Running: ./testmodel.py --libraries=/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries --ompython_omhome=/usr Buildings_latest_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.conf.json loadFile("/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/ModelicaServices 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo", uses=false) loadFile("/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Complex 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo", uses=false) loadFile("/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Modelica 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo", uses=false) loadFile("/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Buildings 11.0.0-master/package.mo", uses=false) Using package Buildings with version 11.0.0 (/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Buildings 11.0.0-master/package.mo) Using package Modelica with version 4.0.0 (/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Modelica 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo) Using package Complex with version 4.0.0 (/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Complex 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo) Using package ModelicaServices with version 4.0.0 (/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/ModelicaServices 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo) Running command: translateModel(Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU,tolerance=1e-06,outputFormat="mat",numberOfIntervals=5000,variableFilter="time|sla.sta_b.T|sla.surf_a.T|sla.surf_b.T|sla.surf_a.Q_flow|sla.surf_b.Q_flow",fileNamePrefix="Buildings_latest_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU") translateModel(Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU,tolerance=1e-06,outputFormat="mat",numberOfIntervals=5000,variableFilter="time|sla.sta_b.T|sla.surf_a.T|sla.surf_b.T|sla.surf_a.Q_flow|sla.surf_b.Q_flow",fileNamePrefix="Buildings_latest_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU") Notification: Performance of loadFile(/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/ModelicaServices 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo): time 0.0011/0.0011, allocations: 102.6 kB / 16.35 MB, free: 5.879 MB / 14.72 MB Notification: Performance of loadFile(/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Complex 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo): time 0.001134/0.001134, allocations: 192.4 kB / 17.29 MB, free: 5.52 MB / 14.72 MB Notification: Performance of loadFile(/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Modelica 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo): time 1.309/1.309, allocations: 222.9 MB / 241 MB, free: 4.207 MB / 190.1 MB Notification: Performance of loadFile(/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Buildings 11.0.0-master/package.mo): time 2.576/2.576, allocations: 442.6 MB / 0.7165 GB, free: 15.58 MB / 0.5762 GB Notification: Performance of FrontEnd - loaded program: time 0.001213/0.001213, allocations: 69.27 kB / 0.8773 GB, free: 42.1 MB / 0.7169 GB Notification: Performance of FrontEnd - Absyn->SCode: time 0.2521/0.2534, allocations: 153 MB / 1.027 GB, free: 7.57 MB / 0.7794 GB Notification: Performance of NFInst.instantiate(Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU): time 0.02979/0.2832, allocations: 31.77 MB / 1.058 GB, free: 7.68 MB / 0.8106 GB Notification: Performance of NFInst.instExpressions: time 0.01678/0.3, allocations: 12.27 MB / 1.07 GB, free: 11.36 MB / 0.8262 GB Notification: Performance of NFInst.updateImplicitVariability: time 0.002267/0.3023, allocations: 63.62 kB / 1.07 GB, free: 11.3 MB / 0.8262 GB Notification: Performance of NFTyping.typeComponents: time 0.003251/0.3056, allocations: 1.096 MB / 1.071 GB, free: 10.2 MB / 0.8262 GB Notification: Performance of NFTyping.typeBindings: time 0.005393/0.311, allocations: 2.083 MB / 1.073 GB, free: 8.105 MB / 0.8262 GB Notification: Performance of NFTyping.typeClassSections: time 0.006013/0.317, allocations: 1.877 MB / 1.075 GB, free: 6.234 MB / 0.8262 GB Notification: Performance of NFFlatten.flatten: time 0.01975/0.3368, allocations: 19.55 MB / 1.094 GB, free: 2.652 MB / 0.8419 GB Notification: Performance of NFFlatten.resolveConnections: time 0.01018/0.347, allocations: 7.204 MB / 1.101 GB, free: 11.37 MB / 0.8575 GB Notification: Performance of NFEvalConstants.evaluate: time 0.0118/0.3589, allocations: 6.459 MB / 1.107 GB, free: 4.91 MB / 0.8575 GB Notification: Performance of NFSimplifyModel.simplify: time 0.009619/0.3685, allocations: 5.348 MB / 1.112 GB, free: 15.54 MB / 0.8731 GB Notification: Performance of NFPackage.collectConstants: time 0.002176/0.3707, allocations: 0.75 MB / 1.113 GB, free: 14.79 MB / 0.8731 GB Notification: Performance of NFFlatten.collectFunctions: time 0.007464/0.3782, allocations: 3.219 MB / 1.116 GB, free: 11.57 MB / 0.8731 GB Notification: Performance of NFScalarize.scalarize: time 0.004227/0.3825, allocations: 2.996 MB / 1.119 GB, free: 8.566 MB / 0.8731 GB Notification: Performance of NFVerifyModel.verify: time 0.00892/0.3914, allocations: 4.745 MB / 1.124 GB, free: 3.801 MB / 0.8731 GB Notification: Performance of NFConvertDAE.convert: time 0.01718/0.4086, allocations: 15.43 MB / 1.139 GB, free: 4.332 MB / 0.8887 GB Notification: Performance of FrontEnd - DAE generated: time 7.694e-06/0.4087, allocations: 8 kB / 1.139 GB, free: 4.324 MB / 0.8887 GB Notification: Performance of FrontEnd: time 2.034e-06/0.4087, allocations: 0 / 1.139 GB, free: 4.324 MB / 0.8887 GB Notification: Performance of Transformations before backend: time 0.0003785/0.4091, allocations: 0 / 1.139 GB, free: 4.324 MB / 0.8887 GB Notification: Model statistics after passing the front-end and creating the data structures used by the back-end: * Number of equations: 866 * Number of variables: 866 Notification: Performance of Generate backend data structure: time 0.02908/0.4381, allocations: 11.49 MB / 1.15 GB, free: 8.727 MB / 0.9044 GB Notification: Performance of prepare preOptimizeDAE: time 4.24e-05/0.4382, allocations: 15.98 kB / 1.15 GB, free: 8.711 MB / 0.9044 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt normalInlineFunction (simulation): time 0.003632/0.4418, allocations: 0.8848 MB / 1.151 GB, free: 7.816 MB / 0.9044 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt evaluateParameters (simulation): time 0.01906/0.4609, allocations: 9.61 MB / 1.16 GB, free: 14.12 MB / 0.92 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt simplifyIfEquations (simulation): time 0.0002569/0.4612, allocations: 334.8 kB / 1.161 GB, free: 13.8 MB / 0.92 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt expandDerOperator (simulation): time 0.001311/0.4625, allocations: 491.5 kB / 1.161 GB, free: 13.32 MB / 0.92 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt clockPartitioning (simulation): time 0.009075/0.4716, allocations: 5.952 MB / 1.167 GB, free: 7.129 MB / 0.92 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt findStateOrder (simulation): time 7.135e-05/0.4717, allocations: 11.88 kB / 1.167 GB, free: 7.117 MB / 0.92 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt replaceEdgeChange (simulation): time 0.0003788/0.4721, allocations: 156 kB / 1.167 GB, free: 6.965 MB / 0.92 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt inlineArrayEqn (simulation): time 9.001e-05/0.4722, allocations: 99.98 kB / 1.167 GB, free: 6.867 MB / 0.92 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt removeEqualRHS (simulation): time 0.00728/0.4795, allocations: 4.758 MB / 1.172 GB, free: 2.098 MB / 0.92 GB Warning: The model contains alias variables with redundant start and/or conflicting nominal values. It is recommended to resolve the conflicts, because otherwise the system could be hard to solve. To print the conflicting alias sets and the chosen candidates please use -d=aliasConflicts. Notification: Performance of preOpt removeSimpleEquations (simulation): time 0.0526/0.5321, allocations: 33.77 MB / 1.205 GB, free: 14.68 MB / 0.9669 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt comSubExp (simulation): time 0.01128/0.5434, allocations: 6.226 MB / 1.211 GB, free: 8.352 MB / 0.9669 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt resolveLoops (simulation): time 0.003601/0.5471, allocations: 2.502 MB / 1.213 GB, free: 5.844 MB / 0.9669 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt evalFunc (simulation): time 0.02294/0.57, allocations: 13.23 MB / 1.226 GB, free: 8.066 MB / 0.9825 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt encapsulateWhenConditions (simulation): time 0.002966/0.573, allocations: 2.141 MB / 1.228 GB, free: 5.902 MB / 0.9825 GB Notification: Performance of pre-optimization done (n=224): time 4.097e-06/0.5731, allocations: 0 / 1.228 GB, free: 5.902 MB / 0.9825 GB Notification: Performance of matching and sorting (n=232): time 0.02979/0.6029, allocations: 14.02 MB / 1.242 GB, free: 7.699 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of inlineWhenForInitialization (initialization): time 7.386e-05/0.603, allocations: 132.8 kB / 1.242 GB, free: 7.547 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of selectInitializationVariablesDAE (initialization): time 0.5177/1.121, allocations: 10.42 MB / 1.252 GB, free: 196.7 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of collectPreVariables (initialization): time 0.0009144/1.122, allocations: 115.4 kB / 1.253 GB, free: 196.7 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of collectInitialEqns (initialization): time 0.004555/1.126, allocations: 3.301 MB / 1.256 GB, free: 196.1 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of collectInitialBindings (initialization): time 0.00178/1.128, allocations: 0.8701 MB / 1.257 GB, free: 195.9 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of simplifyInitialFunctions (initialization): time 0.002418/1.13, allocations: 1.208 MB / 1.258 GB, free: 195.4 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of setup shared object (initialization): time 4.344e-05/1.131, allocations: 306.9 kB / 1.258 GB, free: 195.1 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of preBalanceInitialSystem (initialization): time 0.006067/1.137, allocations: 3.451 MB / 1.261 GB, free: 194.2 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of partitionIndependentBlocks (initialization): time 0.008483/1.145, allocations: 5.933 MB / 1.267 GB, free: 190.1 MB / 0.9981 GB Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3])) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3])) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3])) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3])) Notification: Performance of analyzeInitialSystem (initialization): time 0.05508/1.2, allocations: 36.64 MB / 1.303 GB, free: 173.7 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of solveInitialSystemEqSystem (initialization): time 0.0001621/1.2, allocations: 27.34 kB / 1.303 GB, free: 173.7 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of matching and sorting (n=659) (initialization): time 0.01626/1.217, allocations: 10.08 MB / 1.313 GB, free: 163.9 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of prepare postOptimizeDAE: time 0.0001323/1.217, allocations: 69.64 kB / 1.313 GB, free: 163.9 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyComplexFunction (initialization): time 0.0001256/1.217, allocations: 84 kB / 1.313 GB, free: 163.8 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt tearingSystem (initialization): time 0.001446/1.218, allocations: 0.7128 MB / 1.314 GB, free: 163.1 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt solveSimpleEquations (initialization): time 0.00515/1.224, allocations: 1.482 MB / 1.315 GB, free: 161.6 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt calculateStrongComponentJacobians (initialization): time 0.008628/1.232, allocations: 14.5 MB / 1.329 GB, free: 146.1 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyAllExpressions (initialization): time 0.008503/1.241, allocations: 1.184 MB / 1.33 GB, free: 144.9 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt collapseArrayExpressions (initialization): time 0.001067/1.242, allocations: 280 kB / 1.331 GB, free: 144.7 MB / 0.9981 GB Warning: The initial conditions are over specified. The following 8 initial equations are redundant, so they are removed from the initialization system: sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3]) sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3]) sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3]) sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]). Notification: Performance of preBalanceInitialSystem (initialization_lambda0): time 0.009243/1.251, allocations: 7.079 MB / 1.338 GB, free: 137.6 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of partitionIndependentBlocks (initialization_lambda0): time 0.005716/1.257, allocations: 5.936 MB / 1.343 GB, free: 130.4 MB / 0.9981 GB Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3])) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3])) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3])) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3])) Notification: Performance of analyzeInitialSystem (initialization_lambda0): time 0.04883/1.306, allocations: 36.57 MB / 1.379 GB, free: 92.42 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of solveInitialSystemEqSystem (initialization_lambda0): time 6.242e-05/1.306, allocations: 26.62 kB / 1.379 GB, free: 92.4 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of matching and sorting (n=659) (initialization_lambda0): time 0.01625/1.322, allocations: 10.07 MB / 1.389 GB, free: 82.24 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of prepare postOptimizeDAE: time 9.007e-05/1.322, allocations: 71.42 kB / 1.389 GB, free: 82.16 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyComplexFunction (initialization): time 0.0001127/1.322, allocations: 84.91 kB / 1.389 GB, free: 82.08 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt tearingSystem (initialization): time 0.001388/1.324, allocations: 0.7126 MB / 1.39 GB, free: 81.35 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt solveSimpleEquations (initialization): time 0.004993/1.329, allocations: 1.482 MB / 1.391 GB, free: 79.86 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt calculateStrongComponentJacobians (initialization): time 0.008737/1.338, allocations: 14.52 MB / 1.405 GB, free: 64.39 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyAllExpressions (initialization): time 0.008921/1.346, allocations: 1.178 MB / 1.407 GB, free: 63.21 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt collapseArrayExpressions (initialization): time 0.001184/1.348, allocations: 272 kB / 1.407 GB, free: 62.95 MB / 0.9981 GB Warning: The initial conditions are over specified. The following 8 initial equations are redundant, so they are removed from the initialization_lambda0 system: sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3]) sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3]) sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3]) sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]). Notification: Model statistics after passing the back-end for initialization: * Number of independent subsystems: 384 * Number of states: 0 () * Number of discrete variables: 5 ($PRE.pulse.count,$PRE.pulse.T_start,pulse.count,pulse.T_start,$whenCondition1) * Number of discrete states: 0 () * Number of clocked states: 0 () * Top-level inputs: 0 Notification: Strong component statistics for initialization (635): * Single equations (assignments): 627 * Array equations: 0 * Algorithm blocks: 1 * Record equations: 0 * When equations: 0 * If-equations: 0 * Equation systems (not torn): 0 * Torn equation systems: 7 * Mixed (continuous/discrete) equation systems: 0 Notification: Torn system details for strict tearing set: * Linear torn systems (#iteration vars, #inner vars, density): 7 systems {(1,9,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,9,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%)} * Non-linear torn systems (#iteration vars, #inner vars): 0 systems Notification: Performance of prepare postOptimizeDAE: time 0.002142/1.35, allocations: 0.7749 MB / 1.408 GB, free: 62.16 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt lateInlineFunction (simulation): time 0.002229/1.352, allocations: 0.6671 MB / 1.408 GB, free: 61.49 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt wrapFunctionCalls (simulation): time 0.008537/1.361, allocations: 5.14 MB / 1.413 GB, free: 56.32 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt inlineArrayEqn (simulation): time 2.389e-05/1.361, allocations: 20 kB / 1.413 GB, free: 56.3 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt constantLinearSystem (simulation): time 1.883e-05/1.361, allocations: 8 kB / 1.413 GB, free: 56.29 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifysemiLinear (simulation): time 0.004903/1.366, allocations: 3.962 MB / 1.417 GB, free: 52.29 MB / 0.9981 GB Warning: The model contains alias variables with redundant start and/or conflicting nominal values. It is recommended to resolve the conflicts, because otherwise the system could be hard to solve. To print the conflicting alias sets and the chosen candidates please use -d=aliasConflicts. Notification: Performance of postOpt removeSimpleEquations (simulation): time 0.02565/1.391, allocations: 13.42 MB / 1.43 GB, free: 38.7 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyComplexFunction (simulation): time 1.156e-05/1.391, allocations: 0 / 1.43 GB, free: 38.7 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt solveSimpleEquations (simulation): time 0.002496/1.394, allocations: 0.6007 MB / 1.431 GB, free: 38.1 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt tearingSystem (simulation): time 0.001298/1.395, allocations: 0.5757 MB / 1.431 GB, free: 37.5 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt inputDerivativesUsed (simulation): time 0.0003982/1.396, allocations: 135.9 kB / 1.432 GB, free: 37.37 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt calculateStrongComponentJacobians (simulation): time 0.008431/1.404, allocations: 14.39 MB / 1.446 GB, free: 22.02 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt calculateStateSetsJacobians (simulation): time 4.749e-06/1.404, allocations: 12 kB / 1.446 GB, free: 22.01 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt symbolicJacobian (simulation): time 0.01041/1.414, allocations: 7.114 MB / 1.453 GB, free: 14.8 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt removeConstants (simulation): time 0.007859/1.422, allocations: 1.672 MB / 1.454 GB, free: 13.1 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyTimeIndepFuncCalls (simulation): time 0.003474/1.426, allocations: 127.9 kB / 1.454 GB, free: 12.98 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyAllExpressions (simulation): time 0.00578/1.432, allocations: 0.6083 MB / 1.455 GB, free: 12.37 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt findZeroCrossings (simulation): time 0.0007632/1.433, allocations: 165.7 kB / 1.455 GB, free: 12.2 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt collapseArrayExpressions (simulation): time 0.000472/1.433, allocations: 85.48 kB / 1.455 GB, free: 12.12 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of sorting global known variables: time 0.01315/1.446, allocations: 7.335 MB / 1.462 GB, free: 4.797 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of sort global known variables: time 3.11e-07/1.446, allocations: 0 / 1.462 GB, free: 4.797 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of remove unused functions: time 0.01624/1.462, allocations: 3.96 MB / 1.466 GB, free: 0.8633 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Model statistics after passing the back-end for simulation: * Number of independent subsystems: 12 * Number of states: 43 (sla.vol[1].dynBal.U,sla.vol[2].dynBal.U,sla.vol[3].dynBal.U,sla.vol[4].dynBal.U,sla.vol[5].dynBal.U,sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_b[1].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[2].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[3].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[4].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[5].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T[3],TOut.T) * Number of discrete variables: 3 ($whenCondition1,pulse.T_start,pulse.count) * Number of discrete states: 1 (pulse.count) * Number of clocked states: 0 () * Top-level inputs: 0 Notification: Strong component statistics for simulation (210): * Single equations (assignments): 199 * Array equations: 0 * Algorithm blocks: 0 * Record equations: 2 * When equations: 2 * If-equations: 0 * Equation systems (not torn): 0 * Torn equation systems: 7 * Mixed (continuous/discrete) equation systems: 0 Notification: Torn system details for strict tearing set: * Linear torn systems (#iteration vars, #inner vars, density): 7 systems {(1,9,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,9,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%)} * Non-linear torn systems (#iteration vars, #inner vars): 0 systems Notification: Performance of Backend phase and start with SimCode phase: time 0.002201/1.465, allocations: 0.5902 MB / 1.467 GB, free: 352 kB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of simCode: created initialization part: time 0.02473/1.489, allocations: 13.44 MB / 1.48 GB, free: 2.73 MB / 1.014 GB Notification: Performance of simCode: created event and clocks part: time 1.166e-05/1.489, allocations: 0 / 1.48 GB, free: 2.73 MB / 1.014 GB Notification: Performance of simCode: created simulation system equations: time 0.005225/1.495, allocations: 3.054 MB / 1.483 GB, free: 15.59 MB / 1.029 GB Notification: Performance of simCode: created of all other equations (e.g. parameter, nominal, assert, etc): time 0.01814/1.513, allocations: 2.938 MB / 1.486 GB, free: 12.71 MB / 1.029 GB Notification: Performance of simCode: created linear, non-linear and system jacobian parts: time 0.03459/1.548, allocations: 18.77 MB / 1.504 GB, free: 9.938 MB / 1.045 GB Notification: Performance of simCode: some other stuff during SimCode phase: time 0.008203/1.556, allocations: 5.369 MB / 1.509 GB, free: 4.531 MB / 1.045 GB Notification: Performance of simCode: alias equations: time 0.01474/1.571, allocations: 6.426 MB / 1.516 GB, free: 14.11 MB / 1.061 GB Notification: Performance of simCode: all other stuff during SimCode phase: time 0.003343/1.574, allocations: 431.3 kB / 1.516 GB, free: 13.69 MB / 1.061 GB Notification: Performance of SimCode: time 9.92e-07/1.574, allocations: 0 / 1.516 GB, free: 13.69 MB / 1.061 GB Notification: Performance of Templates: time 0.2013/1.775, allocations: 136 MB / 1.649 GB, free: 7.008 MB / 1.186 GB make -j1 -f Buildings_latest_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.makefile (rm -f Buildings_latest_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.pipe ; mkfifo Buildings_latest_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.pipe ; head -c 1048576 < Buildings_latest_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.pipe >> ../files/Buildings_latest_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.sim & ./Buildings_latest_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU -abortSlowSimulation -alarm=480 -s gbode -emit_protected -lv LOG_STATS > Buildings_latest_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.pipe 2>&1) diffSimulationResults("Buildings_latest_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU_res.mat","/mnt/ReferenceFiles/Buildings/csv/master/Buildings_Fluid_HeatExchangers_RadiantSlabs_Examples_StepResponseEpsilonNTU.csv","/var/lib/jenkins1/ws/OpenModelicaLibraryTestingWork/OpenModelicaLibraryTesting/files/Buildings_latest_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.diff",relTol=0.003,relTolDiffMinMax=0.003,rangeDelta=0.001) Reference file matches