Running: ./testmodel.py --libraries=/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries --ompython_omhome=/usr Buildings_10_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference.conf.json loadFile("/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/ModelicaServices 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo", uses=false) loadFile("/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Complex 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo", uses=false) loadFile("/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Modelica 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo", uses=false) loadFile("/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Buildings 10.1.0-maint.10.0.x/package.mo", uses=false) Using package Buildings with version 10.1.0 (/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Buildings 10.1.0-maint.10.0.x/package.mo) Using package Modelica with version 4.0.0 (/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Modelica 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo) Using package Complex with version 4.0.0 (/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Complex 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo) Using package ModelicaServices with version 4.0.0 (/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/ModelicaServices 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo) Running command: translateModel(Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference,tolerance=1e-06,outputFormat="mat",numberOfIntervals=5000,variableFilter="time|sla.sta_b.T|sla.surf_a.T|sla.surf_b.T|sla.surf_a.Q_flow|sla.surf_b.Q_flow",fileNamePrefix="Buildings_10_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference") translateModel(Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference,tolerance=1e-06,outputFormat="mat",numberOfIntervals=5000,variableFilter="time|sla.sta_b.T|sla.surf_a.T|sla.surf_b.T|sla.surf_a.Q_flow|sla.surf_b.Q_flow",fileNamePrefix="Buildings_10_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference") Notification: Performance of loadFile(/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/ModelicaServices 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo): time 0.00163/0.00163, allocations: 114.9 kB / 16.37 MB, free: 5.539 MB / 14.72 MB Notification: Performance of loadFile(/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Complex 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo): time 0.001802/0.001802, allocations: 189.4 kB / 17.3 MB, free: 5.18 MB / 14.72 MB Notification: Performance of loadFile(/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Modelica 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo): time 1.307/1.307, allocations: 222.9 MB / 241 MB, free: 15.15 MB / 206.1 MB Notification: Performance of loadFile(/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Buildings 10.1.0-maint.10.0.x/package.mo): time 2.405/2.405, allocations: 437.1 MB / 0.7112 GB, free: 4.371 MB / 0.5762 GB Notification: Performance of FrontEnd - loaded program: time 0.001252/0.001252, allocations: 60.84 kB / 0.8707 GB, free: 1.438 MB / 0.6387 GB Notification: Performance of FrontEnd - Absyn->SCode: time 0.2663/0.2676, allocations: 151.6 MB / 1.019 GB, free: 9.848 MB / 0.795 GB Notification: Performance of NFInst.instantiate(Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference): time 0.03089/0.2985, allocations: 31.77 MB / 1.05 GB, free: 9.949 MB / 0.8262 GB Notification: Performance of NFInst.instExpressions: time 0.01639/0.3149, allocations: 12.29 MB / 1.062 GB, free: 13.62 MB / 0.8419 GB Notification: Performance of NFInst.updateImplicitVariability: time 0.001741/0.3167, allocations: 59.62 kB / 1.062 GB, free: 13.56 MB / 0.8419 GB Notification: Performance of NFTyping.typeComponents: time 0.002668/0.3194, allocations: 1.111 MB / 1.063 GB, free: 12.44 MB / 0.8419 GB Notification: Performance of NFTyping.typeBindings: time 0.005035/0.3245, allocations: 2.079 MB / 1.065 GB, free: 10.36 MB / 0.8419 GB Notification: Performance of NFTyping.typeClassSections: time 0.004578/0.3291, allocations: 1.862 MB / 1.067 GB, free: 8.5 MB / 0.8419 GB Notification: Performance of NFFlatten.flatten: time 0.4632/0.7923, allocations: 19.54 MB / 1.086 GB, free: 14.75 MB / 0.8419 GB Notification: Performance of NFFlatten.resolveConnections: time 0.01048/0.8028, allocations: 7.202 MB / 1.093 GB, free: 13.99 MB / 0.8419 GB Notification: Performance of NFEvalConstants.evaluate: time 0.01187/0.8147, allocations: 6.463 MB / 1.099 GB, free: 13.42 MB / 0.8419 GB Notification: Performance of NFSimplifyModel.simplify: time 0.009925/0.8246, allocations: 5.351 MB / 1.104 GB, free: 12.64 MB / 0.8419 GB Notification: Performance of NFPackage.collectConstants: time 0.002255/0.8269, allocations: 0.7488 MB / 1.105 GB, free: 12.64 MB / 0.8419 GB Notification: Performance of NFFlatten.collectFunctions: time 0.009075/0.836, allocations: 3.218 MB / 1.108 GB, free: 12.62 MB / 0.8419 GB Notification: Performance of NFScalarize.scalarize: time 0.004766/0.8408, allocations: 3.004 MB / 1.111 GB, free: 11.52 MB / 0.8419 GB Notification: Performance of NFVerifyModel.verify: time 0.01167/0.8525, allocations: 4.747 MB / 1.116 GB, free: 8.641 MB / 0.8419 GB Notification: Performance of NFConvertDAE.convert: time 0.02183/0.8743, allocations: 15.43 MB / 1.131 GB, free: 2.781 MB / 0.8419 GB Notification: Performance of FrontEnd - DAE generated: time 9.869e-06/0.8744, allocations: 0 / 1.131 GB, free: 2.781 MB / 0.8419 GB Notification: Performance of FrontEnd: time 3.377e-06/0.8744, allocations: 0 / 1.131 GB, free: 2.781 MB / 0.8419 GB Notification: Performance of Transformations before backend: time 0.0006478/0.875, allocations: 0 / 1.131 GB, free: 2.781 MB / 0.8419 GB Notification: Model statistics after passing the front-end and creating the data structures used by the back-end: * Number of equations: 866 * Number of variables: 866 Notification: Performance of Generate backend data structure: time 0.03576/0.9108, allocations: 11.49 MB / 1.142 GB, free: 11.72 MB / 0.8575 GB Notification: Performance of prepare preOptimizeDAE: time 4.517e-05/0.9109, allocations: 20.95 kB / 1.142 GB, free: 11.71 MB / 0.8575 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt normalInlineFunction (simulation): time 0.004396/0.9153, allocations: 0.8743 MB / 1.143 GB, free: 11.27 MB / 0.8575 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt evaluateParameters (simulation): time 0.02272/0.938, allocations: 9.61 MB / 1.152 GB, free: 5.707 MB / 0.8575 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt simplifyIfEquations (simulation): time 0.0003315/0.9384, allocations: 339.7 kB / 1.153 GB, free: 5.551 MB / 0.8575 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt expandDerOperator (simulation): time 0.002198/0.9406, allocations: 480.1 kB / 1.153 GB, free: 5.387 MB / 0.8575 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt clockPartitioning (simulation): time 0.0129/0.9535, allocations: 5.957 MB / 1.159 GB, free: 15.63 MB / 0.8731 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt findStateOrder (simulation): time 8.771e-05/0.9536, allocations: 18.56 kB / 1.159 GB, free: 15.62 MB / 0.8731 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt replaceEdgeChange (simulation): time 0.0004699/0.9541, allocations: 144 kB / 1.159 GB, free: 15.48 MB / 0.8731 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt inlineArrayEqn (simulation): time 0.0001026/0.9542, allocations: 99.45 kB / 1.159 GB, free: 15.38 MB / 0.8731 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt removeEqualRHS (simulation): time 0.008806/0.963, allocations: 4.763 MB / 1.164 GB, free: 10.66 MB / 0.8731 GB Warning: The model contains alias variables with redundant start and/or conflicting nominal values. It is recommended to resolve the conflicts, because otherwise the system could be hard to solve. To print the conflicting alias sets and the chosen candidates please use -d=aliasConflicts. Notification: Performance of preOpt removeSimpleEquations (simulation): time 0.06033/1.023, allocations: 33.76 MB / 1.197 GB, free: 7.582 MB / 0.9044 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt comSubExp (simulation): time 0.01228/1.036, allocations: 6.227 MB / 1.203 GB, free: 1.305 MB / 0.9044 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt resolveLoops (simulation): time 0.004048/1.04, allocations: 2.511 MB / 1.205 GB, free: 14.8 MB / 0.92 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt evalFunc (simulation): time 0.02666/1.066, allocations: 13.23 MB / 1.218 GB, free: 1.09 MB / 0.92 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt encapsulateWhenConditions (simulation): time 0.003075/1.07, allocations: 2.132 MB / 1.22 GB, free: 14.94 MB / 0.9356 GB Notification: Performance of pre-optimization done (n=224): time 3.667e-06/1.07, allocations: 0 / 1.22 GB, free: 14.94 MB / 0.9356 GB Notification: Performance of matching and sorting (n=232): time 0.02508/1.095, allocations: 14.02 MB / 1.234 GB, free: 0.7617 MB / 0.9356 GB Notification: Performance of inlineWhenForInitialization (initialization): time 7.618e-05/1.095, allocations: 128.8 kB / 1.234 GB, free: 0.6133 MB / 0.9356 GB Notification: Performance of selectInitializationVariablesDAE (initialization): time 0.01848/1.113, allocations: 10.42 MB / 1.244 GB, free: 6.195 MB / 0.9512 GB Notification: Performance of collectPreVariables (initialization): time 0.001023/1.114, allocations: 117.7 kB / 1.245 GB, free: 6.074 MB / 0.9512 GB Notification: Performance of collectInitialEqns (initialization): time 0.004394/1.119, allocations: 3.306 MB / 1.248 GB, free: 2.773 MB / 0.9512 GB Notification: Performance of collectInitialBindings (initialization): time 0.001959/1.121, allocations: 0.8677 MB / 1.249 GB, free: 1.914 MB / 0.9512 GB Notification: Performance of simplifyInitialFunctions (initialization): time 0.002212/1.123, allocations: 1.209 MB / 1.25 GB, free: 0.6953 MB / 0.9512 GB Notification: Performance of setup shared object (initialization): time 9.143e-05/1.123, allocations: 301.1 kB / 1.25 GB, free: 408 kB / 0.9512 GB Notification: Performance of preBalanceInitialSystem (initialization): time 0.004912/1.128, allocations: 3.447 MB / 1.253 GB, free: 12.93 MB / 0.9669 GB Notification: Performance of partitionIndependentBlocks (initialization): time 0.006443/1.134, allocations: 5.934 MB / 1.259 GB, free: 5.836 MB / 0.9669 GB Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3])) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3])) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3])) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3])) Notification: Performance of analyzeInitialSystem (initialization): time 0.05562/1.19, allocations: 36.65 MB / 1.295 GB, free: 92 kB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of solveInitialSystemEqSystem (initialization): time 5.746e-05/1.19, allocations: 24 kB / 1.295 GB, free: 68 kB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of matching and sorting (n=659) (initialization): time 0.01723/1.207, allocations: 10.08 MB / 1.305 GB, free: 6.406 MB / 1.014 GB Notification: Performance of prepare postOptimizeDAE: time 9.368e-05/1.208, allocations: 70.67 kB / 1.305 GB, free: 6.332 MB / 1.014 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyComplexFunction (initialization): time 0.0001075/1.208, allocations: 84 kB / 1.305 GB, free: 6.25 MB / 1.014 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt tearingSystem (initialization): time 0.001677/1.209, allocations: 0.7084 MB / 1.306 GB, free: 5.52 MB / 1.014 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt solveSimpleEquations (initialization): time 0.005162/1.214, allocations: 1.486 MB / 1.307 GB, free: 4.031 MB / 1.014 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt calculateStrongComponentJacobians (initialization): time 0.01233/1.227, allocations: 14.51 MB / 1.321 GB, free: 4.566 MB / 1.029 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyAllExpressions (initialization): time 0.009469/1.236, allocations: 1.185 MB / 1.323 GB, free: 3.379 MB / 1.029 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt collapseArrayExpressions (initialization): time 0.001248/1.238, allocations: 272 kB / 1.323 GB, free: 3.113 MB / 1.029 GB Warning: The initial conditions are over specified. The following 8 initial equations are redundant, so they are removed from the initialization system: sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3]) sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3]) sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3]) sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]). Notification: Performance of preBalanceInitialSystem (initialization_lambda0): time 0.01288/1.25, allocations: 7.088 MB / 1.33 GB, free: 12.02 MB / 1.045 GB Notification: Performance of partitionIndependentBlocks (initialization_lambda0): time 0.008564/1.259, allocations: 5.93 MB / 1.336 GB, free: 4.891 MB / 1.045 GB Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3])) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3])) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3])) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3])) Notification: Performance of analyzeInitialSystem (initialization_lambda0): time 0.06487/1.324, allocations: 36.57 MB / 1.371 GB, free: 14.89 MB / 1.092 GB Notification: Performance of solveInitialSystemEqSystem (initialization_lambda0): time 6.823e-05/1.324, allocations: 24 kB / 1.371 GB, free: 14.87 MB / 1.092 GB Notification: Performance of matching and sorting (n=659) (initialization_lambda0): time 0.02198/1.346, allocations: 10.06 MB / 1.381 GB, free: 4.723 MB / 1.092 GB Notification: Performance of prepare postOptimizeDAE: time 0.0001264/1.346, allocations: 77.75 kB / 1.381 GB, free: 4.641 MB / 1.092 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyComplexFunction (initialization): time 0.0001321/1.346, allocations: 87.94 kB / 1.381 GB, free: 4.555 MB / 1.092 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt tearingSystem (initialization): time 0.001792/1.348, allocations: 0.7084 MB / 1.382 GB, free: 3.824 MB / 1.092 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt solveSimpleEquations (initialization): time 0.00602/1.354, allocations: 1.474 MB / 1.383 GB, free: 2.348 MB / 1.092 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt calculateStrongComponentJacobians (initialization): time 0.01244/1.367, allocations: 14.53 MB / 1.398 GB, free: 2.859 MB / 1.107 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyAllExpressions (initialization): time 0.009733/1.376, allocations: 1.17 MB / 1.399 GB, free: 1.688 MB / 1.107 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt collapseArrayExpressions (initialization): time 0.001331/1.378, allocations: 284 kB / 1.399 GB, free: 1.41 MB / 1.107 GB Warning: The initial conditions are over specified. The following 8 initial equations are redundant, so they are removed from the initialization_lambda0 system: sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3]) sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3]) sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3]) sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]). Notification: Model statistics after passing the back-end for initialization: * Number of independent subsystems: 384 * Number of states: 0 () * Number of discrete variables: 5 ($PRE.pulse.count,$PRE.pulse.T_start,pulse.count,pulse.T_start,$whenCondition1) * Number of discrete states: 0 () * Number of clocked states: 0 () * Top-level inputs: 0 Notification: Strong component statistics for initialization (635): * Single equations (assignments): 627 * Array equations: 0 * Algorithm blocks: 1 * Record equations: 0 * When equations: 0 * If-equations: 0 * Equation systems (not torn): 0 * Torn equation systems: 7 * Mixed (continuous/discrete) equation systems: 0 Notification: Torn system details for strict tearing set: * Linear torn systems (#iteration vars, #inner vars, density): 7 systems {(1,9,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,9,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%)} * Non-linear torn systems (#iteration vars, #inner vars): 0 systems Notification: Performance of prepare postOptimizeDAE: time 0.002302/1.38, allocations: 0.7592 MB / 1.4 GB, free: 0.6406 MB / 1.107 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt lateInlineFunction (simulation): time 0.002684/1.383, allocations: 0.6638 MB / 1.4 GB, free: 15.96 MB / 1.123 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt wrapFunctionCalls (simulation): time 0.01061/1.393, allocations: 5.155 MB / 1.405 GB, free: 10.78 MB / 1.123 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt inlineArrayEqn (simulation): time 2.624e-05/1.394, allocations: 20 kB / 1.405 GB, free: 10.76 MB / 1.123 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt constantLinearSystem (simulation): time 1.643e-05/1.394, allocations: 4 kB / 1.405 GB, free: 10.76 MB / 1.123 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifysemiLinear (simulation): time 0.006189/1.4, allocations: 3.97 MB / 1.409 GB, free: 6.75 MB / 1.123 GB Warning: The model contains alias variables with redundant start and/or conflicting nominal values. It is recommended to resolve the conflicts, because otherwise the system could be hard to solve. To print the conflicting alias sets and the chosen candidates please use -d=aliasConflicts. Notification: Performance of postOpt removeSimpleEquations (simulation): time 0.03137/1.431, allocations: 13.41 MB / 1.422 GB, free: 9.164 MB / 1.139 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyComplexFunction (simulation): time 1.493e-05/1.431, allocations: 4 kB / 1.422 GB, free: 9.16 MB / 1.139 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt solveSimpleEquations (simulation): time 0.002739/1.434, allocations: 0.601 MB / 1.423 GB, free: 8.559 MB / 1.139 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt tearingSystem (simulation): time 0.00156/1.436, allocations: 0.5794 MB / 1.424 GB, free: 7.957 MB / 1.139 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt inputDerivativesUsed (simulation): time 0.0003975/1.436, allocations: 135.9 kB / 1.424 GB, free: 7.824 MB / 1.139 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt calculateStrongComponentJacobians (simulation): time 0.01262/1.449, allocations: 14.4 MB / 1.438 GB, free: 8.465 MB / 1.154 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt calculateStateSetsJacobians (simulation): time 4.769e-06/1.449, allocations: 4 kB / 1.438 GB, free: 8.461 MB / 1.154 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt symbolicJacobian (simulation): time 0.01221/1.461, allocations: 7.114 MB / 1.445 GB, free: 1.254 MB / 1.154 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt removeConstants (simulation): time 0.005988/1.467, allocations: 1.668 MB / 1.446 GB, free: 15.56 MB / 1.17 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyTimeIndepFuncCalls (simulation): time 0.002359/1.469, allocations: 123.9 kB / 1.446 GB, free: 15.44 MB / 1.17 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyAllExpressions (simulation): time 0.005457/1.475, allocations: 0.6125 MB / 1.447 GB, free: 14.82 MB / 1.17 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt findZeroCrossings (simulation): time 0.0004795/1.475, allocations: 168.4 kB / 1.447 GB, free: 14.66 MB / 1.17 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt collapseArrayExpressions (simulation): time 0.0002671/1.475, allocations: 83.95 kB / 1.447 GB, free: 14.58 MB / 1.17 GB Notification: Performance of sorting global known variables: time 0.0146/1.49, allocations: 7.339 MB / 1.454 GB, free: 7.254 MB / 1.17 GB Notification: Performance of sort global known variables: time 2.4e-07/1.49, allocations: 0 / 1.454 GB, free: 7.254 MB / 1.17 GB Notification: Performance of remove unused functions: time 0.01789/1.508, allocations: 3.965 MB / 1.458 GB, free: 3.289 MB / 1.17 GB Notification: Model statistics after passing the back-end for simulation: * Number of independent subsystems: 12 * Number of states: 43 (sla.vol[1].dynBal.U,sla.vol[2].dynBal.U,sla.vol[3].dynBal.U,sla.vol[4].dynBal.U,sla.vol[5].dynBal.U,sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_b[1].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[2].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[3].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[4].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[5].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T[3],TOut.T) * Number of discrete variables: 3 ($whenCondition1,pulse.T_start,pulse.count) * Number of discrete states: 1 (pulse.count) * Number of clocked states: 0 () * Top-level inputs: 0 Notification: Strong component statistics for simulation (210): * Single equations (assignments): 199 * Array equations: 0 * Algorithm blocks: 0 * Record equations: 2 * When equations: 2 * If-equations: 0 * Equation systems (not torn): 0 * Torn equation systems: 7 * Mixed (continuous/discrete) equation systems: 0 Notification: Torn system details for strict tearing set: * Linear torn systems (#iteration vars, #inner vars, density): 7 systems {(1,9,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,9,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%)} * Non-linear torn systems (#iteration vars, #inner vars): 0 systems Notification: Performance of Backend phase and start with SimCode phase: time 0.00252/1.511, allocations: 0.6107 MB / 1.459 GB, free: 2.711 MB / 1.17 GB Notification: Performance of simCode: created initialization part: time 0.02206/1.533, allocations: 13.43 MB / 1.472 GB, free: 5.102 MB / 1.186 GB Notification: Performance of simCode: created event and clocks part: time 9.588e-06/1.533, allocations: 0 / 1.472 GB, free: 5.102 MB / 1.186 GB Notification: Performance of simCode: created simulation system equations: time 0.004929/1.538, allocations: 3.048 MB / 1.475 GB, free: 1.961 MB / 1.186 GB Notification: Performance of simCode: created of all other equations (e.g. parameter, nominal, assert, etc): time 0.01591/1.554, allocations: 2.934 MB / 1.478 GB, free: 15.08 MB / 1.201 GB Notification: Performance of simCode: created linear, non-linear and system jacobian parts: time 0.03453/1.588, allocations: 18.76 MB / 1.496 GB, free: 12.3 MB / 1.217 GB Notification: Performance of simCode: some other stuff during SimCode phase: time 0.007807/1.596, allocations: 5.373 MB / 1.501 GB, free: 6.883 MB / 1.217 GB Notification: Performance of simCode: alias equations: time 0.0148/1.611, allocations: 6.431 MB / 1.508 GB, free: 476 kB / 1.217 GB Notification: Performance of simCode: all other stuff during SimCode phase: time 0.002594/1.613, allocations: 427.4 kB / 1.508 GB, free: 48 kB / 1.217 GB Notification: Performance of SimCode: time 7.81e-07/1.613, allocations: 0 / 1.508 GB, free: 48 kB / 1.217 GB Notification: Performance of Templates: time 0.6364/2.25, allocations: 136 MB / 1.641 GB, free: 376 MB / 1.248 GB make -j1 -f Buildings_10_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference.makefile (rm -f Buildings_10_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference.pipe ; mkfifo Buildings_10_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference.pipe ; head -c 1048576 < Buildings_10_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference.pipe >> ../files/Buildings_10_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference.sim & ./Buildings_10_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference -abortSlowSimulation -alarm=480 -s gbode -emit_protected -lv LOG_STATS > Buildings_10_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference.pipe 2>&1) diffSimulationResults("Buildings_10_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference_res.mat","/mnt/ReferenceFiles/Buildings/csv/maint_10.0.x/Buildings_Fluid_HeatExchangers_RadiantSlabs_Examples_StepResponseFiniteDifference.csv","/var/lib/jenkins1/ws/OpenModelicaLibraryTestingWork/OpenModelicaLibraryTesting/files/Buildings_10_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference.diff",relTol=0.003,relTolDiffMinMax=0.003,rangeDelta=0.001) Reference file matches