Running: ./testmodel.py --libraries=/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries --ompython_omhome=/usr Buildings_latest_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference.conf.json loadFile("/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/ModelicaServices 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo", uses=false) loadFile("/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Complex 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo", uses=false) loadFile("/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Modelica 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo", uses=false) loadFile("/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Buildings 11.1.0-master/package.mo", uses=false) Using package Buildings with version 11.1.0 (/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Buildings 11.1.0-master/package.mo) Using package Modelica with version 4.0.0 (/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Modelica 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo) Using package Complex with version 4.0.0 (/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Complex 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo) Using package ModelicaServices with version 4.0.0 (/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/ModelicaServices 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo) Running command: "" <> buildModelFMU(Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference,fileNamePrefix="Buildings_latest_Buildings_Fluid_HeatExchangers_RadiantSlabs_Examples_StepResponseFiniteDifference",fmuType="me",version="2.0",platforms={"static"}) "" <> buildModelFMU(Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference,fileNamePrefix="Buildings_latest_Buildings_Fluid_HeatExchangers_RadiantSlabs_Examples_StepResponseFiniteDifference",fmuType="me",version="2.0",platforms={"static"}) Notification: Performance of loadFile(/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/ModelicaServices 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo): time 0.007617/0.007617, allocations: 97.62 kB / 15.73 MB, free: 6.047 MB / 14.72 MB Notification: Performance of loadFile(/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Complex 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo): time 0.001622/0.001622, allocations: 198.5 kB / 16.68 MB, free: 5.969 MB / 14.72 MB Notification: Performance of loadFile(/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Modelica 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo): time 1.308/1.308, allocations: 222.9 MB / 240.4 MB, free: 4.336 MB / 190.1 MB Notification: Performance of loadFile(/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Buildings 11.1.0-master/package.mo): time 2.62/2.62, allocations: 469.4 MB / 0.7421 GB, free: 7.574 MB / 0.5919 GB Notification: Performance of FrontEnd - loaded program: time 0.001159/0.001159, allocations: 63.91 kB / 1.064 GB, free: 13.85 MB / 0.8262 GB Notification: Performance of FrontEnd - Absyn->SCode: time 0.3188/0.3199, allocations: 159.1 MB / 1.22 GB, free: 14.61 MB / 0.9825 GB Notification: Performance of NFInst.instantiate(Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference): time 0.6815/1.001, allocations: 31.76 MB / 1.251 GB, free: 4.316 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of NFInst.instExpressions: time 0.01672/1.018, allocations: 12.3 MB / 1.263 GB, free: 4.109 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of NFInst.updateImplicitVariability: time 0.002401/1.021, allocations: 61.91 kB / 1.263 GB, free: 4.109 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of NFTyping.typeComponents: time 0.003283/1.024, allocations: 1.121 MB / 1.264 GB, free: 3.973 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of NFTyping.typeBindings: time 0.006199/1.03, allocations: 2.154 MB / 1.266 GB, free: 3.441 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of NFTyping.typeClassSections: time 0.005861/1.036, allocations: 1.872 MB / 1.268 GB, free: 3.219 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of NFFlatten.flatten: time 0.02331/1.059, allocations: 19.58 MB / 1.287 GB, free: 14.36 MB / 1.014 GB Notification: Performance of NFFlatten.resolveConnections: time 0.01139/1.071, allocations: 7.196 MB / 1.294 GB, free: 11.74 MB / 1.014 GB Notification: Performance of NFEvalConstants.evaluate: time 0.01434/1.085, allocations: 6.538 MB / 1.3 GB, free: 9.48 MB / 1.014 GB Notification: Performance of NFSimplifyModel.simplify: time 0.01177/1.097, allocations: 5.352 MB / 1.306 GB, free: 7.477 MB / 1.014 GB Notification: Performance of NFPackage.collectConstants: time 0.003752/1.101, allocations: 0.7497 MB / 1.306 GB, free: 7.477 MB / 1.014 GB Notification: Performance of NFFlatten.collectFunctions: time 0.01213/1.113, allocations: 3.214 MB / 1.31 GB, free: 6.801 MB / 1.014 GB Notification: Performance of NFScalarize.scalarize: time 0.007535/1.121, allocations: 3.003 MB / 1.312 GB, free: 5.492 MB / 1.014 GB Notification: Performance of NFVerifyModel.verify: time 0.01417/1.135, allocations: 4.744 MB / 1.317 GB, free: 2.57 MB / 1.014 GB Notification: Performance of NFConvertDAE.convert: time 0.02727/1.162, allocations: 15.49 MB / 1.332 GB, free: 10.08 MB / 1.029 GB Notification: Performance of FrontEnd - DAE generated: time 7.173e-06/1.162, allocations: 0 / 1.332 GB, free: 10.08 MB / 1.029 GB Notification: Performance of FrontEnd: time 2.154e-06/1.162, allocations: 0.9688 kB / 1.332 GB, free: 10.08 MB / 1.029 GB Notification: Performance of Transformations before backend: time 0.000581/1.163, allocations: 0 / 1.332 GB, free: 10.08 MB / 1.029 GB Notification: Model statistics after passing the front-end and creating the data structures used by the back-end: * Number of equations: 866 * Number of variables: 866 Notification: Performance of Generate backend data structure: time 0.04255/1.205, allocations: 11.76 MB / 1.344 GB, free: 2.727 MB / 1.029 GB Notification: Performance of prepare preOptimizeDAE: time 5.988e-05/1.205, allocations: 8.969 kB / 1.344 GB, free: 2.727 MB / 1.029 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt introduceOutputAliases (simulation): time 0.002448/1.208, allocations: 0.4884 MB / 1.344 GB, free: 2.375 MB / 1.029 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt normalInlineFunction (simulation): time 0.005757/1.214, allocations: 0.9247 MB / 1.345 GB, free: 1.887 MB / 1.029 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt evaluateParameters (simulation): time 0.02724/1.241, allocations: 9.679 MB / 1.355 GB, free: 10.08 MB / 1.045 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt simplifyIfEquations (simulation): time 0.0004116/1.241, allocations: 330.8 kB / 1.355 GB, free: 9.758 MB / 1.045 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt expandDerOperator (simulation): time 0.00272/1.244, allocations: 486.5 kB / 1.355 GB, free: 9.285 MB / 1.045 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt clockPartitioning (simulation): time 0.01626/1.26, allocations: 5.952 MB / 1.361 GB, free: 3.098 MB / 1.045 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt findStateOrder (simulation): time 0.0001774/1.261, allocations: 15.88 kB / 1.361 GB, free: 3.082 MB / 1.045 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt replaceEdgeChange (simulation): time 0.00153/1.262, allocations: 146.7 kB / 1.361 GB, free: 2.941 MB / 1.045 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt inlineArrayEqn (simulation): time 0.0001287/1.262, allocations: 95.98 kB / 1.361 GB, free: 2.848 MB / 1.045 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt removeEqualRHS (simulation): time 0.01052/1.273, allocations: 4.766 MB / 1.366 GB, free: 14.07 MB / 1.061 GB Warning: The model contains alias variables with redundant start and/or conflicting nominal values. It is recommended to resolve the conflicts, because otherwise the system could be hard to solve. To print the conflicting alias sets and the chosen candidates please use -d=aliasConflicts. Notification: Performance of preOpt removeSimpleEquations (simulation): time 0.06909/1.342, allocations: 33.8 MB / 1.399 GB, free: 10.77 MB / 1.092 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt comSubExp (simulation): time 0.01273/1.355, allocations: 6.224 MB / 1.405 GB, free: 4.496 MB / 1.092 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt resolveLoops (simulation): time 0.004425/1.359, allocations: 2.552 MB / 1.408 GB, free: 1.953 MB / 1.092 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt evalFunc (simulation): time 0.0307/1.39, allocations: 13.24 MB / 1.421 GB, free: 4.227 MB / 1.107 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt encapsulateWhenConditions (simulation): time 0.004268/1.394, allocations: 2.145 MB / 1.423 GB, free: 2.062 MB / 1.107 GB Notification: Performance of pre-optimization done (n=224): time 6.071e-06/1.394, allocations: 0 / 1.423 GB, free: 2.062 MB / 1.107 GB Notification: Performance of matching and sorting (n=232): time 0.03521/1.429, allocations: 14.28 MB / 1.437 GB, free: 3.621 MB / 1.123 GB Notification: Performance of inlineWhenForInitialization (initialization): time 7.991e-05/1.429, allocations: 136.8 kB / 1.437 GB, free: 3.461 MB / 1.123 GB Notification: Performance of selectInitializationVariablesDAE (initialization): time 0.02264/1.452, allocations: 10.43 MB / 1.447 GB, free: 9.035 MB / 1.139 GB Notification: Performance of collectPreVariables (initialization): time 0.001222/1.453, allocations: 113.7 kB / 1.447 GB, free: 8.918 MB / 1.139 GB Notification: Performance of collectInitialEqns (initialization): time 0.005655/1.459, allocations: 3.338 MB / 1.45 GB, free: 5.59 MB / 1.139 GB Notification: Performance of collectInitialBindings (initialization): time 0.00217/1.461, allocations: 0.9182 MB / 1.451 GB, free: 4.684 MB / 1.139 GB Notification: Performance of simplifyInitialFunctions (initialization): time 0.004046/1.465, allocations: 1.214 MB / 1.452 GB, free: 3.461 MB / 1.139 GB Notification: Performance of setup shared object (initialization): time 9.73e-05/1.465, allocations: 309 kB / 1.453 GB, free: 3.156 MB / 1.139 GB Notification: Performance of preBalanceInitialSystem (initialization): time 0.005887/1.471, allocations: 3.448 MB / 1.456 GB, free: 15.69 MB / 1.154 GB Notification: Performance of partitionIndependentBlocks (initialization): time 0.00772/1.479, allocations: 5.936 MB / 1.462 GB, free: 8.551 MB / 1.154 GB Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3])) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3])) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3])) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3])) Notification: Performance of analyzeInitialSystem (initialization): time 0.06084/1.54, allocations: 36.65 MB / 1.498 GB, free: 2.445 MB / 1.186 GB Notification: Performance of solveInitialSystemEqSystem (initialization): time 6.349e-05/1.54, allocations: 24 kB / 1.498 GB, free: 2.422 MB / 1.186 GB Notification: Performance of matching and sorting (n=659) (initialization): time 0.01998/1.56, allocations: 10.11 MB / 1.507 GB, free: 8.234 MB / 1.201 GB Notification: Performance of prepare postOptimizeDAE: time 0.000134/1.56, allocations: 73.69 kB / 1.508 GB, free: 8.156 MB / 1.201 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyComplexFunction (initialization): time 0.0001379/1.56, allocations: 84 kB / 1.508 GB, free: 8.074 MB / 1.201 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt tearingSystem (initialization): time 0.001929/1.562, allocations: 0.7085 MB / 1.508 GB, free: 7.344 MB / 1.201 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt solveSimpleEquations (initialization): time 0.005689/1.568, allocations: 1.478 MB / 1.51 GB, free: 5.863 MB / 1.201 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt calculateStrongComponentJacobians (initialization): time 0.01173/1.58, allocations: 14.53 MB / 1.524 GB, free: 6.367 MB / 1.217 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyAllExpressions (initialization): time 0.009941/1.59, allocations: 1.182 MB / 1.525 GB, free: 5.184 MB / 1.217 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt collapseArrayExpressions (initialization): time 0.001289/1.591, allocations: 280 kB / 1.525 GB, free: 4.91 MB / 1.217 GB Warning: The initial conditions are over specified. The following 8 initial equations are redundant, so they are removed from the initialization system: sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3]) sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3]) sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3]) sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]). Notification: Performance of preBalanceInitialSystem (initialization_lambda0): time 0.0135/1.604, allocations: 7.079 MB / 1.532 GB, free: 13.82 MB / 1.232 GB Notification: Performance of partitionIndependentBlocks (initialization_lambda0): time 0.007977/1.612, allocations: 5.924 MB / 1.538 GB, free: 6.688 MB / 1.232 GB Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3])) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3])) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3])) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3])) Notification: Performance of analyzeInitialSystem (initialization_lambda0): time 0.05938/1.672, allocations: 36.57 MB / 1.574 GB, free: 0.6641 MB / 1.264 GB Notification: Performance of solveInitialSystemEqSystem (initialization_lambda0): time 7.529e-05/1.672, allocations: 31.94 kB / 1.574 GB, free: 0.6328 MB / 1.264 GB Notification: Performance of matching and sorting (n=659) (initialization_lambda0): time 0.02/1.692, allocations: 10.11 MB / 1.584 GB, free: 6.445 MB / 1.279 GB Notification: Performance of prepare postOptimizeDAE: time 9.673e-05/1.692, allocations: 71.89 kB / 1.584 GB, free: 6.371 MB / 1.279 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyComplexFunction (initialization): time 0.0001107/1.692, allocations: 84.38 kB / 1.584 GB, free: 6.289 MB / 1.279 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt tearingSystem (initialization): time 0.001685/1.694, allocations: 0.7204 MB / 1.585 GB, free: 5.547 MB / 1.279 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt solveSimpleEquations (initialization): time 0.00535/1.699, allocations: 1.478 MB / 1.586 GB, free: 4.066 MB / 1.279 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt calculateStrongComponentJacobians (initialization): time 0.01165/1.711, allocations: 14.51 MB / 1.6 GB, free: 4.59 MB / 1.295 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyAllExpressions (initialization): time 0.01011/1.721, allocations: 1.181 MB / 1.601 GB, free: 3.406 MB / 1.295 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt collapseArrayExpressions (initialization): time 0.001341/1.722, allocations: 280 kB / 1.602 GB, free: 3.133 MB / 1.295 GB Warning: The initial conditions are over specified. The following 8 initial equations are redundant, so they are removed from the initialization_lambda0 system: sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3]) sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3]) sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3]) sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]). Notification: Model statistics after passing the back-end for initialization: * Number of independent subsystems: 384 * Number of states: 0 () * Number of discrete variables: 5 ($PRE.pulse.count,$PRE.pulse.T_start,pulse.count,pulse.T_start,$whenCondition1) * Number of discrete states: 0 () * Number of clocked states: 0 () * Top-level inputs: 0 Notification: Strong component statistics for initialization (635): * Single equations (assignments): 627 * Array equations: 0 * Algorithm blocks: 1 * Record equations: 0 * When equations: 0 * If-equations: 0 * Equation systems (not torn): 0 * Torn equation systems: 7 * Mixed (continuous/discrete) equation systems: 0 Notification: Torn system details for strict tearing set: * Linear torn systems (#iteration vars, #inner vars, density): 7 systems {(1,9,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,9,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%)} * Non-linear torn systems (#iteration vars, #inner vars): 0 systems Notification: Performance of prepare postOptimizeDAE: time 0.002316/1.725, allocations: 0.7589 MB / 1.602 GB, free: 2.367 MB / 1.295 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt lateInlineFunction (simulation): time 0.002727/1.728, allocations: 0.7024 MB / 1.603 GB, free: 1.66 MB / 1.295 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt wrapFunctionCalls (simulation): time 0.0106/1.738, allocations: 5.151 MB / 1.608 GB, free: 12.48 MB / 1.311 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt inlineArrayEqn (simulation): time 2.379e-05/1.738, allocations: 23.94 kB / 1.608 GB, free: 12.45 MB / 1.311 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt constantLinearSystem (simulation): time 1.775e-05/1.738, allocations: 7.984 kB / 1.608 GB, free: 12.45 MB / 1.311 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifysemiLinear (simulation): time 0.005873/1.744, allocations: 3.958 MB / 1.612 GB, free: 8.445 MB / 1.311 GB Warning: The model contains alias variables with redundant start and/or conflicting nominal values. It is recommended to resolve the conflicts, because otherwise the system could be hard to solve. To print the conflicting alias sets and the chosen candidates please use -d=aliasConflicts. Notification: Performance of postOpt removeSimpleEquations (simulation): time 0.02875/1.773, allocations: 13.41 MB / 1.625 GB, free: 10.86 MB / 1.326 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyComplexFunction (simulation): time 1.199e-05/1.773, allocations: 4 kB / 1.625 GB, free: 10.86 MB / 1.326 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt solveSimpleEquations (simulation): time 0.002563/1.775, allocations: 0.5972 MB / 1.626 GB, free: 10.26 MB / 1.326 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt tearingSystem (simulation): time 0.001484/1.777, allocations: 0.5872 MB / 1.626 GB, free: 9.652 MB / 1.326 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt inputDerivativesUsed (simulation): time 0.0003929/1.777, allocations: 143.8 kB / 1.626 GB, free: 9.512 MB / 1.326 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt calculateStrongComponentJacobians (simulation): time 0.01137/1.789, allocations: 14.39 MB / 1.64 GB, free: 10.14 MB / 1.342 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt calculateStateSetsJacobians (simulation): time 8.786e-06/1.789, allocations: 7.984 kB / 1.64 GB, free: 10.14 MB / 1.342 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt symbolicJacobian (simulation): time 0.01236/1.801, allocations: 7.152 MB / 1.647 GB, free: 2.895 MB / 1.342 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt removeConstants (simulation): time 0.005582/1.807, allocations: 1.699 MB / 1.649 GB, free: 1.172 MB / 1.342 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyTimeIndepFuncCalls (simulation): time 0.002423/1.809, allocations: 127.9 kB / 1.649 GB, free: 1.047 MB / 1.342 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyAllExpressions (simulation): time 0.005807/1.815, allocations: 0.6201 MB / 1.65 GB, free: 436 kB / 1.342 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt findZeroCrossings (simulation): time 0.0004762/1.815, allocations: 161.6 kB / 1.65 GB, free: 272 kB / 1.342 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt collapseArrayExpressions (simulation): time 0.0002883/1.816, allocations: 83.95 kB / 1.65 GB, free: 188 kB / 1.342 GB Notification: Performance of sorting global known variables: time 0.01538/1.831, allocations: 7.339 MB / 1.657 GB, free: 8.855 MB / 1.357 GB Notification: Performance of sort global known variables: time 4.91e-07/1.831, allocations: 0 / 1.657 GB, free: 8.855 MB / 1.357 GB Notification: Performance of remove unused functions: time 0.01987/1.851, allocations: 3.968 MB / 1.661 GB, free: 4.887 MB / 1.357 GB Notification: Model statistics after passing the back-end for simulation: * Number of independent subsystems: 12 * Number of states: 43 (sla.vol[1].dynBal.U,sla.vol[2].dynBal.U,sla.vol[3].dynBal.U,sla.vol[4].dynBal.U,sla.vol[5].dynBal.U,sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_b[1].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[2].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[3].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[4].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[5].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T[3],TOut.T) * Number of discrete variables: 3 ($whenCondition1,pulse.T_start,pulse.count) * Number of discrete states: 1 (pulse.count) * Number of clocked states: 0 () * Top-level inputs: 0 Notification: Strong component statistics for simulation (210): * Single equations (assignments): 199 * Array equations: 0 * Algorithm blocks: 0 * Record equations: 2 * When equations: 2 * If-equations: 0 * Equation systems (not torn): 0 * Torn equation systems: 7 * Mixed (continuous/discrete) equation systems: 0 Notification: Torn system details for strict tearing set: * Linear torn systems (#iteration vars, #inner vars, density): 7 systems {(1,9,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,9,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%)} * Non-linear torn systems (#iteration vars, #inner vars): 0 systems Notification: Performance of Backend phase and start with SimCode phase: time 0.01533/1.866, allocations: 8.22 MB / 1.669 GB, free: 12.61 MB / 1.373 GB Notification: Performance of simCode: created initialization part: time 0.02171/1.888, allocations: 13.44 MB / 1.682 GB, free: 15 MB / 1.389 GB Notification: Performance of simCode: created event and clocks part: time 9.768e-06/1.888, allocations: 3.938 kB / 1.682 GB, free: 14.99 MB / 1.389 GB Notification: Performance of simCode: created simulation system equations: time 0.004728/1.893, allocations: 3.059 MB / 1.685 GB, free: 11.84 MB / 1.389 GB Notification: Performance of simCode: created of all other equations (e.g. parameter, nominal, assert, etc): time 0.01821/1.911, allocations: 2.926 MB / 1.688 GB, free: 8.957 MB / 1.389 GB Notification: Performance of simCode: created linear, non-linear and system jacobian parts: time 0.1702/2.081, allocations: 80.02 MB / 1.766 GB, free: 5.555 MB / 1.467 GB Notification: Performance of simCode: some other stuff during SimCode phase: time 0.009679/2.091, allocations: 5.369 MB / 1.771 GB, free: 152 kB / 1.467 GB Notification: Performance of simCode: alias equations: time 0.01603/2.107, allocations: 6.434 MB / 1.778 GB, free: 9.727 MB / 1.482 GB Notification: Performance of simCode: all other stuff during SimCode phase: time 0.008376/2.116, allocations: 2.979 MB / 1.781 GB, free: 6.746 MB / 1.482 GB Notification: Performance of SimCode: time 1.293e-06/2.116, allocations: 0 / 1.781 GB, free: 6.746 MB / 1.482 GB Notification: Performance of buildModelFMU: Generate the FMI files: time 0.8659/2.982, allocations: 201.9 MB / 1.978 GB, free: 413.4 MB / 1.514 GB Notification: Performance of buildModelFMU: Generate platform static: time 24.09/27.07, allocations: 19.17 kB / 1.978 GB, free: 413.4 MB / 1.514 GB (rm -f Buildings_latest_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference.pipe ; mkfifo Buildings_latest_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference.pipe ; head -c 1048576 < Buildings_latest_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference.pipe >> ../files/Buildings_latest_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference.sim & python3 -m fmpy simulate --output-file Buildings_latest_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference_res.csv --start-time 0 --stop-time 86400 --timeout 50 --relative-tolerance 1e-06 --interface-type ModelExchange --solver CVode --output-interval 34.56 Buildings_latest_Buildings_Fluid_HeatExchangers_RadiantSlabs_Examples_StepResponseFiniteDifference.fmu > Buildings_latest_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference.pipe 2>&1) diffSimulationResults("Buildings_latest_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference_res.csv","/mnt/ReferenceFiles/Buildings/csv/master/Buildings_Fluid_HeatExchangers_RadiantSlabs_Examples_StepResponseFiniteDifference.csv","/var/lib/jenkins1/ws/OpenModelicaLibraryTestingWork/OpenModelicaLibraryTesting/files/Buildings_latest_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference.diff",relTol=0.003,relTolDiffMinMax=0.003,rangeDelta=0.001) Reference file matches