Running: ./testmodel.py --libraries=/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries --ompython_omhome=/usr Buildings_latest_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.conf.json
loadFile("/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/ModelicaServices 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo", uses=false)
loadFile("/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Complex 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo", uses=false)
loadFile("/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Modelica 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo", uses=false)
loadFile("/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Buildings 11.0.1-master/package.mo", uses=false)
Using package Buildings with version 11.0.1 (/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Buildings 11.0.1-master/package.mo)
Using package Modelica with version 4.0.0 (/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Modelica 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo)
Using package Complex with version 4.0.0 (/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Complex 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo)
Using package ModelicaServices with version 4.0.0 (/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/ModelicaServices 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo)
Running command: translateModel(Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU,tolerance=1e-06,outputFormat="mat",numberOfIntervals=5000,variableFilter="time|sla.sta_b.T|sla.surf_a.T|sla.surf_b.T|sla.surf_a.Q_flow|sla.surf_b.Q_flow",fileNamePrefix="Buildings_latest_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU")
translateModel(Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU,tolerance=1e-06,outputFormat="mat",numberOfIntervals=5000,variableFilter="time|sla.sta_b.T|sla.surf_a.T|sla.surf_b.T|sla.surf_a.Q_flow|sla.surf_b.Q_flow",fileNamePrefix="Buildings_latest_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU")
Notification: Performance of loadFile(/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/ModelicaServices 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo): time 0.00473/0.00473, allocations: 101.2 kB / 15.73 MB, free: 6.047 MB / 14.72 MB
Notification: Performance of loadFile(/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Complex 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo): time 0.001136/0.001136, allocations: 198.3 kB / 16.67 MB, free: 5.977 MB / 14.72 MB
Notification: Performance of loadFile(/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Modelica 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo): time 1.335/1.335, allocations: 222.9 MB / 240.4 MB, free: 4.34 MB / 190.1 MB
Notification: Performance of loadFile(/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Buildings 11.0.1-master/package.mo): time 2.666/2.666, allocations: 461.9 MB / 0.7348 GB, free: 14.63 MB / 0.5919 GB
Notification: Performance of FrontEnd - loaded program: time 0.001284/0.001284, allocations: 67.89 kB / 1.054 GB, free: 7.137 MB / 0.8106 GB
Notification: Performance of FrontEnd - Absyn->SCode: time 0.3218/0.3231, allocations: 157.4 MB / 1.208 GB, free: 9.633 MB / 0.9669 GB
Notification: Performance of NFInst.instantiate(Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU): time 0.03265/0.3558, allocations: 31.77 MB / 1.239 GB, free: 9.75 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of NFInst.instExpressions: time 0.6288/0.9847, allocations: 12.28 MB / 1.251 GB, free: 3.844 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of NFInst.updateImplicitVariability: time 0.003215/0.9879, allocations: 62.72 kB / 1.251 GB, free: 3.844 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of NFTyping.typeComponents: time 0.003906/0.9919, allocations: 1.107 MB / 1.252 GB, free: 3.84 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of NFTyping.typeBindings: time 0.006726/0.9986, allocations: 2.076 MB / 1.254 GB, free: 3.824 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of NFTyping.typeClassSections: time 0.006533/1.005, allocations: 1.867 MB / 1.256 GB, free: 3.77 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of NFFlatten.flatten: time 0.0264/1.032, allocations: 19.54 MB / 1.275 GB, free: 2.207 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of NFFlatten.resolveConnections: time 0.01288/1.045, allocations: 7.201 MB / 1.282 GB, free: 1.277 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of NFEvalConstants.evaluate: time 0.01554/1.06, allocations: 6.547 MB / 1.288 GB, free: 0 / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of NFSimplifyModel.simplify: time 0.01456/1.075, allocations: 5.352 MB / 1.293 GB, free: 14 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of NFPackage.collectConstants: time 0.004456/1.079, allocations: 0.7533 MB / 1.294 GB, free: 14 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of NFFlatten.collectFunctions: time 0.01212/1.091, allocations: 3.21 MB / 1.297 GB, free: 13.33 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of NFScalarize.scalarize: time 0.007045/1.098, allocations: 3.005 MB / 1.3 GB, free: 12.03 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of NFVerifyModel.verify: time 0.01458/1.113, allocations: 4.75 MB / 1.305 GB, free: 9.102 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of NFConvertDAE.convert: time 0.02839/1.141, allocations: 15.43 MB / 1.32 GB, free: 1.902 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of FrontEnd - DAE generated: time 9.648e-06/1.142, allocations: 0 / 1.32 GB, free: 1.902 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of FrontEnd: time 1.894e-06/1.142, allocations: 3.938 kB / 1.32 GB, free: 1.898 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of Transformations before backend: time 0.0005047/1.142, allocations: 0 / 1.32 GB, free: 1.898 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Model statistics after passing the front-end and creating the data structures used by the back-end:
 * Number of equations: 866
 * Number of variables: 866
Notification: Performance of Generate backend data structure: time 0.04156/1.184, allocations: 11.5 MB / 1.331 GB, free: 10.81 MB / 1.029 GB
Notification: Performance of prepare preOptimizeDAE: time 4.458e-05/1.184, allocations: 11.41 kB / 1.331 GB, free: 10.81 MB / 1.029 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt normalInlineFunction (simulation): time 0.00541/1.189, allocations: 0.8762 MB / 1.332 GB, free: 10.36 MB / 1.029 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt evaluateParameters (simulation): time 0.02412/1.213, allocations: 9.617 MB / 1.341 GB, free: 4.699 MB / 1.029 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt simplifyIfEquations (simulation): time 0.000372/1.214, allocations: 338.7 kB / 1.342 GB, free: 4.504 MB / 1.029 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt expandDerOperator (simulation): time 0.002325/1.216, allocations: 483.6 kB / 1.342 GB, free: 4.035 MB / 1.029 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt clockPartitioning (simulation): time 0.01502/1.231, allocations: 5.958 MB / 1.348 GB, free: 13.84 MB / 1.045 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt findStateOrder (simulation): time 0.0001549/1.231, allocations: 11.88 kB / 1.348 GB, free: 13.82 MB / 1.045 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt replaceEdgeChange (simulation): time 0.00133/1.233, allocations: 148 kB / 1.348 GB, free: 13.68 MB / 1.045 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt inlineArrayEqn (simulation): time 0.0001191/1.233, allocations: 103.5 kB / 1.348 GB, free: 13.58 MB / 1.045 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt removeEqualRHS (simulation): time 0.009887/1.243, allocations: 4.762 MB / 1.353 GB, free: 8.809 MB / 1.045 GB
Warning: The model contains alias variables with redundant start and/or conflicting nominal values. It is recommended to resolve the conflicts, because otherwise the system could be hard to solve. To print the conflicting alias sets and the chosen candidates please use -d=aliasConflicts.
Notification: Performance of preOpt removeSimpleEquations (simulation): time 0.06597/1.309, allocations: 33.75 MB / 1.386 GB, free: 5.555 MB / 1.076 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt comSubExp (simulation): time 0.01304/1.322, allocations: 6.234 MB / 1.392 GB, free: 15.28 MB / 1.092 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt resolveLoops (simulation): time 0.004572/1.326, allocations: 2.561 MB / 1.395 GB, free: 12.72 MB / 1.092 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt evalFunc (simulation): time 0.03192/1.358, allocations: 13.23 MB / 1.407 GB, free: 15 MB / 1.107 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt encapsulateWhenConditions (simulation): time 0.00397/1.362, allocations: 2.137 MB / 1.41 GB, free: 12.85 MB / 1.107 GB
Notification: Performance of pre-optimization done (n=224): time 4.629e-06/1.362, allocations: 0 / 1.41 GB, free: 12.85 MB / 1.107 GB
Notification: Performance of matching and sorting (n=232): time 0.033/1.395, allocations: 14.02 MB / 1.423 GB, free: 14.64 MB / 1.123 GB
Notification: Performance of inlineWhenForInitialization (initialization): time 9.325e-05/1.395, allocations: 132.8 kB / 1.423 GB, free: 14.49 MB / 1.123 GB
Notification: Performance of selectInitializationVariablesDAE (initialization): time 0.02227/1.418, allocations: 10.42 MB / 1.434 GB, free: 4.07 MB / 1.123 GB
Notification: Performance of collectPreVariables (initialization): time 0.001103/1.419, allocations: 117.7 kB / 1.434 GB, free: 3.949 MB / 1.123 GB
Notification: Performance of collectInitialEqns (initialization): time 0.004957/1.424, allocations: 3.301 MB / 1.437 GB, free: 0.6562 MB / 1.123 GB
Notification: Performance of collectInitialBindings (initialization): time 0.002131/1.426, allocations: 0.8739 MB / 1.438 GB, free: 15.79 MB / 1.139 GB
Notification: Performance of simplifyInitialFunctions (initialization): time 0.004201/1.43, allocations: 1.209 MB / 1.439 GB, free: 14.57 MB / 1.139 GB
Notification: Performance of setup shared object (initialization): time 0.0001304/1.43, allocations: 305.1 kB / 1.439 GB, free: 14.27 MB / 1.139 GB
Notification: Performance of preBalanceInitialSystem (initialization): time 0.005362/1.436, allocations: 3.447 MB / 1.443 GB, free: 10.8 MB / 1.139 GB
Notification: Performance of partitionIndependentBlocks (initialization): time 0.007096/1.443, allocations: 5.933 MB / 1.448 GB, free: 3.672 MB / 1.139 GB
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3]))
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3]))
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3]))
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]))
Notification: Performance of analyzeInitialSystem (initialization): time 0.0616/1.504, allocations: 36.65 MB / 1.484 GB, free: 13.6 MB / 1.186 GB
Notification: Performance of solveInitialSystemEqSystem (initialization): time 5.748e-05/1.505, allocations: 24 kB / 1.484 GB, free: 13.57 MB / 1.186 GB
Notification: Performance of matching and sorting (n=659) (initialization): time 0.02212/1.527, allocations: 10.07 MB / 1.494 GB, free: 3.418 MB / 1.186 GB
Notification: Performance of prepare postOptimizeDAE: time 0.0001297/1.527, allocations: 69.7 kB / 1.494 GB, free: 3.344 MB / 1.186 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyComplexFunction (initialization): time 0.0001561/1.527, allocations: 84.09 kB / 1.494 GB, free: 3.262 MB / 1.186 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt tearingSystem (initialization): time 0.001891/1.529, allocations: 0.714 MB / 1.495 GB, free: 2.527 MB / 1.186 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt solveSimpleEquations (initialization): time 0.005813/1.535, allocations: 1.482 MB / 1.496 GB, free: 1.043 MB / 1.186 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt calculateStrongComponentJacobians (initialization): time 0.0128/1.548, allocations: 14.53 MB / 1.51 GB, free: 1.562 MB / 1.201 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyAllExpressions (initialization): time 0.01065/1.558, allocations: 1.182 MB / 1.512 GB, free: 388 kB / 1.201 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt collapseArrayExpressions (initialization): time 0.001366/1.56, allocations: 276 kB / 1.512 GB, free: 112 kB / 1.201 GB
Warning: The initial conditions are over specified. The following 8 initial equations are redundant, so they are removed from the initialization system:
         sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start
         sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start
         sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start
         sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start
         sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3])
         sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3])
         sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3])
         sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]).
Notification: Performance of preBalanceInitialSystem (initialization_lambda0): time 0.01537/1.575, allocations: 7.089 MB / 1.519 GB, free: 9.008 MB / 1.217 GB
Notification: Performance of partitionIndependentBlocks (initialization_lambda0): time 0.009039/1.584, allocations: 5.932 MB / 1.525 GB, free: 1.871 MB / 1.217 GB
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3]))
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3]))
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3]))
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]))
Notification: Performance of analyzeInitialSystem (initialization_lambda0): time 0.06797/1.652, allocations: 36.57 MB / 1.56 GB, free: 11.86 MB / 1.264 GB
Notification: Performance of solveInitialSystemEqSystem (initialization_lambda0): time 7.522e-05/1.652, allocations: 24 kB / 1.56 GB, free: 11.83 MB / 1.264 GB
Notification: Performance of matching and sorting (n=659) (initialization_lambda0): time 0.0236/1.676, allocations: 10.07 MB / 1.57 GB, free: 1.676 MB / 1.264 GB
Notification: Performance of prepare postOptimizeDAE: time 0.0001293/1.676, allocations: 69.64 kB / 1.57 GB, free: 1.602 MB / 1.264 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyComplexFunction (initialization): time 0.0001402/1.676, allocations: 84 kB / 1.57 GB, free: 1.52 MB / 1.264 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt tearingSystem (initialization): time 0.001876/1.678, allocations: 0.7199 MB / 1.571 GB, free: 0.7812 MB / 1.264 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt solveSimpleEquations (initialization): time 0.006369/1.684, allocations: 1.47 MB / 1.572 GB, free: 15.31 MB / 1.279 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt calculateStrongComponentJacobians (initialization): time 0.01382/1.698, allocations: 14.51 MB / 1.587 GB, free: 15.83 MB / 1.295 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyAllExpressions (initialization): time 0.0109/1.709, allocations: 1.178 MB / 1.588 GB, free: 14.65 MB / 1.295 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt collapseArrayExpressions (initialization): time 0.001459/1.711, allocations: 284 kB / 1.588 GB, free: 14.38 MB / 1.295 GB
Warning: The initial conditions are over specified. The following 8 initial equations are redundant, so they are removed from the initialization_lambda0 system:
         sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start
         sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start
         sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start
         sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start
         sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3])
         sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3])
         sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3])
         sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]).
Notification: Model statistics after passing the back-end for initialization:
 * Number of independent subsystems: 384
 * Number of states: 0 ()
 * Number of discrete variables: 5 ($PRE.pulse.count,$PRE.pulse.T_start,pulse.count,pulse.T_start,$whenCondition1)
 * Number of discrete states: 0 ()
 * Number of clocked states: 0 ()
 * Top-level inputs: 0
Notification: Strong component statistics for initialization (635):
 * Single equations (assignments): 627
 * Array equations: 0
 * Algorithm blocks: 1
 * Record equations: 0
 * When equations: 0
 * If-equations: 0
 * Equation systems (not torn): 0
 * Torn equation systems: 7
 * Mixed (continuous/discrete) equation systems: 0
Notification: Torn system details for strict tearing set:
 * Linear torn systems (#iteration vars, #inner vars, density): 7 systems
   {(1,9,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,9,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%)}
 * Non-linear torn systems (#iteration vars, #inner vars): 0 systems
Notification: Performance of prepare postOptimizeDAE: time 0.002955/1.714, allocations: 0.7584 MB / 1.589 GB, free: 13.61 MB / 1.295 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt lateInlineFunction (simulation): time 0.003726/1.717, allocations: 0.6672 MB / 1.589 GB, free: 12.94 MB / 1.295 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt wrapFunctionCalls (simulation): time 0.01108/1.729, allocations: 5.146 MB / 1.594 GB, free: 7.754 MB / 1.295 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt inlineArrayEqn (simulation): time 2.546e-05/1.729, allocations: 27.94 kB / 1.595 GB, free: 7.727 MB / 1.295 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt constantLinearSystem (simulation): time 1.161e-05/1.729, allocations: 4 kB / 1.595 GB, free: 7.723 MB / 1.295 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifysemiLinear (simulation): time 0.005989/1.735, allocations: 3.966 MB / 1.598 GB, free: 3.723 MB / 1.295 GB
Warning: The model contains alias variables with redundant start and/or conflicting nominal values. It is recommended to resolve the conflicts, because otherwise the system could be hard to solve. To print the conflicting alias sets and the chosen candidates please use -d=aliasConflicts.
Notification: Performance of postOpt removeSimpleEquations (simulation): time 0.02936/1.764, allocations: 13.42 MB / 1.611 GB, free: 6.133 MB / 1.311 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyComplexFunction (simulation): time 1.267e-05/1.764, allocations: 4 kB / 1.611 GB, free: 6.129 MB / 1.311 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt solveSimpleEquations (simulation): time 0.002708/1.767, allocations: 0.601 MB / 1.612 GB, free: 5.527 MB / 1.311 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt tearingSystem (simulation): time 0.001472/1.768, allocations: 0.5794 MB / 1.613 GB, free: 4.926 MB / 1.311 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt inputDerivativesUsed (simulation): time 0.0003675/1.769, allocations: 135.9 kB / 1.613 GB, free: 4.793 MB / 1.311 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt calculateStrongComponentJacobians (simulation): time 0.01142/1.78, allocations: 14.39 MB / 1.627 GB, free: 5.43 MB / 1.326 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt calculateStateSetsJacobians (simulation): time 4.418e-06/1.78, allocations: 4 kB / 1.627 GB, free: 5.426 MB / 1.326 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt symbolicJacobian (simulation): time 0.0119/1.792, allocations: 7.12 MB / 1.634 GB, free: 14.22 MB / 1.342 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt removeConstants (simulation): time 0.006464/1.798, allocations: 1.66 MB / 1.635 GB, free: 12.53 MB / 1.342 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyTimeIndepFuncCalls (simulation): time 0.002526/1.801, allocations: 123.9 kB / 1.636 GB, free: 12.41 MB / 1.342 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyAllExpressions (simulation): time 0.005891/1.807, allocations: 0.6122 MB / 1.636 GB, free: 11.8 MB / 1.342 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt findZeroCrossings (simulation): time 0.0005593/1.808, allocations: 165.7 kB / 1.636 GB, free: 11.64 MB / 1.342 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt collapseArrayExpressions (simulation): time 0.0002578/1.808, allocations: 87.95 kB / 1.636 GB, free: 11.55 MB / 1.342 GB
Notification: Performance of sorting global known variables: time 0.0144/1.822, allocations: 7.335 MB / 1.644 GB, free: 4.227 MB / 1.342 GB
Notification: Performance of sort global known variables: time 4.6e-07/1.822, allocations: 4 kB / 1.644 GB, free: 4.223 MB / 1.342 GB
Notification: Performance of remove unused functions: time 0.01864/1.841, allocations: 3.961 MB / 1.647 GB, free: 268 kB / 1.342 GB
Notification: Model statistics after passing the back-end for simulation:
 * Number of independent subsystems: 12
 * Number of states: 43 (sla.vol[1].dynBal.U,sla.vol[2].dynBal.U,sla.vol[3].dynBal.U,sla.vol[4].dynBal.U,sla.vol[5].dynBal.U,sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_b[1].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[2].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[3].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[4].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[5].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T[3],TOut.T)
 * Number of discrete variables: 3 ($whenCondition1,pulse.T_start,pulse.count)
 * Number of discrete states: 1 (pulse.count)
 * Number of clocked states: 0 ()
 * Top-level inputs: 0
Notification: Strong component statistics for simulation (210):
 * Single equations (assignments): 199
 * Array equations: 0
 * Algorithm blocks: 0
 * Record equations: 2
 * When equations: 2
 * If-equations: 0
 * Equation systems (not torn): 0
 * Torn equation systems: 7
 * Mixed (continuous/discrete) equation systems: 0
Notification: Torn system details for strict tearing set:
 * Linear torn systems (#iteration vars, #inner vars, density): 7 systems
   {(1,9,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,9,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%)}
 * Non-linear torn systems (#iteration vars, #inner vars): 0 systems
Notification: Performance of Backend phase and start with SimCode phase: time 0.002392/1.843, allocations: 0.5932 MB / 1.648 GB, free: 15.7 MB / 1.357 GB
Notification: Performance of simCode: created initialization part: time 0.02258/1.866, allocations: 13.44 MB / 1.661 GB, free: 2.086 MB / 1.357 GB
Notification: Performance of simCode: created event and clocks part: time 1.209e-05/1.866, allocations: 4 kB / 1.661 GB, free: 2.082 MB / 1.357 GB
Notification: Performance of simCode: created simulation system equations: time 0.004897/1.871, allocations: 3.044 MB / 1.664 GB, free: 14.95 MB / 1.373 GB
Notification: Performance of simCode: created of all other equations (e.g. parameter, nominal, assert, etc): time 0.01611/1.887, allocations: 2.926 MB / 1.667 GB, free: 12.06 MB / 1.373 GB
Notification: Performance of simCode: created linear, non-linear and system jacobian parts: time 0.03245/1.919, allocations: 18.77 MB / 1.685 GB, free: 9.258 MB / 1.389 GB
Notification: Performance of simCode: some other stuff during SimCode phase: time 0.007426/1.927, allocations: 5.369 MB / 1.691 GB, free: 3.848 MB / 1.389 GB
Notification: Performance of simCode: alias equations: time 0.01484/1.942, allocations: 6.43 MB / 1.697 GB, free: 13.43 MB / 1.404 GB
Notification: Performance of simCode: all other stuff during SimCode phase: time 0.002553/1.944, allocations: 423.3 kB / 1.697 GB, free: 13.02 MB / 1.404 GB
Notification: Performance of SimCode: time 9.52e-07/1.944, allocations: 0 / 1.697 GB, free: 13.02 MB / 1.404 GB
Notification: Performance of Templates: time 0.8549/2.799, allocations: 139.3 MB / 1.833 GB, free: 0.499 GB / 1.514 GB
make -j1 -f Buildings_latest_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.makefile
(rm -f Buildings_latest_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.pipe ; mkfifo Buildings_latest_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.pipe ; head -c 1048576 < Buildings_latest_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.pipe >> ../files/Buildings_latest_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.sim & ./Buildings_latest_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU  -abortSlowSimulation -alarm=480  -emit_protected -lv LOG_STATS > Buildings_latest_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.pipe 2>&1)
diffSimulationResults("Buildings_latest_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU_res.mat","/mnt/ReferenceFiles/Buildings/csv/master/Buildings_Fluid_HeatExchangers_RadiantSlabs_Examples_StepResponseEpsilonNTU.csv","/var/lib/jenkins/ws/OpenModelicaLibraryTestingWork/OpenModelicaLibraryTesting/files/Buildings_latest_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.diff",relTol=0.003,relTolDiffMinMax=0.003,rangeDelta=0.001)
Reference file matches