Running: ./testmodel.py --libraries=/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries --ompython_omhome=/usr Buildings_9_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.conf.json
loadFile("/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/ModelicaServices 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo", uses=false)
loadFile("/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Complex 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo", uses=false)
loadFile("/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Modelica 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo", uses=false)
loadFile("/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Buildings 9.1.3-maint.9.1.x/package.mo", uses=false)
Using package Buildings with version 9.1.3 (/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Buildings 9.1.3-maint.9.1.x/package.mo)
Using package Modelica with version 4.0.0 (/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Modelica 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo)
Using package Complex with version 4.0.0 (/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Complex 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo)
Using package ModelicaServices with version 4.0.0 (/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/ModelicaServices 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo)
Running command: "" <> buildModelFMU(Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU,fileNamePrefix="Buildings_9_Buildings_Fluid_HeatExchangers_RadiantSlabs_Examples_StepResponseEpsilonNTU",fmuType="me",version="2.0",platforms={"static"})
"" <> buildModelFMU(Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU,fileNamePrefix="Buildings_9_Buildings_Fluid_HeatExchangers_RadiantSlabs_Examples_StepResponseEpsilonNTU",fmuType="me",version="2.0",platforms={"static"})
Notification: Performance of loadFile(/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/ModelicaServices 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo): time 0.008231/0.008231, allocations: 99.34 kB / 15.73 MB, free: 6.008 MB / 14.72 MB
Notification: Performance of loadFile(/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Complex 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo): time 0.001645/0.001645, allocations: 197.3 kB / 16.67 MB, free: 5.934 MB / 14.72 MB
Notification: Performance of loadFile(/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Modelica 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo): time 1.239/1.239, allocations: 222.9 MB / 240.4 MB, free: 4.336 MB / 190.1 MB
Notification: Performance of loadFile(/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Buildings 9.1.3-maint.9.1.x/package.mo): time 2.173/2.173, allocations: 390.2 MB / 0.6648 GB, free: 180 kB / 0.5137 GB
Notification: Performance of FrontEnd - loaded program: time 0.00122/0.00122, allocations: 63.16 kB / 0.9504 GB, free: 5.906 MB / 0.7169 GB
Notification: Performance of FrontEnd - Absyn->SCode: time 0.2468/0.248, allocations: 140.4 MB / 1.087 GB, free: 1.977 MB / 0.8419 GB
Notification: Performance of NFInst.instantiate(Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU): time 0.02764/0.2757, allocations: 31.76 MB / 1.118 GB, free: 2.102 MB / 0.8731 GB
Notification: Performance of NFInst.instExpressions: time 0.01585/0.2916, allocations: 12.28 MB / 1.13 GB, free: 5.781 MB / 0.8887 GB
Notification: Performance of NFInst.updateImplicitVariability: time 0.002144/0.2938, allocations: 67.62 kB / 1.131 GB, free: 5.715 MB / 0.8887 GB
Notification: Performance of NFTyping.typeComponents: time 0.003016/0.2968, allocations: 1.115 MB / 1.132 GB, free: 4.594 MB / 0.8887 GB
Notification: Performance of NFTyping.typeBindings: time 0.005145/0.302, allocations: 2.145 MB / 1.134 GB, free: 2.441 MB / 0.8887 GB
Notification: Performance of NFTyping.typeClassSections: time 0.0045/0.3065, allocations: 1.878 MB / 1.136 GB, free: 0.5703 MB / 0.8887 GB
Notification: Performance of NFFlatten.flatten: time 0.01703/0.3235, allocations: 19.57 MB / 1.155 GB, free: 12.96 MB / 0.92 GB
Notification: Performance of NFFlatten.resolveConnections: time 0.008296/0.3319, allocations: 7.204 MB / 1.162 GB, free: 5.676 MB / 0.92 GB
Notification: Performance of NFEvalConstants.evaluate: time 0.01068/0.3426, allocations: 6.528 MB / 1.168 GB, free: 15.14 MB / 0.9356 GB
Notification: Performance of NFSimplifyModel.simplify: time 0.008675/0.3513, allocations: 5.356 MB / 1.173 GB, free: 9.77 MB / 0.9356 GB
Notification: Performance of NFPackage.collectConstants: time 0.002325/0.3536, allocations: 0.7538 MB / 1.174 GB, free: 9.016 MB / 0.9356 GB
Notification: Performance of NFFlatten.collectFunctions: time 0.007358/0.361, allocations: 3.215 MB / 1.177 GB, free: 5.801 MB / 0.9356 GB
Notification: Performance of NFScalarize.scalarize: time 0.003897/0.3649, allocations: 3.003 MB / 1.18 GB, free: 2.789 MB / 0.9356 GB
Notification: Performance of NFVerifyModel.verify: time 0.008714/0.3736, allocations: 4.753 MB / 1.185 GB, free: 14.02 MB / 0.9512 GB
Notification: Performance of NFConvertDAE.convert: time 0.02017/0.3938, allocations: 15.48 MB / 1.2 GB, free: 14.48 MB / 0.9669 GB
Notification: Performance of FrontEnd - DAE generated: time 6.232e-06/0.3939, allocations: 0 / 1.2 GB, free: 14.48 MB / 0.9669 GB
Notification: Performance of FrontEnd: time 2.003e-06/0.3939, allocations: 0 / 1.2 GB, free: 14.48 MB / 0.9669 GB
Notification: Performance of Transformations before backend: time 0.0004608/0.3943, allocations: 0 / 1.2 GB, free: 14.48 MB / 0.9669 GB
Notification: Model statistics after passing the front-end and creating the data structures used by the back-end:
 * Number of equations: 866
 * Number of variables: 866
Notification: Performance of Generate backend data structure: time 0.02909/0.4234, allocations: 11.76 MB / 1.211 GB, free: 2.617 MB / 0.9669 GB
Notification: Performance of prepare preOptimizeDAE: time 4.188e-05/0.4235, allocations: 12.03 kB / 1.211 GB, free: 2.605 MB / 0.9669 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt introduceOutputAliases (simulation): time 0.001269/0.4248, allocations: 0.5 MB / 1.212 GB, free: 2.094 MB / 0.9669 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt normalInlineFunction (simulation): time 0.00283/0.4276, allocations: 0.9202 MB / 1.213 GB, free: 1.168 MB / 0.9669 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt evaluateParameters (simulation): time 0.01926/0.4469, allocations: 9.665 MB / 1.222 GB, free: 7.434 MB / 0.9825 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt simplifyIfEquations (simulation): time 0.0002417/0.4472, allocations: 342.7 kB / 1.223 GB, free: 7.098 MB / 0.9825 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt expandDerOperator (simulation): time 0.001034/0.4482, allocations: 483.9 kB / 1.223 GB, free: 6.625 MB / 0.9825 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt clockPartitioning (simulation): time 0.008581/0.4568, allocations: 5.956 MB / 1.229 GB, free: 444 kB / 0.9825 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt findStateOrder (simulation): time 7.364e-05/0.4569, allocations: 15.81 kB / 1.229 GB, free: 428 kB / 0.9825 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt replaceEdgeChange (simulation): time 0.0003388/0.4572, allocations: 148 kB / 1.229 GB, free: 280 kB / 0.9825 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt inlineArrayEqn (simulation): time 8.177e-05/0.4573, allocations: 99.98 kB / 1.229 GB, free: 180 kB / 0.9825 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt removeEqualRHS (simulation): time 0.006525/0.4638, allocations: 4.762 MB / 1.234 GB, free: 11.4 MB / 0.9981 GB
Warning: The model contains alias variables with redundant start and/or conflicting nominal values. It is recommended to resolve the conflicts, because otherwise the system could be hard to solve. To print the conflicting alias sets and the chosen candidates please use -d=aliasConflicts.
Notification: Performance of preOpt removeSimpleEquations (simulation): time 0.532/0.9959, allocations: 33.79 MB / 1.267 GB, free: 140.7 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt comSubExp (simulation): time 0.01219/1.008, allocations: 6.233 MB / 1.273 GB, free: 139.6 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt resolveLoops (simulation): time 0.004004/1.012, allocations: 2.559 MB / 1.275 GB, free: 138.9 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt evalFunc (simulation): time 0.02403/1.036, allocations: 13.24 MB / 1.288 GB, free: 132.9 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt encapsulateWhenConditions (simulation): time 0.00333/1.04, allocations: 2.13 MB / 1.29 GB, free: 132.3 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of pre-optimization done (n=224): time 7.474e-06/1.04, allocations: 1.125 kB / 1.29 GB, free: 132.3 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of matching and sorting (n=232): time 0.02824/1.068, allocations: 14.28 MB / 1.304 GB, free: 125.3 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of inlineWhenForInitialization (initialization): time 6.252e-05/1.068, allocations: 130.5 kB / 1.304 GB, free: 125.1 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of selectInitializationVariablesDAE (initialization): time 0.01805/1.086, allocations: 10.43 MB / 1.315 GB, free: 120 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of collectPreVariables (initialization): time 0.0008411/1.087, allocations: 119.1 kB / 1.315 GB, free: 119.9 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of collectInitialEqns (initialization): time 0.003672/1.091, allocations: 3.349 MB / 1.318 GB, free: 117.3 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of collectInitialBindings (initialization): time 0.001596/1.092, allocations: 0.9065 MB / 1.319 GB, free: 116.6 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of simplifyInitialFunctions (initialization): time 0.003029/1.095, allocations: 1.217 MB / 1.32 GB, free: 116 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of setup shared object (initialization): time 4.19e-05/1.095, allocations: 302.6 kB / 1.32 GB, free: 115.7 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of preBalanceInitialSystem (initialization): time 0.004369/1.1, allocations: 3.447 MB / 1.324 GB, free: 114 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of partitionIndependentBlocks (initialization): time 0.005065/1.105, allocations: 5.939 MB / 1.329 GB, free: 108 MB / 1.014 GB
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3]))
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3]))
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3]))
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]))
Notification: Performance of analyzeInitialSystem (initialization): time 0.04473/1.15, allocations: 36.64 MB / 1.365 GB, free: 70.05 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of solveInitialSystemEqSystem (initialization): time 7.23e-05/1.15, allocations: 28 kB / 1.365 GB, free: 70.02 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of matching and sorting (n=659) (initialization): time 0.01421/1.164, allocations: 10.11 MB / 1.375 GB, free: 59.83 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of prepare postOptimizeDAE: time 9.588e-05/1.164, allocations: 69.64 kB / 1.375 GB, free: 59.75 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyComplexFunction (initialization): time 0.0001047/1.164, allocations: 84 kB / 1.375 GB, free: 59.67 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt tearingSystem (initialization): time 0.001399/1.165, allocations: 0.7195 MB / 1.376 GB, free: 58.93 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt solveSimpleEquations (initialization): time 0.004487/1.17, allocations: 1.482 MB / 1.377 GB, free: 57.45 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt calculateStrongComponentJacobians (initialization): time 0.008139/1.178, allocations: 14.52 MB / 1.392 GB, free: 41.98 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyAllExpressions (initialization): time 0.008549/1.187, allocations: 1.18 MB / 1.393 GB, free: 40.8 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt collapseArrayExpressions (initialization): time 0.0009879/1.188, allocations: 276 kB / 1.393 GB, free: 40.54 MB / 1.014 GB
Warning: The initial conditions are over specified. The following 8 initial equations are redundant, so they are removed from the initialization system:
         sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start
         sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start
         sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start
         sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start
         sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3])
         sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3])
         sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3])
         sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]).
Notification: Performance of preBalanceInitialSystem (initialization_lambda0): time 0.009/1.197, allocations: 7.096 MB / 1.4 GB, free: 33.43 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of partitionIndependentBlocks (initialization_lambda0): time 0.005267/1.202, allocations: 5.928 MB / 1.406 GB, free: 26.3 MB / 1.014 GB
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3]))
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3]))
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3]))
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]))
Notification: Performance of analyzeInitialSystem (initialization_lambda0): time 0.04718/1.249, allocations: 36.57 MB / 1.441 GB, free: 4.289 MB / 1.029 GB
Notification: Performance of solveInitialSystemEqSystem (initialization_lambda0): time 6.781e-05/1.249, allocations: 24 kB / 1.442 GB, free: 4.266 MB / 1.029 GB
Notification: Performance of matching and sorting (n=659) (initialization_lambda0): time 0.01689/1.266, allocations: 10.1 MB / 1.451 GB, free: 10.08 MB / 1.045 GB
Notification: Performance of prepare postOptimizeDAE: time 0.0001098/1.266, allocations: 79.09 kB / 1.451 GB, free: 10 MB / 1.045 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyComplexFunction (initialization): time 0.0001152/1.266, allocations: 84.84 kB / 1.452 GB, free: 9.918 MB / 1.045 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt tearingSystem (initialization): time 0.00154/1.268, allocations: 0.7075 MB / 1.452 GB, free: 9.191 MB / 1.045 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt solveSimpleEquations (initialization): time 0.004972/1.273, allocations: 1.482 MB / 1.454 GB, free: 7.707 MB / 1.045 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt calculateStrongComponentJacobians (initialization): time 0.01121/1.284, allocations: 14.54 MB / 1.468 GB, free: 8.211 MB / 1.061 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyAllExpressions (initialization): time 0.009029/1.293, allocations: 1.176 MB / 1.469 GB, free: 7.035 MB / 1.061 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt collapseArrayExpressions (initialization): time 0.001097/1.294, allocations: 276 kB / 1.469 GB, free: 6.766 MB / 1.061 GB
Warning: The initial conditions are over specified. The following 8 initial equations are redundant, so they are removed from the initialization_lambda0 system:
         sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start
         sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start
         sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start
         sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start
         sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3])
         sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3])
         sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3])
         sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]).
Notification: Model statistics after passing the back-end for initialization:
 * Number of independent subsystems: 384
 * Number of states: 0 ()
 * Number of discrete variables: 5 ($PRE.pulse.count,$PRE.pulse.T_start,pulse.count,pulse.T_start,$whenCondition1)
 * Number of discrete states: 0 ()
 * Number of clocked states: 0 ()
 * Top-level inputs: 0
Notification: Strong component statistics for initialization (635):
 * Single equations (assignments): 627
 * Array equations: 0
 * Algorithm blocks: 1
 * Record equations: 0
 * When equations: 0
 * If-equations: 0
 * Equation systems (not torn): 0
 * Torn equation systems: 7
 * Mixed (continuous/discrete) equation systems: 0
Notification: Torn system details for strict tearing set:
 * Linear torn systems (#iteration vars, #inner vars, density): 7 systems
   {(1,9,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,9,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%)}
 * Non-linear torn systems (#iteration vars, #inner vars): 0 systems
Notification: Performance of prepare postOptimizeDAE: time 0.002174/1.297, allocations: 0.7565 MB / 1.47 GB, free: 6.043 MB / 1.061 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt lateInlineFunction (simulation): time 0.002457/1.299, allocations: 0.6945 MB / 1.471 GB, free: 5.344 MB / 1.061 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt wrapFunctionCalls (simulation): time 0.009848/1.309, allocations: 5.15 MB / 1.476 GB, free: 168 kB / 1.061 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt inlineArrayEqn (simulation): time 2.91e-05/1.309, allocations: 24 kB / 1.476 GB, free: 144 kB / 1.061 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt constantLinearSystem (simulation): time 2.053e-05/1.309, allocations: 4 kB / 1.476 GB, free: 140 kB / 1.061 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifysemiLinear (simulation): time 0.005631/1.315, allocations: 3.962 MB / 1.48 GB, free: 12.14 MB / 1.076 GB
Warning: The model contains alias variables with redundant start and/or conflicting nominal values. It is recommended to resolve the conflicts, because otherwise the system could be hard to solve. To print the conflicting alias sets and the chosen candidates please use -d=aliasConflicts.
Notification: Performance of postOpt removeSimpleEquations (simulation): time 0.02767/1.342, allocations: 13.42 MB / 1.493 GB, free: 14.55 MB / 1.092 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyComplexFunction (simulation): time 1.115e-05/1.342, allocations: 0 / 1.493 GB, free: 14.55 MB / 1.092 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt solveSimpleEquations (simulation): time 0.002579/1.345, allocations: 0.5968 MB / 1.493 GB, free: 13.95 MB / 1.092 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt tearingSystem (simulation): time 0.001415/1.346, allocations: 0.5795 MB / 1.494 GB, free: 13.35 MB / 1.092 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt inputDerivativesUsed (simulation): time 0.0003833/1.347, allocations: 135.9 kB / 1.494 GB, free: 13.21 MB / 1.092 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt calculateStrongComponentJacobians (simulation): time 0.01131/1.358, allocations: 14.4 MB / 1.508 GB, free: 13.85 MB / 1.107 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt calculateStateSetsJacobians (simulation): time 2.936e-06/1.358, allocations: 4.062 kB / 1.508 GB, free: 13.85 MB / 1.107 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt symbolicJacobian (simulation): time 0.01193/1.37, allocations: 7.153 MB / 1.515 GB, free: 6.609 MB / 1.107 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt removeConstants (simulation): time 0.005321/1.376, allocations: 1.697 MB / 1.517 GB, free: 4.891 MB / 1.107 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyTimeIndepFuncCalls (simulation): time 0.002304/1.378, allocations: 127.9 kB / 1.517 GB, free: 4.766 MB / 1.107 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyAllExpressions (simulation): time 0.005577/1.383, allocations: 0.6164 MB / 1.517 GB, free: 4.148 MB / 1.107 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt findZeroCrossings (simulation): time 0.0005155/1.384, allocations: 165.7 kB / 1.518 GB, free: 3.984 MB / 1.107 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt collapseArrayExpressions (simulation): time 0.0003278/1.384, allocations: 84.61 kB / 1.518 GB, free: 3.902 MB / 1.107 GB
Notification: Performance of sorting global known variables: time 0.01574/1.4, allocations: 7.335 MB / 1.525 GB, free: 12.58 MB / 1.123 GB
Notification: Performance of sort global known variables: time 6.31e-07/1.4, allocations: 7.938 kB / 1.525 GB, free: 12.57 MB / 1.123 GB
Notification: Performance of remove unused functions: time 0.01852/1.419, allocations: 3.961 MB / 1.529 GB, free: 8.648 MB / 1.123 GB
Notification: Model statistics after passing the back-end for simulation:
 * Number of independent subsystems: 12
 * Number of states: 43 (sla.vol[1].dynBal.U,sla.vol[2].dynBal.U,sla.vol[3].dynBal.U,sla.vol[4].dynBal.U,sla.vol[5].dynBal.U,sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_b[1].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[2].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[3].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[4].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[5].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T[3],TOut.T)
 * Number of discrete variables: 3 ($whenCondition1,pulse.T_start,pulse.count)
 * Number of discrete states: 1 (pulse.count)
 * Number of clocked states: 0 ()
 * Top-level inputs: 0
Notification: Strong component statistics for simulation (210):
 * Single equations (assignments): 199
 * Array equations: 0
 * Algorithm blocks: 0
 * Record equations: 2
 * When equations: 2
 * If-equations: 0
 * Equation systems (not torn): 0
 * Torn equation systems: 7
 * Mixed (continuous/discrete) equation systems: 0
Notification: Torn system details for strict tearing set:
 * Linear torn systems (#iteration vars, #inner vars, density): 7 systems
   {(1,9,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,9,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%)}
 * Non-linear torn systems (#iteration vars, #inner vars): 0 systems
Notification: Performance of Backend phase and start with SimCode phase: time 0.01465/1.433, allocations: 8.219 MB / 1.537 GB, free: 428 kB / 1.123 GB
Notification: Performance of simCode: created initialization part: time 0.02107/1.454, allocations: 13.44 MB / 1.55 GB, free: 2.809 MB / 1.139 GB
Notification: Performance of simCode: created event and clocks part: time 1.7e-05/1.454, allocations: 9.969 kB / 1.55 GB, free: 2.801 MB / 1.139 GB
Notification: Performance of simCode: created simulation system equations: time 0.004697/1.459, allocations: 3.048 MB / 1.553 GB, free: 15.66 MB / 1.154 GB
Notification: Performance of simCode: created of all other equations (e.g. parameter, nominal, assert, etc): time 0.01649/1.476, allocations: 2.933 MB / 1.556 GB, free: 12.77 MB / 1.154 GB
Notification: Performance of simCode: created linear, non-linear and system jacobian parts: time 0.1368/1.612, allocations: 80.03 MB / 1.634 GB, free: 9.438 MB / 1.232 GB
Notification: Performance of simCode: some other stuff during SimCode phase: time 0.005592/1.618, allocations: 5.369 MB / 1.639 GB, free: 4.031 MB / 1.232 GB
Notification: Performance of simCode: alias equations: time 0.01283/1.631, allocations: 6.427 MB / 1.645 GB, free: 13.61 MB / 1.248 GB
Notification: Performance of simCode: all other stuff during SimCode phase: time 0.00561/1.637, allocations: 2.983 MB / 1.648 GB, free: 10.64 MB / 1.248 GB
Notification: Performance of SimCode: time 6.91e-07/1.637, allocations: 0 / 1.648 GB, free: 10.64 MB / 1.248 GB
Notification: Performance of buildModelFMU: Generate the FMI files: time 0.7656/2.402, allocations: 201.9 MB / 1.845 GB, free: 440.5 MB / 1.357 GB
Notification: Performance of buildModelFMU: Generate platform static: time 23.9/26.3, allocations: 13.98 kB / 1.845 GB, free: 440.5 MB / 1.357 GB
(rm -f Buildings_9_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.pipe ; mkfifo Buildings_9_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.pipe ; head -c 1048576 < Buildings_9_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.pipe >> ../files/Buildings_9_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.sim & python3 -m fmpy simulate  --output-file Buildings_9_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU_res.csv --start-time 0 --stop-time 86400 --timeout 50 --relative-tolerance 1e-06 --interface-type ModelExchange --solver CVode --output-interval 34.56 Buildings_9_Buildings_Fluid_HeatExchangers_RadiantSlabs_Examples_StepResponseEpsilonNTU.fmu > Buildings_9_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.pipe 2>&1)
diffSimulationResults("Buildings_9_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU_res.csv","/mnt/ReferenceFiles/Buildings/csv/maint_9.1.x/Buildings_Fluid_HeatExchangers_RadiantSlabs_Examples_StepResponseEpsilonNTU.csv","/var/lib/jenkins1/ws/OpenModelicaLibraryTestingWork/OpenModelicaLibraryTesting/files/Buildings_9_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.diff",relTol=0.003,relTolDiffMinMax=0.003,rangeDelta=0.001)
Reference file matches