Running: ./testmodel.py --libraries=/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/ --ompython_omhome=/usr Buildings_8_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.conf.json
loadFile("/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/ModelicaServices 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo", uses=false)
loadFile("/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Complex 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo", uses=false)
loadFile("/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Modelica 3.2.3+maint.om/package.mo", uses=false)
loadFile("/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Buildings 8.1.4-maint.8.1.x/package.mo", uses=false)
Using package Buildings with version 8.1.4 (/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Buildings 8.1.4-maint.8.1.x/package.mo)
Using package Modelica with version 3.2.3 (/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Modelica 3.2.3+maint.om/package.mo)
Using package Complex with version 4.0.0 (/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Complex 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo)
Using package ModelicaServices with version 4.0.0 (/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/ModelicaServices 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo)
Running command: translateModel(Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU,tolerance=1e-06,outputFormat="empty",numberOfIntervals=5000,variableFilter="",fileNamePrefix="Buildings_8_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU")
translateModel(Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU,tolerance=1e-06,outputFormat="empty",numberOfIntervals=5000,variableFilter="",fileNamePrefix="Buildings_8_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU")
Notification: Performance of loadFile(/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/ModelicaServices 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo): time 0.001445/0.001445, allocations: 102.6 kB / 16.36 MB, free: 6.414 MB / 14.72 MB
Notification: Performance of loadFile(/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Complex 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo): time 0.001264/0.001264, allocations: 189.7 kB / 17.3 MB, free: 5.793 MB / 14.72 MB
Notification: Performance of loadFile(/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Modelica 3.2.3+maint.om/package.mo): time 1.432/1.432, allocations: 205.1 MB / 223.2 MB, free: 12.27 MB / 190.1 MB
Notification: Performance of loadFile(/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Buildings 8.1.4-maint.8.1.x/package.mo): time 1.764/1.764, allocations: 292.3 MB / 0.5496 GB, free: 17.5 MB / 462.1 MB
Notification: Modelica requested package Complex of version 3.2.3. Complex 4.0.0 is used instead which states that it is fully compatible without conversion script needed.
Notification: Modelica requested package ModelicaServices of version 3.2.3. ModelicaServices 4.0.0 is used instead which states that it is fully compatible without conversion script needed.
Notification: Performance of FrontEnd - loaded program: time 0.001438/0.001439, allocations: 67.91 kB / 0.6729 GB, free: 5.852 MB / 0.545 GB
Notification: Performance of FrontEnd - Absyn->SCode: time 0.2362/0.2376, allocations: 114.5 MB / 0.7848 GB, free: 3.188 MB / 0.6544 GB
Notification: Performance of NFInst.instantiate(Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU): time 0.3941/0.6318, allocations: 31.74 MB / 0.8158 GB, free: 29.95 MB / 0.6544 GB
Notification: Performance of NFInst.instExpressions: time 0.0162/0.648, allocations: 12.22 MB / 0.8277 GB, free: 21.34 MB / 0.6544 GB
Notification: Performance of NFInst.updateImplicitVariability: time 0.002451/0.6505, allocations: 59.94 kB / 0.8278 GB, free: 21.32 MB / 0.6544 GB
Notification: Performance of NFTyping.typeComponents: time 0.003171/0.6537, allocations: 1.098 MB / 0.8288 GB, free: 20.73 MB / 0.6544 GB
Notification: Performance of NFTyping.typeBindings: time 0.006208/0.66, allocations: 2.066 MB / 0.8309 GB, free: 19.53 MB / 0.6544 GB
Notification: Performance of NFTyping.typeClassSections: time 0.005294/0.6653, allocations: 1.855 MB / 0.8327 GB, free: 18.61 MB / 0.6544 GB
Notification: Performance of NFFlatten.flatten: time 0.02229/0.6876, allocations: 19.48 MB / 0.8517 GB, free: 10.46 MB / 0.6544 GB
Notification: Performance of NFFlatten.resolveConnections: time 0.01027/0.6979, allocations: 7.191 MB / 0.8587 GB, free: 7.301 MB / 0.6544 GB
Notification: Performance of NFEvalConstants.evaluate: time 0.01245/0.7104, allocations: 6.468 MB / 0.865 GB, free: 4.023 MB / 0.6544 GB
Notification: Performance of NFSimplifyModel.simplify: time 0.009975/0.7204, allocations: 5.337 MB / 0.8702 GB, free: 0.8164 MB / 0.6544 GB
Notification: Performance of NFPackage.collectConstants: time 0.002806/0.7233, allocations: 0.7548 MB / 0.871 GB, free: 0.8125 MB / 0.6544 GB
Notification: Performance of NFFlatten.collectFunctions: time 0.009583/0.7329, allocations: 3.216 MB / 0.8741 GB, free: 15.07 MB / 0.67 GB
Notification: Performance of NFScalarize.scalarize: time 0.005678/0.7386, allocations: 3.007 MB / 0.8771 GB, free: 12.06 MB / 0.67 GB
Notification: Performance of NFVerifyModel.verify: time 0.01029/0.7489, allocations: 4.733 MB / 0.8817 GB, free: 7.305 MB / 0.67 GB
Notification: Performance of NFConvertDAE.convert: time 0.02416/0.7731, allocations: 15.41 MB / 0.8967 GB, free: 7.855 MB / 0.6856 GB
Notification: Performance of FrontEnd - DAE generated: time 7.394e-06/0.7732, allocations: 0 / 0.8967 GB, free: 7.855 MB / 0.6856 GB
Notification: Performance of FrontEnd: time 1.653e-06/0.7732, allocations: 4 kB / 0.8967 GB, free: 7.852 MB / 0.6856 GB
Notification: Performance of Transformations before backend: time 0.0004537/0.7736, allocations: 0 / 0.8967 GB, free: 7.852 MB / 0.6856 GB
Notification: Model statistics after passing the front-end and creating the data structures used by the back-end:
 * Number of equations: 866
 * Number of variables: 866
Notification: Performance of Generate backend data structure: time 0.03406/0.8077, allocations: 11.47 MB / 0.9079 GB, free: 12.27 MB / 0.7012 GB
Notification: Performance of prepare preOptimizeDAE: time 4.605e-05/0.8078, allocations: 8.031 kB / 0.9079 GB, free: 12.26 MB / 0.7012 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt normalInlineFunction (simulation): time 0.00444/0.8122, allocations: 0.8725 MB / 0.9088 GB, free: 11.38 MB / 0.7012 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt evaluateParameters (simulation): time 0.02431/0.8366, allocations: 9.332 MB / 0.9179 GB, free: 1.969 MB / 0.7012 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt simplifyIfEquations (simulation): time 0.0003614/0.837, allocations: 333 kB / 0.9182 GB, free: 1.645 MB / 0.7012 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt expandDerOperator (simulation): time 0.001734/0.8387, allocations: 487.7 kB / 0.9187 GB, free: 1.168 MB / 0.7012 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt clockPartitioning (simulation): time 0.01102/0.8497, allocations: 5.961 MB / 0.9245 GB, free: 10.97 MB / 0.7169 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt findStateOrder (simulation): time 8.229e-05/0.8499, allocations: 11.88 kB / 0.9245 GB, free: 10.96 MB / 0.7169 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt replaceEdgeChange (simulation): time 0.0004325/0.8503, allocations: 147.9 kB / 0.9247 GB, free: 10.81 MB / 0.7169 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt inlineArrayEqn (simulation): time 0.0001037/0.8504, allocations: 99.98 kB / 0.9248 GB, free: 10.71 MB / 0.7169 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt removeEqualRHS (simulation): time 0.008359/0.8588, allocations: 4.758 MB / 0.9294 GB, free: 5.945 MB / 0.7169 GB
Warning: The model contains alias variables with redundant start and/or conflicting nominal values. It is recommended to resolve the conflicts, because otherwise the system could be hard to solve. To print the conflicting alias sets and the chosen candidates please use -d=aliasConflicts.
Notification: Performance of preOpt removeSimpleEquations (simulation): time 0.06446/0.9233, allocations: 33.75 MB / 0.9624 GB, free: 2.547 MB / 0.7481 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt comSubExp (simulation): time 0.01248/0.9358, allocations: 6.227 MB / 0.9684 GB, free: 12.22 MB / 0.7637 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt resolveLoops (simulation): time 0.004408/0.9403, allocations: 2.499 MB / 0.9709 GB, free: 9.719 MB / 0.7637 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt evalFunc (simulation): time 0.03262/0.9729, allocations: 13.23 MB / 0.9838 GB, free: 11.94 MB / 0.7794 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt encapsulateWhenConditions (simulation): time 0.004528/0.9775, allocations: 2.134 MB / 0.9859 GB, free: 9.781 MB / 0.7794 GB
Notification: Performance of pre-optimization done (n=224): time 8.827e-06/0.9776, allocations: 4 kB / 0.9859 GB, free: 9.777 MB / 0.7794 GB
Notification: Performance of matching and sorting (n=232): time 0.0388/1.016, allocations: 14 MB / 0.9996 GB, free: 11.59 MB / 0.795 GB
Notification: Performance of inlineWhenForInitialization (initialization): time 0.0001064/1.017, allocations: 136.8 kB / 0.9997 GB, free: 11.43 MB / 0.795 GB
Notification: Performance of selectInitializationVariablesDAE (initialization): time 0.02614/1.043, allocations: 10.39 MB / 1.01 GB, free: 1.047 MB / 0.795 GB
Notification: Performance of collectPreVariables (initialization): time 0.001176/1.044, allocations: 117.7 kB / 1.01 GB, free: 0.9258 MB / 0.795 GB
Notification: Performance of collectInitialEqns (initialization): time 0.006099/1.05, allocations: 3.293 MB / 1.013 GB, free: 13.61 MB / 0.8106 GB
Notification: Performance of collectInitialBindings (initialization): time 0.002263/1.052, allocations: 0.8668 MB / 1.014 GB, free: 12.73 MB / 0.8106 GB
Notification: Performance of simplifyInitialFunctions (initialization): time 0.004246/1.057, allocations: 1.214 MB / 1.015 GB, free: 11.51 MB / 0.8106 GB
Notification: Performance of setup shared object (initialization): time 9.993e-05/1.057, allocations: 305.1 kB / 1.015 GB, free: 11.21 MB / 0.8106 GB
Notification: Performance of preBalanceInitialSystem (initialization): time 0.005975/1.063, allocations: 3.447 MB / 1.019 GB, free: 7.742 MB / 0.8106 GB
Notification: Performance of partitionIndependentBlocks (initialization): time 0.00822/1.071, allocations: 5.932 MB / 1.025 GB, free: 0.6055 MB / 0.8106 GB
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3]))
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3]))
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3]))
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]))
Notification: Performance of analyzeInitialSystem (initialization): time 0.06712/1.138, allocations: 36.64 MB / 1.06 GB, free: 10.52 MB / 0.8575 GB
Notification: Performance of solveInitialSystemEqSystem (initialization): time 0.0001002/1.138, allocations: 24 kB / 1.06 GB, free: 10.49 MB / 0.8575 GB
Notification: Performance of matching and sorting (n=659) (initialization): time 0.0218/1.16, allocations: 10.07 MB / 1.07 GB, free: 348 kB / 0.8575 GB
Notification: Performance of prepare postOptimizeDAE: time 0.0001615/1.16, allocations: 75.45 kB / 1.07 GB, free: 268 kB / 0.8575 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyComplexFunction (initialization): time 0.000182/1.16, allocations: 86.59 kB / 1.07 GB, free: 184 kB / 0.8575 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt tearingSystem (initialization): time 0.001877/1.162, allocations: 0.7161 MB / 1.071 GB, free: 15.44 MB / 0.8731 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt solveSimpleEquations (initialization): time 0.006156/1.168, allocations: 1.474 MB / 1.073 GB, free: 13.96 MB / 0.8731 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt calculateStrongComponentJacobians (initialization): time 0.01304/1.182, allocations: 14.52 MB / 1.087 GB, free: 14.48 MB / 0.8887 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyAllExpressions (initialization): time 0.009689/1.191, allocations: 1.178 MB / 1.088 GB, free: 13.3 MB / 0.8887 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt collapseArrayExpressions (initialization): time 0.001421/1.193, allocations: 280 kB / 1.088 GB, free: 13.03 MB / 0.8887 GB
Warning: The initial conditions are over specified. The following 8 initial equations are redundant, so they are removed from the initialization system:
         sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start
         sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start
         sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start
         sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start
         sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3])
         sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3])
         sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3])
         sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]).
Notification: Performance of preBalanceInitialSystem (initialization_lambda0): time 0.01254/1.205, allocations: 7.075 MB / 1.095 GB, free: 5.941 MB / 0.8887 GB
Notification: Performance of partitionIndependentBlocks (initialization_lambda0): time 0.008114/1.213, allocations: 5.932 MB / 1.101 GB, free: 14.8 MB / 0.9044 GB
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3]))
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3]))
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3]))
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]))
Notification: Performance of analyzeInitialSystem (initialization_lambda0): time 0.5261/1.74, allocations: 36.57 MB / 1.137 GB, free: 269.7 MB / 0.92 GB
Notification: Performance of solveInitialSystemEqSystem (initialization_lambda0): time 6.375e-05/1.74, allocations: 23.25 kB / 1.137 GB, free: 269.7 MB / 0.92 GB
Notification: Performance of matching and sorting (n=659) (initialization_lambda0): time 0.02258/1.762, allocations: 10.07 MB / 1.146 GB, free: 269.5 MB / 0.92 GB
Notification: Performance of prepare postOptimizeDAE: time 9.4e-05/1.762, allocations: 68.97 kB / 1.147 GB, free: 269.4 MB / 0.92 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyComplexFunction (initialization): time 0.0001899/1.763, allocations: 83.31 kB / 1.147 GB, free: 269.4 MB / 0.92 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt tearingSystem (initialization): time 0.001742/1.764, allocations: 0.7129 MB / 1.147 GB, free: 269.3 MB / 0.92 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt solveSimpleEquations (initialization): time 0.006003/1.77, allocations: 1.476 MB / 1.149 GB, free: 269.1 MB / 0.92 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt calculateStrongComponentJacobians (initialization): time 0.01179/1.782, allocations: 14.51 MB / 1.163 GB, free: 257.7 MB / 0.92 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyAllExpressions (initialization): time 0.0119/1.794, allocations: 1.179 MB / 1.164 GB, free: 257.6 MB / 0.92 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt collapseArrayExpressions (initialization): time 0.001536/1.796, allocations: 277.8 kB / 1.164 GB, free: 257.6 MB / 0.92 GB
Warning: The initial conditions are over specified. The following 8 initial equations are redundant, so they are removed from the initialization_lambda0 system:
         sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start
         sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start
         sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start
         sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start
         sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3])
         sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3])
         sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3])
         sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]).
Notification: Model statistics after passing the back-end for initialization:
 * Number of independent subsystems: 384
 * Number of states: 0 ()
 * Number of discrete variables: 5 ($PRE.pulse.count,$PRE.pulse.T_start,pulse.count,pulse.T_start,$whenCondition1)
 * Number of discrete states: 0 ()
 * Number of clocked states: 0 ()
 * Top-level inputs: 0
Notification: Strong component statistics for initialization (635):
 * Single equations (assignments): 627
 * Array equations: 0
 * Algorithm blocks: 1
 * Record equations: 0
 * When equations: 0
 * If-equations: 0
 * Equation systems (not torn): 0
 * Torn equation systems: 7
 * Mixed (continuous/discrete) equation systems: 0
Notification: Torn system details for strict tearing set:
 * Linear torn systems (#iteration vars, #inner vars, density): 7 systems
   {(1,9,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,9,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%)}
 * Non-linear torn systems (#iteration vars, #inner vars): 0 systems
Notification: Performance of prepare postOptimizeDAE: time 0.001914/1.798, allocations: 0.7606 MB / 1.165 GB, free: 257.2 MB / 0.92 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt lateInlineFunction (simulation): time 0.002635/1.8, allocations: 0.6578 MB / 1.166 GB, free: 257.2 MB / 0.92 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt wrapFunctionCalls (simulation): time 0.01003/1.81, allocations: 5.142 MB / 1.171 GB, free: 255.5 MB / 0.92 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt inlineArrayEqn (simulation): time 3.318e-05/1.81, allocations: 26.25 kB / 1.171 GB, free: 255.5 MB / 0.92 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt constantLinearSystem (simulation): time 1.63e-05/1.81, allocations: 13.55 kB / 1.171 GB, free: 255.5 MB / 0.92 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifysemiLinear (simulation): time 0.006249/1.817, allocations: 3.958 MB / 1.175 GB, free: 254.3 MB / 0.92 GB
Warning: The model contains alias variables with redundant start and/or conflicting nominal values. It is recommended to resolve the conflicts, because otherwise the system could be hard to solve. To print the conflicting alias sets and the chosen candidates please use -d=aliasConflicts.
Notification: Performance of postOpt removeSimpleEquations (simulation): time 0.03648/1.853, allocations: 13.41 MB / 1.188 GB, free: 249.4 MB / 0.92 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyComplexFunction (simulation): time 1.722e-05/1.853, allocations: 2.656 kB / 1.188 GB, free: 249.4 MB / 0.92 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt solveSimpleEquations (simulation): time 0.002957/1.856, allocations: 0.6021 MB / 1.188 GB, free: 249.3 MB / 0.92 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt tearingSystem (simulation): time 0.00183/1.858, allocations: 0.5815 MB / 1.189 GB, free: 249.2 MB / 0.92 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt inputDerivativesUsed (simulation): time 0.0006394/1.859, allocations: 135.4 kB / 1.189 GB, free: 249.1 MB / 0.92 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt calculateStrongComponentJacobians (simulation): time 0.01027/1.869, allocations: 14.39 MB / 1.203 GB, free: 237.7 MB / 0.92 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt calculateStateSetsJacobians (simulation): time 5.239e-06/1.869, allocations: 3.5 kB / 1.203 GB, free: 237.7 MB / 0.92 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt symbolicJacobian (simulation): time 0.01216/1.881, allocations: 7.127 MB / 1.21 GB, free: 235 MB / 0.92 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt removeConstants (simulation): time 0.005934/1.887, allocations: 1.663 MB / 1.212 GB, free: 234 MB / 0.92 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyTimeIndepFuncCalls (simulation): time 0.003009/1.89, allocations: 128.5 kB / 1.212 GB, free: 234 MB / 0.92 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyAllExpressions (simulation): time 0.007133/1.897, allocations: 0.6077 MB / 1.212 GB, free: 233.7 MB / 0.92 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt findZeroCrossings (simulation): time 0.001074/1.899, allocations: 173.3 kB / 1.213 GB, free: 233.6 MB / 0.92 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt collapseArrayExpressions (simulation): time 0.0005854/1.899, allocations: 81.52 kB / 1.213 GB, free: 233.5 MB / 0.92 GB
Notification: Performance of sorting global known variables: time 0.01698/1.916, allocations: 7.312 MB / 1.22 GB, free: 229.8 MB / 0.92 GB
Notification: Performance of sort global known variables: time 5.91e-07/1.916, allocations: 0 / 1.22 GB, free: 229.8 MB / 0.92 GB
Notification: Performance of remove unused functions: time 0.01983/1.936, allocations: 3.961 MB / 1.224 GB, free: 229.6 MB / 0.92 GB
Notification: Model statistics after passing the back-end for simulation:
 * Number of independent subsystems: 12
 * Number of states: 43 (sla.vol[1].dynBal.U,sla.vol[2].dynBal.U,sla.vol[3].dynBal.U,sla.vol[4].dynBal.U,sla.vol[5].dynBal.U,sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_b[1].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[2].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[3].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[4].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[5].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T[3],TOut.T)
 * Number of discrete variables: 3 ($whenCondition1,pulse.T_start,pulse.count)
 * Number of discrete states: 1 (pulse.count)
 * Number of clocked states: 0 ()
 * Top-level inputs: 0
Notification: Strong component statistics for simulation (210):
 * Single equations (assignments): 199
 * Array equations: 0
 * Algorithm blocks: 0
 * Record equations: 2
 * When equations: 2
 * If-equations: 0
 * Equation systems (not torn): 0
 * Torn equation systems: 7
 * Mixed (continuous/discrete) equation systems: 0
Notification: Torn system details for strict tearing set:
 * Linear torn systems (#iteration vars, #inner vars, density): 7 systems
   {(1,9,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,9,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%)}
 * Non-linear torn systems (#iteration vars, #inner vars): 0 systems
Notification: Performance of Backend phase and start with SimCode phase: time 0.002586/1.939, allocations: 0.5943 MB / 1.224 GB, free: 229.4 MB / 0.92 GB
Notification: Performance of simCode: created initialization part: time 0.02135/1.96, allocations: 13.43 MB / 1.237 GB, free: 218.9 MB / 0.92 GB
Notification: Performance of simCode: created event and clocks part: time 1.603e-05/1.96, allocations: 0 / 1.237 GB, free: 218.9 MB / 0.92 GB
Notification: Performance of simCode: created simulation system equations: time 0.004887/1.965, allocations: 3.051 MB / 1.24 GB, free: 215.8 MB / 0.92 GB
Notification: Performance of simCode: created of all other equations (e.g. parameter, nominal, assert, etc): time 0.02064/1.986, allocations: 2.945 MB / 1.243 GB, free: 213.1 MB / 0.92 GB
Notification: Performance of simCode: created linear, non-linear and system jacobian parts: time 0.03546/2.021, allocations: 18.73 MB / 1.261 GB, free: 194.4 MB / 0.92 GB
Notification: Performance of simCode: some other stuff during SimCode phase: time 0.006274/2.028, allocations: 5.361 MB / 1.267 GB, free: 189 MB / 0.92 GB
Notification: Performance of simCode: alias equations: time 0.01369/2.041, allocations: 6.444 MB / 1.273 GB, free: 182.5 MB / 0.92 GB
Notification: Performance of simCode: all other stuff during SimCode phase: time 0.00269/2.044, allocations: 435.3 kB / 1.273 GB, free: 182.1 MB / 0.92 GB
Notification: Performance of SimCode: time 1.222e-06/2.044, allocations: 3.938 kB / 1.273 GB, free: 182.1 MB / 0.92 GB
Notification: Performance of Templates: time 0.1723/2.216, allocations: 135.9 MB / 1.406 GB, free: 47.69 MB / 0.92 GB
make -j1 -f Buildings_8_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.makefile
(rm -f Buildings_8_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.pipe ; mkfifo Buildings_8_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.pipe ; head -c 1048576 < Buildings_8_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.pipe >> ../files/Buildings_8_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.sim & ./Buildings_8_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU  -abortSlowSimulation -alarm=480 -s gbode -lv LOG_STATS > Buildings_8_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.pipe 2>&1)