Running: ./testmodel.py --libraries=/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries --ompython_omhome=/usr Buildings_latest_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference.conf.json loadFile("/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/ModelicaServices 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo", uses=false) loadFile("/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Complex 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo", uses=false) loadFile("/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Modelica 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo", uses=false) loadFile("/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Buildings 11.0.1-master/package.mo", uses=false) Using package Buildings with version 11.0.1 (/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Buildings 11.0.1-master/package.mo) Using package Modelica with version 4.0.0 (/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Modelica 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo) Using package Complex with version 4.0.0 (/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Complex 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo) Using package ModelicaServices with version 4.0.0 (/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/ModelicaServices 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo) Running command: translateModel(Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference,tolerance=1e-06,outputFormat="mat",numberOfIntervals=5000,variableFilter="time|sla.sta_b.T|sla.surf_a.T|sla.surf_b.T|sla.surf_a.Q_flow|sla.surf_b.Q_flow",fileNamePrefix="Buildings_latest_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference") translateModel(Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference,tolerance=1e-06,outputFormat="mat",numberOfIntervals=5000,variableFilter="time|sla.sta_b.T|sla.surf_a.T|sla.surf_b.T|sla.surf_a.Q_flow|sla.surf_b.Q_flow",fileNamePrefix="Buildings_latest_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference") Notification: Performance of loadFile(/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/ModelicaServices 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo): time 0.001666/0.001666, allocations: 106.7 kB / 16.41 MB, free: 6.465 MB / 14.72 MB Notification: Performance of loadFile(/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Complex 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo): time 0.002042/0.002042, allocations: 187 kB / 17.34 MB, free: 5.723 MB / 14.72 MB Notification: Performance of loadFile(/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Modelica 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo): time 1.438/1.438, allocations: 222.9 MB / 241 MB, free: 15.07 MB / 206.1 MB Notification: Performance of loadFile(/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Buildings 11.0.1-master/package.mo): time 2.639/2.639, allocations: 461.9 MB / 0.7354 GB, free: 11.01 MB / 0.6075 GB Notification: Performance of FrontEnd - loaded program: time 0.001521/0.001521, allocations: 67.83 kB / 1.055 GB, free: 7.621 MB / 0.8262 GB Notification: Performance of FrontEnd - Absyn->SCode: time 0.9761/0.9776, allocations: 157.4 MB / 1.208 GB, free: 13.59 MB / 0.9356 GB Notification: Performance of NFInst.instantiate(Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference): time 0.03621/1.014, allocations: 31.76 MB / 1.239 GB, free: 13.72 MB / 0.9669 GB Notification: Performance of NFInst.instExpressions: time 0.02106/1.035, allocations: 12.28 MB / 1.251 GB, free: 1.406 MB / 0.9669 GB Notification: Performance of NFInst.updateImplicitVariability: time 0.00312/1.038, allocations: 63.62 kB / 1.252 GB, free: 1.344 MB / 0.9669 GB Notification: Performance of NFTyping.typeComponents: time 0.004107/1.042, allocations: 1.111 MB / 1.253 GB, free: 232 kB / 0.9669 GB Notification: Performance of NFTyping.typeBindings: time 0.007273/1.05, allocations: 2.079 MB / 1.255 GB, free: 14.14 MB / 0.9825 GB Notification: Performance of NFTyping.typeClassSections: time 0.006402/1.056, allocations: 1.877 MB / 1.256 GB, free: 12.27 MB / 0.9825 GB Notification: Performance of NFFlatten.flatten: time 0.02527/1.081, allocations: 19.56 MB / 1.276 GB, free: 8.676 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of NFFlatten.resolveConnections: time 0.012/1.093, allocations: 7.193 MB / 1.283 GB, free: 1.406 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of NFEvalConstants.evaluate: time 0.01392/1.107, allocations: 6.521 MB / 1.289 GB, free: 10.88 MB / 1.014 GB Notification: Performance of NFSimplifyModel.simplify: time 0.01113/1.119, allocations: 5.352 MB / 1.294 GB, free: 5.508 MB / 1.014 GB Notification: Performance of NFPackage.collectConstants: time 0.003413/1.122, allocations: 0.75 MB / 1.295 GB, free: 4.758 MB / 1.014 GB Notification: Performance of NFFlatten.collectFunctions: time 0.01009/1.132, allocations: 3.223 MB / 1.298 GB, free: 1.535 MB / 1.014 GB Notification: Performance of NFScalarize.scalarize: time 0.005778/1.138, allocations: 2.996 MB / 1.301 GB, free: 14.53 MB / 1.029 GB Notification: Performance of NFVerifyModel.verify: time 0.01281/1.151, allocations: 4.749 MB / 1.306 GB, free: 9.762 MB / 1.029 GB Notification: Performance of NFConvertDAE.convert: time 0.02365/1.174, allocations: 15.43 MB / 1.321 GB, free: 10.29 MB / 1.045 GB Notification: Performance of FrontEnd - DAE generated: time 1.459e-05/1.175, allocations: 8 kB / 1.321 GB, free: 10.28 MB / 1.045 GB Notification: Performance of FrontEnd: time 2.294e-06/1.175, allocations: 3.938 kB / 1.321 GB, free: 10.27 MB / 1.045 GB Notification: Performance of Transformations before backend: time 0.0005108/1.175, allocations: 0 / 1.321 GB, free: 10.27 MB / 1.045 GB Notification: Model statistics after passing the front-end and creating the data structures used by the back-end: * Number of equations: 866 * Number of variables: 866 Notification: Performance of Generate backend data structure: time 0.03623/1.211, allocations: 11.49 MB / 1.332 GB, free: 14.67 MB / 1.061 GB Notification: Performance of prepare preOptimizeDAE: time 4.907e-05/1.211, allocations: 8.031 kB / 1.332 GB, free: 14.66 MB / 1.061 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt normalInlineFunction (simulation): time 0.004574/1.216, allocations: 0.8771 MB / 1.333 GB, free: 13.78 MB / 1.061 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt evaluateParameters (simulation): time 0.02224/1.238, allocations: 9.616 MB / 1.342 GB, free: 4.09 MB / 1.061 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt simplifyIfEquations (simulation): time 0.0003276/1.239, allocations: 334.8 kB / 1.343 GB, free: 3.762 MB / 1.061 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt expandDerOperator (simulation): time 0.00167/1.24, allocations: 483.8 kB / 1.343 GB, free: 3.289 MB / 1.061 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt clockPartitioning (simulation): time 0.01084/1.251, allocations: 5.964 MB / 1.349 GB, free: 13.09 MB / 1.076 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt findStateOrder (simulation): time 7.495e-05/1.251, allocations: 11.94 kB / 1.349 GB, free: 13.07 MB / 1.076 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt replaceEdgeChange (simulation): time 0.0003984/1.252, allocations: 144 kB / 1.349 GB, free: 12.93 MB / 1.076 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt inlineArrayEqn (simulation): time 9.648e-05/1.252, allocations: 95.92 kB / 1.349 GB, free: 12.84 MB / 1.076 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt removeEqualRHS (simulation): time 0.007985/1.26, allocations: 4.762 MB / 1.354 GB, free: 8.066 MB / 1.076 GB Warning: The model contains alias variables with redundant start and/or conflicting nominal values. It is recommended to resolve the conflicts, because otherwise the system could be hard to solve. To print the conflicting alias sets and the chosen candidates please use -d=aliasConflicts. Notification: Performance of preOpt removeSimpleEquations (simulation): time 0.05865/1.318, allocations: 33.77 MB / 1.387 GB, free: 4.637 MB / 1.107 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt comSubExp (simulation): time 0.01254/1.331, allocations: 6.228 MB / 1.393 GB, free: 14.31 MB / 1.123 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt resolveLoops (simulation): time 0.004314/1.335, allocations: 2.56 MB / 1.395 GB, free: 11.74 MB / 1.123 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt evalFunc (simulation): time 0.02804/1.363, allocations: 13.22 MB / 1.408 GB, free: 13.98 MB / 1.139 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt encapsulateWhenConditions (simulation): time 0.004352/1.368, allocations: 2.137 MB / 1.41 GB, free: 11.82 MB / 1.139 GB Notification: Performance of pre-optimization done (n=224): time 7.685e-06/1.368, allocations: 0 / 1.41 GB, free: 11.82 MB / 1.139 GB Notification: Performance of matching and sorting (n=232): time 0.03873/1.407, allocations: 14.02 MB / 1.424 GB, free: 13.61 MB / 1.154 GB Notification: Performance of inlineWhenForInitialization (initialization): time 0.0001023/1.407, allocations: 128.8 kB / 1.424 GB, free: 13.46 MB / 1.154 GB Notification: Performance of selectInitializationVariablesDAE (initialization): time 0.02353/1.43, allocations: 10.42 MB / 1.434 GB, free: 3.043 MB / 1.154 GB Notification: Performance of collectPreVariables (initialization): time 0.001156/1.432, allocations: 117.7 kB / 1.434 GB, free: 2.922 MB / 1.154 GB Notification: Performance of collectInitialEqns (initialization): time 0.0057/1.437, allocations: 3.305 MB / 1.438 GB, free: 15.59 MB / 1.17 GB Notification: Performance of collectInitialBindings (initialization): time 0.002258/1.44, allocations: 0.8707 MB / 1.438 GB, free: 14.71 MB / 1.17 GB Notification: Performance of simplifyInitialFunctions (initialization): time 0.004348/1.444, allocations: 1.209 MB / 1.44 GB, free: 13.49 MB / 1.17 GB Notification: Performance of setup shared object (initialization): time 0.0001036/1.444, allocations: 305.1 kB / 1.44 GB, free: 13.19 MB / 1.17 GB Notification: Performance of preBalanceInitialSystem (initialization): time 0.006162/1.45, allocations: 3.451 MB / 1.443 GB, free: 9.723 MB / 1.17 GB Notification: Performance of partitionIndependentBlocks (initialization): time 0.008397/1.459, allocations: 5.936 MB / 1.449 GB, free: 2.582 MB / 1.17 GB Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3])) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3])) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3])) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3])) Notification: Performance of analyzeInitialSystem (initialization): time 0.06654/1.525, allocations: 36.63 MB / 1.485 GB, free: 12.5 MB / 1.217 GB Notification: Performance of solveInitialSystemEqSystem (initialization): time 0.0001007/1.525, allocations: 24 kB / 1.485 GB, free: 12.47 MB / 1.217 GB Notification: Performance of matching and sorting (n=659) (initialization): time 0.02188/1.547, allocations: 10.09 MB / 1.495 GB, free: 2.301 MB / 1.217 GB Notification: Performance of prepare postOptimizeDAE: time 0.000155/1.548, allocations: 65.7 kB / 1.495 GB, free: 2.23 MB / 1.217 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyComplexFunction (initialization): time 0.0001514/1.548, allocations: 84 kB / 1.495 GB, free: 2.148 MB / 1.217 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt tearingSystem (initialization): time 0.001804/1.549, allocations: 0.7165 MB / 1.496 GB, free: 1.41 MB / 1.217 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt solveSimpleEquations (initialization): time 0.005765/1.555, allocations: 1.482 MB / 1.497 GB, free: 15.92 MB / 1.232 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt calculateStrongComponentJacobians (initialization): time 0.01269/1.568, allocations: 14.51 MB / 1.511 GB, free: 452 kB / 1.232 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyAllExpressions (initialization): time 0.01025/1.578, allocations: 1.189 MB / 1.512 GB, free: 15.25 MB / 1.248 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt collapseArrayExpressions (initialization): time 0.00149/1.58, allocations: 276 kB / 1.513 GB, free: 14.98 MB / 1.248 GB Warning: The initial conditions are over specified. The following 8 initial equations are redundant, so they are removed from the initialization system: sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3]) sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3]) sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3]) sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]). Notification: Performance of preBalanceInitialSystem (initialization_lambda0): time 0.01535/1.595, allocations: 7.092 MB / 1.52 GB, free: 7.875 MB / 1.248 GB Notification: Performance of partitionIndependentBlocks (initialization_lambda0): time 0.01004/1.605, allocations: 5.928 MB / 1.525 GB, free: 0.7422 MB / 1.248 GB Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3])) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3])) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3])) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3])) Notification: Performance of analyzeInitialSystem (initialization_lambda0): time 0.9072/2.513, allocations: 36.57 MB / 1.561 GB, free: 311.4 MB / 1.279 GB Notification: Performance of solveInitialSystemEqSystem (initialization_lambda0): time 8.351e-05/2.513, allocations: 23.75 kB / 1.561 GB, free: 311.4 MB / 1.279 GB Notification: Performance of matching and sorting (n=659) (initialization_lambda0): time 0.02199/2.535, allocations: 10.08 MB / 1.571 GB, free: 309.5 MB / 1.279 GB Notification: Performance of prepare postOptimizeDAE: time 8.411e-05/2.535, allocations: 70.2 kB / 1.571 GB, free: 309.5 MB / 1.279 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyComplexFunction (initialization): time 0.0001519/2.535, allocations: 82.62 kB / 1.571 GB, free: 309.5 MB / 1.279 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt tearingSystem (initialization): time 0.001448/2.536, allocations: 0.7093 MB / 1.572 GB, free: 309.3 MB / 1.279 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt solveSimpleEquations (initialization): time 0.005446/2.542, allocations: 1.477 MB / 1.573 GB, free: 309.2 MB / 1.279 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt calculateStrongComponentJacobians (initialization): time 0.009702/2.552, allocations: 14.52 MB / 1.587 GB, free: 297.7 MB / 1.279 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyAllExpressions (initialization): time 0.009853/2.561, allocations: 1.18 MB / 1.589 GB, free: 297.7 MB / 1.279 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt collapseArrayExpressions (initialization): time 0.001349/2.563, allocations: 280.1 kB / 1.589 GB, free: 297.6 MB / 1.279 GB Warning: The initial conditions are over specified. The following 8 initial equations are redundant, so they are removed from the initialization_lambda0 system: sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3]) sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3]) sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3]) sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]). Notification: Model statistics after passing the back-end for initialization: * Number of independent subsystems: 384 * Number of states: 0 () * Number of discrete variables: 5 ($PRE.pulse.count,$PRE.pulse.T_start,pulse.count,pulse.T_start,$whenCondition1) * Number of discrete states: 0 () * Number of clocked states: 0 () * Top-level inputs: 0 Notification: Strong component statistics for initialization (635): * Single equations (assignments): 627 * Array equations: 0 * Algorithm blocks: 1 * Record equations: 0 * When equations: 0 * If-equations: 0 * Equation systems (not torn): 0 * Torn equation systems: 7 * Mixed (continuous/discrete) equation systems: 0 Notification: Torn system details for strict tearing set: * Linear torn systems (#iteration vars, #inner vars, density): 7 systems {(1,9,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,9,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%)} * Non-linear torn systems (#iteration vars, #inner vars): 0 systems Notification: Performance of prepare postOptimizeDAE: time 0.002258/2.565, allocations: 0.7565 MB / 1.59 GB, free: 297.2 MB / 1.279 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt lateInlineFunction (simulation): time 0.002808/2.568, allocations: 0.6615 MB / 1.59 GB, free: 297.2 MB / 1.279 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt wrapFunctionCalls (simulation): time 0.01018/2.578, allocations: 5.145 MB / 1.595 GB, free: 295.5 MB / 1.279 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt inlineArrayEqn (simulation): time 2.666e-05/2.578, allocations: 29.53 kB / 1.595 GB, free: 295.5 MB / 1.279 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt constantLinearSystem (simulation): time 2.715e-05/2.578, allocations: 7.438 kB / 1.595 GB, free: 295.5 MB / 1.279 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifysemiLinear (simulation): time 0.005437/2.584, allocations: 3.966 MB / 1.599 GB, free: 294.3 MB / 1.279 GB Warning: The model contains alias variables with redundant start and/or conflicting nominal values. It is recommended to resolve the conflicts, because otherwise the system could be hard to solve. To print the conflicting alias sets and the chosen candidates please use -d=aliasConflicts. Notification: Performance of postOpt removeSimpleEquations (simulation): time 0.02787/2.612, allocations: 13.41 MB / 1.612 GB, free: 286.3 MB / 1.279 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyComplexFunction (simulation): time 1.501e-05/2.612, allocations: 0 / 1.612 GB, free: 286.3 MB / 1.279 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt solveSimpleEquations (simulation): time 0.002449/2.614, allocations: 0.6006 MB / 1.613 GB, free: 285.7 MB / 1.279 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt tearingSystem (simulation): time 0.001392/2.616, allocations: 0.5797 MB / 1.613 GB, free: 285.2 MB / 1.279 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt inputDerivativesUsed (simulation): time 0.0004176/2.616, allocations: 135 kB / 1.613 GB, free: 285 MB / 1.279 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt calculateStrongComponentJacobians (simulation): time 0.008966/2.625, allocations: 14.38 MB / 1.628 GB, free: 269.8 MB / 1.279 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt calculateStateSetsJacobians (simulation): time 5.25e-06/2.625, allocations: 15.53 kB / 1.628 GB, free: 269.8 MB / 1.279 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt symbolicJacobian (simulation): time 0.01191/2.637, allocations: 7.117 MB / 1.634 GB, free: 262.9 MB / 1.279 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt removeConstants (simulation): time 0.00481/2.642, allocations: 1.664 MB / 1.636 GB, free: 261.3 MB / 1.279 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyTimeIndepFuncCalls (simulation): time 0.002758/2.645, allocations: 127.9 kB / 1.636 GB, free: 261.1 MB / 1.279 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyAllExpressions (simulation): time 0.005917/2.65, allocations: 0.6064 MB / 1.637 GB, free: 260.5 MB / 1.279 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt findZeroCrossings (simulation): time 0.0005974/2.651, allocations: 169.2 kB / 1.637 GB, free: 260.4 MB / 1.279 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt collapseArrayExpressions (simulation): time 0.000333/2.651, allocations: 79.95 kB / 1.637 GB, free: 260.3 MB / 1.279 GB Notification: Performance of sorting global known variables: time 0.01449/2.666, allocations: 7.338 MB / 1.644 GB, free: 253 MB / 1.279 GB Notification: Performance of sort global known variables: time 7.12e-07/2.666, allocations: 0 / 1.644 GB, free: 253 MB / 1.279 GB Notification: Performance of remove unused functions: time 0.01788/2.684, allocations: 3.962 MB / 1.648 GB, free: 249 MB / 1.279 GB Notification: Model statistics after passing the back-end for simulation: * Number of independent subsystems: 12 * Number of states: 43 (sla.vol[1].dynBal.U,sla.vol[2].dynBal.U,sla.vol[3].dynBal.U,sla.vol[4].dynBal.U,sla.vol[5].dynBal.U,sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_b[1].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[2].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[3].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[4].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[5].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T[3],TOut.T) * Number of discrete variables: 3 ($whenCondition1,pulse.T_start,pulse.count) * Number of discrete states: 1 (pulse.count) * Number of clocked states: 0 () * Top-level inputs: 0 Notification: Strong component statistics for simulation (210): * Single equations (assignments): 199 * Array equations: 0 * Algorithm blocks: 0 * Record equations: 2 * When equations: 2 * If-equations: 0 * Equation systems (not torn): 0 * Torn equation systems: 7 * Mixed (continuous/discrete) equation systems: 0 Notification: Torn system details for strict tearing set: * Linear torn systems (#iteration vars, #inner vars, density): 7 systems {(1,9,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,9,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%)} * Non-linear torn systems (#iteration vars, #inner vars): 0 systems Notification: Performance of Backend phase and start with SimCode phase: time 0.002446/2.686, allocations: 0.5932 MB / 1.649 GB, free: 248.6 MB / 1.279 GB Notification: Performance of simCode: created initialization part: time 0.01913/2.705, allocations: 13.43 MB / 1.662 GB, free: 235 MB / 1.279 GB Notification: Performance of simCode: created event and clocks part: time 1.112e-05/2.706, allocations: 0 / 1.662 GB, free: 235 MB / 1.279 GB Notification: Performance of simCode: created simulation system equations: time 0.004168/2.71, allocations: 3.037 MB / 1.665 GB, free: 231.8 MB / 1.279 GB Notification: Performance of simCode: created of all other equations (e.g. parameter, nominal, assert, etc): time 0.01748/2.727, allocations: 2.934 MB / 1.668 GB, free: 229 MB / 1.279 GB Notification: Performance of simCode: created linear, non-linear and system jacobian parts: time 0.03349/2.761, allocations: 19.02 MB / 1.686 GB, free: 210 MB / 1.279 GB Notification: Performance of simCode: some other stuff during SimCode phase: time 0.008855/2.77, allocations: 5.369 MB / 1.691 GB, free: 204.6 MB / 1.279 GB Notification: Performance of simCode: all other stuff during SimCode phase: time 0.003256/2.773, allocations: 461.7 kB / 1.692 GB, free: 204.1 MB / 1.279 GB Notification: Performance of SimCode: time 1.042e-06/2.773, allocations: 0 / 1.692 GB, free: 204.1 MB / 1.279 GB Notification: Performance of Templates: time 1.328/4.101, allocations: 478.7 MB / 2.159 GB, free: 0.5136 GB / 1.514 GB make -j1 -f Buildings_latest_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference.makefile (rm -f Buildings_latest_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference.pipe ; mkfifo Buildings_latest_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference.pipe ; head -c 1048576 < Buildings_latest_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference.pipe >> ../files/Buildings_latest_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference.sim & ./Buildings_latest_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference -abortSlowSimulation -alarm=480 -emit_protected -lv LOG_STATS > Buildings_latest_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference.pipe 2>&1) diffSimulationResults("Buildings_latest_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference_res.mat","/mnt/ReferenceFiles/Buildings/csv/master/Buildings_Fluid_HeatExchangers_RadiantSlabs_Examples_StepResponseFiniteDifference.csv","/var/lib/jenkins1/ws/OpenModelicaLibraryTestingWork/OpenModelicaLibraryTesting/files/Buildings_latest_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference.diff",relTol=0.003,relTolDiffMinMax=0.003,rangeDelta=0.001) Reference file matches