Running: ./testmodel.py --libraries=/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries --ompython_omhome=/usr Buildings_latest_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference.conf.json loadFile("/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/ModelicaServices 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo", uses=false) [Timeout 90] Notification: Performance of loadFile(/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/ModelicaServices 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo): time 0.002039/0.002039, allocations: 104.1 kB / 18.19 MB, free: 4.117 MB / 14.72 MB [Timeout remaining time 90] loadFile("/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Complex 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo", uses=false) [Timeout 90] Notification: Performance of loadFile(/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Complex 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo): time 0.002446/0.002446, allocations: 192.4 kB / 21.34 MB, free: 0.9766 MB / 14.72 MB [Timeout remaining time 90] loadFile("/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Modelica 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo", uses=false) [Timeout 90] Notification: Performance of loadFile(/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Modelica 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo): time 1.44/1.44, allocations: 225.6 MB / 249.9 MB, free: 3.223 MB / 190.1 MB [Timeout remaining time 88] loadFile("/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Buildings 12.0.0-master/package.mo", uses=false) [Timeout 90] Notification: Performance of loadFile(/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Buildings 12.0.0-master/package.mo): time 2.901/2.901, allocations: 489.7 MB / 0.7761 GB, free: 2.656 MB / 0.6075 GB [Timeout remaining time 86] Using package Buildings with version 12.0.0 (/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Buildings 12.0.0-master/package.mo) Using package Modelica with version 4.0.0 (/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Modelica 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo) Using package Complex with version 4.0.0 (/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Complex 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo) Using package ModelicaServices with version 4.0.0 (/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/ModelicaServices 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo) Running command: translateModel(Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference,tolerance=1e-06,outputFormat="mat",numberOfIntervals=503,variableFilter="time|sla.sta_b.T|sla.surf_a.T|sla.surf_b.T|sla.surf_a.Q_flow|sla.surf_b.Q_flow",fileNamePrefix="Buildings_latest_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference") translateModel(Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference,tolerance=1e-06,outputFormat="mat",numberOfIntervals=503,variableFilter="time|sla.sta_b.T|sla.surf_a.T|sla.surf_b.T|sla.surf_a.Q_flow|sla.surf_b.Q_flow",fileNamePrefix="Buildings_latest_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference") [Timeout 300] Notification: Performance of FrontEnd - loaded program: time 0.00227/0.00227, allocations: 71.86 kB / 1.127 GB, free: 3.066 MB / 0.8575 GB Notification: Performance of FrontEnd - Absyn->SCode: time 1.066/1.068, allocations: 172.1 MB / 1.295 GB, free: 5.688 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of NFInst.instantiate(Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference): time 0.03992/1.108, allocations: 32.04 MB / 1.326 GB, free: 14.8 MB / 1.029 GB Notification: Performance of NFInst.instExpressions: time 0.02125/1.129, allocations: 12.32 MB / 1.338 GB, free: 5.02 MB / 1.029 GB Notification: Performance of NFInst.updateImplicitVariability: time 0.003306/1.133, allocations: 60.06 kB / 1.338 GB, free: 5 MB / 1.029 GB Notification: Performance of NFTyping.typeComponents: time 0.004135/1.137, allocations: 1.131 MB / 1.339 GB, free: 4.156 MB / 1.029 GB Notification: Performance of NFTyping.typeBindings: time 0.007175/1.144, allocations: 2.157 MB / 1.341 GB, free: 2.445 MB / 1.029 GB Notification: Performance of NFTyping.typeClassSections: time 0.00585/1.15, allocations: 1.881 MB / 1.343 GB, free: 1.074 MB / 1.029 GB Notification: Performance of NFFlatten.flatten: time 0.02365/1.174, allocations: 19.64 MB / 1.362 GB, free: 6.121 MB / 1.045 GB Notification: Performance of NFFlatten.resolveConnections: time 0.01036/1.184, allocations: 6.32 MB / 1.369 GB, free: 2.203 MB / 1.045 GB Notification: Performance of NFEvalConstants.evaluate: time 0.01693/1.201, allocations: 6.644 MB / 1.375 GB, free: 13.29 MB / 1.061 GB Notification: Performance of NFSimplifyModel.simplify: time 0.01317/1.214, allocations: 5.629 MB / 1.381 GB, free: 7.637 MB / 1.061 GB Notification: Performance of NFPackage.collectConstants: time 0.002811/1.217, allocations: 0.75 MB / 1.381 GB, free: 6.887 MB / 1.061 GB Notification: Performance of NFFlatten.collectFunctions: time 0.009353/1.226, allocations: 3.235 MB / 1.385 GB, free: 3.645 MB / 1.061 GB Notification: Performance of NFScalarize.scalarize: time 0.005375/1.232, allocations: 3.085 MB / 1.388 GB, free: 0.5508 MB / 1.061 GB Notification: Performance of NFVerifyModel.verify: time 0.01029/1.242, allocations: 4.753 MB / 1.392 GB, free: 11.77 MB / 1.076 GB Notification: Performance of NFConvertDAE.convert: time 0.0249/1.267, allocations: 15.51 MB / 1.407 GB, free: 12.22 MB / 1.092 GB Notification: Performance of FrontEnd - DAE generated: time 8.476e-06/1.267, allocations: 0 / 1.407 GB, free: 12.22 MB / 1.092 GB Notification: Performance of FrontEnd: time 2.795e-06/1.267, allocations: 0 / 1.407 GB, free: 12.22 MB / 1.092 GB Notification: Performance of Transformations before backend: time 0.0004681/1.267, allocations: 0 / 1.407 GB, free: 12.22 MB / 1.092 GB Notification: Model statistics after passing the front-end and creating the data structures used by the back-end: * Number of equations: 866 * Number of variables: 866 Notification: Performance of Generate backend data structure: time 0.03679/1.304, allocations: 11.75 MB / 1.419 GB, free: 360 kB / 1.092 GB Notification: Performance of prepare preOptimizeDAE: time 5.357e-05/1.304, allocations: 8.031 kB / 1.419 GB, free: 352 kB / 1.092 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt normalInlineFunction (simulation): time 0.00504/1.309, allocations: 0.9247 MB / 1.42 GB, free: 15.41 MB / 1.107 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt evaluateParameters (simulation): time 0.02506/1.334, allocations: 9.682 MB / 1.429 GB, free: 5.66 MB / 1.107 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt simplifyIfEquations (simulation): time 0.0004133/1.335, allocations: 334.8 kB / 1.43 GB, free: 5.332 MB / 1.107 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt expandDerOperator (simulation): time 0.001983/1.337, allocations: 483.9 kB / 1.43 GB, free: 4.859 MB / 1.107 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt clockPartitioning (simulation): time 0.01452/1.351, allocations: 5.963 MB / 1.436 GB, free: 14.66 MB / 1.123 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt findStateOrder (simulation): time 0.0001525/1.351, allocations: 15.83 kB / 1.436 GB, free: 14.64 MB / 1.123 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt replaceEdgeChange (simulation): time 0.001086/1.352, allocations: 147.9 kB / 1.436 GB, free: 14.5 MB / 1.123 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt inlineArrayEqn (simulation): time 0.0001366/1.352, allocations: 95.98 kB / 1.436 GB, free: 14.41 MB / 1.123 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt removeEqualRHS (simulation): time 0.01024/1.363, allocations: 4.762 MB / 1.441 GB, free: 9.633 MB / 1.123 GB Warning: The model contains alias variables with redundant start and/or conflicting nominal values. It is recommended to resolve the conflicts, because otherwise the system could be hard to solve. To print the conflicting alias sets and the chosen candidates please use -d=aliasConflicts. Notification: Performance of preOpt removeSimpleEquations (simulation): time 0.06693/1.43, allocations: 33.81 MB / 1.474 GB, free: 6.176 MB / 1.154 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt comSubExp (simulation): time 0.01426/1.444, allocations: 6.045 MB / 1.48 GB, free: 32 kB / 1.154 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt resolveLoops (simulation): time 0.004695/1.449, allocations: 2.427 MB / 1.482 GB, free: 13.59 MB / 1.17 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt evalFunc (simulation): time 0.02995/1.479, allocations: 13.24 MB / 1.495 GB, free: 15.8 MB / 1.186 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt encapsulateWhenConditions (simulation): time 0.00402/1.483, allocations: 2.141 MB / 1.497 GB, free: 13.64 MB / 1.186 GB Notification: Performance of pre-optimization done (n=224): time 5.079e-06/1.483, allocations: 4 kB / 1.497 GB, free: 13.64 MB / 1.186 GB Notification: Performance of matching and sorting (n=232): time 0.03381/1.516, allocations: 14.27 MB / 1.511 GB, free: 15.21 MB / 1.201 GB Notification: Performance of inlineWhenForInitialization (initialization): time 0.0001112/1.516, allocations: 136.8 kB / 1.511 GB, free: 15.05 MB / 1.201 GB Notification: Performance of selectInitializationVariablesDAE (initialization): time 0.02403/1.54, allocations: 10.43 MB / 1.521 GB, free: 4.633 MB / 1.201 GB Notification: Performance of collectPreVariables (initialization): time 0.00102/1.542, allocations: 117.7 kB / 1.521 GB, free: 4.512 MB / 1.201 GB Notification: Performance of collectInitialEqns (initialization): time 0.005466/1.547, allocations: 3.353 MB / 1.525 GB, free: 1.141 MB / 1.201 GB Notification: Performance of collectInitialBindings (initialization): time 0.002186/1.549, allocations: 0.9065 MB / 1.526 GB, free: 232 kB / 1.201 GB Notification: Performance of simplifyInitialFunctions (initialization): time 0.003877/1.553, allocations: 1.214 MB / 1.527 GB, free: 15 MB / 1.217 GB Notification: Performance of setup shared object (initialization): time 0.0001371/1.553, allocations: 301.1 kB / 1.527 GB, free: 14.71 MB / 1.217 GB Notification: Performance of preBalanceInitialSystem (initialization): time 0.006186/1.559, allocations: 3.447 MB / 1.53 GB, free: 11.24 MB / 1.217 GB Notification: Performance of partitionIndependentBlocks (initialization): time 0.008591/1.568, allocations: 5.928 MB / 1.536 GB, free: 4.109 MB / 1.217 GB Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3])) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3])) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3])) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3])) Notification: Performance of analyzeInitialSystem (initialization): time 0.06614/1.634, allocations: 36.66 MB / 1.572 GB, free: 14 MB / 1.264 GB Notification: Performance of solveInitialSystemEqSystem (initialization): time 8.561e-05/1.634, allocations: 24 kB / 1.572 GB, free: 13.98 MB / 1.264 GB Notification: Performance of matching and sorting (n=659) (initialization): time 0.03157/1.666, allocations: 10.11 MB / 1.582 GB, free: 3.789 MB / 1.264 GB Notification: Performance of prepare postOptimizeDAE: time 0.0002141/1.666, allocations: 69.7 kB / 1.582 GB, free: 3.715 MB / 1.264 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyComplexFunction (initialization): time 0.0002423/1.666, allocations: 87.94 kB / 1.582 GB, free: 3.629 MB / 1.264 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt tearingSystem (initialization): time 0.002764/1.669, allocations: 0.7123 MB / 1.583 GB, free: 2.895 MB / 1.264 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt solveSimpleEquations (initialization): time 0.009103/1.678, allocations: 1.478 MB / 1.584 GB, free: 1.414 MB / 1.264 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt calculateStrongComponentJacobians (initialization): time 0.02041/1.698, allocations: 14.52 MB / 1.598 GB, free: 1.914 MB / 1.279 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyAllExpressions (initialization): time 0.01055/1.709, allocations: 1.182 MB / 1.599 GB, free: 0.7305 MB / 1.279 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt collapseArrayExpressions (initialization): time 0.001478/1.711, allocations: 280 kB / 1.6 GB, free: 468 kB / 1.279 GB Warning: The initial conditions are over specified. The following 8 initial equations are redundant, so they are removed from the initialization system: sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3]) sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3]) sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3]) sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]). Notification: Performance of preBalanceInitialSystem (initialization_lambda0): time 0.01453/1.725, allocations: 7.083 MB / 1.607 GB, free: 9.363 MB / 1.295 GB Notification: Performance of partitionIndependentBlocks (initialization_lambda0): time 0.00947/1.735, allocations: 5.928 MB / 1.612 GB, free: 2.23 MB / 1.295 GB Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3])) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3])) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3])) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3])) Notification: Performance of analyzeInitialSystem (initialization_lambda0): time 0.08843/1.823, allocations: 36.56 MB / 1.648 GB, free: 12.21 MB / 1.342 GB Notification: Performance of solveInitialSystemEqSystem (initialization_lambda0): time 0.0001129/1.823, allocations: 27.94 kB / 1.648 GB, free: 12.18 MB / 1.342 GB Notification: Performance of matching and sorting (n=659) (initialization_lambda0): time 0.03292/1.856, allocations: 10.1 MB / 1.658 GB, free: 2 MB / 1.342 GB Notification: Performance of prepare postOptimizeDAE: time 0.0001359/1.856, allocations: 69.7 kB / 1.658 GB, free: 1.926 MB / 1.342 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyComplexFunction (initialization): time 0.000168/1.856, allocations: 84 kB / 1.658 GB, free: 1.844 MB / 1.342 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt tearingSystem (initialization): time 0.002365/1.859, allocations: 0.7126 MB / 1.659 GB, free: 1.109 MB / 1.342 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt solveSimpleEquations (initialization): time 0.00877/1.867, allocations: 1.482 MB / 1.66 GB, free: 15.62 MB / 1.357 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt calculateStrongComponentJacobians (initialization): time 0.01889/1.886, allocations: 14.52 MB / 1.675 GB, free: 128 kB / 1.357 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyAllExpressions (initialization): time 0.009688/1.896, allocations: 1.182 MB / 1.676 GB, free: 14.94 MB / 1.373 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt collapseArrayExpressions (initialization): time 0.001272/1.897, allocations: 268 kB / 1.676 GB, free: 14.68 MB / 1.373 GB Warning: The initial conditions are over specified. The following 8 initial equations are redundant, so they are removed from the initialization_lambda0 system: sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3]) sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3]) sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3]) sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]). Notification: Model statistics after passing the back-end for initialization: * Number of independent subsystems: 384 * Number of states: 0 () * Number of discrete variables: 5 ($PRE.pulse.count,$PRE.pulse.T_start,pulse.count,pulse.T_start,$whenCondition1) * Number of discrete states: 0 () * Number of clocked states: 0 () * Top-level inputs: 0 Notification: Strong component statistics for initialization (635): * Single equations (assignments): 627 * Array equations: 0 * Algorithm blocks: 1 * Record equations: 0 * When equations: 0 * If-equations: 0 * Equation systems (not torn): 0 * Torn equation systems: 7 * Mixed (continuous/discrete) equation systems: 0 Notification: Torn system details for strict tearing set: * Linear torn systems (#iteration vars, #inner vars, density): 7 systems {(1,9,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,9,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%)} * Non-linear torn systems (#iteration vars, #inner vars): 0 systems Notification: Performance of prepare postOptimizeDAE: time 0.001787/1.899, allocations: 0.761 MB / 1.677 GB, free: 13.91 MB / 1.373 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt lateInlineFunction (simulation): time 0.002521/1.902, allocations: 0.6985 MB / 1.677 GB, free: 13.2 MB / 1.373 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt wrapFunctionCalls (simulation): time 0.009731/1.911, allocations: 5.144 MB / 1.682 GB, free: 8.023 MB / 1.373 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt inlineArrayEqn (simulation): time 3.33e-05/1.911, allocations: 27.98 kB / 1.682 GB, free: 7.996 MB / 1.373 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt constantLinearSystem (simulation): time 1.16e-05/1.911, allocations: 4 kB / 1.682 GB, free: 7.992 MB / 1.373 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifysemiLinear (simulation): time 0.006174/1.918, allocations: 3.95 MB / 1.686 GB, free: 4.008 MB / 1.373 GB Warning: The model contains alias variables with redundant start and/or conflicting nominal values. It is recommended to resolve the conflicts, because otherwise the system could be hard to solve. To print the conflicting alias sets and the chosen candidates please use -d=aliasConflicts. Notification: Performance of postOpt removeSimpleEquations (simulation): time 0.03389/1.951, allocations: 13.4 MB / 1.699 GB, free: 6.379 MB / 1.389 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyComplexFunction (simulation): time 1.846e-05/1.951, allocations: 3.938 kB / 1.699 GB, free: 6.375 MB / 1.389 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt solveSimpleEquations (simulation): time 0.002802/1.954, allocations: 0.601 MB / 1.7 GB, free: 5.773 MB / 1.389 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt tearingSystem (simulation): time 0.001735/1.956, allocations: 0.5833 MB / 1.701 GB, free: 5.168 MB / 1.389 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt inputDerivativesUsed (simulation): time 0.0005818/1.957, allocations: 135.9 kB / 1.701 GB, free: 5.035 MB / 1.389 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt calculateStrongComponentJacobians (simulation): time 0.01416/1.971, allocations: 14.38 MB / 1.715 GB, free: 5.664 MB / 1.404 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt calculateStateSetsJacobians (simulation): time 4.96e-06/1.971, allocations: 7.938 kB / 1.715 GB, free: 5.656 MB / 1.404 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt symbolicJacobian (simulation): time 0.01303/1.984, allocations: 7.141 MB / 1.722 GB, free: 14.43 MB / 1.42 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt removeConstants (simulation): time 0.005787/1.99, allocations: 1.699 MB / 1.723 GB, free: 12.71 MB / 1.42 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyTimeIndepFuncCalls (simulation): time 0.002508/1.992, allocations: 131.8 kB / 1.723 GB, free: 12.58 MB / 1.42 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyAllExpressions (simulation): time 0.005875/1.998, allocations: 0.6122 MB / 1.724 GB, free: 11.96 MB / 1.42 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt findZeroCrossings (simulation): time 0.0006288/1.999, allocations: 165.7 kB / 1.724 GB, free: 11.8 MB / 1.42 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt collapseArrayExpressions (simulation): time 0.0004141/1.999, allocations: 83.95 kB / 1.724 GB, free: 11.72 MB / 1.42 GB Notification: Performance of sorting global known variables: time 0.01795/2.017, allocations: 7.339 MB / 1.731 GB, free: 4.391 MB / 1.42 GB Notification: Performance of sort global known variables: time 2.1e-07/2.017, allocations: 0 / 1.731 GB, free: 4.391 MB / 1.42 GB Notification: Performance of remove unused functions: time 0.02029/2.037, allocations: 3.972 MB / 1.735 GB, free: 428 kB / 1.42 GB Notification: Model statistics after passing the back-end for simulation: * Number of independent subsystems: 12 * Number of states: 43 (sla.vol[1].dynBal.U,sla.vol[2].dynBal.U,sla.vol[3].dynBal.U,sla.vol[4].dynBal.U,sla.vol[5].dynBal.U,sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_b[1].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[2].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[3].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[4].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[5].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T[3],TOut.T) * Number of discrete variables: 3 ($whenCondition1,pulse.T_start,pulse.count) * Number of discrete states: 1 (pulse.count) * Number of clocked states: 0 () * Top-level inputs: 0 Notification: Strong component statistics for simulation (210): * Single equations (assignments): 199 * Array equations: 0 * Algorithm blocks: 0 * Record equations: 2 * When equations: 2 * If-equations: 0 * Equation systems (not torn): 0 * Torn equation systems: 7 * Mixed (continuous/discrete) equation systems: 0 Notification: Torn system details for strict tearing set: * Linear torn systems (#iteration vars, #inner vars, density): 7 systems {(1,9,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,9,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%)} * Non-linear torn systems (#iteration vars, #inner vars): 0 systems Notification: Performance of Backend phase and start with SimCode phase: time 0.002685/2.04, allocations: 0.6051 MB / 1.736 GB, free: 15.82 MB / 1.436 GB Notification: Performance of simCode: created initialization part: time 0.02495/2.065, allocations: 13.1 MB / 1.749 GB, free: 2.531 MB / 1.436 GB Notification: Performance of simCode: created event and clocks part: time 1.44e-05/2.065, allocations: 0 / 1.749 GB, free: 2.531 MB / 1.436 GB Notification: Performance of simCode: created simulation system equations: time 0.005751/2.071, allocations: 2.962 MB / 1.752 GB, free: 15.48 MB / 1.451 GB Notification: Performance of simCode: created of all other equations (e.g. parameter, nominal, assert, etc): time 0.01785/2.088, allocations: 2.93 MB / 1.754 GB, free: 12.59 MB / 1.451 GB Notification: Performance of simCode: created linear, non-linear and system jacobian parts: time 0.03704/2.125, allocations: 19.4 MB / 1.773 GB, free: 9.105 MB / 1.467 GB Notification: Performance of simCode: some other stuff during SimCode phase: time 0.00801/2.133, allocations: 5.369 MB / 1.779 GB, free: 3.695 MB / 1.467 GB Notification: Performance of simCode: all other stuff during SimCode phase: time 0.002889/2.136, allocations: 459.3 kB / 1.779 GB, free: 3.246 MB / 1.467 GB Notification: Performance of SimCode: time 1.252e-06/2.136, allocations: 0 / 1.779 GB, free: 3.246 MB / 1.467 GB Notification: Performance of Templates: time 1.165/3.301, allocations: 479.2 MB / 2.247 GB, free: 88.09 MB / 1.514 GB [Timeout remaining time 297] make -j1 -f Buildings_latest_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference.makefile [Timeout 300] (rm -f Buildings_latest_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference.pipe ; mkfifo Buildings_latest_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference.pipe ; head -c 1048576 < Buildings_latest_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference.pipe >> ../files/Buildings_latest_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference.sim & ./Buildings_latest_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference -abortSlowSimulation -alarm=400 -emit_protected -lv LOG_STATS > Buildings_latest_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference.pipe 2>&1) [Timeout 400] diffSimulationResults("Buildings_latest_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference_res.mat","/mnt/ReferenceFiles/Buildings/csv/master/Buildings_Fluid_HeatExchangers_RadiantSlabs_Examples_StepResponseFiniteDifference.csv","/var/lib/jenkins1/ws/OpenModelicaLibraryTestingWork/OpenModelicaLibraryTesting/files/Buildings_latest_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference.diff",relTol=0.003,relTolDiffMinMax=0.003,rangeDelta=0.001) [Timeout 300] [Timeout remaining time 300] Reference file matches