Running: ./testmodel.py --libraries=/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries --ompython_omhome=/usr Buildings_11_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.conf.json
loadFile("/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/ModelicaServices 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo", uses=false) [Timeout 90]
Notification: Performance of loadFile(/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/ModelicaServices 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo): time 0.001602/0.001602, allocations: 104.1 kB / 18.19 MB, free: 4.117 MB / 14.72 MB
[Timeout remaining time 90]
loadFile("/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Complex 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo", uses=false) [Timeout 90]
Notification: Performance of loadFile(/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Complex 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo): time 0.00165/0.00165, allocations: 192.4 kB / 21.34 MB, free: 0.9766 MB / 14.72 MB
[Timeout remaining time 90]
loadFile("/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Modelica 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo", uses=false) [Timeout 90]
Notification: Performance of loadFile(/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Modelica 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo): time 1.457/1.457, allocations: 225.6 MB / 249.9 MB, free: 3.234 MB / 190.1 MB
[Timeout remaining time 88]
loadFile("/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Buildings 11.1.0-maint.11.x/package.mo", uses=false) [Timeout 90]
Notification: Performance of loadFile(/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Buildings 11.1.0-maint.11.x/package.mo): time 2.801/2.801, allocations: 476.7 MB / 0.7634 GB, free: 15.22 MB / 0.6075 GB
[Timeout remaining time 86]
Using package Buildings with version 11.1.0 (/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Buildings 11.1.0-maint.11.x/package.mo)
Using package Modelica with version 4.0.0 (/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Modelica 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo)
Using package Complex with version 4.0.0 (/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Complex 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo)
Using package ModelicaServices with version 4.0.0 (/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/ModelicaServices 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo)
Running command: translateModel(Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU,tolerance=1e-06,outputFormat="mat",numberOfIntervals=503,variableFilter="time|sla.sta_b.T|sla.surf_a.T|sla.surf_b.T|sla.surf_a.Q_flow|sla.surf_b.Q_flow",fileNamePrefix="Buildings_11_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU")
translateModel(Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU,tolerance=1e-06,outputFormat="mat",numberOfIntervals=503,variableFilter="time|sla.sta_b.T|sla.surf_a.T|sla.surf_b.T|sla.surf_a.Q_flow|sla.surf_b.Q_flow",fileNamePrefix="Buildings_11_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU") [Timeout 300]
Notification: Performance of FrontEnd - loaded program: time 0.002915/0.002915, allocations: 64.14 kB / 1.108 GB, free: 4.812 MB / 0.8419 GB
Notification: Performance of FrontEnd - Absyn->SCode: time 1.099/1.101, allocations: 168.7 MB / 1.272 GB, free: 7.973 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of NFInst.instantiate(Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU): time 0.03605/1.138, allocations: 32 MB / 1.304 GB, free: 1.129 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of NFInst.instExpressions: time 0.02231/1.16, allocations: 12.32 MB / 1.316 GB, free: 8.426 MB / 1.029 GB
Notification: Performance of NFInst.updateImplicitVariability: time 0.004571/1.164, allocations: 58.97 kB / 1.316 GB, free: 8.406 MB / 1.029 GB
Notification: Performance of NFTyping.typeComponents: time 0.004594/1.169, allocations: 1.123 MB / 1.317 GB, free: 7.824 MB / 1.029 GB
Notification: Performance of NFTyping.typeBindings: time 0.008199/1.177, allocations: 2.162 MB / 1.319 GB, free: 6.57 MB / 1.029 GB
Notification: Performance of NFTyping.typeClassSections: time 0.006941/1.184, allocations: 1.888 MB / 1.321 GB, free: 5.625 MB / 1.029 GB
Notification: Performance of NFFlatten.flatten: time 0.0271/1.211, allocations: 19.63 MB / 1.34 GB, free: 13.4 MB / 1.045 GB
Notification: Performance of NFFlatten.resolveConnections: time 0.01275/1.224, allocations: 6.31 MB / 1.346 GB, free: 11.06 MB / 1.045 GB
Notification: Performance of NFEvalConstants.evaluate: time 0.01802/1.242, allocations: 6.564 MB / 1.353 GB, free: 8.254 MB / 1.045 GB
Notification: Performance of NFSimplifyModel.simplify: time 0.014/1.256, allocations: 5.645 MB / 1.358 GB, free: 4.812 MB / 1.045 GB
Notification: Performance of NFPackage.collectConstants: time 0.004023/1.26, allocations: 0.7491 MB / 1.359 GB, free: 4.812 MB / 1.045 GB
Notification: Performance of NFFlatten.collectFunctions: time 0.01339/1.273, allocations: 3.237 MB / 1.362 GB, free: 3.344 MB / 1.045 GB
Notification: Performance of NFScalarize.scalarize: time 0.007941/1.281, allocations: 3.084 MB / 1.365 GB, free: 1.211 MB / 1.045 GB
Notification: Performance of NFVerifyModel.verify: time 0.01712/1.298, allocations: 4.75 MB / 1.37 GB, free: 13.99 MB / 1.061 GB
Notification: Performance of NFConvertDAE.convert: time 0.03317/1.332, allocations: 15.49 MB / 1.385 GB, free: 2.023 MB / 1.061 GB
Notification: Performance of FrontEnd - DAE generated: time 8.637e-06/1.332, allocations: 0 / 1.385 GB, free: 2.023 MB / 1.061 GB
Notification: Performance of FrontEnd: time 3.546e-06/1.332, allocations: 0 / 1.385 GB, free: 2.023 MB / 1.061 GB
Notification: Performance of Transformations before backend: time 0.0005698/1.332, allocations: 0 / 1.385 GB, free: 2.023 MB / 1.061 GB
Notification: Model statistics after passing the front-end and creating the data structures used by the back-end:
 * Number of equations: 866
 * Number of variables: 866
Notification: Performance of Generate backend data structure: time 0.0442/1.376, allocations: 11.75 MB / 1.396 GB, free: 6.152 MB / 1.076 GB
Notification: Performance of prepare preOptimizeDAE: time 5.464e-05/1.376, allocations: 12.03 kB / 1.396 GB, free: 6.141 MB / 1.076 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt normalInlineFunction (simulation): time 0.005854/1.382, allocations: 0.9209 MB / 1.397 GB, free: 5.215 MB / 1.076 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt evaluateParameters (simulation): time 0.02634/1.409, allocations: 9.685 MB / 1.407 GB, free: 11.46 MB / 1.092 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt simplifyIfEquations (simulation): time 0.000399/1.409, allocations: 334.8 kB / 1.407 GB, free: 11.13 MB / 1.092 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt expandDerOperator (simulation): time 0.002128/1.411, allocations: 479.9 kB / 1.407 GB, free: 10.66 MB / 1.092 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt clockPartitioning (simulation): time 0.01214/1.423, allocations: 5.956 MB / 1.413 GB, free: 4.473 MB / 1.092 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt findStateOrder (simulation): time 7.976e-05/1.423, allocations: 11.88 kB / 1.413 GB, free: 4.461 MB / 1.092 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt replaceEdgeChange (simulation): time 0.0004418/1.424, allocations: 148 kB / 1.413 GB, free: 4.316 MB / 1.092 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt inlineArrayEqn (simulation): time 0.0001205/1.424, allocations: 104 kB / 1.413 GB, free: 4.215 MB / 1.092 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt removeEqualRHS (simulation): time 0.008985/1.433, allocations: 4.762 MB / 1.418 GB, free: 15.44 MB / 1.107 GB
Warning: The model contains alias variables with redundant start and/or conflicting nominal values. It is recommended to resolve the conflicts, because otherwise the system could be hard to solve. To print the conflicting alias sets and the chosen candidates please use -d=aliasConflicts.
Notification: Performance of preOpt removeSimpleEquations (simulation): time 0.06852/1.502, allocations: 33.8 MB / 1.451 GB, free: 12 MB / 1.139 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt comSubExp (simulation): time 0.01285/1.514, allocations: 6.049 MB / 1.457 GB, free: 5.836 MB / 1.139 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt resolveLoops (simulation): time 0.004324/1.519, allocations: 2.427 MB / 1.459 GB, free: 3.41 MB / 1.139 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt evalFunc (simulation): time 0.02859/1.547, allocations: 13.24 MB / 1.472 GB, free: 5.621 MB / 1.154 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt encapsulateWhenConditions (simulation): time 0.003825/1.551, allocations: 2.137 MB / 1.474 GB, free: 3.465 MB / 1.154 GB
Notification: Performance of pre-optimization done (n=224): time 5.29e-06/1.551, allocations: 0 / 1.474 GB, free: 3.465 MB / 1.154 GB
Notification: Performance of matching and sorting (n=232): time 0.0353/1.586, allocations: 14.28 MB / 1.488 GB, free: 5.027 MB / 1.17 GB
Notification: Performance of inlineWhenForInitialization (initialization): time 0.0001024/1.587, allocations: 132.8 kB / 1.488 GB, free: 4.871 MB / 1.17 GB
Notification: Performance of selectInitializationVariablesDAE (initialization): time 0.0243/1.611, allocations: 10.43 MB / 1.499 GB, free: 10.44 MB / 1.186 GB
Notification: Performance of collectPreVariables (initialization): time 0.001146/1.612, allocations: 117.7 kB / 1.499 GB, free: 10.32 MB / 1.186 GB
Notification: Performance of collectInitialEqns (initialization): time 0.006055/1.618, allocations: 3.349 MB / 1.502 GB, free: 6.957 MB / 1.186 GB
Notification: Performance of collectInitialBindings (initialization): time 0.002522/1.621, allocations: 0.9104 MB / 1.503 GB, free: 6.039 MB / 1.186 GB
Notification: Performance of simplifyInitialFunctions (initialization): time 0.002871/1.623, allocations: 1.21 MB / 1.504 GB, free: 4.82 MB / 1.186 GB
Notification: Performance of setup shared object (initialization): time 0.0001439/1.624, allocations: 305.1 kB / 1.504 GB, free: 4.52 MB / 1.186 GB
Notification: Performance of preBalanceInitialSystem (initialization): time 0.005947/1.629, allocations: 3.455 MB / 1.508 GB, free: 1.047 MB / 1.186 GB
Notification: Performance of partitionIndependentBlocks (initialization): time 0.009044/1.639, allocations: 5.932 MB / 1.514 GB, free: 9.91 MB / 1.201 GB
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3]))
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3]))
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3]))
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]))
Notification: Performance of analyzeInitialSystem (initialization): time 0.07328/1.712, allocations: 36.64 MB / 1.549 GB, free: 3.82 MB / 1.232 GB
Notification: Performance of solveInitialSystemEqSystem (initialization): time 9.188e-05/1.712, allocations: 28 kB / 1.549 GB, free: 3.793 MB / 1.232 GB
Notification: Performance of matching and sorting (n=659) (initialization): time 0.02403/1.736, allocations: 10.1 MB / 1.559 GB, free: 9.613 MB / 1.248 GB
Notification: Performance of prepare postOptimizeDAE: time 0.0001812/1.736, allocations: 69.7 kB / 1.559 GB, free: 9.539 MB / 1.248 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyComplexFunction (initialization): time 0.0001826/1.736, allocations: 84 kB / 1.559 GB, free: 9.457 MB / 1.248 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt tearingSystem (initialization): time 0.002138/1.738, allocations: 0.7166 MB / 1.56 GB, free: 8.719 MB / 1.248 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt solveSimpleEquations (initialization): time 0.006344/1.745, allocations: 1.482 MB / 1.561 GB, free: 7.234 MB / 1.248 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt calculateStrongComponentJacobians (initialization): time 0.01517/1.76, allocations: 14.53 MB / 1.576 GB, free: 7.727 MB / 1.264 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyAllExpressions (initialization): time 0.0112/1.771, allocations: 1.178 MB / 1.577 GB, free: 6.547 MB / 1.264 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt collapseArrayExpressions (initialization): time 0.001745/1.773, allocations: 276 kB / 1.577 GB, free: 6.277 MB / 1.264 GB
Warning: The initial conditions are over specified. The following 8 initial equations are redundant, so they are removed from the initialization system:
         sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start
         sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start
         sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start
         sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start
         sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3])
         sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3])
         sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3])
         sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]).
Notification: Performance of preBalanceInitialSystem (initialization_lambda0): time 0.01543/1.788, allocations: 7.088 MB / 1.584 GB, free: 15.18 MB / 1.279 GB
Notification: Performance of partitionIndependentBlocks (initialization_lambda0): time 0.00985/1.798, allocations: 5.932 MB / 1.59 GB, free: 8.043 MB / 1.279 GB
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3]))
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3]))
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3]))
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]))
Notification: Performance of analyzeInitialSystem (initialization_lambda0): time 0.07237/1.871, allocations: 36.57 MB / 1.626 GB, free: 2.02 MB / 1.311 GB
Notification: Performance of solveInitialSystemEqSystem (initialization_lambda0): time 8.833e-05/1.871, allocations: 24 kB / 1.626 GB, free: 1.996 MB / 1.311 GB
Notification: Performance of matching and sorting (n=659) (initialization_lambda0): time 0.02392/1.895, allocations: 10.09 MB / 1.635 GB, free: 7.816 MB / 1.326 GB
Notification: Performance of prepare postOptimizeDAE: time 0.0001488/1.895, allocations: 73.69 kB / 1.635 GB, free: 7.738 MB / 1.326 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyComplexFunction (initialization): time 0.0001703/1.895, allocations: 84.88 kB / 1.636 GB, free: 7.656 MB / 1.326 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt tearingSystem (initialization): time 0.001998/1.897, allocations: 0.7122 MB / 1.636 GB, free: 6.922 MB / 1.326 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt solveSimpleEquations (initialization): time 0.00616/1.903, allocations: 1.474 MB / 1.638 GB, free: 5.445 MB / 1.326 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt calculateStrongComponentJacobians (initialization): time 0.01471/1.918, allocations: 14.53 MB / 1.652 GB, free: 5.934 MB / 1.342 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyAllExpressions (initialization): time 0.01099/1.929, allocations: 1.189 MB / 1.653 GB, free: 4.742 MB / 1.342 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt collapseArrayExpressions (initialization): time 0.001618/1.93, allocations: 272 kB / 1.653 GB, free: 4.477 MB / 1.342 GB
Warning: The initial conditions are over specified. The following 8 initial equations are redundant, so they are removed from the initialization_lambda0 system:
         sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start
         sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start
         sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start
         sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start
         sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3])
         sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3])
         sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3])
         sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]).
Notification: Model statistics after passing the back-end for initialization:
 * Number of independent subsystems: 384
 * Number of states: 0 ()
 * Number of discrete variables: 5 ($PRE.pulse.count,$PRE.pulse.T_start,pulse.count,pulse.T_start,$whenCondition1)
 * Number of discrete states: 0 ()
 * Number of clocked states: 0 ()
 * Top-level inputs: 0
Notification: Strong component statistics for initialization (635):
 * Single equations (assignments): 627
 * Array equations: 0
 * Algorithm blocks: 1
 * Record equations: 0
 * When equations: 0
 * If-equations: 0
 * Equation systems (not torn): 0
 * Torn equation systems: 7
 * Mixed (continuous/discrete) equation systems: 0
Notification: Torn system details for strict tearing set:
 * Linear torn systems (#iteration vars, #inner vars, density): 7 systems
   {(1,9,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,9,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%)}
 * Non-linear torn systems (#iteration vars, #inner vars): 0 systems
Notification: Performance of prepare postOptimizeDAE: time 0.002897/1.933, allocations: 0.7533 MB / 1.654 GB, free: 3.711 MB / 1.342 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt lateInlineFunction (simulation): time 0.003368/1.937, allocations: 0.7023 MB / 1.655 GB, free: 3.004 MB / 1.342 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt wrapFunctionCalls (simulation): time 0.01262/1.949, allocations: 5.131 MB / 1.66 GB, free: 13.84 MB / 1.357 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt inlineArrayEqn (simulation): time 3.834e-05/1.949, allocations: 24 kB / 1.66 GB, free: 13.81 MB / 1.357 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt constantLinearSystem (simulation): time 2.634e-05/1.949, allocations: 4 kB / 1.66 GB, free: 13.81 MB / 1.357 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifysemiLinear (simulation): time 0.007347/1.957, allocations: 3.95 MB / 1.664 GB, free: 9.824 MB / 1.357 GB
Warning: The model contains alias variables with redundant start and/or conflicting nominal values. It is recommended to resolve the conflicts, because otherwise the system could be hard to solve. To print the conflicting alias sets and the chosen candidates please use -d=aliasConflicts.
Notification: Performance of postOpt removeSimpleEquations (simulation): time 0.04408/2.001, allocations: 13.41 MB / 1.677 GB, free: 12.19 MB / 1.373 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyComplexFunction (simulation): time 1.569e-05/2.001, allocations: 4 kB / 1.677 GB, free: 12.18 MB / 1.373 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt solveSimpleEquations (simulation): time 0.002973/2.004, allocations: 0.5968 MB / 1.677 GB, free: 11.59 MB / 1.373 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt tearingSystem (simulation): time 0.001824/2.006, allocations: 0.5873 MB / 1.678 GB, free: 10.98 MB / 1.373 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt inputDerivativesUsed (simulation): time 0.0006513/2.006, allocations: 135.8 kB / 1.678 GB, free: 10.84 MB / 1.373 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt calculateStrongComponentJacobians (simulation): time 0.01452/2.021, allocations: 14.39 MB / 1.692 GB, free: 11.47 MB / 1.389 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt calculateStateSetsJacobians (simulation): time 6.402e-06/2.021, allocations: 8.062 kB / 1.692 GB, free: 11.46 MB / 1.389 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt symbolicJacobian (simulation): time 0.0157/2.036, allocations: 7.151 MB / 1.699 GB, free: 4.23 MB / 1.389 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt removeConstants (simulation): time 0.007156/2.044, allocations: 1.699 MB / 1.701 GB, free: 2.508 MB / 1.389 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyTimeIndepFuncCalls (simulation): time 0.003654/2.047, allocations: 128.3 kB / 1.701 GB, free: 2.383 MB / 1.389 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyAllExpressions (simulation): time 0.007729/2.055, allocations: 0.6121 MB / 1.701 GB, free: 1.77 MB / 1.389 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt findZeroCrossings (simulation): time 0.001467/2.056, allocations: 169.7 kB / 1.702 GB, free: 1.602 MB / 1.389 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt collapseArrayExpressions (simulation): time 0.001048/2.057, allocations: 83.95 kB / 1.702 GB, free: 1.52 MB / 1.389 GB
Notification: Performance of sorting global known variables: time 0.0244/2.082, allocations: 7.331 MB / 1.709 GB, free: 10.2 MB / 1.404 GB
Notification: Performance of sort global known variables: time 5.11e-07/2.082, allocations: 0 / 1.709 GB, free: 10.2 MB / 1.404 GB
Notification: Performance of remove unused functions: time 0.02318/2.105, allocations: 3.968 MB / 1.713 GB, free: 6.23 MB / 1.404 GB
Notification: Model statistics after passing the back-end for simulation:
 * Number of independent subsystems: 12
 * Number of states: 43 (sla.vol[1].dynBal.U,sla.vol[2].dynBal.U,sla.vol[3].dynBal.U,sla.vol[4].dynBal.U,sla.vol[5].dynBal.U,sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_b[1].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[2].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[3].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[4].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[5].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T[3],TOut.T)
 * Number of discrete variables: 3 ($whenCondition1,pulse.T_start,pulse.count)
 * Number of discrete states: 1 (pulse.count)
 * Number of clocked states: 0 ()
 * Top-level inputs: 0
Notification: Strong component statistics for simulation (210):
 * Single equations (assignments): 199
 * Array equations: 0
 * Algorithm blocks: 0
 * Record equations: 2
 * When equations: 2
 * If-equations: 0
 * Equation systems (not torn): 0
 * Torn equation systems: 7
 * Mixed (continuous/discrete) equation systems: 0
Notification: Torn system details for strict tearing set:
 * Linear torn systems (#iteration vars, #inner vars, density): 7 systems
   {(1,9,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,9,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%)}
 * Non-linear torn systems (#iteration vars, #inner vars): 0 systems
Notification: Performance of Backend phase and start with SimCode phase: time 0.003022/2.108, allocations: 0.5994 MB / 1.713 GB, free: 5.633 MB / 1.404 GB
Notification: Performance of simCode: created initialization part: time 0.02798/2.136, allocations: 13.11 MB / 1.726 GB, free: 8.344 MB / 1.42 GB
Notification: Performance of simCode: created event and clocks part: time 1.664e-05/2.136, allocations: 4 kB / 1.726 GB, free: 8.34 MB / 1.42 GB
Notification: Performance of simCode: created simulation system equations: time 0.006442/2.143, allocations: 2.954 MB / 1.729 GB, free: 5.293 MB / 1.42 GB
Notification: Performance of simCode: created of all other equations (e.g. parameter, nominal, assert, etc): time 0.02133/2.164, allocations: 2.939 MB / 1.732 GB, free: 2.402 MB / 1.42 GB
Notification: Performance of simCode: created linear, non-linear and system jacobian parts: time 0.04873/2.213, allocations: 19.38 MB / 1.751 GB, free: 14.93 MB / 1.451 GB
Notification: Performance of simCode: some other stuff during SimCode phase: time 0.01116/2.224, allocations: 5.369 MB / 1.756 GB, free: 9.523 MB / 1.451 GB
Notification: Performance of simCode: all other stuff during SimCode phase: time 0.003323/2.227, allocations: 463.2 kB / 1.756 GB, free: 9.07 MB / 1.451 GB
Notification: Performance of SimCode: time 1.914e-06/2.227, allocations: 0 / 1.756 GB, free: 9.07 MB / 1.451 GB
Notification: Performance of Templates: time 1.344/3.571, allocations: 479.2 MB / 2.224 GB, free: 152.6 MB / 1.529 GB
[Timeout remaining time 296]
make -j1 -f Buildings_11_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.makefile [Timeout 300]
(rm -f Buildings_11_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.pipe ; mkfifo Buildings_11_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.pipe ; head -c 1048576 < Buildings_11_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.pipe >> ../files/Buildings_11_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.sim & ./Buildings_11_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU  -abortSlowSimulation -alarm=400  -emit_protected -lv LOG_STATS > Buildings_11_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.pipe 2>&1) [Timeout 400]
diffSimulationResults("Buildings_11_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU_res.mat","/mnt/ReferenceFiles/Buildings/csv/maint_11.x/Buildings_Fluid_HeatExchangers_RadiantSlabs_Examples_StepResponseEpsilonNTU.csv","/var/lib/jenkins1/ws/OpenModelicaLibraryTestingWork/OpenModelicaLibraryTesting/files/Buildings_11_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.diff",relTol=0.003,relTolDiffMinMax=0.003,rangeDelta=0.001) [Timeout 300]
[Timeout remaining time 300]
Reference file matches