Running: ./testmodel.py --libraries=/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/ --ompython_omhome=/usr Buildings_8_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.conf.json
loadFile("/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/ModelicaServices 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo", uses=false)
loadFile("/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Complex 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo", uses=false)
loadFile("/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Modelica 3.2.3+maint.om/package.mo", uses=false)
loadFile("/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Buildings 8.1.4-maint.8.1.x/package.mo", uses=false)
Using package Buildings with version 8.1.4 (/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Buildings 8.1.4-maint.8.1.x/package.mo)
Using package Modelica with version 3.2.3 (/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Modelica 3.2.3+maint.om/package.mo)
Using package Complex with version 4.0.0 (/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Complex 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo)
Using package ModelicaServices with version 4.0.0 (/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/ModelicaServices 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo)
Running command: translateModel(Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU,tolerance=1e-06,outputFormat="empty",numberOfIntervals=5000,variableFilter="",fileNamePrefix="Buildings_8_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU")
translateModel(Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU,tolerance=1e-06,outputFormat="empty",numberOfIntervals=5000,variableFilter="",fileNamePrefix="Buildings_8_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU")
Notification: Performance of loadFile(/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/ModelicaServices 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo): time 0.001419/0.001419, allocations: 104.2 kB / 16.29 MB, free: 6.43 MB / 14.72 MB
Notification: Performance of loadFile(/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Complex 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo): time 0.00157/0.00157, allocations: 184 kB / 17.22 MB, free: 5.934 MB / 14.72 MB
Notification: Performance of loadFile(/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Modelica 3.2.3+maint.om/package.mo): time 1.551/1.551, allocations: 205.1 MB / 223.1 MB, free: 12.31 MB / 190.1 MB
Notification: Performance of loadFile(/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Buildings 8.1.4-maint.8.1.x/package.mo): time 1.899/1.899, allocations: 292.3 MB / 0.5495 GB, free: 17.61 MB / 462.1 MB
Notification: Modelica requested package Complex of version 3.2.3. Complex 4.0.0 is used instead which states that it is fully compatible without conversion script needed.
Notification: Modelica requested package ModelicaServices of version 3.2.3. ModelicaServices 4.0.0 is used instead which states that it is fully compatible without conversion script needed.
Notification: Performance of FrontEnd - loaded program: time 0.001543/0.001543, allocations: 67.91 kB / 0.6722 GB, free: 6.477 MB / 0.545 GB
Notification: Performance of FrontEnd - Absyn->SCode: time 0.2795/0.2811, allocations: 114.5 MB / 0.7841 GB, free: 3.812 MB / 0.6544 GB
Notification: Performance of NFInst.instantiate(Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU): time 0.5112/0.7923, allocations: 31.73 MB / 0.8151 GB, free: 30.44 MB / 0.6544 GB
Notification: Performance of NFInst.instExpressions: time 0.01815/0.8105, allocations: 12.22 MB / 0.827 GB, free: 21.82 MB / 0.6544 GB
Notification: Performance of NFInst.updateImplicitVariability: time 0.003105/0.8137, allocations: 56.62 kB / 0.8271 GB, free: 21.8 MB / 0.6544 GB
Notification: Performance of NFTyping.typeComponents: time 0.003709/0.8174, allocations: 1.11 MB / 0.8281 GB, free: 21.2 MB / 0.6544 GB
Notification: Performance of NFTyping.typeBindings: time 0.007258/0.8247, allocations: 2.066 MB / 0.8302 GB, free: 20 MB / 0.6544 GB
Notification: Performance of NFTyping.typeClassSections: time 0.006254/0.831, allocations: 1.849 MB / 0.832 GB, free: 19.09 MB / 0.6544 GB
Notification: Performance of NFFlatten.flatten: time 0.02373/0.8547, allocations: 19.48 MB / 0.851 GB, free: 10.94 MB / 0.6544 GB
Notification: Performance of NFFlatten.resolveConnections: time 0.01132/0.8661, allocations: 7.198 MB / 0.858 GB, free: 7.781 MB / 0.6544 GB
Notification: Performance of NFEvalConstants.evaluate: time 0.01593/0.8821, allocations: 6.454 MB / 0.8643 GB, free: 4.512 MB / 0.6544 GB
Notification: Performance of NFSimplifyModel.simplify: time 0.01424/0.8963, allocations: 5.346 MB / 0.8695 GB, free: 1.297 MB / 0.6544 GB
Notification: Performance of NFPackage.collectConstants: time 0.003742/0.9001, allocations: 0.753 MB / 0.8703 GB, free: 1.293 MB / 0.6544 GB
Notification: Performance of NFFlatten.collectFunctions: time 0.01094/0.9111, allocations: 3.215 MB / 0.8734 GB, free: 15.63 MB / 0.67 GB
Notification: Performance of NFScalarize.scalarize: time 0.005912/0.917, allocations: 3 MB / 0.8763 GB, free: 12.62 MB / 0.67 GB
Notification: Performance of NFVerifyModel.verify: time 0.01191/0.929, allocations: 4.741 MB / 0.881 GB, free: 7.859 MB / 0.67 GB
Notification: Performance of NFConvertDAE.convert: time 0.02154/0.9505, allocations: 15.4 MB / 0.896 GB, free: 8.41 MB / 0.6856 GB
Notification: Performance of FrontEnd - DAE generated: time 9.057e-06/0.9506, allocations: 7.984 kB / 0.896 GB, free: 8.402 MB / 0.6856 GB
Notification: Performance of FrontEnd: time 2.044e-06/0.9506, allocations: 0 / 0.896 GB, free: 8.402 MB / 0.6856 GB
Notification: Performance of Transformations before backend: time 0.0004403/0.9511, allocations: 0 / 0.896 GB, free: 8.402 MB / 0.6856 GB
Notification: Model statistics after passing the front-end and creating the data structures used by the back-end:
 * Number of equations: 866
 * Number of variables: 866
Notification: Performance of Generate backend data structure: time 0.03182/0.9829, allocations: 11.46 MB / 0.9072 GB, free: 12.82 MB / 0.7012 GB
Notification: Performance of prepare preOptimizeDAE: time 4.928e-05/0.9829, allocations: 10 kB / 0.9072 GB, free: 12.82 MB / 0.7012 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt normalInlineFunction (simulation): time 0.003597/0.9865, allocations: 0.8808 MB / 0.9081 GB, free: 11.93 MB / 0.7012 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt evaluateParameters (simulation): time 0.0208/1.007, allocations: 9.33 MB / 0.9172 GB, free: 2.52 MB / 0.7012 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt simplifyIfEquations (simulation): time 0.0003016/1.008, allocations: 330.8 kB / 0.9175 GB, free: 2.195 MB / 0.7012 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt expandDerOperator (simulation): time 0.001454/1.009, allocations: 491.7 kB / 0.918 GB, free: 1.715 MB / 0.7012 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt clockPartitioning (simulation): time 0.0105/1.02, allocations: 5.956 MB / 0.9238 GB, free: 11.52 MB / 0.7169 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt findStateOrder (simulation): time 7.941e-05/1.02, allocations: 11.88 kB / 0.9238 GB, free: 11.51 MB / 0.7169 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt replaceEdgeChange (simulation): time 0.0003931/1.02, allocations: 156.5 kB / 0.924 GB, free: 11.36 MB / 0.7169 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt inlineArrayEqn (simulation): time 9.799e-05/1.02, allocations: 92 kB / 0.924 GB, free: 11.27 MB / 0.7169 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt removeEqualRHS (simulation): time 0.007938/1.028, allocations: 4.758 MB / 0.9287 GB, free: 6.5 MB / 0.7169 GB
Warning: The model contains alias variables with redundant start and/or conflicting nominal values. It is recommended to resolve the conflicts, because otherwise the system could be hard to solve. To print the conflicting alias sets and the chosen candidates please use -d=aliasConflicts.
Notification: Performance of preOpt removeSimpleEquations (simulation): time 0.06777/1.096, allocations: 33.74 MB / 0.9616 GB, free: 3.105 MB / 0.7481 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt comSubExp (simulation): time 0.01263/1.109, allocations: 6.232 MB / 0.9677 GB, free: 12.77 MB / 0.7637 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt resolveLoops (simulation): time 0.00451/1.113, allocations: 2.502 MB / 0.9702 GB, free: 10.27 MB / 0.7637 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt evalFunc (simulation): time 0.02861/1.142, allocations: 13.23 MB / 0.9831 GB, free: 12.5 MB / 0.7794 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt encapsulateWhenConditions (simulation): time 0.004152/1.146, allocations: 2.136 MB / 0.9852 GB, free: 10.34 MB / 0.7794 GB
Notification: Performance of pre-optimization done (n=224): time 6.632e-06/1.146, allocations: 0 / 0.9852 GB, free: 10.34 MB / 0.7794 GB
Notification: Performance of matching and sorting (n=232): time 0.03773/1.184, allocations: 13.99 MB / 0.9988 GB, free: 12.15 MB / 0.795 GB
Notification: Performance of inlineWhenForInitialization (initialization): time 0.0001148/1.184, allocations: 140.7 kB / 0.999 GB, free: 11.99 MB / 0.795 GB
Notification: Performance of selectInitializationVariablesDAE (initialization): time 0.02422/1.208, allocations: 10.4 MB / 1.009 GB, free: 1.598 MB / 0.795 GB
Notification: Performance of collectPreVariables (initialization): time 0.00102/1.209, allocations: 117.7 kB / 1.009 GB, free: 1.477 MB / 0.795 GB
Notification: Performance of collectInitialEqns (initialization): time 0.005359/1.215, allocations: 3.281 MB / 1.012 GB, free: 14.17 MB / 0.8106 GB
Notification: Performance of collectInitialBindings (initialization): time 0.002267/1.217, allocations: 0.8746 MB / 1.013 GB, free: 13.29 MB / 0.8106 GB
Notification: Performance of simplifyInitialFunctions (initialization): time 0.003999/1.221, allocations: 1.205 MB / 1.014 GB, free: 12.07 MB / 0.8106 GB
Notification: Performance of setup shared object (initialization): time 0.0001168/1.221, allocations: 301.1 kB / 1.015 GB, free: 11.77 MB / 0.8106 GB
Notification: Performance of preBalanceInitialSystem (initialization): time 0.005857/1.227, allocations: 3.455 MB / 1.018 GB, free: 8.301 MB / 0.8106 GB
Notification: Performance of partitionIndependentBlocks (initialization): time 0.008241/1.235, allocations: 5.928 MB / 1.024 GB, free: 1.168 MB / 0.8106 GB
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3]))
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3]))
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3]))
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]))
Notification: Performance of analyzeInitialSystem (initialization): time 0.06347/1.299, allocations: 36.64 MB / 1.06 GB, free: 11.08 MB / 0.8575 GB
Notification: Performance of solveInitialSystemEqSystem (initialization): time 7.603e-05/1.299, allocations: 24.5 kB / 1.06 GB, free: 11.06 MB / 0.8575 GB
Notification: Performance of matching and sorting (n=659) (initialization): time 0.0206/1.319, allocations: 10.07 MB / 1.07 GB, free: 0.9023 MB / 0.8575 GB
Notification: Performance of prepare postOptimizeDAE: time 0.0001413/1.32, allocations: 69.7 kB / 1.07 GB, free: 0.8281 MB / 0.8575 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyComplexFunction (initialization): time 0.0001678/1.32, allocations: 87.98 kB / 1.07 GB, free: 0.7422 MB / 0.8575 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt tearingSystem (initialization): time 0.001879/1.322, allocations: 0.7159 MB / 1.07 GB, free: 8 kB / 0.8575 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt solveSimpleEquations (initialization): time 0.005452/1.327, allocations: 1.486 MB / 1.072 GB, free: 14.52 MB / 0.8731 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt calculateStrongComponentJacobians (initialization): time 0.01275/1.34, allocations: 14.52 MB / 1.086 GB, free: 15.03 MB / 0.8887 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyAllExpressions (initialization): time 0.009301/1.349, allocations: 1.178 MB / 1.087 GB, free: 13.85 MB / 0.8887 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt collapseArrayExpressions (initialization): time 0.001355/1.351, allocations: 276 kB / 1.087 GB, free: 13.58 MB / 0.8887 GB
Warning: The initial conditions are over specified. The following 8 initial equations are redundant, so they are removed from the initialization system:
         sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start
         sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start
         sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start
         sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start
         sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3])
         sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3])
         sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3])
         sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]).
Notification: Performance of preBalanceInitialSystem (initialization_lambda0): time 0.01289/1.364, allocations: 7.07 MB / 1.094 GB, free: 6.5 MB / 0.8887 GB
Notification: Performance of partitionIndependentBlocks (initialization_lambda0): time 0.00807/1.372, allocations: 5.932 MB / 1.1 GB, free: 15.36 MB / 0.9044 GB
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3]))
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3]))
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3]))
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]))
Notification: Performance of analyzeInitialSystem (initialization_lambda0): time 0.5782/1.95, allocations: 36.56 MB / 1.136 GB, free: 271.2 MB / 0.92 GB
Notification: Performance of solveInitialSystemEqSystem (initialization_lambda0): time 7.216e-05/1.95, allocations: 27.69 kB / 1.136 GB, free: 271.2 MB / 0.92 GB
Notification: Performance of matching and sorting (n=659) (initialization_lambda0): time 0.0242/1.974, allocations: 10.07 MB / 1.146 GB, free: 270.7 MB / 0.92 GB
Notification: Performance of prepare postOptimizeDAE: time 0.0001476/1.974, allocations: 69.14 kB / 1.146 GB, free: 270.7 MB / 0.92 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyComplexFunction (initialization): time 0.0002215/1.975, allocations: 86.27 kB / 1.146 GB, free: 270.7 MB / 0.92 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt tearingSystem (initialization): time 0.002374/1.977, allocations: 0.7115 MB / 1.147 GB, free: 270.6 MB / 0.92 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt solveSimpleEquations (initialization): time 0.005794/1.983, allocations: 1.482 MB / 1.148 GB, free: 270.4 MB / 0.92 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt calculateStrongComponentJacobians (initialization): time 0.01199/1.995, allocations: 14.51 MB / 1.162 GB, free: 259 MB / 0.92 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyAllExpressions (initialization): time 0.01378/2.009, allocations: 1.181 MB / 1.163 GB, free: 258.9 MB / 0.92 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt collapseArrayExpressions (initialization): time 0.001849/2.011, allocations: 273.4 kB / 1.164 GB, free: 258.9 MB / 0.92 GB
Warning: The initial conditions are over specified. The following 8 initial equations are redundant, so they are removed from the initialization_lambda0 system:
         sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start
         sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start
         sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start
         sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start
         sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3])
         sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3])
         sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3])
         sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]).
Notification: Model statistics after passing the back-end for initialization:
 * Number of independent subsystems: 384
 * Number of states: 0 ()
 * Number of discrete variables: 5 ($PRE.pulse.count,$PRE.pulse.T_start,pulse.count,pulse.T_start,$whenCondition1)
 * Number of discrete states: 0 ()
 * Number of clocked states: 0 ()
 * Top-level inputs: 0
Notification: Strong component statistics for initialization (635):
 * Single equations (assignments): 627
 * Array equations: 0
 * Algorithm blocks: 1
 * Record equations: 0
 * When equations: 0
 * If-equations: 0
 * Equation systems (not torn): 0
 * Torn equation systems: 7
 * Mixed (continuous/discrete) equation systems: 0
Notification: Torn system details for strict tearing set:
 * Linear torn systems (#iteration vars, #inner vars, density): 7 systems
   {(1,9,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,9,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%)}
 * Non-linear torn systems (#iteration vars, #inner vars): 0 systems
Notification: Performance of prepare postOptimizeDAE: time 0.00296/2.014, allocations: 0.7692 MB / 1.164 GB, free: 258.4 MB / 0.92 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt lateInlineFunction (simulation): time 0.003042/2.017, allocations: 0.6585 MB / 1.165 GB, free: 258.4 MB / 0.92 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt wrapFunctionCalls (simulation): time 0.01201/2.029, allocations: 5.138 MB / 1.17 GB, free: 256.8 MB / 0.92 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt inlineArrayEqn (simulation): time 4.162e-05/2.029, allocations: 23.34 kB / 1.17 GB, free: 256.8 MB / 0.92 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt constantLinearSystem (simulation): time 3.951e-05/2.029, allocations: 12.25 kB / 1.17 GB, free: 256.8 MB / 0.92 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifysemiLinear (simulation): time 0.00742/2.036, allocations: 3.959 MB / 1.174 GB, free: 255.6 MB / 0.92 GB
Warning: The model contains alias variables with redundant start and/or conflicting nominal values. It is recommended to resolve the conflicts, because otherwise the system could be hard to solve. To print the conflicting alias sets and the chosen candidates please use -d=aliasConflicts.
Notification: Performance of postOpt removeSimpleEquations (simulation): time 0.03025/2.066, allocations: 13.41 MB / 1.187 GB, free: 250.6 MB / 0.92 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyComplexFunction (simulation): time 1.513e-05/2.067, allocations: 6.844 kB / 1.187 GB, free: 250.6 MB / 0.92 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt solveSimpleEquations (simulation): time 0.002519/2.069, allocations: 0.6002 MB / 1.188 GB, free: 250.6 MB / 0.92 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt tearingSystem (simulation): time 0.00147/2.071, allocations: 0.5807 MB / 1.188 GB, free: 250.4 MB / 0.92 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt inputDerivativesUsed (simulation): time 0.0004405/2.071, allocations: 138.1 kB / 1.188 GB, free: 250.4 MB / 0.92 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt calculateStrongComponentJacobians (simulation): time 0.0108/2.082, allocations: 14.39 MB / 1.202 GB, free: 239 MB / 0.92 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt calculateStateSetsJacobians (simulation): time 5.741e-06/2.082, allocations: 6.172 kB / 1.202 GB, free: 239 MB / 0.92 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt symbolicJacobian (simulation): time 0.01208/2.094, allocations: 7.117 MB / 1.209 GB, free: 236.4 MB / 0.92 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt removeConstants (simulation): time 0.005626/2.1, allocations: 1.667 MB / 1.211 GB, free: 235.4 MB / 0.92 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyTimeIndepFuncCalls (simulation): time 0.003051/2.103, allocations: 124 kB / 1.211 GB, free: 235.4 MB / 0.92 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyAllExpressions (simulation): time 0.005613/2.108, allocations: 0.6114 MB / 1.212 GB, free: 235.1 MB / 0.92 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt findZeroCrossings (simulation): time 0.0005674/2.109, allocations: 172.3 kB / 1.212 GB, free: 235 MB / 0.92 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt collapseArrayExpressions (simulation): time 0.0003279/2.109, allocations: 85.98 kB / 1.212 GB, free: 234.9 MB / 0.92 GB
Notification: Performance of sorting global known variables: time 0.01486/2.124, allocations: 7.308 MB / 1.219 GB, free: 231.3 MB / 0.92 GB
Notification: Performance of sort global known variables: time 6.82e-07/2.124, allocations: 1.688 kB / 1.219 GB, free: 231.3 MB / 0.92 GB
Notification: Performance of remove unused functions: time 0.01732/2.141, allocations: 3.958 MB / 1.223 GB, free: 231 MB / 0.92 GB
Notification: Model statistics after passing the back-end for simulation:
 * Number of independent subsystems: 12
 * Number of states: 43 (sla.vol[1].dynBal.U,sla.vol[2].dynBal.U,sla.vol[3].dynBal.U,sla.vol[4].dynBal.U,sla.vol[5].dynBal.U,sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_b[1].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[2].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[3].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[4].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[5].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T[3],TOut.T)
 * Number of discrete variables: 3 ($whenCondition1,pulse.T_start,pulse.count)
 * Number of discrete states: 1 (pulse.count)
 * Number of clocked states: 0 ()
 * Top-level inputs: 0
Notification: Strong component statistics for simulation (210):
 * Single equations (assignments): 199
 * Array equations: 0
 * Algorithm blocks: 0
 * Record equations: 2
 * When equations: 2
 * If-equations: 0
 * Equation systems (not torn): 0
 * Torn equation systems: 7
 * Mixed (continuous/discrete) equation systems: 0
Notification: Torn system details for strict tearing set:
 * Linear torn systems (#iteration vars, #inner vars, density): 7 systems
   {(1,9,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,9,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%)}
 * Non-linear torn systems (#iteration vars, #inner vars): 0 systems
Notification: Performance of Backend phase and start with SimCode phase: time 0.002525/2.144, allocations: 0.593 MB / 1.223 GB, free: 230.8 MB / 0.92 GB
Notification: Performance of simCode: created initialization part: time 0.01978/2.164, allocations: 13.44 MB / 1.237 GB, free: 219.6 MB / 0.92 GB
Notification: Performance of simCode: created event and clocks part: time 1.255e-05/2.164, allocations: 4.375 kB / 1.237 GB, free: 219.6 MB / 0.92 GB
Notification: Performance of simCode: created simulation system equations: time 0.004219/2.168, allocations: 3.045 MB / 1.24 GB, free: 216.4 MB / 0.92 GB
Notification: Performance of simCode: created of all other equations (e.g. parameter, nominal, assert, etc): time 0.01832/2.186, allocations: 2.936 MB / 1.242 GB, free: 213.7 MB / 0.92 GB
Notification: Performance of simCode: created linear, non-linear and system jacobian parts: time 0.03463/2.221, allocations: 18.72 MB / 1.261 GB, free: 195 MB / 0.92 GB
Notification: Performance of simCode: some other stuff during SimCode phase: time 0.01067/2.232, allocations: 5.361 MB / 1.266 GB, free: 189.6 MB / 0.92 GB
Notification: Performance of simCode: alias equations: time 0.01528/2.247, allocations: 6.461 MB / 1.272 GB, free: 183.2 MB / 0.92 GB
Notification: Performance of simCode: all other stuff during SimCode phase: time 0.003164/2.25, allocations: 423.4 kB / 1.273 GB, free: 182.8 MB / 0.92 GB
Notification: Performance of SimCode: time 1.433e-06/2.25, allocations: 4 kB / 1.273 GB, free: 182.8 MB / 0.92 GB
Notification: Performance of Templates: time 0.1984/2.449, allocations: 143.4 MB / 1.413 GB, free: 40.75 MB / 0.92 GB
make -j1 -f Buildings_8_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.makefile
(rm -f Buildings_8_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.pipe ; mkfifo Buildings_8_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.pipe ; head -c 1048576 < Buildings_8_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.pipe >> ../files/Buildings_8_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.sim & ./Buildings_8_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU  -abortSlowSimulation -alarm=480 -s cvode -lv LOG_STATS > Buildings_8_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.pipe 2>&1)