Running: ./testmodel.py --libraries=/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries --ompython_omhome=/usr Buildings_9_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference.conf.json loadFile("/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/ModelicaServices 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo", uses=false) loadFile("/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Complex 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo", uses=false) loadFile("/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Modelica 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo", uses=false) loadFile("/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Buildings 9.1.3-maint.9.1.x/package.mo", uses=false) Using package Buildings with version 9.1.3 (/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Buildings 9.1.3-maint.9.1.x/package.mo) Using package Modelica with version 4.0.0 (/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Modelica 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo) Using package Complex with version 4.0.0 (/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Complex 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo) Using package ModelicaServices with version 4.0.0 (/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/ModelicaServices 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo) Running command: translateModel(Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference,tolerance=1e-06,outputFormat="mat",numberOfIntervals=5000,variableFilter="time|sla.sta_b.T|sla.surf_a.T|sla.surf_b.T|sla.surf_a.Q_flow|sla.surf_b.Q_flow",fileNamePrefix="Buildings_9_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference") translateModel(Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference,tolerance=1e-06,outputFormat="mat",numberOfIntervals=5000,variableFilter="time|sla.sta_b.T|sla.surf_a.T|sla.surf_b.T|sla.surf_a.Q_flow|sla.surf_b.Q_flow",fileNamePrefix="Buildings_9_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference") Notification: Performance of loadFile(/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/ModelicaServices 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo): time 0.001575/0.001575, allocations: 116.4 kB / 16.42 MB, free: 6.496 MB / 14.72 MB Notification: Performance of loadFile(/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Complex 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo): time 0.001512/0.001512, allocations: 187.9 kB / 17.35 MB, free: 5.762 MB / 14.72 MB Notification: Performance of loadFile(/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Modelica 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo): time 1.315/1.315, allocations: 222.9 MB / 241.1 MB, free: 15.15 MB / 206.1 MB Notification: Performance of loadFile(/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Buildings 9.1.3-maint.9.1.x/package.mo): time 2.171/2.171, allocations: 390.3 MB / 0.6655 GB, free: 0.6094 MB / 0.5294 GB Notification: Performance of FrontEnd - loaded program: time 0.001469/0.001469, allocations: 63.91 kB / 0.9516 GB, free: 7.617 MB / 0.7325 GB Notification: Performance of FrontEnd - Absyn->SCode: time 0.8027/0.8041, allocations: 140.4 MB / 1.089 GB, free: 5.504 MB / 0.8575 GB Notification: Performance of NFInst.instantiate(Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference): time 0.03429/0.8385, allocations: 31.76 MB / 1.12 GB, free: 14.78 MB / 0.8887 GB Notification: Performance of NFInst.instExpressions: time 0.01953/0.858, allocations: 12.28 MB / 1.132 GB, free: 6.086 MB / 0.8887 GB Notification: Performance of NFInst.updateImplicitVariability: time 0.002804/0.8609, allocations: 63.75 kB / 1.132 GB, free: 6.062 MB / 0.8887 GB Notification: Performance of NFTyping.typeComponents: time 0.003519/0.8644, allocations: 1.119 MB / 1.133 GB, free: 5.465 MB / 0.8887 GB Notification: Performance of NFTyping.typeBindings: time 0.006763/0.8713, allocations: 2.158 MB / 1.135 GB, free: 4.207 MB / 0.8887 GB Notification: Performance of NFTyping.typeClassSections: time 0.005977/0.8772, allocations: 1.867 MB / 1.137 GB, free: 3.277 MB / 0.8887 GB Notification: Performance of NFFlatten.flatten: time 0.02513/0.9024, allocations: 19.58 MB / 1.156 GB, free: 11.08 MB / 0.9044 GB Notification: Performance of NFFlatten.resolveConnections: time 0.01096/0.9134, allocations: 7.202 MB / 1.163 GB, free: 7.766 MB / 0.9044 GB Notification: Performance of NFEvalConstants.evaluate: time 0.01286/0.9263, allocations: 6.54 MB / 1.169 GB, free: 4.445 MB / 0.9044 GB Notification: Performance of NFSimplifyModel.simplify: time 0.01003/0.9363, allocations: 5.343 MB / 1.175 GB, free: 1.234 MB / 0.9044 GB Notification: Performance of NFPackage.collectConstants: time 0.0029/0.9393, allocations: 0.7493 MB / 1.175 GB, free: 1.234 MB / 0.9044 GB Notification: Performance of NFFlatten.collectFunctions: time 0.01201/0.9513, allocations: 3.225 MB / 1.178 GB, free: 15.77 MB / 0.92 GB Notification: Performance of NFScalarize.scalarize: time 0.00573/0.957, allocations: 2.996 MB / 1.181 GB, free: 13.71 MB / 0.92 GB Notification: Performance of NFVerifyModel.verify: time 0.01167/0.9687, allocations: 4.751 MB / 1.186 GB, free: 10.42 MB / 0.92 GB Notification: Performance of NFConvertDAE.convert: time 0.02/0.9888, allocations: 15.44 MB / 1.201 GB, free: 10.94 MB / 0.9356 GB Notification: Performance of FrontEnd - DAE generated: time 7.244e-06/0.9888, allocations: 0 / 1.201 GB, free: 10.94 MB / 0.9356 GB Notification: Performance of FrontEnd: time 2.384e-06/0.9888, allocations: 0 / 1.201 GB, free: 10.94 MB / 0.9356 GB Notification: Performance of Transformations before backend: time 0.0004282/0.9893, allocations: 0 / 1.201 GB, free: 10.94 MB / 0.9356 GB Notification: Model statistics after passing the front-end and creating the data structures used by the back-end: * Number of equations: 866 * Number of variables: 866 Notification: Performance of Generate backend data structure: time 0.02817/1.017, allocations: 11.5 MB / 1.212 GB, free: 15.33 MB / 0.9512 GB Notification: Performance of prepare preOptimizeDAE: time 4.264e-05/1.017, allocations: 8.031 kB / 1.212 GB, free: 15.32 MB / 0.9512 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt normalInlineFunction (simulation): time 0.003283/1.021, allocations: 0.8803 MB / 1.213 GB, free: 14.43 MB / 0.9512 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt evaluateParameters (simulation): time 0.02064/1.041, allocations: 9.613 MB / 1.223 GB, free: 4.742 MB / 0.9512 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt simplifyIfEquations (simulation): time 0.0003244/1.042, allocations: 334.8 kB / 1.223 GB, free: 4.414 MB / 0.9512 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt expandDerOperator (simulation): time 0.001473/1.043, allocations: 479.8 kB / 1.223 GB, free: 3.945 MB / 0.9512 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt clockPartitioning (simulation): time 0.01061/1.054, allocations: 5.96 MB / 1.229 GB, free: 13.75 MB / 0.9669 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt findStateOrder (simulation): time 8.371e-05/1.054, allocations: 11.94 kB / 1.229 GB, free: 13.74 MB / 0.9669 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt replaceEdgeChange (simulation): time 0.0004949/1.054, allocations: 151.9 kB / 1.229 GB, free: 13.59 MB / 0.9669 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt inlineArrayEqn (simulation): time 9.16e-05/1.055, allocations: 96 kB / 1.229 GB, free: 13.5 MB / 0.9669 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt removeEqualRHS (simulation): time 0.007866/1.062, allocations: 4.758 MB / 1.234 GB, free: 8.727 MB / 0.9669 GB Warning: The model contains alias variables with redundant start and/or conflicting nominal values. It is recommended to resolve the conflicts, because otherwise the system could be hard to solve. To print the conflicting alias sets and the chosen candidates please use -d=aliasConflicts. Notification: Performance of preOpt removeSimpleEquations (simulation): time 0.0558/1.118, allocations: 33.76 MB / 1.267 GB, free: 5.312 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt comSubExp (simulation): time 0.0123/1.131, allocations: 6.234 MB / 1.273 GB, free: 14.97 MB / 1.014 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt resolveLoops (simulation): time 0.00431/1.135, allocations: 2.552 MB / 1.276 GB, free: 12.42 MB / 1.014 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt evalFunc (simulation): time 0.02689/1.162, allocations: 13.23 MB / 1.288 GB, free: 14.65 MB / 1.029 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt encapsulateWhenConditions (simulation): time 0.003285/1.165, allocations: 2.137 MB / 1.291 GB, free: 12.49 MB / 1.029 GB Notification: Performance of pre-optimization done (n=224): time 5.36e-06/1.165, allocations: 0 / 1.291 GB, free: 12.49 MB / 1.029 GB Notification: Performance of matching and sorting (n=232): time 0.02765/1.193, allocations: 14.02 MB / 1.304 GB, free: 14.28 MB / 1.045 GB Notification: Performance of inlineWhenForInitialization (initialization): time 7.374e-05/1.193, allocations: 132.8 kB / 1.304 GB, free: 14.12 MB / 1.045 GB Notification: Performance of selectInitializationVariablesDAE (initialization): time 0.0195/1.213, allocations: 10.42 MB / 1.315 GB, free: 3.707 MB / 1.045 GB Notification: Performance of collectPreVariables (initialization): time 0.0009735/1.214, allocations: 113.7 kB / 1.315 GB, free: 3.59 MB / 1.045 GB Notification: Performance of collectInitialEqns (initialization): time 0.004273/1.218, allocations: 3.309 MB / 1.318 GB, free: 264 kB / 1.045 GB Notification: Performance of collectInitialBindings (initialization): time 0.001793/1.22, allocations: 0.8669 MB / 1.319 GB, free: 15.38 MB / 1.061 GB Notification: Performance of simplifyInitialFunctions (initialization): time 0.002718/1.222, allocations: 1.209 MB / 1.32 GB, free: 14.16 MB / 1.061 GB Notification: Performance of setup shared object (initialization): time 9.218e-05/1.222, allocations: 301.1 kB / 1.32 GB, free: 13.86 MB / 1.061 GB Notification: Performance of preBalanceInitialSystem (initialization): time 0.005394/1.228, allocations: 3.447 MB / 1.324 GB, free: 10.39 MB / 1.061 GB Notification: Performance of partitionIndependentBlocks (initialization): time 0.006813/1.235, allocations: 5.94 MB / 1.329 GB, free: 3.25 MB / 1.061 GB Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3])) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3])) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3])) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3])) Notification: Performance of analyzeInitialSystem (initialization): time 0.05948/1.294, allocations: 36.64 MB / 1.365 GB, free: 13.16 MB / 1.107 GB Notification: Performance of solveInitialSystemEqSystem (initialization): time 7.857e-05/1.294, allocations: 24 kB / 1.365 GB, free: 13.14 MB / 1.107 GB Notification: Performance of matching and sorting (n=659) (initialization): time 0.01886/1.313, allocations: 10.08 MB / 1.375 GB, free: 2.98 MB / 1.107 GB Notification: Performance of prepare postOptimizeDAE: time 0.0001401/1.313, allocations: 73.7 kB / 1.375 GB, free: 2.902 MB / 1.107 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyComplexFunction (initialization): time 0.0001477/1.314, allocations: 87.94 kB / 1.375 GB, free: 2.816 MB / 1.107 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt tearingSystem (initialization): time 0.001826/1.315, allocations: 0.7126 MB / 1.376 GB, free: 2.082 MB / 1.107 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt solveSimpleEquations (initialization): time 0.00584/1.321, allocations: 1.482 MB / 1.377 GB, free: 0.5977 MB / 1.107 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt calculateStrongComponentJacobians (initialization): time 0.01313/1.334, allocations: 14.51 MB / 1.391 GB, free: 1.102 MB / 1.123 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyAllExpressions (initialization): time 0.009838/1.344, allocations: 1.182 MB / 1.393 GB, free: 15.92 MB / 1.139 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt collapseArrayExpressions (initialization): time 0.001214/1.345, allocations: 280 kB / 1.393 GB, free: 15.64 MB / 1.139 GB Warning: The initial conditions are over specified. The following 8 initial equations are redundant, so they are removed from the initialization system: sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3]) sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3]) sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3]) sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]). Notification: Performance of preBalanceInitialSystem (initialization_lambda0): time 0.01182/1.357, allocations: 7.084 MB / 1.4 GB, free: 8.547 MB / 1.139 GB Notification: Performance of partitionIndependentBlocks (initialization_lambda0): time 0.007566/1.365, allocations: 5.928 MB / 1.406 GB, free: 1.414 MB / 1.139 GB Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3])) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3])) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3])) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3])) Notification: Performance of analyzeInitialSystem (initialization_lambda0): time 0.0635/1.428, allocations: 36.57 MB / 1.441 GB, free: 11.39 MB / 1.186 GB Notification: Performance of solveInitialSystemEqSystem (initialization_lambda0): time 8.634e-05/1.429, allocations: 27.98 kB / 1.441 GB, free: 11.36 MB / 1.186 GB Notification: Performance of matching and sorting (n=659) (initialization_lambda0): time 0.01958/1.448, allocations: 10.07 MB / 1.451 GB, free: 1.203 MB / 1.186 GB Notification: Performance of prepare postOptimizeDAE: time 9.587e-05/1.448, allocations: 65.7 kB / 1.451 GB, free: 1.133 MB / 1.186 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyComplexFunction (initialization): time 0.0001561/1.448, allocations: 87.98 kB / 1.451 GB, free: 1.047 MB / 1.186 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt tearingSystem (initialization): time 0.00168/1.45, allocations: 0.7171 MB / 1.452 GB, free: 316 kB / 1.186 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt solveSimpleEquations (initialization): time 0.00539/1.456, allocations: 1.482 MB / 1.453 GB, free: 14.82 MB / 1.201 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt calculateStrongComponentJacobians (initialization): time 0.01384/1.469, allocations: 14.51 MB / 1.468 GB, free: 15.33 MB / 1.217 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyAllExpressions (initialization): time 0.01131/1.481, allocations: 1.178 MB / 1.469 GB, free: 14.15 MB / 1.217 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt collapseArrayExpressions (initialization): time 0.001596/1.482, allocations: 280 kB / 1.469 GB, free: 13.88 MB / 1.217 GB Warning: The initial conditions are over specified. The following 8 initial equations are redundant, so they are removed from the initialization_lambda0 system: sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3]) sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3]) sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3]) sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]). Notification: Model statistics after passing the back-end for initialization: * Number of independent subsystems: 384 * Number of states: 0 () * Number of discrete variables: 5 ($PRE.pulse.count,$PRE.pulse.T_start,pulse.count,pulse.T_start,$whenCondition1) * Number of discrete states: 0 () * Number of clocked states: 0 () * Top-level inputs: 0 Notification: Strong component statistics for initialization (635): * Single equations (assignments): 627 * Array equations: 0 * Algorithm blocks: 1 * Record equations: 0 * When equations: 0 * If-equations: 0 * Equation systems (not torn): 0 * Torn equation systems: 7 * Mixed (continuous/discrete) equation systems: 0 Notification: Torn system details for strict tearing set: * Linear torn systems (#iteration vars, #inner vars, density): 7 systems {(1,9,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,9,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%)} * Non-linear torn systems (#iteration vars, #inner vars): 0 systems Notification: Performance of prepare postOptimizeDAE: time 0.002744/1.485, allocations: 0.7575 MB / 1.47 GB, free: 13.11 MB / 1.217 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt lateInlineFunction (simulation): time 0.003027/1.488, allocations: 0.6633 MB / 1.47 GB, free: 12.44 MB / 1.217 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt wrapFunctionCalls (simulation): time 0.01067/1.499, allocations: 5.154 MB / 1.475 GB, free: 7.25 MB / 1.217 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifysemiLinear (simulation): time 0.006126/1.505, allocations: 3.962 MB / 1.479 GB, free: 3.25 MB / 1.217 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyComplexFunction (simulation): time 1.121e-05/1.505, allocations: 0 / 1.479 GB, free: 3.25 MB / 1.217 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt removeConstants (simulation): time 0.00626/1.511, allocations: 1.66 MB / 1.481 GB, free: 1.562 MB / 1.217 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyTimeIndepFuncCalls (simulation): time 0.002745/1.514, allocations: 119.9 kB / 1.481 GB, free: 1.445 MB / 1.217 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyAllExpressions (simulation): time 0.006265/1.52, allocations: 0.6316 MB / 1.482 GB, free: 0.8125 MB / 1.217 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt findZeroCrossings (simulation): time 0.0005877/1.521, allocations: 165.7 kB / 1.482 GB, free: 0.6523 MB / 1.217 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt createDAEmodeBDAE (simulation): time 0.01298/1.534, allocations: 6.313 MB / 1.488 GB, free: 10.3 MB / 1.232 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt symbolicJacobianDAE (simulation): time 0.01267/1.547, allocations: 7.763 MB / 1.496 GB, free: 2.5 MB / 1.232 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt setEvaluationStage (simulation): time 0.003214/1.55, allocations: 2.287 MB / 1.498 GB, free: 216 kB / 1.232 GB Notification: Performance of sorting global known variables: time 0.01874/1.569, allocations: 7.339 MB / 1.505 GB, free: 8.879 MB / 1.248 GB Notification: Performance of Backend: time 1.332e-06/1.569, allocations: 0 / 1.505 GB, free: 8.879 MB / 1.248 GB Notification: Performance of simCode: created initialization part: time 0.02905/1.598, allocations: 12.45 MB / 1.517 GB, free: 12.26 MB / 1.264 GB Notification: Performance of SimCode: time 0.04579/1.644, allocations: 20.47 MB / 1.537 GB, free: 7.777 MB / 1.279 GB Notification: Performance of Templates: time 0.7958/2.439, allocations: 166.4 MB / 1.7 GB, free: 355.9 MB / 1.311 GB make -j1 -f Buildings_9_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference.makefile (rm -f Buildings_9_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference.pipe ; mkfifo Buildings_9_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference.pipe ; head -c 1048576 < Buildings_9_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference.pipe >> ../files/Buildings_9_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference.sim & ./Buildings_9_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference -abortSlowSimulation -alarm=480 -emit_protected -lv LOG_STATS > Buildings_9_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference.pipe 2>&1) diffSimulationResults("Buildings_9_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference_res.mat","/mnt/ReferenceFiles/Buildings/csv/maint_9.1.x/Buildings_Fluid_HeatExchangers_RadiantSlabs_Examples_StepResponseFiniteDifference.csv","/var/lib/jenkins1/ws/OpenModelicaLibraryTestingWork/OpenModelicaLibraryTesting/files/Buildings_9_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference.diff",relTol=0.003,relTolDiffMinMax=0.003,rangeDelta=0.001) Reference file matches