Running: ./testmodel.py --libraries=/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries --ompython_omhome=/usr Buildings_10_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.conf.json loadFile("/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/ModelicaServices 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo", uses=false) loadFile("/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Complex 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo", uses=false) loadFile("/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Modelica 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo", uses=false) loadFile("/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Buildings 10.1.1-maint.10.0.x/package.mo", uses=false) Using package Buildings with version 10.1.1 (/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Buildings 10.1.1-maint.10.0.x/package.mo) Using package Modelica with version 4.0.0 (/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Modelica 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo) Using package Complex with version 4.0.0 (/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Complex 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo) Using package ModelicaServices with version 4.0.0 (/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/ModelicaServices 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo) Running command: "" <> buildModelFMU(Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU,fileNamePrefix="Buildings_10_Buildings_Fluid_HeatExchangers_RadiantSlabs_Examples_StepResponseEpsilonNTU",fmuType="me",version="2.0",platforms={"static"}) "" <> buildModelFMU(Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU,fileNamePrefix="Buildings_10_Buildings_Fluid_HeatExchangers_RadiantSlabs_Examples_StepResponseEpsilonNTU",fmuType="me",version="2.0",platforms={"static"}) Notification: Performance of loadFile(/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/ModelicaServices 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo): time 0.006987/0.006988, allocations: 104.9 kB / 15.74 MB, free: 6.504 MB / 14.72 MB Notification: Performance of loadFile(/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Complex 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo): time 0.00162/0.001621, allocations: 199.1 kB / 16.68 MB, free: 6.375 MB / 14.72 MB Notification: Performance of loadFile(/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Modelica 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo): time 1.324/1.324, allocations: 222.9 MB / 240.4 MB, free: 4.305 MB / 190.1 MB Notification: Performance of loadFile(/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Buildings 10.1.1-maint.10.0.x/package.mo): time 2.43/2.43, allocations: 437 MB / 0.7105 GB, free: 4.969 MB / 0.5606 GB Notification: Performance of FrontEnd - loaded program: time 0.001309/0.001309, allocations: 63.91 kB / 1.018 GB, free: 15.02 MB / 0.7794 GB Notification: Performance of FrontEnd - Absyn->SCode: time 0.2744/0.2757, allocations: 151.6 MB / 1.166 GB, free: 7.285 MB / 0.92 GB Notification: Performance of NFInst.instantiate(Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU): time 0.03316/0.3089, allocations: 31.77 MB / 1.197 GB, free: 7.391 MB / 0.9512 GB Notification: Performance of NFInst.instExpressions: time 0.01752/0.3265, allocations: 12.28 MB / 1.209 GB, free: 11.07 MB / 0.9669 GB Notification: Performance of NFInst.updateImplicitVariability: time 0.002072/0.3286, allocations: 59.69 kB / 1.209 GB, free: 11.01 MB / 0.9669 GB Notification: Performance of NFTyping.typeComponents: time 0.003276/0.3319, allocations: 1.119 MB / 1.21 GB, free: 9.887 MB / 0.9669 GB Notification: Performance of NFTyping.typeBindings: time 0.005571/0.3375, allocations: 2.158 MB / 1.212 GB, free: 7.723 MB / 0.9669 GB Notification: Performance of NFTyping.typeClassSections: time 0.004972/0.3425, allocations: 1.864 MB / 1.214 GB, free: 5.867 MB / 0.9669 GB Notification: Performance of NFFlatten.flatten: time 0.01992/0.3625, allocations: 19.58 MB / 1.233 GB, free: 2.25 MB / 0.9825 GB Notification: Performance of NFFlatten.resolveConnections: time 0.009541/0.372, allocations: 7.197 MB / 1.24 GB, free: 10.97 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of NFEvalConstants.evaluate: time 0.01151/0.3836, allocations: 6.53 MB / 1.247 GB, free: 4.438 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of NFSimplifyModel.simplify: time 0.6131/0.9967, allocations: 5.353 MB / 1.252 GB, free: 18.89 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of NFPackage.collectConstants: time 0.003001/0.9997, allocations: 0.7489 MB / 1.253 GB, free: 18.89 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of NFFlatten.collectFunctions: time 0.0088/1.009, allocations: 3.213 MB / 1.256 GB, free: 18.89 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of NFScalarize.scalarize: time 0.005503/1.014, allocations: 3 MB / 1.259 GB, free: 18.89 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of NFVerifyModel.verify: time 0.0129/1.027, allocations: 4.748 MB / 1.263 GB, free: 18.45 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of NFConvertDAE.convert: time 0.02519/1.052, allocations: 15.48 MB / 1.279 GB, free: 16.77 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of FrontEnd - DAE generated: time 7.634e-06/1.052, allocations: 0 / 1.279 GB, free: 16.77 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of FrontEnd: time 2.084e-06/1.052, allocations: 0 / 1.279 GB, free: 16.77 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of Transformations before backend: time 0.0004713/1.053, allocations: 1.656 kB / 1.279 GB, free: 16.77 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Model statistics after passing the front-end and creating the data structures used by the back-end: * Number of equations: 866 * Number of variables: 866 Notification: Performance of Generate backend data structure: time 0.03739/1.09, allocations: 11.75 MB / 1.29 GB, free: 12.75 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of prepare preOptimizeDAE: time 4.481e-05/1.09, allocations: 9.969 kB / 1.29 GB, free: 12.75 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt introduceOutputAliases (simulation): time 0.001617/1.092, allocations: 0.4949 MB / 1.291 GB, free: 12.68 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt normalInlineFunction (simulation): time 0.003995/1.096, allocations: 0.9168 MB / 1.291 GB, free: 12.21 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt evaluateParameters (simulation): time 0.02283/1.119, allocations: 9.681 MB / 1.301 GB, free: 10.02 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt simplifyIfEquations (simulation): time 0.0003191/1.119, allocations: 332.3 kB / 1.301 GB, free: 9.863 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt expandDerOperator (simulation): time 0.001992/1.121, allocations: 485.4 kB / 1.302 GB, free: 9.699 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt clockPartitioning (simulation): time 0.01076/1.132, allocations: 5.956 MB / 1.307 GB, free: 7.395 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt findStateOrder (simulation): time 8.904e-05/1.132, allocations: 23.64 kB / 1.308 GB, free: 7.383 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt replaceEdgeChange (simulation): time 0.000443/1.132, allocations: 143.2 kB / 1.308 GB, free: 7.277 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt inlineArrayEqn (simulation): time 0.0001046/1.132, allocations: 93.09 kB / 1.308 GB, free: 7.277 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt removeEqualRHS (simulation): time 0.007669/1.14, allocations: 4.762 MB / 1.312 GB, free: 5.895 MB / 0.9981 GB Warning: The model contains alias variables with redundant start and/or conflicting nominal values. It is recommended to resolve the conflicts, because otherwise the system could be hard to solve. To print the conflicting alias sets and the chosen candidates please use -d=aliasConflicts. Notification: Performance of preOpt removeSimpleEquations (simulation): time 0.06171/1.202, allocations: 33.8 MB / 1.345 GB, free: 13.21 MB / 1.029 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt comSubExp (simulation): time 0.01232/1.214, allocations: 6.234 MB / 1.351 GB, free: 9.891 MB / 1.029 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt resolveLoops (simulation): time 0.004295/1.219, allocations: 2.549 MB / 1.354 GB, free: 8.66 MB / 1.029 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt evalFunc (simulation): time 0.03241/1.251, allocations: 13.24 MB / 1.367 GB, free: 15.23 MB / 1.045 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt encapsulateWhenConditions (simulation): time 0.00556/1.257, allocations: 2.136 MB / 1.369 GB, free: 13.2 MB / 1.045 GB Notification: Performance of pre-optimization done (n=224): time 6.943e-06/1.257, allocations: 0 / 1.369 GB, free: 13.2 MB / 1.045 GB Notification: Performance of matching and sorting (n=232): time 0.03882/1.296, allocations: 14.28 MB / 1.383 GB, free: 14.79 MB / 1.061 GB Notification: Performance of inlineWhenForInitialization (initialization): time 9.029e-05/1.296, allocations: 136.8 kB / 1.383 GB, free: 14.63 MB / 1.061 GB Notification: Performance of selectInitializationVariablesDAE (initialization): time 0.02517/1.321, allocations: 10.43 MB / 1.393 GB, free: 4.207 MB / 1.061 GB Notification: Performance of collectPreVariables (initialization): time 0.001483/1.322, allocations: 117.7 kB / 1.393 GB, free: 4.086 MB / 1.061 GB Notification: Performance of collectInitialEqns (initialization): time 0.006701/1.329, allocations: 3.342 MB / 1.397 GB, free: 0.7539 MB / 1.061 GB Notification: Performance of collectInitialBindings (initialization): time 0.002684/1.332, allocations: 0.9123 MB / 1.398 GB, free: 15.85 MB / 1.076 GB Notification: Performance of simplifyInitialFunctions (initialization): time 0.005783/1.338, allocations: 1.21 MB / 1.399 GB, free: 14.63 MB / 1.076 GB Notification: Performance of setup shared object (initialization): time 0.0001045/1.338, allocations: 308.9 kB / 1.399 GB, free: 14.33 MB / 1.076 GB Notification: Performance of preBalanceInitialSystem (initialization): time 0.006803/1.345, allocations: 3.451 MB / 1.402 GB, free: 10.86 MB / 1.076 GB Notification: Performance of partitionIndependentBlocks (initialization): time 0.008672/1.353, allocations: 5.933 MB / 1.408 GB, free: 3.766 MB / 1.076 GB Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3])) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3])) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3])) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3])) Notification: Performance of analyzeInitialSystem (initialization): time 0.06705/1.42, allocations: 36.64 MB / 1.444 GB, free: 14.03 MB / 1.123 GB Notification: Performance of solveInitialSystemEqSystem (initialization): time 6.886e-05/1.421, allocations: 31.69 kB / 1.444 GB, free: 14 MB / 1.123 GB Notification: Performance of matching and sorting (n=659) (initialization): time 0.02264/1.443, allocations: 10.11 MB / 1.454 GB, free: 4.328 MB / 1.123 GB Notification: Performance of prepare postOptimizeDAE: time 0.0001537/1.443, allocations: 70.64 kB / 1.454 GB, free: 4.254 MB / 1.123 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyComplexFunction (initialization): time 0.0001424/1.444, allocations: 84.91 kB / 1.454 GB, free: 4.172 MB / 1.123 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt tearingSystem (initialization): time 0.001873/1.445, allocations: 0.7145 MB / 1.455 GB, free: 3.441 MB / 1.123 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt solveSimpleEquations (initialization): time 0.006153/1.452, allocations: 1.481 MB / 1.456 GB, free: 2.051 MB / 1.123 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt calculateStrongComponentJacobians (initialization): time 0.01208/1.464, allocations: 14.52 MB / 1.47 GB, free: 2.688 MB / 1.139 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyAllExpressions (initialization): time 0.01099/1.475, allocations: 1.189 MB / 1.471 GB, free: 1.5 MB / 1.139 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt collapseArrayExpressions (initialization): time 0.001577/1.476, allocations: 276 kB / 1.472 GB, free: 1.23 MB / 1.139 GB Warning: The initial conditions are over specified. The following 8 initial equations are redundant, so they are removed from the initialization system: sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3]) sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3]) sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3]) sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]). Notification: Performance of preBalanceInitialSystem (initialization_lambda0): time 0.01452/1.491, allocations: 7.084 MB / 1.479 GB, free: 10.13 MB / 1.154 GB Notification: Performance of partitionIndependentBlocks (initialization_lambda0): time 0.008556/1.499, allocations: 5.933 MB / 1.484 GB, free: 3.039 MB / 1.154 GB Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3])) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3])) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3])) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3])) Notification: Performance of analyzeInitialSystem (initialization_lambda0): time 0.06582/1.565, allocations: 36.56 MB / 1.52 GB, free: 13.38 MB / 1.201 GB Notification: Performance of solveInitialSystemEqSystem (initialization_lambda0): time 6.779e-05/1.565, allocations: 24 kB / 1.52 GB, free: 13.36 MB / 1.201 GB Notification: Performance of matching and sorting (n=659) (initialization_lambda0): time 0.02282/1.588, allocations: 10.11 MB / 1.53 GB, free: 3.684 MB / 1.201 GB Notification: Performance of prepare postOptimizeDAE: time 0.0001352/1.588, allocations: 77.86 kB / 1.53 GB, free: 3.602 MB / 1.201 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyComplexFunction (initialization): time 0.0001472/1.589, allocations: 84 kB / 1.53 GB, free: 3.52 MB / 1.201 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt tearingSystem (initialization): time 0.001847/1.59, allocations: 0.7089 MB / 1.531 GB, free: 2.793 MB / 1.201 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt solveSimpleEquations (initialization): time 0.006235/1.597, allocations: 1.477 MB / 1.532 GB, free: 1.41 MB / 1.201 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt calculateStrongComponentJacobians (initialization): time 0.01234/1.609, allocations: 14.53 MB / 1.547 GB, free: 2.02 MB / 1.217 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyAllExpressions (initialization): time 0.01067/1.62, allocations: 1.174 MB / 1.548 GB, free: 0.8477 MB / 1.217 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt collapseArrayExpressions (initialization): time 0.001573/1.621, allocations: 280 kB / 1.548 GB, free: 0.5742 MB / 1.217 GB Warning: The initial conditions are over specified. The following 8 initial equations are redundant, so they are removed from the initialization_lambda0 system: sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3]) sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3]) sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3]) sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]). Notification: Model statistics after passing the back-end for initialization: * Number of independent subsystems: 384 * Number of states: 0 () * Number of discrete variables: 5 ($PRE.pulse.count,$PRE.pulse.T_start,pulse.count,pulse.T_start,$whenCondition1) * Number of discrete states: 0 () * Number of clocked states: 0 () * Top-level inputs: 0 Notification: Strong component statistics for initialization (635): * Single equations (assignments): 627 * Array equations: 0 * Algorithm blocks: 1 * Record equations: 0 * When equations: 0 * If-equations: 0 * Equation systems (not torn): 0 * Torn equation systems: 7 * Mixed (continuous/discrete) equation systems: 0 Notification: Torn system details for strict tearing set: * Linear torn systems (#iteration vars, #inner vars, density): 7 systems {(1,9,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,9,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%)} * Non-linear torn systems (#iteration vars, #inner vars): 0 systems Notification: Performance of prepare postOptimizeDAE: time 0.002723/1.624, allocations: 0.7732 MB / 1.549 GB, free: 15.9 MB / 1.232 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt lateInlineFunction (simulation): time 0.003004/1.627, allocations: 0.6985 MB / 1.549 GB, free: 15.2 MB / 1.232 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt wrapFunctionCalls (simulation): time 0.01225/1.639, allocations: 5.141 MB / 1.554 GB, free: 10.04 MB / 1.232 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt inlineArrayEqn (simulation): time 3.503e-05/1.639, allocations: 31.94 kB / 1.554 GB, free: 10.01 MB / 1.232 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt constantLinearSystem (simulation): time 2.049e-05/1.64, allocations: 7.938 kB / 1.554 GB, free: 10 MB / 1.232 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifysemiLinear (simulation): time 0.007095/1.647, allocations: 3.961 MB / 1.558 GB, free: 6.02 MB / 1.232 GB Warning: The model contains alias variables with redundant start and/or conflicting nominal values. It is recommended to resolve the conflicts, because otherwise the system could be hard to solve. To print the conflicting alias sets and the chosen candidates please use -d=aliasConflicts. Notification: Performance of postOpt removeSimpleEquations (simulation): time 0.0358/1.682, allocations: 13.41 MB / 1.571 GB, free: 8.469 MB / 1.248 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyComplexFunction (simulation): time 1.595e-05/1.683, allocations: 4 kB / 1.571 GB, free: 8.465 MB / 1.248 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt solveSimpleEquations (simulation): time 0.002889/1.685, allocations: 0.6033 MB / 1.572 GB, free: 7.883 MB / 1.248 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt tearingSystem (simulation): time 0.00165/1.687, allocations: 0.5744 MB / 1.573 GB, free: 7.289 MB / 1.248 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt inputDerivativesUsed (simulation): time 0.0006415/1.688, allocations: 131.9 kB / 1.573 GB, free: 7.16 MB / 1.248 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt calculateStrongComponentJacobians (simulation): time 0.01169/1.699, allocations: 14.41 MB / 1.587 GB, free: 7.848 MB / 1.264 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt calculateStateSetsJacobians (simulation): time 4.979e-06/1.699, allocations: 4 kB / 1.587 GB, free: 7.844 MB / 1.264 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt symbolicJacobian (simulation): time 0.01375/1.713, allocations: 7.161 MB / 1.594 GB, free: 0.6172 MB / 1.264 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt removeConstants (simulation): time 0.006425/1.72, allocations: 1.695 MB / 1.595 GB, free: 14.89 MB / 1.279 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyTimeIndepFuncCalls (simulation): time 0.003191/1.723, allocations: 123.9 kB / 1.596 GB, free: 14.77 MB / 1.279 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyAllExpressions (simulation): time 0.006912/1.73, allocations: 0.6201 MB / 1.596 GB, free: 14.15 MB / 1.279 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt findZeroCrossings (simulation): time 0.0009615/1.731, allocations: 164.9 kB / 1.596 GB, free: 14 MB / 1.279 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt collapseArrayExpressions (simulation): time 0.0006163/1.732, allocations: 87.95 kB / 1.596 GB, free: 13.91 MB / 1.279 GB Notification: Performance of sorting global known variables: time 0.01745/1.749, allocations: 7.335 MB / 1.604 GB, free: 6.59 MB / 1.279 GB Notification: Performance of sort global known variables: time 2.9e-07/1.749, allocations: 0 / 1.604 GB, free: 6.59 MB / 1.279 GB Notification: Performance of remove unused functions: time 0.02316/1.772, allocations: 3.96 MB / 1.607 GB, free: 2.629 MB / 1.279 GB Notification: Model statistics after passing the back-end for simulation: * Number of independent subsystems: 12 * Number of states: 43 (sla.vol[1].dynBal.U,sla.vol[2].dynBal.U,sla.vol[3].dynBal.U,sla.vol[4].dynBal.U,sla.vol[5].dynBal.U,sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_b[1].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[2].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[3].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[4].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[5].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T[3],TOut.T) * Number of discrete variables: 3 ($whenCondition1,pulse.T_start,pulse.count) * Number of discrete states: 1 (pulse.count) * Number of clocked states: 0 () * Top-level inputs: 0 Notification: Strong component statistics for simulation (210): * Single equations (assignments): 199 * Array equations: 0 * Algorithm blocks: 0 * Record equations: 2 * When equations: 2 * If-equations: 0 * Equation systems (not torn): 0 * Torn equation systems: 7 * Mixed (continuous/discrete) equation systems: 0 Notification: Torn system details for strict tearing set: * Linear torn systems (#iteration vars, #inner vars, density): 7 systems {(1,9,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,9,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%)} * Non-linear torn systems (#iteration vars, #inner vars): 0 systems Notification: Performance of Backend phase and start with SimCode phase: time 0.01705/1.789, allocations: 8.233 MB / 1.615 GB, free: 10.39 MB / 1.295 GB Notification: Performance of simCode: created initialization part: time 0.02356/1.813, allocations: 13.44 MB / 1.629 GB, free: 13.26 MB / 1.311 GB Notification: Performance of simCode: created event and clocks part: time 1.115e-05/1.813, allocations: 4 kB / 1.629 GB, free: 13.26 MB / 1.311 GB Notification: Performance of simCode: created simulation system equations: time 0.005337/1.818, allocations: 3.05 MB / 1.632 GB, free: 10.16 MB / 1.311 GB Notification: Performance of simCode: created of all other equations (e.g. parameter, nominal, assert, etc): time 0.01919/1.837, allocations: 2.947 MB / 1.634 GB, free: 7.262 MB / 1.311 GB Notification: Performance of simCode: created linear, non-linear and system jacobian parts: time 0.167/2.005, allocations: 80 MB / 1.713 GB, free: 4.16 MB / 1.389 GB Notification: Performance of simCode: some other stuff during SimCode phase: time 0.009971/2.015, allocations: 5.373 MB / 1.718 GB, free: 14.75 MB / 1.404 GB Notification: Performance of simCode: alias equations: time 0.01705/2.032, allocations: 6.423 MB / 1.724 GB, free: 8.336 MB / 1.404 GB Notification: Performance of simCode: all other stuff during SimCode phase: time 0.008958/2.041, allocations: 2.983 MB / 1.727 GB, free: 5.348 MB / 1.404 GB Notification: Performance of SimCode: time 1.342e-06/2.041, allocations: 4 kB / 1.727 GB, free: 5.344 MB / 1.404 GB Notification: Performance of buildModelFMU: Generate the FMI files: time 0.8382/2.879, allocations: 201.9 MB / 1.924 GB, free: 440.4 MB / 1.467 GB Notification: Performance of buildModelFMU: Generate platform static: time 25.41/28.28, allocations: 15.81 kB / 1.924 GB, free: 440.4 MB / 1.467 GB (rm -f Buildings_10_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.pipe ; mkfifo Buildings_10_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.pipe ; head -c 1048576 < Buildings_10_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.pipe >> ../files/Buildings_10_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.sim & python3 -m fmpy simulate --output-file Buildings_10_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU_res.csv --start-time 0 --stop-time 86400 --timeout 50 --relative-tolerance 1e-06 --interface-type ModelExchange --solver CVode --output-interval 34.56 Buildings_10_Buildings_Fluid_HeatExchangers_RadiantSlabs_Examples_StepResponseEpsilonNTU.fmu > Buildings_10_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.pipe 2>&1) diffSimulationResults("Buildings_10_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU_res.csv","/mnt/ReferenceFiles/Buildings/csv/maint_10.0.x/Buildings_Fluid_HeatExchangers_RadiantSlabs_Examples_StepResponseEpsilonNTU.csv","/var/lib/jenkins1/ws/OpenModelicaLibraryTestingWork/OpenModelicaLibraryTesting/files/Buildings_10_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.diff",relTol=0.003,relTolDiffMinMax=0.003,rangeDelta=0.001) Reference file matches