Running: ./testmodel.py --libraries=/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries --ompython_omhome=/usr Buildings_latest_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.conf.json
loadFile("/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/ModelicaServices 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo", uses=false)
loadFile("/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Complex 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo", uses=false)
loadFile("/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Modelica 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo", uses=false)
loadFile("/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Buildings 11.0.0-master/package.mo", uses=false)
Using package Buildings with version 11.0.0 (/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Buildings 11.0.0-master/package.mo)
Using package Modelica with version 4.0.0 (/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Modelica 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo)
Using package Complex with version 4.0.0 (/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Complex 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo)
Using package ModelicaServices with version 4.0.0 (/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/ModelicaServices 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo)
Running command: translateModel(Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU,tolerance=1e-06,outputFormat="mat",numberOfIntervals=5000,variableFilter="time|sla.sta_b.T|sla.surf_a.T|sla.surf_b.T|sla.surf_a.Q_flow|sla.surf_b.Q_flow",fileNamePrefix="Buildings_latest_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU")
translateModel(Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU,tolerance=1e-06,outputFormat="mat",numberOfIntervals=5000,variableFilter="time|sla.sta_b.T|sla.surf_a.T|sla.surf_b.T|sla.surf_a.Q_flow|sla.surf_b.Q_flow",fileNamePrefix="Buildings_latest_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU")
Notification: Performance of loadFile(/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/ModelicaServices 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo): time 0.001528/0.001528, allocations: 102 kB / 16.37 MB, free: 6.441 MB / 14.72 MB
Notification: Performance of loadFile(/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Complex 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo): time 0.001688/0.001688, allocations: 195.3 kB / 17.31 MB, free: 5.812 MB / 14.72 MB
Notification: Performance of loadFile(/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Modelica 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo): time 1.312/1.312, allocations: 222.9 MB / 241 MB, free: 15.18 MB / 206.1 MB
Notification: Performance of loadFile(/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Buildings 11.0.0-master/package.mo): time 2.417/2.417, allocations: 442.6 MB / 0.7165 GB, free: 14.71 MB / 0.5919 GB
Notification: Performance of FrontEnd - loaded program: time 0.001282/0.001282, allocations: 72.14 kB / 0.8773 GB, free: 11 MB / 0.6544 GB
Notification: Performance of FrontEnd - Absyn->SCode: time 0.3084/0.3097, allocations: 153 MB / 1.027 GB, free: 2.094 MB / 0.795 GB
Notification: Performance of NFInst.instantiate(Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU): time 0.03345/0.3432, allocations: 31.77 MB / 1.058 GB, free: 2.211 MB / 0.8262 GB
Notification: Performance of NFInst.instExpressions: time 0.01883/0.3621, allocations: 12.28 MB / 1.07 GB, free: 5.883 MB / 0.8419 GB
Notification: Performance of NFInst.updateImplicitVariability: time 0.002365/0.3645, allocations: 59.69 kB / 1.07 GB, free: 5.824 MB / 0.8419 GB
Notification: Performance of NFTyping.typeComponents: time 0.003495/0.368, allocations: 1.107 MB / 1.071 GB, free: 4.711 MB / 0.8419 GB
Notification: Performance of NFTyping.typeBindings: time 0.006588/0.3747, allocations: 2.08 MB / 1.073 GB, free: 2.621 MB / 0.8419 GB
Notification: Performance of NFTyping.typeClassSections: time 0.005525/0.3802, allocations: 1.869 MB / 1.075 GB, free: 0.7578 MB / 0.8419 GB
Notification: Performance of NFFlatten.flatten: time 0.5859/0.9661, allocations: 19.54 MB / 1.094 GB, free: 14.36 MB / 0.8419 GB
Notification: Performance of NFFlatten.resolveConnections: time 0.0122/0.9784, allocations: 7.2 MB / 1.101 GB, free: 12.88 MB / 0.8419 GB
Notification: Performance of NFEvalConstants.evaluate: time 0.01488/0.9933, allocations: 6.462 MB / 1.107 GB, free: 10.91 MB / 0.8419 GB
Notification: Performance of NFSimplifyModel.simplify: time 0.01196/1.005, allocations: 5.341 MB / 1.112 GB, free: 9.059 MB / 0.8419 GB
Notification: Performance of NFPackage.collectConstants: time 0.004334/1.01, allocations: 0.7492 MB / 1.113 GB, free: 9.059 MB / 0.8419 GB
Notification: Performance of NFFlatten.collectFunctions: time 0.01116/1.021, allocations: 3.217 MB / 1.116 GB, free: 8.469 MB / 0.8419 GB
Notification: Performance of NFScalarize.scalarize: time 0.00646/1.027, allocations: 3.002 MB / 1.119 GB, free: 7.172 MB / 0.8419 GB
Notification: Performance of NFVerifyModel.verify: time 0.0157/1.043, allocations: 4.747 MB / 1.124 GB, free: 4.25 MB / 0.8419 GB
Notification: Performance of NFConvertDAE.convert: time 0.02809/1.071, allocations: 15.43 MB / 1.139 GB, free: 13.13 MB / 0.8575 GB
Notification: Performance of FrontEnd - DAE generated: time 5.821e-06/1.071, allocations: 4 kB / 1.139 GB, free: 13.12 MB / 0.8575 GB
Notification: Performance of FrontEnd: time 1.373e-06/1.071, allocations: 0 / 1.139 GB, free: 13.12 MB / 0.8575 GB
Notification: Performance of Transformations before backend: time 0.0004804/1.072, allocations: 2.125 kB / 1.139 GB, free: 13.12 MB / 0.8575 GB
Notification: Model statistics after passing the front-end and creating the data structures used by the back-end:
 * Number of equations: 866
 * Number of variables: 866
Notification: Performance of Generate backend data structure: time 0.03637/1.108, allocations: 11.49 MB / 1.15 GB, free: 6.039 MB / 0.8575 GB
Notification: Performance of prepare preOptimizeDAE: time 5.229e-05/1.108, allocations: 13.72 kB / 1.15 GB, free: 6.035 MB / 0.8575 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt normalInlineFunction (simulation): time 0.004759/1.113, allocations: 0.8771 MB / 1.151 GB, free: 5.41 MB / 0.8575 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt evaluateParameters (simulation): time 0.022/1.135, allocations: 9.617 MB / 1.16 GB, free: 11.91 MB / 0.8731 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt simplifyIfEquations (simulation): time 0.000302/1.135, allocations: 334.8 kB / 1.161 GB, free: 11.58 MB / 0.8731 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt expandDerOperator (simulation): time 0.001757/1.137, allocations: 479.8 kB / 1.161 GB, free: 11.11 MB / 0.8731 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt clockPartitioning (simulation): time 0.01034/1.147, allocations: 5.971 MB / 1.167 GB, free: 4.906 MB / 0.8731 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt findStateOrder (simulation): time 7.408e-05/1.148, allocations: 11.84 kB / 1.167 GB, free: 4.895 MB / 0.8731 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt replaceEdgeChange (simulation): time 0.0003974/1.148, allocations: 147.2 kB / 1.167 GB, free: 4.754 MB / 0.8731 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt inlineArrayEqn (simulation): time 0.0001005/1.148, allocations: 91.98 kB / 1.167 GB, free: 4.664 MB / 0.8731 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt removeEqualRHS (simulation): time 0.007982/1.156, allocations: 4.764 MB / 1.172 GB, free: 15.89 MB / 0.8887 GB
Warning: The model contains alias variables with redundant start and/or conflicting nominal values. It is recommended to resolve the conflicts, because otherwise the system could be hard to solve. To print the conflicting alias sets and the chosen candidates please use -d=aliasConflicts.
Notification: Performance of preOpt removeSimpleEquations (simulation): time 0.05882/1.215, allocations: 33.76 MB / 1.205 GB, free: 12.62 MB / 0.92 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt comSubExp (simulation): time 0.0117/1.227, allocations: 6.231 MB / 1.211 GB, free: 6.348 MB / 0.92 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt resolveLoops (simulation): time 0.003835/1.231, allocations: 2.511 MB / 1.213 GB, free: 3.832 MB / 0.92 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt evalFunc (simulation): time 0.02699/1.258, allocations: 13.24 MB / 1.226 GB, free: 6.109 MB / 0.9356 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt encapsulateWhenConditions (simulation): time 0.003256/1.261, allocations: 2.137 MB / 1.228 GB, free: 3.949 MB / 0.9356 GB
Notification: Performance of pre-optimization done (n=224): time 4.098e-06/1.261, allocations: 0 / 1.228 GB, free: 3.949 MB / 0.9356 GB
Notification: Performance of matching and sorting (n=232): time 0.02835/1.289, allocations: 14.01 MB / 1.242 GB, free: 5.754 MB / 0.9512 GB
Notification: Performance of inlineWhenForInitialization (initialization): time 8.094e-05/1.289, allocations: 128.8 kB / 1.242 GB, free: 5.605 MB / 0.9512 GB
Notification: Performance of selectInitializationVariablesDAE (initialization): time 0.02138/1.311, allocations: 10.42 MB / 1.252 GB, free: 11.19 MB / 0.9669 GB
Notification: Performance of collectPreVariables (initialization): time 0.001442/1.312, allocations: 117.7 kB / 1.253 GB, free: 11.07 MB / 0.9669 GB
Notification: Performance of collectInitialEqns (initialization): time 0.006184/1.318, allocations: 3.311 MB / 1.256 GB, free: 7.766 MB / 0.9669 GB
Notification: Performance of collectInitialBindings (initialization): time 0.002407/1.321, allocations: 0.8679 MB / 1.257 GB, free: 6.906 MB / 0.9669 GB
Notification: Performance of simplifyInitialFunctions (initialization): time 0.00261/1.323, allocations: 1.213 MB / 1.258 GB, free: 5.684 MB / 0.9669 GB
Notification: Performance of setup shared object (initialization): time 8.979e-05/1.324, allocations: 301.1 kB / 1.258 GB, free: 5.387 MB / 0.9669 GB
Notification: Performance of preBalanceInitialSystem (initialization): time 0.005427/1.329, allocations: 3.443 MB / 1.261 GB, free: 1.926 MB / 0.9669 GB
Notification: Performance of partitionIndependentBlocks (initialization): time 0.007825/1.337, allocations: 5.932 MB / 1.267 GB, free: 10.8 MB / 0.9825 GB
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3]))
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3]))
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3]))
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]))
Notification: Performance of analyzeInitialSystem (initialization): time 0.06449/1.401, allocations: 36.66 MB / 1.303 GB, free: 4.719 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of solveInitialSystemEqSystem (initialization): time 7.483e-05/1.401, allocations: 24 kB / 1.303 GB, free: 4.695 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of matching and sorting (n=659) (initialization): time 0.02175/1.423, allocations: 10.08 MB / 1.313 GB, free: 10.54 MB / 1.029 GB
Notification: Performance of prepare postOptimizeDAE: time 9.99e-05/1.423, allocations: 73.7 kB / 1.313 GB, free: 10.46 MB / 1.029 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyComplexFunction (initialization): time 0.0001253/1.424, allocations: 84 kB / 1.313 GB, free: 10.38 MB / 1.029 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt tearingSystem (initialization): time 0.001843/1.425, allocations: 0.7088 MB / 1.314 GB, free: 9.645 MB / 1.029 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt solveSimpleEquations (initialization): time 0.005821/1.431, allocations: 1.478 MB / 1.315 GB, free: 8.164 MB / 1.029 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt calculateStrongComponentJacobians (initialization): time 0.01317/1.444, allocations: 14.51 MB / 1.329 GB, free: 8.699 MB / 1.045 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyAllExpressions (initialization): time 0.01103/1.455, allocations: 1.185 MB / 1.33 GB, free: 7.512 MB / 1.045 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt collapseArrayExpressions (initialization): time 0.001646/1.457, allocations: 272 kB / 1.331 GB, free: 7.246 MB / 1.045 GB
Warning: The initial conditions are over specified. The following 8 initial equations are redundant, so they are removed from the initialization system:
         sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start
         sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start
         sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start
         sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start
         sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3])
         sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3])
         sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3])
         sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]).
Notification: Performance of preBalanceInitialSystem (initialization_lambda0): time 0.01351/1.471, allocations: 7.092 MB / 1.338 GB, free: 140 kB / 1.045 GB
Notification: Performance of partitionIndependentBlocks (initialization_lambda0): time 0.008572/1.479, allocations: 5.93 MB / 1.343 GB, free: 9.008 MB / 1.061 GB
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3]))
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3]))
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3]))
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]))
Notification: Performance of analyzeInitialSystem (initialization_lambda0): time 0.0644/1.544, allocations: 36.58 MB / 1.379 GB, free: 3.012 MB / 1.092 GB
Notification: Performance of solveInitialSystemEqSystem (initialization_lambda0): time 9.038e-05/1.544, allocations: 24 kB / 1.379 GB, free: 2.988 MB / 1.092 GB
Notification: Performance of matching and sorting (n=659) (initialization_lambda0): time 0.02158/1.565, allocations: 10.07 MB / 1.389 GB, free: 8.836 MB / 1.107 GB
Notification: Performance of prepare postOptimizeDAE: time 0.0001014/1.566, allocations: 65.7 kB / 1.389 GB, free: 8.766 MB / 1.107 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyComplexFunction (initialization): time 0.000135/1.566, allocations: 87.94 kB / 1.389 GB, free: 8.68 MB / 1.107 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt tearingSystem (initialization): time 0.001759/1.568, allocations: 0.713 MB / 1.39 GB, free: 7.945 MB / 1.107 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt solveSimpleEquations (initialization): time 0.005826/1.573, allocations: 1.478 MB / 1.391 GB, free: 6.465 MB / 1.107 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt calculateStrongComponentJacobians (initialization): time 0.01201/1.585, allocations: 14.52 MB / 1.406 GB, free: 6.98 MB / 1.123 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyAllExpressions (initialization): time 0.01007/1.595, allocations: 1.182 MB / 1.407 GB, free: 5.797 MB / 1.123 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt collapseArrayExpressions (initialization): time 0.001448/1.597, allocations: 276 kB / 1.407 GB, free: 5.527 MB / 1.123 GB
Warning: The initial conditions are over specified. The following 8 initial equations are redundant, so they are removed from the initialization_lambda0 system:
         sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start
         sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start
         sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start
         sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start
         sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3])
         sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3])
         sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3])
         sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]).
Notification: Model statistics after passing the back-end for initialization:
 * Number of independent subsystems: 384
 * Number of states: 0 ()
 * Number of discrete variables: 5 ($PRE.pulse.count,$PRE.pulse.T_start,pulse.count,pulse.T_start,$whenCondition1)
 * Number of discrete states: 0 ()
 * Number of clocked states: 0 ()
 * Top-level inputs: 0
Notification: Strong component statistics for initialization (635):
 * Single equations (assignments): 627
 * Array equations: 0
 * Algorithm blocks: 1
 * Record equations: 0
 * When equations: 0
 * If-equations: 0
 * Equation systems (not torn): 0
 * Torn equation systems: 7
 * Mixed (continuous/discrete) equation systems: 0
Notification: Torn system details for strict tearing set:
 * Linear torn systems (#iteration vars, #inner vars, density): 7 systems
   {(1,9,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,9,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%)}
 * Non-linear torn systems (#iteration vars, #inner vars): 0 systems
Notification: Performance of prepare postOptimizeDAE: time 0.001773/1.599, allocations: 0.7626 MB / 1.408 GB, free: 4.758 MB / 1.123 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt lateInlineFunction (simulation): time 0.002628/1.601, allocations: 0.6595 MB / 1.408 GB, free: 4.09 MB / 1.123 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt wrapFunctionCalls (simulation): time 0.009125/1.611, allocations: 5.146 MB / 1.413 GB, free: 14.91 MB / 1.139 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt inlineArrayEqn (simulation): time 3.107e-05/1.611, allocations: 27.98 kB / 1.413 GB, free: 14.88 MB / 1.139 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt constantLinearSystem (simulation): time 1.135e-05/1.611, allocations: 4 kB / 1.413 GB, free: 14.88 MB / 1.139 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifysemiLinear (simulation): time 0.005757/1.616, allocations: 3.97 MB / 1.417 GB, free: 10.88 MB / 1.139 GB
Warning: The model contains alias variables with redundant start and/or conflicting nominal values. It is recommended to resolve the conflicts, because otherwise the system could be hard to solve. To print the conflicting alias sets and the chosen candidates please use -d=aliasConflicts.
Notification: Performance of postOpt removeSimpleEquations (simulation): time 0.02844/1.645, allocations: 13.41 MB / 1.43 GB, free: 13.29 MB / 1.154 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyComplexFunction (simulation): time 1.413e-05/1.645, allocations: 4 kB / 1.43 GB, free: 13.29 MB / 1.154 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt solveSimpleEquations (simulation): time 0.002544/1.647, allocations: 0.6085 MB / 1.431 GB, free: 12.68 MB / 1.154 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt tearingSystem (simulation): time 0.001555/1.649, allocations: 0.5755 MB / 1.431 GB, free: 12.08 MB / 1.154 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt inputDerivativesUsed (simulation): time 0.000378/1.649, allocations: 139.9 kB / 1.432 GB, free: 11.95 MB / 1.154 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt calculateStrongComponentJacobians (simulation): time 0.0117/1.661, allocations: 14.37 MB / 1.446 GB, free: 12.6 MB / 1.17 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt calculateStateSetsJacobians (simulation): time 5.34e-06/1.661, allocations: 4 kB / 1.446 GB, free: 12.6 MB / 1.17 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt symbolicJacobian (simulation): time 0.01255/1.674, allocations: 7.127 MB / 1.453 GB, free: 5.387 MB / 1.17 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt removeConstants (simulation): time 0.00624/1.68, allocations: 1.664 MB / 1.454 GB, free: 3.695 MB / 1.17 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyTimeIndepFuncCalls (simulation): time 0.002669/1.683, allocations: 123.9 kB / 1.454 GB, free: 3.574 MB / 1.17 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyAllExpressions (simulation): time 0.005777/1.689, allocations: 0.6202 MB / 1.455 GB, free: 2.953 MB / 1.17 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt findZeroCrossings (simulation): time 0.0006202/1.689, allocations: 165.7 kB / 1.455 GB, free: 2.793 MB / 1.17 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt collapseArrayExpressions (simulation): time 0.0002701/1.689, allocations: 91.95 kB / 1.455 GB, free: 2.703 MB / 1.17 GB
Notification: Performance of sorting global known variables: time 0.0158/1.705, allocations: 7.335 MB / 1.462 GB, free: 11.38 MB / 1.186 GB
Notification: Performance of sort global known variables: time 6.41e-07/1.705, allocations: 0 / 1.462 GB, free: 11.38 MB / 1.186 GB
Notification: Performance of remove unused functions: time 0.01821/1.723, allocations: 3.961 MB / 1.466 GB, free: 7.418 MB / 1.186 GB
Notification: Model statistics after passing the back-end for simulation:
 * Number of independent subsystems: 12
 * Number of states: 43 (sla.vol[1].dynBal.U,sla.vol[2].dynBal.U,sla.vol[3].dynBal.U,sla.vol[4].dynBal.U,sla.vol[5].dynBal.U,sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_b[1].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[2].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[3].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[4].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[5].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T[3],TOut.T)
 * Number of discrete variables: 3 ($whenCondition1,pulse.T_start,pulse.count)
 * Number of discrete states: 1 (pulse.count)
 * Number of clocked states: 0 ()
 * Top-level inputs: 0
Notification: Strong component statistics for simulation (210):
 * Single equations (assignments): 199
 * Array equations: 0
 * Algorithm blocks: 0
 * Record equations: 2
 * When equations: 2
 * If-equations: 0
 * Equation systems (not torn): 0
 * Torn equation systems: 7
 * Mixed (continuous/discrete) equation systems: 0
Notification: Torn system details for strict tearing set:
 * Linear torn systems (#iteration vars, #inner vars, density): 7 systems
   {(1,9,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,9,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%)}
 * Non-linear torn systems (#iteration vars, #inner vars): 0 systems
Notification: Performance of Backend phase and start with SimCode phase: time 0.002073/1.726, allocations: 0.5934 MB / 1.467 GB, free: 6.852 MB / 1.186 GB
Notification: Performance of simCode: created initialization part: time 0.02308/1.749, allocations: 13.43 MB / 1.48 GB, free: 9.238 MB / 1.201 GB
Notification: Performance of simCode: created event and clocks part: time 1.279e-05/1.749, allocations: 4 kB / 1.48 GB, free: 9.234 MB / 1.201 GB
Notification: Performance of simCode: created simulation system equations: time 0.005024/1.754, allocations: 3.044 MB / 1.483 GB, free: 6.094 MB / 1.201 GB
Notification: Performance of simCode: created of all other equations (e.g. parameter, nominal, assert, etc): time 0.01712/1.771, allocations: 2.938 MB / 1.486 GB, free: 3.207 MB / 1.201 GB
Notification: Performance of simCode: created linear, non-linear and system jacobian parts: time 0.03479/1.806, allocations: 18.77 MB / 1.504 GB, free: 408 kB / 1.217 GB
Notification: Performance of simCode: some other stuff during SimCode phase: time 0.008896/1.815, allocations: 5.373 MB / 1.509 GB, free: 10.98 MB / 1.232 GB
Notification: Performance of simCode: alias equations: time 0.01546/1.83, allocations: 6.419 MB / 1.516 GB, free: 4.574 MB / 1.232 GB
Notification: Performance of simCode: all other stuff during SimCode phase: time 0.003087/1.833, allocations: 427.4 kB / 1.516 GB, free: 4.156 MB / 1.232 GB
Notification: Performance of SimCode: time 2.505e-06/1.833, allocations: 4 kB / 1.516 GB, free: 4.152 MB / 1.232 GB
Notification: Performance of Templates: time 0.7127/2.546, allocations: 136 MB / 1.649 GB, free: 357.7 MB / 1.248 GB
make -j1 -f Buildings_latest_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.makefile
(rm -f Buildings_latest_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.pipe ; mkfifo Buildings_latest_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.pipe ; head -c 1048576 < Buildings_latest_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.pipe >> ../files/Buildings_latest_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.sim & ./Buildings_latest_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU  -abortSlowSimulation -alarm=480 -s cvode -emit_protected -lv LOG_STATS > Buildings_latest_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.pipe 2>&1)
diffSimulationResults("Buildings_latest_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU_res.mat","/mnt/ReferenceFiles/Buildings/csv/master/Buildings_Fluid_HeatExchangers_RadiantSlabs_Examples_StepResponseEpsilonNTU.csv","/var/lib/jenkins1/ws/OpenModelicaLibraryTestingWork/OpenModelicaLibraryTesting/files/Buildings_latest_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.diff",relTol=0.003,relTolDiffMinMax=0.003,rangeDelta=0.001)
Reference file matches