Running: ./testmodel.py --libraries=/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries --ompython_omhome=/usr Buildings_9_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.conf.json loadFile("/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/ModelicaServices 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo", uses=false) loadFile("/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Complex 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo", uses=false) loadFile("/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Modelica 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo", uses=false) loadFile("/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Buildings 9.1.3-maint.9.1.x/package.mo", uses=false) Using package Buildings with version 9.1.3 (/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Buildings 9.1.3-maint.9.1.x/package.mo) Using package Modelica with version 4.0.0 (/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Modelica 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo) Using package Complex with version 4.0.0 (/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Complex 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo) Using package ModelicaServices with version 4.0.0 (/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/ModelicaServices 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo) Running command: translateModel(Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU,tolerance=1e-06,outputFormat="mat",numberOfIntervals=5000,variableFilter="time|sla.sta_b.T|sla.surf_a.T|sla.surf_b.T|sla.surf_a.Q_flow|sla.surf_b.Q_flow",fileNamePrefix="Buildings_9_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU") translateModel(Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU,tolerance=1e-06,outputFormat="mat",numberOfIntervals=5000,variableFilter="time|sla.sta_b.T|sla.surf_a.T|sla.surf_b.T|sla.surf_a.Q_flow|sla.surf_b.Q_flow",fileNamePrefix="Buildings_9_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU") Notification: Performance of loadFile(/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/ModelicaServices 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo): time 0.001111/0.001111, allocations: 109.9 kB / 16.41 MB, free: 6.492 MB / 14.72 MB Notification: Performance of loadFile(/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Complex 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo): time 0.001101/0.001101, allocations: 183 kB / 17.34 MB, free: 5.766 MB / 14.72 MB Notification: Performance of loadFile(/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Modelica 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo): time 1.371/1.371, allocations: 222.9 MB / 241 MB, free: 15.14 MB / 206.1 MB Notification: Performance of loadFile(/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Buildings 9.1.3-maint.9.1.x/package.mo): time 2.238/2.238, allocations: 390.3 MB / 0.6655 GB, free: 0.6328 MB / 0.5294 GB Notification: Performance of FrontEnd - loaded program: time 0.001602/0.001602, allocations: 59.91 kB / 0.9515 GB, free: 7.594 MB / 0.7325 GB Notification: Performance of FrontEnd - Absyn->SCode: time 1.026/1.028, allocations: 140.4 MB / 1.089 GB, free: 5.484 MB / 0.8575 GB Notification: Performance of NFInst.instantiate(Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU): time 0.03674/1.064, allocations: 31.75 MB / 1.12 GB, free: 14.77 MB / 0.8887 GB Notification: Performance of NFInst.instExpressions: time 0.02264/1.087, allocations: 12.29 MB / 1.132 GB, free: 6.07 MB / 0.8887 GB Notification: Performance of NFInst.updateImplicitVariability: time 0.0034/1.091, allocations: 71.59 kB / 1.132 GB, free: 6.039 MB / 0.8887 GB Notification: Performance of NFTyping.typeComponents: time 0.004358/1.095, allocations: 1.115 MB / 1.133 GB, free: 5.445 MB / 0.8887 GB Notification: Performance of NFTyping.typeBindings: time 0.008058/1.103, allocations: 2.155 MB / 1.135 GB, free: 4.191 MB / 0.8887 GB Notification: Performance of NFTyping.typeClassSections: time 0.007313/1.11, allocations: 1.869 MB / 1.137 GB, free: 3.262 MB / 0.8887 GB Notification: Performance of NFFlatten.flatten: time 0.03064/1.141, allocations: 19.57 MB / 1.156 GB, free: 11.07 MB / 0.9044 GB Notification: Performance of NFFlatten.resolveConnections: time 0.01354/1.155, allocations: 7.2 MB / 1.163 GB, free: 7.762 MB / 0.9044 GB Notification: Performance of NFEvalConstants.evaluate: time 0.01575/1.17, allocations: 6.537 MB / 1.169 GB, free: 4.441 MB / 0.9044 GB Notification: Performance of NFSimplifyModel.simplify: time 0.01211/1.183, allocations: 5.344 MB / 1.174 GB, free: 1.23 MB / 0.9044 GB Notification: Performance of NFPackage.collectConstants: time 0.003643/1.186, allocations: 0.7491 MB / 1.175 GB, free: 1.23 MB / 0.9044 GB Notification: Performance of NFFlatten.collectFunctions: time 0.0112/1.197, allocations: 3.224 MB / 1.178 GB, free: 15.76 MB / 0.92 GB Notification: Performance of NFScalarize.scalarize: time 0.006328/1.204, allocations: 3.001 MB / 1.181 GB, free: 13.71 MB / 0.92 GB Notification: Performance of NFVerifyModel.verify: time 0.01394/1.218, allocations: 4.75 MB / 1.186 GB, free: 10.38 MB / 0.92 GB Notification: Performance of NFConvertDAE.convert: time 0.02356/1.241, allocations: 15.44 MB / 1.201 GB, free: 10.9 MB / 0.9356 GB Notification: Performance of FrontEnd - DAE generated: time 7.093e-06/1.241, allocations: 0 / 1.201 GB, free: 10.9 MB / 0.9356 GB Notification: Performance of FrontEnd: time 1.783e-06/1.241, allocations: 0 / 1.201 GB, free: 10.9 MB / 0.9356 GB Notification: Performance of Transformations before backend: time 0.0005042/1.242, allocations: 0 / 1.201 GB, free: 10.9 MB / 0.9356 GB Notification: Model statistics after passing the front-end and creating the data structures used by the back-end: * Number of equations: 866 * Number of variables: 866 Notification: Performance of Generate backend data structure: time 0.0329/1.275, allocations: 11.5 MB / 1.212 GB, free: 15.29 MB / 0.9512 GB Notification: Performance of prepare preOptimizeDAE: time 4.771e-05/1.275, allocations: 12.03 kB / 1.212 GB, free: 15.28 MB / 0.9512 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt normalInlineFunction (simulation): time 0.004755/1.28, allocations: 0.8803 MB / 1.213 GB, free: 14.39 MB / 0.9512 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt evaluateParameters (simulation): time 0.02242/1.302, allocations: 9.613 MB / 1.222 GB, free: 4.699 MB / 0.9512 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt simplifyIfEquations (simulation): time 0.000353/1.303, allocations: 330.8 kB / 1.223 GB, free: 4.375 MB / 0.9512 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt expandDerOperator (simulation): time 0.001788/1.304, allocations: 491.8 kB / 1.223 GB, free: 3.895 MB / 0.9512 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt clockPartitioning (simulation): time 0.01276/1.317, allocations: 5.956 MB / 1.229 GB, free: 13.7 MB / 0.9669 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt findStateOrder (simulation): time 0.00014/1.317, allocations: 15.94 kB / 1.229 GB, free: 13.69 MB / 0.9669 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt replaceEdgeChange (simulation): time 0.0009228/1.318, allocations: 147.9 kB / 1.229 GB, free: 13.54 MB / 0.9669 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt inlineArrayEqn (simulation): time 0.0001148/1.318, allocations: 91.98 kB / 1.229 GB, free: 13.45 MB / 0.9669 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt removeEqualRHS (simulation): time 0.009949/1.328, allocations: 4.762 MB / 1.234 GB, free: 8.68 MB / 0.9669 GB Warning: The model contains alias variables with redundant start and/or conflicting nominal values. It is recommended to resolve the conflicts, because otherwise the system could be hard to solve. To print the conflicting alias sets and the chosen candidates please use -d=aliasConflicts. Notification: Performance of preOpt removeSimpleEquations (simulation): time 0.07036/1.399, allocations: 33.76 MB / 1.267 GB, free: 5.266 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt comSubExp (simulation): time 0.01318/1.412, allocations: 6.238 MB / 1.273 GB, free: 14.92 MB / 1.014 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt resolveLoops (simulation): time 0.004627/1.417, allocations: 2.548 MB / 1.276 GB, free: 12.37 MB / 1.014 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt evalFunc (simulation): time 0.02921/1.446, allocations: 13.23 MB / 1.288 GB, free: 14.59 MB / 1.029 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt encapsulateWhenConditions (simulation): time 0.004679/1.451, allocations: 2.134 MB / 1.291 GB, free: 12.44 MB / 1.029 GB Notification: Performance of pre-optimization done (n=224): time 6.733e-06/1.451, allocations: 0 / 1.291 GB, free: 12.44 MB / 1.029 GB Notification: Performance of matching and sorting (n=232): time 0.03629/1.487, allocations: 14.02 MB / 1.304 GB, free: 14.23 MB / 1.045 GB Notification: Performance of inlineWhenForInitialization (initialization): time 9.576e-05/1.487, allocations: 136.7 kB / 1.304 GB, free: 14.07 MB / 1.045 GB Notification: Performance of selectInitializationVariablesDAE (initialization): time 0.0251/1.512, allocations: 10.42 MB / 1.315 GB, free: 3.656 MB / 1.045 GB Notification: Performance of collectPreVariables (initialization): time 0.00116/1.513, allocations: 117.7 kB / 1.315 GB, free: 3.535 MB / 1.045 GB Notification: Performance of collectInitialEqns (initialization): time 0.006095/1.52, allocations: 3.293 MB / 1.318 GB, free: 224 kB / 1.045 GB Notification: Performance of collectInitialBindings (initialization): time 0.00235/1.522, allocations: 0.8786 MB / 1.319 GB, free: 15.32 MB / 1.061 GB Notification: Performance of simplifyInitialFunctions (initialization): time 0.004502/1.526, allocations: 1.205 MB / 1.32 GB, free: 14.11 MB / 1.061 GB Notification: Performance of setup shared object (initialization): time 0.0001231/1.527, allocations: 301.1 kB / 1.32 GB, free: 13.81 MB / 1.061 GB Notification: Performance of preBalanceInitialSystem (initialization): time 0.00633/1.533, allocations: 3.455 MB / 1.324 GB, free: 10.34 MB / 1.061 GB Notification: Performance of partitionIndependentBlocks (initialization): time 0.008341/1.541, allocations: 5.932 MB / 1.329 GB, free: 3.203 MB / 1.061 GB Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3])) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3])) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3])) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3])) Notification: Performance of analyzeInitialSystem (initialization): time 0.06276/1.604, allocations: 36.63 MB / 1.365 GB, free: 13.12 MB / 1.107 GB Notification: Performance of solveInitialSystemEqSystem (initialization): time 8.077e-05/1.604, allocations: 24 kB / 1.365 GB, free: 13.09 MB / 1.107 GB Notification: Performance of matching and sorting (n=659) (initialization): time 0.0207/1.625, allocations: 10.08 MB / 1.375 GB, free: 2.93 MB / 1.107 GB Notification: Performance of prepare postOptimizeDAE: time 0.0001621/1.625, allocations: 68.05 kB / 1.375 GB, free: 2.859 MB / 1.107 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyComplexFunction (initialization): time 0.0001623/1.625, allocations: 88.91 kB / 1.375 GB, free: 2.773 MB / 1.107 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt tearingSystem (initialization): time 0.001908/1.627, allocations: 0.7162 MB / 1.376 GB, free: 2.035 MB / 1.107 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt solveSimpleEquations (initialization): time 0.006219/1.633, allocations: 1.482 MB / 1.377 GB, free: 0.5508 MB / 1.107 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt calculateStrongComponentJacobians (initialization): time 0.01331/1.647, allocations: 14.52 MB / 1.391 GB, free: 1.055 MB / 1.123 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyAllExpressions (initialization): time 0.01033/1.657, allocations: 1.182 MB / 1.393 GB, free: 15.87 MB / 1.139 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt collapseArrayExpressions (initialization): time 0.001482/1.659, allocations: 279.9 kB / 1.393 GB, free: 15.6 MB / 1.139 GB Warning: The initial conditions are over specified. The following 8 initial equations are redundant, so they are removed from the initialization system: sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3]) sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3]) sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3]) sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]). Notification: Performance of preBalanceInitialSystem (initialization_lambda0): time 0.01353/1.672, allocations: 7.084 MB / 1.4 GB, free: 8.5 MB / 1.139 GB Notification: Performance of partitionIndependentBlocks (initialization_lambda0): time 0.008528/1.681, allocations: 5.924 MB / 1.406 GB, free: 1.371 MB / 1.139 GB Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3])) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3])) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3])) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3])) Notification: Performance of analyzeInitialSystem (initialization_lambda0): time 0.06245/1.743, allocations: 36.57 MB / 1.441 GB, free: 11.34 MB / 1.186 GB Notification: Performance of solveInitialSystemEqSystem (initialization_lambda0): time 8.76e-05/1.743, allocations: 27.94 kB / 1.441 GB, free: 11.31 MB / 1.186 GB Notification: Performance of matching and sorting (n=659) (initialization_lambda0): time 0.02061/1.764, allocations: 10.08 MB / 1.451 GB, free: 1.152 MB / 1.186 GB Notification: Performance of prepare postOptimizeDAE: time 0.0001363/1.764, allocations: 73.95 kB / 1.451 GB, free: 1.074 MB / 1.186 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyComplexFunction (initialization): time 0.0001614/1.764, allocations: 84 kB / 1.451 GB, free: 0.9922 MB / 1.186 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt tearingSystem (initialization): time 0.001812/1.766, allocations: 0.7122 MB / 1.452 GB, free: 264 kB / 1.186 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt solveSimpleEquations (initialization): time 0.005518/1.772, allocations: 1.474 MB / 1.453 GB, free: 14.78 MB / 1.201 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt calculateStrongComponentJacobians (initialization): time 0.01272/1.784, allocations: 14.52 MB / 1.468 GB, free: 15.28 MB / 1.217 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyAllExpressions (initialization): time 0.009975/1.795, allocations: 1.178 MB / 1.469 GB, free: 14.1 MB / 1.217 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt collapseArrayExpressions (initialization): time 0.001331/1.796, allocations: 276 kB / 1.469 GB, free: 13.83 MB / 1.217 GB Warning: The initial conditions are over specified. The following 8 initial equations are redundant, so they are removed from the initialization_lambda0 system: sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3]) sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3]) sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3]) sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]). Notification: Model statistics after passing the back-end for initialization: * Number of independent subsystems: 384 * Number of states: 0 () * Number of discrete variables: 5 ($PRE.pulse.count,$PRE.pulse.T_start,pulse.count,pulse.T_start,$whenCondition1) * Number of discrete states: 0 () * Number of clocked states: 0 () * Top-level inputs: 0 Notification: Strong component statistics for initialization (635): * Single equations (assignments): 627 * Array equations: 0 * Algorithm blocks: 1 * Record equations: 0 * When equations: 0 * If-equations: 0 * Equation systems (not torn): 0 * Torn equation systems: 7 * Mixed (continuous/discrete) equation systems: 0 Notification: Torn system details for strict tearing set: * Linear torn systems (#iteration vars, #inner vars, density): 7 systems {(1,9,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,9,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%)} * Non-linear torn systems (#iteration vars, #inner vars): 0 systems Notification: Performance of prepare postOptimizeDAE: time 0.002469/1.798, allocations: 0.7588 MB / 1.47 GB, free: 13.06 MB / 1.217 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt lateInlineFunction (simulation): time 0.00299/1.801, allocations: 0.6633 MB / 1.47 GB, free: 12.39 MB / 1.217 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt wrapFunctionCalls (simulation): time 0.01091/1.812, allocations: 5.147 MB / 1.475 GB, free: 7.211 MB / 1.217 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt inlineArrayEqn (simulation): time 2.948e-05/1.812, allocations: 28 kB / 1.475 GB, free: 7.184 MB / 1.217 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt constantLinearSystem (simulation): time 2.13e-05/1.812, allocations: 4 kB / 1.475 GB, free: 7.18 MB / 1.217 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifysemiLinear (simulation): time 0.006073/1.818, allocations: 3.958 MB / 1.479 GB, free: 3.184 MB / 1.217 GB Warning: The model contains alias variables with redundant start and/or conflicting nominal values. It is recommended to resolve the conflicts, because otherwise the system could be hard to solve. To print the conflicting alias sets and the chosen candidates please use -d=aliasConflicts. Notification: Performance of postOpt removeSimpleEquations (simulation): time 0.02929/1.848, allocations: 13.43 MB / 1.492 GB, free: 5.527 MB / 1.232 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyComplexFunction (simulation): time 1.654e-05/1.848, allocations: 3.938 kB / 1.492 GB, free: 5.523 MB / 1.232 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt solveSimpleEquations (simulation): time 0.002644/1.85, allocations: 0.6049 MB / 1.493 GB, free: 4.918 MB / 1.232 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt tearingSystem (simulation): time 0.001614/1.852, allocations: 0.5833 MB / 1.494 GB, free: 4.312 MB / 1.232 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt inputDerivativesUsed (simulation): time 0.0004408/1.853, allocations: 131.9 kB / 1.494 GB, free: 4.184 MB / 1.232 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt calculateStrongComponentJacobians (simulation): time 0.01198/1.865, allocations: 14.37 MB / 1.508 GB, free: 4.824 MB / 1.248 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt calculateStateSetsJacobians (simulation): time 3.787e-06/1.865, allocations: 4 kB / 1.508 GB, free: 4.82 MB / 1.248 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt symbolicJacobian (simulation): time 0.01289/1.877, allocations: 7.118 MB / 1.515 GB, free: 13.61 MB / 1.264 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt removeConstants (simulation): time 0.004981/1.883, allocations: 1.664 MB / 1.516 GB, free: 11.92 MB / 1.264 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyTimeIndepFuncCalls (simulation): time 0.002677/1.885, allocations: 123.9 kB / 1.516 GB, free: 11.8 MB / 1.264 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyAllExpressions (simulation): time 0.006016/1.891, allocations: 0.6238 MB / 1.517 GB, free: 11.17 MB / 1.264 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt findZeroCrossings (simulation): time 0.0007139/1.892, allocations: 170 kB / 1.517 GB, free: 11.01 MB / 1.264 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt collapseArrayExpressions (simulation): time 0.0004243/1.892, allocations: 83.95 kB / 1.517 GB, free: 10.93 MB / 1.264 GB Notification: Performance of sorting global known variables: time 0.01616/1.909, allocations: 7.331 MB / 1.525 GB, free: 3.605 MB / 1.264 GB Notification: Performance of sort global known variables: time 8.41e-07/1.909, allocations: 0 / 1.525 GB, free: 3.605 MB / 1.264 GB Notification: Performance of remove unused functions: time 0.01834/1.927, allocations: 3.965 MB / 1.528 GB, free: 15.64 MB / 1.279 GB Notification: Model statistics after passing the back-end for simulation: * Number of independent subsystems: 12 * Number of states: 43 (sla.vol[1].dynBal.U,sla.vol[2].dynBal.U,sla.vol[3].dynBal.U,sla.vol[4].dynBal.U,sla.vol[5].dynBal.U,sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_b[1].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[2].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[3].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[4].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[5].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T[3],TOut.T) * Number of discrete variables: 3 ($whenCondition1,pulse.T_start,pulse.count) * Number of discrete states: 1 (pulse.count) * Number of clocked states: 0 () * Top-level inputs: 0 Notification: Strong component statistics for simulation (210): * Single equations (assignments): 199 * Array equations: 0 * Algorithm blocks: 0 * Record equations: 2 * When equations: 2 * If-equations: 0 * Equation systems (not torn): 0 * Torn equation systems: 7 * Mixed (continuous/discrete) equation systems: 0 Notification: Torn system details for strict tearing set: * Linear torn systems (#iteration vars, #inner vars, density): 7 systems {(1,9,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,9,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%)} * Non-linear torn systems (#iteration vars, #inner vars): 0 systems Notification: Performance of Backend phase and start with SimCode phase: time 0.00247/1.93, allocations: 0.5919 MB / 1.529 GB, free: 15.05 MB / 1.279 GB Notification: Performance of simCode: created initialization part: time 0.02312/1.953, allocations: 13.43 MB / 1.542 GB, free: 1.445 MB / 1.279 GB Notification: Performance of simCode: created event and clocks part: time 1.362e-05/1.953, allocations: 3.938 kB / 1.542 GB, free: 1.441 MB / 1.279 GB Notification: Performance of simCode: created simulation system equations: time 0.005273/1.958, allocations: 3.028 MB / 1.545 GB, free: 14.31 MB / 1.295 GB Notification: Performance of simCode: created of all other equations (e.g. parameter, nominal, assert, etc): time 0.01686/1.975, allocations: 2.939 MB / 1.548 GB, free: 11.42 MB / 1.295 GB Notification: Performance of simCode: created linear, non-linear and system jacobian parts: time 0.03559/2.011, allocations: 19.02 MB / 1.566 GB, free: 8.336 MB / 1.311 GB Notification: Performance of simCode: some other stuff during SimCode phase: time 0.007883/2.018, allocations: 5.377 MB / 1.572 GB, free: 2.914 MB / 1.311 GB Notification: Performance of simCode: all other stuff during SimCode phase: time 0.002897/2.021, allocations: 447.4 kB / 1.572 GB, free: 2.477 MB / 1.311 GB Notification: Performance of SimCode: time 1.052e-06/2.021, allocations: 0 / 1.572 GB, free: 2.477 MB / 1.311 GB Notification: Performance of Templates: time 1.13/3.151, allocations: 478.6 MB / 2.04 GB, free: 11.79 MB / 1.326 GB make -j1 -f Buildings_9_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.makefile (rm -f Buildings_9_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.pipe ; mkfifo Buildings_9_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.pipe ; head -c 1048576 < Buildings_9_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.pipe >> ../files/Buildings_9_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.sim & ./Buildings_9_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU -abortSlowSimulation -alarm=480 -emit_protected -lv LOG_STATS > Buildings_9_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.pipe 2>&1) diffSimulationResults("Buildings_9_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU_res.mat","/mnt/ReferenceFiles/Buildings/csv/maint_9.1.x/Buildings_Fluid_HeatExchangers_RadiantSlabs_Examples_StepResponseEpsilonNTU.csv","/var/lib/jenkins1/ws/OpenModelicaLibraryTestingWork/OpenModelicaLibraryTesting/files/Buildings_9_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.diff",relTol=0.003,relTolDiffMinMax=0.003,rangeDelta=0.001) Reference file matches