Running: ./testmodel.py --libraries=/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries --ompython_omhome=/usr Buildings_13_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.conf.json loadFile("/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/ModelicaServices 4.1.0+maint.om/package.mo", uses=false) [Timeout 180] "Notification: Performance of loadFile(/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/ModelicaServices 4.1.0+maint.om/package.mo): time 0.0008492/0.0008492, allocations: 84.86 kB / 21.62 MB, free: 2.836 MB / 18.57 MB " [Timeout remaining time 180] loadFile("/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Complex 4.1.0+maint.om/package.mo", uses=false) [Timeout 180] "Notification: Performance of loadFile(/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Complex 4.1.0+maint.om/package.mo): time 0.0008709/0.0008709, allocations: 164.5 kB / 25.05 MB, free: 9.148 MB / 18.57 MB " [Timeout remaining time 180] loadFile("/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Modelica 4.1.0+maint.om/package.mo", uses=false) [Timeout 180] "Notification: Performance of loadFile(/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Modelica 4.1.0+maint.om/package.mo): time 0.8843/0.8843, allocations: 177.1 MB / 205.5 MB, free: 5.473 MB / 186.7 MB " [Timeout remaining time 179] loadFile("/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Buildings 13.0.2-maint.13.x/package.mo", uses=false) [Timeout 180] "Notification: Performance of loadFile(/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Buildings 13.0.2-maint.13.x/package.mo): time 1.83/1.83, allocations: 389.6 MB / 0.6363 GB, free: 12.28 MB / 0.6042 GB " [Timeout remaining time 178] Using package Buildings with version 13.0.2 (/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Buildings 13.0.2-maint.13.x/package.mo) Using package Modelica with version 4.1.0 (/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Modelica 4.1.0+maint.om/package.mo) Using package Complex with version 4.1.0 (/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Complex 4.1.0+maint.om/package.mo) Using package ModelicaServices with version 4.1.0 (/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/ModelicaServices 4.1.0+maint.om/package.mo) Running command: translateModel(Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU,tolerance=1e-06,outputFormat="empty",numberOfIntervals=2500,variableFilter="",fileNamePrefix="Buildings_13_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU") translateModel(Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU,tolerance=1e-06,outputFormat="empty",numberOfIntervals=2500,variableFilter="",fileNamePrefix="Buildings_13_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU") [Timeout 300] "Notification: Performance of FrontEnd - loaded program: time 1.783e-06/1.783e-06, allocations: 0 / 0.7761 GB, free: 5.23 MB / 0.7292 GB Notification: Performance of FrontEnd - Absyn->SCode: time 1.869e-05/2.048e-05, allocations: 5.406 kB / 0.7762 GB, free: 5.227 MB / 0.7292 GB Notification: Performance of NFInst.instantiate(Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU): time 0.01038/0.0104, allocations: 13.45 MB / 0.7893 GB, free: 7.773 MB / 0.7448 GB Notification: Performance of NFInst.instExpressions: time 0.01118/0.02158, allocations: 9.649 MB / 0.7987 GB, free: 14.15 MB / 0.7605 GB Notification: Performance of NFInst.updateImplicitVariability: time 0.001307/0.02289, allocations: 88.28 kB / 0.7988 GB, free: 14.06 MB / 0.7605 GB [/var/lib/jenkins/ws/OpenModelicaLibraryTestingWork/OpenModelica/OMCompiler/Compiler/NFFrontEnd/NFCeval.mo:1059:9-1059:67:writable] Error: Internal error NFCeval.evalBinaryAdd failed to evaluate ‘i + 1‘ Notification: Performance of NFTyping.typeComponents: time 0.001859/0.02475, allocations: 0.9474 MB / 0.7997 GB, free: 13.11 MB / 0.7605 GB Notification: Performance of NFTyping.typeBindings: time 0.003178/0.02792, allocations: 1.909 MB / 0.8016 GB, free: 11.21 MB / 0.7605 GB Notification: Performance of NFTyping.typeClassSections: time 0.003022/0.03094, allocations: 1.746 MB / 0.8033 GB, free: 9.473 MB / 0.7605 GB Notification: Performance of NFFlatten.flatten: time 0.01305/0.044, allocations: 19.72 MB / 0.8225 GB, free: 5.719 MB / 0.7761 GB Notification: Performance of NFFlatten.resolveConnections: time 0.006577/0.05057, allocations: 5.356 MB / 0.8278 GB, free: 340 kB / 0.7761 GB Notification: Performance of NFEvalConstants.evaluate: time 0.009243/0.05982, allocations: 7.843 MB / 0.8354 GB, free: 8.516 MB / 0.7917 GB Notification: Performance of NFSimplifyModel.simplify: time 0.007905/0.06772, allocations: 5.718 MB / 0.841 GB, free: 2.793 MB / 0.7917 GB Notification: Performance of NFPackage.collectConstants: time 0.001926/0.06965, allocations: 0.7312 MB / 0.8417 GB, free: 2.062 MB / 0.7917 GB Notification: Performance of NFFlatten.collectFunctions: time 0.005196/0.07485, allocations: 2.411 MB / 0.8441 GB, free: 15.67 MB / 0.8073 GB Notification: Performance of NFScalarize.scalarize: time 0.003383/0.07823, allocations: 3.279 MB / 0.8473 GB, free: 12.38 MB / 0.8073 GB Notification: Performance of NFVerifyModel.verify: time 0.005289/0.08352, allocations: 3.181 MB / 0.8504 GB, free: 9.195 MB / 0.8073 GB Notification: Performance of NFConvertDAE.convert: time 0.009969/0.09349, allocations: 9.746 MB / 0.8599 GB, free: 15.42 MB / 0.823 GB Notification: Performance of FrontEnd - DAE generated: time 5.801e-06/0.09349, allocations: 0 / 0.8599 GB, free: 15.42 MB / 0.823 GB Notification: Performance of FrontEnd: time 6.21e-07/0.09349, allocations: 3.938 kB / 0.8599 GB, free: 15.42 MB / 0.823 GB Notification: Performance of Transformations before backend: time 0.0002491/0.09374, allocations: 0.7188 kB / 0.8599 GB, free: 15.42 MB / 0.823 GB Notification: Model statistics after passing the front-end and creating the data structures used by the back-end: * Number of equations: 866 * Number of variables: 866 Notification: Performance of Generate backend data structure: time 0.01302/0.1068, allocations: 8.909 MB / 0.8686 GB, free: 6.438 MB / 0.823 GB Notification: Performance of prepare preOptimizeDAE: time 3.895e-05/0.1068, allocations: 8.75 kB / 0.8686 GB, free: 6.43 MB / 0.823 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt normalInlineFunction (simulation): time 0.00189/0.1087, allocations: 0.9049 MB / 0.8695 GB, free: 5.523 MB / 0.823 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt evaluateParameters (simulation): time 0.009487/0.1182, allocations: 5.927 MB / 0.8753 GB, free: 15.48 MB / 0.8386 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt simplifyIfEquations (simulation): time 0.0001989/0.1184, allocations: 334.8 kB / 0.8756 GB, free: 15.15 MB / 0.8386 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt expandDerOperator (simulation): time 0.0006574/0.119, allocations: 483.7 kB / 0.8761 GB, free: 14.68 MB / 0.8386 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt clockPartitioning (simulation): time 0.003377/0.1224, allocations: 3.383 MB / 0.8794 GB, free: 10.97 MB / 0.8386 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt findStateOrder (simulation): time 5.438e-05/0.1225, allocations: 11.88 kB / 0.8794 GB, free: 10.96 MB / 0.8386 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt replaceEdgeChange (simulation): time 0.0002081/0.1227, allocations: 148 kB / 0.8795 GB, free: 10.81 MB / 0.8386 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt inlineArrayEqn (simulation): time 7.028e-05/0.1227, allocations: 95.92 kB / 0.8796 GB, free: 10.72 MB / 0.8386 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt removeEqualRHS (simulation): time 0.001615/0.1244, allocations: 1.273 MB / 0.8809 GB, free: 9.422 MB / 0.8386 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt removeSimpleEquations (simulation): time 0.0178/0.1422, allocations: 14.39 MB / 0.8949 GB, free: 10.67 MB / 0.8542 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt comSubExp (simulation): time 0.003922/0.1461, allocations: 2.712 MB / 0.8976 GB, free: 7.934 MB / 0.8542 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt resolveLoops (simulation): time 0.0009352/0.147, allocations: 0.7672 MB / 0.8983 GB, free: 7.164 MB / 0.8542 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt evalFunc (simulation): time 0.009454/0.1565, allocations: 4.832 MB / 0.903 GB, free: 2.309 MB / 0.8542 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt encapsulateWhenConditions (simulation): time 0.0009645/0.1574, allocations: 1.216 MB / 0.9042 GB, free: 0.9844 MB / 0.8542 GB Notification: Performance of pre-optimization done (n=219): time 3.617e-06/0.1574, allocations: 0 / 0.9042 GB, free: 0.9844 MB / 0.8542 GB Notification: Performance of matching and sorting (n=227): time 0.006456/0.1639, allocations: 3.485 MB / 0.9076 GB, free: 13.48 MB / 0.8698 GB Notification: Performance of inlineWhenForInitialization (initialization): time 6.177e-05/0.1639, allocations: 132.8 kB / 0.9078 GB, free: 13.32 MB / 0.8698 GB Notification: Performance of selectInitializationVariablesDAE (initialization): time 0.006691/0.1706, allocations: 6.743 MB / 0.9143 GB, free: 6.57 MB / 0.8698 GB Notification: Performance of collectPreVariables (initialization): time 0.0005455/0.1712, allocations: 117.7 kB / 0.9145 GB, free: 6.449 MB / 0.8698 GB Notification: Performance of collectInitialEqns (initialization): time 0.001292/0.1725, allocations: 2.007 MB / 0.9164 GB, free: 4.418 MB / 0.8698 GB Notification: Performance of collectInitialBindings (initialization): time 0.001159/0.1736, allocations: 0.8831 MB / 0.9173 GB, free: 3.527 MB / 0.8698 GB Notification: Performance of simplifyInitialFunctions (initialization): time 0.0009689/0.1746, allocations: 1.033 MB / 0.9183 GB, free: 2.484 MB / 0.8698 GB Notification: Performance of setup shared object (initialization): time 6.596e-05/0.1747, allocations: 313.1 kB / 0.9186 GB, free: 2.176 MB / 0.8698 GB Notification: Performance of preBalanceInitialSystem (initialization): time 0.0009527/0.1756, allocations: 0.7867 MB / 0.9194 GB, free: 1.367 MB / 0.8698 GB Notification: Performance of partitionIndependentBlocks (initialization): time 0.00177/0.1774, allocations: 3.061 MB / 0.9223 GB, free: 13.07 MB / 0.8855 GB Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3])) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3])) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3])) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3])) Notification: Performance of analyzeInitialSystem (initialization): time 0.00962/0.187, allocations: 8.591 MB / 0.9307 GB, free: 3.152 MB / 0.8855 GB Notification: Performance of solveInitialSystemEqSystem (initialization): time 7.995e-05/0.1871, allocations: 24 kB / 0.9308 GB, free: 3.129 MB / 0.8855 GB Notification: Performance of matching and sorting (n=654) (initialization): time 0.005233/0.1923, allocations: 3.434 MB / 0.9341 GB, free: 15.62 MB / 0.9011 GB Notification: Performance of prepare postOptimizeDAE: time 6.278e-05/0.1924, allocations: 69.69 kB / 0.9342 GB, free: 15.54 MB / 0.9011 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyComplexFunction (initialization): time 5.725e-05/0.1924, allocations: 84 kB / 0.9343 GB, free: 15.46 MB / 0.9011 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt tearingSystem (initialization): time 0.0009426/0.1934, allocations: 437.6 kB / 0.9347 GB, free: 15 MB / 0.9011 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt solveSimpleEquations (initialization): time 0.003392/0.1968, allocations: 1.505 MB / 0.9361 GB, free: 13.5 MB / 0.9011 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt calculateStrongComponentJacobians (initialization): time 0.005271/0.2021, allocations: 9.888 MB / 0.9458 GB, free: 2.934 MB / 0.9011 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyAllExpressions (initialization): time 0.004379/0.2064, allocations: 199.9 kB / 0.946 GB, free: 2.738 MB / 0.9011 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt collapseArrayExpressions (initialization): time 0.0007132/0.2071, allocations: 228 kB / 0.9462 GB, free: 2.516 MB / 0.9011 GB Warning: The initial conditions are over specified. The following 8 initial equations are redundant, so they are removed from the initialization system: sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3]) sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3]) sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3]) sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]). Notification: Performance of preBalanceInitialSystem (initialization_lambda0): time 0.003324/0.2105, allocations: 1.153 MB / 0.9473 GB, free: 1.34 MB / 0.9011 GB Notification: Performance of partitionIndependentBlocks (initialization_lambda0): time 0.002456/0.2129, allocations: 3.061 MB / 0.9503 GB, free: 13.04 MB / 0.9167 GB Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3])) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3])) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3])) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3])) Notification: Performance of analyzeInitialSystem (initialization_lambda0): time 0.01237/0.2253, allocations: 8.4 MB / 0.9585 GB, free: 3.316 MB / 0.9167 GB Notification: Performance of solveInitialSystemEqSystem (initialization_lambda0): time 8.84e-05/0.2254, allocations: 24 kB / 0.9586 GB, free: 3.293 MB / 0.9167 GB Notification: Performance of matching and sorting (n=654) (initialization_lambda0): time 0.007256/0.2326, allocations: 3.434 MB / 0.9619 GB, free: 15.78 MB / 0.9323 GB Notification: Performance of prepare postOptimizeDAE: time 6.851e-05/0.2327, allocations: 69.7 kB / 0.962 GB, free: 15.71 MB / 0.9323 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyComplexFunction (initialization): time 9.76e-05/0.2328, allocations: 87.98 kB / 0.9621 GB, free: 15.62 MB / 0.9323 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt tearingSystem (initialization): time 0.001214/0.234, allocations: 445.9 kB / 0.9625 GB, free: 15.16 MB / 0.9323 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt solveSimpleEquations (initialization): time 0.004306/0.2383, allocations: 1.505 MB / 0.9639 GB, free: 13.65 MB / 0.9323 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt calculateStrongComponentJacobians (initialization): time 0.006268/0.2446, allocations: 9.898 MB / 0.9736 GB, free: 3.078 MB / 0.9323 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyAllExpressions (initialization): time 0.005427/0.25, allocations: 207.8 kB / 0.9738 GB, free: 2.875 MB / 0.9323 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt collapseArrayExpressions (initialization): time 0.0008028/0.2508, allocations: 232 kB / 0.974 GB, free: 2.648 MB / 0.9323 GB Warning: The initial conditions are over specified. The following 8 initial equations are redundant, so they are removed from the initialization_lambda0 system: sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3]) sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3]) sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3]) sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]). Notification: Model statistics after passing the back-end for initialization: * Number of independent subsystems: 384 * Number of states: 0 () * Number of discrete variables: 5 ($PRE.pulse.count,$PRE.pulse.T_start,pulse.count,pulse.T_start,$whenCondition1) * Number of discrete states: 0 () * Number of clocked states: 0 () * Top-level inputs: 0 Notification: Strong component statistics for initialization (630): * Single equations (assignments): 622 * Array equations: 0 * Algorithm blocks: 1 * Record equations: 0 * When equations: 0 * If-equations: 0 * Equation systems (not torn): 0 * Torn equation systems: 7 * Mixed (continuous/discrete) equation systems: 0 Notification: Torn system details for strict tearing set: * Linear torn systems (#iteration vars, #inner vars, density): 7 systems {(1,9,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,9,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%)} * Non-linear torn systems (#iteration vars, #inner vars): 0 systems Notification: Performance of prepare postOptimizeDAE: time 0.001281/0.2521, allocations: 0.7505 MB / 0.9748 GB, free: 1.895 MB / 0.9323 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt lateInlineFunction (simulation): time 0.001787/0.2539, allocations: 431.5 kB / 0.9752 GB, free: 1.473 MB / 0.9323 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt wrapFunctionCalls (simulation): time 0.003761/0.2577, allocations: 1.899 MB / 0.977 GB, free: 15.54 MB / 0.948 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt inlineArrayEqn (simulation): time 2.494e-05/0.2577, allocations: 27.94 kB / 0.9771 GB, free: 15.51 MB / 0.948 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt constantLinearSystem (simulation): time 9.257e-06/0.2577, allocations: 8 kB / 0.9771 GB, free: 15.5 MB / 0.948 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifysemiLinear (simulation): time 0.001455/0.2591, allocations: 0.8745 MB / 0.9779 GB, free: 14.58 MB / 0.948 GB Warning: The model contains alias variables with redundant start and/or conflicting nominal values. It is recommended to resolve the conflicts, because otherwise the system could be hard to solve. To print the conflicting alias sets and the chosen candidates please use -d=aliasConflicts. Notification: Performance of postOpt removeSimpleEquations (simulation): time 0.01189/0.271, allocations: 5.292 MB / 0.9831 GB, free: 9.184 MB / 0.948 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyComplexFunction (simulation): time 7.544e-06/0.271, allocations: 0 / 0.9831 GB, free: 9.184 MB / 0.948 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt solveSimpleEquations (simulation): time 0.001755/0.2728, allocations: 0.7646 MB / 0.9838 GB, free: 8.418 MB / 0.948 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt tearingSystem (simulation): time 0.0007969/0.2736, allocations: 333.3 kB / 0.9842 GB, free: 8.062 MB / 0.948 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt inputDerivativesUsed (simulation): time 0.0002088/0.2738, allocations: 115.9 kB / 0.9843 GB, free: 7.949 MB / 0.948 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt calculateStrongComponentJacobians (simulation): time 0.006354/0.2802, allocations: 10.68 MB / 0.9947 GB, free: 12.59 MB / 0.9636 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt calculateStateSetsJacobians (simulation): time 1.924e-06/0.2802, allocations: 4.094 kB / 0.9947 GB, free: 12.59 MB / 0.9636 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt symbolicJacobian (simulation): time 0.004029/0.2842, allocations: 2.2 MB / 0.9968 GB, free: 10.28 MB / 0.9636 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt removeConstants (simulation): time 0.002293/0.2865, allocations: 0.9642 MB / 0.9978 GB, free: 9.312 MB / 0.9636 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyTimeIndepFuncCalls (simulation): time 0.0007672/0.2872, allocations: 115.9 kB / 0.9979 GB, free: 9.199 MB / 0.9636 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyAllExpressions (simulation): time 0.001477/0.2887, allocations: 80.14 kB / 0.998 GB, free: 9.121 MB / 0.9636 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt findZeroCrossings (simulation): time 0.000271/0.289, allocations: 165.6 kB / 0.9981 GB, free: 8.957 MB / 0.9636 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt collapseArrayExpressions (simulation): time 0.0001155/0.2891, allocations: 63.89 kB / 0.9982 GB, free: 8.895 MB / 0.9636 GB Notification: Performance of sorting global known variables: time 0.0033/0.2924, allocations: 2.648 MB / 1.001 GB, free: 6.25 MB / 0.9636 GB Notification: Performance of sort global known variables: time 1.7e-07/0.2924, allocations: 0 / 1.001 GB, free: 6.25 MB / 0.9636 GB Notification: Performance of remove unused functions: time 0.009786/0.3022, allocations: 3.933 MB / 1.005 GB, free: 2.316 MB / 0.9636 GB Notification: Model statistics after passing the back-end for simulation: * Number of independent subsystems: 12 * Number of states: 43 (sla.vol[1].dynBal.U,sla.vol[2].dynBal.U,sla.vol[3].dynBal.U,sla.vol[4].dynBal.U,sla.vol[5].dynBal.U,sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_b[1].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[2].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[3].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[4].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[5].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T[3],TOut.T) * Number of discrete variables: 3 ($whenCondition1,pulse.T_start,pulse.count) * Number of discrete states: 1 (pulse.count) * Number of clocked states: 0 () * Top-level inputs: 0 Notification: Strong component statistics for simulation (205): * Single equations (assignments): 194 * Array equations: 0 * Algorithm blocks: 0 * Record equations: 2 * When equations: 2 * If-equations: 0 * Equation systems (not torn): 0 * Torn equation systems: 7 * Mixed (continuous/discrete) equation systems: 0 Notification: Torn system details for strict tearing set: * Linear torn systems (#iteration vars, #inner vars, density): 7 systems {(1,9,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,9,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%)} * Non-linear torn systems (#iteration vars, #inner vars): 0 systems Notification: Performance of Backend phase and start with SimCode phase: time 0.001168/0.3034, allocations: 0.5053 MB / 1.005 GB, free: 1.805 MB / 0.9636 GB Notification: Performance of simCode: created initialization part: time 0.007352/0.3107, allocations: 5.811 MB / 1.011 GB, free: 11.79 MB / 0.9792 GB Notification: Performance of simCode: created event and clocks part: time 0.0001032/0.3108, allocations: 77.81 kB / 1.011 GB, free: 11.71 MB / 0.9792 GB Notification: Performance of simCode: created simulation system equations: time 0.001494/0.3123, allocations: 1.553 MB / 1.012 GB, free: 10.06 MB / 0.9792 GB Notification: Performance of simCode: created of all other equations (e.g. parameter, nominal, assert, etc): time 0.008421/0.3207, allocations: 2.871 MB / 1.015 GB, free: 7.23 MB / 0.9792 GB Notification: Performance of simCode: created linear, non-linear and system jacobian parts: time 0.01638/0.3371, allocations: 12.11 MB / 1.027 GB, free: 10.98 MB / 0.9948 GB Notification: Performance of simCode: some other stuff during SimCode phase: time 0.00181/0.3389, allocations: 1.612 MB / 1.029 GB, free: 9.34 MB / 0.9948 GB Notification: Performance of simCode: alias equations: time 0.003764/0.3427, allocations: 1.051 MB / 1.03 GB, free: 8.301 MB / 0.9948 GB Notification: Performance of simCode: all other stuff during SimCode phase: time 0.003937/0.3466, allocations: 1.756 MB / 1.031 GB, free: 6.516 MB / 0.9948 GB Notification: Performance of SimCode: time 2.345e-06/0.3466, allocations: 0 / 1.031 GB, free: 6.516 MB / 0.9948 GB Notification: Performance of Templates: time 0.4327/0.7793, allocations: 148.6 MB / 1.176 GB, free: 147.4 MB / 1.01 GB " [Timeout remaining time 299] make -j1 -f Buildings_13_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.makefile [Timeout 300] (rm -f Buildings_13_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.pipe ; mkfifo Buildings_13_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.pipe ; head -c 1048576 < Buildings_13_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.pipe >> ../files/Buildings_13_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.sim & ./Buildings_13_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU -abortSlowSimulation -alarm=240 -lv LOG_STATS > Buildings_13_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.pipe 2>&1) [Timeout 240] [Calling sys.exit(0), Time elapsed: 7.804185167886317]