Running: ./testmodel.py --libraries=/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries --ompython_omhome=/usr Buildings_9_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.conf.json
loadFile("/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/ModelicaServices 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo", uses=false)
loadFile("/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Complex 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo", uses=false)
loadFile("/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Modelica 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo", uses=false)
loadFile("/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Buildings 9.1.3-maint.9.1.x/package.mo", uses=false)
Using package Buildings with version 9.1.3 (/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Buildings 9.1.3-maint.9.1.x/package.mo)
Using package Modelica with version 4.0.0 (/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Modelica 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo)
Using package Complex with version 4.0.0 (/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Complex 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo)
Using package ModelicaServices with version 4.0.0 (/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/ModelicaServices 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo)
Running command: translateModel(Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU,tolerance=1e-06,outputFormat="mat",numberOfIntervals=5000,variableFilter="time|sla.sta_b.T|sla.surf_a.T|sla.surf_b.T|sla.surf_a.Q_flow|sla.surf_b.Q_flow",fileNamePrefix="Buildings_9_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU")
translateModel(Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU,tolerance=1e-06,outputFormat="mat",numberOfIntervals=5000,variableFilter="time|sla.sta_b.T|sla.surf_a.T|sla.surf_b.T|sla.surf_a.Q_flow|sla.surf_b.Q_flow",fileNamePrefix="Buildings_9_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU")
Notification: Performance of loadFile(/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/ModelicaServices 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo): time 0.006978/0.006978, allocations: 105.6 kB / 15.74 MB, free: 6.035 MB / 14.72 MB
Notification: Performance of loadFile(/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Complex 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo): time 0.001589/0.001589, allocations: 195.6 kB / 16.67 MB, free: 5.969 MB / 14.72 MB
Notification: Performance of loadFile(/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Modelica 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo): time 1.377/1.377, allocations: 222.9 MB / 240.4 MB, free: 4.18 MB / 190.1 MB
Notification: Performance of loadFile(/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Buildings 9.1.3-maint.9.1.x/package.mo): time 2.456/2.456, allocations: 390.2 MB / 0.6648 GB, free: 184 kB / 0.5137 GB
Notification: Performance of FrontEnd - loaded program: time 0.001472/0.001472, allocations: 63.84 kB / 0.9509 GB, free: 5.531 MB / 0.7169 GB
Notification: Performance of FrontEnd - Absyn->SCode: time 0.29/0.2915, allocations: 140.4 MB / 1.088 GB, free: 1.469 MB / 0.8419 GB
Notification: Performance of NFInst.instantiate(Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU): time 0.03062/0.3222, allocations: 31.75 MB / 1.119 GB, free: 1.598 MB / 0.8731 GB
Notification: Performance of NFInst.instExpressions: time 0.01795/0.3402, allocations: 12.29 MB / 1.131 GB, free: 5.273 MB / 0.8887 GB
Notification: Performance of NFInst.updateImplicitVariability: time 0.00223/0.3424, allocations: 63.62 kB / 1.131 GB, free: 5.211 MB / 0.8887 GB
Notification: Performance of NFTyping.typeComponents: time 0.002954/0.3454, allocations: 1.104 MB / 1.132 GB, free: 4.102 MB / 0.8887 GB
Notification: Performance of NFTyping.typeBindings: time 0.005502/0.351, allocations: 2.079 MB / 1.134 GB, free: 2.016 MB / 0.8887 GB
Notification: Performance of NFTyping.typeClassSections: time 0.004823/0.3558, allocations: 1.871 MB / 1.136 GB, free: 156 kB / 0.8887 GB
Notification: Performance of NFFlatten.flatten: time 0.01846/0.3743, allocations: 19.55 MB / 1.155 GB, free: 12.56 MB / 0.92 GB
Notification: Performance of NFFlatten.resolveConnections: time 0.009208/0.3835, allocations: 7.193 MB / 1.162 GB, free: 5.289 MB / 0.92 GB
Notification: Performance of NFEvalConstants.evaluate: time 0.01178/0.3953, allocations: 6.529 MB / 1.168 GB, free: 14.76 MB / 0.9356 GB
Notification: Performance of NFSimplifyModel.simplify: time 0.008985/0.4043, allocations: 5.364 MB / 1.174 GB, free: 9.379 MB / 0.9356 GB
Notification: Performance of NFPackage.collectConstants: time 0.002193/0.4065, allocations: 0.75 MB / 1.174 GB, free: 8.629 MB / 0.9356 GB
Notification: Performance of NFFlatten.collectFunctions: time 0.007539/0.4141, allocations: 3.215 MB / 1.178 GB, free: 5.41 MB / 0.9356 GB
Notification: Performance of NFScalarize.scalarize: time 0.003528/0.4176, allocations: 3.003 MB / 1.18 GB, free: 2.398 MB / 0.9356 GB
Notification: Performance of NFVerifyModel.verify: time 0.007377/0.425, allocations: 4.756 MB / 1.185 GB, free: 13.62 MB / 0.9512 GB
Notification: Performance of NFConvertDAE.convert: time 0.01701/0.442, allocations: 15.42 MB / 1.2 GB, free: 14.15 MB / 0.9669 GB
Notification: Performance of FrontEnd - DAE generated: time 5.821e-06/0.4421, allocations: 0 / 1.2 GB, free: 14.15 MB / 0.9669 GB
Notification: Performance of FrontEnd: time 1.433e-06/0.4421, allocations: 0 / 1.2 GB, free: 14.15 MB / 0.9669 GB
Notification: Performance of Transformations before backend: time 0.0003462/0.4425, allocations: 0 / 1.2 GB, free: 14.15 MB / 0.9669 GB
Notification: Model statistics after passing the front-end and creating the data structures used by the back-end:
 * Number of equations: 866
 * Number of variables: 866
Notification: Performance of Generate backend data structure: time 0.02589/0.4684, allocations: 11.5 MB / 1.211 GB, free: 2.543 MB / 0.9669 GB
Notification: Performance of prepare preOptimizeDAE: time 3.753e-05/0.4684, allocations: 8.031 kB / 1.211 GB, free: 2.535 MB / 0.9669 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt normalInlineFunction (simulation): time 0.002281/0.4707, allocations: 0.8803 MB / 1.212 GB, free: 1.645 MB / 0.9669 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt evaluateParameters (simulation): time 0.01845/0.4892, allocations: 9.613 MB / 1.222 GB, free: 7.953 MB / 0.9825 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt simplifyIfEquations (simulation): time 0.0002299/0.4894, allocations: 330.8 kB / 1.222 GB, free: 7.629 MB / 0.9825 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt expandDerOperator (simulation): time 0.0009557/0.4904, allocations: 483.8 kB / 1.222 GB, free: 7.156 MB / 0.9825 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt clockPartitioning (simulation): time 0.008884/0.4993, allocations: 5.956 MB / 1.228 GB, free: 0.9648 MB / 0.9825 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt findStateOrder (simulation): time 7.553e-05/0.4994, allocations: 15.88 kB / 1.228 GB, free: 0.9492 MB / 0.9825 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt replaceEdgeChange (simulation): time 0.0003534/0.4997, allocations: 143.9 kB / 1.228 GB, free: 0.8086 MB / 0.9825 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt inlineArrayEqn (simulation): time 8.416e-05/0.4998, allocations: 107.9 kB / 1.229 GB, free: 0.7031 MB / 0.9825 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt removeEqualRHS (simulation): time 0.007048/0.5069, allocations: 4.758 MB / 1.233 GB, free: 11.93 MB / 0.9981 GB
Warning: The model contains alias variables with redundant start and/or conflicting nominal values. It is recommended to resolve the conflicts, because otherwise the system could be hard to solve. To print the conflicting alias sets and the chosen candidates please use -d=aliasConflicts.
Notification: Performance of preOpt removeSimpleEquations (simulation): time 0.7444/1.251, allocations: 33.76 MB / 1.266 GB, free: 140.8 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt comSubExp (simulation): time 0.01384/1.265, allocations: 6.227 MB / 1.272 GB, free: 139.7 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt resolveLoops (simulation): time 0.004767/1.27, allocations: 2.553 MB / 1.275 GB, free: 139 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt evalFunc (simulation): time 0.02631/1.296, allocations: 13.23 MB / 1.288 GB, free: 133 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt encapsulateWhenConditions (simulation): time 0.003239/1.3, allocations: 2.143 MB / 1.29 GB, free: 132.4 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of pre-optimization done (n=224): time 5.45e-06/1.3, allocations: 0 / 1.29 GB, free: 132.4 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of matching and sorting (n=232): time 0.03042/1.33, allocations: 14.01 MB / 1.303 GB, free: 125.6 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of inlineWhenForInitialization (initialization): time 6.852e-05/1.33, allocations: 128.1 kB / 1.304 GB, free: 125.4 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of selectInitializationVariablesDAE (initialization): time 0.01881/1.349, allocations: 10.43 MB / 1.314 GB, free: 120.3 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of collectPreVariables (initialization): time 0.001112/1.35, allocations: 117 kB / 1.314 GB, free: 120.2 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of collectInitialEqns (initialization): time 0.003944/1.354, allocations: 3.3 MB / 1.317 GB, free: 117.4 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of collectInitialBindings (initialization): time 0.00277/1.357, allocations: 0.8715 MB / 1.318 GB, free: 116.7 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of simplifyInitialFunctions (initialization): time 0.006693/1.364, allocations: 1.211 MB / 1.319 GB, free: 116.1 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of setup shared object (initialization): time 8.841e-05/1.364, allocations: 309.1 kB / 1.319 GB, free: 115.8 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of preBalanceInitialSystem (initialization): time 0.006451/1.37, allocations: 3.446 MB / 1.323 GB, free: 114 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of partitionIndependentBlocks (initialization): time 0.006293/1.376, allocations: 5.935 MB / 1.329 GB, free: 108.4 MB / 1.014 GB
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3]))
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3]))
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3]))
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]))
Notification: Performance of analyzeInitialSystem (initialization): time 0.05147/1.428, allocations: 36.64 MB / 1.364 GB, free: 70.41 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of solveInitialSystemEqSystem (initialization): time 8.772e-05/1.428, allocations: 24 kB / 1.364 GB, free: 70.39 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of matching and sorting (n=659) (initialization): time 0.01911/1.447, allocations: 10.08 MB / 1.374 GB, free: 60.22 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of prepare postOptimizeDAE: time 0.0001311/1.447, allocations: 65.7 kB / 1.374 GB, free: 60.15 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyComplexFunction (initialization): time 0.0001548/1.448, allocations: 84 kB / 1.374 GB, free: 60.07 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt tearingSystem (initialization): time 0.001667/1.449, allocations: 0.7123 MB / 1.375 GB, free: 59.33 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt solveSimpleEquations (initialization): time 0.005273/1.455, allocations: 1.474 MB / 1.376 GB, free: 57.86 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt calculateStrongComponentJacobians (initialization): time 0.009144/1.464, allocations: 14.52 MB / 1.391 GB, free: 42.39 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyAllExpressions (initialization): time 0.009759/1.474, allocations: 1.178 MB / 1.392 GB, free: 41.21 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt collapseArrayExpressions (initialization): time 0.001383/1.475, allocations: 282.3 kB / 1.392 GB, free: 40.93 MB / 1.014 GB
Warning: The initial conditions are over specified. The following 8 initial equations are redundant, so they are removed from the initialization system:
         sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start
         sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start
         sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start
         sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start
         sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3])
         sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3])
         sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3])
         sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]).
Notification: Performance of preBalanceInitialSystem (initialization_lambda0): time 0.01096/1.486, allocations: 7.101 MB / 1.399 GB, free: 33.82 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of partitionIndependentBlocks (initialization_lambda0): time 0.006309/1.492, allocations: 5.93 MB / 1.405 GB, free: 26.69 MB / 1.014 GB
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3]))
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3]))
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3]))
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]))
Notification: Performance of analyzeInitialSystem (initialization_lambda0): time 0.05479/1.547, allocations: 36.56 MB / 1.44 GB, free: 4.691 MB / 1.029 GB
Notification: Performance of solveInitialSystemEqSystem (initialization_lambda0): time 8.406e-05/1.547, allocations: 24 kB / 1.441 GB, free: 4.668 MB / 1.029 GB
Notification: Performance of matching and sorting (n=659) (initialization_lambda0): time 0.02061/1.568, allocations: 10.08 MB / 1.45 GB, free: 10.5 MB / 1.045 GB
Notification: Performance of prepare postOptimizeDAE: time 0.0001105/1.568, allocations: 69.7 kB / 1.45 GB, free: 10.43 MB / 1.045 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyComplexFunction (initialization): time 0.0001404/1.568, allocations: 84 kB / 1.451 GB, free: 10.35 MB / 1.045 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt tearingSystem (initialization): time 0.001868/1.57, allocations: 0.7112 MB / 1.451 GB, free: 9.617 MB / 1.045 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt solveSimpleEquations (initialization): time 0.005533/1.576, allocations: 1.482 MB / 1.453 GB, free: 8.133 MB / 1.045 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt calculateStrongComponentJacobians (initialization): time 0.01248/1.588, allocations: 14.51 MB / 1.467 GB, free: 8.668 MB / 1.061 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyAllExpressions (initialization): time 0.009876/1.598, allocations: 1.193 MB / 1.468 GB, free: 7.473 MB / 1.061 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt collapseArrayExpressions (initialization): time 0.001214/1.599, allocations: 276 kB / 1.468 GB, free: 7.203 MB / 1.061 GB
Warning: The initial conditions are over specified. The following 8 initial equations are redundant, so they are removed from the initialization_lambda0 system:
         sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start
         sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start
         sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start
         sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start
         sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3])
         sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3])
         sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3])
         sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]).
Notification: Model statistics after passing the back-end for initialization:
 * Number of independent subsystems: 384
 * Number of states: 0 ()
 * Number of discrete variables: 5 ($PRE.pulse.count,$PRE.pulse.T_start,pulse.count,pulse.T_start,$whenCondition1)
 * Number of discrete states: 0 ()
 * Number of clocked states: 0 ()
 * Top-level inputs: 0
Notification: Strong component statistics for initialization (635):
 * Single equations (assignments): 627
 * Array equations: 0
 * Algorithm blocks: 1
 * Record equations: 0
 * When equations: 0
 * If-equations: 0
 * Equation systems (not torn): 0
 * Torn equation systems: 7
 * Mixed (continuous/discrete) equation systems: 0
Notification: Torn system details for strict tearing set:
 * Linear torn systems (#iteration vars, #inner vars, density): 7 systems
   {(1,9,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,9,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%)}
 * Non-linear torn systems (#iteration vars, #inner vars): 0 systems
Notification: Performance of prepare postOptimizeDAE: time 0.002253/1.601, allocations: 0.7553 MB / 1.469 GB, free: 6.43 MB / 1.061 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt lateInlineFunction (simulation): time 0.002975/1.604, allocations: 0.6595 MB / 1.47 GB, free: 5.762 MB / 1.061 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt wrapFunctionCalls (simulation): time 0.01045/1.615, allocations: 5.154 MB / 1.475 GB, free: 0.5742 MB / 1.061 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt inlineArrayEqn (simulation): time 3.18e-05/1.615, allocations: 27.94 kB / 1.475 GB, free: 0.5469 MB / 1.061 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt constantLinearSystem (simulation): time 2.223e-05/1.615, allocations: 4 kB / 1.475 GB, free: 0.543 MB / 1.061 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifysemiLinear (simulation): time 0.005952/1.621, allocations: 3.958 MB / 1.479 GB, free: 12.55 MB / 1.076 GB
Warning: The model contains alias variables with redundant start and/or conflicting nominal values. It is recommended to resolve the conflicts, because otherwise the system could be hard to solve. To print the conflicting alias sets and the chosen candidates please use -d=aliasConflicts.
Notification: Performance of postOpt removeSimpleEquations (simulation): time 0.03041/1.651, allocations: 13.41 MB / 1.492 GB, free: 14.96 MB / 1.092 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyComplexFunction (simulation): time 1.341e-05/1.651, allocations: 0 / 1.492 GB, free: 14.96 MB / 1.092 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt solveSimpleEquations (simulation): time 0.002603/1.654, allocations: 0.6049 MB / 1.492 GB, free: 14.36 MB / 1.092 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt tearingSystem (simulation): time 0.001516/1.656, allocations: 0.5756 MB / 1.493 GB, free: 13.76 MB / 1.092 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt inputDerivativesUsed (simulation): time 0.0003938/1.656, allocations: 139.8 kB / 1.493 GB, free: 13.62 MB / 1.092 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt calculateStrongComponentJacobians (simulation): time 0.01161/1.668, allocations: 14.39 MB / 1.507 GB, free: 14.27 MB / 1.107 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt calculateStateSetsJacobians (simulation): time 6.212e-06/1.668, allocations: 8.031 kB / 1.507 GB, free: 14.27 MB / 1.107 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt symbolicJacobian (simulation): time 0.01197/1.68, allocations: 7.117 MB / 1.514 GB, free: 7.062 MB / 1.107 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt removeConstants (simulation): time 0.004966/1.685, allocations: 1.664 MB / 1.516 GB, free: 5.371 MB / 1.107 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyTimeIndepFuncCalls (simulation): time 0.002408/1.687, allocations: 123.9 kB / 1.516 GB, free: 5.25 MB / 1.107 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyAllExpressions (simulation): time 0.005759/1.693, allocations: 0.6238 MB / 1.516 GB, free: 4.625 MB / 1.107 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt findZeroCrossings (simulation): time 0.0005078/1.693, allocations: 161.7 kB / 1.516 GB, free: 4.465 MB / 1.107 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt collapseArrayExpressions (simulation): time 0.0002785/1.694, allocations: 83.95 kB / 1.517 GB, free: 4.383 MB / 1.107 GB
Notification: Performance of sorting global known variables: time 0.0156/1.709, allocations: 7.339 MB / 1.524 GB, free: 13.05 MB / 1.123 GB
Notification: Performance of sort global known variables: time 2.31e-07/1.709, allocations: 0 / 1.524 GB, free: 13.05 MB / 1.123 GB
Notification: Performance of remove unused functions: time 0.01802/1.727, allocations: 3.961 MB / 1.528 GB, free: 9.121 MB / 1.123 GB
Notification: Model statistics after passing the back-end for simulation:
 * Number of independent subsystems: 12
 * Number of states: 43 (sla.vol[1].dynBal.U,sla.vol[2].dynBal.U,sla.vol[3].dynBal.U,sla.vol[4].dynBal.U,sla.vol[5].dynBal.U,sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_b[1].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[2].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[3].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[4].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[5].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T[3],TOut.T)
 * Number of discrete variables: 3 ($whenCondition1,pulse.T_start,pulse.count)
 * Number of discrete states: 1 (pulse.count)
 * Number of clocked states: 0 ()
 * Top-level inputs: 0
Notification: Strong component statistics for simulation (210):
 * Single equations (assignments): 199
 * Array equations: 0
 * Algorithm blocks: 0
 * Record equations: 2
 * When equations: 2
 * If-equations: 0
 * Equation systems (not torn): 0
 * Torn equation systems: 7
 * Mixed (continuous/discrete) equation systems: 0
Notification: Torn system details for strict tearing set:
 * Linear torn systems (#iteration vars, #inner vars, density): 7 systems
   {(1,9,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,9,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%)}
 * Non-linear torn systems (#iteration vars, #inner vars): 0 systems
Notification: Performance of Backend phase and start with SimCode phase: time 0.002102/1.729, allocations: 0.5936 MB / 1.528 GB, free: 8.59 MB / 1.123 GB
Notification: Performance of simCode: created initialization part: time 0.02079/1.75, allocations: 13.44 MB / 1.541 GB, free: 10.98 MB / 1.139 GB
Notification: Performance of simCode: created event and clocks part: time 9.037e-06/1.75, allocations: 0 / 1.541 GB, free: 10.98 MB / 1.139 GB
Notification: Performance of simCode: created simulation system equations: time 0.004634/1.755, allocations: 3.044 MB / 1.544 GB, free: 7.844 MB / 1.139 GB
Notification: Performance of simCode: created of all other equations (e.g. parameter, nominal, assert, etc): time 0.01682/1.772, allocations: 2.94 MB / 1.547 GB, free: 4.945 MB / 1.139 GB
Notification: Performance of simCode: created linear, non-linear and system jacobian parts: time 0.0335/1.805, allocations: 18.77 MB / 1.565 GB, free: 2.16 MB / 1.154 GB
Notification: Performance of simCode: some other stuff during SimCode phase: time 0.008063/1.813, allocations: 5.365 MB / 1.571 GB, free: 12.76 MB / 1.17 GB
Notification: Performance of simCode: alias equations: time 0.01618/1.83, allocations: 6.429 MB / 1.577 GB, free: 6.344 MB / 1.17 GB
Notification: Performance of simCode: all other stuff during SimCode phase: time 0.003181/1.833, allocations: 431.3 kB / 1.577 GB, free: 5.922 MB / 1.17 GB
Notification: Performance of SimCode: time 1.502e-06/1.833, allocations: 0 / 1.577 GB, free: 5.922 MB / 1.17 GB
Notification: Performance of Templates: time 0.2179/2.051, allocations: 139.3 MB / 1.713 GB, free: 11.91 MB / 1.311 GB
make -j1 -f Buildings_9_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.makefile
(rm -f Buildings_9_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.pipe ; mkfifo Buildings_9_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.pipe ; head -c 1048576 < Buildings_9_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.pipe >> ../files/Buildings_9_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.sim & ./Buildings_9_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU  -abortSlowSimulation -alarm=480  -emit_protected -lv LOG_STATS > Buildings_9_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.pipe 2>&1)
diffSimulationResults("Buildings_9_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU_res.mat","/mnt/ReferenceFiles/Buildings/csv/maint_9.1.x/Buildings_Fluid_HeatExchangers_RadiantSlabs_Examples_StepResponseEpsilonNTU.csv","/var/lib/jenkins/ws/OpenModelicaLibraryTestingWork/OpenModelicaLibraryTesting/files/Buildings_9_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.diff",relTol=0.003,relTolDiffMinMax=0.003,rangeDelta=0.001)
Reference file matches