Running: ./testmodel.py --libraries=/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries --ompython_omhome=/usr Buildings_9_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.conf.json
loadFile("/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/ModelicaServices 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo", uses=false)
loadFile("/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Complex 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo", uses=false)
loadFile("/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Modelica 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo", uses=false)
loadFile("/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Buildings 9.1.2-maint.9.1.x/package.mo", uses=false)
Using package Buildings with version 9.1.2 (/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Buildings 9.1.2-maint.9.1.x/package.mo)
Using package Modelica with version 4.0.0 (/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Modelica 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo)
Using package Complex with version 4.0.0 (/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Complex 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo)
Using package ModelicaServices with version 4.0.0 (/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/ModelicaServices 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo)
Running command: translateModel(Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU,tolerance=1e-06,outputFormat="mat",numberOfIntervals=5000,variableFilter="time|sla.sta_b.T|sla.surf_a.T|sla.surf_b.T|sla.surf_a.Q_flow|sla.surf_b.Q_flow",fileNamePrefix="Buildings_9_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU")
translateModel(Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU,tolerance=1e-06,outputFormat="mat",numberOfIntervals=5000,variableFilter="time|sla.sta_b.T|sla.surf_a.T|sla.surf_b.T|sla.surf_a.Q_flow|sla.surf_b.Q_flow",fileNamePrefix="Buildings_9_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU")
Notification: Performance of loadFile(/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/ModelicaServices 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo): time 0.001479/0.001479, allocations: 110.9 kB / 16.37 MB, free: 6.469 MB / 14.72 MB
Notification: Performance of loadFile(/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Complex 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo): time 0.001599/0.001599, allocations: 189.9 kB / 17.3 MB, free: 5.828 MB / 14.72 MB
Notification: Performance of loadFile(/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Modelica 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo): time 1.374/1.374, allocations: 222.9 MB / 241 MB, free: 15.19 MB / 206.1 MB
Notification: Performance of loadFile(/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Buildings 9.1.2-maint.9.1.x/package.mo): time 2.205/2.205, allocations: 390.3 MB / 0.6655 GB, free: 0.6094 MB / 0.5294 GB
Notification: Performance of FrontEnd - loaded program: time 0.001335/0.001335, allocations: 67.34 kB / 0.814 GB, free: 32.63 MB / 0.6231 GB
Notification: Performance of FrontEnd - Absyn->SCode: time 0.3021/0.3035, allocations: 140.4 MB / 0.9511 GB, free: 8.078 MB / 0.7325 GB
Notification: Performance of NFInst.instantiate(Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU): time 0.03391/0.3374, allocations: 31.76 MB / 0.9821 GB, free: 8.195 MB / 0.7637 GB
Notification: Performance of NFInst.instExpressions: time 0.0199/0.3574, allocations: 12.28 MB / 0.9941 GB, free: 11.87 MB / 0.7794 GB
Notification: Performance of NFInst.updateImplicitVariability: time 0.003224/0.3607, allocations: 59.69 kB / 0.9942 GB, free: 11.81 MB / 0.7794 GB
Notification: Performance of NFTyping.typeComponents: time 0.00382/0.3645, allocations: 1.107 MB / 0.9953 GB, free: 10.7 MB / 0.7794 GB
Notification: Performance of NFTyping.typeBindings: time 0.007098/0.3717, allocations: 2.092 MB / 0.9973 GB, free: 8.602 MB / 0.7794 GB
Notification: Performance of NFTyping.typeClassSections: time 0.006344/0.3781, allocations: 1.853 MB / 0.9991 GB, free: 6.754 MB / 0.7794 GB
Notification: Performance of NFFlatten.flatten: time 0.02272/0.4008, allocations: 19.55 MB / 1.018 GB, free: 3.156 MB / 0.795 GB
Notification: Performance of NFFlatten.resolveConnections: time 0.009978/0.4108, allocations: 7.197 MB / 1.025 GB, free: 11.89 MB / 0.8106 GB
Notification: Performance of NFEvalConstants.evaluate: time 0.01251/0.4234, allocations: 6.475 MB / 1.032 GB, free: 5.418 MB / 0.8106 GB
Notification: Performance of NFSimplifyModel.simplify: time 0.009915/0.4333, allocations: 5.344 MB / 1.037 GB, free: 56 kB / 0.8106 GB
Notification: Performance of NFPackage.collectConstants: time 0.003022/0.4364, allocations: 0.75 MB / 1.038 GB, free: 15.3 MB / 0.8262 GB
Notification: Performance of NFFlatten.collectFunctions: time 0.01035/0.4468, allocations: 3.215 MB / 1.041 GB, free: 12.09 MB / 0.8262 GB
Notification: Performance of NFScalarize.scalarize: time 0.005883/0.4527, allocations: 3 MB / 1.044 GB, free: 9.078 MB / 0.8262 GB
Notification: Performance of NFVerifyModel.verify: time 0.01062/0.4633, allocations: 4.756 MB / 1.048 GB, free: 4.301 MB / 0.8262 GB
Notification: Performance of NFConvertDAE.convert: time 0.02163/0.485, allocations: 15.43 MB / 1.063 GB, free: 4.828 MB / 0.8419 GB
Notification: Performance of FrontEnd - DAE generated: time 8.316e-06/0.4851, allocations: 0 / 1.063 GB, free: 4.828 MB / 0.8419 GB
Notification: Performance of FrontEnd: time 2.134e-06/0.4851, allocations: 0 / 1.063 GB, free: 4.828 MB / 0.8419 GB
Notification: Performance of Transformations before backend: time 0.000521/0.4856, allocations: 0 / 1.063 GB, free: 4.828 MB / 0.8419 GB
Notification: Model statistics after passing the front-end and creating the data structures used by the back-end:
 * Number of equations: 866
 * Number of variables: 866
Notification: Performance of Generate backend data structure: time 0.03465/0.5203, allocations: 11.49 MB / 1.075 GB, free: 9.23 MB / 0.8575 GB
Notification: Performance of prepare preOptimizeDAE: time 4.874e-05/0.5203, allocations: 12.03 kB / 1.075 GB, free: 9.219 MB / 0.8575 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt normalInlineFunction (simulation): time 0.004526/0.5249, allocations: 0.8765 MB / 1.075 GB, free: 8.332 MB / 0.8575 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt evaluateParameters (simulation): time 0.6698/1.195, allocations: 9.613 MB / 1.085 GB, free: 115.5 MB / 0.8575 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt simplifyIfEquations (simulation): time 0.00041/1.195, allocations: 332.6 kB / 1.085 GB, free: 115.4 MB / 0.8575 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt expandDerOperator (simulation): time 0.002059/1.197, allocations: 482.7 kB / 1.086 GB, free: 115.2 MB / 0.8575 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt clockPartitioning (simulation): time 0.01379/1.211, allocations: 5.968 MB / 1.091 GB, free: 112.9 MB / 0.8575 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt findStateOrder (simulation): time 0.000103/1.211, allocations: 13 kB / 1.091 GB, free: 112.9 MB / 0.8575 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt replaceEdgeChange (simulation): time 0.0004915/1.212, allocations: 146.2 kB / 1.092 GB, free: 112.8 MB / 0.8575 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt inlineArrayEqn (simulation): time 0.000164/1.212, allocations: 100.8 kB / 1.092 GB, free: 112.8 MB / 0.8575 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt removeEqualRHS (simulation): time 0.01033/1.222, allocations: 4.759 MB / 1.096 GB, free: 111.4 MB / 0.8575 GB
Warning: The model contains alias variables with redundant start and/or conflicting nominal values. It is recommended to resolve the conflicts, because otherwise the system could be hard to solve. To print the conflicting alias sets and the chosen candidates please use -d=aliasConflicts.
Notification: Performance of preOpt removeSimpleEquations (simulation): time 0.06011/1.282, allocations: 33.76 MB / 1.129 GB, free: 91.11 MB / 0.8575 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt comSubExp (simulation): time 0.01353/1.296, allocations: 6.22 MB / 1.135 GB, free: 87.76 MB / 0.8575 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt resolveLoops (simulation): time 0.004572/1.3, allocations: 2.503 MB / 1.138 GB, free: 86.56 MB / 0.8575 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt evalFunc (simulation): time 0.0253/1.326, allocations: 13.23 MB / 1.151 GB, free: 77.37 MB / 0.8575 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt encapsulateWhenConditions (simulation): time 0.002817/1.329, allocations: 2.136 MB / 1.153 GB, free: 76.18 MB / 0.8575 GB
Notification: Performance of pre-optimization done (n=224): time 5.38e-06/1.329, allocations: 0 / 1.153 GB, free: 76.18 MB / 0.8575 GB
Notification: Performance of matching and sorting (n=232): time 0.0258/1.355, allocations: 14.02 MB / 1.166 GB, free: 65.02 MB / 0.8575 GB
Notification: Performance of inlineWhenForInitialization (initialization): time 6.013e-05/1.355, allocations: 132.8 kB / 1.167 GB, free: 64.87 MB / 0.8575 GB
Notification: Performance of selectInitializationVariablesDAE (initialization): time 0.01701/1.372, allocations: 10.42 MB / 1.177 GB, free: 54.46 MB / 0.8575 GB
Notification: Performance of collectPreVariables (initialization): time 0.001111/1.373, allocations: 122.2 kB / 1.177 GB, free: 54.34 MB / 0.8575 GB
Notification: Performance of collectInitialEqns (initialization): time 0.004014/1.377, allocations: 3.306 MB / 1.18 GB, free: 51.04 MB / 0.8575 GB
Notification: Performance of collectInitialBindings (initialization): time 0.001977/1.379, allocations: 0.8654 MB / 1.181 GB, free: 50.18 MB / 0.8575 GB
Notification: Performance of simplifyInitialFunctions (initialization): time 0.002068/1.381, allocations: 1.213 MB / 1.182 GB, free: 48.95 MB / 0.8575 GB
Notification: Performance of setup shared object (initialization): time 4.582e-05/1.381, allocations: 305.1 kB / 1.182 GB, free: 48.65 MB / 0.8575 GB
Notification: Performance of preBalanceInitialSystem (initialization): time 0.003899/1.385, allocations: 3.447 MB / 1.186 GB, free: 45.19 MB / 0.8575 GB
Notification: Performance of partitionIndependentBlocks (initialization): time 0.005352/1.39, allocations: 5.937 MB / 1.192 GB, free: 38.05 MB / 0.8575 GB
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3]))
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3]))
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3]))
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]))
Notification: Performance of analyzeInitialSystem (initialization): time 0.04997/1.44, allocations: 36.64 MB / 1.227 GB, free: 15.97 MB / 0.8731 GB
Notification: Performance of solveInitialSystemEqSystem (initialization): time 8.305e-05/1.44, allocations: 24 kB / 1.227 GB, free: 15.95 MB / 0.8731 GB
Notification: Performance of matching and sorting (n=659) (initialization): time 0.02067/1.461, allocations: 10.07 MB / 1.237 GB, free: 5.789 MB / 0.8731 GB
Notification: Performance of prepare postOptimizeDAE: time 0.0001235/1.461, allocations: 69.7 kB / 1.237 GB, free: 5.715 MB / 0.8731 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyComplexFunction (initialization): time 0.000144/1.461, allocations: 84 kB / 1.237 GB, free: 5.633 MB / 0.8731 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt tearingSystem (initialization): time 0.001812/1.463, allocations: 0.7102 MB / 1.238 GB, free: 4.902 MB / 0.8731 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt solveSimpleEquations (initialization): time 0.00576/1.469, allocations: 1.482 MB / 1.24 GB, free: 3.418 MB / 0.8731 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt calculateStrongComponentJacobians (initialization): time 0.01474/1.484, allocations: 14.53 MB / 1.254 GB, free: 3.941 MB / 0.8887 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyAllExpressions (initialization): time 0.01007/1.494, allocations: 1.182 MB / 1.255 GB, free: 2.758 MB / 0.8887 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt collapseArrayExpressions (initialization): time 0.001438/1.495, allocations: 276 kB / 1.255 GB, free: 2.488 MB / 0.8887 GB
Warning: The initial conditions are over specified. The following 8 initial equations are redundant, so they are removed from the initialization system:
         sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start
         sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start
         sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start
         sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start
         sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3])
         sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3])
         sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3])
         sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]).
Notification: Performance of preBalanceInitialSystem (initialization_lambda0): time 0.01638/1.512, allocations: 7.085 MB / 1.262 GB, free: 11.39 MB / 0.9044 GB
Notification: Performance of partitionIndependentBlocks (initialization_lambda0): time 0.008458/1.52, allocations: 5.932 MB / 1.268 GB, free: 4.25 MB / 0.9044 GB
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3]))
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3]))
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3]))
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]))
Notification: Performance of analyzeInitialSystem (initialization_lambda0): time 0.06235/1.583, allocations: 36.57 MB / 1.304 GB, free: 14.24 MB / 0.9512 GB
Notification: Performance of solveInitialSystemEqSystem (initialization_lambda0): time 9.267e-05/1.583, allocations: 24.38 kB / 1.304 GB, free: 14.21 MB / 0.9512 GB
Notification: Performance of matching and sorting (n=659) (initialization_lambda0): time 0.02213/1.605, allocations: 10.08 MB / 1.313 GB, free: 4.051 MB / 0.9512 GB
Notification: Performance of prepare postOptimizeDAE: time 0.0002444/1.605, allocations: 66.64 kB / 1.313 GB, free: 3.98 MB / 0.9512 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyComplexFunction (initialization): time 0.0002503/1.605, allocations: 84 kB / 1.314 GB, free: 3.898 MB / 0.9512 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt tearingSystem (initialization): time 0.002518/1.608, allocations: 0.7161 MB / 1.314 GB, free: 3.16 MB / 0.9512 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt solveSimpleEquations (initialization): time 0.006896/1.615, allocations: 1.478 MB / 1.316 GB, free: 1.68 MB / 0.9512 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt calculateStrongComponentJacobians (initialization): time 0.01561/1.63, allocations: 14.51 MB / 1.33 GB, free: 2.219 MB / 0.9669 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyAllExpressions (initialization): time 0.01102/1.642, allocations: 1.178 MB / 1.331 GB, free: 1.039 MB / 0.9669 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt collapseArrayExpressions (initialization): time 0.001613/1.643, allocations: 276 kB / 1.331 GB, free: 0.7695 MB / 0.9669 GB
Warning: The initial conditions are over specified. The following 8 initial equations are redundant, so they are removed from the initialization_lambda0 system:
         sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start
         sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start
         sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start
         sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start
         sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3])
         sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3])
         sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3])
         sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]).
Notification: Model statistics after passing the back-end for initialization:
 * Number of independent subsystems: 384
 * Number of states: 0 ()
 * Number of discrete variables: 5 ($PRE.pulse.count,$PRE.pulse.T_start,pulse.count,pulse.T_start,$whenCondition1)
 * Number of discrete states: 0 ()
 * Number of clocked states: 0 ()
 * Top-level inputs: 0
Notification: Strong component statistics for initialization (635):
 * Single equations (assignments): 627
 * Array equations: 0
 * Algorithm blocks: 1
 * Record equations: 0
 * When equations: 0
 * If-equations: 0
 * Equation systems (not torn): 0
 * Torn equation systems: 7
 * Mixed (continuous/discrete) equation systems: 0
Notification: Torn system details for strict tearing set:
 * Linear torn systems (#iteration vars, #inner vars, density): 7 systems
   {(1,9,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,9,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%)}
 * Non-linear torn systems (#iteration vars, #inner vars): 0 systems
Notification: Performance of prepare postOptimizeDAE: time 0.002754/1.646, allocations: 0.7773 MB / 1.332 GB, free: 15.99 MB / 0.9825 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt lateInlineFunction (simulation): time 0.003121/1.649, allocations: 0.6595 MB / 1.333 GB, free: 15.32 MB / 0.9825 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt wrapFunctionCalls (simulation): time 0.0108/1.66, allocations: 5.141 MB / 1.338 GB, free: 10.15 MB / 0.9825 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt inlineArrayEqn (simulation): time 2.943e-05/1.66, allocations: 24 kB / 1.338 GB, free: 10.13 MB / 0.9825 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt constantLinearSystem (simulation): time 1.333e-05/1.66, allocations: 11.88 kB / 1.338 GB, free: 10.12 MB / 0.9825 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifysemiLinear (simulation): time 0.005625/1.666, allocations: 3.966 MB / 1.342 GB, free: 6.121 MB / 0.9825 GB
Warning: The model contains alias variables with redundant start and/or conflicting nominal values. It is recommended to resolve the conflicts, because otherwise the system could be hard to solve. To print the conflicting alias sets and the chosen candidates please use -d=aliasConflicts.
Notification: Performance of postOpt removeSimpleEquations (simulation): time 0.02909/1.695, allocations: 13.41 MB / 1.355 GB, free: 8.531 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyComplexFunction (simulation): time 1.502e-05/1.695, allocations: 6.625 kB / 1.355 GB, free: 8.527 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt solveSimpleEquations (simulation): time 0.002446/1.697, allocations: 0.6007 MB / 1.355 GB, free: 7.926 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt tearingSystem (simulation): time 0.001462/1.699, allocations: 0.5757 MB / 1.356 GB, free: 7.328 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt inputDerivativesUsed (simulation): time 0.0002905/1.699, allocations: 139.9 kB / 1.356 GB, free: 7.191 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt calculateStrongComponentJacobians (simulation): time 0.01195/1.711, allocations: 14.38 MB / 1.37 GB, free: 7.844 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt calculateStateSetsJacobians (simulation): time 7.014e-06/1.711, allocations: 12.09 kB / 1.37 GB, free: 7.832 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt symbolicJacobian (simulation): time 0.01217/1.723, allocations: 7.113 MB / 1.377 GB, free: 0.6367 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt removeConstants (simulation): time 0.006652/1.73, allocations: 1.673 MB / 1.379 GB, free: 14.94 MB / 1.029 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyTimeIndepFuncCalls (simulation): time 0.00276/1.733, allocations: 123.9 kB / 1.379 GB, free: 14.82 MB / 1.029 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyAllExpressions (simulation): time 0.006066/1.739, allocations: 0.6086 MB / 1.379 GB, free: 14.21 MB / 1.029 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt findZeroCrossings (simulation): time 0.0006638/1.74, allocations: 169.7 kB / 1.38 GB, free: 14.04 MB / 1.029 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt collapseArrayExpressions (simulation): time 0.0002729/1.74, allocations: 83.95 kB / 1.38 GB, free: 13.96 MB / 1.029 GB
Notification: Performance of sorting global known variables: time 0.01806/1.758, allocations: 7.335 MB / 1.387 GB, free: 6.633 MB / 1.029 GB
Notification: Performance of sort global known variables: time 1.062e-06/1.758, allocations: 3.938 kB / 1.387 GB, free: 6.629 MB / 1.029 GB
Notification: Performance of remove unused functions: time 0.02116/1.779, allocations: 3.962 MB / 1.391 GB, free: 2.695 MB / 1.029 GB
Notification: Model statistics after passing the back-end for simulation:
 * Number of independent subsystems: 12
 * Number of states: 43 (sla.vol[1].dynBal.U,sla.vol[2].dynBal.U,sla.vol[3].dynBal.U,sla.vol[4].dynBal.U,sla.vol[5].dynBal.U,sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_b[1].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[2].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[3].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[4].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[5].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T[3],TOut.T)
 * Number of discrete variables: 3 ($whenCondition1,pulse.T_start,pulse.count)
 * Number of discrete states: 1 (pulse.count)
 * Number of clocked states: 0 ()
 * Top-level inputs: 0
Notification: Strong component statistics for simulation (210):
 * Single equations (assignments): 199
 * Array equations: 0
 * Algorithm blocks: 0
 * Record equations: 2
 * When equations: 2
 * If-equations: 0
 * Equation systems (not torn): 0
 * Torn equation systems: 7
 * Mixed (continuous/discrete) equation systems: 0
Notification: Torn system details for strict tearing set:
 * Linear torn systems (#iteration vars, #inner vars, density): 7 systems
   {(1,9,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,9,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%)}
 * Non-linear torn systems (#iteration vars, #inner vars): 0 systems
Notification: Performance of Backend phase and start with SimCode phase: time 0.002386/1.782, allocations: 0.5903 MB / 1.391 GB, free: 2.152 MB / 1.029 GB
Notification: Performance of simCode: created initialization part: time 0.02401/1.806, allocations: 13.44 MB / 1.404 GB, free: 4.543 MB / 1.045 GB
Notification: Performance of simCode: created event and clocks part: time 1.505e-05/1.806, allocations: 4 kB / 1.404 GB, free: 4.539 MB / 1.045 GB
Notification: Performance of simCode: created simulation system equations: time 0.00513/1.811, allocations: 3.042 MB / 1.407 GB, free: 1.406 MB / 1.045 GB
Notification: Performance of simCode: created of all other equations (e.g. parameter, nominal, assert, etc): time 0.01837/1.829, allocations: 2.943 MB / 1.41 GB, free: 14.52 MB / 1.061 GB
Notification: Performance of simCode: created linear, non-linear and system jacobian parts: time 0.03705/1.866, allocations: 18.76 MB / 1.429 GB, free: 11.71 MB / 1.076 GB
Notification: Performance of simCode: some other stuff during SimCode phase: time 0.009004/1.875, allocations: 5.369 MB / 1.434 GB, free: 6.305 MB / 1.076 GB
Notification: Performance of simCode: alias equations: time 0.01568/1.891, allocations: 6.422 MB / 1.44 GB, free: 15.89 MB / 1.092 GB
Notification: Performance of simCode: all other stuff during SimCode phase: time 0.003006/1.894, allocations: 435.3 kB / 1.44 GB, free: 15.46 MB / 1.092 GB
Notification: Performance of SimCode: time 1.182e-06/1.894, allocations: 4 kB / 1.44 GB, free: 15.46 MB / 1.092 GB
Notification: Performance of Templates: time 0.7906/2.685, allocations: 136 MB / 1.573 GB, free: 368.3 MB / 1.154 GB
make -j1 -f Buildings_9_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.makefile
(rm -f Buildings_9_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.pipe ; mkfifo Buildings_9_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.pipe ; head -c 1048576 < Buildings_9_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.pipe >> ../files/Buildings_9_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.sim & ./Buildings_9_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU  -abortSlowSimulation -alarm=480 -s cvode -emit_protected -lv LOG_STATS > Buildings_9_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.pipe 2>&1)
diffSimulationResults("Buildings_9_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU_res.mat","/mnt/ReferenceFiles/Buildings/csv/maint_9.1.x/Buildings_Fluid_HeatExchangers_RadiantSlabs_Examples_StepResponseEpsilonNTU.csv","/var/lib/jenkins1/ws/OpenModelicaLibraryTestingWork/OpenModelicaLibraryTesting/files/Buildings_9_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.diff",relTol=0.003,relTolDiffMinMax=0.003,rangeDelta=0.001)
Reference file matches