Running: ./testmodel.py --libraries=/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/ --ompython_omhome=/usr Buildings_8_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.conf.json
loadFile("/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Buildings 8.1.4-maint.8.1.x/package.mo", uses=false)
loadFile("/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Complex 3.2.3+maint.om/package.mo", uses=false)
loadFile("/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Modelica 3.2.3+maint.om/package.mo", uses=false)
loadFile("/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/ModelicaServices 3.2.3+maint.om/package.mo", uses=false)
Using package ModelicaServices with version 3.2.3 (/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/ModelicaServices 3.2.3+maint.om/package.mo)
Using package Modelica with version 3.2.3 (/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Modelica 3.2.3+maint.om/package.mo)
Using package Complex with version 3.2.3 (/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Complex 3.2.3+maint.om/package.mo)
Using package Buildings with version 8.1.4 (/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Buildings 8.1.4-maint.8.1.x/package.mo)
Running command: translateModel(Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU,tolerance=1e-06,outputFormat="empty",numberOfIntervals=5000,variableFilter="",fileNamePrefix="Buildings_8_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU")
translateModel(Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU,tolerance=1e-06,outputFormat="empty",numberOfIntervals=5000,variableFilter="",fileNamePrefix="Buildings_8_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU")
Notification: Performance of loadFile(/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Buildings 8.1.4-maint.8.1.x/package.mo): time 1.861/1.861, allocations: 292.3 MB / 308.1 MB, free: 4.23 MB / 234.7 MB
Notification: Performance of loadFile(/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Complex 3.2.3+maint.om/package.mo): time 0.001366/0.001366, allocations: 184.1 kB / 376.9 MB, free: 1.781 MB / 298.7 MB
Notification: Performance of loadFile(/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Modelica 3.2.3+maint.om/package.mo): time 1.475/1.475, allocations: 205 MB / 0.6353 GB, free: 9.785 MB / 474.7 MB
Notification: Performance of loadFile(/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/ModelicaServices 3.2.3+maint.om/package.mo): time 0.00104/0.00104, allocations: 95.08 kB / 0.748 GB, free: 61.29 MB / 0.5573 GB
Notification: Performance of FrontEnd - loaded program: time 0.001027/0.001027, allocations: 59.91 kB / 0.8704 GB, free: 13.07 MB / 0.6042 GB
Notification: Performance of FrontEnd - Absyn->SCode: time 0.2804/0.2815, allocations: 114.5 MB / 0.9822 GB, free: 10.38 MB / 0.7136 GB
Notification: Performance of NFInst.instantiate(Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU): time 0.03571/0.3172, allocations: 31.55 MB / 1.013 GB, free: 10.71 MB / 0.7448 GB
Notification: Performance of NFInst.instExpressions: time 0.5463/0.8636, allocations: 12.36 MB / 1.025 GB, free: 63.05 MB / 0.7448 GB
Notification: Performance of NFInst.updateImplicitVariability: time 0.002699/0.8663, allocations: 52.47 kB / 1.025 GB, free: 63.05 MB / 0.7448 GB
Notification: Performance of NFTyping.typeComponents: time 0.003055/0.8694, allocations: 0.9651 MB / 1.026 GB, free: 63.04 MB / 0.7448 GB
Notification: Performance of NFTyping.typeBindings: time 0.006016/0.8755, allocations: 1.907 MB / 1.028 GB, free: 63.04 MB / 0.7448 GB
Notification: Performance of NFTyping.typeClassSections: time 0.005628/0.8811, allocations: 1.629 MB / 1.03 GB, free: 62.99 MB / 0.7448 GB
Notification: Performance of NFFlatten.flatten: time 0.03217/0.9133, allocations: 22.46 MB / 1.051 GB, free: 61.96 MB / 0.7448 GB
Notification: Performance of NFFlatten.resolveConnections: time 0.01038/0.9237, allocations: 5.552 MB / 1.057 GB, free: 61.15 MB / 0.7448 GB
Notification: Performance of NFEvalConstants.evaluate: time 0.01268/0.9365, allocations: 5.149 MB / 1.062 GB, free: 60.23 MB / 0.7448 GB
Notification: Performance of NFSimplifyModel.simplify: time 0.01334/0.9499, allocations: 5.041 MB / 1.067 GB, free: 59.14 MB / 0.7448 GB
Notification: Performance of NFPackage.collectConstants: time 0.002253/0.9521, allocations: 317 kB / 1.067 GB, free: 59.14 MB / 0.7448 GB
Notification: Performance of NFFlatten.collectFunctions: time 0.008941/0.9611, allocations: 2.697 MB / 1.07 GB, free: 58.49 MB / 0.7448 GB
Notification: Performance of NFScalarize.scalarize: time 0.003888/0.965, allocations: 2.371 MB / 1.072 GB, free: 57.67 MB / 0.7448 GB
Notification: Performance of NFVerifyModel.verify: time 0.009012/0.974, allocations: 4.018 MB / 1.076 GB, free: 55.32 MB / 0.7448 GB
Notification: Performance of NFConvertDAE.convert: time 0.01793/0.992, allocations: 14.96 MB / 1.091 GB, free: 50.91 MB / 0.7448 GB
Notification: Performance of FrontEnd - DAE generated: time 9.548e-06/0.9921, allocations: 0 / 1.091 GB, free: 50.91 MB / 0.7448 GB
Notification: Performance of FrontEnd: time 2.214e-06/0.9921, allocations: 0.5625 kB / 1.091 GB, free: 50.91 MB / 0.7448 GB
Notification: Performance of Transformations before backend: time 0.0004519/0.9925, allocations: 0 / 1.091 GB, free: 50.91 MB / 0.7448 GB
Notification: Model statistics after passing the front-end and creating the data structures used by the back-end:
 * Number of equations: 866
 * Number of variables: 866
Notification: Performance of Generate backend data structure: time 0.03275/1.025, allocations: 11.46 MB / 1.102 GB, free: 45.77 MB / 0.7448 GB
Notification: Performance of prepare preOptimizeDAE: time 4.659e-05/1.025, allocations: 13.06 kB / 1.102 GB, free: 45.77 MB / 0.7448 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt normalInlineFunction (simulation): time 0.004583/1.03, allocations: 0.8696 MB / 1.103 GB, free: 45.33 MB / 0.7448 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt evaluateParameters (simulation): time 0.02278/1.053, allocations: 9.374 MB / 1.112 GB, free: 41.52 MB / 0.7448 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt simplifyIfEquations (simulation): time 0.0003436/1.053, allocations: 332.7 kB / 1.112 GB, free: 41.37 MB / 0.7448 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt expandDerOperator (simulation): time 0.002023/1.055, allocations: 481.6 kB / 1.113 GB, free: 41.21 MB / 0.7448 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt clockPartitioning (simulation): time 0.01408/1.069, allocations: 5.964 MB / 1.118 GB, free: 38.87 MB / 0.7448 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt findStateOrder (simulation): time 9.361e-05/1.069, allocations: 13.97 kB / 1.118 GB, free: 38.86 MB / 0.7448 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt replaceEdgeChange (simulation): time 0.0004696/1.07, allocations: 145.8 kB / 1.119 GB, free: 38.76 MB / 0.7448 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt inlineArrayEqn (simulation): time 0.0001529/1.07, allocations: 97.08 kB / 1.119 GB, free: 38.75 MB / 0.7448 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt removeEqualRHS (simulation): time 0.01118/1.081, allocations: 4.762 MB / 1.123 GB, free: 37.31 MB / 0.7448 GB
Warning: The model contains alias variables with redundant start and/or conflicting nominal values. It is recommended to resolve the conflicts, because otherwise the system could be hard to solve. To print the conflicting alias sets and the chosen candidates please use -d=aliasConflicts.
Notification: Performance of preOpt removeSimpleEquations (simulation): time 0.0743/1.156, allocations: 33.77 MB / 1.156 GB, free: 16.47 MB / 0.7448 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt comSubExp (simulation): time 0.01213/1.168, allocations: 6.231 MB / 1.162 GB, free: 13.13 MB / 0.7448 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt resolveLoops (simulation): time 0.003691/1.171, allocations: 2.506 MB / 1.165 GB, free: 11.93 MB / 0.7448 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt evalFunc (simulation): time 0.02512/1.197, allocations: 13.2 MB / 1.178 GB, free: 15.22 MB / 0.7605 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt encapsulateWhenConditions (simulation): time 0.003148/1.2, allocations: 2.134 MB / 1.18 GB, free: 13.06 MB / 0.7605 GB
Notification: Performance of pre-optimization done (n=224): time 4.709e-06/1.2, allocations: 0 / 1.18 GB, free: 13.06 MB / 0.7605 GB
Notification: Performance of matching and sorting (n=232): time 0.0372/1.237, allocations: 14 MB / 1.194 GB, free: 14.88 MB / 0.7761 GB
Notification: Performance of inlineWhenForInitialization (initialization): time 0.0001099/1.237, allocations: 137.5 kB / 1.194 GB, free: 14.73 MB / 0.7761 GB
Notification: Performance of selectInitializationVariablesDAE (initialization): time 0.02358/1.261, allocations: 10.32 MB / 1.204 GB, free: 4.41 MB / 0.7761 GB
Notification: Performance of collectPreVariables (initialization): time 0.001262/1.262, allocations: 117.7 kB / 1.204 GB, free: 4.289 MB / 0.7761 GB
Notification: Performance of collectInitialEqns (initialization): time 0.005009/1.267, allocations: 3.292 MB / 1.207 GB, free: 1.004 MB / 0.7761 GB
Notification: Performance of collectInitialBindings (initialization): time 0.002346/1.269, allocations: 0.8681 MB / 1.208 GB, free: 144 kB / 0.7761 GB
Notification: Performance of simplifyInitialFunctions (initialization): time 0.002495/1.272, allocations: 1.213 MB / 1.209 GB, free: 14.92 MB / 0.7917 GB
Notification: Performance of setup shared object (initialization): time 9.579e-05/1.272, allocations: 305.1 kB / 1.209 GB, free: 14.62 MB / 0.7917 GB
Notification: Performance of preBalanceInitialSystem (initialization): time 0.005333/1.277, allocations: 3.456 MB / 1.213 GB, free: 11.15 MB / 0.7917 GB
Notification: Performance of partitionIndependentBlocks (initialization): time 0.007465/1.285, allocations: 5.93 MB / 1.219 GB, free: 4.02 MB / 0.7917 GB
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3]))
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3]))
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3]))
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]))
Notification: Performance of analyzeInitialSystem (initialization): time 0.06247/1.347, allocations: 36.64 MB / 1.254 GB, free: 13.94 MB / 0.8386 GB
Notification: Performance of solveInitialSystemEqSystem (initialization): time 8.104e-05/1.348, allocations: 24 kB / 1.254 GB, free: 13.91 MB / 0.8386 GB
Notification: Performance of matching and sorting (n=659) (initialization): time 0.02303/1.371, allocations: 10.08 MB / 1.264 GB, free: 3.746 MB / 0.8386 GB
Notification: Performance of prepare postOptimizeDAE: time 0.0002177/1.371, allocations: 66.73 kB / 1.264 GB, free: 3.676 MB / 0.8386 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyComplexFunction (initialization): time 0.0002498/1.371, allocations: 84 kB / 1.264 GB, free: 3.594 MB / 0.8386 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt tearingSystem (initialization): time 0.002705/1.374, allocations: 0.7092 MB / 1.265 GB, free: 2.863 MB / 0.8386 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt solveSimpleEquations (initialization): time 0.007443/1.381, allocations: 1.478 MB / 1.266 GB, free: 1.383 MB / 0.8386 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt calculateStrongComponentJacobians (initialization): time 0.01285/1.394, allocations: 13.42 MB / 1.28 GB, free: 3.062 MB / 0.8542 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyAllExpressions (initialization): time 0.01143/1.406, allocations: 1.306 MB / 1.281 GB, free: 1.754 MB / 0.8542 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt collapseArrayExpressions (initialization): time 0.001615/1.407, allocations: 272 kB / 1.281 GB, free: 1.488 MB / 0.8542 GB
Warning: The initial conditions are over specified. The following 8 initial equations are redundant, so they are removed from the initialization system:
         sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start
         sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start
         sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start
         sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start
         sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3])
         sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3])
         sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3])
         sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]).
Notification: Performance of preBalanceInitialSystem (initialization_lambda0): time 0.01661/1.424, allocations: 7.072 MB / 1.288 GB, free: 10.4 MB / 0.8698 GB
Notification: Performance of partitionIndependentBlocks (initialization_lambda0): time 0.009606/1.434, allocations: 5.933 MB / 1.294 GB, free: 3.266 MB / 0.8698 GB
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3]))
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3]))
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3]))
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]))
Notification: Performance of analyzeInitialSystem (initialization_lambda0): time 0.06812/1.502, allocations: 36.57 MB / 1.33 GB, free: 13.24 MB / 0.9167 GB
Notification: Performance of solveInitialSystemEqSystem (initialization_lambda0): time 0.0001011/1.502, allocations: 24 kB / 1.33 GB, free: 13.22 MB / 0.9167 GB
Notification: Performance of matching and sorting (n=659) (initialization_lambda0): time 0.02425/1.526, allocations: 10.06 MB / 1.339 GB, free: 3.07 MB / 0.9167 GB
Notification: Performance of prepare postOptimizeDAE: time 0.0001517/1.527, allocations: 78.47 kB / 1.339 GB, free: 2.988 MB / 0.9167 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyComplexFunction (initialization): time 0.00018/1.527, allocations: 88.16 kB / 1.34 GB, free: 2.902 MB / 0.9167 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt tearingSystem (initialization): time 0.002051/1.529, allocations: 0.7133 MB / 1.34 GB, free: 2.168 MB / 0.9167 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt solveSimpleEquations (initialization): time 0.00611/1.535, allocations: 1.47 MB / 1.342 GB, free: 0.6953 MB / 0.9167 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt calculateStrongComponentJacobians (initialization): time 0.01176/1.547, allocations: 13.41 MB / 1.355 GB, free: 2.379 MB / 0.9323 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyAllExpressions (initialization): time 0.01094/1.558, allocations: 1.303 MB / 1.356 GB, free: 1.074 MB / 0.9323 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt collapseArrayExpressions (initialization): time 0.001468/1.559, allocations: 276 kB / 1.356 GB, free: 0.8047 MB / 0.9323 GB
Warning: The initial conditions are over specified. The following 8 initial equations are redundant, so they are removed from the initialization_lambda0 system:
         sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start
         sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start
         sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start
         sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start
         sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3])
         sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3])
         sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3])
         sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]).
Notification: Model statistics after passing the back-end for initialization:
 * Number of independent subsystems: 384
 * Number of states: 0 ()
 * Number of discrete variables: 5 ($PRE.pulse.count,$PRE.pulse.T_start,pulse.count,pulse.T_start,$whenCondition1)
 * Number of discrete states: 0 ()
 * Number of clocked states: 0 ()
 * Top-level inputs: 0
Notification: Strong component statistics for initialization (635):
 * Single equations (assignments): 627
 * Array equations: 0
 * Algorithm blocks: 1
 * Record equations: 0
 * When equations: 0
 * If-equations: 0
 * Equation systems (not torn): 0
 * Torn equation systems: 7
 * Mixed (continuous/discrete) equation systems: 0
Notification: Torn system details for strict tearing set:
 * Linear torn systems (#iteration vars, #inner vars, density): 7 systems
   {(1,9,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,9,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%)}
 * Non-linear torn systems (#iteration vars, #inner vars): 0 systems
Notification: Performance of prepare postOptimizeDAE: time 0.002633/1.562, allocations: 0.7564 MB / 1.357 GB, free: 44 kB / 0.9323 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt lateInlineFunction (simulation): time 0.00301/1.565, allocations: 0.6574 MB / 1.358 GB, free: 15.38 MB / 0.948 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt wrapFunctionCalls (simulation): time 0.01167/1.577, allocations: 5.141 MB / 1.363 GB, free: 10.2 MB / 0.948 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt inlineArrayEqn (simulation): time 3.422e-05/1.577, allocations: 31.97 kB / 1.363 GB, free: 10.17 MB / 0.948 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt constantLinearSystem (simulation): time 1.297e-05/1.577, allocations: 5.75 kB / 1.363 GB, free: 10.16 MB / 0.948 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifysemiLinear (simulation): time 0.005858/1.582, allocations: 3.97 MB / 1.367 GB, free: 6.16 MB / 0.948 GB
Warning: The model contains alias variables with redundant start and/or conflicting nominal values. It is recommended to resolve the conflicts, because otherwise the system could be hard to solve. To print the conflicting alias sets and the chosen candidates please use -d=aliasConflicts.
Notification: Performance of postOpt removeSimpleEquations (simulation): time 0.03241/1.615, allocations: 13.37 MB / 1.38 GB, free: 8.613 MB / 0.9636 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyComplexFunction (simulation): time 1.429e-05/1.615, allocations: 4 kB / 1.38 GB, free: 8.609 MB / 0.9636 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt solveSimpleEquations (simulation): time 0.002585/1.618, allocations: 0.597 MB / 1.38 GB, free: 8.012 MB / 0.9636 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt tearingSystem (simulation): time 0.001755/1.619, allocations: 0.5756 MB / 1.381 GB, free: 7.414 MB / 0.9636 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt inputDerivativesUsed (simulation): time 0.000369/1.62, allocations: 135.9 kB / 1.381 GB, free: 7.281 MB / 0.9636 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt calculateStrongComponentJacobians (simulation): time 0.5981/2.218, allocations: 13.28 MB / 1.394 GB, free: 291.1 MB / 0.9636 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt calculateStateSetsJacobians (simulation): time 5.5e-06/2.218, allocations: 10.42 kB / 1.394 GB, free: 291.1 MB / 0.9636 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt symbolicJacobian (simulation): time 0.1102/2.328, allocations: 58.57 MB / 1.451 GB, free: 267.5 MB / 0.9636 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt removeConstants (simulation): time 0.005623/2.334, allocations: 1.658 MB / 1.453 GB, free: 266.7 MB / 0.9636 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyTimeIndepFuncCalls (simulation): time 0.002162/2.336, allocations: 120.2 kB / 1.453 GB, free: 266.6 MB / 0.9636 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyAllExpressions (simulation): time 0.005644/2.342, allocations: 0.7028 MB / 1.454 GB, free: 266.6 MB / 0.9636 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt findZeroCrossings (simulation): time 0.0004814/2.342, allocations: 160.9 kB / 1.454 GB, free: 266.6 MB / 0.9636 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt collapseArrayExpressions (simulation): time 0.0002331/2.342, allocations: 88 kB / 1.454 GB, free: 266.6 MB / 0.9636 GB
Notification: Performance of sorting global known variables: time 0.0154/2.358, allocations: 7.261 MB / 1.461 GB, free: 264.4 MB / 0.9636 GB
Notification: Performance of sort global known variables: time 8.12e-07/2.358, allocations: 0 / 1.461 GB, free: 264.4 MB / 0.9636 GB
Notification: Performance of remove unused functions: time 0.03096/2.389, allocations: 6.41 MB / 1.467 GB, free: 264.1 MB / 0.9636 GB
Notification: Model statistics after passing the back-end for simulation:
 * Number of independent subsystems: 12
 * Number of states: 43 (sla.vol[1].dynBal.U,sla.vol[2].dynBal.U,sla.vol[3].dynBal.U,sla.vol[4].dynBal.U,sla.vol[5].dynBal.U,sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_b[1].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[2].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[3].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[4].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[5].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T[3],TOut.T)
 * Number of discrete variables: 3 ($whenCondition1,pulse.T_start,pulse.count)
 * Number of discrete states: 1 (pulse.count)
 * Number of clocked states: 0 ()
 * Top-level inputs: 0
Notification: Strong component statistics for simulation (210):
 * Single equations (assignments): 199
 * Array equations: 0
 * Algorithm blocks: 0
 * Record equations: 2
 * When equations: 2
 * If-equations: 0
 * Equation systems (not torn): 0
 * Torn equation systems: 7
 * Mixed (continuous/discrete) equation systems: 0
Notification: Torn system details for strict tearing set:
 * Linear torn systems (#iteration vars, #inner vars, density): 7 systems
   {(1,9,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,9,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%)}
 * Non-linear torn systems (#iteration vars, #inner vars): 0 systems
Notification: Performance of Backend phase and start with SimCode phase: time 0.003631/2.392, allocations: 0.7356 MB / 1.468 GB, free: 264 MB / 0.9636 GB
Notification: Performance of simCode: created initialization part: time 0.02554/2.418, allocations: 13.4 MB / 1.481 GB, free: 259.6 MB / 0.9636 GB
Notification: Performance of simCode: created event and clocks part: time 1.209e-05/2.418, allocations: 1.375 kB / 1.481 GB, free: 259.6 MB / 0.9636 GB
Notification: Performance of simCode: created simulation system equations: time 0.005861/2.424, allocations: 3.056 MB / 1.484 GB, free: 258.1 MB / 0.9636 GB
Notification: Performance of simCode: created of all other equations (e.g. parameter, nominal, assert, etc): time 0.02147/2.445, allocations: 2.78 MB / 1.487 GB, free: 257.5 MB / 0.9636 GB
Notification: Performance of simCode: created linear, non-linear and system jacobian parts: time 0.04939/2.495, allocations: 23.79 MB / 1.51 GB, free: 245.5 MB / 0.9636 GB
Notification: Performance of simCode: some other stuff during SimCode phase: time 0.009488/2.504, allocations: 5.433 MB / 1.515 GB, free: 243.7 MB / 0.9636 GB
Notification: Performance of simCode: alias equations: time 0.01699/2.521, allocations: 6.473 MB / 1.521 GB, free: 241.7 MB / 0.9636 GB
Notification: Performance of simCode: all other stuff during SimCode phase: time 0.003784/2.525, allocations: 444.5 kB / 1.522 GB, free: 241.2 MB / 0.9636 GB
Notification: Performance of SimCode: time 1.232e-06/2.525, allocations: 4 kB / 1.522 GB, free: 241.2 MB / 0.9636 GB
Notification: Performance of Templates: time 0.2184/2.744, allocations: 158 MB / 1.676 GB, free: 84.01 MB / 0.9636 GB
make -j1 -f Buildings_8_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.makefile
(rm -f Buildings_8_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.pipe ; mkfifo Buildings_8_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.pipe ; head -c 1048576 < Buildings_8_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.pipe >> ../files/Buildings_8_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.sim & ./Buildings_8_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU  -abortSlowSimulation -alarm=480 -lv LOG_STATS > Buildings_8_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.pipe 2>&1)