Running: ./testmodel.py --libraries=/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries --ompython_omhome=/usr Buildings_9_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference.conf.json
loadFile("/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/ModelicaServices 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo", uses=false)
loadFile("/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Complex 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo", uses=false)
loadFile("/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Modelica 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo", uses=false)
loadFile("/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Buildings 9.1.3-maint.9.1.x/package.mo", uses=false)
Using package Buildings with version 9.1.3 (/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Buildings 9.1.3-maint.9.1.x/package.mo)
Using package Modelica with version 4.0.0 (/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Modelica 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo)
Using package Complex with version 4.0.0 (/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Complex 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo)
Using package ModelicaServices with version 4.0.0 (/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/ModelicaServices 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo)
Running command: translateModel(Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference,tolerance=1e-06,outputFormat="mat",numberOfIntervals=5000,variableFilter="time|sla.sta_b.T|sla.surf_a.T|sla.surf_b.T|sla.surf_a.Q_flow|sla.surf_b.Q_flow",fileNamePrefix="Buildings_9_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference")
translateModel(Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference,tolerance=1e-06,outputFormat="mat",numberOfIntervals=5000,variableFilter="time|sla.sta_b.T|sla.surf_a.T|sla.surf_b.T|sla.surf_a.Q_flow|sla.surf_b.Q_flow",fileNamePrefix="Buildings_9_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference")
Notification: Performance of loadFile(/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/ModelicaServices 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo): time 0.001134/0.001135, allocations: 108.3 kB / 16.41 MB, free: 6.512 MB / 14.72 MB
Notification: Performance of loadFile(/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Complex 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo): time 0.0011/0.0011, allocations: 189.5 kB / 17.34 MB, free: 5.742 MB / 14.72 MB
Notification: Performance of loadFile(/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Modelica 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo): time 1.405/1.405, allocations: 222.9 MB / 241 MB, free: 15.14 MB / 206.1 MB
Notification: Performance of loadFile(/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Buildings 9.1.3-maint.9.1.x/package.mo): time 2.292/2.292, allocations: 390.2 MB / 0.6655 GB, free: 0.6445 MB / 0.5294 GB
Notification: Performance of FrontEnd - loaded program: time 0.001659/0.001659, allocations: 63.91 kB / 0.9516 GB, free: 7.617 MB / 0.7325 GB
Notification: Performance of FrontEnd - Absyn->SCode: time 0.9699/0.9716, allocations: 140.4 MB / 1.089 GB, free: 5.523 MB / 0.8575 GB
Notification: Performance of NFInst.instantiate(Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference): time 0.0375/1.009, allocations: 31.75 MB / 1.12 GB, free: 14.81 MB / 0.8887 GB
Notification: Performance of NFInst.instExpressions: time 0.02319/1.032, allocations: 12.3 MB / 1.132 GB, free: 6.098 MB / 0.8887 GB
Notification: Performance of NFInst.updateImplicitVariability: time 0.003867/1.036, allocations: 60.34 kB / 1.132 GB, free: 6.078 MB / 0.8887 GB
Notification: Performance of NFTyping.typeComponents: time 0.004765/1.041, allocations: 1.119 MB / 1.133 GB, free: 5.48 MB / 0.8887 GB
Notification: Performance of NFTyping.typeBindings: time 0.009085/1.05, allocations: 2.153 MB / 1.135 GB, free: 4.227 MB / 0.8887 GB
Notification: Performance of NFTyping.typeClassSections: time 0.007573/1.058, allocations: 1.874 MB / 1.137 GB, free: 3.293 MB / 0.8887 GB
Notification: Performance of NFFlatten.flatten: time 0.03191/1.09, allocations: 19.58 MB / 1.156 GB, free: 11.09 MB / 0.9044 GB
Notification: Performance of NFFlatten.resolveConnections: time 0.01651/1.106, allocations: 7.194 MB / 1.163 GB, free: 7.789 MB / 0.9044 GB
Notification: Performance of NFEvalConstants.evaluate: time 0.0174/1.124, allocations: 6.531 MB / 1.169 GB, free: 4.477 MB / 0.9044 GB
Notification: Performance of NFSimplifyModel.simplify: time 0.01355/1.137, allocations: 5.355 MB / 1.174 GB, free: 1.254 MB / 0.9044 GB
Notification: Performance of NFPackage.collectConstants: time 0.004199/1.142, allocations: 0.7528 MB / 1.175 GB, free: 1.25 MB / 0.9044 GB
Notification: Performance of NFFlatten.collectFunctions: time 0.0129/1.155, allocations: 3.216 MB / 1.178 GB, free: 15.79 MB / 0.92 GB
Notification: Performance of NFScalarize.scalarize: time 0.006891/1.162, allocations: 2.993 MB / 1.181 GB, free: 13.74 MB / 0.92 GB
Notification: Performance of NFVerifyModel.verify: time 0.01614/1.178, allocations: 4.754 MB / 1.186 GB, free: 10.42 MB / 0.92 GB
Notification: Performance of NFConvertDAE.convert: time 0.02664/1.204, allocations: 15.44 MB / 1.201 GB, free: 10.94 MB / 0.9356 GB
Notification: Performance of FrontEnd - DAE generated: time 7.534e-06/1.204, allocations: 7.938 kB / 1.201 GB, free: 10.93 MB / 0.9356 GB
Notification: Performance of FrontEnd: time 2.134e-06/1.204, allocations: 0 / 1.201 GB, free: 10.93 MB / 0.9356 GB
Notification: Performance of Transformations before backend: time 0.000564/1.205, allocations: 0 / 1.201 GB, free: 10.93 MB / 0.9356 GB
Notification: Model statistics after passing the front-end and creating the data structures used by the back-end:
 * Number of equations: 866
 * Number of variables: 866
Notification: Performance of Generate backend data structure: time 0.03669/1.242, allocations: 11.49 MB / 1.212 GB, free: 15.33 MB / 0.9512 GB
Notification: Performance of prepare preOptimizeDAE: time 5.211e-05/1.242, allocations: 12.02 kB / 1.212 GB, free: 15.32 MB / 0.9512 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt normalInlineFunction (simulation): time 0.005237/1.247, allocations: 0.8764 MB / 1.213 GB, free: 14.43 MB / 0.9512 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt evaluateParameters (simulation): time 0.02423/1.271, allocations: 9.62 MB / 1.223 GB, free: 4.738 MB / 0.9512 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt simplifyIfEquations (simulation): time 0.0004229/1.272, allocations: 338.8 kB / 1.223 GB, free: 4.406 MB / 0.9512 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt expandDerOperator (simulation): time 0.002173/1.274, allocations: 475.8 kB / 1.223 GB, free: 3.941 MB / 0.9512 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt clockPartitioning (simulation): time 0.01291/1.287, allocations: 5.964 MB / 1.229 GB, free: 13.74 MB / 0.9669 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt findStateOrder (simulation): time 8.582e-05/1.287, allocations: 11.88 kB / 1.229 GB, free: 13.73 MB / 0.9669 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt replaceEdgeChange (simulation): time 0.0004404/1.287, allocations: 147.9 kB / 1.229 GB, free: 13.59 MB / 0.9669 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt inlineArrayEqn (simulation): time 9.69e-05/1.288, allocations: 99.98 kB / 1.229 GB, free: 13.49 MB / 0.9669 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt removeEqualRHS (simulation): time 0.008122/1.296, allocations: 4.754 MB / 1.234 GB, free: 8.723 MB / 0.9669 GB
Warning: The model contains alias variables with redundant start and/or conflicting nominal values. It is recommended to resolve the conflicts, because otherwise the system could be hard to solve. To print the conflicting alias sets and the chosen candidates please use -d=aliasConflicts.
Notification: Performance of preOpt removeSimpleEquations (simulation): time 0.05874/1.354, allocations: 33.77 MB / 1.267 GB, free: 5.305 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt comSubExp (simulation): time 0.01191/1.366, allocations: 6.234 MB / 1.273 GB, free: 14.96 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt resolveLoops (simulation): time 0.004527/1.371, allocations: 2.556 MB / 1.276 GB, free: 12.41 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt evalFunc (simulation): time 0.02767/1.399, allocations: 13.23 MB / 1.288 GB, free: 14.63 MB / 1.029 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt encapsulateWhenConditions (simulation): time 0.004182/1.403, allocations: 2.134 MB / 1.291 GB, free: 12.48 MB / 1.029 GB
Notification: Performance of pre-optimization done (n=224): time 5.901e-06/1.403, allocations: 0 / 1.291 GB, free: 12.48 MB / 1.029 GB
Notification: Performance of matching and sorting (n=232): time 0.03258/1.436, allocations: 14.02 MB / 1.304 GB, free: 14.27 MB / 1.045 GB
Notification: Performance of inlineWhenForInitialization (initialization): time 0.0001012/1.436, allocations: 132.8 kB / 1.304 GB, free: 14.12 MB / 1.045 GB
Notification: Performance of selectInitializationVariablesDAE (initialization): time 0.02478/1.46, allocations: 10.42 MB / 1.315 GB, free: 3.699 MB / 1.045 GB
Notification: Performance of collectPreVariables (initialization): time 0.001134/1.462, allocations: 117.7 kB / 1.315 GB, free: 3.578 MB / 1.045 GB
Notification: Performance of collectInitialEqns (initialization): time 0.006135/1.468, allocations: 3.301 MB / 1.318 GB, free: 260 kB / 1.045 GB
Notification: Performance of collectInitialBindings (initialization): time 0.002335/1.47, allocations: 0.8747 MB / 1.319 GB, free: 15.36 MB / 1.061 GB
Notification: Performance of simplifyInitialFunctions (initialization): time 0.003006/1.473, allocations: 1.205 MB / 1.32 GB, free: 14.15 MB / 1.061 GB
Notification: Performance of setup shared object (initialization): time 0.0001021/1.473, allocations: 305.1 kB / 1.32 GB, free: 13.85 MB / 1.061 GB
Notification: Performance of preBalanceInitialSystem (initialization): time 0.004933/1.478, allocations: 3.447 MB / 1.324 GB, free: 10.38 MB / 1.061 GB
Notification: Performance of partitionIndependentBlocks (initialization): time 0.00721/1.486, allocations: 5.936 MB / 1.329 GB, free: 3.242 MB / 1.061 GB
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3]))
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3]))
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3]))
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]))
Notification: Performance of analyzeInitialSystem (initialization): time 0.06448/1.55, allocations: 36.63 MB / 1.365 GB, free: 13.16 MB / 1.107 GB
Notification: Performance of solveInitialSystemEqSystem (initialization): time 7.693e-05/1.55, allocations: 32 kB / 1.365 GB, free: 13.13 MB / 1.107 GB
Notification: Performance of matching and sorting (n=659) (initialization): time 0.02017/1.57, allocations: 10.07 MB / 1.375 GB, free: 2.973 MB / 1.107 GB
Notification: Performance of prepare postOptimizeDAE: time 0.000123/1.571, allocations: 69.64 kB / 1.375 GB, free: 2.898 MB / 1.107 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyComplexFunction (initialization): time 0.0001472/1.571, allocations: 91.94 kB / 1.375 GB, free: 2.809 MB / 1.107 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt tearingSystem (initialization): time 0.001803/1.572, allocations: 0.7089 MB / 1.376 GB, free: 2.078 MB / 1.107 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt solveSimpleEquations (initialization): time 0.005585/1.578, allocations: 1.482 MB / 1.377 GB, free: 0.5938 MB / 1.107 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt calculateStrongComponentJacobians (initialization): time 0.01237/1.59, allocations: 14.52 MB / 1.391 GB, free: 1.09 MB / 1.123 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyAllExpressions (initialization): time 0.01019/1.601, allocations: 1.185 MB / 1.393 GB, free: 15.9 MB / 1.139 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt collapseArrayExpressions (initialization): time 0.001441/1.602, allocations: 275.9 kB / 1.393 GB, free: 15.63 MB / 1.139 GB
Warning: The initial conditions are over specified. The following 8 initial equations are redundant, so they are removed from the initialization system:
         sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start
         sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start
         sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start
         sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start
         sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3])
         sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3])
         sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3])
         sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]).
Notification: Performance of preBalanceInitialSystem (initialization_lambda0): time 0.01439/1.617, allocations: 7.096 MB / 1.4 GB, free: 8.523 MB / 1.139 GB
Notification: Performance of partitionIndependentBlocks (initialization_lambda0): time 0.008534/1.625, allocations: 5.928 MB / 1.406 GB, free: 1.391 MB / 1.139 GB
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3]))
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3]))
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3]))
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]))
Notification: Performance of analyzeInitialSystem (initialization_lambda0): time 0.06214/1.687, allocations: 36.57 MB / 1.441 GB, free: 11.36 MB / 1.186 GB
Notification: Performance of solveInitialSystemEqSystem (initialization_lambda0): time 7.872e-05/1.687, allocations: 27.94 kB / 1.441 GB, free: 11.34 MB / 1.186 GB
Notification: Performance of matching and sorting (n=659) (initialization_lambda0): time 0.01988/1.707, allocations: 10.06 MB / 1.451 GB, free: 1.188 MB / 1.186 GB
Notification: Performance of prepare postOptimizeDAE: time 0.0001212/1.708, allocations: 69.7 kB / 1.451 GB, free: 1.113 MB / 1.186 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyComplexFunction (initialization): time 0.000142/1.708, allocations: 84.84 kB / 1.451 GB, free: 1.031 MB / 1.186 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt tearingSystem (initialization): time 0.001716/1.709, allocations: 0.7084 MB / 1.452 GB, free: 308 kB / 1.186 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt solveSimpleEquations (initialization): time 0.005899/1.715, allocations: 1.482 MB / 1.453 GB, free: 14.82 MB / 1.201 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt calculateStrongComponentJacobians (initialization): time 0.01243/1.728, allocations: 14.52 MB / 1.468 GB, free: 15.32 MB / 1.217 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyAllExpressions (initialization): time 0.00989/1.738, allocations: 1.178 MB / 1.469 GB, free: 14.14 MB / 1.217 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt collapseArrayExpressions (initialization): time 0.001362/1.739, allocations: 276 kB / 1.469 GB, free: 13.87 MB / 1.217 GB
Warning: The initial conditions are over specified. The following 8 initial equations are redundant, so they are removed from the initialization_lambda0 system:
         sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start
         sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start
         sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start
         sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start
         sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3])
         sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3])
         sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3])
         sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]).
Notification: Model statistics after passing the back-end for initialization:
 * Number of independent subsystems: 384
 * Number of states: 0 ()
 * Number of discrete variables: 5 ($PRE.pulse.count,$PRE.pulse.T_start,pulse.count,pulse.T_start,$whenCondition1)
 * Number of discrete states: 0 ()
 * Number of clocked states: 0 ()
 * Top-level inputs: 0
Notification: Strong component statistics for initialization (635):
 * Single equations (assignments): 627
 * Array equations: 0
 * Algorithm blocks: 1
 * Record equations: 0
 * When equations: 0
 * If-equations: 0
 * Equation systems (not torn): 0
 * Torn equation systems: 7
 * Mixed (continuous/discrete) equation systems: 0
Notification: Torn system details for strict tearing set:
 * Linear torn systems (#iteration vars, #inner vars, density): 7 systems
   {(1,9,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,9,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%)}
 * Non-linear torn systems (#iteration vars, #inner vars): 0 systems
Notification: Performance of prepare postOptimizeDAE: time 0.002392/1.741, allocations: 0.7595 MB / 1.47 GB, free: 13.1 MB / 1.217 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt lateInlineFunction (simulation): time 0.002711/1.744, allocations: 0.6633 MB / 1.47 GB, free: 12.43 MB / 1.217 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt wrapFunctionCalls (simulation): time 0.01057/1.755, allocations: 5.149 MB / 1.475 GB, free: 7.242 MB / 1.217 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt inlineArrayEqn (simulation): time 2.831e-05/1.755, allocations: 24 kB / 1.476 GB, free: 7.219 MB / 1.217 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt constantLinearSystem (simulation): time 1.981e-05/1.755, allocations: 4 kB / 1.476 GB, free: 7.215 MB / 1.217 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifysemiLinear (simulation): time 0.006108/1.761, allocations: 3.962 MB / 1.479 GB, free: 3.215 MB / 1.217 GB
Warning: The model contains alias variables with redundant start and/or conflicting nominal values. It is recommended to resolve the conflicts, because otherwise the system could be hard to solve. To print the conflicting alias sets and the chosen candidates please use -d=aliasConflicts.
Notification: Performance of postOpt removeSimpleEquations (simulation): time 0.03021/1.791, allocations: 13.42 MB / 1.492 GB, free: 5.566 MB / 1.232 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyComplexFunction (simulation): time 1.552e-05/1.791, allocations: 11.88 kB / 1.493 GB, free: 5.555 MB / 1.232 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt solveSimpleEquations (simulation): time 0.00267/1.794, allocations: 0.5929 MB / 1.493 GB, free: 4.961 MB / 1.232 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt tearingSystem (simulation): time 0.00159/1.796, allocations: 0.5757 MB / 1.494 GB, free: 4.363 MB / 1.232 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt inputDerivativesUsed (simulation): time 0.0004601/1.796, allocations: 135.9 kB / 1.494 GB, free: 4.23 MB / 1.232 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt calculateStrongComponentJacobians (simulation): time 0.01191/1.808, allocations: 14.39 MB / 1.508 GB, free: 4.859 MB / 1.248 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt calculateStateSetsJacobians (simulation): time 9.087e-06/1.808, allocations: 12.19 kB / 1.508 GB, free: 4.848 MB / 1.248 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt symbolicJacobian (simulation): time 0.01318/1.821, allocations: 7.11 MB / 1.515 GB, free: 13.64 MB / 1.264 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt removeConstants (simulation): time 0.006557/1.828, allocations: 1.664 MB / 1.516 GB, free: 11.95 MB / 1.264 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyTimeIndepFuncCalls (simulation): time 0.002906/1.831, allocations: 127.9 kB / 1.517 GB, free: 11.83 MB / 1.264 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyAllExpressions (simulation): time 0.005991/1.837, allocations: 0.6121 MB / 1.517 GB, free: 11.21 MB / 1.264 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt findZeroCrossings (simulation): time 0.0006393/1.837, allocations: 177.6 kB / 1.517 GB, free: 11.04 MB / 1.264 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt collapseArrayExpressions (simulation): time 0.0003893/1.838, allocations: 83.95 kB / 1.517 GB, free: 10.96 MB / 1.264 GB
Notification: Performance of sorting global known variables: time 0.01596/1.854, allocations: 7.335 MB / 1.525 GB, free: 3.637 MB / 1.264 GB
Notification: Performance of sort global known variables: time 4.31e-07/1.854, allocations: 0 / 1.525 GB, free: 3.637 MB / 1.264 GB
Notification: Performance of remove unused functions: time 0.01795/1.872, allocations: 3.961 MB / 1.528 GB, free: 15.67 MB / 1.279 GB
Notification: Model statistics after passing the back-end for simulation:
 * Number of independent subsystems: 12
 * Number of states: 43 (sla.vol[1].dynBal.U,sla.vol[2].dynBal.U,sla.vol[3].dynBal.U,sla.vol[4].dynBal.U,sla.vol[5].dynBal.U,sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_b[1].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[2].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[3].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[4].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[5].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T[3],TOut.T)
 * Number of discrete variables: 3 ($whenCondition1,pulse.T_start,pulse.count)
 * Number of discrete states: 1 (pulse.count)
 * Number of clocked states: 0 ()
 * Top-level inputs: 0
Notification: Strong component statistics for simulation (210):
 * Single equations (assignments): 199
 * Array equations: 0
 * Algorithm blocks: 0
 * Record equations: 2
 * When equations: 2
 * If-equations: 0
 * Equation systems (not torn): 0
 * Torn equation systems: 7
 * Mixed (continuous/discrete) equation systems: 0
Notification: Torn system details for strict tearing set:
 * Linear torn systems (#iteration vars, #inner vars, density): 7 systems
   {(1,9,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,9,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%)}
 * Non-linear torn systems (#iteration vars, #inner vars): 0 systems
Notification: Performance of Backend phase and start with SimCode phase: time 0.002273/1.874, allocations: 0.5891 MB / 1.529 GB, free: 15.1 MB / 1.279 GB
Notification: Performance of simCode: created initialization part: time 0.02356/1.898, allocations: 13.43 MB / 1.542 GB, free: 1.484 MB / 1.279 GB
Notification: Performance of simCode: created event and clocks part: time 1.148e-05/1.898, allocations: 0 / 1.542 GB, free: 1.484 MB / 1.279 GB
Notification: Performance of simCode: created simulation system equations: time 0.005053/1.903, allocations: 3.036 MB / 1.545 GB, free: 14.35 MB / 1.295 GB
Notification: Performance of simCode: created of all other equations (e.g. parameter, nominal, assert, etc): time 0.01958/1.922, allocations: 2.937 MB / 1.548 GB, free: 11.46 MB / 1.295 GB
Notification: Performance of simCode: created linear, non-linear and system jacobian parts: time 0.03923/1.962, allocations: 19.03 MB / 1.567 GB, free: 8.363 MB / 1.311 GB
Notification: Performance of simCode: some other stuff during SimCode phase: time 0.006474/1.968, allocations: 5.362 MB / 1.572 GB, free: 2.957 MB / 1.311 GB
Notification: Performance of simCode: all other stuff during SimCode phase: time 0.002846/1.971, allocations: 455.4 kB / 1.572 GB, free: 2.512 MB / 1.311 GB
Notification: Performance of SimCode: time 1.022e-06/1.971, allocations: 0 / 1.572 GB, free: 2.512 MB / 1.311 GB
Notification: Performance of Templates: time 1.122/3.093, allocations: 478.6 MB / 2.04 GB, free: 11.9 MB / 1.326 GB
make -j1 -f Buildings_9_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference.makefile
(rm -f Buildings_9_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference.pipe ; mkfifo Buildings_9_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference.pipe ; head -c 1048576 < Buildings_9_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference.pipe >> ../files/Buildings_9_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference.sim & ./Buildings_9_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference  -abortSlowSimulation -alarm=480  -emit_protected -lv LOG_STATS > Buildings_9_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference.pipe 2>&1)
diffSimulationResults("Buildings_9_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference_res.mat","/mnt/ReferenceFiles/Buildings/csv/maint_9.1.x/Buildings_Fluid_HeatExchangers_RadiantSlabs_Examples_StepResponseFiniteDifference.csv","/var/lib/jenkins1/ws/OpenModelicaLibraryTestingWork/OpenModelicaLibraryTesting/files/Buildings_9_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference.diff",relTol=0.003,relTolDiffMinMax=0.003,rangeDelta=0.001)
Reference file matches