Running: ./testmodel.py --libraries=/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries --ompython_omhome=/usr Buildings_10_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.conf.json
loadFile("/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/ModelicaServices 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo", uses=false)
loadFile("/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Complex 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo", uses=false)
loadFile("/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Modelica 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo", uses=false)
loadFile("/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Buildings 10.1.0-maint.10.0.x/package.mo", uses=false)
Using package Buildings with version 10.1.0 (/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Buildings 10.1.0-maint.10.0.x/package.mo)
Using package Modelica with version 4.0.0 (/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Modelica 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo)
Using package Complex with version 4.0.0 (/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Complex 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo)
Using package ModelicaServices with version 4.0.0 (/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/ModelicaServices 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo)
Running command: translateModel(Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU,tolerance=1e-06,outputFormat="mat",numberOfIntervals=5000,variableFilter="time|sla.sta_b.T|sla.surf_a.T|sla.surf_b.T|sla.surf_a.Q_flow|sla.surf_b.Q_flow",fileNamePrefix="Buildings_10_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU")
translateModel(Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU,tolerance=1e-06,outputFormat="mat",numberOfIntervals=5000,variableFilter="time|sla.sta_b.T|sla.surf_a.T|sla.surf_b.T|sla.surf_a.Q_flow|sla.surf_b.Q_flow",fileNamePrefix="Buildings_10_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU")
Notification: Performance of loadFile(/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/ModelicaServices 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo): time 0.001467/0.001467, allocations: 114.5 kB / 16.37 MB, free: 6.016 MB / 14.72 MB
Notification: Performance of loadFile(/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Complex 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo): time 0.001708/0.001708, allocations: 194.5 kB / 17.31 MB, free: 5.613 MB / 14.72 MB
Notification: Performance of loadFile(/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Modelica 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo): time 1.301/1.301, allocations: 222.9 MB / 241 MB, free: 15.19 MB / 206.1 MB
Notification: Performance of loadFile(/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Buildings 10.1.0-maint.10.0.x/package.mo): time 2.402/2.402, allocations: 437.1 MB / 0.7112 GB, free: 4.359 MB / 0.5762 GB
Notification: Performance of FrontEnd - loaded program: time 0.001437/0.001438, allocations: 60.09 kB / 0.8707 GB, free: 1.422 MB / 0.6387 GB
Notification: Performance of FrontEnd - Absyn->SCode: time 0.2489/0.2504, allocations: 151.6 MB / 1.019 GB, free: 9.84 MB / 0.795 GB
Notification: Performance of NFInst.instantiate(Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU): time 0.03065/0.2811, allocations: 31.76 MB / 1.05 GB, free: 9.949 MB / 0.8262 GB
Notification: Performance of NFInst.instExpressions: time 0.01649/0.2976, allocations: 12.29 MB / 1.062 GB, free: 13.62 MB / 0.8419 GB
Notification: Performance of NFInst.updateImplicitVariability: time 0.001777/0.2994, allocations: 63.69 kB / 1.062 GB, free: 13.55 MB / 0.8419 GB
Notification: Performance of NFTyping.typeComponents: time 0.003006/0.3024, allocations: 1.103 MB / 1.063 GB, free: 12.45 MB / 0.8419 GB
Notification: Performance of NFTyping.typeBindings: time 0.005363/0.3079, allocations: 2.085 MB / 1.065 GB, free: 10.36 MB / 0.8419 GB
Notification: Performance of NFTyping.typeClassSections: time 0.005322/0.3132, allocations: 1.853 MB / 1.067 GB, free: 8.508 MB / 0.8419 GB
Notification: Performance of NFFlatten.flatten: time 0.445/0.7582, allocations: 19.54 MB / 1.086 GB, free: 14.73 MB / 0.8419 GB
Notification: Performance of NFFlatten.resolveConnections: time 0.01042/0.7687, allocations: 7.196 MB / 1.093 GB, free: 13.98 MB / 0.8419 GB
Notification: Performance of NFEvalConstants.evaluate: time 0.01225/0.781, allocations: 6.461 MB / 1.099 GB, free: 13.41 MB / 0.8419 GB
Notification: Performance of NFSimplifyModel.simplify: time 0.01007/0.7911, allocations: 5.351 MB / 1.104 GB, free: 12.62 MB / 0.8419 GB
Notification: Performance of NFPackage.collectConstants: time 0.002873/0.794, allocations: 0.7491 MB / 1.105 GB, free: 12.62 MB / 0.8419 GB
Notification: Performance of NFFlatten.collectFunctions: time 0.009365/0.8034, allocations: 3.217 MB / 1.108 GB, free: 12.6 MB / 0.8419 GB
Notification: Performance of NFScalarize.scalarize: time 0.005779/0.8092, allocations: 3.001 MB / 1.111 GB, free: 11.51 MB / 0.8419 GB
Notification: Performance of NFVerifyModel.verify: time 0.01127/0.8205, allocations: 4.748 MB / 1.116 GB, free: 8.633 MB / 0.8419 GB
Notification: Performance of NFConvertDAE.convert: time 0.01916/0.8396, allocations: 15.43 MB / 1.131 GB, free: 2.781 MB / 0.8419 GB
Notification: Performance of FrontEnd - DAE generated: time 6.602e-06/0.8397, allocations: 3.984 kB / 1.131 GB, free: 2.777 MB / 0.8419 GB
Notification: Performance of FrontEnd: time 1.683e-06/0.8397, allocations: 0 / 1.131 GB, free: 2.777 MB / 0.8419 GB
Notification: Performance of Transformations before backend: time 0.0003965/0.8401, allocations: 0 / 1.131 GB, free: 2.777 MB / 0.8419 GB
Notification: Model statistics after passing the front-end and creating the data structures used by the back-end:
 * Number of equations: 866
 * Number of variables: 866
Notification: Performance of Generate backend data structure: time 0.03118/0.8713, allocations: 11.5 MB / 1.142 GB, free: 11.71 MB / 0.8575 GB
Notification: Performance of prepare preOptimizeDAE: time 3.933e-05/0.8713, allocations: 15.14 kB / 1.142 GB, free: 11.71 MB / 0.8575 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt normalInlineFunction (simulation): time 0.003174/0.8745, allocations: 0.8741 MB / 1.143 GB, free: 11.27 MB / 0.8575 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt evaluateParameters (simulation): time 0.01894/0.8934, allocations: 9.619 MB / 1.152 GB, free: 5.703 MB / 0.8575 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt simplifyIfEquations (simulation): time 0.000222/0.8937, allocations: 336.2 kB / 1.153 GB, free: 5.547 MB / 0.8575 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt expandDerOperator (simulation): time 0.001025/0.8947, allocations: 475.3 kB / 1.153 GB, free: 5.387 MB / 0.8575 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt clockPartitioning (simulation): time 0.009128/0.9039, allocations: 5.959 MB / 1.159 GB, free: 15.62 MB / 0.8731 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt findStateOrder (simulation): time 7.208e-05/0.904, allocations: 23.67 kB / 1.159 GB, free: 15.6 MB / 0.8731 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt replaceEdgeChange (simulation): time 0.000392/0.9044, allocations: 147 kB / 1.159 GB, free: 15.46 MB / 0.8731 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt inlineArrayEqn (simulation): time 8.202e-05/0.9044, allocations: 88 kB / 1.159 GB, free: 15.38 MB / 0.8731 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt removeEqualRHS (simulation): time 0.007172/0.9116, allocations: 4.76 MB / 1.164 GB, free: 10.66 MB / 0.8731 GB
Warning: The model contains alias variables with redundant start and/or conflicting nominal values. It is recommended to resolve the conflicts, because otherwise the system could be hard to solve. To print the conflicting alias sets and the chosen candidates please use -d=aliasConflicts.
Notification: Performance of preOpt removeSimpleEquations (simulation): time 0.05724/0.9689, allocations: 33.77 MB / 1.197 GB, free: 7.57 MB / 0.9044 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt comSubExp (simulation): time 0.0117/0.9806, allocations: 6.23 MB / 1.203 GB, free: 1.301 MB / 0.9044 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt resolveLoops (simulation): time 0.004403/0.985, allocations: 2.511 MB / 1.205 GB, free: 14.79 MB / 0.92 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt evalFunc (simulation): time 0.03038/1.015, allocations: 13.23 MB / 1.218 GB, free: 1.082 MB / 0.92 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt encapsulateWhenConditions (simulation): time 0.003651/1.019, allocations: 2.132 MB / 1.22 GB, free: 14.93 MB / 0.9356 GB
Notification: Performance of pre-optimization done (n=224): time 4.549e-06/1.019, allocations: 0 / 1.22 GB, free: 14.93 MB / 0.9356 GB
Notification: Performance of matching and sorting (n=232): time 0.03141/1.051, allocations: 14.02 MB / 1.234 GB, free: 0.7578 MB / 0.9356 GB
Notification: Performance of inlineWhenForInitialization (initialization): time 8.085e-05/1.051, allocations: 132.8 kB / 1.234 GB, free: 0.6055 MB / 0.9356 GB
Notification: Performance of selectInitializationVariablesDAE (initialization): time 0.02098/1.072, allocations: 10.42 MB / 1.244 GB, free: 6.195 MB / 0.9512 GB
Notification: Performance of collectPreVariables (initialization): time 0.00104/1.073, allocations: 121.7 kB / 1.245 GB, free: 6.07 MB / 0.9512 GB
Notification: Performance of collectInitialEqns (initialization): time 0.005015/1.078, allocations: 3.305 MB / 1.248 GB, free: 2.773 MB / 0.9512 GB
Notification: Performance of collectInitialBindings (initialization): time 0.00214/1.08, allocations: 0.8703 MB / 1.249 GB, free: 1.91 MB / 0.9512 GB
Notification: Performance of simplifyInitialFunctions (initialization): time 0.003682/1.084, allocations: 1.205 MB / 1.25 GB, free: 0.6953 MB / 0.9512 GB
Notification: Performance of setup shared object (initialization): time 8.308e-05/1.084, allocations: 301.1 kB / 1.25 GB, free: 408 kB / 0.9512 GB
Notification: Performance of preBalanceInitialSystem (initialization): time 0.005495/1.089, allocations: 3.461 MB / 1.253 GB, free: 12.92 MB / 0.9669 GB
Notification: Performance of partitionIndependentBlocks (initialization): time 0.007028/1.096, allocations: 5.924 MB / 1.259 GB, free: 5.832 MB / 0.9669 GB
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3]))
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3]))
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3]))
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]))
Notification: Performance of analyzeInitialSystem (initialization): time 0.05901/1.155, allocations: 36.65 MB / 1.295 GB, free: 96 kB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of solveInitialSystemEqSystem (initialization): time 7.208e-05/1.155, allocations: 24 kB / 1.295 GB, free: 72 kB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of matching and sorting (n=659) (initialization): time 0.01894/1.174, allocations: 10.08 MB / 1.305 GB, free: 6.418 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of prepare postOptimizeDAE: time 0.0001348/1.175, allocations: 66.7 kB / 1.305 GB, free: 6.348 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyComplexFunction (initialization): time 0.0001345/1.175, allocations: 84 kB / 1.305 GB, free: 6.266 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt tearingSystem (initialization): time 0.001647/1.176, allocations: 0.7183 MB / 1.306 GB, free: 5.535 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt solveSimpleEquations (initialization): time 0.005402/1.182, allocations: 1.484 MB / 1.307 GB, free: 4.074 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt calculateStrongComponentJacobians (initialization): time 0.01164/1.193, allocations: 14.52 MB / 1.321 GB, free: 4.602 MB / 1.029 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyAllExpressions (initialization): time 0.009581/1.203, allocations: 1.181 MB / 1.323 GB, free: 3.418 MB / 1.029 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt collapseArrayExpressions (initialization): time 0.001222/1.204, allocations: 280 kB / 1.323 GB, free: 3.145 MB / 1.029 GB
Warning: The initial conditions are over specified. The following 8 initial equations are redundant, so they are removed from the initialization system:
         sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start
         sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start
         sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start
         sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start
         sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3])
         sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3])
         sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3])
         sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]).
Notification: Performance of preBalanceInitialSystem (initialization_lambda0): time 0.01194/1.216, allocations: 7.082 MB / 1.33 GB, free: 12.05 MB / 1.045 GB
Notification: Performance of partitionIndependentBlocks (initialization_lambda0): time 0.007986/1.224, allocations: 5.935 MB / 1.336 GB, free: 4.922 MB / 1.045 GB
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3]))
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3]))
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3]))
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]))
Notification: Performance of analyzeInitialSystem (initialization_lambda0): time 0.05641/1.281, allocations: 36.56 MB / 1.371 GB, free: 14.94 MB / 1.092 GB
Notification: Performance of solveInitialSystemEqSystem (initialization_lambda0): time 8.803e-05/1.281, allocations: 24 kB / 1.371 GB, free: 14.91 MB / 1.092 GB
Notification: Performance of matching and sorting (n=659) (initialization_lambda0): time 0.01787/1.299, allocations: 10.07 MB / 1.381 GB, free: 4.762 MB / 1.092 GB
Notification: Performance of prepare postOptimizeDAE: time 8.542e-05/1.299, allocations: 75.92 kB / 1.381 GB, free: 4.684 MB / 1.092 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyComplexFunction (initialization): time 0.0001022/1.299, allocations: 87.94 kB / 1.381 GB, free: 4.598 MB / 1.092 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt tearingSystem (initialization): time 0.001606/1.301, allocations: 0.7099 MB / 1.382 GB, free: 3.867 MB / 1.092 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt solveSimpleEquations (initialization): time 0.00505/1.306, allocations: 1.482 MB / 1.383 GB, free: 2.383 MB / 1.092 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt calculateStrongComponentJacobians (initialization): time 0.01212/1.318, allocations: 14.52 MB / 1.398 GB, free: 2.902 MB / 1.107 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyAllExpressions (initialization): time 0.01033/1.328, allocations: 1.174 MB / 1.399 GB, free: 1.727 MB / 1.107 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt collapseArrayExpressions (initialization): time 0.001241/1.329, allocations: 280 kB / 1.399 GB, free: 1.453 MB / 1.107 GB
Warning: The initial conditions are over specified. The following 8 initial equations are redundant, so they are removed from the initialization_lambda0 system:
         sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start
         sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start
         sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start
         sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start
         sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3])
         sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3])
         sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3])
         sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]).
Notification: Model statistics after passing the back-end for initialization:
 * Number of independent subsystems: 384
 * Number of states: 0 ()
 * Number of discrete variables: 5 ($PRE.pulse.count,$PRE.pulse.T_start,pulse.count,pulse.T_start,$whenCondition1)
 * Number of discrete states: 0 ()
 * Number of clocked states: 0 ()
 * Top-level inputs: 0
Notification: Strong component statistics for initialization (635):
 * Single equations (assignments): 627
 * Array equations: 0
 * Algorithm blocks: 1
 * Record equations: 0
 * When equations: 0
 * If-equations: 0
 * Equation systems (not torn): 0
 * Torn equation systems: 7
 * Mixed (continuous/discrete) equation systems: 0
Notification: Torn system details for strict tearing set:
 * Linear torn systems (#iteration vars, #inner vars, density): 7 systems
   {(1,9,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,9,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%)}
 * Non-linear torn systems (#iteration vars, #inner vars): 0 systems
Notification: Performance of prepare postOptimizeDAE: time 0.002152/1.331, allocations: 0.7667 MB / 1.4 GB, free: 0.6758 MB / 1.107 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt lateInlineFunction (simulation): time 0.0026/1.334, allocations: 0.6594 MB / 1.4 GB, free: 8 kB / 1.107 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt wrapFunctionCalls (simulation): time 0.01024/1.344, allocations: 5.143 MB / 1.405 GB, free: 10.83 MB / 1.123 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt inlineArrayEqn (simulation): time 2.574e-05/1.344, allocations: 24 kB / 1.405 GB, free: 10.8 MB / 1.123 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt constantLinearSystem (simulation): time 1.781e-05/1.344, allocations: 4 kB / 1.405 GB, free: 10.8 MB / 1.123 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifysemiLinear (simulation): time 0.006129/1.351, allocations: 3.966 MB / 1.409 GB, free: 6.797 MB / 1.123 GB
Warning: The model contains alias variables with redundant start and/or conflicting nominal values. It is recommended to resolve the conflicts, because otherwise the system could be hard to solve. To print the conflicting alias sets and the chosen candidates please use -d=aliasConflicts.
Notification: Performance of postOpt removeSimpleEquations (simulation): time 0.02922/1.38, allocations: 13.42 MB / 1.422 GB, free: 9.207 MB / 1.139 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyComplexFunction (simulation): time 1.089e-05/1.38, allocations: 0 / 1.422 GB, free: 9.207 MB / 1.139 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt solveSimpleEquations (simulation): time 0.002655/1.382, allocations: 0.6049 MB / 1.423 GB, free: 8.602 MB / 1.139 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt tearingSystem (simulation): time 0.001462/1.384, allocations: 0.5833 MB / 1.424 GB, free: 7.996 MB / 1.139 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt inputDerivativesUsed (simulation): time 0.0003574/1.384, allocations: 131.9 kB / 1.424 GB, free: 7.867 MB / 1.139 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt calculateStrongComponentJacobians (simulation): time 0.01156/1.396, allocations: 14.4 MB / 1.438 GB, free: 8.504 MB / 1.154 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt calculateStateSetsJacobians (simulation): time 3.747e-06/1.396, allocations: 0 / 1.438 GB, free: 8.504 MB / 1.154 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt symbolicJacobian (simulation): time 0.01248/1.408, allocations: 7.118 MB / 1.445 GB, free: 1.293 MB / 1.154 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt removeConstants (simulation): time 0.005959/1.414, allocations: 1.664 MB / 1.446 GB, free: 15.6 MB / 1.17 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyTimeIndepFuncCalls (simulation): time 0.002713/1.417, allocations: 135.8 kB / 1.446 GB, free: 15.47 MB / 1.17 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyAllExpressions (simulation): time 0.006001/1.423, allocations: 0.6044 MB / 1.447 GB, free: 14.86 MB / 1.17 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt findZeroCrossings (simulation): time 0.0005908/1.424, allocations: 169.7 kB / 1.447 GB, free: 14.7 MB / 1.17 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt collapseArrayExpressions (simulation): time 0.000349/1.424, allocations: 83.95 kB / 1.447 GB, free: 14.62 MB / 1.17 GB
Notification: Performance of sorting global known variables: time 0.01629/1.44, allocations: 7.331 MB / 1.454 GB, free: 7.297 MB / 1.17 GB
Notification: Performance of sort global known variables: time 4.01e-07/1.44, allocations: 4 kB / 1.454 GB, free: 7.293 MB / 1.17 GB
Notification: Performance of remove unused functions: time 0.01961/1.46, allocations: 3.961 MB / 1.458 GB, free: 3.332 MB / 1.17 GB
Notification: Model statistics after passing the back-end for simulation:
 * Number of independent subsystems: 12
 * Number of states: 43 (sla.vol[1].dynBal.U,sla.vol[2].dynBal.U,sla.vol[3].dynBal.U,sla.vol[4].dynBal.U,sla.vol[5].dynBal.U,sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_b[1].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[2].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[3].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[4].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[5].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T[3],TOut.T)
 * Number of discrete variables: 3 ($whenCondition1,pulse.T_start,pulse.count)
 * Number of discrete states: 1 (pulse.count)
 * Number of clocked states: 0 ()
 * Top-level inputs: 0
Notification: Strong component statistics for simulation (210):
 * Single equations (assignments): 199
 * Array equations: 0
 * Algorithm blocks: 0
 * Record equations: 2
 * When equations: 2
 * If-equations: 0
 * Equation systems (not torn): 0
 * Torn equation systems: 7
 * Mixed (continuous/discrete) equation systems: 0
Notification: Torn system details for strict tearing set:
 * Linear torn systems (#iteration vars, #inner vars, density): 7 systems
   {(1,9,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,9,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%)}
 * Non-linear torn systems (#iteration vars, #inner vars): 0 systems
Notification: Performance of Backend phase and start with SimCode phase: time 0.002454/1.463, allocations: 0.6009 MB / 1.459 GB, free: 2.762 MB / 1.17 GB
Notification: Performance of simCode: created initialization part: time 0.02158/1.484, allocations: 13.42 MB / 1.472 GB, free: 5.156 MB / 1.186 GB
Notification: Performance of simCode: created event and clocks part: time 8.065e-06/1.484, allocations: 0 / 1.472 GB, free: 5.156 MB / 1.186 GB
Notification: Performance of simCode: created simulation system equations: time 0.004615/1.489, allocations: 3.048 MB / 1.475 GB, free: 2.016 MB / 1.186 GB
Notification: Performance of simCode: created of all other equations (e.g. parameter, nominal, assert, etc): time 0.01726/1.506, allocations: 2.937 MB / 1.478 GB, free: 15.12 MB / 1.201 GB
Notification: Performance of simCode: created linear, non-linear and system jacobian parts: time 0.03307/1.539, allocations: 18.78 MB / 1.496 GB, free: 12.33 MB / 1.217 GB
Notification: Performance of simCode: some other stuff during SimCode phase: time 0.007851/1.547, allocations: 5.365 MB / 1.501 GB, free: 6.922 MB / 1.217 GB
Notification: Performance of simCode: alias equations: time 0.01544/1.563, allocations: 6.429 MB / 1.508 GB, free: 0.5 MB / 1.217 GB
Notification: Performance of simCode: all other stuff during SimCode phase: time 0.0027/1.565, allocations: 427.4 kB / 1.508 GB, free: 84 kB / 1.217 GB
Notification: Performance of SimCode: time 1.162e-06/1.565, allocations: 0 / 1.508 GB, free: 84 kB / 1.217 GB
Notification: Performance of Templates: time 0.6166/2.182, allocations: 136 MB / 1.641 GB, free: 376 MB / 1.248 GB
make -j1 -f Buildings_10_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.makefile
(rm -f Buildings_10_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.pipe ; mkfifo Buildings_10_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.pipe ; head -c 1048576 < Buildings_10_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.pipe >> ../files/Buildings_10_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.sim & ./Buildings_10_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU  -abortSlowSimulation -alarm=480 -s gbode -emit_protected -lv LOG_STATS > Buildings_10_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.pipe 2>&1)
diffSimulationResults("Buildings_10_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU_res.mat","/mnt/ReferenceFiles/Buildings/csv/maint_10.0.x/Buildings_Fluid_HeatExchangers_RadiantSlabs_Examples_StepResponseEpsilonNTU.csv","/var/lib/jenkins1/ws/OpenModelicaLibraryTestingWork/OpenModelicaLibraryTesting/files/Buildings_10_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.diff",relTol=0.003,relTolDiffMinMax=0.003,rangeDelta=0.001)
Reference file matches