Running: ./testmodel.py --libraries=/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries --ompython_omhome=/usr Buildings_9_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.conf.json loadFile("/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/ModelicaServices 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo", uses=false) loadFile("/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Complex 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo", uses=false) loadFile("/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Modelica 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo", uses=false) loadFile("/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Buildings 9.1.3-maint.9.1.x/package.mo", uses=false) Using package Buildings with version 9.1.3 (/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Buildings 9.1.3-maint.9.1.x/package.mo) Using package Modelica with version 4.0.0 (/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Modelica 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo) Using package Complex with version 4.0.0 (/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Complex 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo) Using package ModelicaServices with version 4.0.0 (/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/ModelicaServices 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo) Running command: translateModel(Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU,tolerance=1e-06,outputFormat="mat",numberOfIntervals=5000,variableFilter="time|sla.sta_b.T|sla.surf_a.T|sla.surf_b.T|sla.surf_a.Q_flow|sla.surf_b.Q_flow",fileNamePrefix="Buildings_9_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU") translateModel(Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU,tolerance=1e-06,outputFormat="mat",numberOfIntervals=5000,variableFilter="time|sla.sta_b.T|sla.surf_a.T|sla.surf_b.T|sla.surf_a.Q_flow|sla.surf_b.Q_flow",fileNamePrefix="Buildings_9_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU") Notification: Performance of loadFile(/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/ModelicaServices 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo): time 0.007736/0.007736, allocations: 96.7 kB / 15.73 MB, free: 6.047 MB / 14.72 MB Notification: Performance of loadFile(/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Complex 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo): time 0.001628/0.001628, allocations: 194.3 kB / 16.67 MB, free: 5.973 MB / 14.72 MB Notification: Performance of loadFile(/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Modelica 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo): time 1.395/1.395, allocations: 222.9 MB / 240.4 MB, free: 4.312 MB / 190.1 MB Notification: Performance of loadFile(/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Buildings 9.1.3-maint.9.1.x/package.mo): time 2.425/2.425, allocations: 390.2 MB / 0.6648 GB, free: 224 kB / 0.5137 GB Notification: Performance of FrontEnd - loaded program: time 0.001253/0.001253, allocations: 63.88 kB / 0.9509 GB, free: 5.469 MB / 0.7169 GB Notification: Performance of FrontEnd - Absyn->SCode: time 0.2656/0.2668, allocations: 140.4 MB / 1.088 GB, free: 1.473 MB / 0.8419 GB Notification: Performance of NFInst.instantiate(Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU): time 0.03385/0.3007, allocations: 31.76 MB / 1.119 GB, free: 1.598 MB / 0.8731 GB Notification: Performance of NFInst.instExpressions: time 0.01984/0.3206, allocations: 12.28 MB / 1.131 GB, free: 5.281 MB / 0.8887 GB Notification: Performance of NFInst.updateImplicitVariability: time 0.002652/0.3233, allocations: 71.56 kB / 1.131 GB, free: 5.211 MB / 0.8887 GB Notification: Performance of NFTyping.typeComponents: time 0.003545/0.3269, allocations: 1.115 MB / 1.132 GB, free: 4.09 MB / 0.8887 GB Notification: Performance of NFTyping.typeBindings: time 0.006202/0.3331, allocations: 2.146 MB / 1.134 GB, free: 1.938 MB / 0.8887 GB Notification: Performance of NFTyping.typeClassSections: time 0.005584/0.3387, allocations: 1.876 MB / 1.136 GB, free: 68 kB / 0.8887 GB Notification: Performance of NFFlatten.flatten: time 0.02116/0.3599, allocations: 19.57 MB / 1.155 GB, free: 12.45 MB / 0.92 GB Notification: Performance of NFFlatten.resolveConnections: time 0.01032/0.3703, allocations: 7.197 MB / 1.162 GB, free: 5.18 MB / 0.92 GB Notification: Performance of NFEvalConstants.evaluate: time 0.01261/0.3829, allocations: 6.539 MB / 1.169 GB, free: 14.64 MB / 0.9356 GB Notification: Performance of NFSimplifyModel.simplify: time 0.009382/0.3923, allocations: 5.356 MB / 1.174 GB, free: 9.266 MB / 0.9356 GB Notification: Performance of NFPackage.collectConstants: time 0.002553/0.3949, allocations: 0.7461 MB / 1.175 GB, free: 8.52 MB / 0.9356 GB Notification: Performance of NFFlatten.collectFunctions: time 0.008436/0.4033, allocations: 3.219 MB / 1.178 GB, free: 5.297 MB / 0.9356 GB Notification: Performance of NFScalarize.scalarize: time 0.004988/0.4083, allocations: 3 MB / 1.181 GB, free: 2.289 MB / 0.9356 GB Notification: Performance of NFVerifyModel.verify: time 0.01393/0.4223, allocations: 4.749 MB / 1.185 GB, free: 13.52 MB / 0.9512 GB Notification: Performance of NFConvertDAE.convert: time 0.02625/0.4486, allocations: 15.48 MB / 1.2 GB, free: 13.99 MB / 0.9669 GB Notification: Performance of FrontEnd - DAE generated: time 8.526e-06/0.4486, allocations: 0 / 1.2 GB, free: 13.99 MB / 0.9669 GB Notification: Performance of FrontEnd: time 2.635e-06/0.4487, allocations: 0 / 1.2 GB, free: 13.99 MB / 0.9669 GB Notification: Performance of Transformations before backend: time 0.0004816/0.4491, allocations: 0 / 1.2 GB, free: 13.99 MB / 0.9669 GB Notification: Model statistics after passing the front-end and creating the data structures used by the back-end: * Number of equations: 866 * Number of variables: 866 Notification: Performance of Generate backend data structure: time 0.03052/0.4797, allocations: 11.76 MB / 1.212 GB, free: 2.113 MB / 0.9669 GB Notification: Performance of prepare preOptimizeDAE: time 4.524e-05/0.4797, allocations: 8.031 kB / 1.212 GB, free: 2.105 MB / 0.9669 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt normalInlineFunction (simulation): time 0.003352/0.4831, allocations: 0.9279 MB / 1.213 GB, free: 1.172 MB / 0.9669 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt evaluateParameters (simulation): time 0.02094/0.504, allocations: 9.667 MB / 1.222 GB, free: 7.434 MB / 0.9825 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt simplifyIfEquations (simulation): time 0.0003882/0.5045, allocations: 334.8 kB / 1.223 GB, free: 7.105 MB / 0.9825 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt expandDerOperator (simulation): time 0.001897/0.5064, allocations: 487.9 kB / 1.223 GB, free: 6.629 MB / 0.9825 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt clockPartitioning (simulation): time 0.01133/0.5177, allocations: 5.956 MB / 1.229 GB, free: 448 kB / 0.9825 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt findStateOrder (simulation): time 8.318e-05/0.5178, allocations: 19.88 kB / 1.229 GB, free: 428 kB / 0.9825 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt replaceEdgeChange (simulation): time 0.0004055/0.5183, allocations: 151.9 kB / 1.229 GB, free: 276 kB / 0.9825 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt inlineArrayEqn (simulation): time 8.89e-05/0.5184, allocations: 95.92 kB / 1.229 GB, free: 180 kB / 0.9825 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt removeEqualRHS (simulation): time 0.007309/0.5257, allocations: 4.762 MB / 1.234 GB, free: 11.4 MB / 0.9981 GB Warning: The model contains alias variables with redundant start and/or conflicting nominal values. It is recommended to resolve the conflicts, because otherwise the system could be hard to solve. To print the conflicting alias sets and the chosen candidates please use -d=aliasConflicts. Notification: Performance of preOpt removeSimpleEquations (simulation): time 0.7756/1.301, allocations: 33.79 MB / 1.267 GB, free: 142.2 MB / 1.014 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt comSubExp (simulation): time 0.01402/1.315, allocations: 6.23 MB / 1.273 GB, free: 141.1 MB / 1.014 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt resolveLoops (simulation): time 0.004702/1.32, allocations: 2.55 MB / 1.275 GB, free: 140.3 MB / 1.014 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt evalFunc (simulation): time 0.02752/1.348, allocations: 13.25 MB / 1.288 GB, free: 134.4 MB / 1.014 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt encapsulateWhenConditions (simulation): time 0.003081/1.351, allocations: 2.138 MB / 1.29 GB, free: 133.7 MB / 1.014 GB Notification: Performance of pre-optimization done (n=224): time 4.578e-06/1.351, allocations: 1.531 kB / 1.29 GB, free: 133.7 MB / 1.014 GB Notification: Performance of matching and sorting (n=232): time 0.02814/1.379, allocations: 14.28 MB / 1.304 GB, free: 126.9 MB / 1.014 GB Notification: Performance of inlineWhenForInitialization (initialization): time 6.349e-05/1.379, allocations: 131.2 kB / 1.304 GB, free: 126.8 MB / 1.014 GB Notification: Performance of selectInitializationVariablesDAE (initialization): time 0.01781/1.397, allocations: 10.43 MB / 1.315 GB, free: 121.6 MB / 1.014 GB Notification: Performance of collectPreVariables (initialization): time 0.0008893/1.398, allocations: 116.6 kB / 1.315 GB, free: 121.5 MB / 1.014 GB Notification: Performance of collectInitialEqns (initialization): time 0.003496/1.401, allocations: 3.344 MB / 1.318 GB, free: 118.8 MB / 1.014 GB Notification: Performance of collectInitialBindings (initialization): time 0.001752/1.403, allocations: 0.9133 MB / 1.319 GB, free: 118 MB / 1.014 GB Notification: Performance of simplifyInitialFunctions (initialization): time 0.001943/1.405, allocations: 1.213 MB / 1.32 GB, free: 117.4 MB / 1.014 GB Notification: Performance of setup shared object (initialization): time 5.001e-05/1.405, allocations: 304.7 kB / 1.32 GB, free: 117.1 MB / 1.014 GB Notification: Performance of preBalanceInitialSystem (initialization): time 0.003955/1.409, allocations: 3.451 MB / 1.324 GB, free: 115.4 MB / 1.014 GB Notification: Performance of partitionIndependentBlocks (initialization): time 0.004915/1.414, allocations: 5.936 MB / 1.329 GB, free: 110.2 MB / 1.014 GB Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3])) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3])) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3])) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3])) Notification: Performance of analyzeInitialSystem (initialization): time 0.04328/1.457, allocations: 36.64 MB / 1.365 GB, free: 72.22 MB / 1.014 GB Notification: Performance of solveInitialSystemEqSystem (initialization): time 7.692e-05/1.457, allocations: 24 kB / 1.365 GB, free: 72.2 MB / 1.014 GB Notification: Performance of matching and sorting (n=659) (initialization): time 0.01419/1.472, allocations: 10.11 MB / 1.375 GB, free: 62.01 MB / 1.014 GB Notification: Performance of prepare postOptimizeDAE: time 7.692e-05/1.472, allocations: 73.77 kB / 1.375 GB, free: 61.93 MB / 1.014 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyComplexFunction (initialization): time 0.0001032/1.472, allocations: 84 kB / 1.375 GB, free: 61.85 MB / 1.014 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt tearingSystem (initialization): time 0.001492/1.473, allocations: 0.7084 MB / 1.376 GB, free: 61.12 MB / 1.014 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt solveSimpleEquations (initialization): time 0.004556/1.478, allocations: 1.481 MB / 1.377 GB, free: 59.64 MB / 1.014 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt calculateStrongComponentJacobians (initialization): time 0.008708/1.487, allocations: 14.53 MB / 1.392 GB, free: 44.16 MB / 1.014 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyAllExpressions (initialization): time 0.01042/1.497, allocations: 1.178 MB / 1.393 GB, free: 42.98 MB / 1.014 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt collapseArrayExpressions (initialization): time 0.001331/1.498, allocations: 284 kB / 1.393 GB, free: 42.7 MB / 1.014 GB Warning: The initial conditions are over specified. The following 8 initial equations are redundant, so they are removed from the initialization system: sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3]) sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3]) sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3]) sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]). Notification: Performance of preBalanceInitialSystem (initialization_lambda0): time 0.01213/1.51, allocations: 7.089 MB / 1.4 GB, free: 35.6 MB / 1.014 GB Notification: Performance of partitionIndependentBlocks (initialization_lambda0): time 0.006246/1.517, allocations: 5.932 MB / 1.406 GB, free: 28.46 MB / 1.014 GB Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3])) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3])) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3])) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3])) Notification: Performance of analyzeInitialSystem (initialization_lambda0): time 0.05142/1.568, allocations: 36.57 MB / 1.441 GB, free: 6.461 MB / 1.029 GB Notification: Performance of solveInitialSystemEqSystem (initialization_lambda0): time 8.855e-05/1.568, allocations: 24 kB / 1.441 GB, free: 6.438 MB / 1.029 GB Notification: Performance of matching and sorting (n=659) (initialization_lambda0): time 0.01973/1.588, allocations: 10.11 MB / 1.451 GB, free: 12.25 MB / 1.045 GB Notification: Performance of prepare postOptimizeDAE: time 0.0001426/1.588, allocations: 65.7 kB / 1.451 GB, free: 12.18 MB / 1.045 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyComplexFunction (initialization): time 0.0002022/1.588, allocations: 84 kB / 1.452 GB, free: 12.09 MB / 1.045 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt tearingSystem (initialization): time 0.002029/1.591, allocations: 0.7126 MB / 1.452 GB, free: 11.36 MB / 1.045 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt solveSimpleEquations (initialization): time 0.005648/1.596, allocations: 1.478 MB / 1.454 GB, free: 9.879 MB / 1.045 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt calculateStrongComponentJacobians (initialization): time 0.01241/1.609, allocations: 14.53 MB / 1.468 GB, free: 10.4 MB / 1.061 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyAllExpressions (initialization): time 0.009985/1.619, allocations: 1.186 MB / 1.469 GB, free: 9.215 MB / 1.061 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt collapseArrayExpressions (initialization): time 0.001416/1.62, allocations: 276 kB / 1.469 GB, free: 8.945 MB / 1.061 GB Warning: The initial conditions are over specified. The following 8 initial equations are redundant, so they are removed from the initialization_lambda0 system: sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3]) sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3]) sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3]) sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]). Notification: Model statistics after passing the back-end for initialization: * Number of independent subsystems: 384 * Number of states: 0 () * Number of discrete variables: 5 ($PRE.pulse.count,$PRE.pulse.T_start,pulse.count,pulse.T_start,$whenCondition1) * Number of discrete states: 0 () * Number of clocked states: 0 () * Top-level inputs: 0 Notification: Strong component statistics for initialization (635): * Single equations (assignments): 627 * Array equations: 0 * Algorithm blocks: 1 * Record equations: 0 * When equations: 0 * If-equations: 0 * Equation systems (not torn): 0 * Torn equation systems: 7 * Mixed (continuous/discrete) equation systems: 0 Notification: Torn system details for strict tearing set: * Linear torn systems (#iteration vars, #inner vars, density): 7 systems {(1,9,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,9,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%)} * Non-linear torn systems (#iteration vars, #inner vars): 0 systems Notification: Performance of prepare postOptimizeDAE: time 0.002522/1.623, allocations: 0.7564 MB / 1.47 GB, free: 8.172 MB / 1.061 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt lateInlineFunction (simulation): time 0.003034/1.626, allocations: 0.7023 MB / 1.471 GB, free: 7.465 MB / 1.061 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt wrapFunctionCalls (simulation): time 0.009995/1.636, allocations: 5.155 MB / 1.476 GB, free: 2.277 MB / 1.061 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt inlineArrayEqn (simulation): time 2.604e-05/1.636, allocations: 20 kB / 1.476 GB, free: 2.258 MB / 1.061 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt constantLinearSystem (simulation): time 1.917e-05/1.636, allocations: 8 kB / 1.476 GB, free: 2.25 MB / 1.061 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifysemiLinear (simulation): time 0.005923/1.642, allocations: 3.963 MB / 1.48 GB, free: 14.25 MB / 1.076 GB Warning: The model contains alias variables with redundant start and/or conflicting nominal values. It is recommended to resolve the conflicts, because otherwise the system could be hard to solve. To print the conflicting alias sets and the chosen candidates please use -d=aliasConflicts. Notification: Performance of postOpt removeSimpleEquations (simulation): time 0.03219/1.674, allocations: 13.41 MB / 1.493 GB, free: 0.6641 MB / 1.076 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyComplexFunction (simulation): time 1.358e-05/1.674, allocations: 4 kB / 1.493 GB, free: 0.6602 MB / 1.076 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt solveSimpleEquations (simulation): time 0.002695/1.677, allocations: 0.601 MB / 1.493 GB, free: 60 kB / 1.076 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt tearingSystem (simulation): time 0.001553/1.678, allocations: 0.5769 MB / 1.494 GB, free: 15.46 MB / 1.092 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt inputDerivativesUsed (simulation): time 0.0003804/1.679, allocations: 135.9 kB / 1.494 GB, free: 15.33 MB / 1.092 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt calculateStrongComponentJacobians (simulation): time 0.01222/1.691, allocations: 14.4 MB / 1.508 GB, free: 15.97 MB / 1.107 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt calculateStateSetsJacobians (simulation): time 6.452e-06/1.691, allocations: 11.88 kB / 1.508 GB, free: 15.96 MB / 1.107 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt symbolicJacobian (simulation): time 0.0133/1.704, allocations: 7.145 MB / 1.515 GB, free: 8.727 MB / 1.107 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt removeConstants (simulation): time 0.00648/1.711, allocations: 1.699 MB / 1.517 GB, free: 7.004 MB / 1.107 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyTimeIndepFuncCalls (simulation): time 0.002687/1.713, allocations: 123.9 kB / 1.517 GB, free: 6.883 MB / 1.107 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyAllExpressions (simulation): time 0.006182/1.72, allocations: 0.6276 MB / 1.517 GB, free: 6.254 MB / 1.107 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt findZeroCrossings (simulation): time 0.0005512/1.72, allocations: 153.7 kB / 1.518 GB, free: 6.102 MB / 1.107 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt collapseArrayExpressions (simulation): time 0.00032/1.721, allocations: 83.95 kB / 1.518 GB, free: 6.02 MB / 1.107 GB Notification: Performance of sorting global known variables: time 0.01565/1.736, allocations: 7.347 MB / 1.525 GB, free: 14.68 MB / 1.123 GB Notification: Performance of sort global known variables: time 5.11e-07/1.736, allocations: 0 / 1.525 GB, free: 14.68 MB / 1.123 GB Notification: Performance of remove unused functions: time 0.0177/1.754, allocations: 3.964 MB / 1.529 GB, free: 10.72 MB / 1.123 GB Notification: Model statistics after passing the back-end for simulation: * Number of independent subsystems: 12 * Number of states: 43 (sla.vol[1].dynBal.U,sla.vol[2].dynBal.U,sla.vol[3].dynBal.U,sla.vol[4].dynBal.U,sla.vol[5].dynBal.U,sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_b[1].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[2].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[3].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[4].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[5].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T[3],TOut.T) * Number of discrete variables: 3 ($whenCondition1,pulse.T_start,pulse.count) * Number of discrete states: 1 (pulse.count) * Number of clocked states: 0 () * Top-level inputs: 0 Notification: Strong component statistics for simulation (210): * Single equations (assignments): 199 * Array equations: 0 * Algorithm blocks: 0 * Record equations: 2 * When equations: 2 * If-equations: 0 * Equation systems (not torn): 0 * Torn equation systems: 7 * Mixed (continuous/discrete) equation systems: 0 Notification: Torn system details for strict tearing set: * Linear torn systems (#iteration vars, #inner vars, density): 7 systems {(1,9,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,9,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%)} * Non-linear torn systems (#iteration vars, #inner vars): 0 systems Notification: Performance of Backend phase and start with SimCode phase: time 0.002221/1.756, allocations: 0.5993 MB / 1.529 GB, free: 10.15 MB / 1.123 GB Notification: Performance of simCode: created initialization part: time 0.0229/1.779, allocations: 13.45 MB / 1.542 GB, free: 12.53 MB / 1.139 GB Notification: Performance of simCode: created event and clocks part: time 1.325e-05/1.779, allocations: 0 / 1.542 GB, free: 12.53 MB / 1.139 GB Notification: Performance of simCode: created simulation system equations: time 0.005051/1.784, allocations: 3.048 MB / 1.545 GB, free: 9.391 MB / 1.139 GB Notification: Performance of simCode: created of all other equations (e.g. parameter, nominal, assert, etc): time 0.01667/1.801, allocations: 2.935 MB / 1.548 GB, free: 6.504 MB / 1.139 GB Notification: Performance of simCode: created linear, non-linear and system jacobian parts: time 0.03611/1.837, allocations: 18.99 MB / 1.567 GB, free: 3.453 MB / 1.154 GB Notification: Performance of simCode: some other stuff during SimCode phase: time 0.009645/1.847, allocations: 5.375 MB / 1.572 GB, free: 14.04 MB / 1.17 GB Notification: Performance of simCode: alias equations: time 0.01651/1.863, allocations: 6.426 MB / 1.578 GB, free: 7.629 MB / 1.17 GB Notification: Performance of simCode: all other stuff during SimCode phase: time 0.003306/1.867, allocations: 431.4 kB / 1.579 GB, free: 7.207 MB / 1.17 GB Notification: Performance of SimCode: time 1.222e-06/1.867, allocations: 0 / 1.579 GB, free: 7.207 MB / 1.17 GB Notification: Performance of Templates: time 0.2163/2.083, allocations: 137.7 MB / 1.713 GB, free: 14.8 MB / 1.311 GB make -j1 -f Buildings_9_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.makefile (rm -f Buildings_9_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.pipe ; mkfifo Buildings_9_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.pipe ; head -c 1048576 < Buildings_9_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.pipe >> ../files/Buildings_9_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.sim & ./Buildings_9_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU -abortSlowSimulation -alarm=480 -emit_protected -lv LOG_STATS > Buildings_9_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.pipe 2>&1) diffSimulationResults("Buildings_9_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU_res.mat","/mnt/ReferenceFiles/Buildings/csv/maint_9.1.x/Buildings_Fluid_HeatExchangers_RadiantSlabs_Examples_StepResponseEpsilonNTU.csv","/var/lib/jenkins/ws/OpenModelicaLibraryTestingWork/OpenModelicaLibraryTesting/files/Buildings_9_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.diff",relTol=0.003,relTolDiffMinMax=0.003,rangeDelta=0.001) Reference file matches