Running: ./testmodel.py --libraries=/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries --ompython_omhome=/usr Buildings_9_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference.conf.json loadFile("/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/ModelicaServices 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo", uses=false) loadFile("/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Complex 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo", uses=false) loadFile("/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Modelica 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo", uses=false) loadFile("/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Buildings 9.1.3-maint.9.1.x/package.mo", uses=false) Using package Buildings with version 9.1.3 (/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Buildings 9.1.3-maint.9.1.x/package.mo) Using package Modelica with version 4.0.0 (/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Modelica 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo) Using package Complex with version 4.0.0 (/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Complex 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo) Using package ModelicaServices with version 4.0.0 (/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/ModelicaServices 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo) Running command: translateModel(Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference,tolerance=1e-06,outputFormat="mat",numberOfIntervals=5000,variableFilter="time|sla.sta_b.T|sla.surf_a.T|sla.surf_b.T|sla.surf_a.Q_flow|sla.surf_b.Q_flow",fileNamePrefix="Buildings_9_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference") translateModel(Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference,tolerance=1e-06,outputFormat="mat",numberOfIntervals=5000,variableFilter="time|sla.sta_b.T|sla.surf_a.T|sla.surf_b.T|sla.surf_a.Q_flow|sla.surf_b.Q_flow",fileNamePrefix="Buildings_9_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference") Notification: Performance of loadFile(/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/ModelicaServices 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo): time 0.007199/0.007199, allocations: 98.19 kB / 15.73 MB, free: 5.605 MB / 14.72 MB Notification: Performance of loadFile(/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Complex 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo): time 0.001488/0.001488, allocations: 199.4 kB / 16.67 MB, free: 5.531 MB / 14.72 MB Notification: Performance of loadFile(/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Modelica 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo): time 1.356/1.356, allocations: 222.9 MB / 240.4 MB, free: 15.11 MB / 206.1 MB Notification: Performance of loadFile(/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Buildings 9.1.3-maint.9.1.x/package.mo): time 2.208/2.208, allocations: 390.2 MB / 0.6648 GB, free: 0.6289 MB / 0.5294 GB Notification: Performance of FrontEnd - loaded program: time 0.001227/0.001227, allocations: 59.91 kB / 0.9509 GB, free: 7.637 MB / 0.7325 GB Notification: Performance of FrontEnd - Absyn->SCode: time 0.8877/0.8889, allocations: 140.4 MB / 1.088 GB, free: 5.535 MB / 0.8575 GB Notification: Performance of NFInst.instantiate(Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference): time 0.0377/0.9266, allocations: 31.77 MB / 1.119 GB, free: 14.8 MB / 0.8887 GB Notification: Performance of NFInst.instExpressions: time 0.02079/0.9475, allocations: 12.28 MB / 1.131 GB, free: 6.105 MB / 0.8887 GB Notification: Performance of NFInst.updateImplicitVariability: time 0.003267/0.9508, allocations: 63.66 kB / 1.131 GB, free: 6.082 MB / 0.8887 GB Notification: Performance of NFTyping.typeComponents: time 0.003726/0.9545, allocations: 1.124 MB / 1.132 GB, free: 5.48 MB / 0.8887 GB Notification: Performance of NFTyping.typeBindings: time 0.007399/0.962, allocations: 2.148 MB / 1.134 GB, free: 4.23 MB / 0.8887 GB Notification: Performance of NFTyping.typeClassSections: time 0.006348/0.9683, allocations: 1.871 MB / 1.136 GB, free: 3.301 MB / 0.8887 GB Notification: Performance of NFFlatten.flatten: time 0.02432/0.9927, allocations: 19.58 MB / 1.155 GB, free: 11.1 MB / 0.9044 GB Notification: Performance of NFFlatten.resolveConnections: time 0.01139/1.004, allocations: 7.199 MB / 1.162 GB, free: 7.793 MB / 0.9044 GB Notification: Performance of NFEvalConstants.evaluate: time 0.01453/1.019, allocations: 6.53 MB / 1.169 GB, free: 4.48 MB / 0.9044 GB Notification: Performance of NFSimplifyModel.simplify: time 0.01125/1.03, allocations: 5.352 MB / 1.174 GB, free: 1.262 MB / 0.9044 GB Notification: Performance of NFPackage.collectConstants: time 0.002899/1.033, allocations: 0.7495 MB / 1.175 GB, free: 1.262 MB / 0.9044 GB Notification: Performance of NFFlatten.collectFunctions: time 0.00973/1.043, allocations: 3.224 MB / 1.178 GB, free: 15.79 MB / 0.92 GB Notification: Performance of NFScalarize.scalarize: time 0.005237/1.048, allocations: 2.996 MB / 1.181 GB, free: 13.74 MB / 0.92 GB Notification: Performance of NFVerifyModel.verify: time 0.01268/1.061, allocations: 4.75 MB / 1.185 GB, free: 10.4 MB / 0.92 GB Notification: Performance of NFConvertDAE.convert: time 0.02519/1.086, allocations: 15.48 MB / 1.2 GB, free: 10.88 MB / 0.9356 GB Notification: Performance of FrontEnd - DAE generated: time 6.832e-06/1.086, allocations: 3.938 kB / 1.2 GB, free: 10.87 MB / 0.9356 GB Notification: Performance of FrontEnd: time 1.523e-06/1.086, allocations: 4 kB / 1.2 GB, free: 10.87 MB / 0.9356 GB Notification: Performance of Transformations before backend: time 0.0004992/1.086, allocations: 4 kB / 1.2 GB, free: 10.86 MB / 0.9356 GB Notification: Model statistics after passing the front-end and creating the data structures used by the back-end: * Number of equations: 866 * Number of variables: 866 Notification: Performance of Generate backend data structure: time 0.03467/1.121, allocations: 11.75 MB / 1.212 GB, free: 14.99 MB / 0.9512 GB Notification: Performance of prepare preOptimizeDAE: time 4.609e-05/1.121, allocations: 8.031 kB / 1.212 GB, free: 14.98 MB / 0.9512 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt normalInlineFunction (simulation): time 0.004433/1.126, allocations: 0.924 MB / 1.213 GB, free: 14.05 MB / 0.9512 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt evaluateParameters (simulation): time 0.02457/1.15, allocations: 9.677 MB / 1.222 GB, free: 4.312 MB / 0.9512 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt simplifyIfEquations (simulation): time 0.0004434/1.151, allocations: 330.8 kB / 1.223 GB, free: 3.988 MB / 0.9512 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt expandDerOperator (simulation): time 0.002566/1.153, allocations: 483.9 kB / 1.223 GB, free: 3.516 MB / 0.9512 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt clockPartitioning (simulation): time 0.0158/1.169, allocations: 5.96 MB / 1.229 GB, free: 13.32 MB / 0.9669 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt findStateOrder (simulation): time 0.0001432/1.169, allocations: 11.94 kB / 1.229 GB, free: 13.31 MB / 0.9669 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt replaceEdgeChange (simulation): time 0.00102/1.17, allocations: 147.9 kB / 1.229 GB, free: 13.16 MB / 0.9669 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt inlineArrayEqn (simulation): time 0.0001324/1.17, allocations: 99.92 kB / 1.229 GB, free: 13.07 MB / 0.9669 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt removeEqualRHS (simulation): time 0.00942/1.18, allocations: 4.758 MB / 1.234 GB, free: 8.297 MB / 0.9669 GB Warning: The model contains alias variables with redundant start and/or conflicting nominal values. It is recommended to resolve the conflicts, because otherwise the system could be hard to solve. To print the conflicting alias sets and the chosen candidates please use -d=aliasConflicts. Notification: Performance of preOpt removeSimpleEquations (simulation): time 0.06351/1.243, allocations: 33.81 MB / 1.267 GB, free: 4.844 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt comSubExp (simulation): time 0.01397/1.257, allocations: 6.247 MB / 1.273 GB, free: 14.49 MB / 1.014 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt resolveLoops (simulation): time 0.00456/1.262, allocations: 2.544 MB / 1.275 GB, free: 11.94 MB / 1.014 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt evalFunc (simulation): time 0.02852/1.291, allocations: 13.25 MB / 1.288 GB, free: 14.15 MB / 1.029 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt encapsulateWhenConditions (simulation): time 0.003771/1.294, allocations: 2.137 MB / 1.29 GB, free: 11.99 MB / 1.029 GB Notification: Performance of pre-optimization done (n=224): time 6.232e-06/1.294, allocations: 7.938 kB / 1.29 GB, free: 11.98 MB / 1.029 GB Notification: Performance of matching and sorting (n=232): time 0.03433/1.329, allocations: 14.28 MB / 1.304 GB, free: 13.54 MB / 1.045 GB Notification: Performance of inlineWhenForInitialization (initialization): time 0.000133/1.329, allocations: 124.8 kB / 1.304 GB, free: 13.39 MB / 1.045 GB Notification: Performance of selectInitializationVariablesDAE (initialization): time 0.02424/1.353, allocations: 10.43 MB / 1.315 GB, free: 2.969 MB / 1.045 GB Notification: Performance of collectPreVariables (initialization): time 0.001103/1.354, allocations: 121.7 kB / 1.315 GB, free: 2.844 MB / 1.045 GB Notification: Performance of collectInitialEqns (initialization): time 0.005572/1.36, allocations: 3.337 MB / 1.318 GB, free: 15.48 MB / 1.061 GB Notification: Performance of collectInitialBindings (initialization): time 0.002295/1.362, allocations: 0.9182 MB / 1.319 GB, free: 14.56 MB / 1.061 GB Notification: Performance of simplifyInitialFunctions (initialization): time 0.004211/1.366, allocations: 1.214 MB / 1.32 GB, free: 13.34 MB / 1.061 GB Notification: Performance of setup shared object (initialization): time 0.0001028/1.367, allocations: 301.1 kB / 1.32 GB, free: 13.04 MB / 1.061 GB Notification: Performance of preBalanceInitialSystem (initialization): time 0.005871/1.372, allocations: 3.447 MB / 1.324 GB, free: 9.574 MB / 1.061 GB Notification: Performance of partitionIndependentBlocks (initialization): time 0.007376/1.38, allocations: 5.939 MB / 1.33 GB, free: 2.434 MB / 1.061 GB Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3])) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3])) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3])) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3])) Notification: Performance of analyzeInitialSystem (initialization): time 0.06173/1.442, allocations: 36.63 MB / 1.365 GB, free: 12.36 MB / 1.107 GB Notification: Performance of solveInitialSystemEqSystem (initialization): time 7.417e-05/1.442, allocations: 24 kB / 1.365 GB, free: 12.33 MB / 1.107 GB Notification: Performance of matching and sorting (n=659) (initialization): time 0.01983/1.462, allocations: 10.11 MB / 1.375 GB, free: 2.137 MB / 1.107 GB Notification: Performance of prepare postOptimizeDAE: time 0.0001195/1.462, allocations: 73.62 kB / 1.375 GB, free: 2.059 MB / 1.107 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyComplexFunction (initialization): time 0.0001424/1.462, allocations: 84 kB / 1.375 GB, free: 1.977 MB / 1.107 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt tearingSystem (initialization): time 0.001836/1.464, allocations: 0.7125 MB / 1.376 GB, free: 1.242 MB / 1.107 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt solveSimpleEquations (initialization): time 0.005789/1.47, allocations: 1.478 MB / 1.377 GB, free: 15.76 MB / 1.123 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt calculateStrongComponentJacobians (initialization): time 0.01257/1.482, allocations: 14.52 MB / 1.392 GB, free: 264 kB / 1.123 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyAllExpressions (initialization): time 0.009756/1.492, allocations: 1.182 MB / 1.393 GB, free: 15.07 MB / 1.139 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt collapseArrayExpressions (initialization): time 0.001376/1.493, allocations: 280 kB / 1.393 GB, free: 14.8 MB / 1.139 GB Warning: The initial conditions are over specified. The following 8 initial equations are redundant, so they are removed from the initialization system: sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3]) sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3]) sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3]) sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]). Notification: Performance of preBalanceInitialSystem (initialization_lambda0): time 0.01406/1.507, allocations: 7.088 MB / 1.4 GB, free: 7.699 MB / 1.139 GB Notification: Performance of partitionIndependentBlocks (initialization_lambda0): time 0.008149/1.516, allocations: 5.924 MB / 1.406 GB, free: 0.5703 MB / 1.139 GB Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3])) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3])) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3])) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3])) Notification: Performance of analyzeInitialSystem (initialization_lambda0): time 0.06125/1.577, allocations: 36.57 MB / 1.441 GB, free: 10.54 MB / 1.186 GB Notification: Performance of solveInitialSystemEqSystem (initialization_lambda0): time 8.649e-05/1.577, allocations: 28 kB / 1.442 GB, free: 10.52 MB / 1.186 GB Notification: Performance of matching and sorting (n=659) (initialization_lambda0): time 0.02263/1.6, allocations: 10.11 MB / 1.451 GB, free: 332 kB / 1.186 GB Notification: Performance of prepare postOptimizeDAE: time 0.0001234/1.6, allocations: 69.7 kB / 1.451 GB, free: 256 kB / 1.186 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyComplexFunction (initialization): time 0.0001559/1.6, allocations: 84 kB / 1.452 GB, free: 172 kB / 1.186 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt tearingSystem (initialization): time 0.001822/1.602, allocations: 0.7131 MB / 1.452 GB, free: 15.43 MB / 1.201 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt solveSimpleEquations (initialization): time 0.005755/1.608, allocations: 1.478 MB / 1.454 GB, free: 13.95 MB / 1.201 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt calculateStrongComponentJacobians (initialization): time 0.01269/1.62, allocations: 14.53 MB / 1.468 GB, free: 14.45 MB / 1.217 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyAllExpressions (initialization): time 0.01065/1.631, allocations: 1.189 MB / 1.469 GB, free: 13.26 MB / 1.217 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt collapseArrayExpressions (initialization): time 0.001474/1.632, allocations: 268 kB / 1.469 GB, free: 13 MB / 1.217 GB Warning: The initial conditions are over specified. The following 8 initial equations are redundant, so they are removed from the initialization_lambda0 system: sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3]) sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3]) sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3]) sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]). Notification: Model statistics after passing the back-end for initialization: * Number of independent subsystems: 384 * Number of states: 0 () * Number of discrete variables: 5 ($PRE.pulse.count,$PRE.pulse.T_start,pulse.count,pulse.T_start,$whenCondition1) * Number of discrete states: 0 () * Number of clocked states: 0 () * Top-level inputs: 0 Notification: Strong component statistics for initialization (635): * Single equations (assignments): 627 * Array equations: 0 * Algorithm blocks: 1 * Record equations: 0 * When equations: 0 * If-equations: 0 * Equation systems (not torn): 0 * Torn equation systems: 7 * Mixed (continuous/discrete) equation systems: 0 Notification: Torn system details for strict tearing set: * Linear torn systems (#iteration vars, #inner vars, density): 7 systems {(1,9,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,9,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%)} * Non-linear torn systems (#iteration vars, #inner vars): 0 systems Notification: Performance of prepare postOptimizeDAE: time 0.002667/1.635, allocations: 0.7614 MB / 1.47 GB, free: 12.22 MB / 1.217 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt lateInlineFunction (simulation): time 0.00306/1.638, allocations: 0.7023 MB / 1.471 GB, free: 11.52 MB / 1.217 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt wrapFunctionCalls (simulation): time 0.01088/1.649, allocations: 5.139 MB / 1.476 GB, free: 6.344 MB / 1.217 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt inlineArrayEqn (simulation): time 3.347e-05/1.649, allocations: 24 kB / 1.476 GB, free: 6.32 MB / 1.217 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt constantLinearSystem (simulation): time 2.335e-05/1.649, allocations: 7.984 kB / 1.476 GB, free: 6.312 MB / 1.217 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifysemiLinear (simulation): time 0.006235/1.655, allocations: 3.958 MB / 1.48 GB, free: 2.316 MB / 1.217 GB Warning: The model contains alias variables with redundant start and/or conflicting nominal values. It is recommended to resolve the conflicts, because otherwise the system could be hard to solve. To print the conflicting alias sets and the chosen candidates please use -d=aliasConflicts. Notification: Performance of postOpt removeSimpleEquations (simulation): time 0.03322/1.689, allocations: 13.43 MB / 1.493 GB, free: 4.66 MB / 1.232 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyComplexFunction (simulation): time 1.308e-05/1.689, allocations: 352 / 1.493 GB, free: 4.66 MB / 1.232 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt solveSimpleEquations (simulation): time 0.002818/1.692, allocations: 0.6046 MB / 1.493 GB, free: 4.055 MB / 1.232 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt tearingSystem (simulation): time 0.001537/1.693, allocations: 0.5756 MB / 1.494 GB, free: 3.457 MB / 1.232 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt inputDerivativesUsed (simulation): time 0.0004499/1.694, allocations: 135.9 kB / 1.494 GB, free: 3.324 MB / 1.232 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt calculateStrongComponentJacobians (simulation): time 0.0121/1.706, allocations: 14.39 MB / 1.508 GB, free: 3.953 MB / 1.248 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt calculateStateSetsJacobians (simulation): time 5.17e-06/1.706, allocations: 3.938 kB / 1.508 GB, free: 3.949 MB / 1.248 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt symbolicJacobian (simulation): time 0.0132/1.719, allocations: 7.157 MB / 1.515 GB, free: 12.71 MB / 1.264 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt removeConstants (simulation): time 0.005805/1.725, allocations: 1.695 MB / 1.517 GB, free: 10.99 MB / 1.264 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyTimeIndepFuncCalls (simulation): time 0.00249/1.727, allocations: 127.9 kB / 1.517 GB, free: 10.86 MB / 1.264 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyAllExpressions (simulation): time 0.005977/1.733, allocations: 0.6122 MB / 1.517 GB, free: 10.25 MB / 1.264 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt findZeroCrossings (simulation): time 0.000627/1.734, allocations: 169.6 kB / 1.518 GB, free: 10.09 MB / 1.264 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt collapseArrayExpressions (simulation): time 0.000356/1.734, allocations: 87.95 kB / 1.518 GB, free: 10 MB / 1.264 GB Notification: Performance of sorting global known variables: time 0.01657/1.751, allocations: 7.331 MB / 1.525 GB, free: 2.68 MB / 1.264 GB Notification: Performance of sort global known variables: time 3.61e-07/1.751, allocations: 4 kB / 1.525 GB, free: 2.676 MB / 1.264 GB Notification: Performance of remove unused functions: time 0.01986/1.771, allocations: 3.964 MB / 1.529 GB, free: 14.71 MB / 1.279 GB Notification: Model statistics after passing the back-end for simulation: * Number of independent subsystems: 12 * Number of states: 43 (sla.vol[1].dynBal.U,sla.vol[2].dynBal.U,sla.vol[3].dynBal.U,sla.vol[4].dynBal.U,sla.vol[5].dynBal.U,sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_b[1].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[2].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[3].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[4].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[5].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T[3],TOut.T) * Number of discrete variables: 3 ($whenCondition1,pulse.T_start,pulse.count) * Number of discrete states: 1 (pulse.count) * Number of clocked states: 0 () * Top-level inputs: 0 Notification: Strong component statistics for simulation (210): * Single equations (assignments): 199 * Array equations: 0 * Algorithm blocks: 0 * Record equations: 2 * When equations: 2 * If-equations: 0 * Equation systems (not torn): 0 * Torn equation systems: 7 * Mixed (continuous/discrete) equation systems: 0 Notification: Torn system details for strict tearing set: * Linear torn systems (#iteration vars, #inner vars, density): 7 systems {(1,9,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,9,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%)} * Non-linear torn systems (#iteration vars, #inner vars): 0 systems Notification: Performance of Backend phase and start with SimCode phase: time 0.002574/1.773, allocations: 0.5932 MB / 1.529 GB, free: 14.12 MB / 1.279 GB Notification: Performance of simCode: created initialization part: time 0.02524/1.799, allocations: 13.45 MB / 1.542 GB, free: 500 kB / 1.279 GB Notification: Performance of simCode: created event and clocks part: time 1.694e-05/1.799, allocations: 4 kB / 1.542 GB, free: 496 kB / 1.279 GB Notification: Performance of simCode: created simulation system equations: time 0.005651/1.804, allocations: 3.055 MB / 1.545 GB, free: 13.33 MB / 1.295 GB Notification: Performance of simCode: created of all other equations (e.g. parameter, nominal, assert, etc): time 0.01938/1.824, allocations: 2.935 MB / 1.548 GB, free: 10.44 MB / 1.295 GB Notification: Performance of simCode: created linear, non-linear and system jacobian parts: time 0.03927/1.863, allocations: 19 MB / 1.567 GB, free: 7.371 MB / 1.311 GB Notification: Performance of simCode: some other stuff during SimCode phase: time 0.01114/1.874, allocations: 5.373 MB / 1.572 GB, free: 1.953 MB / 1.311 GB Notification: Performance of simCode: alias equations: time 0.5693/2.444, allocations: 6.423 MB / 1.578 GB, free: 405.6 MB / 1.311 GB Notification: Performance of simCode: all other stuff during SimCode phase: time 0.003015/2.447, allocations: 430.5 kB / 1.579 GB, free: 405.6 MB / 1.311 GB Notification: Performance of SimCode: time 9.82e-07/2.447, allocations: 0 / 1.579 GB, free: 405.6 MB / 1.311 GB Notification: Performance of Templates: time 0.2024/2.649, allocations: 137.7 MB / 1.713 GB, free: 330 MB / 1.311 GB make -j1 -f Buildings_9_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference.makefile (rm -f Buildings_9_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference.pipe ; mkfifo Buildings_9_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference.pipe ; head -c 1048576 < Buildings_9_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference.pipe >> ../files/Buildings_9_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference.sim & ./Buildings_9_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference -abortSlowSimulation -alarm=480 -emit_protected -lv LOG_STATS > Buildings_9_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference.pipe 2>&1) diffSimulationResults("Buildings_9_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference_res.mat","/mnt/ReferenceFiles/Buildings/csv/maint_9.1.x/Buildings_Fluid_HeatExchangers_RadiantSlabs_Examples_StepResponseFiniteDifference.csv","/var/lib/jenkins/ws/OpenModelicaLibraryTestingWork/OpenModelicaLibraryTesting/files/Buildings_9_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference.diff",relTol=0.003,relTolDiffMinMax=0.003,rangeDelta=0.001) Reference file matches