Running: ./testmodel.py --libraries=/var/lib/jenkins/ws/OpenModelicaLibraryTestingWork/OpenModelica/./OMCompiler/build/lib/omlibrary/ --ompython_omhome=/usr Buildings_6.0.0_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference.conf.json
Using package Buildings with version 6.0.0 (/var/lib/jenkins/ws/OpenModelicaLibraryTestingWork/OpenModelica/OMCompiler/build/lib/omlibrary/Buildings 6.0.0/package.mo)
Using package Modelica with version 3.2.2 (/var/lib/jenkins/ws/OpenModelicaLibraryTestingWork/OpenModelica/OMCompiler/build/lib/omlibrary/Modelica 3.2.2/package.mo)
Using package Complex with version 3.2.2 (/var/lib/jenkins/ws/OpenModelicaLibraryTestingWork/OpenModelica/OMCompiler/build/lib/omlibrary/Complex 3.2.2.mo)
Using package ModelicaServices with version 3.2.2 (/var/lib/jenkins/ws/OpenModelicaLibraryTestingWork/OpenModelica/OMCompiler/build/lib/omlibrary/ModelicaServices 3.2.2/package.mo)
Running command: translateModel(Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference,tolerance=1e-06,outputFormat="empty",numberOfIntervals=5000,variableFilter="",fileNamePrefix="Buildings_6.0.0_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference")
Notification: Performance of loadFile(/var/lib/jenkins/ws/OpenModelicaLibraryTestingWork/OpenModelica/OMCompiler/build/lib/omlibrary/ModelicaServices 3.2.2/package.mo): time 0.004356/0.004356, allocations: 231.1 kB / 15.82 MB, free: 6.293 MB / 13.93 MB
Notification: Performance of loadFile(/var/lib/jenkins/ws/OpenModelicaLibraryTestingWork/OpenModelica/OMCompiler/build/lib/omlibrary/Complex 3.2.2.mo): time 0.001238/0.001238, allocations: 174.3 kB / 16.7 MB, free: 5.449 MB / 13.93 MB
Notification: Performance of loadFile(/var/lib/jenkins/ws/OpenModelicaLibraryTestingWork/OpenModelica/OMCompiler/build/lib/omlibrary/Modelica 3.2.2/package.mo): time 3.838/3.838, allocations: 389.1 MB / 406.5 MB, free: 11.84 MB / 330.7 MB
Notification: Performance of loadFile(/var/lib/jenkins/ws/OpenModelicaLibraryTestingWork/OpenModelica/OMCompiler/build/lib/omlibrary/Buildings 6.0.0/package.mo): time 3.673/3.673, allocations: 472.3 MB / 0.9024 GB, free: 18.75 MB / 442.7 MB
Notification: Performance of FrontEnd - loaded program: time 0.0004654/0.0004655, allocations: 12.22 kB / 1.008 GB, free: 13.36 MB / 490.7 MB
Notification: Performance of FrontEnd - Absyn->SCode: time 0.2073/0.2078, allocations: 98.71 MB / 1.105 GB, free: 10.69 MB / 0.573 GB
Notification: Performance of FrontEnd - scodeFlatten: time 1.775/1.982, allocations: 446 MB / 1.54 GB, free: 217.4 MB / 0.823 GB
Notification: Performance of FrontEnd - mkProgramGraph: time 0.0003416/1.983, allocations: 115.4 kB / 1.54 GB, free: 217.4 MB / 0.823 GB
Notification: Performance of FrontEnd - DAE generated: time 9.254/11.24, allocations: 1.47 GB / 3.01 GB, free: 8.164 MB / 0.8386 GB
Notification: Performance of FrontEnd: time 2.244e-06/11.24, allocations: 0 / 3.01 GB, free: 8.164 MB / 0.8386 GB
Notification: Performance of Transformations before backend: time 0.002145/11.24, allocations: 167.8 kB / 3.01 GB, free: 8 MB / 0.8386 GB
Notification: Model statistics after passing the front-end and creating the data structures used by the back-end:
 * Number of equations: 831
 * Number of variables: 831
Notification: Performance of Generate backend data structure: time 0.0594/11.3, allocations: 11.86 MB / 3.022 GB, free: 12.03 MB / 0.8542 GB
Notification: Performance of prepare preOptimizeDAE: time 4.577e-05/11.3, allocations: 8.75 kB / 3.022 GB, free: 12.02 MB / 0.8542 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt normalInlineFunction (simulation): time 0.007635/11.31, allocations: 0.8533 MB / 3.022 GB, free: 11.16 MB / 0.8542 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt evaluateParameters (simulation): time 0.7074/12.01, allocations: 22.31 MB / 3.044 GB, free: 126.7 MB / 0.8542 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt simplifyIfEquations (simulation): time 0.0005374/12.01, allocations: 334.8 kB / 3.045 GB, free: 126.7 MB / 0.8542 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt expandDerOperator (simulation): time 0.002529/12.02, allocations: 478 kB / 3.045 GB, free: 126.7 MB / 0.8542 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt clockPartitioning (simulation): time 0.01683/12.03, allocations: 5.404 MB / 3.05 GB, free: 126.1 MB / 0.8542 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt findStateOrder (simulation): time 0.0001526/12.03, allocations: 15.95 kB / 3.05 GB, free: 126.1 MB / 0.8542 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt replaceEdgeChange (simulation): time 0.0007985/12.03, allocations: 141.2 kB / 3.05 GB, free: 126.1 MB / 0.8542 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt inlineArrayEqn (simulation): time 0.0001277/12.03, allocations: 92.44 kB / 3.05 GB, free: 126.1 MB / 0.8542 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt removeEqualRHS (simulation): time 0.01313/12.05, allocations: 4.339 MB / 3.055 GB, free: 126 MB / 0.8542 GB
Warning: The model contains alias variables with redundant start and/or conflicting nominal values. It is recommended to resolve the conflicts, because otherwise the system could be hard to solve. To print the conflicting alias sets and the chosen candidates please use -d=aliasConflicts.
Notification: Performance of preOpt removeSimpleEquations (simulation): time 0.0737/12.12, allocations: 29.61 MB / 3.084 GB, free: 117.8 MB / 0.8542 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt comSubExp (simulation): time 0.0192/12.14, allocations: 5.731 MB / 3.089 GB, free: 117.2 MB / 0.8542 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt resolveLoops (simulation): time 0.006809/12.15, allocations: 2.378 MB / 3.092 GB, free: 117.2 MB / 0.8542 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt evalFunc (simulation): time 0.04143/12.19, allocations: 13.87 MB / 3.105 GB, free: 114.3 MB / 0.8542 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt encapsulateWhenConditions (simulation): time 0.005108/12.19, allocations: 1.933 MB / 3.107 GB, free: 114.2 MB / 0.8542 GB
Notification: Performance of pre-optimization done (n=212): time 6.462e-06/12.19, allocations: 0 / 3.107 GB, free: 114.2 MB / 0.8542 GB
Notification: Performance of matching and sorting (n=220): time 0.0427/12.24, allocations: 12.32 MB / 3.119 GB, free: 111.4 MB / 0.8542 GB
Notification: Performance of inlineWhenForInitialization (initialization): time 6.519e-05/12.24, allocations: 102 kB / 3.119 GB, free: 111.3 MB / 0.8542 GB
Notification: Performance of selectInitializationVariablesDAE (initialization): time 0.03191/12.27, allocations: 11.47 MB / 3.13 GB, free: 110.8 MB / 0.8542 GB
Notification: Performance of collectPreVariables (initialization): time 0.001267/12.27, allocations: 120.5 kB / 3.13 GB, free: 110.8 MB / 0.8542 GB
Notification: Performance of collectInitialEqns (initialization): time 0.006769/12.28, allocations: 3.223 MB / 3.134 GB, free: 110.2 MB / 0.8542 GB
Notification: Performance of collectInitialBindings (initialization): time 0.002332/12.28, allocations: 0.8202 MB / 3.134 GB, free: 109.8 MB / 0.8542 GB
Notification: Performance of simplifyInitialFunctions (initialization): time 0.0009718/12.28, allocations: 101.7 kB / 3.134 GB, free: 109.8 MB / 0.8542 GB
Notification: Performance of setup shared object (initialization): time 0.0007448/12.28, allocations: 0.5239 MB / 3.135 GB, free: 109.5 MB / 0.8542 GB
Notification: Performance of preBalanceInitialSystem (initialization): time 0.007909/12.29, allocations: 3.055 MB / 3.138 GB, free: 109.5 MB / 0.8542 GB
Notification: Performance of partitionIndependentBlocks (initialization): time 0.0108/12.3, allocations: 6.123 MB / 3.144 GB, free: 106.1 MB / 0.8542 GB
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[2] = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2]) = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2]))
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[2] = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2]) = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2]))
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[2] = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2]) = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2]))
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[2] = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2]) = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2]))
Notification: Performance of analyzeInitialSystem (initialization): time 0.07512/12.38, allocations: 26.08 MB / 3.169 GB, free: 102 MB / 0.8542 GB
Notification: Performance of solveInitialSystemEqSystem (initialization): time 9.567e-05/12.38, allocations: 25.06 kB / 3.169 GB, free: 102 MB / 0.8542 GB
Error: Internal error IndexReduction.pantelidesIndexReduction failed! System is structurally singular and cannot be handled because the number of unassigned equations is larger than the number of states. Use -d=bltdump to get more information.
Error: No system for the symbolic initialization was generated