Running: ./testmodel.py --libraries=/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries --ompython_omhome=/usr Buildings_11_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.conf.json loadFile("/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/ModelicaServices 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo", uses=false) [Timeout 180] "Notification: Performance of loadFile(/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/ModelicaServices 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo): time 0.00141/0.00141, allocations: 110.4 kB / 17.54 MB, free: 4.641 MB / 14.72 MB " [Timeout remaining time 180] loadFile("/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Complex 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo", uses=false) [Timeout 180] "Notification: Performance of loadFile(/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Complex 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo): time 0.001454/0.001454, allocations: 189.9 kB / 20.71 MB, free: 1.484 MB / 14.72 MB " [Timeout remaining time 180] loadFile("/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Modelica 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo", uses=false) [Timeout 180] "Notification: Performance of loadFile(/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Modelica 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo): time 1.295/1.295, allocations: 225.6 MB / 249.3 MB, free: 3.18 MB / 190.1 MB " [Timeout remaining time 179] loadFile("/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Buildings 11.1.0-maint.11.x/package.mo", uses=false) [Timeout 180] "Notification: Performance of loadFile(/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Buildings 11.1.0-maint.11.x/package.mo): time 2.484/2.484, allocations: 476.7 MB / 0.7628 GB, free: 15.12 MB / 0.6075 GB " [Timeout remaining time 177] Using package Buildings with version 11.1.0 (/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Buildings 11.1.0-maint.11.x/package.mo) Using package Modelica with version 4.0.0 (/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Modelica 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo) Using package Complex with version 4.0.0 (/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Complex 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo) Using package ModelicaServices with version 4.0.0 (/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/ModelicaServices 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo) Running command: "" <> buildModelFMU(Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU,fileNamePrefix="Buildings_11_Buildings_Fluid_HeatExchangers_RadiantSlabs_Examples_StepResponseEpsilonNTU",fmuType="me",version="2.0",platforms={"static"}) "" <> buildModelFMU(Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU,fileNamePrefix="Buildings_11_Buildings_Fluid_HeatExchangers_RadiantSlabs_Examples_StepResponseEpsilonNTU",fmuType="me",version="2.0",platforms={"static"}) [Timeout 300] "Notification: Performance of FrontEnd - loaded program: time 0.001922/0.001922, allocations: 71.89 kB / 1.107 GB, free: 5.152 MB / 0.8419 GB Notification: Performance of FrontEnd - Absyn->SCode: time 0.806/0.8079, allocations: 168.7 MB / 1.271 GB, free: 7.715 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of NFInst.instantiate(Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU): time 0.03069/0.8386, allocations: 32.29 MB / 1.303 GB, free: 0.8086 MB / 1.014 GB Notification: Performance of NFInst.instExpressions: time 0.01924/0.8578, allocations: 12.38 MB / 1.315 GB, free: 8.086 MB / 1.029 GB Notification: Performance of NFInst.updateImplicitVariability: time 0.002624/0.8604, allocations: 64.06 kB / 1.315 GB, free: 8.062 MB / 1.029 GB Notification: Performance of NFTyping.typeComponents: time 0.003426/0.8639, allocations: 1.127 MB / 1.316 GB, free: 7.477 MB / 1.029 GB Notification: Performance of NFTyping.typeBindings: time 0.006235/0.8701, allocations: 2.153 MB / 1.318 GB, free: 6.23 MB / 1.029 GB Notification: Performance of NFTyping.typeClassSections: time 0.005489/0.8756, allocations: 1.883 MB / 1.32 GB, free: 5.289 MB / 1.029 GB Notification: Performance of NFFlatten.flatten: time 0.02231/0.8979, allocations: 19.62 MB / 1.339 GB, free: 13.07 MB / 1.045 GB Notification: Performance of NFFlatten.resolveConnections: time 0.008071/0.906, allocations: 5.363 MB / 1.345 GB, free: 10.89 MB / 1.045 GB Notification: Performance of NFEvalConstants.evaluate: time 0.01233/0.9183, allocations: 6.566 MB / 1.351 GB, free: 8.004 MB / 1.045 GB Notification: Performance of NFSimplifyModel.simplify: time 0.01123/0.9295, allocations: 5.646 MB / 1.356 GB, free: 4.562 MB / 1.045 GB Notification: Performance of NFPackage.collectConstants: time 0.003245/0.9328, allocations: 0.7491 MB / 1.357 GB, free: 4.562 MB / 1.045 GB Notification: Performance of NFFlatten.collectFunctions: time 0.009495/0.9423, allocations: 3.245 MB / 1.36 GB, free: 3.086 MB / 1.045 GB Notification: Performance of NFScalarize.scalarize: time 0.005343/0.9476, allocations: 3.08 MB / 1.363 GB, free: 0.957 MB / 1.045 GB Notification: Performance of NFVerifyModel.verify: time 0.01067/0.9583, allocations: 4.753 MB / 1.368 GB, free: 13.73 MB / 1.061 GB Notification: Performance of NFConvertDAE.convert: time 0.02263/0.9809, allocations: 15.48 MB / 1.383 GB, free: 2.602 MB / 1.061 GB Notification: Performance of FrontEnd - DAE generated: time 5.881e-06/0.9809, allocations: 0 / 1.383 GB, free: 2.602 MB / 1.061 GB Notification: Performance of FrontEnd: time 1.733e-06/0.9809, allocations: 0 / 1.383 GB, free: 2.602 MB / 1.061 GB Notification: Performance of Transformations before backend: time 0.0003877/0.9813, allocations: 0 / 1.383 GB, free: 2.602 MB / 1.061 GB Notification: Model statistics after passing the front-end and creating the data structures used by the back-end: * Number of equations: 866 * Number of variables: 866 Notification: Performance of Generate backend data structure: time 0.03051/1.012, allocations: 11.77 MB / 1.395 GB, free: 6.719 MB / 1.076 GB Notification: Performance of prepare preOptimizeDAE: time 4.003e-05/1.012, allocations: 8.031 kB / 1.395 GB, free: 6.711 MB / 1.076 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt introduceOutputAliases (simulation): time 0.001511/1.013, allocations: 496.3 kB / 1.395 GB, free: 6.215 MB / 1.076 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt normalInlineFunction (simulation): time 0.003456/1.017, allocations: 0.9207 MB / 1.396 GB, free: 5.289 MB / 1.076 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt evaluateParameters (simulation): time 0.01948/1.036, allocations: 9.679 MB / 1.405 GB, free: 11.54 MB / 1.092 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt simplifyIfEquations (simulation): time 0.0002938/1.037, allocations: 330.8 kB / 1.406 GB, free: 11.21 MB / 1.092 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt expandDerOperator (simulation): time 0.001163/1.038, allocations: 483.9 kB / 1.406 GB, free: 10.74 MB / 1.092 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt clockPartitioning (simulation): time 0.009031/1.047, allocations: 5.96 MB / 1.412 GB, free: 4.543 MB / 1.092 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt findStateOrder (simulation): time 6.527e-05/1.047, allocations: 15.88 kB / 1.412 GB, free: 4.527 MB / 1.092 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt replaceEdgeChange (simulation): time 0.0003628/1.047, allocations: 144 kB / 1.412 GB, free: 4.387 MB / 1.092 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt inlineArrayEqn (simulation): time 9.386e-05/1.047, allocations: 99.73 kB / 1.412 GB, free: 4.293 MB / 1.092 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt removeEqualRHS (simulation): time 0.00696/1.054, allocations: 4.758 MB / 1.417 GB, free: 15.52 MB / 1.107 GB Warning: The model contains alias variables with redundant start and/or conflicting nominal values. It is recommended to resolve the conflicts, because otherwise the system could be hard to solve. To print the conflicting alias sets and the chosen candidates please use -d=aliasConflicts. Notification: Performance of preOpt removeSimpleEquations (simulation): time 0.05062/1.105, allocations: 33.81 MB / 1.45 GB, free: 12.07 MB / 1.139 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt comSubExp (simulation): time 0.01105/1.116, allocations: 6.041 MB / 1.456 GB, free: 5.922 MB / 1.139 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt resolveLoops (simulation): time 0.0036/1.12, allocations: 2.434 MB / 1.458 GB, free: 3.492 MB / 1.139 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt evalFunc (simulation): time 0.02231/1.142, allocations: 13.25 MB / 1.471 GB, free: 5.695 MB / 1.154 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt encapsulateWhenConditions (simulation): time 0.003114/1.145, allocations: 2.134 MB / 1.473 GB, free: 3.543 MB / 1.154 GB Notification: Performance of pre-optimization done (n=224): time 4.468e-06/1.145, allocations: 0 / 1.473 GB, free: 3.543 MB / 1.154 GB Notification: Performance of matching and sorting (n=232): time 0.02665/1.172, allocations: 14.27 MB / 1.487 GB, free: 5.109 MB / 1.17 GB Notification: Performance of inlineWhenForInitialization (initialization): time 8.78e-05/1.172, allocations: 136.8 kB / 1.487 GB, free: 4.949 MB / 1.17 GB Notification: Performance of selectInitializationVariablesDAE (initialization): time 0.01896/1.191, allocations: 10.43 MB / 1.497 GB, free: 10.53 MB / 1.186 GB Notification: Performance of collectPreVariables (initialization): time 0.000761/1.191, allocations: 113.7 kB / 1.498 GB, free: 10.41 MB / 1.186 GB Notification: Performance of collectInitialEqns (initialization): time 0.004366/1.196, allocations: 3.349 MB / 1.501 GB, free: 7.043 MB / 1.186 GB Notification: Performance of collectInitialBindings (initialization): time 0.001855/1.198, allocations: 0.9143 MB / 1.502 GB, free: 6.121 MB / 1.186 GB Notification: Performance of simplifyInitialFunctions (initialization): time 0.002644/1.2, allocations: 1.214 MB / 1.503 GB, free: 4.898 MB / 1.186 GB Notification: Performance of setup shared object (initialization): time 0.0001126/1.2, allocations: 305.1 kB / 1.503 GB, free: 4.598 MB / 1.186 GB Notification: Performance of preBalanceInitialSystem (initialization): time 0.00496/1.205, allocations: 3.451 MB / 1.507 GB, free: 1.129 MB / 1.186 GB Notification: Performance of partitionIndependentBlocks (initialization): time 0.006769/1.212, allocations: 5.932 MB / 1.512 GB, free: 9.988 MB / 1.201 GB Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3])) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3])) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3])) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3])) Notification: Performance of analyzeInitialSystem (initialization): time 0.05551/1.268, allocations: 36.65 MB / 1.548 GB, free: 3.895 MB / 1.232 GB Notification: Performance of solveInitialSystemEqSystem (initialization): time 5.923e-05/1.268, allocations: 24 kB / 1.548 GB, free: 3.871 MB / 1.232 GB Notification: Performance of matching and sorting (n=659) (initialization): time 0.01762/1.285, allocations: 10.11 MB / 1.558 GB, free: 9.684 MB / 1.248 GB Notification: Performance of prepare postOptimizeDAE: time 9.875e-05/1.285, allocations: 65.7 kB / 1.558 GB, free: 9.613 MB / 1.248 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyComplexFunction (initialization): time 0.0001243/1.286, allocations: 84 kB / 1.558 GB, free: 9.531 MB / 1.248 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt tearingSystem (initialization): time 0.001693/1.287, allocations: 0.72 MB / 1.559 GB, free: 8.789 MB / 1.248 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt solveSimpleEquations (initialization): time 0.005006/1.292, allocations: 1.478 MB / 1.56 GB, free: 7.309 MB / 1.248 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt calculateStrongComponentJacobians (initialization): time 0.01318/1.305, allocations: 14.52 MB / 1.575 GB, free: 7.809 MB / 1.264 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyAllExpressions (initialization): time 0.009085/1.315, allocations: 1.182 MB / 1.576 GB, free: 6.625 MB / 1.264 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt collapseArrayExpressions (initialization): time 0.001096/1.316, allocations: 280 kB / 1.576 GB, free: 6.352 MB / 1.264 GB Warning: The initial conditions are over specified. The following 8 initial equations are redundant, so they are removed from the initialization system: sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3]) sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3]) sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3]) sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]). Notification: Performance of preBalanceInitialSystem (initialization_lambda0): time 0.0121/1.328, allocations: 7.083 MB / 1.583 GB, free: 15.26 MB / 1.279 GB Notification: Performance of partitionIndependentBlocks (initialization_lambda0): time 0.007838/1.336, allocations: 5.932 MB / 1.589 GB, free: 8.121 MB / 1.279 GB Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3])) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3])) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3])) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3])) Notification: Performance of analyzeInitialSystem (initialization_lambda0): time 0.0588/1.394, allocations: 36.56 MB / 1.624 GB, free: 2.105 MB / 1.311 GB Notification: Performance of solveInitialSystemEqSystem (initialization_lambda0): time 6.887e-05/1.394, allocations: 24 kB / 1.624 GB, free: 2.082 MB / 1.311 GB Notification: Performance of matching and sorting (n=659) (initialization_lambda0): time 0.01741/1.412, allocations: 10.1 MB / 1.634 GB, free: 7.898 MB / 1.326 GB Notification: Performance of prepare postOptimizeDAE: time 0.0001028/1.412, allocations: 73.7 kB / 1.634 GB, free: 7.82 MB / 1.326 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyComplexFunction (initialization): time 0.0001134/1.412, allocations: 84 kB / 1.634 GB, free: 7.738 MB / 1.326 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt tearingSystem (initialization): time 0.001598/1.414, allocations: 0.7088 MB / 1.635 GB, free: 7.008 MB / 1.326 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt solveSimpleEquations (initialization): time 0.004948/1.419, allocations: 1.474 MB / 1.637 GB, free: 5.531 MB / 1.326 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt calculateStrongComponentJacobians (initialization): time 0.01294/1.432, allocations: 14.53 MB / 1.651 GB, free: 6.016 MB / 1.342 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyAllExpressions (initialization): time 0.009091/1.441, allocations: 1.185 MB / 1.652 GB, free: 4.828 MB / 1.342 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt collapseArrayExpressions (initialization): time 0.001088/1.442, allocations: 276 kB / 1.652 GB, free: 4.559 MB / 1.342 GB Warning: The initial conditions are over specified. The following 8 initial equations are redundant, so they are removed from the initialization_lambda0 system: sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3]) sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3]) sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3]) sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]). Notification: Model statistics after passing the back-end for initialization: * Number of independent subsystems: 384 * Number of states: 0 () * Number of discrete variables: 5 ($PRE.pulse.count,$PRE.pulse.T_start,pulse.count,pulse.T_start,$whenCondition1) * Number of discrete states: 0 () * Number of clocked states: 0 () * Top-level inputs: 0 Notification: Strong component statistics for initialization (635): * Single equations (assignments): 627 * Array equations: 0 * Algorithm blocks: 1 * Record equations: 0 * When equations: 0 * If-equations: 0 * Equation systems (not torn): 0 * Torn equation systems: 7 * Mixed (continuous/discrete) equation systems: 0 Notification: Torn system details for strict tearing set: * Linear torn systems (#iteration vars, #inner vars, density): 7 systems {(1,9,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,9,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%)} * Non-linear torn systems (#iteration vars, #inner vars): 0 systems Notification: Performance of prepare postOptimizeDAE: time 0.001918/1.444, allocations: 0.7532 MB / 1.653 GB, free: 3.789 MB / 1.342 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt lateInlineFunction (simulation): time 0.002333/1.446, allocations: 0.6985 MB / 1.654 GB, free: 3.086 MB / 1.342 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt wrapFunctionCalls (simulation): time 0.008924/1.455, allocations: 5.143 MB / 1.659 GB, free: 13.91 MB / 1.357 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt inlineArrayEqn (simulation): time 2.37e-05/1.455, allocations: 24 kB / 1.659 GB, free: 13.89 MB / 1.357 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt constantLinearSystem (simulation): time 1.049e-05/1.455, allocations: 4 kB / 1.659 GB, free: 13.88 MB / 1.357 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifysemiLinear (simulation): time 0.005659/1.461, allocations: 3.946 MB / 1.662 GB, free: 9.902 MB / 1.357 GB Warning: The model contains alias variables with redundant start and/or conflicting nominal values. It is recommended to resolve the conflicts, because otherwise the system could be hard to solve. To print the conflicting alias sets and the chosen candidates please use -d=aliasConflicts. Notification: Performance of postOpt removeSimpleEquations (simulation): time 0.02498/1.486, allocations: 13.4 MB / 1.676 GB, free: 12.27 MB / 1.373 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyComplexFunction (simulation): time 8.847e-06/1.486, allocations: 0 / 1.676 GB, free: 12.27 MB / 1.373 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt solveSimpleEquations (simulation): time 0.002385/1.488, allocations: 0.6049 MB / 1.676 GB, free: 11.66 MB / 1.373 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt tearingSystem (simulation): time 0.001348/1.489, allocations: 0.5833 MB / 1.677 GB, free: 11.06 MB / 1.373 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt inputDerivativesUsed (simulation): time 0.0002678/1.49, allocations: 131.9 kB / 1.677 GB, free: 10.93 MB / 1.373 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt calculateStrongComponentJacobians (simulation): time 0.01286/1.502, allocations: 14.39 MB / 1.691 GB, free: 11.55 MB / 1.389 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt calculateStateSetsJacobians (simulation): time 5.059e-06/1.502, allocations: 7.969 kB / 1.691 GB, free: 11.54 MB / 1.389 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt symbolicJacobian (simulation): time 0.01133/1.514, allocations: 7.149 MB / 1.698 GB, free: 4.309 MB / 1.389 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt removeConstants (simulation): time 0.004362/1.518, allocations: 1.691 MB / 1.7 GB, free: 2.594 MB / 1.389 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyTimeIndepFuncCalls (simulation): time 0.001236/1.519, allocations: 123.9 kB / 1.7 GB, free: 2.473 MB / 1.389 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyAllExpressions (simulation): time 0.00411/1.523, allocations: 0.6161 MB / 1.7 GB, free: 1.855 MB / 1.389 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt findZeroCrossings (simulation): time 0.0004262/1.524, allocations: 165.7 kB / 1.7 GB, free: 1.691 MB / 1.389 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt collapseArrayExpressions (simulation): time 0.0001949/1.524, allocations: 83.95 kB / 1.701 GB, free: 1.609 MB / 1.389 GB Notification: Performance of sorting global known variables: time 0.01259/1.537, allocations: 7.339 MB / 1.708 GB, free: 10.28 MB / 1.404 GB Notification: Performance of sort global known variables: time 1.3e-07/1.537, allocations: 0 / 1.708 GB, free: 10.28 MB / 1.404 GB Notification: Performance of remove unused functions: time 0.01394/1.551, allocations: 3.968 MB / 1.712 GB, free: 6.312 MB / 1.404 GB Notification: Model statistics after passing the back-end for simulation: * Number of independent subsystems: 12 * Number of states: 43 (sla.vol[1].dynBal.U,sla.vol[2].dynBal.U,sla.vol[3].dynBal.U,sla.vol[4].dynBal.U,sla.vol[5].dynBal.U,sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_b[1].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[2].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[3].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[4].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[5].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T[3],TOut.T) * Number of discrete variables: 3 ($whenCondition1,pulse.T_start,pulse.count) * Number of discrete states: 1 (pulse.count) * Number of clocked states: 0 () * Top-level inputs: 0 Notification: Strong component statistics for simulation (210): * Single equations (assignments): 199 * Array equations: 0 * Algorithm blocks: 0 * Record equations: 2 * When equations: 2 * If-equations: 0 * Equation systems (not torn): 0 * Torn equation systems: 7 * Mixed (continuous/discrete) equation systems: 0 Notification: Torn system details for strict tearing set: * Linear torn systems (#iteration vars, #inner vars, density): 7 systems {(1,9,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,9,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%)} * Non-linear torn systems (#iteration vars, #inner vars): 0 systems Notification: Performance of Backend phase and start with SimCode phase: time 0.01208/1.563, allocations: 8.225 MB / 1.72 GB, free: 14 MB / 1.42 GB Notification: Performance of simCode: created initialization part: time 0.02029/1.583, allocations: 13.1 MB / 1.732 GB, free: 0.7148 MB / 1.42 GB Notification: Performance of simCode: created event and clocks part: time 1.058e-05/1.583, allocations: 4 kB / 1.732 GB, free: 0.7109 MB / 1.42 GB Notification: Performance of simCode: created simulation system equations: time 0.004513/1.588, allocations: 2.977 MB / 1.735 GB, free: 13.64 MB / 1.436 GB Notification: Performance of simCode: created of all other equations (e.g. parameter, nominal, assert, etc): time 0.01365/1.601, allocations: 2.925 MB / 1.738 GB, free: 10.76 MB / 1.436 GB Notification: Performance of simCode: created linear, non-linear and system jacobian parts: time 0.1225/1.724, allocations: 80.13 MB / 1.816 GB, free: 7.227 MB / 1.514 GB Notification: Performance of simCode: some other stuff during SimCode phase: time 0.005923/1.73, allocations: 5.369 MB / 1.822 GB, free: 1.82 MB / 1.514 GB Notification: Performance of simCode: alias equations: time 0.01271/1.742, allocations: 6.423 MB / 1.828 GB, free: 11.4 MB / 1.529 GB Notification: Performance of simCode: all other stuff during SimCode phase: time 0.005104/1.747, allocations: 2.983 MB / 1.831 GB, free: 8.422 MB / 1.529 GB Notification: Performance of SimCode: time 1.021e-06/1.747, allocations: 0 / 1.831 GB, free: 8.422 MB / 1.529 GB Notification: Performance of buildModelFMU: Generate the FMI files: time 0.7788/2.526, allocations: 203 MB / 2.029 GB, free: 399.7 MB / 1.545 GB Notification: Performance of buildModelFMU: Generate platform static: time 23.33/25.86, allocations: 11.94 kB / 2.029 GB, free: 399.7 MB / 1.545 GB " [Timeout remaining time 274] (rm -f Buildings_11_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.pipe ; mkfifo Buildings_11_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.pipe ; head -c 1048576 < Buildings_11_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.pipe >> ../files/Buildings_11_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.sim & python3 -m fmpy simulate --output-file Buildings_11_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU_res.csv --start-time 0 --stop-time 86400 --timeout 400 --relative-tolerance 1e-06 --interface-type ModelExchange --solver CVode --output-interval 34.56 Buildings_11_Buildings_Fluid_HeatExchangers_RadiantSlabs_Examples_StepResponseEpsilonNTU.fmu > Buildings_11_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.pipe 2>&1) [Timeout 420.0] diffSimulationResults("Buildings_11_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU_res.csv","/mnt/ReferenceFiles/Buildings/csv/maint_11.x/Buildings_Fluid_HeatExchangers_RadiantSlabs_Examples_StepResponseEpsilonNTU.csv","/var/lib/jenkins1/ws/OpenModelicaLibraryTestingWork/OpenModelicaLibraryTesting/files/Buildings_11_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.diff",relTol=0.003,relTolDiffMinMax=0.003,rangeDelta=0.001) [Timeout 300] "Error: Could not read variable sla.sta_b.T in file Buildings_11_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU_res.csv. Warning: Get data of variable sla.sta_b.T from file Buildings_11_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU_res.csv failed! Error: Could not read variable sla.surf_a.T in file Buildings_11_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU_res.csv. Warning: Get data of variable sla.surf_a.T from file Buildings_11_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU_res.csv failed! Error: Could not read variable sla.surf_b.T in file Buildings_11_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU_res.csv. Warning: Get data of variable sla.surf_b.T from file Buildings_11_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU_res.csv failed! Error: Could not read variable sla.surf_a.Q_flow in file Buildings_11_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU_res.csv. Warning: Get data of variable sla.surf_a.Q_flow from file Buildings_11_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU_res.csv failed! Error: Could not read variable sla.surf_b.Q_flow in file Buildings_11_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU_res.csv. Warning: Get data of variable sla.surf_b.Q_flow from file Buildings_11_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU_res.csv failed! " [Timeout remaining time 300] Reference file matches [Calling sys.exit(0), Time elapsed: 31.436327729003096]