Running: ./testmodel.py --libraries=/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries --ompython_omhome=/usr Buildings_10_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.conf.json
loadFile("/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/ModelicaServices 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo", uses=false) [Timeout 180]
"Notification: Performance of loadFile(/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/ModelicaServices 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo): time 0.001329/0.001329, allocations: 106.8 kB / 17.54 MB, free: 4.746 MB / 14.72 MB
"
[Timeout remaining time 180]
loadFile("/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Complex 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo", uses=false) [Timeout 180]
"Notification: Performance of loadFile(/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Complex 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo): time 0.001437/0.001437, allocations: 185.9 kB / 20.71 MB, free: 1.586 MB / 14.72 MB
"
[Timeout remaining time 180]
loadFile("/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Modelica 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo", uses=false) [Timeout 180]
"Notification: Performance of loadFile(/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Modelica 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo): time 1.304/1.304, allocations: 225.6 MB / 249.3 MB, free: 3.336 MB / 190.1 MB
"
[Timeout remaining time 179]
loadFile("/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Buildings 10.1.1-maint.10.0.x/package.mo", uses=false) [Timeout 180]
"Notification: Performance of loadFile(/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Buildings 10.1.1-maint.10.0.x/package.mo): time 2.366/2.366, allocations: 443.5 MB / 0.7304 GB, free: 13.93 MB / 0.5762 GB
"
[Timeout remaining time 177]
Using package Buildings with version 10.1.1 (/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Buildings 10.1.1-maint.10.0.x/package.mo)
Using package Modelica with version 4.0.0 (/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Modelica 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo)
Using package Complex with version 4.0.0 (/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Complex 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo)
Using package ModelicaServices with version 4.0.0 (/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/ModelicaServices 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo)
Running command: "" <> buildModelFMU(Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU,fileNamePrefix="Buildings_10_Buildings_Fluid_HeatExchangers_RadiantSlabs_Examples_StepResponseEpsilonNTU",fmuType="me",version="2.0",platforms={"static"})
"" <> buildModelFMU(Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU,fileNamePrefix="Buildings_10_Buildings_Fluid_HeatExchangers_RadiantSlabs_Examples_StepResponseEpsilonNTU",fmuType="me",version="2.0",platforms={"static"}) [Timeout 300]
"Notification: Performance of FrontEnd - loaded program: time 0.001894/0.001894, allocations: 64.03 kB / 1.059 GB, free: 0.9102 MB / 0.795 GB
Notification: Performance of FrontEnd - Absyn->SCode: time 0.2598/0.2617, allocations: 160.7 MB / 1.216 GB, free: 15.88 MB / 0.9669 GB
Notification: Performance of NFInst.instantiate(Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU): time 0.03367/0.2953, allocations: 32.28 MB / 1.247 GB, free: 15.47 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of NFInst.instExpressions: time 0.01745/0.3128, allocations: 12.37 MB / 1.259 GB, free: 3.066 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of NFInst.updateImplicitVariability: time 0.001618/0.3144, allocations: 63.62 kB / 1.259 GB, free: 3.004 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of NFTyping.typeComponents: time 0.002834/0.3172, allocations: 1.131 MB / 1.26 GB, free: 1.867 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of NFTyping.typeBindings: time 0.4964/0.8136, allocations: 2.153 MB / 1.262 GB, free: 9.785 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of NFTyping.typeClassSections: time 0.00391/0.8175, allocations: 1.877 MB / 1.264 GB, free: 9.785 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of NFFlatten.flatten: time 0.01705/0.8346, allocations: 19.61 MB / 1.283 GB, free: 9.719 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of NFFlatten.resolveConnections: time 0.007483/0.8421, allocations: 5.37 MB / 1.289 GB, free: 9.281 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of NFEvalConstants.evaluate: time 0.01177/0.8538, allocations: 6.558 MB / 1.295 GB, free: 7.387 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of NFSimplifyModel.simplify: time 0.01014/0.864, allocations: 5.651 MB / 1.301 GB, free: 5.34 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of NFPackage.collectConstants: time 0.002484/0.8664, allocations: 0.7498 MB / 1.301 GB, free: 5.34 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of NFFlatten.collectFunctions: time 0.008128/0.8746, allocations: 3.239 MB / 1.304 GB, free: 4.688 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of NFScalarize.scalarize: time 0.004103/0.8787, allocations: 3.086 MB / 1.307 GB, free: 3.324 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of NFVerifyModel.verify: time 0.008505/0.8872, allocations: 4.749 MB / 1.312 GB, free: 408 kB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of NFConvertDAE.convert: time 0.01822/0.9054, allocations: 15.49 MB / 1.327 GB, free: 10.04 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of FrontEnd - DAE generated: time 5.531e-06/0.9054, allocations: 0 / 1.327 GB, free: 10.04 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of FrontEnd: time 1.513e-06/0.9054, allocations: 0.9062 kB / 1.327 GB, free: 10.04 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of Transformations before backend: time 0.0002722/0.9057, allocations: 0 / 1.327 GB, free: 10.04 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Model statistics after passing the front-end and creating the data structures used by the back-end:
 * Number of equations: 866
 * Number of variables: 866
Notification: Performance of Generate backend data structure: time 0.02886/0.9345, allocations: 11.76 MB / 1.339 GB, free: 2.691 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of prepare preOptimizeDAE: time 4.072e-05/0.9346, allocations: 12.38 kB / 1.339 GB, free: 2.688 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt introduceOutputAliases (simulation): time 0.001131/0.9357, allocations: 497.2 kB / 1.339 GB, free: 2.34 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt normalInlineFunction (simulation): time 0.003088/0.9388, allocations: 0.9217 MB / 1.34 GB, free: 1.855 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt evaluateParameters (simulation): time 0.01886/0.9577, allocations: 9.68 MB / 1.35 GB, free: 12.14 MB / 1.029 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt simplifyIfEquations (simulation): time 0.0002222/0.9579, allocations: 333.9 kB / 1.35 GB, free: 11.98 MB / 1.029 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt expandDerOperator (simulation): time 0.0009583/0.9588, allocations: 486.4 kB / 1.35 GB, free: 11.82 MB / 1.029 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt clockPartitioning (simulation): time 0.008935/0.9678, allocations: 5.963 MB / 1.356 GB, free: 6.586 MB / 1.029 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt findStateOrder (simulation): time 6.283e-05/0.9678, allocations: 7.938 kB / 1.356 GB, free: 6.578 MB / 1.029 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt replaceEdgeChange (simulation): time 0.0003805/0.9682, allocations: 150.5 kB / 1.356 GB, free: 6.434 MB / 1.029 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt inlineArrayEqn (simulation): time 9.437e-05/0.9683, allocations: 100.5 kB / 1.356 GB, free: 6.336 MB / 1.029 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt removeEqualRHS (simulation): time 0.00737/0.9757, allocations: 4.758 MB / 1.361 GB, free: 1.566 MB / 1.029 GB
Warning: The model contains alias variables with redundant start and/or conflicting nominal values. It is recommended to resolve the conflicts, because otherwise the system could be hard to solve. To print the conflicting alias sets and the chosen candidates please use -d=aliasConflicts.
Notification: Performance of preOpt removeSimpleEquations (simulation): time 0.05272/1.028, allocations: 33.8 MB / 1.394 GB, free: 14.29 MB / 1.076 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt comSubExp (simulation): time 0.01115/1.04, allocations: 6.056 MB / 1.4 GB, free: 8.199 MB / 1.076 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt resolveLoops (simulation): time 0.00384/1.043, allocations: 2.42 MB / 1.402 GB, free: 5.777 MB / 1.076 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt evalFunc (simulation): time 0.02369/1.067, allocations: 13.24 MB / 1.415 GB, free: 8.051 MB / 1.092 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt encapsulateWhenConditions (simulation): time 0.002957/1.07, allocations: 2.134 MB / 1.417 GB, free: 5.898 MB / 1.092 GB
Notification: Performance of pre-optimization done (n=224): time 3.506e-06/1.07, allocations: 0 / 1.417 GB, free: 5.898 MB / 1.092 GB
Notification: Performance of matching and sorting (n=232): time 0.0252/1.095, allocations: 14.29 MB / 1.431 GB, free: 7.453 MB / 1.107 GB
Notification: Performance of inlineWhenForInitialization (initialization): time 8.234e-05/1.095, allocations: 124.8 kB / 1.431 GB, free: 7.305 MB / 1.107 GB
Notification: Performance of selectInitializationVariablesDAE (initialization): time 0.01764/1.113, allocations: 10.43 MB / 1.442 GB, free: 12.88 MB / 1.123 GB
Notification: Performance of collectPreVariables (initialization): time 0.001029/1.114, allocations: 121.7 kB / 1.442 GB, free: 12.76 MB / 1.123 GB
Notification: Performance of collectInitialEqns (initialization): time 0.004113/1.118, allocations: 3.345 MB / 1.445 GB, free: 9.422 MB / 1.123 GB
Notification: Performance of collectInitialBindings (initialization): time 0.001779/1.12, allocations: 0.9144 MB / 1.446 GB, free: 8.52 MB / 1.123 GB
Notification: Performance of simplifyInitialFunctions (initialization): time 0.001909/1.122, allocations: 1.202 MB / 1.447 GB, free: 7.309 MB / 1.123 GB
Notification: Performance of setup shared object (initialization): time 0.0001124/1.122, allocations: 309 kB / 1.447 GB, free: 7.004 MB / 1.123 GB
Notification: Performance of preBalanceInitialSystem (initialization): time 0.00493/1.127, allocations: 3.451 MB / 1.451 GB, free: 3.535 MB / 1.123 GB
Notification: Performance of partitionIndependentBlocks (initialization): time 0.006624/1.133, allocations: 5.938 MB / 1.457 GB, free: 12.4 MB / 1.139 GB
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3]))
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3]))
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3]))
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]))
Notification: Performance of analyzeInitialSystem (initialization): time 0.05577/1.189, allocations: 36.64 MB / 1.492 GB, free: 6.34 MB / 1.17 GB
Notification: Performance of solveInitialSystemEqSystem (initialization): time 6.564e-05/1.189, allocations: 24 kB / 1.492 GB, free: 6.316 MB / 1.17 GB
Notification: Performance of matching and sorting (n=659) (initialization): time 0.0177/1.207, allocations: 10.1 MB / 1.502 GB, free: 12.14 MB / 1.186 GB
Notification: Performance of prepare postOptimizeDAE: time 8.652e-05/1.207, allocations: 77.69 kB / 1.502 GB, free: 12.06 MB / 1.186 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyComplexFunction (initialization): time 9.564e-05/1.207, allocations: 84 kB / 1.502 GB, free: 11.98 MB / 1.186 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt tearingSystem (initialization): time 0.001575/1.209, allocations: 0.7071 MB / 1.503 GB, free: 11.25 MB / 1.186 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt solveSimpleEquations (initialization): time 0.004679/1.213, allocations: 1.478 MB / 1.505 GB, free: 9.77 MB / 1.186 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt calculateStrongComponentJacobians (initialization): time 0.01231/1.226, allocations: 14.52 MB / 1.519 GB, free: 10.3 MB / 1.201 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyAllExpressions (initialization): time 0.01105/1.237, allocations: 1.178 MB / 1.52 GB, free: 9.121 MB / 1.201 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt collapseArrayExpressions (initialization): time 0.0009909/1.238, allocations: 276 kB / 1.52 GB, free: 8.852 MB / 1.201 GB
Warning: The initial conditions are over specified. The following 8 initial equations are redundant, so they are removed from the initialization system:
         sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start
         sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start
         sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start
         sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start
         sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3])
         sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3])
         sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3])
         sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]).
Notification: Performance of preBalanceInitialSystem (initialization_lambda0): time 0.01149/1.249, allocations: 7.089 MB / 1.527 GB, free: 1.75 MB / 1.201 GB
Notification: Performance of partitionIndependentBlocks (initialization_lambda0): time 0.006938/1.256, allocations: 5.93 MB / 1.533 GB, free: 10.62 MB / 1.217 GB
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3]))
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3]))
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3]))
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]))
Notification: Performance of analyzeInitialSystem (initialization_lambda0): time 0.05427/1.31, allocations: 36.57 MB / 1.569 GB, free: 4.629 MB / 1.248 GB
Notification: Performance of solveInitialSystemEqSystem (initialization_lambda0): time 6.349e-05/1.311, allocations: 24 kB / 1.569 GB, free: 4.605 MB / 1.248 GB
Notification: Performance of matching and sorting (n=659) (initialization_lambda0): time 0.02037/1.331, allocations: 10.1 MB / 1.578 GB, free: 10.42 MB / 1.264 GB
Notification: Performance of prepare postOptimizeDAE: time 9.37e-05/1.331, allocations: 69.64 kB / 1.578 GB, free: 10.35 MB / 1.264 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyComplexFunction (initialization): time 0.0001054/1.331, allocations: 88.47 kB / 1.579 GB, free: 10.26 MB / 1.264 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt tearingSystem (initialization): time 0.001586/1.333, allocations: 0.7122 MB / 1.579 GB, free: 9.527 MB / 1.264 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt solveSimpleEquations (initialization): time 0.005242/1.338, allocations: 1.483 MB / 1.581 GB, free: 8.043 MB / 1.264 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt calculateStrongComponentJacobians (initialization): time 0.01236/1.35, allocations: 14.52 MB / 1.595 GB, free: 8.566 MB / 1.279 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyAllExpressions (initialization): time 0.009048/1.359, allocations: 1.182 MB / 1.596 GB, free: 7.383 MB / 1.279 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt collapseArrayExpressions (initialization): time 0.0008851/1.36, allocations: 276 kB / 1.596 GB, free: 7.113 MB / 1.279 GB
Warning: The initial conditions are over specified. The following 8 initial equations are redundant, so they are removed from the initialization_lambda0 system:
         sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start
         sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start
         sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start
         sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start
         sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3])
         sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3])
         sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3])
         sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]).
Notification: Model statistics after passing the back-end for initialization:
 * Number of independent subsystems: 384
 * Number of states: 0 ()
 * Number of discrete variables: 5 ($PRE.pulse.count,$PRE.pulse.T_start,pulse.count,pulse.T_start,$whenCondition1)
 * Number of discrete states: 0 ()
 * Number of clocked states: 0 ()
 * Top-level inputs: 0
Notification: Strong component statistics for initialization (635):
 * Single equations (assignments): 627
 * Array equations: 0
 * Algorithm blocks: 1
 * Record equations: 0
 * When equations: 0
 * If-equations: 0
 * Equation systems (not torn): 0
 * Torn equation systems: 7
 * Mixed (continuous/discrete) equation systems: 0
Notification: Torn system details for strict tearing set:
 * Linear torn systems (#iteration vars, #inner vars, density): 7 systems
   {(1,9,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,9,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%)}
 * Non-linear torn systems (#iteration vars, #inner vars): 0 systems
Notification: Performance of prepare postOptimizeDAE: time 0.001297/1.362, allocations: 0.7743 MB / 1.597 GB, free: 6.336 MB / 1.279 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt lateInlineFunction (simulation): time 0.001574/1.363, allocations: 0.6946 MB / 1.598 GB, free: 5.637 MB / 1.279 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt wrapFunctionCalls (simulation): time 0.008615/1.372, allocations: 5.137 MB / 1.603 GB, free: 476 kB / 1.279 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt inlineArrayEqn (simulation): time 2.556e-05/1.372, allocations: 27.98 kB / 1.603 GB, free: 448 kB / 1.279 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt constantLinearSystem (simulation): time 9.788e-06/1.372, allocations: 8 kB / 1.603 GB, free: 440 kB / 1.279 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifysemiLinear (simulation): time 0.005649/1.377, allocations: 3.946 MB / 1.607 GB, free: 12.45 MB / 1.295 GB
Warning: The model contains alias variables with redundant start and/or conflicting nominal values. It is recommended to resolve the conflicts, because otherwise the system could be hard to solve. To print the conflicting alias sets and the chosen candidates please use -d=aliasConflicts.
Notification: Performance of postOpt removeSimpleEquations (simulation): time 0.02383/1.401, allocations: 13.4 MB / 1.62 GB, free: 14.87 MB / 1.311 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyComplexFunction (simulation): time 9.638e-06/1.401, allocations: 4 kB / 1.62 GB, free: 14.87 MB / 1.311 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt solveSimpleEquations (simulation): time 0.002389/1.404, allocations: 0.6011 MB / 1.62 GB, free: 14.27 MB / 1.311 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt tearingSystem (simulation): time 0.001287/1.405, allocations: 0.5832 MB / 1.621 GB, free: 13.66 MB / 1.311 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt inputDerivativesUsed (simulation): time 0.0002717/1.405, allocations: 135.9 kB / 1.621 GB, free: 13.53 MB / 1.311 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt calculateStrongComponentJacobians (simulation): time 0.01215/1.417, allocations: 14.39 MB / 1.635 GB, free: 14.17 MB / 1.326 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt calculateStateSetsJacobians (simulation): time 7.303e-06/1.417, allocations: 7.938 kB / 1.635 GB, free: 14.16 MB / 1.326 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt symbolicJacobian (simulation): time 0.01129/1.429, allocations: 7.144 MB / 1.642 GB, free: 6.938 MB / 1.326 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt removeConstants (simulation): time 0.004451/1.433, allocations: 1.707 MB / 1.644 GB, free: 5.207 MB / 1.326 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyTimeIndepFuncCalls (simulation): time 0.00108/1.434, allocations: 123.9 kB / 1.644 GB, free: 5.086 MB / 1.326 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyAllExpressions (simulation): time 0.003869/1.438, allocations: 0.6162 MB / 1.644 GB, free: 4.469 MB / 1.326 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt findZeroCrossings (simulation): time 0.0004028/1.438, allocations: 169.7 kB / 1.645 GB, free: 4.301 MB / 1.326 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt collapseArrayExpressions (simulation): time 0.0001898/1.439, allocations: 83.95 kB / 1.645 GB, free: 4.219 MB / 1.326 GB
Notification: Performance of sorting global known variables: time 0.01163/1.45, allocations: 7.331 MB / 1.652 GB, free: 12.9 MB / 1.342 GB
Notification: Performance of sort global known variables: time 1.51e-07/1.45, allocations: 0 / 1.652 GB, free: 12.9 MB / 1.342 GB
Notification: Performance of remove unused functions: time 0.01254/1.463, allocations: 3.964 MB / 1.656 GB, free: 8.934 MB / 1.342 GB
Notification: Model statistics after passing the back-end for simulation:
 * Number of independent subsystems: 12
 * Number of states: 43 (sla.vol[1].dynBal.U,sla.vol[2].dynBal.U,sla.vol[3].dynBal.U,sla.vol[4].dynBal.U,sla.vol[5].dynBal.U,sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_b[1].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[2].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[3].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[4].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[5].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T[3],TOut.T)
 * Number of discrete variables: 3 ($whenCondition1,pulse.T_start,pulse.count)
 * Number of discrete states: 1 (pulse.count)
 * Number of clocked states: 0 ()
 * Top-level inputs: 0
Notification: Strong component statistics for simulation (210):
 * Single equations (assignments): 199
 * Array equations: 0
 * Algorithm blocks: 0
 * Record equations: 2
 * When equations: 2
 * If-equations: 0
 * Equation systems (not torn): 0
 * Torn equation systems: 7
 * Mixed (continuous/discrete) equation systems: 0
Notification: Torn system details for strict tearing set:
 * Linear torn systems (#iteration vars, #inner vars, density): 7 systems
   {(1,9,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,9,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%)}
 * Non-linear torn systems (#iteration vars, #inner vars): 0 systems
Notification: Performance of Backend phase and start with SimCode phase: time 0.01241/1.475, allocations: 8.221 MB / 1.664 GB, free: 0.6562 MB / 1.342 GB
Notification: Performance of simCode: created initialization part: time 0.0206/1.496, allocations: 13.11 MB / 1.677 GB, free: 3.367 MB / 1.357 GB
Notification: Performance of simCode: created event and clocks part: time 7.444e-06/1.496, allocations: 3.938 kB / 1.677 GB, free: 3.363 MB / 1.357 GB
Notification: Performance of simCode: created simulation system equations: time 0.004564/1.5, allocations: 2.973 MB / 1.679 GB, free: 304 kB / 1.357 GB
Notification: Performance of simCode: created of all other equations (e.g. parameter, nominal, assert, etc): time 0.01412/1.514, allocations: 2.934 MB / 1.682 GB, free: 13.41 MB / 1.373 GB
Notification: Performance of simCode: created linear, non-linear and system jacobian parts: time 0.1386/1.653, allocations: 80.13 MB / 1.761 GB, free: 9.93 MB / 1.451 GB
Notification: Performance of simCode: some other stuff during SimCode phase: time 0.007231/1.66, allocations: 5.365 MB / 1.766 GB, free: 4.527 MB / 1.451 GB
Notification: Performance of simCode: alias equations: time 0.0142/1.675, allocations: 6.438 MB / 1.772 GB, free: 14.1 MB / 1.467 GB
Notification: Performance of simCode: all other stuff during SimCode phase: time 0.007063/1.682, allocations: 2.975 MB / 1.775 GB, free: 11.12 MB / 1.467 GB
Notification: Performance of SimCode: time 1.212e-06/1.682, allocations: 0 / 1.775 GB, free: 11.12 MB / 1.467 GB
Notification: Performance of buildModelFMU: Generate the FMI files: time 0.7807/2.462, allocations: 203 MB / 1.973 GB, free: 448.7 MB / 1.514 GB
Notification: Performance of buildModelFMU: Generate platform static: time 23.44/25.9, allocations: 10.73 kB / 1.973 GB, free: 448.7 MB / 1.514 GB
"
[Timeout remaining time 274]
(rm -f Buildings_10_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.pipe ; mkfifo Buildings_10_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.pipe ; head -c 1048576 < Buildings_10_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.pipe >> ../files/Buildings_10_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.sim & python3 -m fmpy simulate  --output-file Buildings_10_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU_res.csv --start-time 0 --stop-time 86400 --timeout 400 --relative-tolerance 1e-06 --interface-type ModelExchange --solver CVode --output-interval 34.56 Buildings_10_Buildings_Fluid_HeatExchangers_RadiantSlabs_Examples_StepResponseEpsilonNTU.fmu > Buildings_10_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.pipe 2>&1) [Timeout 420.0]
diffSimulationResults("Buildings_10_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU_res.csv","/mnt/ReferenceFiles/Buildings/csv/maint_10.0.x/Buildings_Fluid_HeatExchangers_RadiantSlabs_Examples_StepResponseEpsilonNTU.csv","/var/lib/jenkins1/ws/OpenModelicaLibraryTestingWork/OpenModelicaLibraryTesting/files/Buildings_10_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.diff",relTol=0.003,relTolDiffMinMax=0.003,rangeDelta=0.001) [Timeout 300]
"Error: Could not read variable sla.sta_b.T in file Buildings_10_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU_res.csv.
Warning: Get data of variable sla.sta_b.T from file Buildings_10_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU_res.csv failed!
Error: Could not read variable sla.surf_a.T in file Buildings_10_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU_res.csv.
Warning: Get data of variable sla.surf_a.T from file Buildings_10_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU_res.csv failed!
Error: Could not read variable sla.surf_b.T in file Buildings_10_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU_res.csv.
Warning: Get data of variable sla.surf_b.T from file Buildings_10_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU_res.csv failed!
Error: Could not read variable sla.surf_a.Q_flow in file Buildings_10_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU_res.csv.
Warning: Get data of variable sla.surf_a.Q_flow from file Buildings_10_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU_res.csv failed!
Error: Could not read variable sla.surf_b.Q_flow in file Buildings_10_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU_res.csv.
Warning: Get data of variable sla.surf_b.Q_flow from file Buildings_10_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU_res.csv failed!
"
[Timeout remaining time 300]
Reference file matches
[Calling sys.exit(0), Time elapsed: 31.34568210299767]