Running: ./testmodel.py --libraries=/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries --ompython_omhome=/usr Buildings_13_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.conf.json
loadFile("/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/ModelicaServices 4.1.0+maint.om/package.mo", uses=false) [Timeout 180]
"Notification: Performance of loadFile(/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/ModelicaServices 4.1.0+maint.om/package.mo): time 0.001231/0.001231, allocations: 80.88 kB / 20.82 MB, free: 3.629 MB / 18.57 MB
"
[Timeout remaining time 180]
loadFile("/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Complex 4.1.0+maint.om/package.mo", uses=false) [Timeout 180]
"Notification: Performance of loadFile(/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Complex 4.1.0+maint.om/package.mo): time 0.001497/0.001497, allocations: 165 kB / 24.25 MB, free: 208 kB / 18.57 MB
"
[Timeout remaining time 180]
loadFile("/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Modelica 4.1.0+maint.om/package.mo", uses=false) [Timeout 180]
"Notification: Performance of loadFile(/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Modelica 4.1.0+maint.om/package.mo): time 0.8969/0.8969, allocations: 177.2 MB / 204.7 MB, free: 5.453 MB / 186.7 MB
"
[Timeout remaining time 179]
loadFile("/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Buildings 13.0.2-maint.13.x/package.mo", uses=false) [Timeout 180]
"Notification: Performance of loadFile(/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Buildings 13.0.2-maint.13.x/package.mo): time 1.862/1.862, allocations: 389.6 MB / 0.6355 GB, free: 12.27 MB / 0.6042 GB
"
[Timeout remaining time 178]
Using package Buildings with version 13.0.2 (/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Buildings 13.0.2-maint.13.x/package.mo)
Using package Modelica with version 4.1.0 (/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Modelica 4.1.0+maint.om/package.mo)
Using package Complex with version 4.1.0 (/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Complex 4.1.0+maint.om/package.mo)
Using package ModelicaServices with version 4.1.0 (/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/ModelicaServices 4.1.0+maint.om/package.mo)
Running command: translateModel(Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU,tolerance=1e-06,outputFormat="empty",numberOfIntervals=2500,variableFilter="",fileNamePrefix="Buildings_13_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU")
translateModel(Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU,tolerance=1e-06,outputFormat="empty",numberOfIntervals=2500,variableFilter="",fileNamePrefix="Buildings_13_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU") [Timeout 300]
"Notification: Performance of FrontEnd - loaded program: time 1.453e-06/1.453e-06, allocations: 3.938 kB / 0.7754 GB, free: 5.227 MB / 0.7292 GB
Notification: Performance of FrontEnd - Absyn->SCode: time 1.404e-05/1.549e-05, allocations: 5.125 kB / 0.7754 GB, free: 5.223 MB / 0.7292 GB
Notification: Performance of NFInst.instantiate(Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU): time 0.01038/0.0104, allocations: 13.45 MB / 0.7885 GB, free: 7.777 MB / 0.7448 GB
Notification: Performance of NFInst.instExpressions: time 0.01061/0.02101, allocations: 9.645 MB / 0.7979 GB, free: 14.16 MB / 0.7605 GB
Notification: Performance of NFInst.updateImplicitVariability: time 0.0008802/0.02189, allocations: 83.31 kB / 0.798 GB, free: 14.07 MB / 0.7605 GB
[/var/lib/jenkins/ws/OpenModelicaLibraryTestingWork/OpenModelica/OMCompiler/Compiler/NFFrontEnd/NFCeval.mo:1059:9-1059:67:writable] Error: Internal error NFCeval.evalBinaryAdd failed to evaluate ‘i + 1‘
Notification: Performance of NFTyping.typeComponents: time 0.001607/0.0235, allocations: 0.9526 MB / 0.799 GB, free: 13.12 MB / 0.7605 GB
Notification: Performance of NFTyping.typeBindings: time 0.002439/0.02593, allocations: 1.908 MB / 0.8008 GB, free: 11.22 MB / 0.7605 GB
Notification: Performance of NFTyping.typeClassSections: time 0.002884/0.02882, allocations: 1.75 MB / 0.8025 GB, free: 9.477 MB / 0.7605 GB
Notification: Performance of NFFlatten.flatten: time 0.01182/0.04064, allocations: 19.71 MB / 0.8218 GB, free: 5.73 MB / 0.7761 GB
Notification: Performance of NFFlatten.resolveConnections: time 0.005363/0.046, allocations: 5.347 MB / 0.827 GB, free: 360 kB / 0.7761 GB
Notification: Performance of NFEvalConstants.evaluate: time 0.008002/0.05401, allocations: 7.86 MB / 0.8347 GB, free: 8.52 MB / 0.7917 GB
Notification: Performance of NFSimplifyModel.simplify: time 0.006218/0.06023, allocations: 5.72 MB / 0.8403 GB, free: 2.797 MB / 0.7917 GB
Notification: Performance of NFPackage.collectConstants: time 0.001023/0.06125, allocations: 0.7305 MB / 0.841 GB, free: 2.066 MB / 0.7917 GB
Notification: Performance of NFFlatten.collectFunctions: time 0.00347/0.06472, allocations: 2.409 MB / 0.8433 GB, free: 15.67 MB / 0.8073 GB
Notification: Performance of NFScalarize.scalarize: time 0.002145/0.06686, allocations: 3.279 MB / 0.8465 GB, free: 12.39 MB / 0.8073 GB
Notification: Performance of NFVerifyModel.verify: time 0.003088/0.06995, allocations: 3.181 MB / 0.8496 GB, free: 9.199 MB / 0.8073 GB
Notification: Performance of NFConvertDAE.convert: time 0.008673/0.07862, allocations: 9.743 MB / 0.8592 GB, free: 15.43 MB / 0.823 GB
Notification: Performance of FrontEnd - DAE generated: time 7.464e-06/0.07863, allocations: 0 / 0.8592 GB, free: 15.43 MB / 0.823 GB
Notification: Performance of FrontEnd: time 9.62e-07/0.07863, allocations: 0 / 0.8592 GB, free: 15.43 MB / 0.823 GB
Notification: Performance of Transformations before backend: time 0.0001771/0.07881, allocations: 0.5 kB / 0.8592 GB, free: 15.43 MB / 0.823 GB
Notification: Model statistics after passing the front-end and creating the data structures used by the back-end:
 * Number of equations: 866
 * Number of variables: 866
Notification: Performance of Generate backend data structure: time 0.01053/0.08933, allocations: 8.905 MB / 0.8678 GB, free: 6.449 MB / 0.823 GB
Notification: Performance of prepare preOptimizeDAE: time 3.548e-05/0.08937, allocations: 12.75 kB / 0.8679 GB, free: 6.438 MB / 0.823 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt normalInlineFunction (simulation): time 0.001422/0.09079, allocations: 0.901 MB / 0.8687 GB, free: 5.535 MB / 0.823 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt evaluateParameters (simulation): time 0.007162/0.09795, allocations: 5.931 MB / 0.8745 GB, free: 15.48 MB / 0.8386 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt simplifyIfEquations (simulation): time 0.000148/0.0981, allocations: 334.7 kB / 0.8749 GB, free: 15.16 MB / 0.8386 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt expandDerOperator (simulation): time 0.0004476/0.09855, allocations: 487.8 kB / 0.8753 GB, free: 14.68 MB / 0.8386 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt clockPartitioning (simulation): time 0.003298/0.1018, allocations: 3.379 MB / 0.8786 GB, free: 10.98 MB / 0.8386 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt findStateOrder (simulation): time 5.115e-05/0.1019, allocations: 15.88 kB / 0.8786 GB, free: 10.96 MB / 0.8386 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt replaceEdgeChange (simulation): time 0.0002224/0.1021, allocations: 140 kB / 0.8788 GB, free: 10.82 MB / 0.8386 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt inlineArrayEqn (simulation): time 6.602e-05/0.1022, allocations: 103.9 kB / 0.8789 GB, free: 10.72 MB / 0.8386 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt removeEqualRHS (simulation): time 0.001465/0.1037, allocations: 1.273 MB / 0.8801 GB, free: 9.426 MB / 0.8386 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt removeSimpleEquations (simulation): time 0.01425/0.1179, allocations: 14.39 MB / 0.8942 GB, free: 10.68 MB / 0.8542 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt comSubExp (simulation): time 0.00352/0.1214, allocations: 2.708 MB / 0.8968 GB, free: 7.945 MB / 0.8542 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt resolveLoops (simulation): time 0.0008651/0.1223, allocations: 0.7711 MB / 0.8976 GB, free: 7.172 MB / 0.8542 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt evalFunc (simulation): time 0.007219/0.1295, allocations: 4.824 MB / 0.9023 GB, free: 2.324 MB / 0.8542 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt encapsulateWhenConditions (simulation): time 0.0009404/0.1304, allocations: 1.221 MB / 0.9035 GB, free: 0.9922 MB / 0.8542 GB
Notification: Performance of pre-optimization done (n=219): time 3.286e-06/0.1305, allocations: 0 / 0.9035 GB, free: 0.9922 MB / 0.8542 GB
Notification: Performance of matching and sorting (n=227): time 0.005463/0.1359, allocations: 3.482 MB / 0.9069 GB, free: 13.49 MB / 0.8698 GB
Notification: Performance of inlineWhenForInitialization (initialization): time 5.454e-05/0.136, allocations: 132.8 kB / 0.907 GB, free: 13.33 MB / 0.8698 GB
Notification: Performance of selectInitializationVariablesDAE (initialization): time 0.0056/0.1416, allocations: 6.735 MB / 0.9136 GB, free: 6.59 MB / 0.8698 GB
Notification: Performance of collectPreVariables (initialization): time 0.0002032/0.1418, allocations: 121.7 kB / 0.9137 GB, free: 6.465 MB / 0.8698 GB
Notification: Performance of collectInitialEqns (initialization): time 0.001397/0.1432, allocations: 2.003 MB / 0.9156 GB, free: 4.438 MB / 0.8698 GB
Notification: Performance of collectInitialBindings (initialization): time 0.0005563/0.1437, allocations: 0.887 MB / 0.9165 GB, free: 3.543 MB / 0.8698 GB
Notification: Performance of simplifyInitialFunctions (initialization): time 0.0008875/0.1446, allocations: 1.037 MB / 0.9175 GB, free: 2.496 MB / 0.8698 GB
Notification: Performance of setup shared object (initialization): time 6.635e-05/0.1447, allocations: 305.1 kB / 0.9178 GB, free: 2.195 MB / 0.8698 GB
Notification: Performance of preBalanceInitialSystem (initialization): time 0.0009447/0.1456, allocations: 0.7984 MB / 0.9186 GB, free: 1.375 MB / 0.8698 GB
Notification: Performance of partitionIndependentBlocks (initialization): time 0.00197/0.1476, allocations: 3.053 MB / 0.9216 GB, free: 13.08 MB / 0.8855 GB
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3]))
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3]))
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3]))
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]))
Notification: Performance of analyzeInitialSystem (initialization): time 0.008684/0.1563, allocations: 8.583 MB / 0.9299 GB, free: 3.176 MB / 0.8855 GB
Notification: Performance of solveInitialSystemEqSystem (initialization): time 2.74e-05/0.1563, allocations: 24 kB / 0.93 GB, free: 3.152 MB / 0.8855 GB
Notification: Performance of matching and sorting (n=654) (initialization): time 0.004391/0.1607, allocations: 3.442 MB / 0.9333 GB, free: 15.63 MB / 0.9011 GB
Notification: Performance of prepare postOptimizeDAE: time 5.729e-05/0.1608, allocations: 69.7 kB / 0.9334 GB, free: 15.56 MB / 0.9011 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyComplexFunction (initialization): time 5.082e-05/0.1608, allocations: 88.06 kB / 0.9335 GB, free: 15.47 MB / 0.9011 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt tearingSystem (initialization): time 0.0008265/0.1616, allocations: 437.5 kB / 0.9339 GB, free: 15.02 MB / 0.9011 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt solveSimpleEquations (initialization): time 0.002613/0.1642, allocations: 1.509 MB / 0.9354 GB, free: 13.5 MB / 0.9011 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt calculateStrongComponentJacobians (initialization): time 0.005424/0.1697, allocations: 9.892 MB / 0.945 GB, free: 2.938 MB / 0.9011 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyAllExpressions (initialization): time 0.003993/0.1737, allocations: 203.9 kB / 0.9452 GB, free: 2.738 MB / 0.9011 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt collapseArrayExpressions (initialization): time 0.0003535/0.174, allocations: 231.9 kB / 0.9454 GB, free: 2.512 MB / 0.9011 GB
Warning: The initial conditions are over specified. The following 8 initial equations are redundant, so they are removed from the initialization system:
         sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start
         sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start
         sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start
         sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start
         sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3])
         sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3])
         sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3])
         sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]).
Notification: Performance of preBalanceInitialSystem (initialization_lambda0): time 0.003047/0.1771, allocations: 1.156 MB / 0.9466 GB, free: 1.332 MB / 0.9011 GB
Notification: Performance of partitionIndependentBlocks (initialization_lambda0): time 0.002261/0.1793, allocations: 3.053 MB / 0.9496 GB, free: 13.04 MB / 0.9167 GB
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3]))
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3]))
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3]))
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]))
Notification: Performance of analyzeInitialSystem (initialization_lambda0): time 0.01167/0.191, allocations: 8.392 MB / 0.9578 GB, free: 3.324 MB / 0.9167 GB
Notification: Performance of solveInitialSystemEqSystem (initialization_lambda0): time 4.141e-05/0.191, allocations: 24 kB / 0.9578 GB, free: 3.301 MB / 0.9167 GB
Notification: Performance of matching and sorting (n=654) (initialization_lambda0): time 0.005946/0.197, allocations: 3.442 MB / 0.9611 GB, free: 15.78 MB / 0.9323 GB
Notification: Performance of prepare postOptimizeDAE: time 6.021e-05/0.197, allocations: 69.7 kB / 0.9612 GB, free: 15.7 MB / 0.9323 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyComplexFunction (initialization): time 7.03e-05/0.1971, allocations: 84 kB / 0.9613 GB, free: 15.62 MB / 0.9323 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt tearingSystem (initialization): time 0.001044/0.1982, allocations: 449.7 kB / 0.9617 GB, free: 15.15 MB / 0.9323 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt solveSimpleEquations (initialization): time 0.003703/0.2019, allocations: 1.505 MB / 0.9632 GB, free: 13.64 MB / 0.9323 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt calculateStrongComponentJacobians (initialization): time 0.009116/0.211, allocations: 9.886 MB / 0.9728 GB, free: 3.09 MB / 0.9323 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyAllExpressions (initialization): time 0.007166/0.2181, allocations: 207.8 kB / 0.973 GB, free: 2.887 MB / 0.9323 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt collapseArrayExpressions (initialization): time 0.003374/0.2215, allocations: 228 kB / 0.9733 GB, free: 2.664 MB / 0.9323 GB
Warning: The initial conditions are over specified. The following 8 initial equations are redundant, so they are removed from the initialization_lambda0 system:
         sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start
         sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start
         sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start
         sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start
         sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3])
         sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3])
         sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3])
         sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]).
Notification: Model statistics after passing the back-end for initialization:
 * Number of independent subsystems: 384
 * Number of states: 0 ()
 * Number of discrete variables: 5 ($PRE.pulse.count,$PRE.pulse.T_start,pulse.count,pulse.T_start,$whenCondition1)
 * Number of discrete states: 0 ()
 * Number of clocked states: 0 ()
 * Top-level inputs: 0
Notification: Strong component statistics for initialization (630):
 * Single equations (assignments): 622
 * Array equations: 0
 * Algorithm blocks: 1
 * Record equations: 0
 * When equations: 0
 * If-equations: 0
 * Equation systems (not torn): 0
 * Torn equation systems: 7
 * Mixed (continuous/discrete) equation systems: 0
Notification: Torn system details for strict tearing set:
 * Linear torn systems (#iteration vars, #inner vars, density): 7 systems
   {(1,9,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,9,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%)}
 * Non-linear torn systems (#iteration vars, #inner vars): 0 systems
Notification: Performance of prepare postOptimizeDAE: time 0.001006/0.2225, allocations: 0.7563 MB / 0.974 GB, free: 1.906 MB / 0.9323 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt lateInlineFunction (simulation): time 0.0008233/0.2233, allocations: 435.5 kB / 0.9744 GB, free: 1.48 MB / 0.9323 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt wrapFunctionCalls (simulation): time 0.006219/0.2296, allocations: 1.902 MB / 0.9763 GB, free: 15.54 MB / 0.948 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt inlineArrayEqn (simulation): time 2.344e-05/0.2296, allocations: 27.94 kB / 0.9763 GB, free: 15.51 MB / 0.948 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt constantLinearSystem (simulation): time 9.097e-06/0.2296, allocations: 8 kB / 0.9763 GB, free: 15.5 MB / 0.948 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifysemiLinear (simulation): time 0.001427/0.231, allocations: 0.8667 MB / 0.9771 GB, free: 14.59 MB / 0.948 GB
Warning: The model contains alias variables with redundant start and/or conflicting nominal values. It is recommended to resolve the conflicts, because otherwise the system could be hard to solve. To print the conflicting alias sets and the chosen candidates please use -d=aliasConflicts.
Notification: Performance of postOpt removeSimpleEquations (simulation): time 0.008896/0.2399, allocations: 5.292 MB / 0.9823 GB, free: 9.195 MB / 0.948 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyComplexFunction (simulation): time 8.315e-06/0.2399, allocations: 4.344 kB / 0.9823 GB, free: 9.191 MB / 0.948 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt solveSimpleEquations (simulation): time 0.002182/0.2421, allocations: 0.7604 MB / 0.9831 GB, free: 8.43 MB / 0.948 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt tearingSystem (simulation): time 0.0009011/0.243, allocations: 325.5 kB / 0.9834 GB, free: 8.082 MB / 0.948 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt inputDerivativesUsed (simulation): time 0.0002206/0.2432, allocations: 123.9 kB / 0.9835 GB, free: 7.961 MB / 0.948 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt calculateStrongComponentJacobians (simulation): time 0.005918/0.2491, allocations: 10.69 MB / 0.9939 GB, free: 12.6 MB / 0.9636 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt calculateStateSetsJacobians (simulation): time 2.836e-06/0.2491, allocations: 7.938 kB / 0.9939 GB, free: 12.59 MB / 0.9636 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt symbolicJacobian (simulation): time 0.002782/0.2519, allocations: 2.207 MB / 0.9961 GB, free: 10.27 MB / 0.9636 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt removeConstants (simulation): time 0.001498/0.2534, allocations: 0.9565 MB / 0.997 GB, free: 9.316 MB / 0.9636 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyTimeIndepFuncCalls (simulation): time 0.0005334/0.254, allocations: 107.9 kB / 0.9971 GB, free: 9.211 MB / 0.9636 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyAllExpressions (simulation): time 0.00137/0.2553, allocations: 83.88 kB / 0.9972 GB, free: 9.129 MB / 0.9636 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt findZeroCrossings (simulation): time 0.0002604/0.2556, allocations: 161.6 kB / 0.9974 GB, free: 8.969 MB / 0.9636 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt collapseArrayExpressions (simulation): time 0.0001141/0.2557, allocations: 59.95 kB / 0.9974 GB, free: 8.91 MB / 0.9636 GB
Notification: Performance of sorting global known variables: time 0.00261/0.2583, allocations: 2.641 MB / 1 GB, free: 6.273 MB / 0.9636 GB
Notification: Performance of sort global known variables: time 7e-08/0.2583, allocations: 4 kB / 1 GB, free: 6.27 MB / 0.9636 GB
Notification: Performance of remove unused functions: time 0.006962/0.2653, allocations: 3.941 MB / 1.004 GB, free: 2.328 MB / 0.9636 GB
Notification: Model statistics after passing the back-end for simulation:
 * Number of independent subsystems: 12
 * Number of states: 43 (sla.vol[1].dynBal.U,sla.vol[2].dynBal.U,sla.vol[3].dynBal.U,sla.vol[4].dynBal.U,sla.vol[5].dynBal.U,sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_b[1].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[2].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[3].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[4].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[5].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T[3],TOut.T)
 * Number of discrete variables: 3 ($whenCondition1,pulse.T_start,pulse.count)
 * Number of discrete states: 1 (pulse.count)
 * Number of clocked states: 0 ()
 * Top-level inputs: 0
Notification: Strong component statistics for simulation (205):
 * Single equations (assignments): 194
 * Array equations: 0
 * Algorithm blocks: 0
 * Record equations: 2
 * When equations: 2
 * If-equations: 0
 * Equation systems (not torn): 0
 * Torn equation systems: 7
 * Mixed (continuous/discrete) equation systems: 0
Notification: Torn system details for strict tearing set:
 * Linear torn systems (#iteration vars, #inner vars, density): 7 systems
   {(1,9,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,9,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%)}
 * Non-linear torn systems (#iteration vars, #inner vars): 0 systems
Notification: Performance of Backend phase and start with SimCode phase: time 0.0009381/0.2662, allocations: 0.5212 MB / 1.004 GB, free: 1.801 MB / 0.9636 GB
Notification: Performance of simCode: created initialization part: time 0.006061/0.2723, allocations: 5.8 MB / 1.01 GB, free: 11.79 MB / 0.9792 GB
Notification: Performance of simCode: created event and clocks part: time 5.948e-05/0.2723, allocations: 73.81 kB / 1.01 GB, free: 11.72 MB / 0.9792 GB
Notification: Performance of simCode: created simulation system equations: time 0.001661/0.274, allocations: 1.561 MB / 1.012 GB, free: 10.07 MB / 0.9792 GB
Notification: Performance of simCode: created of all other equations (e.g. parameter, nominal, assert, etc): time 0.008494/0.2825, allocations: 2.87 MB / 1.014 GB, free: 7.238 MB / 0.9792 GB
Notification: Performance of simCode: created linear, non-linear and system jacobian parts: time 0.01679/0.2993, allocations: 12.11 MB / 1.026 GB, free: 10.98 MB / 0.9948 GB
Notification: Performance of simCode: some other stuff during SimCode phase: time 0.001987/0.3013, allocations: 1.608 MB / 1.028 GB, free: 9.344 MB / 0.9948 GB
Notification: Performance of simCode: alias equations: time 0.003939/0.3052, allocations: 1.044 MB / 1.029 GB, free: 8.312 MB / 0.9948 GB
Notification: Performance of simCode: all other stuff during SimCode phase: time 0.004671/0.3099, allocations: 1.756 MB / 1.031 GB, free: 6.527 MB / 0.9948 GB
Notification: Performance of SimCode: time 2.053e-06/0.3099, allocations: 4 kB / 1.031 GB, free: 6.523 MB / 0.9948 GB
Notification: Performance of Templates: time 0.445/0.7549, allocations: 148.6 MB / 1.176 GB, free: 147.4 MB / 1.01 GB
"
[Timeout remaining time 299]
make -j1 -f Buildings_13_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.makefile [Timeout 300]
(rm -f Buildings_13_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.pipe ; mkfifo Buildings_13_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.pipe ; head -c 1048576 < Buildings_13_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.pipe >> ../files/Buildings_13_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.sim & ./Buildings_13_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU -abortSlowSimulation -alarm=240  -lv LOG_STATS > Buildings_13_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.pipe 2>&1) [Timeout 240]
[Calling sys.exit(0), Time elapsed: 7.903028463944793]