Running: ./testmodel.py --libraries=/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries --ompython_omhome=/usr Buildings_11_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference.conf.json loadFile("/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/ModelicaServices 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo", uses=false) [Timeout 90] Notification: Performance of loadFile(/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/ModelicaServices 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo): time 0.001573/0.001573, allocations: 107.4 kB / 18.19 MB, free: 4.117 MB / 14.72 MB [Timeout remaining time 90] loadFile("/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Complex 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo", uses=false) [Timeout 90] Notification: Performance of loadFile(/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Complex 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo): time 0.001795/0.001795, allocations: 193.9 kB / 21.34 MB, free: 0.9766 MB / 14.72 MB [Timeout remaining time 90] loadFile("/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Modelica 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo", uses=false) [Timeout 90] Notification: Performance of loadFile(/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Modelica 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo): time 1.535/1.535, allocations: 225.6 MB / 249.9 MB, free: 3.23 MB / 190.1 MB [Timeout remaining time 88] loadFile("/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Buildings 11.1.0-maint.11.x/package.mo", uses=false) [Timeout 90] Notification: Performance of loadFile(/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Buildings 11.1.0-maint.11.x/package.mo): time 2.851/2.851, allocations: 476.7 MB / 0.7634 GB, free: 15.29 MB / 0.6075 GB [Timeout remaining time 86] Using package Buildings with version 11.1.0 (/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Buildings 11.1.0-maint.11.x/package.mo) Using package Modelica with version 4.0.0 (/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Modelica 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo) Using package Complex with version 4.0.0 (/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Complex 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo) Using package ModelicaServices with version 4.0.0 (/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/ModelicaServices 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo) Running command: translateModel(Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference,tolerance=1e-06,outputFormat="mat",numberOfIntervals=503,variableFilter="time|sla.sta_b.T|sla.surf_a.T|sla.surf_b.T|sla.surf_a.Q_flow|sla.surf_b.Q_flow",fileNamePrefix="Buildings_11_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference") translateModel(Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference,tolerance=1e-06,outputFormat="mat",numberOfIntervals=503,variableFilter="time|sla.sta_b.T|sla.surf_a.T|sla.surf_b.T|sla.surf_a.Q_flow|sla.surf_b.Q_flow",fileNamePrefix="Buildings_11_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference") [Timeout 300] Notification: Performance of FrontEnd - loaded program: time 0.001962/0.001962, allocations: 59.91 kB / 1.108 GB, free: 4.82 MB / 0.8419 GB Notification: Performance of FrontEnd - Absyn->SCode: time 1.156/1.158, allocations: 168.7 MB / 1.272 GB, free: 7.988 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of NFInst.instantiate(Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference): time 0.03757/1.195, allocations: 32 MB / 1.304 GB, free: 1.137 MB / 1.014 GB Notification: Performance of NFInst.instExpressions: time 0.0229/1.218, allocations: 12.34 MB / 1.316 GB, free: 8.426 MB / 1.029 GB Notification: Performance of NFInst.updateImplicitVariability: time 0.003518/1.222, allocations: 60.31 kB / 1.316 GB, free: 8.406 MB / 1.029 GB Notification: Performance of NFTyping.typeComponents: time 0.004147/1.226, allocations: 1.126 MB / 1.317 GB, free: 7.82 MB / 1.029 GB Notification: Performance of NFTyping.typeBindings: time 0.008048/1.234, allocations: 2.149 MB / 1.319 GB, free: 6.574 MB / 1.029 GB Notification: Performance of NFTyping.typeClassSections: time 0.006933/1.241, allocations: 1.895 MB / 1.321 GB, free: 5.625 MB / 1.029 GB Notification: Performance of NFFlatten.flatten: time 0.02942/1.27, allocations: 19.62 MB / 1.34 GB, free: 13.4 MB / 1.045 GB Notification: Performance of NFFlatten.resolveConnections: time 0.01341/1.283, allocations: 6.313 MB / 1.346 GB, free: 11.06 MB / 1.045 GB Notification: Performance of NFEvalConstants.evaluate: time 0.01814/1.302, allocations: 6.559 MB / 1.353 GB, free: 8.242 MB / 1.045 GB Notification: Performance of NFSimplifyModel.simplify: time 0.01458/1.316, allocations: 5.65 MB / 1.358 GB, free: 4.797 MB / 1.045 GB Notification: Performance of NFPackage.collectConstants: time 0.004064/1.32, allocations: 0.7534 MB / 1.359 GB, free: 4.793 MB / 1.045 GB Notification: Performance of NFFlatten.collectFunctions: time 0.013/1.333, allocations: 3.233 MB / 1.362 GB, free: 3.328 MB / 1.045 GB Notification: Performance of NFScalarize.scalarize: time 0.007711/1.341, allocations: 3.089 MB / 1.365 GB, free: 1.191 MB / 1.045 GB Notification: Performance of NFVerifyModel.verify: time 0.01655/1.358, allocations: 4.753 MB / 1.37 GB, free: 13.97 MB / 1.061 GB Notification: Performance of NFConvertDAE.convert: time 0.03027/1.388, allocations: 15.48 MB / 1.385 GB, free: 2.023 MB / 1.061 GB Notification: Performance of FrontEnd - DAE generated: time 1.004e-05/1.388, allocations: 4 kB / 1.385 GB, free: 2.02 MB / 1.061 GB Notification: Performance of FrontEnd: time 2.375e-06/1.388, allocations: 0 / 1.385 GB, free: 2.02 MB / 1.061 GB Notification: Performance of Transformations before backend: time 0.0005378/1.388, allocations: 0 / 1.385 GB, free: 2.02 MB / 1.061 GB Notification: Model statistics after passing the front-end and creating the data structures used by the back-end: * Number of equations: 866 * Number of variables: 866 Notification: Performance of Generate backend data structure: time 0.03992/1.428, allocations: 11.75 MB / 1.396 GB, free: 6.148 MB / 1.076 GB Notification: Performance of prepare preOptimizeDAE: time 5.741e-05/1.428, allocations: 15.97 kB / 1.396 GB, free: 6.133 MB / 1.076 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt normalInlineFunction (simulation): time 0.005057/1.433, allocations: 0.9247 MB / 1.397 GB, free: 5.203 MB / 1.076 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt evaluateParameters (simulation): time 0.02467/1.458, allocations: 9.674 MB / 1.407 GB, free: 11.46 MB / 1.092 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt simplifyIfEquations (simulation): time 0.000371/1.458, allocations: 346.8 kB / 1.407 GB, free: 11.12 MB / 1.092 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt expandDerOperator (simulation): time 0.001845/1.46, allocations: 479.9 kB / 1.407 GB, free: 10.65 MB / 1.092 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt clockPartitioning (simulation): time 0.01211/1.472, allocations: 5.956 MB / 1.413 GB, free: 4.461 MB / 1.092 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt findStateOrder (simulation): time 7.776e-05/1.472, allocations: 11.88 kB / 1.413 GB, free: 4.449 MB / 1.092 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt replaceEdgeChange (simulation): time 0.000403/1.473, allocations: 148 kB / 1.413 GB, free: 4.305 MB / 1.092 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt inlineArrayEqn (simulation): time 0.0001047/1.473, allocations: 95.98 kB / 1.413 GB, free: 4.211 MB / 1.092 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt removeEqualRHS (simulation): time 0.009854/1.483, allocations: 4.766 MB / 1.418 GB, free: 15.43 MB / 1.108 GB Warning: The model contains alias variables with redundant start and/or conflicting nominal values. It is recommended to resolve the conflicts, because otherwise the system could be hard to solve. To print the conflicting alias sets and the chosen candidates please use -d=aliasConflicts. Notification: Performance of preOpt removeSimpleEquations (simulation): time 0.07665/1.559, allocations: 33.81 MB / 1.451 GB, free: 11.98 MB / 1.139 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt comSubExp (simulation): time 0.01388/1.573, allocations: 6.037 MB / 1.457 GB, free: 5.832 MB / 1.139 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt resolveLoops (simulation): time 0.005136/1.578, allocations: 2.425 MB / 1.459 GB, free: 3.41 MB / 1.139 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt evalFunc (simulation): time 0.03556/1.614, allocations: 13.25 MB / 1.472 GB, free: 5.613 MB / 1.154 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt encapsulateWhenConditions (simulation): time 0.005244/1.619, allocations: 2.137 MB / 1.474 GB, free: 3.457 MB / 1.154 GB Notification: Performance of pre-optimization done (n=224): time 7.675e-06/1.619, allocations: 0 / 1.474 GB, free: 3.457 MB / 1.154 GB Notification: Performance of matching and sorting (n=232): time 0.03397/1.653, allocations: 14.28 MB / 1.488 GB, free: 5.016 MB / 1.17 GB Notification: Performance of inlineWhenForInitialization (initialization): time 0.0001009/1.653, allocations: 128.8 kB / 1.488 GB, free: 4.863 MB / 1.17 GB Notification: Performance of selectInitializationVariablesDAE (initialization): time 0.02408/1.677, allocations: 10.44 MB / 1.499 GB, free: 10.43 MB / 1.186 GB Notification: Performance of collectPreVariables (initialization): time 0.001054/1.678, allocations: 113.7 kB / 1.499 GB, free: 10.32 MB / 1.186 GB Notification: Performance of collectInitialEqns (initialization): time 0.005486/1.684, allocations: 3.345 MB / 1.502 GB, free: 6.953 MB / 1.186 GB Notification: Performance of collectInitialBindings (initialization): time 0.002341/1.686, allocations: 0.9065 MB / 1.503 GB, free: 6.039 MB / 1.186 GB Notification: Performance of simplifyInitialFunctions (initialization): time 0.002753/1.689, allocations: 1.214 MB / 1.504 GB, free: 4.816 MB / 1.186 GB Notification: Performance of setup shared object (initialization): time 0.0001322/1.689, allocations: 309.1 kB / 1.504 GB, free: 4.512 MB / 1.186 GB Notification: Performance of preBalanceInitialSystem (initialization): time 0.005935/1.695, allocations: 3.455 MB / 1.508 GB, free: 1.039 MB / 1.186 GB Notification: Performance of partitionIndependentBlocks (initialization): time 0.008478/1.704, allocations: 5.928 MB / 1.514 GB, free: 9.906 MB / 1.201 GB Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3])) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3])) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3])) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3])) Notification: Performance of analyzeInitialSystem (initialization): time 0.06867/1.772, allocations: 36.65 MB / 1.549 GB, free: 3.809 MB / 1.233 GB Notification: Performance of solveInitialSystemEqSystem (initialization): time 0.0001066/1.772, allocations: 24 kB / 1.549 GB, free: 3.785 MB / 1.233 GB Notification: Performance of matching and sorting (n=659) (initialization): time 0.02457/1.797, allocations: 10.1 MB / 1.559 GB, free: 9.605 MB / 1.248 GB Notification: Performance of prepare postOptimizeDAE: time 0.0001907/1.797, allocations: 70.69 kB / 1.559 GB, free: 9.531 MB / 1.248 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyComplexFunction (initialization): time 0.0001896/1.797, allocations: 87.94 kB / 1.559 GB, free: 9.445 MB / 1.248 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt tearingSystem (initialization): time 0.002155/1.799, allocations: 0.7122 MB / 1.56 GB, free: 8.711 MB / 1.248 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt solveSimpleEquations (initialization): time 0.006428/1.806, allocations: 1.482 MB / 1.562 GB, free: 7.227 MB / 1.248 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt calculateStrongComponentJacobians (initialization): time 0.01506/1.821, allocations: 14.53 MB / 1.576 GB, free: 7.723 MB / 1.264 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyAllExpressions (initialization): time 0.01148/1.832, allocations: 1.174 MB / 1.577 GB, free: 6.547 MB / 1.264 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt collapseArrayExpressions (initialization): time 0.001756/1.834, allocations: 280 kB / 1.577 GB, free: 6.273 MB / 1.264 GB Warning: The initial conditions are over specified. The following 8 initial equations are redundant, so they are removed from the initialization system: sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3]) sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3]) sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3]) sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]). Notification: Performance of preBalanceInitialSystem (initialization_lambda0): time 0.01558/1.85, allocations: 7.095 MB / 1.584 GB, free: 15.17 MB / 1.279 GB Notification: Performance of partitionIndependentBlocks (initialization_lambda0): time 0.01016/1.86, allocations: 5.928 MB / 1.59 GB, free: 8.035 MB / 1.279 GB Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3])) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3])) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3])) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3])) Notification: Performance of analyzeInitialSystem (initialization_lambda0): time 0.07192/1.932, allocations: 36.56 MB / 1.626 GB, free: 2.02 MB / 1.311 GB Notification: Performance of solveInitialSystemEqSystem (initialization_lambda0): time 0.0001077/1.932, allocations: 24 kB / 1.626 GB, free: 1.996 MB / 1.311 GB Notification: Performance of matching and sorting (n=659) (initialization_lambda0): time 0.02476/1.957, allocations: 10.11 MB / 1.635 GB, free: 7.805 MB / 1.326 GB Notification: Performance of prepare postOptimizeDAE: time 0.000151/1.957, allocations: 69.77 kB / 1.636 GB, free: 7.73 MB / 1.326 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyComplexFunction (initialization): time 0.0001658/1.957, allocations: 84 kB / 1.636 GB, free: 7.648 MB / 1.326 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt tearingSystem (initialization): time 0.002025/1.959, allocations: 0.7122 MB / 1.636 GB, free: 6.914 MB / 1.326 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt solveSimpleEquations (initialization): time 0.006312/1.965, allocations: 1.478 MB / 1.638 GB, free: 5.434 MB / 1.326 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt calculateStrongComponentJacobians (initialization): time 0.01467/1.98, allocations: 14.53 MB / 1.652 GB, free: 5.922 MB / 1.342 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyAllExpressions (initialization): time 0.01084/1.991, allocations: 1.185 MB / 1.653 GB, free: 4.734 MB / 1.342 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt collapseArrayExpressions (initialization): time 0.00177/1.993, allocations: 280 kB / 1.653 GB, free: 4.461 MB / 1.342 GB Warning: The initial conditions are over specified. The following 8 initial equations are redundant, so they are removed from the initialization_lambda0 system: sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3]) sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3]) sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3]) sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]). Notification: Model statistics after passing the back-end for initialization: * Number of independent subsystems: 384 * Number of states: 0 () * Number of discrete variables: 5 ($PRE.pulse.count,$PRE.pulse.T_start,pulse.count,pulse.T_start,$whenCondition1) * Number of discrete states: 0 () * Number of clocked states: 0 () * Top-level inputs: 0 Notification: Strong component statistics for initialization (635): * Single equations (assignments): 627 * Array equations: 0 * Algorithm blocks: 1 * Record equations: 0 * When equations: 0 * If-equations: 0 * Equation systems (not torn): 0 * Torn equation systems: 7 * Mixed (continuous/discrete) equation systems: 0 Notification: Torn system details for strict tearing set: * Linear torn systems (#iteration vars, #inner vars, density): 7 systems {(1,9,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,9,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%)} * Non-linear torn systems (#iteration vars, #inner vars): 0 systems Notification: Performance of prepare postOptimizeDAE: time 0.003091/1.996, allocations: 0.7494 MB / 1.654 GB, free: 3.695 MB / 1.342 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt lateInlineFunction (simulation): time 0.003704/1.999, allocations: 0.6985 MB / 1.655 GB, free: 2.992 MB / 1.342 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt wrapFunctionCalls (simulation): time 0.01303/2.013, allocations: 5.136 MB / 1.66 GB, free: 13.82 MB / 1.358 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt inlineArrayEqn (simulation): time 4.113e-05/2.013, allocations: 24 kB / 1.66 GB, free: 13.8 MB / 1.358 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt constantLinearSystem (simulation): time 2.536e-05/2.013, allocations: 4 kB / 1.66 GB, free: 13.8 MB / 1.358 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifysemiLinear (simulation): time 0.007269/2.02, allocations: 3.95 MB / 1.664 GB, free: 9.812 MB / 1.358 GB Warning: The model contains alias variables with redundant start and/or conflicting nominal values. It is recommended to resolve the conflicts, because otherwise the system could be hard to solve. To print the conflicting alias sets and the chosen candidates please use -d=aliasConflicts. Notification: Performance of postOpt removeSimpleEquations (simulation): time 0.03709/2.057, allocations: 13.4 MB / 1.677 GB, free: 12.18 MB / 1.373 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyComplexFunction (simulation): time 1.721e-05/2.057, allocations: 4 kB / 1.677 GB, free: 12.18 MB / 1.373 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt solveSimpleEquations (simulation): time 0.002862/2.06, allocations: 0.5971 MB / 1.677 GB, free: 11.58 MB / 1.373 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt tearingSystem (simulation): time 0.001821/2.062, allocations: 0.5872 MB / 1.678 GB, free: 10.97 MB / 1.373 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt inputDerivativesUsed (simulation): time 0.0006237/2.062, allocations: 135.8 kB / 1.678 GB, free: 10.84 MB / 1.373 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt calculateStrongComponentJacobians (simulation): time 0.01418/2.076, allocations: 14.39 MB / 1.692 GB, free: 11.46 MB / 1.389 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt calculateStateSetsJacobians (simulation): time 6.533e-06/2.076, allocations: 4 kB / 1.692 GB, free: 11.46 MB / 1.389 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt symbolicJacobian (simulation): time 0.01566/2.092, allocations: 7.153 MB / 1.699 GB, free: 4.223 MB / 1.389 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt removeConstants (simulation): time 0.006791/2.099, allocations: 1.699 MB / 1.701 GB, free: 2.5 MB / 1.389 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyTimeIndepFuncCalls (simulation): time 0.003446/2.102, allocations: 127.8 kB / 1.701 GB, free: 2.375 MB / 1.389 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyAllExpressions (simulation): time 0.006999/2.109, allocations: 0.6126 MB / 1.701 GB, free: 1.762 MB / 1.389 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt findZeroCrossings (simulation): time 0.0009198/2.11, allocations: 169.7 kB / 1.702 GB, free: 1.594 MB / 1.389 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt collapseArrayExpressions (simulation): time 0.0005581/2.111, allocations: 83.95 kB / 1.702 GB, free: 1.512 MB / 1.389 GB Notification: Performance of sorting global known variables: time 0.01939/2.13, allocations: 7.335 MB / 1.709 GB, free: 10.18 MB / 1.404 GB Notification: Performance of sort global known variables: time 3.11e-07/2.13, allocations: 0 / 1.709 GB, free: 10.18 MB / 1.404 GB Notification: Performance of remove unused functions: time 0.02273/2.153, allocations: 3.972 MB / 1.713 GB, free: 6.211 MB / 1.404 GB Notification: Model statistics after passing the back-end for simulation: * Number of independent subsystems: 12 * Number of states: 43 (sla.vol[1].dynBal.U,sla.vol[2].dynBal.U,sla.vol[3].dynBal.U,sla.vol[4].dynBal.U,sla.vol[5].dynBal.U,sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_b[1].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[2].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[3].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[4].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[5].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T[3],TOut.T) * Number of discrete variables: 3 ($whenCondition1,pulse.T_start,pulse.count) * Number of discrete states: 1 (pulse.count) * Number of clocked states: 0 () * Top-level inputs: 0 Notification: Strong component statistics for simulation (210): * Single equations (assignments): 199 * Array equations: 0 * Algorithm blocks: 0 * Record equations: 2 * When equations: 2 * If-equations: 0 * Equation systems (not torn): 0 * Torn equation systems: 7 * Mixed (continuous/discrete) equation systems: 0 Notification: Torn system details for strict tearing set: * Linear torn systems (#iteration vars, #inner vars, density): 7 systems {(1,9,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,9,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%)} * Non-linear torn systems (#iteration vars, #inner vars): 0 systems Notification: Performance of Backend phase and start with SimCode phase: time 0.00291/2.156, allocations: 0.5901 MB / 1.713 GB, free: 5.625 MB / 1.404 GB Notification: Performance of simCode: created initialization part: time 0.02581/2.182, allocations: 13.1 MB / 1.726 GB, free: 8.34 MB / 1.42 GB Notification: Performance of simCode: created event and clocks part: time 1.399e-05/2.182, allocations: 4 kB / 1.726 GB, free: 8.336 MB / 1.42 GB Notification: Performance of simCode: created simulation system equations: time 0.005936/2.188, allocations: 2.954 MB / 1.729 GB, free: 5.289 MB / 1.42 GB Notification: Performance of simCode: created of all other equations (e.g. parameter, nominal, assert, etc): time 0.02024/2.208, allocations: 2.943 MB / 1.732 GB, free: 2.391 MB / 1.42 GB Notification: Performance of simCode: created linear, non-linear and system jacobian parts: time 0.04816/2.256, allocations: 19.4 MB / 1.751 GB, free: 14.91 MB / 1.451 GB Notification: Performance of simCode: some other stuff during SimCode phase: time 0.01061/2.267, allocations: 5.369 MB / 1.756 GB, free: 9.5 MB / 1.451 GB Notification: Performance of simCode: all other stuff during SimCode phase: time 0.00322/2.27, allocations: 455.3 kB / 1.756 GB, free: 9.055 MB / 1.451 GB Notification: Performance of SimCode: time 1.643e-06/2.27, allocations: 0 / 1.756 GB, free: 9.055 MB / 1.451 GB Notification: Performance of Templates: time 1.331/3.601, allocations: 479.1 MB / 2.224 GB, free: 152.6 MB / 1.529 GB [Timeout remaining time 296] make -j1 -f Buildings_11_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference.makefile [Timeout 300] (rm -f Buildings_11_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference.pipe ; mkfifo Buildings_11_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference.pipe ; head -c 1048576 < Buildings_11_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference.pipe >> ../files/Buildings_11_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference.sim & ./Buildings_11_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference -abortSlowSimulation -alarm=400 -emit_protected -lv LOG_STATS > Buildings_11_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference.pipe 2>&1) [Timeout 400] diffSimulationResults("Buildings_11_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference_res.mat","/mnt/ReferenceFiles/Buildings/csv/maint_11.x/Buildings_Fluid_HeatExchangers_RadiantSlabs_Examples_StepResponseFiniteDifference.csv","/var/lib/jenkins1/ws/OpenModelicaLibraryTestingWork/OpenModelicaLibraryTesting/files/Buildings_11_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference.diff",relTol=0.003,relTolDiffMinMax=0.003,rangeDelta=0.001) [Timeout 300] [Timeout remaining time 300] Reference file matches