8].m_flow + tabsNorth2[7].m_flow + tabsNorth2[6].m_flow + tabsNorth2[5].m_flow + tabsNorth2[4].m_flow + tabsNorth2[3].m_flow + tabsNorth2[2].m_flow + tabsNorth2[1].m_flow + tabsNorth1[4].m_flow + tabsNorth1[3].m_flow + tabsNorth1[2].m_flow + tabsNorth1[1].m_flow + tabsSouth2[8].m_flow + tabsSouth2[7].m_flow + tabsSouth2[6].m_flow + tabsSouth2[5].m_flow + tabsSouth2[4].m_flow + tabsSouth2[3].m_flow + tabsSouth2[2].m_flow + tabsSouth2[1].m_flow + tabsSouth1[4].m_flow + (-spl1.res1.m_flow) - valCoo.m_flow - valNorth.res3.m_flow - valSouth.res3.m_flow ; pipSouth1.m_flow + (-tabsSouth1[3].m_flow) - tabsSouth1[4].m_flow ] might be structurally or numerically singular for variable tabsSouth1[2].m_flow since U(2,2) = 0.0. It might be hard to solve. Compilation continues anyway. Warning: The linear system: 1 : tabsSouth1[4].m_flow + tabsSouth1[3].m_flow + tabsSouth1[2].m_flow + tabsSouth1[1].m_flow - pipSouth1.m_flow = 0.0 2 : valCoo.m_flow + spl1.res1.m_flow + valNorth.res3.m_flow + valSouth.res3.m_flow + (-tabsSouth1[2].m_flow) - tabsSouth1[1].m_flow - tabsSouth1[3].m_flow - tabsSouth1[4].m_flow - tabsSouth2[1].m_flow - tabsSouth2[2].m_flow - tabsSouth2[3].m_flow - tabsSouth2[4].m_flow - tabsSouth2[5].m_flow - tabsSouth2[6].m_flow - tabsSouth2[7].m_flow - tabsSouth2[8].m_flow - tabsNorth1[1].m_flow - tabsNorth1[2].m_flow - tabsNorth1[3].m_flow - tabsNorth1[4].m_flow - tabsNorth2[1].m_flow - tabsNorth2[2].m_flow - tabsNorth2[3].m_flow - tabsNorth2[4].m_flow - tabsNorth2[5].m_flow - tabsNorth2[6].m_flow - tabsNorth2[8].m_flow - tabsNorth2[7].m_flow = 0.0 [ 1.0 , 1.0 ; -1.0 , -1.0 ] * [ tabsSouth1[2].m_flow ; tabsSouth1[1].m_flow ] = [ pipSouth1.m_flow + (-tabsSouth1[3].m_flow) - tabsSouth1[4].m_flow ; tabsSouth1[3].m_flow + tabsNorth2[8].m_flow + tabsNorth2[7].m_flow + tabsNorth2[6].m_flow + tabsNorth2[5].m_flow + tabsNorth2[4].m_flow + tabsNorth2[3].m_flow + tabsNorth2[2].m_flow + tabsNorth2[1].m_flow + tabsNorth1[4].m_flow + tabsNorth1[3].m_flow + tabsNorth1[2].m_flow + tabsNorth1[1].m_flow + tabsSouth2[8].m_flow + tabsSouth2[7].m_flow + tabsSouth2[6].m_flow + tabsSouth2[5].m_flow + tabsSouth2[4].m_flow + tabsSouth2[3].m_flow + tabsSouth2[2].m_flow + tabsSouth2[1].m_flow + tabsSouth1[4].m_flow + (-spl1.res1.m_flow) - valCoo.m_flow - valNorth.res3.m_flow - valSouth.res3.m_flow ] might be structurally or numerically singular for variable tabsSouth1[1].m_flow since U(2,2) = 0.0. It might be hard to solve. Compilation continues anyway. Warning: The linear system: 1 : valCoo.m_flow.$pDERStateSetJac0.dummyVarStateSetJac0 + spl1.res1.m_flow.$pDERStateSetJac0.dummyVarStateSetJac0 + valNorth.res3.m_flow.$pDERStateSetJac0.dummyVarStateSetJac0 + valSouth.res3.m_flow.$pDERStateSetJac0.dummyVarStateSetJac0 + (-tabsNorth2[8].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac0) - tabsNorth2[7].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac0 - tabsNorth2[6].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac0 - tabsNorth2[5].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac0 - tabsNorth2[4].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac0 - tabsNorth2[3].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac0 - tabsNorth2[2].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac0 - tabsNorth2[1].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac0 - tabsNorth1[4].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac0 - tabsNorth1[3].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac0 - tabsNorth1[2].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac0 - tabsNorth1.1.m_flow.$pDERStateSetJac0.dummyVarStateSetJac0 - tabsSouth2[8].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac0 - tabsSouth2[7].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac0 - tabsSouth2[6].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac0 - tabsSouth2[5].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac0 - tabsSouth2[4].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac0 - tabsSouth2[3].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac0 - tabsSouth2[2].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac0 - tabsSouth2[1].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac0 - tabsSouth1[4].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac0 - tabsSouth1[3].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac0 - tabsSouth1.1.m_flow.$pDERStateSetJac0.dummyVarStateSetJac0 - tabsSouth1.2.m_flow.$pDERStateSetJac0.dummyVarStateSetJac0 = 0.0 2 : tabsSouth1[4].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac0 + tabsSouth1[3].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac0 + tabsSouth1.2.m_flow.$pDERStateSetJac0.dummyVarStateSetJac0 + tabsSouth1.1.m_flow.$pDERStateSetJac0.dummyVarStateSetJac0 - pipSouth1.m_flow.$pDERStateSetJac0.dummyVarStateSetJac0 = 0.0 [ -1.0 , -1.0 ; 1.0 , 1.0 ] * [ tabsSouth1.1.m_flow.$pDERStateSetJac0.dummyVarStateSetJac0 ; tabsSouth1.2.m_flow.$pDERStateSetJac0.dummyVarStateSetJac0 ] = [ tabsNorth2[8].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac0 + tabsSouth1[4].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac0 + tabsSouth1[3].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac0 + tabsSouth2[1].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac0 + tabsSouth2[2].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac0 + tabsSouth2[3].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac0 + tabsSouth2[4].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac0 + tabsSouth2[5].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac0 + tabsSouth2[6].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac0 + tabsSouth2[7].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac0 + tabsSouth2[8].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac0 + tabsNorth1.1.m_flow.$pDERStateSetJac0.dummyVarStateSetJac0 + tabsNorth1[2].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac0 + tabsNorth1[3].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac0 + tabsNorth1[4].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac0 + tabsNorth2[1].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac0 + tabsNorth2[2].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac0 + tabsNorth2[3].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac0 + tabsNorth2[4].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac0 + tabsNorth2[5].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac0 + tabsNorth2[6].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac0 + tabsNorth2[7].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac0 + (-spl1.res1.m_flow.$pDERStateSetJac0.dummyVarStateSetJac0) - valCoo.m_flow.$pDERStateSetJac0.dummyVarStateSetJac0 - valNorth.res3.m_flow.$pDERStateSetJac0.dummyVarStateSetJac0 - valSouth.res3.m_flow.$pDERStateSetJac0.dummyVarStateSetJac0 ; pipSouth1.m_flow.$pDERStateSetJac0.dummyVarStateSetJac0 + (-tabsSouth1[3].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac0) - tabsSouth1[4].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac0 ] might be structurally or numerically singular for variable tabsSouth1.2.m_flow.$pDERStateSetJac0.dummyVarStateSetJac0 since U(2,2) = 0.0. It might be hard to solve. Compilation continues anyway. Notification: Performance of inlineWhenForInitialization (initialization): time 0.03845/1.969, allocations: 33.2 MB / 1.134 GB, free: 46.92 MB / 0.7293 GB Notification: Performance of selectInitializationVariablesDAE (initialization): time 0.017/1.986, allocations: 13.27 MB / 1.147 GB, free: 37.38 MB / 0.7293 GB Notification: Performance of collectPreVariables (initialization): time 0.004426/1.991, allocations: 221.4 kB / 1.147 GB, free: 37.29 MB / 0.7293 GB Notification: Performance of collectInitialEqns (initialization): time 0.008117/1.999, allocations: 8.492 MB / 1.156 GB, free: 32.54 MB / 0.7293 GB Notification: Performance of collectInitialBindings (initialization): time 0.01011/2.009, allocations: 3.186 MB / 1.159 GB, free: 29.93 MB / 0.7293 GB Notification: Performance of simplifyInitialFunctions (initialization): time 0.01376/2.023, allocations: 3.595 MB / 1.162 GB, free: 26.56 MB / 0.7293 GB Notification: Performance of setup shared object (initialization): time 4.605e-05/2.023, allocations: 479.8 kB / 1.163 GB, free: 26.09 MB / 0.7293 GB Notification: Performance of preBalanceInitialSystem (initialization): time 0.01123/2.034, allocations: 4.16 MB / 1.167 GB, free: 21.91 MB / 0.7293 GB Notification: Performance of partitionIndependentBlocks (initialization): time 0.01362/2.047, allocations: 10.74 MB / 1.177 GB, free: 9.312 MB / 0.7293 GB Notification: Performance of analyzeInitialSystem (initialization): time 0.0237/2.071, allocations: 12.37 MB / 1.189 GB, free: 12.43 MB / 0.7449 GB Notification: Performance of solveInitialSystemEqSystem (initialization): time 6.955e-05/2.071, allocations: 12 kB / 1.189 GB, free: 12.41 MB / 0.7449 GB Notification: Performance of matching and sorting (n=1284) (initialization): time 0.8096/2.881, allocations: 69.87 MB / 1.258 GB, free: 145.3 MB / 0.7606 GB Notification: Performance of prepare postOptimizeDAE: time 8.597e-05/2.881, allocations: 55.5 kB / 1.258 GB, free: 145.3 MB / 0.7606 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyComplexFunction (initialization): time 7.685e-05/2.881, allocations: 44.66 kB / 1.258 GB, free: 145.3 MB / 0.7606 GB Notification: Tearing is skipped for linear strong component 6: solving it torn to 33 iteration variables is estimated at 75436 flops against 19186 for the untorn system of size 152. Notification: Performance of postOpt tearingSystem (initialization): time 0.3411/3.222, allocations: 150.5 MB / 1.405 GB, free: 60.42 MB / 0.7606 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt solveSimpleEquations (initialization): time 0.009804/3.232, allocations: 2.784 MB / 1.407 GB, free: 57.78 MB / 0.7606 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt calculateStrongComponentJacobians (initialization): time 0.0533/3.285, allocations: 33.44 MB / 1.44 GB, free: 28.34 MB / 0.7606 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyAllExpressions (initialization): time 0.04014/3.325, allocations: 4.772 MB / 1.445 GB, free: 23.72 MB / 0.7606 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt collapseArrayExpressions (initialization): time 0.006616/3.332, allocations: 1.536 MB / 1.446 GB, free: 22.26 MB / 0.7606 GB Notification: Performance of preBalanceInitialSystem (initialization_lambda0): time 0.01673/3.349, allocations: 4.324 MB / 1.45 GB, free: 18.45 MB / 0.7606 GB Notification: Performance of partitionIndependentBlocks (initialization_lambda0): time 0.01224/3.361, allocations: 10.63 MB / 1.461 GB, free: 6.457 MB / 0.7606 GB Notification: Performance of analyzeInitialSystem (initialization_lambda0): time 0.02225/3.383, allocations: 12.65 MB / 1.473 GB, free: 11.03 MB / 0.7763 GB Notification: Performance of solveInitialSystemEqSystem (initialization_lambda0): time 0.0001298/3.383, allocations: 15.83 kB / 1.473 GB, free: 11.02 MB / 0.7763 GB Notification: Performance of matching and sorting (n=1284) (initialization_lambda0): time 0.5572/3.941, allocations: 68.68 MB / 1.54 GB, free: 169.5 MB / 0.7919 GB Notification: Performance of prepare postOptimizeDAE: time 7.713e-05/3.941, allocations: 52.52 kB / 1.54 GB, free: 169.5 MB / 0.7919 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyComplexFunction (initialization): time 5.877e-05/3.941, allocations: 43.03 kB / 1.54 GB, free: 169.5 MB / 0.7919 GB Notification: Tearing is skipped for linear strong component 7: solving it torn to 24 iteration variables is estimated at 51168 flops against 19186 for the untorn system of size 152. Notification: Tearing is skipped for linear strong component 9: solving it torn to 33 iteration variables is estimated at 75436 flops against 19186 for the untorn system of size 152. Notification: Performance of postOpt tearingSystem (initialization): time 0.3223/4.263, allocations: 148.6 MB / 1.685 GB, free: 87.53 MB / 0.7919 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt solveSimpleEquations (initialization): time 0.008712/4.272, allocations: 2.748 MB / 1.688 GB, free: 84.93 MB / 0.7919 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt calculateStrongComponentJacobians (initialization): time 0.04797/4.32, allocations: 24.35 MB / 1.712 GB, free: 64.09 MB / 0.7919 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyAllExpressions (initialization): time 0.04035/4.36, allocations: 4.816 MB / 1.717 GB, free: 59.44 MB / 0.7919 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt collapseArrayExpressions (initialization): time 0.006178/4.366, allocations: 1.496 MB / 1.718 GB, free: 58.02 MB / 0.7919 GB Notification: Model statistics after passing the back-end for initialization: * Number of independent subsystems: 199 * Number of states: 0 () * Number of discrete variables: 10 ($whenCondition1,stepValve.count,$PRE.stepValve.count,stepValve.T_start,$PRE.stepValve.T_start,pumpHea.stage,stepPump.pulseStart,$PRE.stepPump.pulseStart,stepPump.y,$whenCondition2) * Number of discrete states: 0 () * Number of clocked states: 0 () * Top-level inputs: 0 Notification: Strong component statistics for initialization (828): * Single equations (assignments): 810 * Array equations: 6 * Algorithm blocks: 1 * Record equations: 0 * When equations: 0 * If-equations: 0 * Equation systems (not torn): 9 * Torn equation systems: 2 * Mixed (continuous/discrete) equation systems: 0 Notification: Equation system details (not torn): * Constant Jacobian (size): 0 systems * Linear Jacobian (size,density): 1 system {(152,1.8%)} * Non-linear Jacobian (size): 8 systems {1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1} * Without analytic Jacobian (size): 0 systems Notification: Torn system details for strict tearing set: * Linear torn systems (#iteration vars, #inner vars, density): 1 system {(28,28,89.3%)} * Non-linear torn systems (#iteration vars, #inner vars): 1 system {(33,119)} Notification: Performance of prepare postOptimizeDAE: time 0.008222/4.374, allocations: 0.7672 MB / 1.719 GB, free: 57.62 MB / 0.7919 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt lateInlineFunction (simulation): time 0.01275/4.387, allocations: 1.872 MB / 1.721 GB, free: 56.76 MB / 0.7919 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt wrapFunctionCalls (simulation): time 0.09734/4.484, allocations: 40.69 MB / 1.76 GB, free: 19.44 MB / 0.7919 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt inlineArrayEqn (simulation): time 0.4122/4.897, allocations: 42.27 MB / 1.802 GB, free: 170.7 MB / 0.8075 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt constantLinearSystem (simulation): time 0.0001362/4.897, allocations: 57.62 kB / 1.802 GB, free: 170.7 MB / 0.8075 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifysemiLinear (simulation): time 0.105/5.002, allocations: 41.37 MB / 1.842 GB, free: 169.2 MB / 0.8075 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt removeSimpleEquations (simulation): time 0.1707/5.173, allocations: 83.06 MB / 1.923 GB, free: 153.6 MB / 0.8075 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyComplexFunction (simulation): time 8.981e-05/5.173, allocations: 3.719 kB / 1.923 GB, free: 153.6 MB / 0.8075 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt solveSimpleEquations (simulation): time 0.007393/5.18, allocations: 2.1 MB / 1.925 GB, free: 152.5 MB / 0.8075 GB Notification: Tearing is skipped for linear strong component 13: solving it torn to 33 iteration variables is estimated at 88428 flops against 24582 for the untorn system of size 189. Notification: Performance of postOpt tearingSystem (simulation): time 0.6632/5.843, allocations: 165.2 MB / 2.087 GB, free: 176.2 MB / 0.8075 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt inputDerivativesUsed (simulation): time 0.003878/5.847, allocations: 0.7837 MB / 2.087 GB, free: 176.2 MB / 0.8075 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt calculateStrongComponentJacobians (simulation): time 0.05299/5.9, allocations: 30.07 MB / 2.117 GB, free: 166.4 MB / 0.8075 GB Warning: The linear system: 1 : tabsSouth2[4].dp = valSouth2[4].port_b.p - tabsSouth1[1].port_b.p 2 : tabsSouth2[8].dp = valSouth2[8].port_b.p - tabsSouth1[1].port_b.p 3 : valSouth2[8].dp = valSouth2[2].port_a.p - valSouth2[8].port_b.p 4 : valSouth2[4].dp = valSouth2[2].port_a.p - valSouth2[4].port_b.p [ -1.0 , 0.0 , 0.0 , 1.0 ; 0.0 , 0.0 , -1.0 , 1.0 ; 0.0 , -1.0 , 1.0 , 0.0 ; 1.0 , -1.0 , 0.0 , 0.0 ] * [ valSouth2[4].port_b.p ; valSouth2[2].port_a.p ; valSouth2[8].port_b.p ; tabsSouth1[1].port_b.p ] = [ -tabsSouth2[4].dp ; -tabsSouth2[8].dp ; -valSouth2[8].dp ; -valSouth2[4].dp ] might be structurally or numerically singular for variable tabsSouth1[1].port_b.p since U(4,4) = 0.0. It might be hard to solve. Compilation continues anyway. Warning: The linear system: 1 : tabsSouth1[4].m_flow + tabsSouth1[3].m_flow + tabsSouth1[2].m_flow + tabsSouth1[1].m_flow - pipSouth1.m_flow = 0.0 2 : spl1.res1.m_flow + valNorth.res3.m_flow + valSouth.res3.m_flow + (-tabsNorth2[7].m_flow) - $cse422 - tabsNorth2[8].m_flow - tabsNorth2[6].m_flow - tabsNorth2[5].m_flow - tabsNorth2[4].m_flow - tabsNorth2[3].m_flow - tabsNorth2[2].m_flow - tabsNorth2[1].m_flow - tabsNorth1[4].m_flow - tabsNorth1[3].m_flow - tabsNorth1[2].m_flow - tabsNorth1[1].m_flow - tabsSouth2[8].m_flow - tabsSouth2[7].m_flow - tabsSouth2[6].m_flow - tabsSouth2[5].m_flow - tabsSouth2[4].m_flow - tabsSouth2[3].m_flow - tabsSouth2[2].m_flow - tabsSouth2[1].m_flow - tabsSouth1[4].m_flow - tabsSouth1[3].m_flow - tabsSouth1[1].m_flow - tabsSouth1[2].m_flow = 0.0 [ 1.0 , 1.0 ; -1.0 , -1.0 ] * [ tabsSouth1[1].m_flow ; tabsSouth1[2].m_flow ] = [ pipSouth1.m_flow + (-tabsSouth1[3].m_flow) - tabsSouth1[4].m_flow ; tabsNorth2[7].m_flow + tabsSouth1[4].m_flow + tabsSouth1[3].m_flow + tabsSouth2[1].m_flow + tabsSouth2[2].m_flow + tabsSouth2[3].m_flow + tabsSouth2[4].m_flow + tabsSouth2[5].m_flow + tabsSouth2[6].m_flow + tabsSouth2[7].m_flow + tabsSouth2[8].m_flow + tabsNorth1[1].m_flow + tabsNorth1[2].m_flow + tabsNorth1[3].m_flow + tabsNorth1[4].m_flow + tabsNorth2[1].m_flow + tabsNorth2[2].m_flow + tabsNorth2[3].m_flow + tabsNorth2[4].m_flow + tabsNorth2[5].m_flow + tabsNorth2[6].m_flow + tabsNorth2[8].m_flow + $cse422 + (-valNorth.res3.m_flow) - spl1.res1.m_flow - valSouth.res3.m_flow ] might be structurally or numerically singular for variable tabsSouth1[2].m_flow since U(2,2) = 0.0. It might be hard to solve. Compilation continues anyway. Warning: The linear system: 1 : valSouth2[8].dp = valSouth2[2].port_a.p - valSouth2[8].port_b.p 2 : valSouth2[4].dp = valSouth2[2].port_a.p - valSouth2[4].port_b.p 3 : tabsSouth2[4].dp = valSouth2[4].port_b.p - tabsSouth1[1].port_b.p 4 : tabsSouth2[8].dp = valSouth2[8].port_b.p - tabsSouth1[1].port_b.p [ 1.0 , 0.0 , 0.0 , -1.0 ; 0.0 , 0.0 , 1.0 , -1.0 ; 0.0 , 1.0 , -1.0 , 0.0 ; -1.0 , 1.0 , 0.0 , 0.0 ] * [ valSouth2[8].port_b.p ; tabsSouth1[1].port_b.p ; valSouth2[4].port_b.p ; valSouth2[2].port_a.p ] = [ -valSouth2[8].dp ; -valSouth2[4].dp ; -tabsSouth2[4].dp ; -tabsSouth2[8].dp ] might be structurally or numerically singular for variable valSouth2[2].port_a.p since U(4,4) = 0.0. It might be hard to solve. Compilation continues anyway. Warning: The linear system: 1 : spl1.res1.m_flow + valNorth.res3.m_flow + valSouth.res3.m_flow + (-tabsNorth2[7].m_flow) - $cse422 - tabsNorth2[8].m_flow - tabsNorth2[6].m_flow - tabsNorth2[5].m_flow - tabsNorth2[4].m_flow - tabsNorth2[3].m_flow - tabsNorth2[2].m_flow - tabsNorth2[1].m_flow - tabsNorth1[4].m_flow - tabsNorth1[3].m_flow - tabsNorth1[2].m_flow - tabsNorth1[1].m_flow - tabsSouth2[8].m_flow - tabsSouth2[7].m_flow - tabsSouth2[6].m_flow - tabsSouth2[5].m_flow - tabsSouth2[4].m_flow - tabsSouth2[3].m_flow - tabsSouth2[2].m_flow - tabsSouth2[1].m_flow - tabsSouth1[4].m_flow - tabsSouth1[3].m_flow - tabsSouth1[1].m_flow - tabsSouth1[2].m_flow = 0.0 2 : tabsSouth1[4].m_flow + tabsSouth1[3].m_flow + tabsSouth1[2].m_flow + tabsSouth1[1].m_flow - pipSouth1.m_flow = 0.0 [ -1.0 , -1.0 ; 1.0 , 1.0 ] * [ tabsSouth1[1].m_flow ; tabsSouth1[2].m_flow ] = [ tabsNorth2[7].m_flow + tabsSouth1[4].m_flow + tabsSouth1[3].m_flow + tabsSouth2[1].m_flow + tabsSouth2[2].m_flow + tabsSouth2[3].m_flow + tabsSouth2[4].m_flow + tabsSouth2[5].m_flow + tabsSouth2[6].m_flow + tabsSouth2[7].m_flow + tabsSouth2[8].m_flow + tabsNorth1[1].m_flow + tabsNorth1[2].m_flow + tabsNorth1[3].m_flow + tabsNorth1[4].m_flow + tabsNorth2[1].m_flow + tabsNorth2[2].m_flow + tabsNorth2[3].m_flow + tabsNorth2[4].m_flow + tabsNorth2[5].m_flow + tabsNorth2[6].m_flow + tabsNorth2[8].m_flow + $cse422 + (-valNorth.res3.m_flow) - spl1.res1.m_flow - valSouth.res3.m_flow ; pipSouth1.m_flow + (-tabsSouth1[3].m_flow) - tabsSouth1[4].m_flow ] might be structurally or numerically singular for variable tabsSouth1[2].m_flow since U(2,2) = 0.0. It might be hard to solve. Compilation continues anyway. Warning: The linear system: 1 : tabsSouth2.4.dp.$pDERStateSetJac25.dummyVarStateSetJac25 = valSouth2.4.port_b.p.$pDERStateSetJac25.dummyVarStateSetJac25 - tabsSouth1.1.port_b.p.$pDERStateSetJac25.dummyVarStateSetJac25 2 : valSouth2.4.dp.$pDERStateSetJac25.dummyVarStateSetJac25 = valSouth2.2.port_a.p.$pDERStateSetJac25.dummyVarStateSetJac25 - valSouth2.4.port_b.p.$pDERStateSetJac25.dummyVarStateSetJac25 3 : valSouth2.8.dp.$pDERStateSetJac25.dummyVarStateSetJac25 = valSouth2.2.port_a.p.$pDERStateSetJac25.dummyVarStateSetJac25 - valSouth2.8.port_b.p.$pDERStateSetJac25.dummyVarStateSetJac25 4 : tabsSouth2.8.dp.$pDERStateSetJac25.dummyVarStateSetJac25 = valSouth2.8.port_b.p.$pDERStateSetJac25.dummyVarStateSetJac25 - tabsSouth1.1.port_b.p.$pDERStateSetJac25.dummyVarStateSetJac25 [ 1.0 , 0.0 , 0.0 , -1.0 ; 0.0 , 0.0 , -1.0 , 1.0 ; 0.0 , 1.0 , -1.0 , 0.0 ; 1.0 , -1.0 , 0.0 , 0.0 ] * [ tabsSouth1.1.port_b.p.$pDERStateSetJac25.dummyVarStateSetJac25 ; valSouth2.8.port_b.p.$pDERStateSetJac25.dummyVarStateSetJac25 ; valSouth2.2.port_a.p.$pDERStateSetJac25.dummyVarStateSetJac25 ; valSouth2.4.port_b.p.$pDERStateSetJac25.dummyVarStateSetJac25 ] = [ -tabsSouth2.4.dp.$pDERStateSetJac25.dummyVarStateSetJac25 ; -valSouth2.4.dp.$pDERStateSetJac25.dummyVarStateSetJac25 ; -valSouth2.8.dp.$pDERStateSetJac25.dummyVarStateSetJac25 ; -tabsSouth2.8.dp.$pDERStateSetJac25.dummyVarStateSetJac25 ] might be structurally or numerically singular for variable valSouth2.4.port_b.p.$pDERStateSetJac25.dummyVarStateSetJac25 since U(4,4) = 0.0. It might be hard to solve. Compilation continues anyway. Warning: The linear system: 1 : tabsSouth1[4].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac25 + tabsSouth1[3].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac25 + tabsSouth1.2.m_flow.$pDERStateSetJac25.dummyVarStateSetJac25 + tabsSouth1.1.m_flow.$pDERStateSetJac25.dummyVarStateSetJac25 - pipSouth1.m_flow.$pDERStateSetJac25.dummyVarStateSetJac25 = 0.0 2 : spl1.res1.m_flow.$pDERStateSetJac25.dummyVarStateSetJac25 + valNorth.res3.m_flow.$pDERStateSetJac25.dummyVarStateSetJac25 + valSouth.res3.m_flow.$pDERStateSetJac25.dummyVarStateSetJac25 + (-tabsSouth1.1.m_flow.$pDERStateSetJac25.dummyVarStateSetJac25) - tabsSouth1.2.m_flow.$pDERStateSetJac25.dummyVarStateSetJac25 - tabsSouth1[3].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac25 - tabsSouth1[4].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac25 - tabsSouth2[1].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac25 - tabsSouth2[2].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac25 - tabsSouth2[3].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac25 - tabsSouth2[4].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac25 - tabsSouth2[5].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac25 - tabsSouth2[6].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac25 - tabsSouth2[7].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac25 - tabsSouth2[8].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac25 - tabsNorth1.1.m_flow.$pDERStateSetJac25.dummyVarStateSetJac25 - tabsNorth1[2].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac25 - tabsNorth1[3].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac25 - tabsNorth1[4].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac25 - tabsNorth2[1].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac25 - tabsNorth2[2].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac25 - tabsNorth2[3].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac25 - tabsNorth2[4].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac25 - tabsNorth2[5].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac25 - tabsNorth2[6].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac25 - tabsNorth2[8].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac25 - $cse422.$pDERStateSetJac25.dummyVarStateSetJac25 - tabsNorth2[7].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac25 = 0.0 [ 1.0 , 1.0 ; -1.0 , -1.0 ] * [ tabsSouth1.2.m_flow.$pDERStateSetJac25.dummyVarStateSetJac25 ; tabsSouth1.1.m_flow.$pDERStateSetJac25.dummyVarStateSetJac25 ] = [ pipSouth1.m_flow.$pDERStateSetJac25.dummyVarStateSetJac25 + (-tabsSouth1[3].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac25) - tabsSouth1[4].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac25 ; tabsSouth1[3].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac25 + $cse422.$pDERStateSetJac25.dummyVarStateSetJac25 + tabsNorth2[7].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac25 + tabsNorth2[8].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac25 + tabsNorth2[6].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac25 + tabsNorth2[5].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac25 + tabsNorth2[4].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac25 + tabsNorth2[3].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac25 + tabsNorth2[2].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac25 + tabsNorth2[1].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac25 + tabsNorth1[4].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac25 + tabsNorth1[3].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac25 + tabsNorth1[2].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac25 + tabsNorth1.1.m_flow.$pDERStateSetJac25.dummyVarStateSetJac25 + tabsSouth2[8].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac25 + tabsSouth2[7].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac25 + tabsSouth2[6].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac25 + tabsSouth2[5].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac25 + tabsSouth2[4].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac25 + tabsSouth2[3].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac25 + tabsSouth2[2].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac25 + tabsSouth2[1].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac25 + tabsSouth1[4].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac25 + (-valNorth.res3.m_flow.$pDERStateSetJac25.dummyVarStateSetJac25) - spl1.res1.m_flow.$pDERStateSetJac25.dummyVarStateSetJac25 - valSouth.res3.m_flow.$pDERStateSetJac25.dummyVarStateSetJac25 ] might be structurally or numerically singular for variable tabsSouth1.1.m_flow.$pDERStateSetJac25.dummyVarStateSetJac25 since U(2,2) = 0.0. It might be hard to solve. Compilation continues anyway. Warning: The linear system: 1 : tabsSouth2.4.dp.$pDERStateSetJac25.dummyVarStateSetJac25 = valSouth2.4.port_b.p.$pDERStateSetJac25.dummyVarStateSetJac25 - tabsSouth1.1.port_b.p.$pDERStateSetJac25.dummyVarStateSetJac25 2 : valSouth2.4.dp.$pDERStateSetJac25.dummyVarStateSetJac25 = valSouth2.2.port_a.p.$pDERStateSetJac25.dummyVarStateSetJac25 - valSouth2.4.port_b.p.$pDERStateSetJac25.dummyVarStateSetJac25 3 : valSouth2.8.dp.$pDERStateSetJac25.dummyVarStateSetJac25 = valSouth2.2.port_a.p.$pDERStateSetJac25.dummyVarStateSetJac25 - valSouth2.8.port_b.p.$pDERStateSetJac25.dummyVarStateSetJac25 4 : tabsSouth2.8.dp.$pDERStateSetJac25.dummyVarStateSetJac25 = valSouth2.8.port_b.p.$pDERStateSetJac25.dummyVarStateSetJac25 - tabsSouth1.1.port_b.p.$pDERStateSetJac25.dummyVarStateSetJac25 [ 1.0 , 0.0 , 0.0 , -1.0 ; 0.0 , 0.0 , -1.0 , 1.0 ; 0.0 , 1.0 , -1.0 , 0.0 ; 1.0 , -1.0 , 0.0 , 0.0 ] * [ tabsSouth1.1.port_b.p.$pDERStateSetJac25.dummyVarStateSetJac25 ; valSouth2.8.port_b.p.$pDERStateSetJac25.dummyVarStateSetJac25 ; valSouth2.2.port_a.p.$pDERStateSetJac25.dummyVarStateSetJac25 ; valSouth2.4.port_b.p.$pDERStateSetJac25.dummyVarStateSetJac25 ] = [ -tabsSouth2.4.dp.$pDERStateSetJac25.dummyVarStateSetJac25 ; -valSouth2.4.dp.$pDERStateSetJac25.dummyVarStateSetJac25 ; -valSouth2.8.dp.$pDERStateSetJac25.dummyVarStateSetJac25 ; -tabsSouth2.8.dp.$pDERStateSetJac25.dummyVarStateSetJac25 ] might be structurally or numerically singular for variable valSouth2.4.port_b.p.$pDERStateSetJac25.dummyVarStateSetJac25 since U(4,4) = 0.0. It might be hard to solve. Compilation continues anyway. Warning: The linear system: 1 : tabsSouth1[4].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac25 + tabsSouth1[3].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac25 + tabsSouth1.2.m_flow.$pDERStateSetJac25.dummyVarStateSetJac25 + tabsSouth1.1.m_flow.$pDERStateSetJac25.dummyVarStateSetJac25 - pipSouth1.m_flow.$pDERStateSetJac25.dummyVarStateSetJac25 = 0.0 2 : spl1.res1.m_flow.$pDERStateSetJac25.dummyVarStateSetJac25 + valNorth.res3.m_flow.$pDERStateSetJac25.dummyVarStateSetJac25 + valSouth.res3.m_flow.$pDERStateSetJac25.dummyVarStateSetJac25 + (-tabsSouth1.1.m_flow.$pDERStateSetJac25.dummyVarStateSetJac25) - tabsSouth1.2.m_flow.$pDERStateSetJac25.dummyVarStateSetJac25 - tabsSouth1[3].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac25 - tabsSouth1[4].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac25 - tabsSouth2[1].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac25 - tabsSouth2[2].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac25 - tabsSouth2[3].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac25 - tabsSouth2[4].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac25 - tabsSouth2[5].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac25 - tabsSouth2[6].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac25 - tabsSouth2[7].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac25 - tabsSouth2[8].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac25 - tabsNorth1.1.m_flow.$pDERStateSetJac25.dummyVarStateSetJac25 - tabsNorth1[2].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac25 - tabsNorth1[3].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac25 - tabsNorth1[4].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac25 - tabsNorth2[1].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac25 - tabsNorth2[2].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac25 - tabsNorth2[3].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac25 - tabsNorth2[4].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac25 - tabsNorth2[5].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac25 - tabsNorth2[6].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac25 - tabsNorth2[8].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac25 - $cse422.$pDERStateSetJac25.dummyVarStateSetJac25 - tabsNorth2[7].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac25 = 0.0 [ 1.0 , 1.0 ; -1.0 , -1.0 ] * [ tabsSouth1.2.m_flow.$pDERStateSetJac25.dummyVarStateSetJac25 ; tabsSouth1.1.m_flow.$pDERStateSetJac25.dummyVarStateSetJac25 ] = [ pipSouth1.m_flow.$pDERStateSetJac25.dummyVarStateSetJac25 + (-tabsSouth1[3].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac25) - tabsSouth1[4].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac25 ; tabsSouth1[3].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac25 + $cse422.$pDERStateSetJac25.dummyVarStateSetJac25 + tabsNorth2[7].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac25 + tabsNorth2[8].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac25 + tabsNorth2[6].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac25 + tabsNorth2[5].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac25 + tabsNorth2[4].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac25 + tabsNorth2[3].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac25 + tabsNorth2[2].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac25 + tabsNorth2[1].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac25 + tabsNorth1[4].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac25 + tabsNorth1[3].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac25 + tabsNorth1[2].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac25 + tabsNorth1.1.m_flow.$pDERStateSetJac25.dummyVarStateSetJac25 + tabsSouth2[8].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac25 + tabsSouth2[7].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac25 + tabsSouth2[6].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac25 + tabsSouth2[5].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac25 + tabsSouth2[4].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac25 + tabsSouth2[3].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac25 + tabsSouth2[2].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac25 + tabsSouth2[1].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac25 + tabsSouth1[4].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac25 + (-valNorth.res3.m_flow.$pDERStateSetJac25.dummyVarStateSetJac25) - spl1.res1.m_flow.$pDERStateSetJac25.dummyVarStateSetJac25 - valSouth.res3.m_flow.$pDERStateSetJac25.dummyVarStateSetJac25 ] might be structurally or numerically singular for variable tabsSouth1.1.m_flow.$pDERStateSetJac25.dummyVarStateSetJac25 since U(2,2) = 0.0. It might be hard to solve. Compilation continues anyway. Notification: Performance of postOpt calculateStateSetsJacobians (simulation): time 0.04728/5.947, allocations: 32.9 MB / 2.149 GB, free: 149.4 MB / 0.8075 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt symbolicJacobian (simulation): time 0.128/6.075, allocations: 51.25 MB / 2.199 GB, free: 146.6 MB / 0.8075 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt removeConstants (simulation): time 0.01602/6.091, allocations: 5.039 MB / 2.204 GB, free: 145.9 MB / 0.8075 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyTimeIndepFuncCalls (simulation): time 0.007468/6.099, allocations: 190.1 kB / 2.204 GB, free: 145.9 MB / 0.8075 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyAllExpressions (simulation): time 0.03235/6.131, allocations: 2.244 MB / 2.206 GB, free: 144.1 MB / 0.8075 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt findZeroCrossings (simulation): time 0.006313/6.138, allocations: 1.336 MB / 2.208 GB, free: 144.1 MB / 0.8075 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt collapseArrayExpressions (simulation): time 0.004936/6.143, allocations: 0.8122 MB / 2.208 GB, free: 144.1 MB / 0.8075 GB Notification: Performance of sorting global known variables: time 0.009104/6.152, allocations: 6.718 MB / 2.215 GB, free: 140.8 MB / 0.8075 GB Notification: Performance of sort global known variables: time 1.7e-07/6.152, allocations: 0 / 2.215 GB, free: 140.8 MB / 0.8075 GB Notification: Performance of remove unused functions: time 0.06357/6.215, allocations: 31.79 MB / 2.246 GB, free: 109.6 MB / 0.8075 GB Notification: Model statistics after passing the back-end for simulation: * Number of independent subsystems: 5 * Number of states: 42 ($STATESET1.x[32],$STATESET1.x[31],$STATESET1.x[30],$STATESET1.x[29],$STATESET1.x[28],$STATESET1.x[27],$STATESET1.x[26],$STATESET1.x[25],$STATESET1.x[24],$STATESET1.x[23],$STATESET1.x[22],$STATESET1.x[21],$STATESET1.x[20],$STATESET1.x[19],$STATESET1.x[18],$STATESET1.x[17],$STATESET1.x[16],$STATESET1.x[15],$STATESET1.x[14],$STATESET1.x[13],$STATESET1.x[12],$STATESET1.x[11],$STATESET1.x[10],$STATESET1.x[9],$STATESET1.x[8],$STATESET1.x[7],$STATESET1.x[6],$STATESET1.x[5],$STATESET1.x[4],$STATESET1.x[3],$STATESET1.x[2],$STATESET1.x[1],pmpSouth.vol.dynBal.U,pmpNorth.vol.dynBal.U,valSouth.vol.dynBal.U,valNorth.vol.dynBal.U,spl.vol.dynBal.U,spl1.vol.dynBal.U,pumpHea.vol.dynBal.U,spl2.vol.dynBal.U,spl3.vol.dynBal.U,pumpCoo.vol.dynBal.U) * Number of discrete variables: 7 ($whenCondition2,$whenCondition1,stepPump.y,stepPump.pulseStart,pumpHea.stage,stepValve.T_start,stepValve.count) * Number of discrete states: 1 (stepValve.count) * Number of clocked states: 0 () * Top-level inputs: 0 Notification: Strong component statistics for simulation (541): * Single equations (assignments): 518 * Array equations: 0 * Algorithm blocks: 0 * Record equations: 10 * When equations: 3 * If-equations: 0 * Equation systems (not torn): 7 * Torn equation systems: 3 * Mixed (continuous/discrete) equation systems: 0 Notification: Equation system details (not torn): * Constant Jacobian (size): 0 systems * Linear Jacobian (size,density): 1 system {(189,1.5%)} * Non-linear Jacobian (size): 6 systems {1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1} * Without analytic Jacobian (size): 0 systems Notification: Torn system details for strict tearing set: * Linear torn systems (#iteration vars, #inner vars, density): 2 systems {(28,28,89.3%), (1,1,100.0%)} * Non-linear torn systems (#iteration vars, #inner vars): 1 system {(62,186)} Notification: Performance of Backend phase and start with SimCode phase: time 0.005035/6.22, allocations: 0.6315 MB / 2.247 GB, free: 109.2 MB / 0.8075 GB Notification: Performance of simCode: created initialization part: time 0.08539/6.306, allocations: 34.17 MB / 2.28 GB, free: 83.89 MB / 0.8075 GB Notification: Performance of simCode: created event and clocks part: time 8.095e-06/6.306, allocations: 4 kB / 2.28 GB, free: 83.89 MB / 0.8075 GB Notification: Performance of simCode: created simulation system equations: time 0.03463/6.34, allocations: 16.9 MB / 2.296 GB, free: 67.57 MB / 0.8075 GB Notification: Performance of simCode: created of all other equations (e.g. parameter, nominal, assert, etc): time 0.04832/6.389, allocations: 11.43 MB / 2.308 GB, free: 57.29 MB / 0.8075 GB Notification: Performance of simCode: created linear, non-linear and system jacobian parts: time 0.06508/6.454, allocations: 41.21 MB / 2.348 GB, free: 15.99 MB / 0.8075 GB Notification: Performance of simCode: some other stuff during SimCode phase: time 0.007552/6.461, allocations: 4.384 MB / 2.352 GB, free: 11.57 MB / 0.8075 GB Notification: Performance of simCode: alias equations: time 0.02339/6.485, allocations: 3.132 MB / 2.355 GB, free: 8.438 MB / 0.8075 GB Notification: Performance of simCode: all other stuff during SimCode phase: time 0.03728/6.522, allocations: 7.782 MB / 2.363 GB, free: 0.6445 MB / 0.8075 GB Notification: Performance of SimCode: time 2.855e-06/6.522, allocations: 0 / 2.363 GB, free: 0.6445 MB / 0.8075 GB Notification: Performance of Templates: time 1.773/8.295, allocations: 0.7596 GB / 3.122 GB, free: 126.9 MB / 0.8388 GB " [Timeout remaining time 652] make -j1 -f IDEAS_dev_IDEAS.Fluid.Examples.FlowSystem.Basic.makefile [Timeout 660] (rm -f IDEAS_dev_IDEAS.Fluid.Examples.FlowSystem.Basic.pipe ; mkfifo IDEAS_dev_IDEAS.Fluid.Examples.FlowSystem.Basic.pipe ; head -c 1048576 < IDEAS_dev_IDEAS.Fluid.Examples.FlowSystem.Basic.pipe >> ../files/IDEAS_dev_IDEAS.Fluid.Examples.FlowSystem.Basic.sim & ./IDEAS_dev_IDEAS.Fluid.Examples.FlowSystem.Basic -abortSlowSimulation -alarm=240 -lv LOG_STATS > IDEAS_dev_IDEAS.Fluid.Examples.FlowSystem.Basic.pipe 2>&1) [Timeout 240] [Calling os._exit(0), Time elapsed: 21.217757020145655]