Running: ./testmodel.py --libraries=/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries --ompython_omhome=/usr Buildings_latest_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.conf.json
loadFile("/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/ModelicaServices 4.1.0+maint.om/package.mo", uses=false) [Timeout 180]
"Notification: Performance of loadFile(/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/ModelicaServices 4.1.0+maint.om/package.mo): time 0.002426/0.002426, allocations: 85.48 kB / 19.44 MB, free: 344 kB / 13.93 MB
"
[Timeout remaining time 180]
loadFile("/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Complex 4.1.0+maint.om/package.mo", uses=false) [Timeout 180]
"Notification: Performance of loadFile(/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Complex 4.1.0+maint.om/package.mo): time 0.002962/0.002962, allocations: 173.2 kB / 22.76 MB, free: 1.664 MB / 18.57 MB
"
[Timeout remaining time 180]
loadFile("/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Modelica 4.1.0+maint.om/package.mo", uses=false) [Timeout 180]
"Notification: Performance of loadFile(/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Modelica 4.1.0+maint.om/package.mo): time 1.632/1.632, allocations: 177.1 MB / 203.1 MB, free: 5.609 MB / 186.7 MB
"
[Timeout remaining time 178]
loadFile("/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Buildings master/package.mo", uses=false) [Timeout 180]
"Notification: Performance of loadFile(/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Buildings master/package.mo): time 3.447/3.447, allocations: 429.5 MB / 0.6729 GB, free: 4.004 MB / 0.6355 GB
"
[Timeout remaining time 176]
Using package Buildings with version 14.0.0 (/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Buildings master/package.mo)
Using package Modelica with version 4.1.0 (/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Modelica 4.1.0+maint.om/package.mo)
Using package Complex with version 4.1.0 (/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Complex 4.1.0+maint.om/package.mo)
Using package ModelicaServices with version 4.1.0 (/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/ModelicaServices 4.1.0+maint.om/package.mo)
Running command: translateModel(Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU,tolerance=1e-06,outputFormat="mat",numberOfIntervals=2500,variableFilter="time|sla.sta_b.T|sla.surf_a.T|sla.surf_b.T|sla.surf_a.Q_flow|sla.surf_b.Q_flow",fileNamePrefix="Buildings_latest_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU")
translateModel(Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU,tolerance=1e-06,outputFormat="mat",numberOfIntervals=2500,variableFilter="time|sla.sta_b.T|sla.surf_a.T|sla.surf_b.T|sla.surf_a.Q_flow|sla.surf_b.Q_flow",fileNamePrefix="Buildings_latest_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU") [Timeout 300]
"Notification: Performance of FrontEnd - loaded program: time 2.725e-06/2.725e-06, allocations: 0 / 0.8775 GB, free: 6.605 MB / 0.8386 GB
Notification: Performance of FrontEnd - Absyn->SCode: time 3.379e-05/3.652e-05, allocations: 5.547 kB / 0.8775 GB, free: 6.602 MB / 0.8386 GB
Notification: Performance of NFInst.instantiate(Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU): time 0.04707/0.04711, allocations: 32.89 MB / 0.9096 GB, free: 5.648 MB / 0.8698 GB
Notification: Performance of NFInst.instExpressions: time 0.02769/0.07479, allocations: 13.38 MB / 0.9227 GB, free: 8.23 MB / 0.8855 GB
Notification: Performance of NFInst.updateImplicitVariability: time 0.004073/0.07887, allocations: 87.31 kB / 0.9227 GB, free: 8.145 MB / 0.8855 GB
Notification: Performance of NFTyping.typeComponents: time 0.004601/0.08347, allocations: 1.107 MB / 0.9238 GB, free: 7.031 MB / 0.8855 GB
Notification: Performance of NFTyping.typeBindings: time 0.009347/0.09281, allocations: 2.297 MB / 0.9261 GB, free: 4.723 MB / 0.8855 GB
Notification: Performance of NFTyping.typeClassSections: time 0.008781/0.1016, allocations: 2.219 MB / 0.9282 GB, free: 2.496 MB / 0.8855 GB
Notification: Performance of NFFlatten.flatten: time 0.03398/0.1356, allocations: 20.02 MB / 0.9478 GB, free: 14.43 MB / 0.9167 GB
Notification: Performance of NFFlatten.resolveConnections: time 0.01531/0.1509, allocations: 5.712 MB / 0.9534 GB, free: 8.652 MB / 0.9167 GB
Notification: Performance of NFEvalConstants.evaluate: time 0.03404/0.1849, allocations: 8.913 MB / 0.9621 GB, free: 15.76 MB / 0.9323 GB
Notification: Performance of NFSimplifyModel.simplify: time 0.01692/0.2018, allocations: 5.819 MB / 0.9677 GB, free: 9.926 MB / 0.9323 GB
Notification: Performance of NFPackage.collectConstants: time 0.00495/0.2068, allocations: 0.7344 MB / 0.9685 GB, free: 9.191 MB / 0.9323 GB
Notification: Performance of NFFlatten.collectFunctions: time 0.01249/0.2193, allocations: 2.552 MB / 0.971 GB, free: 6.637 MB / 0.9323 GB
Notification: Performance of NFScalarize.scalarize: time 0.01022/0.2295, allocations: 3.272 MB / 0.9742 GB, free: 3.355 MB / 0.9323 GB
Notification: Performance of NFVerifyModel.verify: time 0.01784/0.2473, allocations: 3.212 MB / 0.9773 GB, free: 140 kB / 0.9323 GB
Notification: Performance of NFConvertDAE.convert: time 0.03676/0.2841, allocations: 15.52 MB / 0.9924 GB, free: 0.5742 MB / 0.948 GB
Notification: Performance of FrontEnd - DAE generated: time 1.607e-05/0.2841, allocations: 0 / 0.9924 GB, free: 0.5742 MB / 0.948 GB
Notification: Performance of FrontEnd: time 4.117e-06/0.2841, allocations: 0 / 0.9924 GB, free: 0.5742 MB / 0.948 GB
Notification: Performance of Transformations before backend: time 0.0008742/0.285, allocations: 0 / 0.9924 GB, free: 0.5742 MB / 0.948 GB
Notification: Model statistics after passing the front-end and creating the data structures used by the back-end:
 * Number of equations: 866
 * Number of variables: 866
Notification: Performance of Generate backend data structure: time 0.05319/0.3382, allocations: 12.87 MB / 1.005 GB, free: 3.598 MB / 0.9636 GB
Notification: Performance of prepare preOptimizeDAE: time 7.879e-05/0.3383, allocations: 16.03 kB / 1.005 GB, free: 3.582 MB / 0.9636 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt normalInlineFunction (simulation): time 0.008944/0.3472, allocations: 1.224 MB / 1.006 GB, free: 2.352 MB / 0.9636 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt evaluateParameters (simulation): time 0.03236/0.3796, allocations: 8.591 MB / 1.015 GB, free: 9.668 MB / 0.9792 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt simplifyIfEquations (simulation): time 0.0006185/0.3802, allocations: 334.8 kB / 1.015 GB, free: 9.34 MB / 0.9792 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt expandDerOperator (simulation): time 0.003275/0.3835, allocations: 491.8 kB / 1.015 GB, free: 8.859 MB / 0.9792 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt clockPartitioning (simulation): time 0.01898/0.4024, allocations: 5.112 MB / 1.02 GB, free: 3.34 MB / 0.9792 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt findStateOrder (simulation): time 0.0002506/0.4027, allocations: 15.92 kB / 1.02 GB, free: 3.324 MB / 0.9792 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt replaceEdgeChange (simulation): time 0.001603/0.4043, allocations: 144 kB / 1.021 GB, free: 3.184 MB / 0.9792 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt inlineArrayEqn (simulation): time 0.0001875/0.4045, allocations: 99.88 kB / 1.021 GB, free: 3.086 MB / 0.9792 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt removeEqualRHS (simulation): time 0.01074/0.4152, allocations: 2.803 MB / 1.023 GB, free: 280 kB / 0.9792 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt removeSimpleEquations (simulation): time 0.8889/1.304, allocations: 37.26 MB / 1.06 GB, free: 190 MB / 1.01 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt comSubExp (simulation): time 0.01064/1.315, allocations: 3.868 MB / 1.064 GB, free: 189.8 MB / 1.01 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt resolveLoops (simulation): time 0.003151/1.318, allocations: 1.421 MB / 1.065 GB, free: 189.4 MB / 1.01 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt evalFunc (simulation): time 0.02759/1.346, allocations: 8.438 MB / 1.073 GB, free: 186.4 MB / 1.01 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt encapsulateWhenConditions (simulation): time 0.003262/1.349, allocations: 1.692 MB / 1.075 GB, free: 185.5 MB / 1.01 GB
Notification: Performance of pre-optimization done (n=219): time 8.436e-06/1.349, allocations: 0 / 1.075 GB, free: 185.5 MB / 1.01 GB
Notification: Performance of matching and sorting (n=227): time 0.03364/1.382, allocations: 8.924 MB / 1.084 GB, free: 181.3 MB / 1.01 GB
Notification: Performance of inlineWhenForInitialization (initialization): time 0.0001083/1.383, allocations: 135.6 kB / 1.084 GB, free: 181.1 MB / 1.01 GB
Notification: Performance of selectInitializationVariablesDAE (initialization): time 0.04096/1.423, allocations: 12.61 MB / 1.096 GB, free: 176.5 MB / 1.01 GB
Notification: Performance of collectPreVariables (initialization): time 0.001636/1.425, allocations: 119.7 kB / 1.096 GB, free: 176.4 MB / 1.01 GB
Notification: Performance of collectInitialEqns (initialization): time 0.009268/1.434, allocations: 4.442 MB / 1.1 GB, free: 173.5 MB / 1.01 GB
Notification: Performance of collectInitialBindings (initialization): time 0.003284/1.438, allocations: 1.028 MB / 1.101 GB, free: 172.8 MB / 1.01 GB
Notification: Performance of simplifyInitialFunctions (initialization): time 0.00775/1.445, allocations: 1.797 MB / 1.103 GB, free: 172 MB / 1.01 GB
Notification: Performance of setup shared object (initialization): time 0.0001514/1.446, allocations: 479.5 kB / 1.104 GB, free: 171.5 MB / 1.01 GB
Notification: Performance of preBalanceInitialSystem (initialization): time 0.005613/1.451, allocations: 1.359 MB / 1.105 GB, free: 171.1 MB / 1.01 GB
Notification: Performance of partitionIndependentBlocks (initialization): time 0.008997/1.46, allocations: 5.486 MB / 1.11 GB, free: 165.5 MB / 1.01 GB
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3]))
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3]))
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3]))
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]))
Notification: Performance of analyzeInitialSystem (initialization): time 0.05494/1.515, allocations: 20.5 MB / 1.13 GB, free: 156 MB / 1.01 GB
Notification: Performance of solveInitialSystemEqSystem (initialization): time 0.000241/1.515, allocations: 33.59 kB / 1.13 GB, free: 156 MB / 1.01 GB
Notification: Performance of matching and sorting (n=663) (initialization): time 0.01821/1.534, allocations: 6.079 MB / 1.136 GB, free: 153.6 MB / 1.01 GB
Notification: Performance of prepare postOptimizeDAE: time 0.0001098/1.534, allocations: 68.48 kB / 1.136 GB, free: 153.6 MB / 1.01 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyComplexFunction (initialization): time 0.0001654/1.534, allocations: 84.5 kB / 1.136 GB, free: 153.6 MB / 1.01 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt tearingSystem (initialization): time 0.002398/1.536, allocations: 0.5713 MB / 1.137 GB, free: 153.4 MB / 1.01 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt solveSimpleEquations (initialization): time 0.005356/1.542, allocations: 1.482 MB / 1.138 GB, free: 153.3 MB / 1.01 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt calculateStrongComponentJacobians (initialization): time 0.008421/1.55, allocations: 14.37 MB / 1.153 GB, free: 139.8 MB / 1.01 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyAllExpressions (initialization): time 0.01158/1.562, allocations: 1.173 MB / 1.154 GB, free: 139.7 MB / 1.01 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt collapseArrayExpressions (initialization): time 0.001572/1.563, allocations: 277.1 kB / 1.154 GB, free: 139.7 MB / 1.01 GB
Warning: The initial conditions are over specified. The following 8 initial equations are redundant, so they are removed from the initialization system:
         sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start
         sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start
         sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start
         sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start
         sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3])
         sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3])
         sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3])
         sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]).
Notification: Performance of preBalanceInitialSystem (initialization_lambda0): time 0.01067/1.574, allocations: 3.557 MB / 1.157 GB, free: 137.2 MB / 1.01 GB
Notification: Performance of partitionIndependentBlocks (initialization_lambda0): time 0.006064/1.58, allocations: 5.483 MB / 1.163 GB, free: 130.4 MB / 1.01 GB
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3]))
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3]))
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3]))
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]))
Notification: Performance of analyzeInitialSystem (initialization_lambda0): time 0.03543/1.615, allocations: 20.43 MB / 1.183 GB, free: 108.3 MB / 1.01 GB
Notification: Performance of solveInitialSystemEqSystem (initialization_lambda0): time 0.0001351/1.615, allocations: 24 kB / 1.183 GB, free: 108.2 MB / 1.01 GB
Notification: Performance of matching and sorting (n=663) (initialization_lambda0): time 0.01576/1.631, allocations: 6.08 MB / 1.189 GB, free: 102.1 MB / 1.01 GB
Notification: Performance of prepare postOptimizeDAE: time 9.897e-05/1.631, allocations: 69.7 kB / 1.189 GB, free: 102 MB / 1.01 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyComplexFunction (initialization): time 0.0001292/1.631, allocations: 87.31 kB / 1.189 GB, free: 101.9 MB / 1.01 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt tearingSystem (initialization): time 0.002039/1.633, allocations: 0.579 MB / 1.189 GB, free: 101.3 MB / 1.01 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt solveSimpleEquations (initialization): time 0.005333/1.639, allocations: 1.475 MB / 1.191 GB, free: 99.82 MB / 1.01 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt calculateStrongComponentJacobians (initialization): time 0.008414/1.647, allocations: 14.37 MB / 1.205 GB, free: 84.62 MB / 1.01 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyAllExpressions (initialization): time 0.01138/1.659, allocations: 1.176 MB / 1.206 GB, free: 83.44 MB / 1.01 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt collapseArrayExpressions (initialization): time 0.001527/1.66, allocations: 280 kB / 1.206 GB, free: 83.17 MB / 1.01 GB
Warning: The initial conditions are over specified. The following 8 initial equations are redundant, so they are removed from the initialization_lambda0 system:
         sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start
         sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start
         sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start
         sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start
         sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3])
         sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3])
         sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3])
         sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]).
Notification: Model statistics after passing the back-end for initialization:
 * Number of independent subsystems: 393
 * Number of states: 0 ()
 * Number of discrete variables: 5 ($PRE.pulse.count,$PRE.pulse.T_start,pulse.count,pulse.T_start,$whenCondition1)
 * Number of discrete states: 0 ()
 * Number of clocked states: 0 ()
 * Top-level inputs: 0
Notification: Strong component statistics for initialization (639):
 * Single equations (assignments): 631
 * Array equations: 0
 * Algorithm blocks: 1
 * Record equations: 0
 * When equations: 0
 * If-equations: 0
 * Equation systems (not torn): 0
 * Torn equation systems: 7
 * Mixed (continuous/discrete) equation systems: 0
Notification: Torn system details for strict tearing set:
 * Linear torn systems (#iteration vars, #inner vars, density): 7 systems
   {(1,9,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,9,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%)}
 * Non-linear torn systems (#iteration vars, #inner vars): 0 systems
Notification: Performance of prepare postOptimizeDAE: time 0.002222/1.662, allocations: 0.8509 MB / 1.207 GB, free: 82.37 MB / 1.01 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt lateInlineFunction (simulation): time 0.00348/1.666, allocations: 0.7542 MB / 1.208 GB, free: 81.61 MB / 1.01 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt wrapFunctionCalls (simulation): time 0.006483/1.672, allocations: 2.874 MB / 1.211 GB, free: 78.71 MB / 1.01 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt inlineArrayEqn (simulation): time 2.27e-05/1.672, allocations: 24 kB / 1.211 GB, free: 78.69 MB / 1.01 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt constantLinearSystem (simulation): time 1.114e-05/1.672, allocations: 4 kB / 1.211 GB, free: 78.69 MB / 1.01 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifysemiLinear (simulation): time 0.003144/1.676, allocations: 1.788 MB / 1.212 GB, free: 76.86 MB / 1.01 GB
Warning: The model contains alias variables with redundant start and/or conflicting nominal values. It is recommended to resolve the conflicts, because otherwise the system could be hard to solve. To print the conflicting alias sets and the chosen candidates please use -d=aliasConflicts.
Notification: Performance of postOpt removeSimpleEquations (simulation): time 0.03072/1.706, allocations: 11.12 MB / 1.223 GB, free: 65.66 MB / 1.01 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyComplexFunction (simulation): time 1.928e-05/1.706, allocations: 7.938 kB / 1.223 GB, free: 65.65 MB / 1.01 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt solveSimpleEquations (simulation): time 0.00257/1.709, allocations: 0.5812 MB / 1.224 GB, free: 65.07 MB / 1.01 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt tearingSystem (simulation): time 0.002139/1.711, allocations: 462.7 kB / 1.224 GB, free: 64.59 MB / 1.01 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt inputDerivativesUsed (simulation): time 0.0004528/1.711, allocations: 123.9 kB / 1.224 GB, free: 64.47 MB / 1.01 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt calculateStrongComponentJacobians (simulation): time 0.008217/1.72, allocations: 14.22 MB / 1.238 GB, free: 49.41 MB / 1.01 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt calculateStateSetsJacobians (simulation): time 5.49e-06/1.72, allocations: 4 kB / 1.238 GB, free: 49.41 MB / 1.01 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt symbolicJacobian (simulation): time 0.01078/1.73, allocations: 3.987 MB / 1.242 GB, free: 45.32 MB / 1.01 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt removeConstants (simulation): time 0.007277/1.738, allocations: 1.43 MB / 1.244 GB, free: 43.88 MB / 1.01 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyTimeIndepFuncCalls (simulation): time 0.003503/1.741, allocations: 118.8 kB / 1.244 GB, free: 43.77 MB / 1.01 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyAllExpressions (simulation): time 0.007122/1.748, allocations: 0.6044 MB / 1.244 GB, free: 43.16 MB / 1.01 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt findZeroCrossings (simulation): time 0.0006255/1.749, allocations: 165.7 kB / 1.244 GB, free: 43 MB / 1.01 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt collapseArrayExpressions (simulation): time 0.0003427/1.749, allocations: 83.89 kB / 1.245 GB, free: 42.92 MB / 1.01 GB
Notification: Performance of sorting global known variables: time 0.01773/1.767, allocations: 6.473 MB / 1.251 GB, free: 36.46 MB / 1.01 GB
Notification: Performance of sort global known variables: time 2.71e-07/1.767, allocations: 4 kB / 1.251 GB, free: 36.45 MB / 1.01 GB
Notification: Performance of remove unused functions: time 0.02478/1.792, allocations: 3.978 MB / 1.255 GB, free: 32.52 MB / 1.01 GB
Notification: Model statistics after passing the back-end for simulation:
 * Number of independent subsystems: 12
 * Number of states: 43 (sla.vol[1].dynBal.U,sla.vol[2].dynBal.U,sla.vol[3].dynBal.U,sla.vol[4].dynBal.U,sla.vol[5].dynBal.U,sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_b[1].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[2].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[3].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[4].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[5].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T[3],TOut.T)
 * Number of discrete variables: 3 ($whenCondition1,pulse.T_start,pulse.count)
 * Number of discrete states: 1 (pulse.count)
 * Number of clocked states: 0 ()
 * Top-level inputs: 0
Notification: Strong component statistics for simulation (205):
 * Single equations (assignments): 194
 * Array equations: 0
 * Algorithm blocks: 0
 * Record equations: 2
 * When equations: 2
 * If-equations: 0
 * Equation systems (not torn): 0
 * Torn equation systems: 7
 * Mixed (continuous/discrete) equation systems: 0
Notification: Torn system details for strict tearing set:
 * Linear torn systems (#iteration vars, #inner vars, density): 7 systems
   {(1,9,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,9,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%)}
 * Non-linear torn systems (#iteration vars, #inner vars): 0 systems
Notification: Performance of Backend phase and start with SimCode phase: time 0.002695/1.794, allocations: 0.6087 MB / 1.255 GB, free: 31.97 MB / 1.01 GB
Notification: Performance of simCode: created initialization part: time 0.02282/1.817, allocations: 10.28 MB / 1.265 GB, free: 21.42 MB / 1.01 GB
Notification: Performance of simCode: created event and clocks part: time 1.564e-05/1.817, allocations: 4 kB / 1.265 GB, free: 21.42 MB / 1.01 GB
Notification: Performance of simCode: created simulation system equations: time 0.004301/1.822, allocations: 2.535 MB / 1.268 GB, free: 18.75 MB / 1.01 GB
Notification: Performance of simCode: created of all other equations (e.g. parameter, nominal, assert, etc): time 0.02195/1.844, allocations: 2.716 MB / 1.271 GB, free: 16.09 MB / 1.01 GB
Notification: Performance of simCode: created linear, non-linear and system jacobian parts: time 0.03606/1.88, allocations: 15.01 MB / 1.285 GB, free: 0.9961 MB / 1.01 GB
Notification: Performance of simCode: some other stuff during SimCode phase: time 0.01118/1.891, allocations: 4.07 MB / 1.289 GB, free: 12.89 MB / 1.026 GB
Notification: Performance of simCode: alias equations: time 0.01882/1.91, allocations: 5.38 MB / 1.294 GB, free: 7.516 MB / 1.026 GB
Notification: Performance of simCode: all other stuff during SimCode phase: time 0.003662/1.913, allocations: 412.5 kB / 1.295 GB, free: 7.113 MB / 1.026 GB
Notification: Performance of SimCode: time 1.864e-06/1.913, allocations: 0 / 1.295 GB, free: 7.113 MB / 1.026 GB
Notification: Performance of Templates: time 0.2752/2.188, allocations: 134.8 MB / 1.426 GB, free: 2.379 MB / 1.151 GB
"
[Timeout remaining time 298]
make -j1 -f Buildings_latest_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.makefile [Timeout 300]
(rm -f Buildings_latest_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.pipe ; mkfifo Buildings_latest_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.pipe ; head -c 1048576 < Buildings_latest_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.pipe >> ../files/Buildings_latest_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.sim & ./Buildings_latest_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU -abortSlowSimulation -alarm=240  -emit_protected -lv LOG_STATS > Buildings_latest_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.pipe 2>&1) [Timeout 240]
diffSimulationResults("Buildings_latest_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU_res.mat","/mnt/ReferenceFiles/Buildings/csv/master/Buildings_Fluid_HeatExchangers_RadiantSlabs_Examples_StepResponseEpsilonNTU.csv","/var/lib/jenkins/ws/OpenModelicaLibraryTestingWork/OpenModelicaLibraryTesting/files/Buildings_latest_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.diff",relTol=0.003,relTolDiffMinMax=0.003,rangeDelta=0.001) [Timeout 300]
""
[Timeout remaining time 300]
Reference file matches
[Calling sys.exit(0), Time elapsed: 14.90884792606812]