Running: ./testmodel.py --libraries=/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries --ompython_omhome=/usr Buildings_12_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.conf.json loadFile("/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/ModelicaServices 4.1.0+maint.om/package.mo", uses=false) [Timeout 180] "Notification: Performance of loadFile(/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/ModelicaServices 4.1.0+maint.om/package.mo): time 0.001008/0.001008, allocations: 81.95 kB / 21.47 MB, free: 3.031 MB / 18.57 MB " [Timeout remaining time 180] loadFile("/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Complex 4.1.0+maint.om/package.mo", uses=false) [Timeout 180] "Notification: Performance of loadFile(/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Complex 4.1.0+maint.om/package.mo): time 0.001549/0.001549, allocations: 166.2 kB / 24.87 MB, free: 8.891 MB / 18.57 MB " [Timeout remaining time 180] loadFile("/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Modelica 4.1.0+maint.om/package.mo", uses=false) [Timeout 180] "Notification: Performance of loadFile(/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Modelica 4.1.0+maint.om/package.mo): time 0.9353/0.9353, allocations: 177.1 MB / 205.3 MB, free: 5.492 MB / 186.7 MB " [Timeout remaining time 179] loadFile("/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Buildings 12.1.2-maint.12.x/package.mo", uses=false) [Timeout 180] "Notification: Performance of loadFile(/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Buildings 12.1.2-maint.12.x/package.mo): time 1.784/1.784, allocations: 377.9 MB / 0.6247 GB, free: 8.418 MB / 0.5886 GB " [Timeout remaining time 178] Using package Buildings with version 12.1.2 (/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Buildings 12.1.2-maint.12.x/package.mo) Using package Modelica with version 4.1.0 (/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Modelica 4.1.0+maint.om/package.mo) Using package Complex with version 4.1.0 (/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Complex 4.1.0+maint.om/package.mo) Using package ModelicaServices with version 4.1.0 (/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/ModelicaServices 4.1.0+maint.om/package.mo) Running command: translateModel(Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU,tolerance=1e-06,outputFormat="mat",numberOfIntervals=2500,variableFilter="time|sla.sta_b.T|sla.surf_a.T|sla.surf_b.T|sla.surf_a.Q_flow|sla.surf_b.Q_flow",fileNamePrefix="Buildings_12_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU") translateModel(Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU,tolerance=1e-06,outputFormat="mat",numberOfIntervals=2500,variableFilter="time|sla.sta_b.T|sla.surf_a.T|sla.surf_b.T|sla.surf_a.Q_flow|sla.surf_b.Q_flow",fileNamePrefix="Buildings_12_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU") [Timeout 300] "Notification: Performance of FrontEnd - loaded program: time 1.312e-06/1.312e-06, allocations: 0 / 0.8128 GB, free: 1.453 MB / 0.7605 GB Notification: Performance of FrontEnd - Absyn->SCode: time 1.028e-05/1.159e-05, allocations: 7.312 kB / 0.8128 GB, free: 1.445 MB / 0.7605 GB Notification: Performance of NFInst.instantiate(Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU): time 0.01025/0.01026, allocations: 13.37 MB / 0.8259 GB, free: 4.047 MB / 0.7761 GB Notification: Performance of NFInst.instExpressions: time 0.009821/0.02008, allocations: 9.501 MB / 0.8351 GB, free: 10.56 MB / 0.7917 GB Notification: Performance of NFInst.updateImplicitVariability: time 0.0009739/0.02105, allocations: 83.31 kB / 0.8352 GB, free: 10.48 MB / 0.7917 GB Notification: Performance of NFTyping.typeComponents: time 0.001666/0.02272, allocations: 0.9361 MB / 0.8361 GB, free: 9.535 MB / 0.7917 GB Notification: Performance of NFTyping.typeBindings: time 0.002534/0.02525, allocations: 1.919 MB / 0.838 GB, free: 7.609 MB / 0.7917 GB Notification: Performance of NFTyping.typeClassSections: time 0.002788/0.02804, allocations: 1.823 MB / 0.8398 GB, free: 5.781 MB / 0.7917 GB Notification: Performance of NFFlatten.flatten: time 0.01251/0.04055, allocations: 19.84 MB / 0.8592 GB, free: 1.891 MB / 0.8073 GB Notification: Performance of NFFlatten.resolveConnections: time 0.005419/0.04597, allocations: 5.826 MB / 0.8648 GB, free: 11.99 MB / 0.823 GB Notification: Performance of NFEvalConstants.evaluate: time 0.008964/0.05494, allocations: 8.666 MB / 0.8733 GB, free: 3.355 MB / 0.823 GB Notification: Performance of NFSimplifyModel.simplify: time 0.006378/0.06132, allocations: 5.855 MB / 0.879 GB, free: 13.49 MB / 0.8386 GB Notification: Performance of NFPackage.collectConstants: time 0.001161/0.06248, allocations: 0.7343 MB / 0.8797 GB, free: 12.75 MB / 0.8386 GB Notification: Performance of NFFlatten.collectFunctions: time 0.003268/0.06574, allocations: 2.338 MB / 0.882 GB, free: 10.41 MB / 0.8386 GB Notification: Performance of NFScalarize.scalarize: time 0.002155/0.0679, allocations: 3.265 MB / 0.8852 GB, free: 7.141 MB / 0.8386 GB Notification: Performance of NFVerifyModel.verify: time 0.003724/0.07162, allocations: 3.188 MB / 0.8883 GB, free: 3.945 MB / 0.8386 GB Notification: Performance of NFConvertDAE.convert: time 0.008116/0.07974, allocations: 9.739 MB / 0.8978 GB, free: 10.18 MB / 0.8542 GB Notification: Performance of FrontEnd - DAE generated: time 5.36e-06/0.07974, allocations: 3.984 kB / 0.8978 GB, free: 10.18 MB / 0.8542 GB Notification: Performance of FrontEnd: time 1.112e-06/0.07974, allocations: 0 / 0.8978 GB, free: 10.18 MB / 0.8542 GB Notification: Performance of Transformations before backend: time 0.0001264/0.07987, allocations: 3.938 kB / 0.8978 GB, free: 10.17 MB / 0.8542 GB Notification: Model statistics after passing the front-end and creating the data structures used by the back-end: * Number of equations: 866 * Number of variables: 866 Notification: Performance of Generate backend data structure: time 0.01138/0.09125, allocations: 10.42 MB / 0.908 GB, free: 15.65 MB / 0.8698 GB Notification: Performance of prepare preOptimizeDAE: time 3.096e-05/0.09128, allocations: 8.031 kB / 0.908 GB, free: 15.64 MB / 0.8698 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt normalInlineFunction (simulation): time 0.001596/0.09288, allocations: 1.233 MB / 0.9092 GB, free: 14.41 MB / 0.8698 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt evaluateParameters (simulation): time 0.007047/0.09993, allocations: 6.672 MB / 0.9157 GB, free: 7.637 MB / 0.8698 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt simplifyIfEquations (simulation): time 0.0001632/0.1001, allocations: 334.8 kB / 0.9161 GB, free: 7.309 MB / 0.8698 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt expandDerOperator (simulation): time 0.0005079/0.1006, allocations: 471.9 kB / 0.9165 GB, free: 6.848 MB / 0.8698 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt clockPartitioning (simulation): time 0.003284/0.1039, allocations: 3.507 MB / 0.9199 GB, free: 2.938 MB / 0.8698 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt findStateOrder (simulation): time 5.529e-05/0.1039, allocations: 11.89 kB / 0.92 GB, free: 2.926 MB / 0.8698 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt replaceEdgeChange (simulation): time 0.0002327/0.1042, allocations: 148 kB / 0.9201 GB, free: 2.781 MB / 0.8698 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt inlineArrayEqn (simulation): time 6.739e-05/0.1042, allocations: 95.88 kB / 0.9202 GB, free: 2.688 MB / 0.8698 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt removeEqualRHS (simulation): time 0.001509/0.1057, allocations: 1.112 MB / 0.9213 GB, free: 1.555 MB / 0.8698 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt removeSimpleEquations (simulation): time 0.01698/0.1227, allocations: 20.6 MB / 0.9414 GB, free: 12.51 MB / 0.9011 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt comSubExp (simulation): time 0.003892/0.1266, allocations: 2.679 MB / 0.944 GB, free: 9.812 MB / 0.9011 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt resolveLoops (simulation): time 0.0009845/0.1276, allocations: 0.8296 MB / 0.9448 GB, free: 8.973 MB / 0.9011 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt evalFunc (simulation): time 0.007357/0.135, allocations: 5.547 MB / 0.9502 GB, free: 3.398 MB / 0.9011 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt encapsulateWhenConditions (simulation): time 0.001095/0.1361, allocations: 1.287 MB / 0.9515 GB, free: 1.992 MB / 0.9011 GB Notification: Performance of pre-optimization done (n=219): time 3.787e-06/0.1361, allocations: 0 / 0.9515 GB, free: 1.992 MB / 0.9011 GB Notification: Performance of matching and sorting (n=227): time 0.006853/0.1429, allocations: 4.175 MB / 0.9556 GB, free: 13.8 MB / 0.9167 GB Notification: Performance of inlineWhenForInitialization (initialization): time 5.5e-05/0.143, allocations: 132.9 kB / 0.9557 GB, free: 13.64 MB / 0.9167 GB Notification: Performance of selectInitializationVariablesDAE (initialization): time 0.0075/0.1505, allocations: 8.216 MB / 0.9637 GB, free: 5.418 MB / 0.9167 GB Notification: Performance of collectPreVariables (initialization): time 0.0002032/0.1507, allocations: 117.7 kB / 0.9638 GB, free: 5.297 MB / 0.9167 GB Notification: Performance of collectInitialEqns (initialization): time 0.003124/0.1538, allocations: 4.199 MB / 0.9679 GB, free: 1.07 MB / 0.9167 GB Notification: Performance of collectInitialBindings (initialization): time 0.000829/0.1546, allocations: 0.969 MB / 0.9689 GB, free: 96 kB / 0.9167 GB Notification: Performance of simplifyInitialFunctions (initialization): time 0.001497/0.1561, allocations: 1.563 MB / 0.9704 GB, free: 14.52 MB / 0.9323 GB Notification: Performance of setup shared object (initialization): time 9.296e-05/0.1562, allocations: 484.7 kB / 0.9709 GB, free: 14.04 MB / 0.9323 GB Notification: Performance of preBalanceInitialSystem (initialization): time 0.0007986/0.157, allocations: 0.4975 MB / 0.9714 GB, free: 13.52 MB / 0.9323 GB Notification: Performance of partitionIndependentBlocks (initialization): time 0.002528/0.1595, allocations: 4.459 MB / 0.9757 GB, free: 7.383 MB / 0.9323 GB Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3])) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3])) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3])) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3])) Notification: Performance of analyzeInitialSystem (initialization): time 0.01028/0.1698, allocations: 9.982 MB / 0.9855 GB, free: 11.64 MB / 0.948 GB Notification: Performance of solveInitialSystemEqSystem (initialization): time 3.693e-05/0.1699, allocations: 24 kB / 0.9855 GB, free: 11.62 MB / 0.948 GB Notification: Performance of matching and sorting (n=654) (initialization): time 0.005631/0.1755, allocations: 4.308 MB / 0.9897 GB, free: 7.223 MB / 0.948 GB Notification: Performance of prepare postOptimizeDAE: time 5.143e-05/0.1755, allocations: 69.7 kB / 0.9898 GB, free: 7.148 MB / 0.948 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyComplexFunction (initialization): time 5.558e-05/0.1756, allocations: 84 kB / 0.9898 GB, free: 7.066 MB / 0.948 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt tearingSystem (initialization): time 0.0008725/0.1765, allocations: 453.5 kB / 0.9903 GB, free: 6.594 MB / 0.948 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt solveSimpleEquations (initialization): time 0.002379/0.1788, allocations: 1.174 MB / 0.9914 GB, free: 5.418 MB / 0.948 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt calculateStrongComponentJacobians (initialization): time 0.005562/0.1844, allocations: 13.67 MB / 1.005 GB, free: 6.945 MB / 0.9636 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyAllExpressions (initialization): time 0.003939/0.1883, allocations: 199.9 kB / 1.005 GB, free: 6.75 MB / 0.9636 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt collapseArrayExpressions (initialization): time 0.0002737/0.1886, allocations: 235.9 kB / 1.005 GB, free: 6.52 MB / 0.9636 GB Warning: The initial conditions are over specified. The following 8 initial equations are redundant, so they are removed from the initialization system: sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3]) sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3]) sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3]) sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]). Notification: Performance of preBalanceInitialSystem (initialization_lambda0): time 0.002745/0.1914, allocations: 0.9073 MB / 1.006 GB, free: 5.602 MB / 0.9636 GB Notification: Performance of partitionIndependentBlocks (initialization_lambda0): time 0.002527/0.1939, allocations: 4.463 MB / 1.01 GB, free: 15.46 MB / 0.9792 GB Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3])) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3])) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3])) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3])) Notification: Performance of analyzeInitialSystem (initialization_lambda0): time 0.0106/0.2045, allocations: 9.959 MB / 1.02 GB, free: 3.746 MB / 0.9792 GB Notification: Performance of solveInitialSystemEqSystem (initialization_lambda0): time 3.833e-05/0.2045, allocations: 27.98 kB / 1.02 GB, free: 3.719 MB / 0.9792 GB Notification: Performance of matching and sorting (n=654) (initialization_lambda0): time 0.006171/0.2107, allocations: 4.316 MB / 1.024 GB, free: 15.31 MB / 0.9948 GB Notification: Performance of prepare postOptimizeDAE: time 5.261e-05/0.2108, allocations: 69.7 kB / 1.024 GB, free: 15.24 MB / 0.9948 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyComplexFunction (initialization): time 6.556e-05/0.2108, allocations: 84 kB / 1.025 GB, free: 15.16 MB / 0.9948 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt tearingSystem (initialization): time 0.0009493/0.2118, allocations: 441.6 kB / 1.025 GB, free: 14.7 MB / 0.9948 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt solveSimpleEquations (initialization): time 0.002287/0.2141, allocations: 1.17 MB / 1.026 GB, free: 13.52 MB / 0.9948 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt calculateStrongComponentJacobians (initialization): time 0.005725/0.2198, allocations: 13.69 MB / 1.039 GB, free: 15.04 MB / 1.01 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyAllExpressions (initialization): time 0.003699/0.2235, allocations: 203.9 kB / 1.04 GB, free: 14.84 MB / 1.01 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt collapseArrayExpressions (initialization): time 0.0002582/0.2237, allocations: 224 kB / 1.04 GB, free: 14.62 MB / 1.01 GB Warning: The initial conditions are over specified. The following 8 initial equations are redundant, so they are removed from the initialization_lambda0 system: sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3]) sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3]) sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3]) sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]). Notification: Model statistics after passing the back-end for initialization: * Number of independent subsystems: 384 * Number of states: 0 () * Number of discrete variables: 5 ($PRE.pulse.count,$PRE.pulse.T_start,pulse.count,pulse.T_start,$whenCondition1) * Number of discrete states: 0 () * Number of clocked states: 0 () * Top-level inputs: 0 Notification: Strong component statistics for initialization (630): * Single equations (assignments): 622 * Array equations: 0 * Algorithm blocks: 1 * Record equations: 0 * When equations: 0 * If-equations: 0 * Equation systems (not torn): 0 * Torn equation systems: 7 * Mixed (continuous/discrete) equation systems: 0 Notification: Torn system details for strict tearing set: * Linear torn systems (#iteration vars, #inner vars, density): 7 systems {(1,9,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,9,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%)} * Non-linear torn systems (#iteration vars, #inner vars): 0 systems Notification: Performance of prepare postOptimizeDAE: time 0.0009406/0.2247, allocations: 0.8466 MB / 1.041 GB, free: 13.77 MB / 1.01 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt lateInlineFunction (simulation): time 0.0009021/0.2256, allocations: 0.7494 MB / 1.041 GB, free: 13.02 MB / 1.01 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt wrapFunctionCalls (simulation): time 0.003122/0.2287, allocations: 2.173 MB / 1.044 GB, free: 10.8 MB / 1.01 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt inlineArrayEqn (simulation): time 1.583e-05/0.2287, allocations: 20 kB / 1.044 GB, free: 10.79 MB / 1.01 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt constantLinearSystem (simulation): time 6.783e-06/0.2287, allocations: 11.94 kB / 1.044 GB, free: 10.77 MB / 1.01 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifysemiLinear (simulation): time 0.001634/0.2304, allocations: 1.129 MB / 1.045 GB, free: 9.602 MB / 1.01 GB Warning: The model contains alias variables with redundant start and/or conflicting nominal values. It is recommended to resolve the conflicts, because otherwise the system could be hard to solve. To print the conflicting alias sets and the chosen candidates please use -d=aliasConflicts. Notification: Performance of postOpt removeSimpleEquations (simulation): time 0.009502/0.2399, allocations: 6.919 MB / 1.051 GB, free: 2.562 MB / 1.01 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyComplexFunction (simulation): time 8.126e-06/0.2399, allocations: 7.984 kB / 1.051 GB, free: 2.555 MB / 1.01 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt solveSimpleEquations (simulation): time 0.001157/0.241, allocations: 455.4 kB / 1.052 GB, free: 2.109 MB / 1.01 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt tearingSystem (simulation): time 0.0007336/0.2418, allocations: 337.6 kB / 1.052 GB, free: 1.75 MB / 1.01 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt inputDerivativesUsed (simulation): time 0.0001572/0.2419, allocations: 123.9 kB / 1.052 GB, free: 1.629 MB / 1.01 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt calculateStrongComponentJacobians (simulation): time 0.3395/0.5814, allocations: 13.5 MB / 1.066 GB, free: 217.6 MB / 1.01 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt calculateStateSetsJacobians (simulation): time 3.106e-06/0.5814, allocations: 2.719 kB / 1.066 GB, free: 217.6 MB / 1.01 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt symbolicJacobian (simulation): time 0.00439/0.5858, allocations: 2.79 MB / 1.068 GB, free: 217 MB / 1.01 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt removeConstants (simulation): time 0.002025/0.5878, allocations: 1.222 MB / 1.069 GB, free: 217 MB / 1.01 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyTimeIndepFuncCalls (simulation): time 0.0007811/0.5886, allocations: 113.6 kB / 1.07 GB, free: 217 MB / 1.01 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyAllExpressions (simulation): time 0.001651/0.5902, allocations: 78.75 kB / 1.07 GB, free: 217 MB / 1.01 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt findZeroCrossings (simulation): time 0.0002447/0.5905, allocations: 166.6 kB / 1.07 GB, free: 217 MB / 1.01 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt collapseArrayExpressions (simulation): time 0.000109/0.5906, allocations: 71.28 kB / 1.07 GB, free: 217 MB / 1.01 GB Notification: Performance of sorting global known variables: time 0.003572/0.5941, allocations: 3.69 MB / 1.073 GB, free: 216.7 MB / 1.01 GB Notification: Performance of sort global known variables: time 7e-08/0.5941, allocations: 1.312 kB / 1.073 GB, free: 216.7 MB / 1.01 GB Notification: Performance of remove unused functions: time 0.00687/0.601, allocations: 3.942 MB / 1.077 GB, free: 216.7 MB / 1.01 GB Notification: Model statistics after passing the back-end for simulation: * Number of independent subsystems: 12 * Number of states: 43 (sla.vol[1].dynBal.U,sla.vol[2].dynBal.U,sla.vol[3].dynBal.U,sla.vol[4].dynBal.U,sla.vol[5].dynBal.U,sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_b[1].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[2].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[3].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[4].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[5].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T[3],TOut.T) * Number of discrete variables: 3 ($whenCondition1,pulse.T_start,pulse.count) * Number of discrete states: 1 (pulse.count) * Number of clocked states: 0 () * Top-level inputs: 0 Notification: Strong component statistics for simulation (205): * Single equations (assignments): 194 * Array equations: 0 * Algorithm blocks: 0 * Record equations: 2 * When equations: 2 * If-equations: 0 * Equation systems (not torn): 0 * Torn equation systems: 7 * Mixed (continuous/discrete) equation systems: 0 Notification: Torn system details for strict tearing set: * Linear torn systems (#iteration vars, #inner vars, density): 7 systems {(1,9,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,9,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%)} * Non-linear torn systems (#iteration vars, #inner vars): 0 systems Notification: Performance of Backend phase and start with SimCode phase: time 0.0009063/0.6019, allocations: 0.539 MB / 1.078 GB, free: 216.6 MB / 1.01 GB Notification: Performance of simCode: created initialization part: time 0.006551/0.6085, allocations: 7.342 MB / 1.085 GB, free: 213.9 MB / 1.01 GB Notification: Performance of simCode: created event and clocks part: time 5.411e-06/0.6085, allocations: 2.656 kB / 1.085 GB, free: 213.9 MB / 1.01 GB Notification: Performance of simCode: created simulation system equations: time 0.001387/0.6099, allocations: 2.069 MB / 1.087 GB, free: 212.7 MB / 1.01 GB Notification: Performance of simCode: created of all other equations (e.g. parameter, nominal, assert, etc): time 0.006184/0.6161, allocations: 2.696 MB / 1.09 GB, free: 212.4 MB / 1.01 GB Notification: Performance of simCode: created linear, non-linear and system jacobian parts: time 0.01453/0.6306, allocations: 13.31 MB / 1.103 GB, free: 206.8 MB / 1.01 GB Notification: Performance of simCode: some other stuff during SimCode phase: time 0.001574/0.6322, allocations: 1.91 MB / 1.105 GB, free: 206.6 MB / 1.01 GB Notification: Performance of simCode: alias equations: time 0.003671/0.6358, allocations: 1.041 MB / 1.106 GB, free: 206.3 MB / 1.01 GB Notification: Performance of simCode: all other stuff during SimCode phase: time 0.003723/0.6396, allocations: 1.986 MB / 1.107 GB, free: 206.2 MB / 1.01 GB Notification: Performance of SimCode: time 1.573e-06/0.6396, allocations: 4 kB / 1.107 GB, free: 206.2 MB / 1.01 GB Notification: Performance of Templates: time 0.1292/0.7687, allocations: 148 MB / 1.252 GB, free: 86.77 MB / 1.01 GB " [Timeout remaining time 299] make -j1 -f Buildings_12_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.makefile [Timeout 300] (rm -f Buildings_12_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.pipe ; mkfifo Buildings_12_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.pipe ; head -c 1048576 < Buildings_12_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.pipe >> ../files/Buildings_12_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.sim & ./Buildings_12_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU -abortSlowSimulation -alarm=240 -emit_protected -lv LOG_STATS > Buildings_12_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.pipe 2>&1) [Timeout 240] diffSimulationResults("Buildings_12_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU_res.mat","/mnt/ReferenceFiles/Buildings/csv/maint_12.x/Buildings_Fluid_HeatExchangers_RadiantSlabs_Examples_StepResponseEpsilonNTU.csv","",relTol=0.003,relTolDiffMinMax=0.003,rangeDelta=0.001) [Timeout 300] "" [Timeout remaining time 300] Reference file matches [Calling sys.exit(0), Time elapsed: 8.081063629128039]